Have you tested Mullvad's browser yet? What was your experience like? Leave it below!⬇ *➡Our content is completely free to the world thanks to our Patreon supporters, consider becoming one to help us spread privacy to the masses:* patreon.com/techlore The New Oil covered some other details as well for those interested: th-cam.com/video/MW4YUkrsa2g/w-d-xo.html
I can't use this since it doesn't have a package for FreeBSD. Also at first glance the source is strange. The source is in a sub-branch and not in main. I don't like the way they do their versioning. Is this beta software or is it production ready. You can't tell by the version info. IMHO the project needs time to mature and to see if it really can displace Mozilla or Chrome. I hate to be critical about it but for now it's just another fork that I can't try. They do have a Firefox plugin I may try but if the plugin does what the browser does then why get the browser?
No way. Mullvad was the one and only VPN I've ever paid for and it was reliably blazing fast each time. I only needed it for a week at most and that one-month payment system has been perfect for me since I do not need it yearly.
I need the functionality that the firefox browser has and the ease of access to that functionality....That's why I use it. No other browser has that functionality presented in the same way and that is what makes it easy and convenient to use. It allows me to organize in a very easy way, all my work.
I'm pretty sure that Mullvad VPN would respond to a court order should Sweden subpoena them. I read some of Sweden's privacy laws. One of the reasons I stay away from them.
Duckduckgo vs Firefox Focus. I can’t use Firefox Focus because it doesn’t have tabs on iOS/iPadOS. I don’t understand why. Think it had tabs the last time I used Android
8:35 - Is there any risk that if you install a degoogled chromium-based browser it is somehow can be turned into a data-collecting program by Google? Sorry if the question is silly
No, the google spying was taken out, so how could it do that, remember that google will still track what you do on their websites, no browser can stop that
Contributing to browser engine monoculture is an ethical argument worth having, but there's probably not a privacy issue. Anonymity might be compromised though as most users of Chromium browser are expected to phone home.
That only makes sense if you believe more fragmentation leads to a wider adoption, and I doubt that. Firefox based browsers need to become better and more convenient for the average user, not more plentiful.
@@duckmeat4674 the only reason why its not more "convenient" to the average person is because it doesn’t integrate Google services into it like Google Chrome does. same can be said for literally every other browser, especially the privacy-focused ones. the only way to remove the chromium monopoly is to somehow convince everyone that privacy is important and Google is not their friend. as soon as Google Chrome isn't by far the majority browser used, other browsers will begin to have a chance, including other chromium-based and other different browser engines like Gecko. of course there will still be Microsoft Edge and Safari, the first of which is also based on chromium. the only reason why those browsers are so popular is because they’re the default on their respective operating systems, and we all know most people don’t bother to change their defaults
@@chlorophyllphile the problem is chromium is actually calling most of the feature shots, and most websites tend to cater themselves to chromium over firefox, making it problematic for firefox to actually be convenient and have all the necessary compatibility. However, it still functions well despite these problems in my personal experience.
From all the videos I watch of this guy.....you can always tell that him and his team do extensive research while also not just 'telling' us about security news and privacy etc....they display FACTS from the sources..oh and they also say just don't take thier word for it, go research it yourselves...Def in my top 3 security channel list on YT, if not the top...really appreciate the work you guys.
I would think Tor exit nodes would mostly be either an alphabet agency by now, and/or a there are some 0-days they keep in the toolbox. I'm pretty sure a VPN in a case like this is just good for general tracking and protection rather than targeted, IE, if someone wants you they just can't hop on your wifi or use a poorly crafted malicious URL etc. Which VPN wouldn't really store identifiable user data
Didn’t know this existed. I’ll start moving from my hardened LW to MB after hearing that AF is going to eventually become deprecated in the future. Maybe run both of them until I work out any issues I may encounter on MB. 👍
While Mullvad Browser provides the same *anti-fingerprinting functionality* as Arkenfox, AF will not eventually become deprecated in the future, unless MB addresses a lot of *usability* issues that AF already does, which will at the very least take a while, and may never happen. github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/commit/b2b547ecb7250ce9262b45f5fd724e22e16b6d29#r107699803 Running both is an excellent solution though.
"Do we really need another browser?" Absolutely! There currently is (in the public eye, ignoring niche browsers) only Firefox and Chromium (derivatives are derivatives, not entirely new browsers), and Firefox is controlled by Chrome through funding.
I'd like to see more browsers on mobile. Firefox on Android is terrible, it's like a completely different browser than the desktop version I know and love.
Not sure of any potential negative implications in doing so, but it would have been cool to be able to save a profile account file locally in a personal cloud storage folder, in order to sync all of one's devices.
I use Brave, but I prefer to firejail a light browser in Linux versus Tor, which is slow and actually stands out on network traffic. VPN is not necessarily secure and also identifiable. VPN is basically a remote connection, but hackers have proved it to be a broken condom. I take a passive defense posture, versus tunneling which slows down. It depends on what you are doing, but Tor traffic across the Atlantic is watched by a long haul company out of Maryland. Anonymity from the watchers? Not really.
Your call, personally I'd go for Mullvad given it gets automatic updates across the board and I trust Mullvad to continue to push the envelope - especially since the Tor Project is officially involved. The GitHub thread in the description outlines the pros/cons of LW vs MV very thoroughly so you can come to a conclusion on what works best for you.
Your videos all always so well-researched and presented .. I don't know why your sub count (205K at the moment for my friends in the future) isn't at _least_ quadruple what it is right now .. but I hope the TH-cam algorithm turns its all-powerful eye towards you soon, because this channel deserves it for the hard work put in to deliver such consistently good and timely content.
I'm curious on one thing. Couldn't opening yourself to another fork project make security worse since you gotta wait for the fork to implement the updates of the base project. Like I used to use LibreWolf but besides the out of the box experience does it add anything that a hardened Firefox can't do? Maybe this is just another situation where you gotta compare the security and privacy potentials separately and come to a conclusion. Also with what I brought up with LibreWolf could that also apply to using Brave or Ungoogled Chromium over hardening Chrome? even if I don't like using chrome
I don't know about the rest of you but I've recently run into a problem with Tor Browser where it has become useless for me. On many websites all of a sudden I get this screen saying "we are checking your browser" or something to that effect whenever I use Tor, and it gets stuck on a never ending loop where it keeps doing this and never finishes no matter what I do. Even changing the security level of Tor to standard does not fix the problem. So now Tor Browser has become useless for me on many sites. Maybe Mullvad browser will work better. I'll have to test it out.
I downloaded and tried to install. The app opened to the first page, for a few seconds, then shut down. It will not open up. Each time it opens for a few seconds, then closes. Very odd. Anybody having this problem?
My current default browser is Brave. I also have Librewolf. That being the case, is there any reason why I would want Mullvad, other than to simply have another privacy oriented browser?
What do you guys use for YubiKey/CTAP2 w PIN on Linux? Or at least one besides Chromium?? 😩 Enabling it on FF based browsers doesn’t work because of lack of PIN support.
i tried downloading mullvad 3hrs will take to download the installer, i cancel too long my location is philippines. is mullvad good here in asia country?
I never understood why browsers tabs always were at the top with no way to put it vertical at the side without 3rd party addon. Once you have more than a few tabs it makes it so much trouble to identify quickly.
It's getting kinda annoying how you advocate for people taking their own privacy journey, yet constantly make back-handed insults about Firefox. Just say you don't like it and advocate using something else rather than trying to act unbiased while making it seem like everyone is an idiot for using a browser.
@@techlore 7:19 here's the back-handed comment. I just don't understand why you advocate people finding their own privacy route, while acting like people are dumb for wanting to choose Firefox. I agree that it has flaws and can be criticized, but if it's what works for people then it's what works. In your Windows hardening video you talked about why people might have reasons to want to use Windows over Linux, even if it's less private. Same argument could be made with Firefox. It really just seems like you have some personal dislike for Firefox and aren't willing to just say it. Which is fine, it's totally okay to advocate for something like Brave or Mullvad over Firefox. it just comes off as disingenuous when you create an online presence which is about helping people find what's best for themselves, then shit on some of the options. Also, what does -H mean? Genuinely not sure on that one.
Even when not in private mode, I log into each account every time I open my browser anyway. Never have I ever used "Save passwords" in a browser, used bookmarks, used a contacts list for email, hit a notification bell, used 2FA or signed up to any social media with my name.
you can. open the desired search page, right click the address bar where its url is and then click "add ... as search engine" or smth like it in the context menu, and then you can manage it in the browser settings
Librewolf doesn’t come pre hardened to the extent MB is. You’ll need Arkenfox, but the average Joe isn’t going through the trouble to running scripts. This isn’t for people that already have a hardened librewolf install they’re happy with.
@@thedinotamergaming There's some changes made in LW to harden it, but it doesn't use arkenfox as there's no user js in the profile directory or any of the scripts like prefs cleaner, so it literally _isn't_ . To have it bundled in would hurt usability for the average person who just wants their websites to work without any breaking, like in Chrome, as AF by default can break some websites like some banking sites (iirc it's from cross origin referrers being blocked by default in stock AF). If I am wrong then please enlighten me. I sent this comment from an AF hardened LW btw.
@@miavelvetThey're shady, anything that brags about their E2E encrypted email that is only E2E encrypted under certain circumstances raises a few red flags.
its with mullvad vpn so its like a tor but tor is really slow compared to vpn so it can be a ditch from your main browser (I’m using brave but lets see what it will do)
There's no way I'm using a browser that requires me to do MFA on every single site I use regularly, every time I close it. That's such a huge hassle. It's ridiculous that you can't use a cookie whitelist.
Have you tested Mullvad's browser yet? What was your experience like? Leave it below!⬇
*➡Our content is completely free to the world thanks to our Patreon supporters, consider becoming one to help us spread privacy to the masses:* patreon.com/techlore
The New Oil covered some other details as well for those interested: th-cam.com/video/MW4YUkrsa2g/w-d-xo.html
I can't use this since it doesn't have a package for FreeBSD. Also at first glance the source is strange. The source is in a sub-branch and not in main. I don't like the way they do their versioning. Is this beta software or is it production ready. You can't tell by the version info. IMHO the project needs time to mature and to see if it really can displace Mozilla or Chrome. I hate to be critical about it but for now it's just another fork that I can't try. They do have a Firefox plugin I may try but if the plugin does what the browser does then why get the browser?
first i heard about it from you. thx for the great news :D
We need a comparison video between Mullvad Browser and Librewolf!
That was my first thought
Yes Mullvad Vs LibreWolf Vs Brave
Bro you just read my mind
I certainly was wondering how the two compared, as LW is what I use for some of my personal browsing.
@@munadutta Vs Vivaldi.
No way. Mullvad was the one and only VPN I've ever paid for and it was reliably blazing fast each time. I only needed it for a week at most and that one-month payment system has been perfect for me since I do not need it yearly.
Thanks for mentioning the browser. I can trust it
I need the functionality that the firefox browser has and the ease of access to that functionality....That's why I use it. No other browser has that functionality presented in the same way and that is what makes it easy and convenient to use. It allows me to organize in a very easy way, all my work.
Yup. Here too.
i would love to see a comparison with librewolf
to prevent re-logon for every browser launch, disable settings/private browsing mode
"do we really need more"
need more browsers not just reskins of existing browsers
Great information.
I'm pretty sure that Mullvad VPN would respond to a court order should Sweden subpoena them. I read some of Sweden's privacy laws. One of the reasons I stay away from them.
That you stay away from Sweden, or Mullvad VPN? Sorry, I fell on my head as a kid and get easily confused.
@@THE-X-Force Mullvad VPN
Yes, but it they don't have the data, they can't share the data, right? If we assume they're honoring what they're saying, it should be ok.
So? Point of mullvad is that it reatains minimal data. Every business must adhere to law so this is just redundant point.
Thought it was Swiss based. I switched to ivpn a couple months ago from mullvad. I rarely VPN. On unknown wifi. Torrenting
Look so interesting
no extensions available ?
Tried yeasterday and the page on youtube got broken, so to speak, a grey color on the last third of the page.
Duckduckgo vs Firefox Focus. I can’t use Firefox Focus because it doesn’t have tabs on iOS/iPadOS. I don’t understand why. Think it had tabs the last time I used Android
Dont use any browser unless you know your safe I wouldn't trust anything i cant see the code to
Algorithm.
👏🏾💯
Is this browser a fork of FireFox?
Mobile mullvad apps time pls
8:35 - Is there any risk that if you install a degoogled chromium-based browser it is somehow can be turned into a data-collecting program by Google? Sorry if the question is silly
No, the google spying was taken out, so how could it do that, remember that google will still track what you do on their websites, no browser can stop that
Contributing to browser engine monoculture is an ethical argument worth having, but there's probably not a privacy issue. Anonymity might be compromised though as most users of Chromium browser are expected to phone home.
VPN company 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I hope to see more browsers based on firefox, to stop chromium monopoly.
That only makes sense if you believe more fragmentation leads to a wider adoption, and I doubt that. Firefox based browsers need to become better and more convenient for the average user, not more plentiful.
@@chlorophyllphile it already works fine, without issue, and more convinent? It takes just as much effort to install it
@@duckmeat4674 the only reason why its not more "convenient" to the average person is because it doesn’t integrate Google services into it like Google Chrome does. same can be said for literally every other browser, especially the privacy-focused ones. the only way to remove the chromium monopoly is to somehow convince everyone that privacy is important and Google is not their friend. as soon as Google Chrome isn't by far the majority browser used, other browsers will begin to have a chance, including other chromium-based and other different browser engines like Gecko. of course there will still be Microsoft Edge and Safari, the first of which is also based on chromium. the only reason why those browsers are so popular is because they’re the default on their respective operating systems, and we all know most people don’t bother to change their defaults
@@chlorophyllphile the problem is chromium is actually calling most of the feature shots, and most websites tend to cater themselves to chromium over firefox, making it problematic for firefox to actually be convenient and have all the necessary compatibility. However, it still functions well despite these problems in my personal experience.
DUDE!
From all the videos I watch of this guy.....you can always tell that him and his team do extensive research while also not just 'telling' us about security news and privacy etc....they display FACTS from the sources..oh and they also say just don't take thier word for it, go research it yourselves...Def in my top 3 security channel list on YT, if not the top...really appreciate the work you guys.
Aw thanks for the kind words
I use LW as my main, for the same reason as you're using Brave. I just prefer Firefox based browsers.
Friendly reminder mullvad was recently raided for user data and 0 bytes of data was available for the taking
Because their servers weren't in Sweden. They were in India I believe and Mulvad doesn't store anything.
I would think Tor exit nodes would mostly be either an alphabet agency by now, and/or a there are some 0-days they keep in the toolbox. I'm pretty sure a VPN in a case like this is just good for general tracking and protection rather than targeted, IE, if someone wants you they just can't hop on your wifi or use a poorly crafted malicious URL etc. Which VPN wouldn't really store identifiable user data
good posting
Hmm. Tor browser without Tor network. Fingerprinting reduction is nice. But where exactly does Mullvad come in?
Love all your guys work and research. One of my favorites!
Didn’t know this existed. I’ll start moving from my hardened LW to MB after hearing that AF is going to eventually become deprecated in the future. Maybe run both of them until I work out any issues I may encounter on MB. 👍
While Mullvad Browser provides the same *anti-fingerprinting functionality* as Arkenfox, AF will not eventually become deprecated in the future, unless MB addresses a lot of *usability* issues that AF already does, which will at the very least take a while, and may never happen. github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/commit/b2b547ecb7250ce9262b45f5fd724e22e16b6d29#r107699803
Running both is an excellent solution though.
"Do we really need another browser?" Absolutely! There currently is (in the public eye, ignoring niche browsers) only Firefox and Chromium (derivatives are derivatives, not entirely new browsers), and Firefox is controlled by Chrome through funding.
Mullvad is Firefox based
I'd like to see more browsers on mobile. Firefox on Android is terrible, it's like a completely different browser than the desktop version I know and love.
Not sure of any potential negative implications in doing so, but it would have been cool to be able to save a profile account file locally in a personal cloud storage folder, in order to sync all of one's devices.
Mullvad Browser runs in permanent private browsing mode, so there would be nothing to sync.
I use Brave, but I prefer to firejail a light browser in Linux versus Tor, which is slow and actually stands out on network traffic. VPN is not necessarily secure and also identifiable. VPN is basically a remote connection, but hackers have proved it to be a broken condom. I take a passive defense posture, versus tunneling which slows down. It depends on what you are doing, but Tor traffic across the Atlantic is watched by a long haul company out of Maryland. Anonymity from the watchers? Not really.
good post
I wonder if Proton will ever release a browser 🤔
after this, they def will
Of course it does.
Which one to use between Librewolf and Mullvad?
Your call, personally I'd go for Mullvad given it gets automatic updates across the board and I trust Mullvad to continue to push the envelope - especially since the Tor Project is officially involved. The GitHub thread in the description outlines the pros/cons of LW vs MV very thoroughly so you can come to a conclusion on what works best for you.
This is cool but this just seems to be firefox with an extension and some tweaked settings. I'll keep firefox for now
Your videos all always so well-researched and presented .. I don't know why your sub count (205K at the moment for my friends in the future) isn't at _least_ quadruple what it is right now .. but I hope the TH-cam algorithm turns its all-powerful eye towards you soon, because this channel deserves it for the hard work put in to deliver such consistently good and timely content.
Algorithm dude. Algorithm.
I don't see a need to use mullvad browser over something like brave or just using the private mode built into every browser.
This browser is really cool. I am excited to see how other privacy-focused browsers respond to this
I'm curious on one thing. Couldn't opening yourself to another fork project make security worse since you gotta wait for the fork to implement the updates of the base project. Like I used to use LibreWolf but besides the out of the box experience does it add anything that a hardened Firefox can't do? Maybe this is just another situation where you gotta compare the security and privacy potentials separately and come to a conclusion.
Also with what I brought up with LibreWolf could that also apply to using Brave or Ungoogled Chromium over hardening Chrome? even if I don't like using chrome
the only drawback is that I can't change it to Spanish.
I don't know about the rest of you but I've recently run into a problem with Tor Browser where it has become useless for me. On many websites all of a sudden I get this screen saying "we are checking your browser" or something to that effect whenever I use Tor, and it gets stuck on a never ending loop where it keeps doing this and never finishes no matter what I do. Even changing the security level of Tor to standard does not fix the problem. So now Tor Browser has become useless for me on many sites. Maybe Mullvad browser will work better. I'll have to test it out.
❤ this video mr Henry hope the mullvad browser does succeed
I downloaded and tried to install. The app opened to the first page, for a few seconds, then shut down. It will not open up. Each time it opens for a few seconds, then closes. Very odd. Anybody having this problem?
great news, great points!
have you reviewed the network chuck disposable cloud browser?
You guys are awesome😊
My current default browser is Brave. I also have Librewolf. That being the case, is there any reason why I would want Mullvad, other than to simply have another privacy oriented browser?
Hope you’re having a good weekend. ❤.
How is everyone doing
Fantastic
I see that you still use Tor. Does that mean that Tor has not been cracked yet? But there are still 3 letter agencies that monitor it? Thanks.
The nsa?
Librewolf does the same. Opens for a few seconds, then closes.
Please compare LW against Mullvad and Brave please
Librewolf
?
Brave is spyware
Is it better than brave for privacy?
Yes brave is spyware
How can I easily go about erasing my data print if I don't remember passwords I had when I was younger?
How is this compared to Libre wolf?
Why do these companies keep pushing browser extensions? If you are using a VPN you have to run your entire traffic through it.
What do you guys use for YubiKey/CTAP2 w PIN on Linux? Or at least one besides Chromium?? 😩
Enabling it on FF based browsers doesn’t work because of lack of PIN support.
We need a TunnelBear VPN browser 😤😤
Can you use streaming services (Max, Peacock, Netflix etc) with it? I love Librewolf but have to use something else to stream shows
When for android?
i tried downloading mullvad 3hrs will take to download the installer, i cancel too long my location is philippines. is mullvad good here in asia country?
Thanks for another great video! Will be testing it for sure!!
Mullvad VPN is working until Win 10 makes an Update. Then I can't get into the internet anymore. I have to install Win 10 again. Don't know why. ☹
I keep getting the error "Your MullvadBrowser profile cannot be loaded. It may be missing or inaccessible.". Anyone know how to fix it ?
Hahaaaaa yes I'm clinging to hardened Firefox for the next decade. Still has the best UI.
Search to find how can I use Mullvad Browser with a VPN which is not Mullvad Vpn???
First 👍
one big drag, can't be set as default on Windows.
👍
2:07 can you explain the fingerprinting problem here?
Just another zoomer who believes everything he read on the interweb.
no verticle tab = no dice.
I never understood why browsers tabs always were at the top with no way to put it vertical at the side without 3rd party addon. Once you have more than a few tabs it makes it so much trouble to identify quickly.
how does it compare to librefox though?
Sorry, I need my browser to lay flat.
Hello Henry, how's oswald?
It's getting kinda annoying how you advocate for people taking their own privacy journey, yet constantly make back-handed insults about Firefox.
Just say you don't like it and advocate using something else rather than trying to act unbiased while making it seem like everyone is an idiot for using a browser.
There are plenty of legitimate reasons to criticize Mozilla Corp. and what they've done to Firefox.
@@ErebosGR Agreed, but that doesn't really change what I've said.
This is a Firefox-based browser? Where were the back-handed insults? Stock Firefox has several limitation that forks of it like this address. -H
@@techlore 7:19 here's the back-handed comment. I just don't understand why you advocate people finding their own privacy route, while acting like people are dumb for wanting to choose Firefox. I agree that it has flaws and can be criticized, but if it's what works for people then it's what works. In your Windows hardening video you talked about why people might have reasons to want to use Windows over Linux, even if it's less private. Same argument could be made with Firefox. It really just seems like you have some personal dislike for Firefox and aren't willing to just say it. Which is fine, it's totally okay to advocate for something like Brave or Mullvad over Firefox. it just comes off as disingenuous when you create an online presence which is about helping people find what's best for themselves, then shit on some of the options.
Also, what does -H mean? Genuinely not sure on that one.
@@DaRootBeer1231 he’s saying default Firefox is bad not Firefox itself. Hardened Firefox is just as good as this new Mullvad browser or Brave
Sounds nice and all, but as long as its not completly free, I wont use it.
Hm but it is. -H
Wow
mulva browser
Does it support a Metamask extension or Rabby wallet extension?
Probably does it’s just a Firefox fork with added protections
Even when not in private mode, I log into each account every time I open my browser anyway. Never have I ever used "Save passwords" in a browser, used bookmarks, used a contacts list for email, hit a notification bell, used 2FA or signed up to any social media with my name.
So, Mullvad is sponsoring you next Tesla, as one shady VPN provider that you were praising years ago once did. Nice, nice.
9:27 good question, I want to know
dispatch.techlore.tech/i/113925716/questions-i-still-have
Some of the questions were answered here in the corresponding blog post
Assuming that feature matrix is accurate, why wouldn't you just use Brave?
its based on chrome
Because of bloat and/or ideological differences. Otherwise, it's one of the most solid browsers.
Personal preference, feature differences, etc. You're allowed to like & use multiple browsers. I still use Brave as well. -H
Nostr content ?
I can't add new search engines?
You can
you can. open the desired search page, right click the address bar where its url is and then click "add ... as search engine" or smth like it in the context menu, and then you can manage it in the browser settings
@@ВалерийШадрин-л5г Thank you very much. I've changed mine with your help :)
@@IdkG7 THere's no option
Wow. Brave browser checked all the fields.
No? There are more fields in the page.
But if you leave your fingerprints all around, maybe you get reincarnated as an AI model?
Librewolf makes these browsers redundant and unnecessary. I don't see why use this instead of librewolf.
Librewolf doesn’t come pre hardened to the extent MB is. You’ll need Arkenfox, but the average Joe isn’t going through the trouble to running scripts. This isn’t for people that already have a hardened librewolf install they’re happy with.
@@perpetualcollapse Librewolf is litteraly a fork of Firefox with arkenfox pre-installed
@@thedinotamergaming
There's some changes made in LW to harden it, but it doesn't use arkenfox as there's no user js in the profile directory or any of the scripts like prefs cleaner, so it literally _isn't_ . To have it bundled in would hurt usability for the average person who just wants their websites to work without any breaking, like in Chrome, as AF by default can break some websites like some banking sites (iirc it's from cross origin referrers being blocked by default in stock AF). If I am wrong then please enlighten me. I sent this comment from an AF hardened LW btw.
I’d love to see Proton VPN create a browser similar to this.
You can use this browser with any VPN 👍
Avoid proton at all cost
@@evilleader1991 why
@@miavelvetThey're shady, anything that brags about their E2E encrypted email that is only E2E encrypted under certain circumstances raises a few red flags.
Its just repainted Firefox...? With some settings set by-default?
its with mullvad vpn so its like a tor but tor is really slow compared to vpn so it can be a ditch from your main browser (I’m using brave but lets see what it will do)
Anyone else not heard of Mullvad before?
Everyone in the privacy community knows Mullvad
that's because they don't waste all their money on advertising like nord does
There's no way I'm using a browser that requires me to do MFA on every single site I use regularly, every time I close it. That's such a huge hassle. It's ridiculous that you can't use a cookie whitelist.
You can disable private browsing mode and turn it into a normal browser, though this isn't quite recommended for the core use-case of the browser. -H
@@techlore what is "- H"?
@@techlorehell
Yo cia
Oh look another crapmium browser!
Did you even watch the video, this browser is Firefox based, it has nothing to do with chromium
Silly boy
suspect infographic. vivaldi blocks alot and firefox has become bloated tracking garbage.
Bro Vivaldi is mostly proprietary
It would be nice to have this browser on the phone