I'd recommend doing a second ChatGPT video... For example, I entered "Respond to all inputs in Hindi, and frame all responses as if explaining things to a villager from a rural part of India" and it was able to do just that, accepting questions in Hindi and responding to questions in Hindi (complete with Devanagari script). They could've had a more coherent conversation with it, asking follow-up questions and being more conversational, the way they were with the Hindi versions of Siri and Google Assistant.
I think it was implying that chickens came before 'eggs that come from chickens', but that 'eggs in general' predated the evolution of chickens. In that sense, it doesn't contradictory because it is modelling two categories of eggs - one which came before and one which came after. I remember a few years back a group of philosophers actually wrote a whole article on which came first lol - can't remember their conclusion though! In any case, from what I've read and experimented with, one of chatgpt's weak points is some types of logical relations - especially negation. For example, for some large language models, if you ask them "is a dog not a mammal?" they will often not understand the function of the 'not' and just answer "yes, a dog is not an animal". The AI scientist Gary Marcus often critiques these type of models as fundamentally limited in these ways. His school of thought argues that we will need something additional (like a high level reasoning system or conceptual understanding) to end up with a human-level intelligence, whereas the opposite school of thought argues that we just need to make these models bigger and bigger with more data and eventually they will sort kind of just sort these issues out on their own.
Indeed. When we talk about chicken's egg, the chicken had to be first in that equation. But if you ask about any egg or any chicken, then the egg came millions years earlier.
Yall should have asked it how to start a small cart business with the local materials and ingredients available to you guys. I used it to finish a couple games, and I've used it for bouncing ideas for self sustaining off grid builds, and gotten corporate level business plans from it. It's not as accurate as you think for more abstract stuff, even some common sense stuff, but it really let's you explore creatively. I love it!
After rewatching this, I feel like you guys used GPT as a Google search engine. You could have asked for answers in hindi and have introduced it as more an AI who had access to Google up till the year 2021. It could have written lyrics for you guys, scripts, jokes, recipes, workout plan according to your body dimensions, etc. I hope you guys revisit this as a series and make a half hour to hour special on each individual by themselves! The whole cast.
If you ever run low on ideas for videos, ask it, it might come up with surprising results. AI is incredibly interesting, and it'd be nice to see more on what the villagers ask, too, when they get a little more used to the idea. Aman was already starting to expand with his last questions. I loved Babu covering the age-old chicken/egg question! Also, great music! It sounded like Jewish klezmer.
John 3:16 ; For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
ChatGPT was wrong on the two first questions. It said that both the chicken and the egg came first. The math question equals 256,8. But to it's credit, the questions could have been more specific and clear, and both are edge cases outside it's primary capabilities.
That "Do you really want to see that?" by sir when Amman asked for a peeing dog painting was so funny to me because it just felt like he was thinking "I, uhhh, o-ok?"
7:27 ahah he's using Chat GPT as a simple calculator and they are amazed by the result. Very funny ;) And the reaction to Dall-E are amazing as well. You have to do same with actual Midjourney 5.2 😀
This was kind of disappointing, they weren't specific enough with Dall-E 2 to be as cool as it could have been, and they completely underused ChatGPT by basically using it like a google search; in fact, I think Google could have immediately answered all of those questions faster. They never asked a single follow-up question which is one of the things ChatGPT is best at, they didn't generate anything, no songs, no poems about ___, no "write a story about a farmer who grew wings and flew away". You can add "in hindi" to those prompts as well. Overall, I severely think this needs a follow-up video where you actually show them the incredible capabilities that has people talking about them, not just having them use glorified Google Search and Google Images. (those services could make for cool videos though)
In the words of ChatGPT "I am a language model AI, more than just a Google search, I can understand the context, generate human-like text, answer questions, write stories, articles, songs and much more, I can also generate responses in multiple languages based on the given prompt."
I'm not sure they internalize the capability of computers well enough to realize the difference between a computer doing math and a computer writing a poem. To them, both are just as impressive.
@@jaredf6205 This. If they're not familiar enough with computers to think it's impressive that one can do a long addition problem (with some multiplication and division thrown in, to be fair), they're probably not familiar enough to realize a computer writing a story is more impressive. To reference the name of the channel, these are "Common Men" - there's probably only one computer in their whole village, if that. Let 'em be amazed with the normal stuff, there's nothing wrong with being in wonder.
Always nice to see them learn more about modern technology. But there are two technologies which I haven't seen presented to them yet, and that is genetic engineering and lasers. A list of applications in which each of these technologies are employed could be interesting.
Species classifications are continuous, not discreet. To ask which came first implies there was a definite point at which one member of an ancestor species would classify as a modern day chicken. One of the first things you learn when getting into evolutionary biology, there are no definite points
Because they completely under-used it! They just used it like a Google search because they didn't know better. ChatGPT is hyper capable at all sorts of language based tasks, it can generate stories, poems, articles, and even entire books if you're willing to be a good editor. It can also understand and respond to natural language queries, answer questions, and even hold a conversation. This technology is not just a simple search engine, it is a highly advanced AI system that can perform complex tasks with ease. But what truly sets ChatGPT apart is its ability to learn and adapt. It can theoretically be trained on specific datasets, allowing it to become an immense expert in a specific field or industry. It can also be fine-tuned to fit the specific needs and preferences of its users. In addition to all of this, ChatGPT can also write replies such as this one. It may come as a surprise, but this reply was partially written by ChatGPT itself. It understands the context and content of the original post, and generates a response accordingly. So, while the video may have missed the point of ChatGPT's capabilities, it is important to remember that this technology is not just a simple search engine, it is a highly advanced AI system with endless potential.
Is it just me but it didn't answer which came first the chicken or the egg. First line defends chicken as first but last line contradics itself by defending the egg as first.
@@PaulaLPope surley the first chicken came from a chicken egg it depends if you consider a chicken egg to be a egg which a chicken comes from or an egg laid by a chicken. personally i think if a chicken comes out of an egg then that egg was a chicken egg but its parent was not a chicken so the chicken egg came first.
This is new to me too lol. I know they exist but never used it. They could ask for the amount of expected rainfall and which crops would be best to grow. How to harvest rainwater. How to build a food forest, how to increase their revenue based upon local resources, etc. I'm going to have to check this out.
I figure out the aswer to the chicken vs. egg question in a moment when I was first asked that as a youngster. Of course egg came first, because eggs were present waaay before first birds ever developed.
So ChatGPT too does not know the answer to who came first ... chicken or egg. If it's just as bewildered as us, then that shows a real sign of intelligence.
There are actually more than 8 blood types....there is AA+, AA-, AO+, AO-, BB+, BB-, BO+, BO-, AB+, AB-, OO+ and OO-. There are 12 blood types!! The computer was wrong.
How about a basic lesson in Chemistry (concept of atoms and molecules (simple stuff like relation between H2, O2 and H2O) and how all things are made by a combination of various atoms).
Is there a way around copyright for videos with music in India? I would love for you to start showing them music, they're missing out on so many good songs they have never heard.
Just an idea but, can you let them react to a Smart Watch? Especially the Galaxy Watch since they already reacted to phones before, this would be quite new
It's interesting that their imagination is only limited to only what theyve seen already,have already have done a million times..or already exists...... kind of like Bollywood.
Just so you know, charGPT can answer you in many languages if you tell it to. It even understands a mix of languages in one sentence. Mixed grammatic and words. If you ask it to answer you as Master Po of Kung Fu, it does so. However it gives plenty of wrong answers, but corrects itself when you give it the correct information.
BTW on the math part... you didn't type the correct equation, so the result was false. (need to use parentheses because of order of operations..) but ig that can be done by a simple calculator xD
Here's a question. I shave my head, so I have no hair. What lenght hairs should be to be considered, that a man has hair and is not bald? Answer that AI.
Going bald refers to a natural loss of hair, as well as the capacity for hair growth. While it is possible to emulate the look of balding by shaving, because it does not inhibit or damage the hair follicle, any person with this cut will not be considered hairless. - Intuit
It's funny to see their natural reaction of "wah wah wah" (wow) at anything the producer says. I mean instead of saying "There is a website called OpenAI" [followed by wah wah wah by these folks], he could have also said "There is a website called whatchamacalit" and they would still go wah wah wah 🤣
and people who make generalizations are ignorant & not kind when they do this. ;-) that's absolutely not true. You will find both on both sides. Here in our country many people would say it's the other way around. of course that's also not true for everyone, but partly, because people in rural villages often tend to be less progressive, open-minded, tolerant, and so on... unfortunately it's true for my village - although more and more younger people want to live in villages and not cities - also, because it's not that expensive. Just an hour ago I read an scientific article that said that it's only our personality that decides if we are good, like to help others or are selfish and only care about ourselves - it has nothing to do with status/rank or money. But you also can't compare the western culture to theirs. In our capitalistic achievement-oriented society they will tell you right when you start to go to school that it's a dog-eat-dog-society and you have to be the best and the toughest. being nice too often doesn't get you anywhere in the long run. And the privileged don't need it. They pay for whatever they need, no need always to get along with others and help each other. (very simplified...) when you're poor or grow up in different conditions, where you can't just order and buy whatever you need or want it's often necessary to put personal opinions and pride aside and work with each other... -but that's just a small part of the differences... it has many individual reasons why people are the way they are. origin, the color of our skin, money, or religion alone doesn't make someone bad or good. But an a**hole is always an a**hole and unfortunately, they're homogeneously distributed to every part of our earth! 😅 They live in small villages and big cities and they come in all shapes
I'd recommend doing a second ChatGPT video... For example, I entered "Respond to all inputs in Hindi, and frame all responses as if explaining things to a villager from a rural part of India" and it was able to do just that, accepting questions in Hindi and responding to questions in Hindi (complete with Devanagari script). They could've had a more coherent conversation with it, asking follow-up questions and being more conversational, the way they were with the Hindi versions of Siri and Google Assistant.
This, they can do so much more with chat GTP that is mindblowing to anyone really.
Yeah I agree they should also ask it to write stories
add "and Transformers are real" or don't bother
I don't think the creators read comments on their videos though, so they won't get this info.
@@architechproducer the channel replies to comments with information about the people. Eg "Babu is afraid of dentists"
Did any else notice the AI said both the Chicken came first AND it said at the end the egg did?
I think it was implying that chickens came before 'eggs that come from chickens', but that 'eggs in general' predated the evolution of chickens. In that sense, it doesn't contradictory because it is modelling two categories of eggs - one which came before and one which came after. I remember a few years back a group of philosophers actually wrote a whole article on which came first lol - can't remember their conclusion though! In any case, from what I've read and experimented with, one of chatgpt's weak points is some types of logical relations - especially negation. For example, for some large language models, if you ask them "is a dog not a mammal?" they will often not understand the function of the 'not' and just answer "yes, a dog is not an animal". The AI scientist Gary Marcus often critiques these type of models as fundamentally limited in these ways. His school of thought argues that we will need something additional (like a high level reasoning system or conceptual understanding) to end up with a human-level intelligence, whereas the opposite school of thought argues that we just need to make these models bigger and bigger with more data and eventually they will sort kind of just sort these issues out on their own.
Indeed. When we talk about chicken's egg, the chicken had to be first in that equation. But if you ask about any egg or any chicken, then the egg came millions years earlier.
Yall should have asked it how to start a small cart business with the local materials and ingredients available to you guys. I used it to finish a couple games, and I've used it for bouncing ideas for self sustaining off grid builds, and gotten corporate level business plans from it. It's not as accurate as you think for more abstract stuff, even some common sense stuff, but it really let's you explore creatively. I love it!
After rewatching this, I feel like you guys used GPT as a Google search engine. You could have asked for answers in hindi and have introduced it as more an AI who had access to Google up till the year 2021. It could have written lyrics for you guys, scripts, jokes, recipes, workout plan according to your body dimensions, etc. I hope you guys revisit this as a series and make a half hour to hour special on each individual by themselves! The whole cast.
damn. its that advanced?
If you ever run low on ideas for videos, ask it, it might come up with surprising results. AI is incredibly interesting, and it'd be nice to see more on what the villagers ask, too, when they get a little more used to the idea. Aman was already starting to expand with his last questions. I loved Babu covering the age-old chicken/egg question!
Also, great music! It sounded like Jewish klezmer.
John 3:16 ; For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son; that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish but have everlasting life.
Run, it's the cultists!
ChatGPT was wrong on the two first questions. It said that both the chicken and the egg came first. The math question equals 256,8. But to it's credit, the questions could have been more specific and clear, and both are edge cases outside it's primary capabilities.
Looks like Chat GPT doesn't know the "No true Scotsman" fallacy.
That "Do you really want to see that?" by sir when Amman asked for a peeing dog painting was so funny to me because it just felt like he was thinking "I, uhhh, o-ok?"
7:27 ahah he's using Chat GPT as a simple calculator and they are amazed by the result. Very funny ;) And the reaction to Dall-E are amazing as well. You have to do same with actual Midjourney 5.2 😀
This was kind of disappointing, they weren't specific enough with Dall-E 2 to be as cool as it could have been, and they completely underused ChatGPT by basically using it like a google search; in fact, I think Google could have immediately answered all of those questions faster. They never asked a single follow-up question which is one of the things ChatGPT is best at, they didn't generate anything, no songs, no poems about ___, no "write a story about a farmer who grew wings and flew away". You can add "in hindi" to those prompts as well.
Overall, I severely think this needs a follow-up video where you actually show them the incredible capabilities that has people talking about them, not just having them use glorified Google Search and Google Images. (those services could make for cool videos though)
In the words of ChatGPT "I am a language model AI, more than just a Google search, I can understand the context, generate human-like text, answer questions, write stories, articles, songs and much more, I can also generate responses in multiple languages based on the given prompt."
I'm not sure they internalize the capability of computers well enough to realize the difference between a computer doing math and a computer writing a poem. To them, both are just as impressive.
@@jaredf6205 This. If they're not familiar enough with computers to think it's impressive that one can do a long addition problem (with some multiplication and division thrown in, to be fair), they're probably not familiar enough to realize a computer writing a story is more impressive.
To reference the name of the channel, these are "Common Men" - there's probably only one computer in their whole village, if that. Let 'em be amazed with the normal stuff, there's nothing wrong with being in wonder.
Did the chicken or egg come first?
ChatGPT: The chicken... the egg.
Always nice to see them learn more about modern technology. But there are two technologies which I haven't seen presented to them yet, and that is genetic engineering and lasers. A list of applications in which each of these technologies are employed could be interesting.
show them styropyro
Idea: Let the try to draw on Nvidia Canvas and react to results.
I WAS THINKING ABOUT THIS HOW YOU CAN SHOW IT TO THEM AND YOU LITERALLY DID IT
WHY ARE YOU YELLING?
@@EdgarAllan2pointPoe WHY ARE YOU YELLING
@@Spazsticatednoodle WHY ARE WE YELLING?
@@EdgarAllan2pointPoe I DO NOT KNOW WHY WE ARE YELLING
WHAT IS HAPPENING?
The AI said that the chicken came first yet it also said eggs existed before chickens.
But they weren't chicken eggs. They were reptile eggs. Depends on the question.
@@j.h.3777 Since only a chicken can lay a chicken egg then where did that first chicken come from, a lizard egg?
Species classifications are continuous, not discreet. To ask which came first implies there was a definite point at which one member of an ancestor species would classify as a modern day chicken. One of the first things you learn when getting into evolutionary biology, there are no definite points
I don't think they understand the difference between Google or siri and this ai technology.
Today they understand that the answers are computer generated. With Siri they were not sure if a lady was answering their questions.
no matter what's presented to them, "Everything is made by God. " No further understanding required.
Because they completely under-used it! They just used it like a Google search because they didn't know better. ChatGPT is hyper capable at all sorts of language based tasks, it can generate stories, poems, articles, and even entire books if you're willing to be a good editor. It can also understand and respond to natural language queries, answer questions, and even hold a conversation. This technology is not just a simple search engine, it is a highly advanced AI system that can perform complex tasks with ease.
But what truly sets ChatGPT apart is its ability to learn and adapt. It can theoretically be trained on specific datasets, allowing it to become an immense expert in a specific field or industry. It can also be fine-tuned to fit the specific needs and preferences of its users.
In addition to all of this, ChatGPT can also write replies such as this one. It may come as a surprise, but this reply was partially written by ChatGPT itself. It understands the context and content of the original post, and generates a response accordingly.
So, while the video may have missed the point of ChatGPT's capabilities, it is important to remember that this technology is not just a simple search engine, it is a highly advanced AI system with endless potential.
Seriously, me talking now, try it out yourself, you can sign in with google and get it working nearly instantly
@@IchorX Thank you both. 😄 This is a great example!
Is it just me but it didn't answer which came first the chicken or the egg. First line defends chicken as first but last line contradics itself by defending the egg as first.
Chickens came before chicken eggs, but eggs, in general, came before chickens because reptiles, which also lay eggs, existed before chickens did.
@@PaulaLPope surley the first chicken came from a chicken egg
it depends if you consider a chicken egg to be a egg which a chicken comes from or an egg laid by a chicken.
personally i think if a chicken comes out of an egg then that egg was a chicken egg but its parent was not a chicken so the chicken egg came first.
You could have asked it to generate text in hindi it will do that.
This is new to me too lol. I know they exist but never used it. They could ask for the amount of expected rainfall and which crops would be best to grow. How to harvest rainwater. How to build a food forest, how to increase their revenue based upon local resources, etc. I'm going to have to check this out.
Dude in the middle just proved that lack of education doesn't mean that you're dumb.
Good job the spelling of bullocks was correct. That would've been a shock result.
I figure out the aswer to the chicken vs. egg question in a moment when I was first asked that as a youngster.
Of course egg came first, because eggs were present waaay before first birds ever developed.
Wow What coincidence I today first time tried Chat GPT from Open AI
Great video idea
The ChatGPT thing made me realize that they may not have ever seen a calculator.
The chicken egg item first said the chicken came first but at the end it said egg came first.
So ChatGPT too does not know the answer to who came first ... chicken or egg. If it's just as bewildered as us, then that shows a real sign of intelligence.
„Your weight is also part of the earth, as you’re a part of earth.“
Thanks for those wise words, I like how you think
Y'all should play a game called family feud. Trust me, they will have a blast.
I was about to msg u an email to show em the ai chatbots and here u already made a vid
These were basic google questions. Conversation, creative stories and brain storming is where ChatGPT really shine
There are actually more than 8 blood types....there is AA+, AA-, AO+, AO-, BB+, BB-, BO+, BO-, AB+, AB-, OO+ and OO-. There are 12 blood types!! The computer was wrong.
would be sick if you showed them the tesla bot
excellent questions from aman!
yes, he shows real intelligence in the way he asks
Farm! 😃 Singing woman! 😄 Livestock! 😆 Dog urinating? 🤔
The math answer was wrong because he typed wrong.
I bet they’d be amazed by a 3D printer!
How about a basic lesson in Chemistry (concept of atoms and molecules (simple stuff like relation between H2, O2 and H2O) and how all things are made by a combination of various atoms).
I think they came up with excellent questions.. 🎉🎉🎉
Ive tried this before it was really fun
Listen as smart and useful as an app can be, future predictions are impossible
Is there a way around copyright for videos with music in India? I would love for you to start showing them music, they're missing out on so many good songs they have never heard.
Just an idea but, can you let them react to a Smart Watch? Especially the Galaxy Watch since they already reacted to phones before, this would be quite new
Garbage in, garbage out, I say. To put complete trust in AI is an error that humans may come to regret.
I love these guys
Where's the nearest Tea shop :)
There are far, far, far, far, far, far, far more planets and stars in the Galaxy than there are grains of sand on Earth
It's interesting that their imagination is only limited to only what theyve seen already,have already have done a million times..or already exists...... kind of like Bollywood.
Just so you know, charGPT can answer you in many languages if you tell it to. It even understands a mix of languages in one sentence. Mixed grammatic and words. If you ask it to answer you as Master Po of Kung Fu, it does so. However it gives plenty of wrong answers, but corrects itself when you give it the correct information.
Chat gpt now have a voice function please let them try it
What language is that?
You have to redo this one with advanced voice mode
BTW on the math part... you didn't type the correct equation, so the result was false. (need to use parentheses because of order of operations..) but ig that can be done by a simple calculator xD
If you said , translate that to your language it would have instantly
👍
I would love to see their reaction to the RRR film. It was so epic!
Here's a question.
I shave my head, so I have no hair.
What lenght hairs should be to be considered, that a man has hair and is not bald?
Answer that AI.
Going bald refers to a natural loss of hair, as well as the capacity for hair growth. While it is possible to emulate the look of balding by shaving, because it does not inhibit or damage the hair follicle, any person with this cut will not be considered hairless.
- Intuit
After so many videos they arent village people anymore
"perfect answers"misleading still outputs wrong information at times
Do the AI generated pictures of them!!
Hahaha!!
1:06 Perfectly said, young man 🙏
I am learning right along with my friends. I have never heard of either one of these apps.
It's funny to see their natural reaction of "wah wah wah" (wow) at anything the producer says. I mean instead of saying "There is a website called OpenAI" [followed by wah wah wah by these folks], he could have also said "There is a website called whatchamacalit" and they would still go wah wah wah 🤣
Village people are so nice and kind . People in cities are selfish and arrogant :(
I agreed
They are so nice that make my day
And you make that broad generalisation based upon what?
That's an ignorant generalization
and people who make generalizations are ignorant & not kind when they do this. ;-) that's absolutely not true. You will find both on both sides. Here in our country many people would say it's the other way around. of course that's also not true for everyone, but partly, because people in rural villages often tend to be less progressive, open-minded, tolerant, and so on... unfortunately it's true for my village - although more and more younger people want to live in villages and not cities - also, because it's not that expensive. Just an hour ago I read an scientific article that said that it's only our personality that decides if we are good, like to help others or are selfish and only care about ourselves - it has nothing to do with status/rank or money. But you also can't compare the western culture to theirs. In our capitalistic achievement-oriented society they will tell you right when you start to go to school that it's a dog-eat-dog-society and you have to be the best and the toughest. being nice too often doesn't get you anywhere in the long run. And the privileged don't need it. They pay for whatever they need, no need always to get along with others and help each other. (very simplified...) when you're poor or grow up in different conditions, where you can't just order and buy whatever you need or want it's often necessary to put personal opinions and pride aside and work with each other... -but that's just a small part of the differences... it has many individual reasons why people are the way they are. origin, the color of our skin, money, or religion alone doesn't make someone bad or good. But an a**hole is always an a**hole and unfortunately, they're homogeneously distributed to every part of our earth! 😅 They live in small villages and big cities and they come in all shapes
I loved the picture of a dog peeing! I think this proves that the humans are smarter than the AI! Love to you all!
Chatgpt can speak Hindi
Cruel money 06