Does Heeramandi Get Everything Wrong Or Is There Any Saving Grace? | Spoiler Alert

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 874

  • @SomethingHaute
    @SomethingHaute  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Watch Double Trouble Ep 4: bit.ly/3V9G5QI

  • @sadaf9975
    @sadaf9975 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    You guys are very concerned about getting right actors who can speak the urdu or punjabi language . However, you both defended Mahira khan like anything in Maula Jatt, where she completely did a disservice to this punjabi character and language

  • @mitalibhende8266
    @mitalibhende8266 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +214

    SLB is not known for realistic anything..... Devdas' set looks nothing like a village in Bengal, Gangubai sets are grand and look nothing like the actual Kamathipura, Bajirao Mastani's set looks nothing like the actual Shanivarwada (according to historians Bajirao Peshwa made it a point to keep it modest) I don't think Heeramandi was ever intended to look like the real Heeramandi. I agree, they should have worked on the character development but I have had this complaint with almost all SLB projects post Black.

    • @Hetal28
      @Hetal28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yes very rightly pointed out
      He’s very grandeur loving director nothing real

    • @Umama2289
      @Umama2289 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I haven't seen the series, but it didn't look that grand to me? More of a drab, grayish touch. Like a dead Lahore, though it is and was anything but.

    • @alkag1726
      @alkag1726 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      you have put it all exactly as I would.

    • @mehakriaz1588
      @mehakriaz1588 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Complaint?! When he told you or promised he would make a documentary on heera mandi?!

    • @gerryburntwood9617
      @gerryburntwood9617 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      But they are delicious to watch! I watch them as a guilty pleasure taking off my critic hat!😸!

  • @nandinishah1709
    @nandinishah1709 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +108

    I disagree. I think Manisha Koirala was amazing as Mallikajaan. Hers was the strongest performance, and she literally carried the show. Other characters fell flat somehow.

  • @aishafatemakhan6176
    @aishafatemakhan6176 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    I'm surprised you didn't mention 'Ustaadji' played by Indaresh Malik. He delivered a great performance.

    • @maidahsafdar3561
      @maidahsafdar3561 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree with you.. The performance was very impactful.

  • @umamahato13
    @umamahato13 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    It was not independent india flag.please read history. There was charkha not chakra in the middle., in 1931, a seven-member flag committee was established in Karachi to modify the flag and they had given a new design.

    • @jamaisvu3786
      @jamaisvu3786 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then what about mentioning 15th August? And there was no mention of Quaid-e-Azam Jinnah or Iqbal ir Pakistan. Are you telling me that a few years before independence no one would’ve mentioned Pakistan in Lahore?

    • @Zecos
      @Zecos 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Please stop trying to cover it its just embarrassing. This show very CLEARLY and very INTENTLY disregarded the Pakistan movement. The creators were biased and chose to rewrite history just to make a point that Pakistan is irrelevant to the subcontinent, when the story itself is based in Pakistan smh. Poor.

    • @nationalist7347
      @nationalist7347 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jamaisvu3786😂😂 Jinnah was taking retirement enjoying in England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 trying to become a MP in English House of Lords 😂 while Gandhi Nehru were in jail…Gandhi for 15 years and Nehru for 10 year and Savarkar for 20 years

    • @nationalist7347
      @nationalist7347 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Zecos😂😂 in 1930 Jinnah was in England enjoying English wine and trying to become a MP in English House of Lords while Gandhi and Nehru were in a jail for 10 years😂

    • @Zecos
      @Zecos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nationalist7347 nah Gandhi wasn’t in jail… he was too busy grooming minors in South Africa ;)

  • @zahrasheriff
    @zahrasheriff 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    so guys...yours is probably the only pak. show on content that I watch...appreciated it! you guys are spot on and pick on significant topics discursively. Now, for the first time, after watching this review of yours for Heeramandi, I have comments / suggestion / feedback for you :
    1) yes, it was good you reviewed the full series together! Would not have made sense to review episodes separately.
    2) yes, your views are noted, and agreed to a great extent...
    3) now the BUT -- your voice and tone may have been a little less critical had you not been in a position where you watch such a series in one go...within 24 hours...and then sat down to review it as well, in that span of time...sorry guys, thora injustice ho gaya hai...
    4) series was intense for a full-on 8-episodes' watch in one go. I saw it in 2-parts...and at the end, was moved to go back to check on epi. 2 for story consistency...and felt it quite attractive. Story-telling and characters were strong!
    5) why judge the entire cast to be the B-graders in terms of actors...that was very harsh!
    6) Amna mentioned this was fantasy-fiction...that is what your overall review missed upon. Along with the name Heeramandi, the sub-title was The Diamond Bazaar...which brings forth the sense of sparkle - chamak - sparkle! It was an exaggerated, out of the world show of dazzle, grandeur in fantasy fiction, OTT platform. Nothing to do with depicting Lahore...and its past...and nothing to do with Pak. dramas...I get it...I get the correlation and comparison to the process of Jackson Heights, but to me, that was unnecessary guys....
    7) you ruin it by comparing it with SLB movies...format was different and kudos to him for that!
    probably the longest comment I've ever written online...I'll stop here :)
    Keep it up!

    • @Devine-oi9vn
      @Devine-oi9vn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well thought out response. Absolutely agree!

    • @mayacreations3472
      @mayacreations3472 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      the diamond bazaar is actually the literal translation of heeramandi

    • @prabhsharankaur5113
      @prabhsharankaur5113 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      YESSS Point 6 literally

  • @horseridingwithme5168
    @horseridingwithme5168 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    I beg to disagree. I really found the series great and it gave a beautiful message of how women want liberation like the citizens want liberation from the British. Also the last scene was beautiful and even the song

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      They failed to understand that is a story about liberation from oppression in the broader sense of the word. Focusing on any religion, culture, city or state in the review is the wrong take in my opinion.

    • @ZahoorAhmad-2475
      @ZahoorAhmad-2475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@AdilAzharKhanexactly..

  • @DDUTTA
    @DDUTTA 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    lahore was important base for Indian freedom struggle and Jinnah was not the face of freedom movement, the first Indian flag was raised in Lahore during freedom movement by Nehru and a lahori would not take his name???secondly do you even know about Bhagat Sing and how many unites of freedom fighters was secretly operating in Lahore

    • @kanikaarora2316
      @kanikaarora2316 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Too much to expect from them.And yes they don't know about Bhagat Singh,as they have read their own pirated version.

    • @MariamLary
      @MariamLary 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree. Just like people who came from India to Pakistan, were campaigning for Pakistan right?! Just like that people living in Lahore would have been campaigning for India? Whats wrong with that? Completely justified

    • @DDUTTA
      @DDUTTA 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MariamLary its much more than that,nobody leave thier land to become a refugee unless they are forced to or unless you are well to do,but very few percentage of people would have the luxery to move to different land and built new home,these entire "campaigning" were for political workers and people with vested interest, no common lay person would want their land ,thier home vanished

  • @nitashetty2214
    @nitashetty2214 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +90

    How come you both have completely overlooked Richa Chadha as Lajjo? She was the only character who you felt sorry for.

    • @amibatth
      @amibatth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Because this review is not very logical and reasonable. Generally these two are quite reasonable but since bansali used the word lahore , most of the pakistani artist and these critics have a huge problem with this. They forgot to enjoy the series !!

    • @wizzcraft14
      @wizzcraft14 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@amibatth no, the review is logical. The storytelling of the show sucks.

    • @mdanyal2394
      @mdanyal2394 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Storytelling is vert weak, but Richa’s acting was fantastic. Her dance performance was mind blowing

  • @showstopperz111
    @showstopperz111 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Reviewing it like a documentary speaks volumes about the calibre of these reviewers...

  • @mekhlachakrabarti1695
    @mekhlachakrabarti1695 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Respectfully disagreeing with your rather harsh review . High points ( for me as a viewer ) The sets were stunning and so what if SLB has done superb sets before …let’s appreciate the nuanced and exquisite details of This set . The actors and their Urdu pronunciation is for Indian non Urdu speaking audiences ( we couldn’t really tell if it was wanting and we could Comprehend it ) …I believe there were dialogue coaches and the actors tried hard to get it right acc to the interviews they gave . Urdu wasn’t t their first or second language let’s not forget . In an 8 part series every actor cant give brilliant performances…Sonakshi and Aditi , Taha and even Richa Chaddha were fab imo . The music and songs were beautiful….in a web series you will never find A memorable song ….the formula is simply different . The music blended with the aesthetic of the movie v nicely …
    The best part for me was the portrayal of strong women ..every one of the female characters …so even if the reviewers feel the story , setting, historical authenticity etc etc aren’t up to the mark….cant deny that the makers of this series have given the audiences so many compelling female characters
    Overall it was a fantastic watch …the audience doesn’t pick apart every nuance or fault of any production..it’s all about what you feel when you’re watching and after you have watched it . For me…felt entertained thoroughly and a tad proud that we in India have directors , d o p s , actors , set designers, costume designers , script writers etc etc etc who can deliver an aesthetic and scale of production as this . Well done team Heeramandi 😊

  • @TrendingToday5555
    @TrendingToday5555 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Hey H&A! I watch your show regularly and really look forward to your reviews! But I have a few points on this one - while I agree 1000% with the points about diction and performances - but I feel like wrt the historic POV I feel like you guys reviewed it with a very myopic POV - instead of finding so many faults related to historic facts, you would have enjoyed more if you would kept that aside. SLB sets and production is grand and is barely realistic … it’s just about enjoying the performance and grandiose 😊

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Exactly. I don't think anyone expected an authentic Bengali experience when they watched ‘Jo Bichar Gaye’, so why expect Lahori culture to be on full display here?

  • @mpsingh9806
    @mpsingh9806 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    It was not indian flag...before partition congress flag was d same ...in the centre there was a spinning wheel called charkha .

    • @harshitachauhan6098
      @harshitachauhan6098 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      pre independence Congress ke baare me inko padhaya gya hota tab to kuch pta chlta inko 😂

  • @pa-hx4hl
    @pa-hx4hl 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    Firstly all slb’s work is hyper stylised. Series is set in 1920s-40 Lahore. There was no Pakistan. They fought for the freedom of india. Bhagat Singh was also from Lahore btw

    • @ritika14707
      @ritika14707 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Jinnah was popular in the Aligarh belt. Lahore ending up in Pakistan and Amritsar ending up in India was the result of a coin toss by the British. No one in those two places had any say so in the matter. Their admiration or lack thereof for Gandhi, Nehru or Jinnah had nothing to do with who they now supposed to revere.

    • @luzvez
      @luzvez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      There was no India as well.

    • @kanikaarora2316
      @kanikaarora2316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They don't know about Bhagat Singh. They call him terrorist.So, what are you trying to teach them? It's a waste of time.

    • @neenachandra7968
      @neenachandra7968 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@luzvez have you ever read or ever heard about a book .. called A Passage to India written by E.M Forster in 1924....the present Indian subcontinent was called India Always ...Ever heard about Colombus .? He wanted to find India ...but reached North America instead.. you cannot change history .. Indian subcontinent was always called India!!

    • @luzvez
      @luzvez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@neenachandra7968 it was called Indian SUBCONTINENT, not India. Now go argue with a wall.

  • @PfefferNusse-vr4yo
    @PfefferNusse-vr4yo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    What idiocy!! Heeramandi is not a documentary..........uffffffffff people who have not made even a pen are poking fingers at others.......ufffffffffffffff

    • @kanikaarora2316
      @kanikaarora2316 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So true 😂.

    • @mskiran36
      @mskiran36 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's a review. Hence their opinion.

    • @lootnloot
      @lootnloot 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      100% Realistc review….Pakistan is way ahead of in writing, directing, acting for TV series…. You are pissed because all you have is BIG BUDGET nothing else. Bollywood movies are full of crap.

    • @azkashaikh3148
      @azkashaikh3148 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@lootnlootohhh really???
      Why Pakistanis are obsessed with Indian movies ,Indian songs,Indian actors
      Pakistani industry should make one movie like this then you Pakistani dare to come and say shit ...
      You all have grown up watching Indian movies only ..you will watch and then criticize waah

    • @azkashaikh3148
      @azkashaikh3148 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      So true
      You don't have any movie who you can show proudly to the world yet dare to come and shit about Indian movies and talent
      You guys copies India in your dramas ,awards even shows pattern..

  • @horseridingwithme5168
    @horseridingwithme5168 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    I disagree with Amna. Manisha’s performance was outstanding

    • @ZahoorAhmad-2475
      @ZahoorAhmad-2475 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But imagine, if Madhuri or Rekha would be as Malikajaan.. How perfect they are in their craft.. We all expect some extra ordinary from SLB..

  • @MediaSnackpack
    @MediaSnackpack 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Thank you Aamna, for saying everything you said about the Tallafuz because I was really irritated because of the pronunciation of Kh and some Urdu words. Also, you're absolutely right about the Badshahi Masjid part.

    • @JustJuveeee
      @JustJuveeee 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Same way we also felt irritated with mahira khans tallafuz in raees.. Sajals in mom.. fawad khan in khoobsurat.. they came to India and still didn’t learn Indian lehza.. heeramandi was never meant to cater Pakistani audiences.. nor was it Pakistani film.. India’s lehza is very different. And they did fine with it.

    • @mxhsvn_b7866
      @mxhsvn_b7866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@JustJuveeee it's set in lahore so they should have worked on it. Both urdu and punjabi was weak

    • @JustJuveeee
      @JustJuveeee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mxhsvn_b7866 even if it's set in lahore it wasn't made for lahore it was made for Indian audience specifically... Same way fawad Khan khoobsurat was made for Indian audie and story was based of Rajasthan.. did he work on marwadi dialect.. come to India and hear out how madwadi speak.. fawad Khan's lehza was nothing but pakistani.. Same with Mahira Khan's raees.. story was based on ahemdabad region..did she learn gujrati dialect.. as a Gujarati Muslim myself her acting was worth of puking.... Before giving Vishesh tipni on Bollywood actors first take a look at lollywood actors.

  • @PakiPardesia
    @PakiPardesia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +61

    Hasan, this was before 1947. Minar Pakistan construction started in late 1950s.

    • @SomethingHaute
      @SomethingHaute  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      Ok yes I stand corrected
      - Hassan

    • @mehakshahrukh4115
      @mehakshahrukh4115 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Hi hassan Sanjey leela bhansali only wants to sell his series in the name of HEERMANDI !! Thats why he cannot make it as any fictional area ...

    • @mehakshahrukh4115
      @mehakshahrukh4115 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi hassan Sanjey leela bhansali only wants to sell his series in the name of HEERMANDI !! Thats why he cannot make it as any fictional area ...

  • @zannatulzannat6891
    @zannatulzannat6891 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +161

    So u guys r disappointed with their urdu,panjabi😂.the same thing happend with me while i watched jo bichar gaye .what a horrible bengali was spoken by wahaj ali.not even 1 word i was able to understand.they should hv simply go for their own language instead of speak in bengali.i was so pissed of his language that i had to stop watching

    • @geetanjalihossain2948
      @geetanjalihossain2948 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

      Massive respect to you for saying this out loud! Bengali language is such a meethi bhasha but was absolutely butchered in Jo Bichar Gaye and I dont know how some bengalis didnt have a problem with it.

    • @asgharigul9376
      @asgharigul9376 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      Agreed but here there are many other issues related to the depiction of streets, shops and many other things

    • @nasihanadeem6894
      @nasihanadeem6894 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

      Omg yesss finally someone said this! Throughout this review the only thing I kept on thinking was how Jo Bichar Gaye, which is apparently a critically acclaimed series had such bad bengali lol. Im a huge admirer of pak dramas but honestly here I would even give Alia’s broken one two words in Bangla in Rocky Rani more credit than team Jo Bichar Gayes lazy attempt of trying to show a bengali character. I dont
      Know who didnt have a problem with it but nearly everyone around me who mind you are heavy consumers of pak drama and even are wahaj ali fans, could not sit through even one episode of JBG sadly. Rumi being a bengali boy, fighting for freedom, couldnt even say ‘Joy Bangla’ correctly 😂

    • @zannatulzannat6891
      @zannatulzannat6891 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@nasihanadeem6894 yea here only this much pblm they made a big issues.i know wahaj as a actor he did good but the history of Bangladesh also missleaded& Bangladesh is the only country who fought for their language bangla .so it was so disappointment for me .but the same critics was so happy with jo bichar gaye they praised for his good try which is 100% failed.i would just suggest the other cast spoke in urdu in jo bichar gaye then why he need to speak in bengali where he 100% failed he could hv just simply go for urdu just like other cast even if u r fan of him i dont think any Bangali can watch it except his blind fan

    • @gerryburntwood9617
      @gerryburntwood9617 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Even though Wahaj was coached by bengalis for the drama according to the reels I’ve seen where he mentioned this and shows gratitude to his Bengali fans too who also assisted him in this regard!

  • @amitprabhu2069
    @amitprabhu2069 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Secondly.. I have watched this Heeramandi series and all actors have acted exceptionally, especially Manisha Koirala with her Mallikajan role. So, pls don't reveal your hatred here because we take Pakistanis and their intellect for granted and rightly so..

    • @AF-ho6nh
      @AF-ho6nh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So don’t watch Pakistani reviews then? Go find some Indian reviews to watch. There’s a thing called free speech and they are entitled to their own opinion.

  • @saz741
    @saz741 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +76

    Sorry to say completely disagree with Hassan .whats wrong with creative liberty ? And this is pre partition India so Hassan has no right to say they have any claim to Lahore etc

    • @talha9256
      @talha9256 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Hira mandi pre partition ma bhi itni hi Thi jitni abhi ha 4 5 gunnah bari karna ki Kya zarorat Thi 😂

  • @amirakhan898
    @amirakhan898 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

    Lol not Hassan saying "I don't mean to be disrespectful....", and "with all due respect.." and proceeding to trash it all! 😂 Love it!

  • @Lilimo61
    @Lilimo61 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    Guys if you both think this serial is so wanting please get one your directors to produce your own version and then let’s truly compare
    This is a Netflix serial not a film which is for the big frame
    I don’t think both of you are completely unbiased I am sorry respectfully

  • @fareehakashif3621
    @fareehakashif3621 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +29

    Poory review main urdu ki ghalatiyan nikaal kar end main Sanjeeda ka naam ghalat bol diya 😭😭 Typical pyaaray Hassan.

  • @alkabajaj5798
    @alkabajaj5798 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    It’s coming smell of jealousy… movies is always fiction why you people take seriously on heart .. it’s 1920 story that time no Pakistan…

    • @amibatth
      @amibatth 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree. They are behaving as if they owned heera mandi in those times. No they didn't!! It was part of hindustan. Hasan's review is political

    • @iman.k8316
      @iman.k8316 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      But this was in fiction. It was a story told about a real place in Lahore.

    • @AF-ho6nh
      @AF-ho6nh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol why would they jealous? You’re just so pressed Pakistanis didn’t like somehting made in India. So don’t watch Pakistani reviews then? Go find some Indian reviews to watch. There’s a thing called free speech and they are entitled to their own opinion.

  • @heythere7048
    @heythere7048 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    I agree with Aamna's Pov but hasan on other hand was doing a little gatekeeping he forgot it's fictional series...yes it was ok ...one time watch type but around half video Hasan complained as if it was documentary which it wasn't it is a pure fictional story like any other series .

    • @amibatth
      @amibatth 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yeah hasan was taking it personally as if somebody tarnished the image of heeramandi in lahore !!! Nobody knew what heeramandi is outside pakistan. Hasan is like ' how dare you 😂😂

  • @var.sri1710
    @var.sri1710 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +214

    Hi Hasan & Aamna- just a small correction. You mentioned multiple times during your review that the story is set in 40s but it was actually in the 20s. That’s why it was the Indian flag and no talk about Pakistan. In 20s the main focus was independence and not creation of 2 countries.

    • @fashionstationindia
      @fashionstationindia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

      Nope ..Quit India movement was mentioned and it was 1942..From Manisha youth to Alam it spans from 1920-45

    • @luzvez
      @luzvez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      It wasn't India. It was called the Subcontinent.

    • @SomethingHaute
      @SomethingHaute  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +146

      Series opens in 1920s when Manisha’s character gives birth to her son. By the time Manisha becomes Huzoor over 20 years have easily passed; we even see her son getting married who looks he’s in his mid 20s
      - Hassan

    • @var.sri1710
      @var.sri1710 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      @@luzvez pre 15th Aug 1947 current day India Pakistan and Bangladesh was one country called India not “subcontinent”. Subcontinent word is now used to to de mark a geographical area that is very similar culturally, geographically etc.

    • @luzvez
      @luzvez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@var.sri1710 still not India. there was no india or Pakistan or bangladesh. It was called Subcontinent.
      So according to your logic, India didn't exist as well. It's the story from Subcontinent Mughal era & Pakistan has deep roots to the history, language & culture of that era!

  • @ataurean20
    @ataurean20 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +87

    What would you say about Maula jatt? Which Punjab did it show? Love your content but sorry to say that this is sheer hypocrisy.

    • @faatimaah4225oj
      @faatimaah4225oj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +32

      Maula jatt was fiction, not attributed to a real place or people

    • @luzvez
      @luzvez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@faatimaah4225oj exactly! I don’t know why Indians get so butthurt claiming everything as theirs as if India existed back then.

    • @Sana-t5z5g
      @Sana-t5z5g 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@@faatimaah4225ojit was written that this also friction but they can make a little change atleast it look like I am watching sufi and weird urdu performance in all 8 episode. They should speak punjabi.

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@Sana-t5z5g why would they speak Punjabi?

    • @m.abdullahyousaf9863
      @m.abdullahyousaf9863 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      ​@@AdilAzharKhanBecause it's Lahore which is in Punjab I suppose

  • @zeniakhan1095
    @zeniakhan1095 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +71

    Hi Hassan and Aamna, really was looking forward to your review on heeramandi, really nice review but utterly disappointed by the lack of understanding in comments section..
    First and foremost, urdu WAS the language of majority of muslim population in sub-continent at that time, it was the language of nawabs. If they wanted to show a muslim majority area, the attention should have been given to it regardless of the era it depicts.
    Secondly, alot of indians saying that because it was pre independance, why mention Jinnah? Just wanted to ask….was Jinnah born after independance and had no role in the politics at that time? If you were to show Lahore and freedom fighters, then either skip all names or take all names? Why did they mention gandhi and nehru ay first place? Just avoid it… or if you were to take names then take Jinnah’s name too.
    Lastly, maula jatt is set in an imaginary place in punjab, heeramandi was/is not an imaginary place…

    • @anuvaid6457
      @anuvaid6457 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Agree. Specially being a big banner with mulit cast they could have sent people abroad or invite them to give feed back. Some director send crews or the actors to get the actual feeling of the place and culture. There can't be another Umrao Jaan than Rekha

    • @zeniakhan1095
      @zeniakhan1095 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@anuvaid6457 yes and i think the disappointment is more because it is SLB who is known for his attention to detail. If it was made by someone else i dont think people would have reacted this way!

    • @kkirti2
      @kkirti2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The reason nehru was mentioned in context of Tajdar who came from vilaayat, just like Nehru. SLB was definitely thinking about this from an artistic angle, not from a political one.
      Same reason for the Indian flag. There was no reason to mention Pakistan or Pakistani flag.
      Nonetheless, it was a one time good watch

    • @zeniakhan1095
      @zeniakhan1095 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@kkirti2 FYI Jinnah also came from vilaayat, and was a barrister just like Tajdar who was a lawyer, and Tajdar is shown to be a muslim so it would make way more sense to take Jinnah’s name instead of Nehru, but if SLB was truly thinking of artistic angle, all names could have been avoided and it could strictly remain artistic!
      Secondly, you are showing indian flag on 15th Aug in Lahore who became a part of Pakistan a day before on 14th Aug, does this make sense to you for real?!!!

    • @kkirti2
      @kkirti2 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @zeniakhan1095 agree with jinnah point. I didn't know his background. Seems like an oversight or probably wasn't mentioned as jinnah is not looked upon as a freedom fighter in India - SLB knows best what he was thinking.
      I don't think the flag was shown in the light of 15 Aug. The timeline was 1920s to 1940s but didn't not reach the point of independence in 1947.

  • @alkabajaj5798
    @alkabajaj5798 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    In maula jatt what rabbish punjabi spoken by mahira even she don’t speak Urdu properly …Manisha done superb job in it… actually Pakistani can’t tolerate heeramandi made by Indian great SLB … bcoz Lahore is part of Pakistan now … they people specially lollywood spreading negative propaganda of heeramandi …it’s a Pre planned

    • @nazish321
      @nazish321 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I follow all Indian reviews anmol jamwal quint lallantop film companion .even not a single Indian publication has praised this work of Sanjay Leela bhansali .I m big fan of devdas.abve all the series lack a good story ...

  • @Sunset_sunrise-h6c
    @Sunset_sunrise-h6c 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +73

    I agree about this criticism on heeramandi. As a Sikh from India Punjab with roots in Lahore, it was a massive let down and disappointment.

    • @diwanegautamanand1665
      @diwanegautamanand1665 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You were obviously born in Lahore ? Chill man

  • @TravelEatWithNasKhan
    @TravelEatWithNasKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    #6. Fun fact about #Heeramandi. Role of Servant “Saima” is based on famous Pakistani singer Noorjehan who goes to Calcutta and becomes a famous singer.

    • @suneetalva2997
      @suneetalva2997 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Was NJ also a servant at a Heeramandi kotha prior to her singing career?

    • @m.abdullahyousaf9863
      @m.abdullahyousaf9863 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ohh

    • @NasirRKhan-Wanderer
      @NasirRKhan-Wanderer 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@suneetalva2997Noor Jehan lived in Heera Mandi for few years before moving to Calcutta where she started her singing and acting career. Most of Pakistani film actresses until 2000, were from Heera Mandi.

  • @priyamverma5843
    @priyamverma5843 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Still the series is trending at No. 1 in India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Saudi Arabia, Oman and at No. 5 in the UK. There is something about the series which the audience wants to watch. Understand your frustrations but this is not a history class.

    • @MysticSage-hg3jh
      @MysticSage-hg3jh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      This is a Regressive Channel
      They think they become progressive by keeping a French Name for their Channel 😂

    • @mxhsvn_b7866
      @mxhsvn_b7866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      ​@@MysticSage-hg3jh how are they regressive by pointing out factual errors😂😂😂😂

    • @Devine-oi9vn
      @Devine-oi9vn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Hasan is just feeling possessive about Lahore forgetting that it was a part of pre partition India and many present day Indians have Lahori ancestry, hence have claim!! Bad taste review!

    • @lootnloot
      @lootnloot 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He and Amanda are 100% correct in their comments and critic. The producer need to see these Pakistani reviews and think fifty million times before he show any HISTRY movie….

    • @lootnloot
      @lootnloot 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      VERY REALISTIC REVIEW…

  • @nazneenzaidi1722
    @nazneenzaidi1722 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Completely agree with Hassan and Aamna, this was sadly a lost opportunity to make something more relevant and memorable other than just grand sets sadly, and they look like cold sets, the muhalla vibe is completely absent

  • @Hutchkabee
    @Hutchkabee 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I totally agree with your review. I was not able to complete the series. It seemed like a caricature and it really didn’t help that the acting performances were under par. Especially the Alam character uff.

  • @sikshaghimire6244
    @sikshaghimire6244 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    Make your own Heeramandi guys, stop complaining. Even your actors like Neelum Muneer has no expression. Heeramandi casts were phenomenal

    • @sakina2351
      @sakina2351 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      no need to do us vs them! also even though a lot of pakistani actors really do a terrible job 😂i really would not say the casting of heeramandi was good at all. two separate things

  • @AmanManzar-tj4jp
    @AmanManzar-tj4jp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Pakistan flag was designed on 11th August 1947 so just 3 days before, so doesn’t make sense to show Pakistan flag tbh.
    Further Indian flag was always known to represent the muslim by green colour so I think its fine if they didn’t use Pakistan flag in pre-independence considering film was about early 40s.

    • @riffataftab-t9k
      @riffataftab-t9k 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      do you forget the 1940 famous jalsa of lahore manto park where muslims passed a resolution for a seperate homeland and the park was not far from heeramandi , just 3 streets away .

    • @AmanManzar-tj4jp
      @AmanManzar-tj4jp 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@riffataftab-t9k how is that relevant to the flag?

    • @hinasiddiqui6011
      @hinasiddiqui6011 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because there the flag have been seen with chaand taara madam in 1940 jaalsa

  • @user-rand0m1234
    @user-rand0m1234 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I think SLB took inspiration from Pakeezah for the setting. Even in Pakeezah they show a smaller kotha in relatively narrow street in the beginning of the film. It's only when the ladies move out and get their own place, that they show the grandeur of a castle.

  • @deepaks3481
    @deepaks3481 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Guys, save your time and do watch the movie called 'Manjummel boyz'. It's mind blowing and is an emotional rollercoaster

  • @essaay90
    @essaay90 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Awesome ….on point review …. Hats off to u guys👏🏻

  • @cyberfan1
    @cyberfan1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Loved your interview. I have no taste for the over the top, glitzy SLB films. After your review, even that smidgen of an interest in watching it has totally evaporated. So thank you 🙏😊

  • @MAbd-pt8dv
    @MAbd-pt8dv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Contrary to popular opinion, I found Heeramandi to be a rather good watch!
    Among the performances, my favorites were by Sanjeeda Sheikh, followed by Manisha and Sonakshi, and then Aditi and Ustaad G (don't know the actor's name). However, the portrayal of Alamzeb by Sharmeen was the weakest and most disappointing. Considering the significance of the character, the subpar performance was a big letdown. Maybe if they had cast someone else, the show would've been much better.

  • @sadiqa602
    @sadiqa602 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +52

    Pls consider the fact that it was set in pre independence era there was no pakistan at that time so how come there will be a pakistani flag
    Pakistan came in existence after independence which is 1947

    • @SomethingHaute
      @SomethingHaute  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      Rewatch what I said
      - Hassan

    • @sabazeee5341
      @sabazeee5341 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Lekin qarardad 1940 ko manzoor ho gye thi..agar flags nhe the lekin pakistan ka nam to mojud tha to km az km pakistan ka nam le skte the..k pata chalta k azadi ki tehreek chal rhi thi

    • @nazlihussain1054
      @nazlihussain1054 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We no that but even before Lahore was not like this

  • @baazinews1027
    @baazinews1027 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Urdu's entire Grammar is based on Sanskrit/Hindi 😊
    Urdu is not a Language in Itself. Its a Combination of Other Languages or a Hybrid Language 😊
    85 % of Urdu is Hindi/Sanskrit 😊
    15 % of it is Turkish, Farsi and Arabic 😊

    • @khittaykachoudhary2360
      @khittaykachoudhary2360 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      I am from Pakistan and you are right bro ... But we also have some original Urdu words.
      But mostly it is just hindi language as you said. and some Turkic and Arabic and farsi words ...

    • @Health-Blitz
      @Health-Blitz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Hmm i agree

    • @mxhsvn_b7866
      @mxhsvn_b7866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      so? The actors still couldn't pronounce the words properly😂😂😂

    • @scorpionicbeing
      @scorpionicbeing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      If that is so then you are definitely a pro in reading and understanding pure Urdu as it is based on Hindi per you and Ameer Khusro, Ghalib, Meer, Akbar Allah Badi, and other poet's work should be really understandable for you. Urdu is mainly derived from Farsi and Arabic which is why Urdu uses Perso-Arabic script and it makes reading the Quran really easy JFYI. then it borrowed about 25% of words from Turkish, English, Sanskrit, Hindi, and some other languages. Hindi is derived from Sanskrit. Pure Urdu and Pure Hindi are damn different even in listening and hard to understand. However, Easy Urdu (Salees Urdu) does exist and that's what Bollywood uses in Devanagari scripts and promoting URDU in Hindi packaging. For example let's take these common words like Mohabbat, Ulfat, Ishq, and Pyar. Mohabbat is a Persian word, Ulfat and Ishq are Arabic words where as Pyar is a only Hindi word. Mohabbat, Ulfat, and Ishq are not Hindi at all but are included in Urdu. But since it is a STUPID Aim to politically confuse Urdu as Hindi it may be right for many people to recognize them as Hindi but actually, its Urdu that they are listening and learning and damaging real Hindi somehow. Hope it may help you in correcting your percentage.

    • @scorpionicbeing
      @scorpionicbeing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@khittaykachoudhary2360 if Bollywood uses Urdu in Devanagari scripts, it does not make it Hindi at all. Urdu does not have SOME Arabic and Farsi words but it is derived mainly from those two languages and blends other languages like Turkish, English, Hindi, Sanskrit, and others. If it has this many Hindi words then you should not be able to read the Quran easily or recognize Arabic words. Khotay khana sa first milay tu yeh patta hoga na!

  • @kaltesf
    @kaltesf 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I don't know if Aamina n Hasan @somethinghaute know but Aditi Rao hydari comes from a Royal family... hence that elegance and poise comes naturally.. but yeah agree the lack of expressions make everything fall flat!!!

  • @TravelEatWithNasKhan
    @TravelEatWithNasKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    #Heeramandi 2. No mention of historic places in Lahore such as Shahi mosque or Ravi river. Hera Mandi is next to Shahi mosque

  • @crazybites90
    @crazybites90 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I think it was good to be not shown as divided India, that would have caused additional controversies and was not needed to show one more side of rift other than the British. The movie purposes was not that. It was one india and hiramandi together in the end. I really loved hw revolutionary were both hindu muslim together. So though i like most of ur reviews, i hav a different pov here

  • @eshaguptahere
    @eshaguptahere 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    You people have been to Heeramandi in Lahore and that's why you didn't find it to authentic and thought it to be his weakest project..
    But the thing SLB has never been authentic , the movies of him that you gave example of in Bajirao Mastani so many Marathi lapses were there + shanivarvada was nothing like original shanivarvada same with Gangubai Kathiawadi , the Kamathipura set was way more grand and bigger than what actually kamathipura is..
    Nor the village in Devdas looked like a Bengali village..
    So SLB did what he does in his other projects also it's just that this time it was Lahore so you people noticed it..
    SLB has never been authentic to history , atmosphere etc. Just like Jodha Akbar he has been making firey love stories / Love triangles in grand sets..
    That's it.

    • @Bhumikaa78600
      @Bhumikaa78600 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly,,, they r pointing it out bcoz it's set in Lahore,, Moreover SLB never said that he is making a documentary... He made it for entertainment purpose and the story is set in Lahore pre partition era

  • @maryama1458
    @maryama1458 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Guys it doesn’t matter who makes it, what matters is who makes it GREAT.

  • @sophieglitter1717
    @sophieglitter1717 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Great review guys, you pretty much covered a lot of how I felt watching it. Glad it was only 8 episodes!

    • @TH-gj2hv
      @TH-gj2hv 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      💯

    • @zaara5956
      @zaara5956 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The characters lacked impression and I didn’t feel sad for any of the tragedies they showed!

  • @AtibMomin
    @AtibMomin 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    It's for indian audience by india director on pre partition india.We dont claim anything

    • @qurat-ul-ainsaghir7152
      @qurat-ul-ainsaghir7152 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So it shouldn't be on netflix.

    • @hinasiddiqui6011
      @hinasiddiqui6011 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So it shouldnot be about our area with Muslim majority even back then

    • @AtibMomin
      @AtibMomin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@hinasiddiqui6011 that was india and people that time were indiam

    • @Trackandshield
      @Trackandshield 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@hinasiddiqui6011it was not only your area. There was no seperation before. Anyone traveling from Lahore to Amritsar wouldn't have felt like they're traveling to some other country.

    • @VipinTolia
      @VipinTolia 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@qurat-ul-ainsaghir7152do u own Netflix? It's a global platform like TH-cam

  • @burhannaeem6181
    @burhannaeem6181 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +91

    heeramandi was far better than the dogshit we see on everyday tv. Hassan you should understand that HM is a fictitious and itni creative liberty banti hai. HM if not story but I feel it was performance driven, yes Alamzeb falls short but the rest from Sonakshi to Manisha to Sanjeeda i think they did a fantastic job. You guys were too hard in the review. Flaws hain but itnay nahi k the whole series was bad.

    • @abshaar13
      @abshaar13 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      They were hard on for all the right reasons. It's a Sanjay Leela Bansali movie for god sake! you don't expect such mistakes from him. A better research would have made this a great series, beyond the grand sets and a heavy starcast.

    • @shehzaadiammu2689
      @shehzaadiammu2689 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agreed 👍

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      This! They give seemingly glowing reviews to mediocre Geo and HUM series and nitpick one of the best productions from the subcontinent. I would even challenge HUM, Geo and others to step up and tell the story of Heera Mandi 'authentically' Lahori. We should applaud SLB for shining a light on a the story of the tawaifs and putting Heera Mandi on the mind of a global audience.

    • @sabafirdausi9214
      @sabafirdausi9214 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Ture but the point is HM isn’t fictitious at all but based on a place that existed. So to chalk it up as oh he did a good job but not meeting the background behind seems lazy l. Especially for a Director who put millions of dollars in the project and comparing it to small time dramas on TV is ridiculous. I actually thought the same things mentioned in this review having just visited lahore the whole set of the series was ridiculous. It seems like a Mahal more then a street

    • @ar.kaninikadeysarkar5104
      @ar.kaninikadeysarkar5104 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yesss!!!! So correct

  • @amibatth
    @amibatth 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

    Sad to see soo much hate sanjay leela bhansali is getting for making heeramandi based in lahore. Hasan is so bitter like many other pakistanis. Nobody knew about heera mandi befire this movie outside pakistan!!!
    SLB shouldnt have made this series!! Amnaa was little reasonable in her criticism but hasan is outrightly biased and bitter!! how dare sanjay made this seroes on lahore type of disliking from hasan !! Bichar gaye had a bad depiction of begali laguage. But that was okay with you guys !! I understand it is not one of the best series but you guys are behaving as if it was criminal to make this series. Ushna shah have a problem too.!! Very sad

    • @m.abdullahyousaf9863
      @m.abdullahyousaf9863 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Seriously

    • @talhariaz240
      @talhariaz240 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I agree, I am born and raised in walled city, Lahore and personally lived in old colonial era Haveli; this series is amazing and as I said in my separate comment, Hasan needs ' sensitivity training'. There is something called being sensitive in your criticism- you are making a livelihood by ridiculing a piece of art! I call you out Hasan on your insensitive criticism and you should apologize. Thanks.

    • @amibatth
      @amibatth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @talhariaz240 you are spot on. He is criticizing this series as if it was a documentary !! Hasan is very bitter

    • @nikitatiwari3616
      @nikitatiwari3616 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      +1... I am shocked with his comments!... especially his comment - "they made it political" ... as if all SLB does is to think what shld my next move be to piss of politicians and Hassan!

    • @2198pooja
      @2198pooja 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lol😂😂😂

  • @shivangisingh1560
    @shivangisingh1560 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I completely agree with you both they could have consultant and workshops for actors for the right pronounciation and of course better research team. Also I stopped watching Bhansali’s films long back as he now only focuses on sets, costumes , music etc. which overpowers the storytelling and direction in most of his recent projects. He should focus on storytelling and better research which he used to do in his initial projects.

  • @ozl54
    @ozl54 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very accurate interview, not biased at all, SLB cinematography was very dark, star cast obviously not the best
    Could have been A level. Loved your review.

  • @afraislam9147
    @afraislam9147 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Aamna is absolutely right had you reviewed only three or four episodes I wouldn’t have even watched it couldn’t care less either do it all or don’t do at all there’s no point in doing half assedly anything either go all in or don’t go at all

  • @Anony_mous5001
    @Anony_mous5001 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Pakistani here, I feel you're being a tad bit too negative, agree about Badshahi Masjid and Sharmin being expressionless also agree that Fawad Khan would have been perfect. I really like 2 or 3 of the songs. I don't know why this reminded me about Mangal Pandey. I really enjoyed this because I grew up watching movies like Pakeezah so this was in some ways nostalgic.

  • @PakistaniVibez
    @PakistaniVibez 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    Wish you spoke about Richa Chadha’s portrayal of Lajjo, she was the most memorable for me from the series, despite her extremely short screen time. That last dance and her expressions just reminded me of the legendary Meena Kumari from Pakeezah

  • @ParminderKaur-qs9oc
    @ParminderKaur-qs9oc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    But hassan i think if nawabs were visiting heeramandi , then i think those places would have been grand not to the extent what is shown in series but it would have been grand . And i do agree plot was ridiculous . What they did in the last was stupid . But i think hassan it was pre independence there was no pakistan , this partition thing started happening in the last years of independence .

  • @ambika234
    @ambika234 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Pakistanis your past history is related with India which was your mother country, yours is a peculiar situation since if you go back in history, you have to deal with India which you do not like. So, understand why the Pakistanis who are nothing but converted Hindus or born to Mughal/Hindus are feeling so much insecure over their history. Have you ever acknowledged the freedom fighters of India who worked hard for its freedom because of which Jinnah got his own country.

    • @mxhsvn_b7866
      @mxhsvn_b7866 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      we don't feel bad at all😂😂 we're just pointing out factual errors. When will Indians obsession with pakistan end

    • @azkashaikh3148
      @azkashaikh3148 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@mxhsvn_b7866ohhh lol
      Big joke of a century
      Whole world knows who is obsessed with whom 😂😂😂

  • @AG-zc2jt
    @AG-zc2jt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I sense a ton of jealousy. FYI there was no Pakistan in existence at that time. This is pre independence India. Indian directors are very capable of producing something so grand and exquisite at such a opulent scale. The actresses were gorgeous did a great job their Urdu was just fine. Please digest this

    • @Uzmaaleemkhannn
      @Uzmaaleemkhannn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      nah urdu war pretty bad

    • @Uzmaaleemkhannn
      @Uzmaaleemkhannn 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      *was

    • @sa8135
      @sa8135 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Learn to take constructive criticism, not sure why you're triggered , Urdu wasn't great

  • @nailas999
    @nailas999 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Also there's a scene where Manisha koiralas character says, her nawab ham Lahore ki tawaifon ko salam thokta hay... Salam thokna is a very Bombay type language. Considered ghair mohazib and ghair shaista in urdu speakers

  • @surinammo
    @surinammo 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    This is set in early forties, so the freedom struggle was still only about Azaadi not about Pakistan. Secondly it's the Congress flag in the last scenes not the flag of India. It was used extensively by all freedom fighters

    • @zeniakhan1095
      @zeniakhan1095 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      "Lahore resolution" was passed on 23rd March 1940, where Minar-e-Pakistan stands today, and the idea of separate country was presented and resolution was passed then, what are you talking about?!!

    • @divineflu34567
      @divineflu34567 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​​​@@zeniakhan1095it wasn't a prominent demand though creation of Pakistan there was already hindu rastra going on it didn't gain momentum that time.

  • @maheragilani6591
    @maheragilani6591 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Completely agree with Hassan and Amna. The drama was a huge disappointment. The most jarring part was calling the Azadi movement as "inqillab" 😑

  • @08ayushmaan
    @08ayushmaan 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think in the Kalank movie ,they showed realistic Hira mandi but in this it's pure glorification.

  • @Hetal28
    @Hetal28 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

    🔹This was Pakistani territory- Pakistanis should make and own their own cultural nuances and stories and show the world how it’s done. It was rightfully belonging to your country and your story to tell
    Hence I understand Hassan’s frustration. I can imagine if Pakistani making South Indian territory story it would definitely go wrong 😂
    So forgive SLB depiction of Lahore 🙏🏻
    Love from 🇮🇳

    • @mehakwaqas8340
      @mehakwaqas8340 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for understanding

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      This comment makes absolutely no sense

    • @shimmy332
      @shimmy332 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    • @mollyv4908
      @mollyv4908 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Illogical - according to your logic only Germans can make a movie about the World Wars, Hollywood should have no right to make any movie which is not about US, Harry Potter movies 4-5 were made by Cuaron, a Mexican director. Your comment is as uneducated as SLB is.

    • @MysticSage-hg3jh
      @MysticSage-hg3jh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Lahore is Indian Territory Brother
      You are Mistaken
      Muzlims are Just Guests for a Few More Years in Lahore

  • @narjis8uu7hadi6
    @narjis8uu7hadi6 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I loved watching it personally. I think the sets and the whole setup looks similar to what we have seen about the tawaifs in those days. I don’t know anything about Heeramandi unfortunately I’ve never been to Lahore. We didn’t hear a lot of punjabi though …

  • @chaturvedianay6210
    @chaturvedianay6210 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hi Hasan sir and Aamna ma'am , your reviews are really great, its difficult these days to find critics who is actually critically evaluating a show based on fact and not with the aim of pleasing people in power in the industry. Keep going 😊. I don't know the reasons, but the fact of matter is Bollywood is not making movies and shows based on reality. I feel South Indian industry is performing much better.

  • @tabyz
    @tabyz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Amna & Hassan plz plz start reviewing 'Akbari Asghari' in Haute Classic.. You guys will love it

  • @lalimachatterjee8890
    @lalimachatterjee8890 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hassan you're right. Though l am an lndian yet l must say that this film was overdone.
    One thing l need to say that Heeramandi is based on 1940s time which is why lndian flag was taken ahead as Pakistan didn't come into being at that time. May be for this.....

  • @ayazakbar7175
    @ayazakbar7175 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No doubt the series was relief to your eyes with each and every single frame and i had completely loved the series...🇮🇳❤

  • @amyragirl
    @amyragirl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The FOOD point is so true! I mean that point hit home! Even Lucknow boasts of a very alive food scence even today even though the tawaif culture is no more!! Hey guys please recommend some similar tv shows and also where we could watch them!!

  • @288amna
    @288amna 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Worst thing is the Daadi telling her pota to go to Heera Mandi!! That’s a very ma’ayub and miyaar se giri hoi baat. None of the respectable families did that. The idea that Mughal princes went to courtesans to learn aadaab is something different. Those were different women and only for Prince and the women of the house won’t talk about them so openly and didn’t encourage their own sons to go there. It was a dhaka chupa fact. Shareef women did not talk like that and wanted their sons to go for nath utarwai

    • @relex922
      @relex922 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya sb pata hona k liya insaan ka nawab hona jruri h ...

    • @Ursfrndlyneena
      @Ursfrndlyneena 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do not know history. Heeramandi used to be a cultural centre. It's like saying go to Hollywood to learn acting.

  • @famina71
    @famina71 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hassan, you spoke my heart reviewing Heeramandi. This is why I love something Haute.

  • @NatashaNajeeb-g6d
    @NatashaNajeeb-g6d 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In 2003,Geo tv aired a drama Umrao jan ada,screen play by Zehra nigah,directed by Raana sheikh,it should be aired again or uploaded on youtube by its producer.
    It was the most authentic dramatisation of the novel.

  • @umztrq6496
    @umztrq6496 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +51

    Guys you have been unnecessarily harsh, it was never supposed to be the actual depiction of Lahore ki Heeramandi. It was just an idea based on fantasy and fiction. For your kind information SLB doesnt make documentaries 😂. I think all the cast did a fairly good job except for Sharmeem Saigol and I never noticed any pronunciation mistakes may be they werent that bad to get my attention 🤔. It is a SLB production so dont think it will be close to reality. The only thing is that they shouldnt have brought the revolution thing in the story. It would have been better if they have continued the rivalry and revenge aspect and ended on it instead. Taha Shah as Tajdar was good too as you failed to mention him. Definitely a star in the making. At least this was better than the stupid Ishq Murshid which has no connection what so ever between the scenes and has ended on a stupid note 😂

    • @hasnainkhanhk5093
      @hasnainkhanhk5093 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      💯 agree ishq murshid was a total mess don't even know how people watch that crap till last and these people loved that slow illogical boring show like the team has paid them 😂🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @Kanzaidi
    @Kanzaidi 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    For color pallette why it was gray n misty dark bcuz it depicts the saddens darkness n grimness associated with heeramandi it has nothinv to do with Lahore n its weather .. Hassan zayda critical hogaye hain .. like amna said it was a good watch but not a great watch n its fine .. they tried its okay Story humari thee hum tou bana nhi sakhte ik mean censor board wont pass it but i am sure Qasim Ali mureed n Samrat khusat can tell a story like this but thats another debate .. accent obviously was a problem with most of the actors n punjabi shouldnt be there in the narrative bcuz people use to go to these ladies A bcuz of Urdu speaking n writing especially .. Lucknowi Urdu should be delivered by the cast members not even the workers

  • @tanzeelakhalil5248
    @tanzeelakhalil5248 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Ohhh bhai there were no phajjay k paye in pre-partition lahore 🙏

    • @m.abdullahyousaf9863
      @m.abdullahyousaf9863 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      May be ... May be not Because as of my knowledge they are toooo purany

  • @latikakassotia7299
    @latikakassotia7299 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best thing about SLB is that he knows how to empower his female characters. He beautifully shown the era of tawaifs. This is definitely a female centric film.

  • @TheMemi23
    @TheMemi23 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You missed out on Ustadji. Played by Indresh Malik, he was brilliant

  • @sanaabbas7877
    @sanaabbas7877 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Think Heeramandi is a delightful watch regardless of the talaffuz or hazy depiction of history.Manisha was spectacular and so the rest of the cast except that nepokid.Myself hailing from Lucknow,wrong Q n Ghain hurts my ears too but Ihave seen many Pak A listers mispronouncing Q /Kh.

  • @logical5521
    @logical5521 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was the most honest review ever.

  • @crazybites90
    @crazybites90 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This series shed a very positive light on women of heeramandi.

  • @fatimahabib483
    @fatimahabib483 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Hey! I didn’t mind the grand depiction of heeramandi since it was set in the 1920’s. The story on the other hand was next to nothing. It was a terrible watch hated it

  • @Atgether
    @Atgether 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You people need to understand, the movie depicting the 40s era of Lahore, India. Don't take it personal.

  • @malaika1912
    @malaika1912 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    I agree with amna its good ur reviewing 8 eps together

  • @sophass5641
    @sophass5641 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    good or bad Heeramandi ranks top 5 of the week of the glabally watched non English series on Netflix. it gained 4.5 million views within the first week. Whether people like it or criticize it , most still recommend others to watch it. Bhansali and Netflix have achieved their basic goals despite criticism

  • @positivelyhappymom3238
    @positivelyhappymom3238 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    Manisha was superb acting wise followed by Richa and Sonakshi.

  • @marvic76
    @marvic76 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I find it odd that everybody is making it historical incorrect . It’s not a historical movie. It is a show. He never said he is making a historically accurate show. He is making an experience. The thing is till now nobody bothered to make a movie on heeramandi. Now he makes it and everybody makes a noise.

  • @AF-ho6nh
    @AF-ho6nh 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Also Aamna and Hassan, the research on Islam in the series was very poor. When someone dies, on hearing the news, someone else says ‘La ilaha ilallah’ instead of ‘inna lillahi was inna illaihi rajioon’.
    If Muslim makers had got somehting wrong about the hindu religion while making a show, there would have been so much outcry.

  • @malikachugani1275
    @malikachugani1275 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Guys it was so beautifully done n visual treat n not to forget Richa chaddha ,loved everything about it

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The part where she sat in the bride's seat was heartbreaking.

  • @shilpisriv2013
    @shilpisriv2013 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Extremely biased review. Heera mandi is not flawless but immensely watchable. Except for Alamzeb who’s sub par, rest of the cast has performed well especially Manisha Koirala, Sonakshi, Farida Jalal, Taha Shah, Ustaad ji, Aditi Rao etc.
    The lavish sets, intricate costumes, grand picturisation of songs, brilliant confrontational scenes between the lead actors in every episode keep the narrative flowing. The ending fell short though and seemed contrived. But overall it’s a great one time watch and doesn’t deserve the condemnation and unfair dissection of its real and perceived flaws by @somethinghaute.
    Let go of prejudices and immerse yourself in SLB’s vision of that era to really connect with and enjoy this series.

    • @ataurean20
      @ataurean20 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Agree, the series has flaws but it's very well made and extremely watchable.. the way they are tearing it apart, is sad and unexpected of Something haute..

    • @AnshikaSrivastava-hd4bc
      @AnshikaSrivastava-hd4bc 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Mujhe to lagta hai inke andar gussa hai ki Pakistani actress aur actors ko kyu nhi liya....and aamna mentioned so many time ki Urdu acchi nhi hai and fawad Khan ko hona chahiye tha matlab kya bole inko kuch samajh me hi nhi aata hai 😅😅

    • @scorpionicbeing
      @scorpionicbeing 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Luchnow ka Brothal, wahan ki Prostitutes ko Lahore mai fit karo gay tou yahi suno gaay. No body entertains a Sabotaged history. If bhansali does not fit his Luchnow fantasy in Lahore, you may not heard a word from here.

  • @vaneetdhami1
    @vaneetdhami1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Height of jealousy, shows in Hassan’s tone. Heera Mandi's history goes back to the 17th Century. It was first called the 'Shahi Mohallah'. Then changed to a Heera Mandi and it was a part of India. It was there the same Heera Mandi when Maharaja Ranjit Singh was the king of Lahore. Maharaja Ranjit Singh was also smitten by the beauty of one dancer of Heera Mandi, named Moran Sarkar. He married to Moran Sarkar. Shortly after, he was summoned to Amritsar before the Akal Takht, and Akali Phula Singh denounced him in the open assembly for violating the social rules of the Khalsa. Phula Singh declared that Maharaja Ranjit Singh must be given one hundred lashes on his bare back. The story is back from there . Then came British after Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s death. The last empire of Lahore, Punjab was a Sikh, and kingdom was of Sikhs. Lahore was the city of Hindu -businessmen before partition
    The time period of story had no Pakistan that time. So why are all Pakistanis creating hoo ha on this series.
    The series has a great story and beautifully presented. It is running as in the top ten of Netflix in 44 countries.Bhai bolo apney producers aur directors ko ke Sanjay Leela Bhansali nahi theek series bana saka to aap bana lo aur lagyo Sanjay Leela Bhansali Jitna paisa. The series has beautiful real gold Jewellery worn by the main cast. So enjoy the beautiful sets, beautifully specially designed real jewelry by Shri Paramani Jewelers for the series. Jab Pakistan waley Heera Mandi banayenge tab compare karengey who made the best movie or the series. Till then chill and enjoy the series.

    • @amibatth
      @amibatth 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      You arevtelling them sikh history these people are least interested in. They don't even mention. Maharaja ranjit singh anywhere anymore. Why waste time dear

    • @vaneetdhami1
      @vaneetdhami1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@amibatth, because the whole of Pakistan is thinking the history of Lahore/ Heeramandi is only for Pakistanis. The history before 1947 belongs to India.

    • @azkashaikh3148
      @azkashaikh3148 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So true
      They are jealous people ..They should make a movie like this and then do comment
      They haven't made a single movie who can be enjoyed and watched interestingly yet they come and dare to talk shit ...
      SLB has made other big projects he doesn't need their reviews and opinion. They're just trying to show faults and lackness of Heeramandi
      ..They are reviewing Indian cinema at their platform ..They do know their worth and ours also..

  • @MohdShahid-d8o
    @MohdShahid-d8o 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The acting of Taha as Taajdaar is pretty awesome , his smile,eyes were saying everything , his acting makes their love story liveable.

  • @atul9734
    @atul9734 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Lahore became a part of Pakistan on 17th Aug 1947, after India got independence.

  • @zarghoonawajid5000
    @zarghoonawajid5000 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Hi Amna and Hassan . I have always enjoyed your reviews and understanding of certain topics however this by far has been the most dissappointing review I have seen since you two started and I am commenting for the first time because I am so let down.
    If you were to watch a show with the thought in mind what the director had earlier said about casting before watching the show then you should have not watched it but if you did plan to watch it - you gotta go in neutral. You can't expect all characters to be portrayed like what they have been portrayed in the past like Umrao-jaan etc. I wonder you guys complain all the time of how there is nothing new , they keep repeating same thing yet when they do try something new - even then it is criticized. Even all courtesans/tawaifs didn't have the same attitude, personalities etc.
    Now if you have watched the show : it is mainly made on the concept : Heera Mandi (now- red light district) which was once the famed Shahi Mohalla that was dazzling with culture, courtship and the music and dance, this is where the courtesans lived. Women with financial and social autonomy, who were adept at and respected for classical music, dance, literature, politics etc - They were powerful as hell . Later when British came - it became more of a sex worker type of thing.
    I am surprised you think a GIGANTIC DIRECTOR like SLB would be so careless esp if he has been preparing for 20 years.Yes there are flaws and it did get slow in between . There could be improvements for sure but overall it was absolute paisa wasool. A good show is that does not leave you for sometime once you are done with it, leaves an impact and this show definitely does that to you.
    Acting wise : please don't bring comparisons. Manisha koraila owned it : her performance was fabulous. Sonakshi since also did her part 100%. Could not imagine anyone else doing her role. Aditi, sangheeta, Tajdar , satto, bhatto, Lajjo, saima , iqbal, ustad ji , Cartwright - they were all amazing in their roles. About Alamzeb : I am not sure - I did see the innocence/stupidity in her eyes and purity though her act , but yeah maybe more emotions and all could have helped. A man (SLB)who has access to any actor in the world maybe could have done better. But please if anyone says that they could have used a prettier Alamzeb than that is horrible. I see all commenting about body, color shaming etc etc but when it comes to this - people forget.

    • @sujatabharti451
      @sujatabharti451 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A genuine review

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I don't blame them for having a negative opinion, because it's their opinion and they have the right to say what they want. But I'm just really disappointed in their explanation, their general attitude towards SLB and the cast, but also having contradictory opinions that make little sense.

    • @MysticSage-hg3jh
      @MysticSage-hg3jh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Sunni Punjaabi Pakistani Men Don't Like Strong Independent Decision Making Women 😊
      Because it Makes Sunni Punjabi Pakistani Men Insecure 😊

    • @AdilAzharKhan
      @AdilAzharKhan 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@MysticSage-hg3jh this is not true at all and quite frankly pretty insulting. Please don’t politicise this discussion. This has nothing to do with ethnicity, nationality, religion etc.

    • @khittaykachoudhary2360
      @khittaykachoudhary2360 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MysticSage-hg3jh Unfortunately you are right. but please dont say it like this openly
      please deletee your comment

  • @injlakhan9663
    @injlakhan9663 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This took SLB 18-20 years to make herramandi and nobody ever corrected him that ت and ط are two diff hurf 😏

  • @monzime
    @monzime 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Started watching it with too much anticipation, but it kept falling short on everything. I binged watched it and felt let down especially the storyline. Despite, the short comings enjoyed Sonakshi Sinha & Aditi Rao Hyderi & the legend FARIDA JALAL.
    Sanjay Leela Bhansali seems to have made this in a hurry. He's a meastro. I still remember the carving & design on the columns in Devdas, the dances, the music, the acting was great. So when as a viewer we talk about the shortcomings it's not as we have anything against the maker but just that you expect higher quality of execution.

  • @MysticSage-hg3jh
    @MysticSage-hg3jh 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Lahore is Heeramandi 😊
    And Heeramandi is Lahore 😊