You have to commend these test/pilots for their skill, but most of all their 'extreme' courage knowing that if a test maneuver goes wrong, they just can't eject themselves from that flight cabin as if they were in a fighter jet. Total respect!.
Having to eject isn’t pleasant though. Often pilots end up with broken ribs etc. depending on the circumstances of course. They know the risk of course. Its that doesn’t make it the safety net most think it is. There is a serious risk of injury even still. You are in a car crash in the air lol. Simply ejecting. It’s equivalent. Even with the seat belt and all the safety measures. The forces at play. They would absolutely prefer not to eject. (Sounds like a duh but no. If they have to eject it’s gonna suck)
Back in the 80s, I was taking off from the Denver airport (Stapleton at the time) in a Continental Airlines DC 9 when the starboard engine ingested parts of a tire that blew after their abort point. After a loud pop, the man sitting next to me, who happened to be a pilot on a different airline, explained to me that we probably blew a rear tire, and bits of it were ingested into the engine (on that plane, the engines were located not on the wing but on the fuselage behind the rear landing gear), causing it to shut down. He calmly explained to me that the plane was totally capable of flying with only one engine, and that we would circle back and land at the same airport. No problem. I wasn't so calm, nor were the other passengers that also heard the loud pop. The take off, now with only one engine, seemed perfectly normal to me. When it was time to land, the pilot expertly put the plane down first on the side with the good tires, then the nose wheel touched down, then the damaged wheels were ever so gently put down. Fire trucks followed us as we landed; when the plane went to turn off the runway, the other tire on the damaged side popped and went flat. That stopped the plane in its tracks. A bus came to offload the passengers, and as we deplaned the pilot greeted us all. I asked if he would be the pilot on our replacement aircraft; he said he would be. I told him I was glad that he would be flying the next aircraft and praised him and his crew for their expert handling of the situation. We would all be late getting to our destinations, but we'd still be alive. Long story short - modern jet aircraft can certainly take off and fly with only one engine!
Note - Airbus is not a French company. It's multinational, with many countries taking part as well as France. Germany, the UK and Spain are the other three major members.
I remember when they tested a 747 at Dublin airport years ago with vertical climbs, dives, and all round crazy maneuvers. It was some time after the El Al Flight 1862 disaster in Holland. They where testing out new pins (the cause of the crash in Holland) on the engines and pushing that 747 to its limits. A friend worked in the airport at the time and had heard it was going to happen, and what time. He let us know, and we all got as close as we could to the airport when the time came. Jaw dropping stuff, and i was blown away that a 747 could actually fly the way it did.
Basically what happened is that the pilots that tested the 737max family knew the new technology emcas works so they knew how to deal with it when it happened. The issue was that they didnt tell theirs customers about it and when they encountered the problems they couldn't do anything to take control of the aircraft. Still shame on boing. Doesn't mean the 737 max is a bad airplane.
Boing saved $1M per aircraft sold by fudging the facts about mcas system and not making pilot retraining mandatory. Greed was the ultimate reason for the 737Max accidents, not the plane. It's disgusting that it wasn't considered manslaughter.
Gotta correct you on something. The tires on aircraft undergoing rejected takeoff testing are not deflated by ground crews, they automatically deflate by way of 'blowout plugs' on the wheels that are designed to release the pressure in an overheated tire to prevent the TIRE from blowing out. Just wanted to clarify that.
@@KUNERSTACH Yeah, he got there before me too, it appears the temporal flux capacitors hit their limit and caused quantum phased nanofluids to leak onto the biphasic pulse modulating regulator array causing systemic discombobulation.
Also bare in mind these vertical climbs in commercial aircraft are with no pax, baggage and often minimum fuel, so they’re far lighter. Much more difficult to achieve when weighed down but that doesn’t mean they aren’t stable or safe, they absolutely are. It’s just far more difficult to vertically climb aircraft when it’s bogged down with everything. Military aircraft are a completely different breed though. They can do a lot more when weighed down.
I think the most important point is that even unloaded and just for show, it doesn't climb even near vertically. It's a trick with the camera perspective. I don't know the exact true climb angle, maybe around 50°.
This is what people forget about airplanes not only are they incredibly safe machines but there tested in ways that they will never have to go threw with passengers on board like extreme vertical take off or near loopings during flight and corckscrews . Airplanes truely are magnificent machines .
I experienced such an "emergency" once, right before landing at Gatwick airport in London. We were 2 minutes away from touchdown when the airplane got a message about another airplane taking off from the same airstrip, and without any warning, the airplane went into full acceleration and pulled straight up (even though it might have been way less dramatic than what they're displaying in this clip). Anyways, we didn't get an explanation from the captain until we leveled off, circled around and again prepared for landing.
Same experience, at the same airport, maybe we were in the same flight! Meanwhile, my wife was checking the flight on FlightRadar, and was "disturbed" by the strange behavior of the airplane...
A couple of points here about the 747-8 RTO tests. It was loaded to max take off weight, equipped with fully worn down brakes, and could only use the brakes and spoilers to stop, no reverse thrust or other control inputs. Also once the plane comes to a complete stop a 5 minute timer is started and only after that 5 mins has expired are firefighters allowed to cool the brakes with hoses. The tires automatically deflate to prevent them from exploding and killing passengers/first responders and also to protect the plane itself.
A plane can fly fine on a single engine. Two engines mean the engines aren’t being pushed hard all the time and extends their lifetime. You could have an engine failure and theoretically continue to your destination without any issue, but that isn’t done in case you did lose your last engine, regardless of how extremely unlikely that is in this circumstance. An engine failure really is rarely cause for concern. They’ll just find the nearest suitable airport but they won’t be rushing down to the ground, there’s no need for it. They’ll do the necessary checklists, best airport and then begin to begin their approach to land. A fire is a completely different ball game. You don’t want to hear those bells.
I read somewhere that the altitude “hold” was set at zero feet. On the initial climb with a positive climb rate initiated they flipped the autopilot on and since it was set at “0” the aircraft began to descend. As I said, I read this somewhere and I’m just “passing on” what I read.
Seen a vertical stabiliser of an airliner tested. Huge hydraulic cylinders pushed the poor thing up and down. Squeek squeek squeek and 24-7. Doing one year of heavy weather in one week, or so. Now that is impressive testing. And this crucial airplane part did perform as designed.
I'm curious about the current thoughts of the captains who made this test. Is there any chance of an accident somewhere in their head? How do they deal with this psychology? interesting job. very difficult.
I don't think I'll ever get over my fear of flying sadly. I've only flown once and it was a horrible experience with extreme turbulence and an odd event that freaked us out. We apparently hit an airstream (??) from another airplane that was in front of us I think (I don't remember exact details or what the pilot said; I just remember something about an airstream). Anyways, the plane kind of dropped down a little bit (maybe like 10 feet?) but it happened in a split second. Think of a quick bunny hill on a rollercoaster. I remember seeing everyone lift up in their seats and women's hair flying upward. It happened SO quickly. It felt like we hit a giant wall of air that knocked the plane downward. It was terrifying. I know planes are safe. Just like rollercoasters are safe. Accidents are exceedingly rare. But my fear is rooted in fear of heights. And having an anxiety disorder doesn't help LOL
You can take solace in knowing these machines can handle astronomically worse conditions than the average turbulence which freaks out passengers. They can take off vertical, fly through hurricanes, go upside down. Planes are incredibly safe for day to day transportation.
I am a anxious flyer aswell, but paradoxically video of Mentour Pilot about accident reports helped me A LOT! I know so much more about the inner workings of an airplane now, about its ridiculous amount of abundance and how the aviation industry steadily improves to make flying safer and safer. Maybe it can help you too mate
The "vertical takeoff" is an everyday event at John Wayne Airport in Orange County CA. I love to watch the reactions of first-timers. Even though they make an announcement about the unusual flight path before takeoff, a lot of them still freak out.
When the pilot pulls back on the throttle at 2500 feet that always freaks me out at that place! You feel like you’re falling out of the sky and going backwards for a second! 😂
The purpose of any pre-commissioning and commissioning tests are to test the extreme condition performance along with normal general operating performance of the equipment. This is true and very required to ensure reliability. For equipment that is related to safety of people, the more strict and harsh the tests be, the better it is, than pulling favours to skip tests.
@@denisanony5801it was funded 50 percent by France, Germany, turbines are made in the UK, much of the technicalities in Germany and it is assembled in France. Look at the former CEO, chairmen and wich companies contributed to the founding and tell me again that it is french. Maybe superficially or in the name of arrogance.
Very Interesting and informative.,it's nice to know that Boeing and Airbus test these aircraft's in such a really tough and thorough way . To prove safety and durability of the aircraft's.
My heart goes out to everyone working in the airline industry pilots flight attendants ATC everyone involved yall are extremely courageous people to ensure the safety of others thank yall so much for what yall do 🥺💕
Estupendos vídeos!! enhorabuena!! es una pena que los que no dominamos el inglés, no entendamos los comentarios para poder completar lo instructivos que resultan estos cortos de grandísima calidad que nos ofreces... por lo que sugiero la posibilidad de añadirles subtitulos para hacerlos mucho más comprensibles. Sería posible?. Muchas gracias.
The best story I heard I actually read. In the 50s in the Seattle area before bridges were built over Lake Washington and the towns on the east side were sleepy and not where the homes of people working in Seattle were located, commercial jets were just being tested. And I think of someone out on Lake Washington midweek fishing and seeing this strange big plane with jet engines coming and watching as it did a BARREL ROLL. And when it got to the end of the lake it turned around and came back doing another BARREL ROLL. It was a Boeing plane being tested (Boeing there is located between Seattle and Tacoma). As a person who came of age with the commercial jet, I can't even conceive of seeing a big strange plane flying over my head and doing a barrel roll. And who would believe me if I told them?
There are temperature sensitive plugs in the wheel rim that melt due to the high brake temperatures thus deflating the tires. Without this they will catastrophically explode.
"Company has been highly regarded for its commitment to testing" Yeah, 737 Max never existed 346 people did not die and Boeing did not cut corners in design to get faster approval from FAA
Airbus is not a French company, it's a company founded by three Germans and a Frenchman, it's a European company after the merger of German DaimlerChrysler Aerospace, French Aérospatiale Matra and Spanish CASA.
Airbus is NOT "a French company" my friend (I'm sorry). It's an european consortium with several national contributions : Germany, Italy, Spain, Holland etc.. and France indeed 😉
I absolutely admire everyone involved in aircraft construction and aviation. I am no expert of course, but I do wish, that in the future they'll be able to construct even safer airplanes and prevent all worst case scenarios, given the fact that airplane crashes are so horrific. I live near an airport, I travel too often, but flying always stresses me out a lot.
You have to commend these test/pilots for their skill, but most of all their 'extreme' courage knowing that if a test maneuver goes wrong, they just can't eject themselves from that flight cabin as if they were in a fighter jet. Total respect!.
For some reason the image of passenger jets having ejection seats is hilarious to me
@@crying2emoji5 Precisely. Them having the 'courage' knowing that would 'not' be an option.
⁸
Having to eject isn’t pleasant though. Often pilots end up with broken ribs etc. depending on the circumstances of course. They know the risk of course. Its that doesn’t make it the safety net most think it is. There is a serious risk of injury even still. You are in a car crash in the air lol. Simply ejecting. It’s equivalent. Even with the seat belt and all the safety measures. The forces at play. They would absolutely prefer not to eject. (Sounds like a duh but no. If they have to eject it’s gonna suck)
@@Lyrikal757 and whats the alternative? burn in jetfule?
Back in the 80s, I was taking off from the Denver airport (Stapleton at the time) in a Continental Airlines DC 9 when the starboard engine ingested parts of a tire that blew after their abort point. After a loud pop, the man sitting next to me, who happened to be a pilot on a different airline, explained to me that we probably blew a rear tire, and bits of it were ingested into the engine (on that plane, the engines were located not on the wing but on the fuselage behind the rear landing gear), causing it to shut down.
He calmly explained to me that the plane was totally capable of flying with only one engine, and that we would circle back and land at the same airport. No problem. I wasn't so calm, nor were the other passengers that also heard the loud pop. The take off, now with only one engine, seemed perfectly normal to me. When it was time to land, the pilot expertly put the plane down first on the side with the good tires, then the nose wheel touched down, then the damaged wheels were ever so gently put down. Fire trucks followed us as we landed; when the plane went to turn off the runway, the other tire on the damaged side popped and went flat. That stopped the plane in its tracks. A bus came to offload the passengers, and as we deplaned the pilot greeted us all. I asked if he would be the pilot on our replacement aircraft; he said he would be. I told him I was glad that he would be flying the next aircraft and praised him and his crew for their expert handling of the situation. We would all be late getting to our destinations, but we'd still be alive.
Long story short - modern jet aircraft can certainly take off and fly with only one engine!
DC9 was kinda a cute thing...
That’s a story not many can tell but you are lucky to have experienced that and learned something new; a feat we all should do daily!
great story!
@Quazzy Modo smart ass
I like this story. That keeping cool guys are an amazing company anytime.
Seeing a commercial airliner doing a near-vertical takeoff has to be one of the most badass things ever😮
SOOO COOOL!!! What a time to be alive.
please look up what "vertical takeoff" means.
I would LOVE to be on that flight.
In the fifties my school was close to a RAF Vulcan bomber airfield.
I live in Moses Lake, where Boeing does most of its aircraft testing. I never get tired of seeing aircraft doing crazy stuff!
As a plane I can confirm we are afraid of these tests
so sorry for u guys
As a fighter jet I say haha pu**y
You need to unionise and lobby for OHS officers.
We mzee 😂
I feel your plane my brother
Thank you to all pilots, engineers and everyone involved doing their jobs, such a huge and important responsibility
Note - Airbus is not a French company. It's multinational, with many countries taking part as well as France. Germany, the UK and Spain are the other three major members.
America isn't taking part?
@@erikford7959 I don't think so
@@erikford7959no its a european company, america has boeing
@@riverjhin Dang boeing sucks
@@erikford7959 yeah
I remember when they tested a 747 at Dublin airport years ago with vertical climbs, dives, and all round crazy maneuvers. It was some time after the El Al Flight 1862 disaster in Holland. They where testing out new pins (the cause of the crash in Holland) on the engines and pushing that 747 to its limits. A friend worked in the airport at the time and had heard it was going to happen, and what time. He let us know, and we all got as close as we could to the airport when the time came. Jaw dropping stuff, and i was blown away that a 747 could actually fly the way it did.
Must have been a sight to behold! Was any footage taken at the time or is there something similar of the 747?
@@GG_Booboo Ive never seen any. It was years ago, and if anyone has footage, it would be Dublin airport.
Massive respect for the test pilots
Don't forget the flight test engineers 😊
A like for all these test pilots and hats off to them.
@Dino 😂😂
@Dino Well that's a dumb attitude. They're probably much more professional and disciplined than you. Accidents can happen to anyone.
@@sir_john_hammond aeroperu would like to laugh
Highly regarded for its "commitment to testing", What happened with the Max then? Uh huh... they got lazy and cut corners.
Boeing should of got jail time for the people in charge and not just a slap on the wrist
You mean “should have” right?
Max is engine replacement only right?same aircraft.been test on old engine not new.correct me if im wrong
Basically what happened is that the pilots that tested the 737max family knew the new technology emcas works so they knew how to deal with it when it happened. The issue was that they didnt tell theirs customers about it and when they encountered the problems they couldn't do anything to take control of the aircraft. Still shame on boing. Doesn't mean the 737 max is a bad airplane.
Boing saved $1M per aircraft sold by fudging the facts about mcas system and not making pilot retraining mandatory. Greed was the ultimate reason for the 737Max accidents, not the plane. It's disgusting that it wasn't considered manslaughter.
Gotta correct you on something. The tires on aircraft undergoing rejected takeoff testing are not deflated by ground crews, they automatically deflate by way of 'blowout plugs' on the wheels that are designed to release the pressure in an overheated tire to prevent the TIRE from blowing out. Just wanted to clarify that.
i wanted to say this too
⁷X ass eeĺ tX awW
@@KUNERSTACH Yeah, he got there before me too, it appears the temporal flux capacitors hit their limit and caused quantum phased nanofluids to leak onto the biphasic pulse modulating regulator array causing systemic discombobulation.
@@formertenant9276 Nah .... I reckon it was a faulty turbo encabulator.
@@brumbymg You guys are fools and need to brush up on your quantum physics
I think it’s impressive how maneuverable such a large bird is
4:27 Airbus is certainly not a "French" company! It is an European multinational company with production in Germany, France, UK and Spain!
Great cameraman filming from mid air!
Gotta give the test pilots such huge props for doing what they gotta do.
No pun intended ;-)
@@Jezusbeznogi haha. I didnt even clue in to what i said
Also bare in mind these vertical climbs in commercial aircraft are with no pax, baggage and often minimum fuel, so they’re far lighter. Much more difficult to achieve when weighed down but that doesn’t mean they aren’t stable or safe, they absolutely are. It’s just far more difficult to vertically climb aircraft when it’s bogged down with everything.
Military aircraft are a completely different breed though. They can do a lot more when weighed down.
Hey Einstein, it "bear" in mind, not "bare" as in naked kind of bare !!!
@@TheBargainMan Hey Sherlock, It's "It's 'bears in mind" not "it" as in singular.
@Squid Cena hey buddy, it's 'bear in mind', not 'bears in mind', no need for subject/verb agreement here.
@@TheBargainMan So it's bear as the often large, furry animal. OK, I've got it but I tend to think more of beer.
I think the most important point is that even unloaded and just for show, it doesn't climb even near vertically. It's a trick with the camera perspective. I don't know the exact true climb angle, maybe around 50°.
Can't imagine a world without planes,amazing tech experience, respect 👏 🙏
its crazy how the plane can even take off when the pilots have such massive balls to perform these types of turns and take offs
This is what people forget about airplanes not only are they incredibly safe machines but there tested in ways that they will never have to go threw with passengers on board like extreme vertical take off or near loopings during flight and corckscrews . Airplanes truely are magnificent machines .
I really appreciate how much work is done to put together such magnificent planes 😍
and air pollution
@@FadedLightXx barely a scratch on the surface compared to other forms of transport. Airliners are very efficient per person.
I experienced such an "emergency" once, right before landing at Gatwick airport in London. We were 2 minutes away from touchdown when the airplane got a message about another airplane taking off from the same airstrip, and without any warning, the airplane went into full acceleration and pulled straight up (even though it might have been way less dramatic than what they're displaying in this clip). Anyways, we didn't get an explanation from the captain until we leveled off, circled around and again prepared for landing.
Thanks, I was curious as to what kind of emergency would require such a maneuver.
Wow you lot were lucky.
Same experience, at the same airport, maybe we were in the same flight! Meanwhile, my wife was checking the flight on FlightRadar, and was "disturbed" by the strange behavior of the airplane...
@@Tactic3dmaybe you guys just flew in when the trainees were working in the ATC tower.
😁@@tomtom1541
I’m fascinated by airplanes, such amazing machines.
A couple of points here about the 747-8 RTO tests. It was loaded to max take off weight, equipped with fully worn down brakes, and could only use the brakes and spoilers to stop, no reverse thrust or other control inputs. Also once the plane comes to a complete stop a 5 minute timer is started and only after that 5 mins has expired are firefighters allowed to cool the brakes with hoses. The tires automatically deflate to prevent them from exploding and killing passengers/first responders and also to protect the plane itself.
i just watched a video where they did such a test on an A340, and in that one several tires exploded. i guess that was a fail then.
0:07 big monster chasing after its prey
A plane can fly fine on a single engine. Two engines mean the engines aren’t being pushed hard all the time and extends their lifetime. You could have an engine failure and theoretically continue to your destination without any issue, but that isn’t done in case you did lose your last engine, regardless of how extremely unlikely that is in this circumstance.
An engine failure really is rarely cause for concern. They’ll just find the nearest suitable airport but they won’t be rushing down to the ground, there’s no need for it. They’ll do the necessary checklists, best airport and then begin to begin their approach to land.
A fire is a completely different ball game. You don’t want to hear those bells.
I read somewhere that the altitude “hold” was set at zero feet. On the initial climb with a positive climb rate initiated they flipped the autopilot on and since it was set at “0” the aircraft began to descend.
As I said, I read this somewhere and I’m just “passing on” what I read.
**Pilot flies vertically**
**Wing snaps off**
Pilot: "can confirm, plane is not usable"
Seen a vertical stabiliser of an airliner tested. Huge hydraulic cylinders pushed the poor thing up and down. Squeek squeek squeek and 24-7. Doing one year of heavy weather in one week, or so. Now that is impressive testing. And this crucial airplane part did perform as designed.
I'm curious about the current thoughts of the captains who made this test. Is there any chance of an accident somewhere in their head? How do they deal with this psychology? interesting job. very difficult.
Boeing has left the chat
Haha
Your comment popped up just as he mentioned Boeing. You owe me 20 seconds, because i burst out laughing, and had to rewind a bit.
I'm even more impressed with the skill of pilots and engineers after watching this!
Very interesting, and informative.
Excellent content! Great video and rendering analysis.
Wow that’s crazy! I never would have thought that jet could take off at that angle and so early.
Anyone here after Boeing fell apart?
🤚
👋🏻
NOBODY is here because a boeing fell apart.
😂
What boeing?
The A400 can do incredible manouvers - proceeds to not show these manouvers and instead shows the plane flying straight
3:19 unless there was a serious emergency..... crazy to think a pilot may actually do this.... just like alright we're going to space now folks
I don't think I'll ever get over my fear of flying sadly. I've only flown once and it was a horrible experience with extreme turbulence and an odd event that freaked us out. We apparently hit an airstream (??) from another airplane that was in front of us I think (I don't remember exact details or what the pilot said; I just remember something about an airstream). Anyways, the plane kind of dropped down a little bit (maybe like 10 feet?) but it happened in a split second. Think of a quick bunny hill on a rollercoaster. I remember seeing everyone lift up in their seats and women's hair flying upward. It happened SO quickly. It felt like we hit a giant wall of air that knocked the plane downward. It was terrifying.
I know planes are safe. Just like rollercoasters are safe. Accidents are exceedingly rare. But my fear is rooted in fear of heights. And having an anxiety disorder doesn't help LOL
Jack and coke usually calms my nerves. Also just imagine you’re on a boat in the ocean during turbulence
You can take solace in knowing these machines can handle astronomically worse conditions than the average turbulence which freaks out passengers. They can take off vertical, fly through hurricanes, go upside down. Planes are incredibly safe for day to day transportation.
I am a anxious flyer aswell, but paradoxically video of Mentour Pilot about accident reports helped me A LOT! I know so much more about the inner workings of an airplane now, about its ridiculous amount of abundance and how the aviation industry steadily improves to make flying safer and safer. Maybe it can help you too mate
That was so awesome!! Also I wish I could've went along for the ride, what a rollercoaster!
The "vertical takeoff" is an everyday event at John Wayne Airport in Orange County CA. I love to watch the reactions of first-timers. Even though they make an announcement about the unusual flight path before takeoff, a lot of them still freak out.
You're 100% right, I have flown out of John Wayne before.
Its a slight vertical and a drift, Not no where steep as flight Test
When the pilot pulls back on the throttle at 2500 feet that always freaks me out at that place! You feel like you’re falling out of the sky and going backwards for a second! 😂
Stall all
Those dreamliner engines look cartoonish
Cool video, I may just have to watch one. 👍
2:50 for the vertical take off you came to see
Pilots are incredible!!
great video 👍
The purpose of any pre-commissioning and commissioning tests are to test the extreme condition performance along with normal general operating performance of the equipment. This is true and very required to ensure reliability. For equipment that is related to safety of people, the more strict and harsh the tests be, the better it is, than pulling favours to skip tests.
This guy wins the award for the amount of times he can say ‘test the aircraft before use’ in different ways. Get. On. With. It.
*number of times. You. Simpleton.
2:28 that aged like butter, lol.
Nice video.
Thanks for this documentary really enjoyed watching it
The bad ass workers who worked for Alaska Airlines in Seattle already showed all viewers what Boeing airplanes are capable of doing.
Unfortunately, the even more badassed bean counters have totally destroyed their reputation, such is corporate greed
Excellent video! Thank you for creating and posting!!
Airbus isn’t French. It’s a consortium of French, German, British and other European nations.
Airbus was founded by Sud-Aviation (French company), is assembled in France, managed by a French, and its largest shareholder is France
@@denisanony5801it was funded 50 percent by France, Germany, turbines are made in the UK, much of the technicalities in Germany and it is assembled in France. Look at the former CEO, chairmen and wich companies contributed to the founding and tell me again that it is french. Maybe superficially or in the name of arrogance.
Wht a meaningful video, must watch
Did Boeing do the same testing on its 737 Max? Some of the tests shown would have found the MCAS issues .
you can see that it IS a 737 MAX!
@@jujuloustic are you sure? I thought it is a 777X
All of the people involved in this kind of stuff make my line of work seem so petty and insignificant. These people are fantastic!
Good video. Talking about cruel tests, it is also worth mentioning couple of other tests such as wing bending test and engine blade blow off test.
Very good, thanks ;)
Cruelly tested? Didn’t know planes had feelings 😂
Your way of narrating this vid is a reason in it self for watching.( nice an calm)✌
thats cool, try vertical landing too
Happy to see home with cold weather testing in Iqaluit ❤
G’day as usual a very interesting and something you would know about, the best thing that I ever did on Facebook was to subscribe. Regards John
Very Interesting! Thank you
Do they test this at weighted capacity as well?
Very Interesting and informative.,it's nice to know that Boeing and Airbus test these aircraft's in such a really tough and thorough way . To prove safety and durability of the aircraft's.
My heart goes out to everyone working in the airline industry pilots flight attendants ATC everyone involved yall are extremely courageous people to ensure the safety of others thank yall so much for what yall do 🥺💕
RIP to all the hero test pilots that have died in the name of scientific research and safety.
Try to do vertical takeoff with the plane fully loaded... that would be FUN
"Cruelly tested". Those poor aircraft, being cruel to them is downright mean. Solidarity with airplanes, stop Aircraft testing now!
Thank you for another great informative video
Estupendos vídeos!! enhorabuena!! es una pena que los que no dominamos el inglés, no entendamos los comentarios para poder completar lo instructivos que resultan estos cortos de grandísima calidad que nos ofreces... por lo que sugiero la posibilidad de añadirles subtitulos para hacerlos mucho más comprensibles. Sería posible?. Muchas gracias.
Taco Bell !!!
Красивая речь диктора - британский английский всегда приятно слушать.
Vertical climb is somewhat interesting. would love to see a 360 degree barrel roll.
that would be somethin
That was informative and interesting thanks for sharing
The best story I heard I actually read. In the 50s in the Seattle area before bridges were built over Lake Washington and the towns on the east side were sleepy and not where the homes of people working in Seattle were located, commercial jets were just being tested. And I think of someone out on Lake Washington midweek fishing and seeing this strange big plane with jet engines coming and watching as it did a BARREL ROLL. And when it got to the end of the lake it turned around and came back doing another BARREL ROLL. It was a Boeing plane being tested (Boeing there is located between Seattle and Tacoma). As a person who came of age with the commercial jet, I can't even conceive of seeing a big strange plane flying over my head and doing a barrel roll. And who would believe me if I told them?
Ngl that looks like a really fun job. "Here's a new aircraft, go put it through the wringer!"
"Boeing likes to know what its planes can do." Apparently not with the 737 max
Ah, yes! Boeing: the final word when it comes to safety. 😬
They can deflate tires from cockpit?
There are temperature sensitive plugs in the wheel rim that melt due to the high brake temperatures thus deflating the tires. Without this they will catastrophically explode.
@@Henry-vb4hq Amazing engineering. Thanks for that. 👍🏾
Well done, thanks
Those engines are insanely powerful. The plane can continue to fly with just one. 😮
I'd like to strap a couple of those bad boys in the bed of my truck and see how fast I could go..
WONDER ! BEAUTIFUL !
"Company has been highly regarded for its commitment to testing" Yeah, 737 Max never existed 346 people did not die and Boeing did not cut corners in design to get faster approval from FAA
I thought the same thing as soon as I noticed the topic of the video
Ignorant comment
@@TheSultan1470 what are you smoking bruh? Pretty sure its some fine quality stuff
@@TheSultan1470 what does that have to do with ignorant?
Is this kind of testing done for each ✈️ plane or of few when new model comes
Airbus is not a French company, it's a company founded by three Germans and a Frenchman, it's a European company after the merger of German DaimlerChrysler Aerospace, French Aérospatiale Matra and Spanish CASA.
Amazing machines.
boeing can do vertical landings too
Their thrust to weight ratio must be incredible
these engines are no joke, respect to the engineers
Airbus is NOT "a French company" my friend (I'm sorry).
It's an european consortium with several national contributions : Germany, Italy, Spain, Holland etc.. and France indeed 😉
... and the UK. The wings are made here 👍
@@matthewfranklin7541 Absolutely, sorry for the UK 👑
Always love seeing that vertical takeoff from that blue Vietnam airlines plane from the Paris Air Show back in 2014
Boeing highly regarded?? seriously??..have you forgotten 737 MAX episodes???
Boeing isn't even highly regarded in South Carolina as a job
"Vertical takeoff" is not the same as a rolling takeoff into a vertical climb out.
I can imagine the conversation with the insurance company. You gunna do whaaaaat?😅😅😅😅
dude takes a lot of pauses for every sentence , so annoying
Your attention span is just bad
@@tabeabussmann yes, recently i got diagnosed with adhd
Good Job👍👍👍
I don't believe an inanimate object can be treated cruelly.
is it not basic knowledge that they mean “harsh tests”
Wow fascinating!
"Vertical take off" - I must have blinked and missed it.
I absolutely admire everyone involved in aircraft construction and aviation. I am no expert of course, but I do wish, that in the future they'll be able to construct even safer airplanes and prevent all worst case scenarios, given the fact that airplane crashes are so horrific. I live near an airport, I travel too often, but flying always stresses me out a lot.
why is there a minute of silence after every 5 words wtf
maybe you should stop watching shorts and tiktoks
Wow, you have serious attention issues. Turn off TH-cam and tiktok and go outside.
The most exciting part, the ending at US Military lab was the shortest part. WHY?