Yu-Gi-Oh! Missing The Timing Explained!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1.2K

  • @TheGuyWhoIsSitting
    @TheGuyWhoIsSitting 4 ปีที่แล้ว +538

    “Haha! Yugioh GX has a dueling school! Crowler has a PHD in dueling!”
    ...and this video is why that’s not nearly as ridiculous as it sounds.

    • @local_hotpotato
      @local_hotpotato 4 ปีที่แล้ว +37

      We need a new anime season back in the dueling academy just so they can spend half of the first season going through the meat and potatoes of the current meta... Hell have old supporting chracters from other seasons as teachers

    • @GRosa-xw3rg
      @GRosa-xw3rg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@local_hotpotato what if we got an anime with the plot of duel links?🤔🤔🤔

    • @ippotsk
      @ippotsk 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      I never watched GX until the end, but it'd would've been hilarious if there was a duel with Jaden where he tried to do something he thought was a genius move, only for a referee to point out it's against the rules due to some wacko technicality.

    • @ReeksofChees3
      @ReeksofChees3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@local_hotpotato Sorta like a mix of GX and OCG Structures?

    • @r3zaful
      @r3zaful ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@local_hotpotatoa gx and structure mix would be funny, imagine their teacher start to troll their students in master duel.

  • @cookiecutter6735
    @cookiecutter6735 6 ปีที่แล้ว +854

    _Miss the timing? What's that? Is it when I'm late at locals?_
    - Farfa 2018

    • @MAJORKANI
      @MAJORKANI 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Skill drain me Daddy!

    • @cookiecutter6735
      @cookiecutter6735 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@MAJORKANI
      Opponent: Chain Skill Drain
      Me: Skill Drain indeed man...Skill Drain indeed...

    • @MAJORKANI
      @MAJORKANI 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Random Guy With Big Nose
      It hurts sood good!

    • @pollo_470
      @pollo_470 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bald* 2018

    • @cookiecutter6735
      @cookiecutter6735 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pollo_470 Farfa really is the memes channel.
      We got:
      Bald
      Jeff
      Wrong Chain
      Add more, it's early in the morning, haven't drunk my coffee, can't remember any other memes.

  • @firespawnie537
    @firespawnie537 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1025

    Nuclear physics sounds easier than these yugioh rules...

    • @BmanTheChamp
      @BmanTheChamp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +90

      And you'd get a better return on investment..

    • @reesejackson5935
      @reesejackson5935 6 ปีที่แล้ว +62

      They're about the same really. Just a process to follow that, if done incorrectly, fucks everything up

    • @JustJustin.
      @JustJustin. 6 ปีที่แล้ว +28

      Actually this is one of the EASIER rules to explain, plus it has become mostly irrelevant now that pretty much every card is an IF effect.

    • @imuncomfbecuzihavsubsandno4371
      @imuncomfbecuzihavsubsandno4371 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Champ I see u have an anime profile still a better investment

    • @LilPGKing
      @LilPGKing 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Firespawnie lol you made someone’s day. Congrats stud.

  • @magnaillusion6085
    @magnaillusion6085 5 ปีที่แล้ว +226

    We need a card with an effect that activates when it misses the timing.

    • @Sillimant_
      @Sillimant_ 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      My god... Errata the Yang Zings to have something like that and they'll be a good deck

    • @halo3boy1
      @halo3boy1 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      "if you missed timing, banish all cards in your hand and GY facedown"

  • @EverFortune1
    @EverFortune1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +179

    hey, dude, this is absolutely my fav video you've ever made. I never understood this rule and this was perfectly concise. thanks a lot

  • @WilliWaffles
    @WilliWaffles 6 ปีที่แล้ว +299

    Cimo!! You should make a video explaining the Battle Phase, like, everything about the Battle Phase. I think that would make a great video!!

  • @DemonFox369
    @DemonFox369 6 ปีที่แล้ว +243

    MST negates
    -Cimo

    • @Rahnonymous
      @Rahnonymous 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, effect veiler negates the battle phase
      - Some guy in a crazy Yugioh stories vid from Farfa

    • @hillmanhung3846
      @hillmanhung3846 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, but actually negates the monster effect

  • @walkingtaco3864
    @walkingtaco3864 6 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Ohhhh, that’s why my judge at locals hates me.

  • @hassanainalaa4974
    @hassanainalaa4974 6 ปีที่แล้ว +233

    this is incredibly useful .... thank u man and I hope that u make more content like this explaining difficult terms and rulings

    • @ianr.navahuber2195
      @ianr.navahuber2195 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So know i have to focus on Finding the word WEHn and THEN in cards, but my problem is remembering waht some cards can do in first place

    • @hassanainalaa4974
      @hassanainalaa4974 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ianr.navahuber2195 reading is hard

  • @goldendragonrider5237
    @goldendragonrider5237 6 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    For anyone still struggling with if and when in Optional Effects, here’s the definition that helped me.
    * If = In the circumstance.
    * When = At the moment.
    While you read an optional effect, it’s very useful to replace if/when with their definitions above.
    Remember, Effects cannot activate in the middle of a RESOLVING chain. So, if a card that says "When this card is Special Summoned: You can..." and it is Summoned in any chain-link of 2 or higher. e.g. "Back to the Front" is chained to the opponent's MST. Chain resolves backwards, you special summon, then the monster has met its requirements, but the chain is resolving so nothing yet happens. Then MST destroys a card. Now that the chain has ended, it ended on “a Spell/Trap card was destroyed” which is not the condition required to activate your monster’s effect. Hope that helps. :)

  • @hipsterglasses1990
    @hipsterglasses1990 6 ปีที่แล้ว +106

    I really wish Konami would just fix all cards that can miss timing. Its pretty bs when the card meets the conditions for its effect but because of the word “then” it misses it. Would make the game make much more sense and let cards do what they’re supposed to do
    It’s a total mess and terrible design by Konamis part

    • @thepervertedmonk2353
      @thepervertedmonk2353 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Look at it this way.. Monster effects have "speed" the same way spell and traps do. Some are slow like a spell speed 1 magic card, and can only be used during your own maim phase. But some are very fast, and can even be activated during either players turn like a Spell speed 3 MST.
      Or heres an even clearer example, lets say a card like Ryko the Lightsworn makes you diacard 3 from the top of your deck, problem is you only have 2 cards left in your deck! Ryko being mandatory vs optional would make ALL the difference and would decide the duel. Ryko being mandatory would mwan that you HAVE to discard 3 no matter what and you would lose right then and there. On the other hand, if ryko said "you CAN discard 3 cards, then you could choose not to discard and live another day.
      So if a card gives you a choice "you can, you may" then it is possible for it to miss timing. Id the card doesnt give you a choice, then it can never miss timing amd will activate on a separate chain.

    • @xekon14
      @xekon14 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      The Perverted Monk Spell Speeds are the dumbest thing in existence, just write it on the fuckign card when they can be used (like MtG and Instant & Sorcery speed)

    • @xekon14
      @xekon14 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Gabriel Lopes Well, you wouldn't know that without specifically looking it up (+ nobody cares) which makes it bad gamedesign

    • @catisreckless4647
      @catisreckless4647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@xekon14 Why would you play a game without looking up the rules? That sentence makes zero sense dude.

    • @xekon14
      @xekon14 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Catisreckless It's not intuitive at the very least. If you need a paragraph to explain the speed of different monster effects that are not written on the card it's just bad game design. Missing the timing wouldn't be a thing if it's clear when certain effects activate or not. Just say so on the card if you can only activate it at certain points, which MtG does much simpler and takes less time to explain the intricates of. You have 2 speeds, Sorcery and Instant. Sorcery speed cards and effects can only be activated during your own Main Phase when nothing is on the stack/in the chain and you have priority. Instant speed cards and effects can be activated whenever you have priority and you can activate them unless a card says you can't (Split second for example says that you can't play any other cards after it onto the stack). The stack is much like the chain but you can react with Instant cards at instant speed even in the middle of the stack resolving, like you played a monster, they want to negate it and thus destroy it but in response you can negate their counterspell, but then when the stack starts resolving they cast a second counterspell after their first counterspell has been negated. This works because it's all 1 Casting speed instead of 5 different speeds that can be used at specific different times which just makes the game unnecessarily difficult for newer players. In yu-gi-oh half of your cards you can't activate because they're not the right speed or your opponent activated a counter trap or some stuff that newer players don't care about in the slightest. It's just an unnecessary hurdle to climb over knowing the timing of every single card and monster effect instead of it being just written on the card.

  • @cosmicbox901
    @cosmicbox901 6 ปีที่แล้ว +81

    We don't miss timing, we have happy accidents.
    ... I really like that Bob Ross shirt.

  • @syedwahab2618
    @syedwahab2618 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Thank you so much. For years I've been trying to understand this and just watching this video 1 time helped me understand the infamous "Missing the Timing" ruling

  • @ENCHANTMEN_
    @ENCHANTMEN_ 5 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I kinda feel like "if" vs "when" is a little too vague and non-obvious.
    I feel like it should be errataed such that "When [condition]:" is replaced with "If [condition], and this is the last effect in the chain:"

  • @brenthebli
    @brenthebli 6 ปีที่แล้ว +71

    I wish they’d just axe this rule entirely and have optional-when effects just go off anyway.
    Doubt it tho.

  • @davidiswhat
    @davidiswhat 6 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    This topic along with chains and inherent summons are probably the 3 most core topics for beginners to know.

    • @GamerCainey
      @GamerCainey 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      *shudders in hearing unofficial terminology like inherent summons*

  • @BiggiestayHoopin23
    @BiggiestayHoopin23 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Years later and this video is still relevant and always will be

  • @Linkiscool115
    @Linkiscool115 6 ปีที่แล้ว +197

    i.e. almost the entire yang zing archetype 😪

  • @PharaohofAtlantis
    @PharaohofAtlantis 6 ปีที่แล้ว +150

    This is part of the reason I stopped playing Yu-Gi-Oh. The fact that I can read a card and not fully understand what the card does.

    • @Blue_Firefox
      @Blue_Firefox 6 ปีที่แล้ว +83

      To this day we will never know what pot of greed truly does

    • @TicuTK
      @TicuTK 6 ปีที่แล้ว +63

      That's not a good reason. It's like saying "I stopped trying to learn math because I could read a chapter and not understand what it was telling me." No matter what the idea is if it requires timing and strategic play then you'll have to look more in depth than just reading the card (or chapter). That goes without saying that the rule book does a horrible job explaining ALL the steps in a turn and ways to chain link. Cimo does a great job at explaining how things should be done and uses examples that clearly show what he is talking about

    • @seefor8538
      @seefor8538 6 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Trevor has a point

    • @lvl5Vaporeon
      @lvl5Vaporeon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      When is an evil word.

    • @valdelamer
      @valdelamer 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Trevor Klinebriel Sorry I want just playing a fucking card game if I want to read something I have news paper. In the old days of YuGiOh it wasn‘t as complex as now. The simple style of playing was the reason for yugioh getting popular and trendy. If someone new want to play it they are averse of these long cards description complexity.

  • @Dramatic_Gaming
    @Dramatic_Gaming 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    I'm curious how all this "if/when" stuff started, because I doubt that it was intentional.

    • @6210classick
      @6210classick 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      When: you can effects has actually been part of the game from the beginning but because the game back then used to be so much slower, it didn't cause any problems, until Yang-Zing came along which is a deck that is apparently has gotten purposely nurfed with all their monsters being "when: you can" that it caused issues in tournaments so ever since then, not many cards are now being printed that can miss timing although for some odd reason, the main deck monsters of Rokkets can miss timing

    • @TheItalianoAssassino
      @TheItalianoAssassino 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      In oldschool Yugioh!, you rarely even saw a Chain link 3.

    • @elisha7231
      @elisha7231 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      My guess is it was never konamis intention it worked like this, they just used diffrent text on some cards, but it got caught up in semantics and got popped into existence

    • @neowolf09
      @neowolf09 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheItalianoAssassino if you did, it was usually for end game in my experience. Judgment of Anubis ftw back then.

    • @eliascsjunior
      @eliascsjunior 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is always good to remember, first in Japanese, then in other languages. This concept was purposedly created by Konami. Japanese is a completely different language from European languages. This difference was always clear to the Japanese players. However, in fact, there were some minstralated cards that are corrected in their next printings because "If and when mandatory effects" are an identical concept and there is no need for two different words.

  • @icantth1nkofab3tt3rname6
    @icantth1nkofab3tt3rname6 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    All when’s needs to be errata’d to if’s for simplicity and not having to worry about timing in general I know it sounds petty but it will help clear everything up

    • @hi-i-am-atan
      @hi-i-am-atan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Mandatory whens are being errata'd to ifs, actually. It helps clear it up a little bit, since the when vs. if part is completely irrelevant for mandatory effects, and a mandatory effect is closer to an if anyway.

    • @jannis4387
      @jannis4387 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Would completely screw with the balance of the game.

    • @nightshroud9671
      @nightshroud9671 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I feel like certain cards like Pinch Hopper needs an errata.
      I am pretty sure originally it can trigger off if you tribute for a tribute summon, but now miss the timing stuff screws it up.

    • @TainyaGaming
      @TainyaGaming 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@jannis4387 what balance

    • @Maxim0M1
      @Maxim0M1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TainyaGaming Missing the timing was a thing that was designed on purpose to make certain cards weaker. Cards that don't miss timing are stronger ( so they're usually balanced out by being more difficult to summon, support a weak archetype, needing more resources to be brought out, etc). Asking for "missing the timing" to be removed is akin to making every card that requires life points to be paid to always cost 500LP; some cards require a higher cost of LP because their effects are usually stronger than cards that require smaller LP cost.

  • @henriquefonseca5721
    @henriquefonseca5721 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    *Siding 3 Soul Takers for my Paleo Frogs matches*

  • @parkerray10
    @parkerray10 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Big Brain Cimoooooooo sharing his information this video was actually so help full. Thanks Cimoooooooo for the info!

  • @ohnosmoarlulcatz
    @ohnosmoarlulcatz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    I still think missing the timing is still one of the dumbest things in Yugioh. You should not be able to miss the timing if you are never given the option to activate it. The cards that are stacked as part of the chain should all resolve simultaneously.

    • @poluicionador
      @poluicionador 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      Im pretty sure this rule is accidental.

    • @TalynWulf
      @TalynWulf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +30

      It is. It really is the dumbest thing. In MTG, you can target anything still on the stack, so even if you are somehow 10 cards deep in the stack, you target the first card cast in the stack with a counterspell.

    • @hipsterglasses1990
      @hipsterglasses1990 6 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      Konami could easy make a rule to fix this terrible design flaw and cards could actually do what they’re supposed to do

    • @Roter-MooN
      @Roter-MooN 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      But that is exactly the problem isn’t it? If you could simultaneously activate everything that would lead to a lot of chicken/egg like situations. That’s why chain link exists. This rule supports chain link. I don’t see the futility in that.

    • @ohnosmoarlulcatz
      @ohnosmoarlulcatz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Chain links are the ones that creates the chicken/egg situation in the first place. Simultaneous ignores the order of the activation during the resolution phase because all effects are considered to be triggered at the same time. Cards like Dark Bribe are considered to target the last card played prior to it (no spell speed otherwise can change this fact) and there is nothing you can do to interfere in it other than another negation. But, these cards still target specific cards on the stack. Once all the cards desired are played, their effects resolve, pulling the negated ones out of the stack and then letting everything else play its course. Then, all the cards are sent to the graveyard at the same time after the cards resolve, preventing any cards from ever missing the timing.

  • @imjustherefortehlulz
    @imjustherefortehlulz 6 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    Captions say "hey guys, it's emo here" 😂

    • @ledgerschroeder
      @ledgerschroeder 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Imao true

    • @JL-ut4md
      @JL-ut4md 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Dissonance you guys both have the same picture lol

    • @catisreckless4647
      @catisreckless4647 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Look up a TH-camr called "SkillzWG". The captions has a... let's say interesting take on the way he introduces himself.

  • @KingSega
    @KingSega 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is something that's never discussed when playing casually (specifically with friends). So I know we've been playing duels incorrectly due to not applying this rule.
    Really appreciate this video, cat. 👍🏾

  • @exokid9799
    @exokid9799 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Tbh, this is actually a really good thing for me to learn because I'm starting to get into yugioh and I'm thinking about competitive wise too. I'll be doing more research about chain links and card readings like this video. I never really knew cards can miss timing based on what occurs last 😶 Thanks for the amazing video Cimo!

  • @HopUpOutDaBed
    @HopUpOutDaBed 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the only video I've ever watched that actually explains this properly. Most people just say "look for if and when" without explaining WHY something misses timing.

  • @hi-i-am-atan
    @hi-i-am-atan 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Here's a bit more detail about conjunctions and what they means ( in PSCT, of course, with cards that predate it you just have to pray and hope there's rulings for the card about action timing ):
    ● "and," "and, if you do," and "also" are all _simultaneous_ conjunctions - that is, if the actions linked by them are the last thing to occur, "when" effects can respond to either action.
    ● "then" and "also, after that" are both _sequential_ conjuctions. As this video covered, "when" effects can only ever respond to the second action, as it occurs _after_ the first.
    Note also the simultaneous and sequential terminology; cards like Ryko and Kunai with Chain that allow activating or applying multiple effects also include these terms for much the same purpose, with simultaneous effects allowing "when" effects to respond to either while sequential ( or, specifically, "in sequence" ) effects only allowing "when" effects to respond to the final one. However, note that while there's two categories, there's actually five conjunctions. This isn't actually superfluous, as conjunctions are _also_ important for determining whether or not an effect's actions fizzle or not, namely:
    ● "and" requires _both_ actions to be able to resolve, otherwise both will fizzle. You can mostly see this with Union monsters, which have to both unequip _and_ Special Summon themselves to "de-unionize," but you can also see it with Gallis the Star Bird, who only burns the opponent if he Special Summons himself ( i.e. your opponent doesn't activate Vanity's in response to you revealing him as a cost ) and vice-versa.
    ● "and, if you do," and "then" requires the first part to resolve to resolve the second part, but not vice-versa; the Metalfoes monsters' Pendulum effects will not let you search if the monster itself doesn't pop the card ( i.e. you activate it and target your other scale, but your opponent responds with MST and pops it as Chain Link 2 ), but if every piece of Metalfoes backrow is removed from your Deck before the pop resolves, your scale will still pop the card even though you can no longer perform the search. Moving back to Gallis, note that his effect mills the top card of your Deck, _then_ burns and Special Summons him; this means that even if Vanity's gets flipped in response, you still have to mill, unlike what happens with the burn part.
    ● "also" and "also, after that" are the most lax; as long as the effect resolves, both parts happen to the best of their ability, no matter if the other part is possible or not. Vanity's gets flipped in response to your Goblindbergh? It'll still go into Defense Position. Can't re-Set Scrap-Iron Scarecrow because it got popped by MST after you activated it? Well, you'll still get the attack negated.
    As you can see, each conjunction is unique in its combination of timing and how much the two parts rely on each other. Knowing this is pretty important to judge an effect properly, as a single different word can radically swing how vulnerable an effect is to disruption as well as how strong it is to disrupt plays. And, as you'd expect from Konami, they've graciously and carefully made it so that learning this in any official manner is a _complete_ pain in the ass, so don't feel too bad if you didn't know anything about this!

    • @Myusernamerulez
      @Myusernamerulez 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I still don't get it...

    • @Zaidon7
      @Zaidon7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      arctangent
      I cannot read that comment and have someone convince me that this is a card game for children.

  • @fwant2729
    @fwant2729 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    as someone who enjoys yugioh content but doesn't actually play the game, this was extremely helpful in understanding some things I didn't understand before.

  • @Stephen__White
    @Stephen__White 6 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Okay I realise that it's the rulings and all, but this all just seems dumb. Let's take the Enemy Controller Dupe Frog example. In my mind, the effect chain would go.
    Activate Enemy Controller -> Tribute Dupe Frog -> Dupe Frog searches -> Take control of the targeted monster
    Because that's how the effects would go, you tribute the dupe frog and it says "when" so it should force it's effect into the middle of the Enemy Controller effect because that IS when it's going to the graveyard.
    Same idea with the Goblinbergh Armageddon knight example.
    Summons Goblinbergh -> Special Summons Armageddon Knight -> Armageddon Knight dumps -> Goblinbergh switches to defence position.
    Maybe it's just me, but when I read a "When" in a card text to me that means it forces itself into the chain no matter what. Honestly the current system seems to just create more confusion then it's worth. I mean with how it works Dupe Frog can't really be used for anything other then like Dark Hole fodder. Because from how you explained it, even if you tribute summon with it, it would miss timing because the last thing to happen would be the tribute summoned monster entering the field.
    I mean I get it can add some strategy to the game, but at the same time it just makes cards that say "when" seem almost worthless. I mean why would I play a card, or deck that can have almost all of it's effects stopped by my opponent using a throw away effect? A card should never have it's effect not go off unless another card is specifically negating that cards effect. But as I said it's the rules so what I think doesn't matter. Though my idea would likely make the game a lot less confusing.

    • @albinothumbs
      @albinothumbs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Enemy controller takes control of the monster first. You can't resolve dupe frog's effect before enemy controller has finished resolving.

    • @GamerCainey
      @GamerCainey 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      The fundamental rule of "no chains within chains" is why what you're suggesting isn't allowed. But yes this is how it would attempt to activate/resolve if we didnt have that rule.

    • @antoniopoblete5510
      @antoniopoblete5510 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I rather have:
      Activate Enemy Controller -> Tribute Dupe Frog -> Take control of the targeted monster-> Dupe Frog searches
      Because it feels weird to interrup the effect of a single card.

    • @pierreshi6102
      @pierreshi6102 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      lmao If is like if it happens, you do it. When is more concerned with time, so you can chain block and make them miss

    • @pierreshi6102
      @pierreshi6102 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      also, what's wrong with blocking? are you salty because your a frog player that keeps getting blocked? Lemme tell you that you have to use another card to block usually (unless you have a "Then" card), so it means your opponent is wasting a resouce to keep yourself from using that resource. It's bascially a trade off, not that bad for neither one of you. Back in the days when MST was 3 in every deck, duuuuuuude forcing your opponent to waste one could potentially mean you could mirror force and go for win (or just magic cylinder for the win).

  • @Peaches51492
    @Peaches51492 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    seriously I'm only 30 seconds into the video but THANK YOU! I've seriously been waiting for someone to explain this forever and I know this is gonna be so helpful

  • @jl2398
    @jl2398 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    My friends: hey I wanna learn yugioh can you teach me??
    Me: um...

  • @squirly182
    @squirly182 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much for this! I’ve been EXTREMELY confused on this term, and this cleared everything up! Thanks again!

  • @TheItalianoAssassino
    @TheItalianoAssassino 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Cimo's child's first sentence: "Chain resolves backwards"

  • @machinayrequiem8596
    @machinayrequiem8596 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let me make this easy for you all. The only wording that can miss timing is "When, you can" everything else doesnt miss timing.
    I appreciate the in-depth breakdown as someone who likes longer and more broken down videos that get into the nuances of things.

  • @maximillionchaoswolf
    @maximillionchaoswolf 6 ปีที่แล้ว +92

    its pretty much my least favorite feature of this game and I just cant see an upside too it.

    • @anonymoususer69
      @anonymoususer69 6 ปีที่แล้ว +40

      Maximillion Chaoswolf I agree, it adds a lot of complexity to the game with no real benefit. The only potential benefit I can see would be as a way to balance archetypes so that several powerful effects can’t go off at once, but that would require Konami to try and balance the game

    • @RadiantAeon
      @RadiantAeon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@anonymoususer69 It mattered when Paleo existed. It also makes Dupe Frog not busted when making Mistar Boy, or when using it with Toad. It makes for a higher level of play whenever a competing deck uses "When" effect.

    • @willlast2015
      @willlast2015 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Noah Llorens burrrrn!

    • @Relisoc4
      @Relisoc4 6 ปีที่แล้ว +39

      it makes no logical sense. two things can happen at the same time. it's like if your mom tells you to clean your room at 5 o clock and you try to make up some bullshit about how it's not 'exactly' 5 o clock one second after 5:00 pm, it's now 5:00:01 so therefore you don't have to clean

    • @RadiantAeon
      @RadiantAeon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +51

      @@Relisoc4 Sorry mom, I missed the timing.

  • @dmcdante8845
    @dmcdante8845 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This helped more when missing the timing. So many other videos just feels like they drag the video. You got to the point and gave some examples. I want to give some examples. Thank you for the help.

  • @lvl5Vaporeon
    @lvl5Vaporeon 6 ปีที่แล้ว +52

    Yang Zing's mortal enemy!

    • @frozenlavareflector
      @frozenlavareflector 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Add crystrons to that list, its frustrating when you realise that both trishula and black rose miss the timing

  • @sepra7262
    @sepra7262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but I also found this quote from yugipedia that seems like an important note. "When a player takes an action that does not start a chain, that action is the last thing to happen. For example, setting a Spell/Trap Card, summoning a monster, or declaring an attack."

    • @yohinio_0712
      @yohinio_0712 ปีที่แล้ว

      These actions don't start a chain but they will trigger a chain, and the fact that the chain resolves backwards so the last thing has to be the thing that started a chain, but it doesn't necessarily mean that the last thing to happen has to be one of these actions.

  • @chaos_magician6689
    @chaos_magician6689 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    ah, the old days when I used to play chaos dragons and had to remember that lightpulsar misses when using starlight’s effect

  • @vanishingstone1637
    @vanishingstone1637 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Holy crap! Thank God I watched this video because I didn´t know that "When" condition. You definitely get a thumbs up from me for this video.

  • @therealcroman
    @therealcroman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    When, You Can: The bane of every player's existence since the 1990s. Fun fact. You can auto-win against a Psy-Frame deck by not activating your mandatory effects. Normal Summon and smash face vanilla beatdown style. That deck's Achilles heel is nothing happening. It's a satisfying punishment for a deck that exists solely to not let your opponent play the game.

    • @ShuraEssays
      @ShuraEssays 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alpha can be summoned in response to a normal summon, so you've already given them a play to make. You actually play something like Diamond Core of Koa'ki Meiru to skip your draw phase and deck out . . . Despite giving them a spell effect to negate . . . Just play 41 cards ir something. I know you can't side into a 41 card deck, but hey. You also can't not activate your mandatory effect.

    • @LAsuperfly94
      @LAsuperfly94 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I.e. Phantasm Spiral

    • @IBenin16I
      @IBenin16I 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LAsuperfly94 except phantasm spiral doesn't rely on your opponent doing things, and it's a much more versatile activation condition.

    • @therealcroman
      @therealcroman 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Is that right. Every time I play against the deck, they are sitting on a fat hand of hand traps and once they reveal they are playing Psy-Frame, I just Normal Summon and attack each turn until I win. They probably are maxed out on effect negation pieces and 1-offing the other stuff. That or the deck is incredibly inconsistent. Which is why it's a not on the radar casual annoyance deck. Whatever the case, I love when "you shall not play Yu-Gi-Oh" decks fail, especially when the deck's mechanics are used against the deck.

    • @Xsar1998
      @Xsar1998 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Of course, it is not good enough against modern decks. Also it never really won anything back when it was good because Kozmo was the best deck and so whatever people were siding for Kozmo (Imperial Iron Wall, Chaos Hunter) was also auto-win against psy frames because their win condition is banishing your stuff

  • @DigitalxGamer
    @DigitalxGamer 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes! This is something I could not understand for years. I've played the game casually for ages now, playing all kinds of video games mostly, and I kept seeing the phrase "Missed Timing!" pop up now and again and...it was kinda frustrating since I could never find any source that gave good examples or made it easy to understand. Even after reading the wiki page on missed timing, I thought I would put it into practice, but then cards I thought would miss timing didn't.
    But this made it so much easier to understand. The examples helped big time. Thanks~

  • @kenshiroorjotarowithawhite829
    @kenshiroorjotarowithawhite829 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Lightpulsar Dragon would be so broken with REDMD if it wouldn't miss timing. Eternal loops for Link spam, lol.

  • @cydra-evolution5623
    @cydra-evolution5623 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ive been trying to permanently learn this ruling for YEARS thanks Cimoooooo

  • @robertjackson2786
    @robertjackson2786 6 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Wait a sec, you can chain MST in response to Suanni's summon and still activate TT? TT has "When" in its text, so shouldn't the last thing to occur be Suanni's summoning so it can activate? Or is it because MST hasn't resolved yet, so it's still legal to activate TT? Sorry if it's a stupid question, just trying to understand.

    • @jacobandriola8726
      @jacobandriola8726 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You're correct. The example he gave is an illegal activation of TT. Since TT says when it has to be in direct response to the summon of a monster.

    • @dustyplays9394
      @dustyplays9394 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      MST's effect hasn't resolved yet, hence why suanni misses timing.

    • @josephhutchison9952
      @josephhutchison9952 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're right. A better example would be to substitute TT for raigeki break where the target would be Suanni. Raigeki break destroys Suanni; Suanni misses its timing because MST was the last card to resolve. Just so you know, summoning does not start a chain. You can activate cards when they are summoned, but they are not "chained" to the summon. TT would be CL1 when a monster is summoned.

    • @d4rkfog875
      @d4rkfog875 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      no, he's wrong, when you are starting a chain, the "last event" always relates to the last event before Starting the Chain, so for the whole Chain, the summon is considered to be the last event to happen

    • @House_Of_Champs
      @House_Of_Champs 6 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Torrential does not have to be DIRECTLY to the summon. Let's say I summon cir and my opponent activated bottomless trap hole, I can still activate torrential here as long as it is in the specific chain responding to the summon. Similar to how if I activate mirror force, my opponent book of moons their monster cl2, as long as it's the same chain, cl3 I can use another mirror force. Unlike Ash blossom that has to be directly in chain, torrential/mirror force only care about which chain theyre activate in response to for their window.

  • @zerkuwitherblight
    @zerkuwitherblight 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't tell you how many times the wording on cards for this issue has confused me and screwed me over in a game. This video helped so much! Thanks Cimo!! ^_^

  • @GamerCainey
    @GamerCainey 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't know if you really did it justice though. Good for a basic idea of how it works.
    You missing sequential effects with the conjunction "also, after that" as well as effects with "also" and "and if you do"
    Should also cover how timing works works with SEGOC and building chains. For instance, the very issue that Robert Jackson has in these comments with confusion about how Torrential Tribute works if you can activate MST before TT or not.

  • @PaulTaitful
    @PaulTaitful 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love this, as a player just getting back into it this is very helpful to understand Yu-Gi-Oh! Competitively 👌

  • @ethanevans3537
    @ethanevans3537 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Literally the whole damn Yang Zing archetype misses timing 😂 I know I play them

    • @tequilasunrise9667
      @tequilasunrise9667 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Denglong doesn't miss timing. He's banned tho

  • @alannnc
    @alannnc 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    My fav video till now CIMO, probably an examples of meta decks and missing time would be nice too.

  • @rueblie2627
    @rueblie2627 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    So what you’re telling me is MST negates the effects.

  • @chipan9191
    @chipan9191 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are also ways to take away an opponent’s response window to certain cards. Say your opponent has a ton of counter traps and you have a fire lake you could use to take out their back row. If you have a bait doll, you could force the activation of your own fire lake causing your opponent to miss the activation response window making it impossible for them to counter your trap card. Why? Because bait doll activates your card as part of its resolution, which means the activation response window of fire lake comes and goes during bait doll’s resolving effect. Your opponent cannot activate effects while a chain is resolving, which means they cannot respond to your fire lake in this scenario.

  • @phillewis3180
    @phillewis3180 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gotta stop them light pulsars from going off

  • @DuelingNetwork100
    @DuelingNetwork100 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A few additions to the explanations:
    "After" has the same implications as "then" (which was kind of explained with Goblindbergh despite you claiming it said "then" when it clearly does not say "then").
    The reason you cannot activate Dupe Frog in response to Enemy Controller in the example given at about 7:30 to anyone questioning it is that Trigger Effects have a Spell Speed of 1, so they cannot activate in response to other effects (except in a specific ruling case regarding multiple Trigger Effects). You might say this contradicts the use of Torrential Tribute in response to MST but that is not the case because Torrential Tribute has a Spell Speed of 2 (for being the activation of a Trap Card). The rules of "missing the timing" do not work the same, but rather the condition of Torrential Tribute needs a monster being summoned to be the last thing before the current chain to occur. It's kind of the same thing, but not really.

  • @runningoncylinders3829
    @runningoncylinders3829 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Gonna keep this in mind for Duel Links because any Anki hate is much appreciated.
    I can't stand the fact that he's able to float into himself mid-Battle-Phase and OTK out of nowhere.

    • @magiic3871
      @magiic3871 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Runningon Cylinders how does missing timing help with anki lol?

    • @runningoncylinders3829
      @runningoncylinders3829 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Magic Clan His floating effect to search Mask Change is a "when" effect which means it can miss timing.
      You'll probably be able to survive until the next turn if it's only 1 of him you have to worry about.

    • @GamerCainey
      @GamerCainey 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      "When this card destroys an opponent's monster by battle and sends it to the Graveyard:"
      Pretty hard to get that to miss timing, if you find a way. let me know.

  • @SunHawk13
    @SunHawk13 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    New yugioh player here! Crusadia being my first deck, so I was wondering about the "whens" and "ifs", Reclusia's wording made me wonder about this. This video was so helpful! Thank you! Subscribed!

  • @DominatorLegend
    @DominatorLegend 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    If I'd been given a penny for every player that said "Crooked Cook + Geartown is an OP combo"...

    • @the_v_blade
      @the_v_blade 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It only works when you control only Crooked Cook and no other monsters.

    • @DominatorLegend
      @DominatorLegend 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The V-Blade And by that time it's hard to consider it OP (specially in MR4)

    • @the_v_blade
      @the_v_blade 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@DominatorLegend I'm an AG player myself, and I wouldn't call it OP. Not a bad play tho, especially if summoning Reactor Dragon, or Wyvern for a search.

    • @DominatorLegend
      @DominatorLegend 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The V-Blade Of course it's not OP, but certain Yugituber who uploads the "best" decks of every archetype thinks so.

  • @thatbritishdude1672
    @thatbritishdude1672 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    A bit late to the party but I have to say this was very helpful. In duel links I was constantly confused when some how my Yubel would miss it's timing and would really feel like I was cheated out of a win. But this .. very helpful stuff. Keep up the good work.

  • @nipthekitten7002
    @nipthekitten7002 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Finally one of these videos. Really needed the help. ^-^)/

  • @alanducks6842
    @alanducks6842 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally I get this mechanic! Thank you Cimooo I only just have gotten back into Yu-Gi-Oh and your videos have been SOO Helpful!

  • @wakkablockablaw6025
    @wakkablockablaw6025 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is a very stupid and confusing rule in yugioh. Konami please remove it.

    • @osiris9128
      @osiris9128 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is confusing, but removing it would make certain cards and decks just much better

  • @ripleycastle5668
    @ripleycastle5668 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, I totally get it. It’s amazing imagining how much missing the timing can drastically impact gameplay.

  • @RanserSSF4
    @RanserSSF4 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    "How to miss timing featuring the Yang Zings. How do you guys feel about you guys always missing the timing?"
    "It's BULLS***"
    "well there you guys go, coming up next, When is the next banlist coming?"

    • @GatorRay
      @GatorRay 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      9/11

  • @olivergrams5212
    @olivergrams5212 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Boom like that I started playing Magic the Gathering and never looked back

  • @bradsubject3641
    @bradsubject3641 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    You need to hire a lawyer to help you play Yugioh now a days

  • @MohamedAli-wz4tp
    @MohamedAli-wz4tp 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you cimooooo you made something that is harder than the under standing of the universe seem soo easy I understood everything it was all so clear thank you again

  • @Alexiel-f6o
    @Alexiel-f6o 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    i mean timing in yu gi oh is very uhm weird, comign from someone who played yu gi oh then went ot magic, magics stack is far easier to understand

  • @stevelappy
    @stevelappy ปีที่แล้ว

    Ok, this is the first time I’m grateful I took took classical logic one semester in uni lmao. Thanks for the great explanation, makes so much sense now.

  • @Wizard_Lizard_
    @Wizard_Lizard_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a unnecessarily complex and needless mechanic. I hope other TCGs don't ever have anything this ridiculous.

    • @JoeDirtisawsome
      @JoeDirtisawsome 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      apparently magic does this too

  • @Darth555
    @Darth555 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was playing Legacy of the Duelist link evolution and this prompt had come up with my Armageddon Knight. In 20 years I have never seen this ruling come up, either digitally or in real life (mind you I'm not a pro or competitive, just a casual).
    Thank you for making this easy to understand. 👍

  • @xxdinorabbitxxschannel5083
    @xxdinorabbitxxschannel5083 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i imagine you made a follow up video on missing the timing, because the definition of missing the timing you put in the previous video was quite atrocious when considering the mindset of a new player

  • @yugidumbyugidummer9711
    @yugidumbyugidummer9711 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video literally solved the most confusing part of ygo for me thank you very much

  • @DemonFox369
    @DemonFox369 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why am I watching this? I know it.

    • @torybio13
      @torybio13 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      good for you champ

    • @TheDarknightRemix
      @TheDarknightRemix 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same

    • @GamerCainey
      @GamerCainey 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The cimooo has you now. Follow the White Rabbit.

  • @omega5040
    @omega5040 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    If effects activate after resolution. For example I activate darklight, trubute a dark monster I control as cost to do a board wipe. I can chain Darkest Diabolos after the effect, to summon itself after the board wipe because he has if a monster was tributed.
    It would go like so, pay cost to activate (tribute) > do board wipe > chain effect to summon

  • @IcarusAtreides
    @IcarusAtreides 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even for people that know this by heart like me, this video is a MUST SEE!

  • @ChillyCharizard006
    @ChillyCharizard006 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not being able to use Dragon Spirit Of White’s effect when I chain Sliver’s Cry always confused me. (Yes I play DL)
    Normal activation: A-Ok
    Chain Activation: Hol up!!
    This helps a lot, thanks Cemooooo!

    • @ryandebosscher6821
      @ryandebosscher6821 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I feel your pain bro, both a year ago and currently when I break out my Blue Eyes deck lol, and respect for the real Blue-Eyes artwork btw

  • @ashtonropp7029
    @ashtonropp7029 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This cleared up everything about timing for me. Thanks man, you’re the best

  • @arthurscheibe8745
    @arthurscheibe8745 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for explaining this, I've been having this problem with Stratos on Dueling Nexus and couldn't figure out why

  • @TheJudofreak1
    @TheJudofreak1 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man, how many time have I been "duped" by that frog, not realizing it actually misses it's timing...
    Thx mate :D

  • @okeanos317
    @okeanos317 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks,now I finally understand draw frog,oyster meister and fish depth charge

  • @hubalpl3052
    @hubalpl3052 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have watched you for a while and I quite liked your content but never was convinced enough to actually sub. This video convinced me :D I have never seen such a good explanation of this topic and since I just start my adventure with yu-gi-oh it was a great help for me :) Great work!

  • @epicdude8742
    @epicdude8742 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is why Cimo is the best channel for new players.

  • @chsportsdude892
    @chsportsdude892 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This makes things soo much easier to understand... thank you!

  • @gagabarbidou5975
    @gagabarbidou5975 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks. That was one of the few rules I was still having trouble with. You really helped me

  • @aiRCoft
    @aiRCoft 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ah yes, the golden days of _Cimoooooooo..._ R.I.P.

  • @RGYGO
    @RGYGO 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you soooooo much for this video, cimo. It’s so frustrating explaining to frog players why tributing dupe frog for toadally awesome will make dupe frog miss timing

  • @Zester141
    @Zester141 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Finally someone talks about this, kudos to you man great channel!

  • @zeinixdexdesigns2005
    @zeinixdexdesigns2005 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This (after verifying by watching Cimo's terms video) is the only term that still jabs my mind when making out plays at times. I guess I... miss-time the cards!
    Ok I'll show myself out...

  • @ComDenox
    @ComDenox 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome video! I already knew some things about missing the timing, but didn't know about the "then" interaction. Like someone already suggested, it would be great to see something regarding battles, like Damage step and all those obscure sub-phases.
    Also, thanks TH-cam for the five (Goddamn, FIVE) ads you gave me in this video. If it wasn't for good youtubers like Cimoooooooo I would have already uninstalled the app.

  • @truevizard
    @truevizard 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video was well needed! Kinda now see Soul Taker as a potential problem solver especially against Altergeist

  • @TheRMJQandA
    @TheRMJQandA 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please more vids explaining more mechanics like this, i mean i already had a grip on missing timing but a good refresh is always nice especially when explained so well, also for the poeple who disnt quitw get it i think it helped them out to as i mentioned this was explained so well

  • @johnthepro7137
    @johnthepro7137 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is something I didn't know. Thank you a lot Cimo!!

  • @Sonichellsfire
    @Sonichellsfire 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You don't understand how long I've been waiting for this vid

  • @ceeagelevair3630
    @ceeagelevair3630 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I only like this for the astounding explosion on that scoop frog. Ahhh the sound ....

  • @Zeroforce14
    @Zeroforce14 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    I play Harpies which teach about Mandatory effects (the field spell)
    Darklords which teach about When timing (Superbia)
    and Super Quantums, which teach both 'if' and 'when' timings (Red, Blue, and Green)

  • @haj_u_pub
    @haj_u_pub 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    ty Cimoooooooo, been waiting for such a video for a long time :D

  • @vysusvt
    @vysusvt 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is the first time I've ever understood this. Just as well as I'm just getting abck into the game (after becoming certain Futurecard Buddyfight is collapsing here in the UK)

  • @gabrielmondrianferreira6381
    @gabrielmondrianferreira6381 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wow, im playing duel links using water decks like ice barrier/water xyz and im missing the time of Graydle Dragon/ Hope Woven Spider Shark effect in grave so often that hurts my heart.
    But now at least i can understand why this happen, thank you !