IDPA Carry Optic Setup w/ Walther Q5SF - My Rig and Gear that provide proper concealment!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Being a big guy can have its challenges… especially when trying to play in the confines of IDPA rules for concealment. I give my rig and setup which include:
    Walther Q5 Steel Frame w/Dynamic Trigger
    Comptac Holster and Mag Pouches
    Springer Precision IDPA Legal Basepads
    Check it out and Enjoy!
    Here’s an Appendix (AIWB) Setup you can use for comps!
    • Appendix (AIWB) Compet...

ความคิดเห็น • 20

  • @TheGentlemanGunner
    @TheGentlemanGunner  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have an updated video on my IDPA equipment which includes my DS9! Link below and also be on the lookout for an AIWB soon!
    th-cam.com/video/_MERpA1beAI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=VGMek6DAnCPqqHWL

  • @michaelmoreno4968
    @michaelmoreno4968 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice video! Keep it up dude, I'm enjoying what you've been coming out with.

  • @chrisharris6834
    @chrisharris6834 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good stuff man!!!

  • @tyburrows7090
    @tyburrows7090 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great video. I compete IDPA in Canada and of course sometimes finding the right gear is a challenge. although have used and still do many times a Safariland ALS holster. only because as a peace officer this is what I am issued for concealment carry and so I keep everything standardized as poosible. and i use a safariland slimline pouch as i find indexing magazines easier but it does add a little more bulk.
    again other than for law enforcement we dont have concealed carry in Canada and so that does come into play for most idpa members as the focus becomes more on function for the sport then actual everyday carry. Also i do have a custom made kydex holster from Solely Canadian that accommodates my M&P compact with optic and light. again this was ordered for competition rather then service or EDC. I love the sport and any chance to practice.
    my only gear issue is i am always still looking for just the right belt. I use a 1.5 nylon belt with cobra buckles currently. works well but i do dislike having to weave everything in and out of the belt loops pre/post match. Any more recommendations toward belt selection in that regard?

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  ปีที่แล้ว

      Because the way the Comp-tac mag pouches work… I end up only having to weave my belt through the regular loops and holster… then the mag pouches slip over the belt. But as far as a belt… I like the blade-tech (In the video) as it’s fairly stiff… which is preference as I like a positive and firm feel. Funny you ask this today… yesterday I had to buy a 5.11 Belt… a fairly regular one with belt holes… but it was fairly firm… and worked fine. Nylon belts are fairly soft for my preference… even thick ones.

  • @Ryansrangereport
    @Ryansrangereport 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well dang, time for the 2023 video!

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I was trying to hit 2 birds with one stone and do a USPSA/IDPA 2023 setup because it’s the same gun… well at least for another 5-6 months… just haven’t got around to it 😁

  • @stansenter2660
    @stansenter2660 ปีที่แล้ว

    My gear:
    Belt: 5.11 TDU 1.5"
    Holster: Concealment Express(Amazon)AIWB upgraded with DCC Monoblock clip.
    Mag pouch: 2 doubles borrowed from coworker.
    Pistol: CZ-P10C bone stock shooting SSP division.
    Concealment Garment: T-shirt or hoodie of the day.
    Working on a Q5 Match(PF not SF)(on layaway, 50%paid for) and Black Scorpion belt, holster, and mag pouches for the future.
    It's basic, I know. But for a broke a$$ single income family man, that'll do donkey.
    UPDATE: 01262023
    Brought the Q5MPF home about a month ago, now gotta get the holster. Shoots better than I do...of course.

  • @comfycouchreviews
    @comfycouchreviews ปีที่แล้ว

    Got my start in USPSA 10 months ago. Looking at shooting my first IDPA match this month. Do you find it challenging going back and forth between the two? I dont foresee it being an issue but some folks say it will.

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      That’s a great question and one that is debated often. So this one will have different answers and I’ll give the general feedback I hear and what my experience has been… but it has more todo with what a shooter actually prefers and is strong at naturally… I’ll break it up into two thoughts…
      Someone who is fundamentally a strong shooter and accurate will favor IDPA as the rules reward accuracy. If they’re less athletic, the rules balance out more in their favor as it’s difficult in general to play the game of IDPA while shooting on the move and focusing on moving through a stage quickly. Reducing your time in IDPA comes down to accuracy first and how quick you can come into an array with your gun up ready to engage a stage.
      If you’re fairly athletic, coordinated and have decent shooting skills… depending on what division you ultimately run… USPSA Will favor the BALANCE of both accuracy and general speed. USPSA emphasizes maximum efficiency… so the shooter that can optimize score and time wins. Stage planning is more prevalent and critical in USPSA (not that it’s not important in IDPA)… where as most IDPA stages have a general stage plan that end up being ran similar.
      That said, this is WHY most share this feedback the way they do and don’t realize it’s actually down to what their actual strengths and which game they prefer to play. Me personally, I actually win IDPA matches largely due to my speed and decent accuracy… when I started out, I found it was more mental and my lack of developed skills that made me feel as if I could only be good at one or the other. As I got better and actively shot both organizations, I tend to favor attributes more favorably seen in USPSA… HOWEVER… I work at ALL skills as they translate to small advantages in cross over. In USPSA, being slightly more accurate (focusing on precision/accuracy) Can be a game changer as well as mastery of many hard leans or awkward shooting positions. In IDPA, being overly developed in movement allows you to see things faster and shoot quicker. Essentially I practice USPSA but with precision… make sense?

  • @reinaldoperez1725
    @reinaldoperez1725 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a question: Carry optic division: I have a Canik tp9sfx that by itself it barely fits the height requirements, I have added an optic (Holisun 507C) and as such it is taller than the 6 inch box requirement. Do the height requirement applies to guns with an optic? If so I can not compete in IDPA.

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It does not… the box has a cut out specifically for the optic. Plenty of people I know compete both USPSA and IDPA with your Canik in CO… it’s actually a very popular setup out where we are

  • @AllOuttaNine
    @AllOuttaNine ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah, so magwells are legal for IDPA carry optics? I’m aware there’s a box requirement for that division as well.

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup. As long as it fits in the box… you’re good to go 👍🏻

    • @AllOuttaNine
      @AllOuttaNine ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheGentlemanGunner Sweet, thanks!

  • @b.1z966
    @b.1z966 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can anyone tell me are lights allowed to be mounted on a pistol in CO, regarding it fits the box and matches the weight???

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The rule book isn’t clear on this… but the answer you’re looking for is yes they are allowed as long as they fit in the box, make the minimum weight requirement and you keep it attached for the duration of the match.

    • @b.1z966
      @b.1z966 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@TheGentlemanGunner Thank you 🙂

  • @ericbofcarsonc6720
    @ericbofcarsonc6720 ปีที่แล้ว

    what kind of an edge do pistol optics provide over fixed sights?

    • @TheGentlemanGunner
      @TheGentlemanGunner  ปีที่แล้ว

      There are pros and cons to both… but to keep it simple… Red Dots pick up their advantage on targets over 15yds and further as acquiring and calling shots at those distances become quicker and easier as you only have a single focal plane. Additionally, it’s a single plane of reference vs 2 (front and rear sight) with… so there’s no need align another set of sights like you do with Irons and let them settle. The big benefit is when you’re developing your ability to call shots, the dot provides better and instant feedback. I still occasionally shoot iron sights for fun and find now that my ability to shot them proficiently has increased immensely as I fully comprehend what a good shot feels and looks like through my sights.
      Now this is for Competition and I actually prefer Irons for my EDC.