Never Do This In Court!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2023
- Make Sure You Don't Make These Mistakes When You Go To Court. Subscribe to @LawByMike for more tips! Featuring @GwenSinger
⭐ Become a member of THE INNER CIRCLE to get exclusive perks⭐
th-cam.com/users/lawbymikejoin
⚖️ Questions? Issues?👇
👉 DM me on FB: go.lawbymike.com/Query
👉 DM me the word QUERY on IG: ig.me/m/lawbymike
📲 OR TEXT 279-529-6453 (279-LAW-MIKE)
👻 Join My Snapchat: go.lawbymike.com/SNAP
📸 Instagram: go.lawbymike.com/IG
📘 Facebook: go.lawbymike.com/FB
▶️ Subscribe To My TH-cam: go.lawbymike.com/YT
🎵 TikTok: go.lawbymike.com/TikTok
📰 Need PR Help? Check Out Otter PR: go.lawbymike.com/PR
#judge #law #lawyer #lawbymike #repeatafterme #tiktok #youtubeshorts #cop #cops #lawyers #legal #attorney #lawschool #hacks #legal
DISCLAIMER (Of course, I'd have one 😁)
Hey, you might think that this info makes me your lawyer, but it doesn’t and I’m not. Sorry, but I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER unless we have an engagement agreement. I am just providing public information here, like a library does, and am not providing you with legal advice about your situation. So, it would be totally unreasonable for you to conclude we have an attorney-client relationship just because you're viewing this information.
Subscribe to Law By Mike For More Tips! go.lawbymike.com/YT
Hi
Mike law tips
Linus tech tips
There's a connection
Be my attorney
Mike I have a question that I would appreciate being answered just out of pure curiosity. There are these groups of people(adults) going around online pretending to be young children to lure child predators out and expose them online, to the police, etc. Then they meet up with these grown adults (child predators), call the police and tell them what was being said between the 2 parties. Is this considered legal? Isn't this technically considered entrapment? Can legal charges result from this for the child predators? Its kind of a knock off Chris Hansen deal but the police aren't involved in the luring out process and I was just curious what happens once the police get involved and from a legal standpoint. I know this maybe a tall order for you but I want to know what happens next....much appreciated.
To me court should only be used for justice an not for I sue you for money court system should only be used for crime in my opinion Americas fucked
What a saul Goodman response on that first example
hey
Hi
I hid a battery in chuck’s pocket (don’t tell him)
“Oh! Mr. Goodman!”
"It's all good man"
Most important thing to not do in court:
Be guilty.
You are a lifesaver dude!!
Just because you did it doesn't mean you're guilty
@@cwlogan13 did what
@@josephleebob3828 it
Most important thing is don't be FOUND guilty. You can do the crime and get away with it.
Bruh they’re straight up spying on him. 💀
Next thing, you see the FBI out of everyone's windows.
@@asheep7797 Fr my guy 💀
I mean, he was inside the courthouse during recess and they overhead him on the phone.
He's talking about elsewhere he was talking in the building.
You do realize of how many robot birds, ufos, drones they use to spy on Americans it’s fucked up
Don’t smile in your mugshot either, because the Court will also use that to claim you “have no remorse for your actions.” This happens during really bad cases, though.
What actions? I didn't even do anything.
@@xtranormal23 In the event that you DID do something, I apologize.
If your attorney is great, that won't matter. You get your mug before being tried, sometimes long before. There's no good reason to do it, but you'd be surprised the good arguments a good attorney could bring forth if you did smile.
And if you don't smile, they can show the mugshot and go 'look how menacing this person looks'
honestly, mugshots are something that you will never win bonus points with. Pretty much no matter how you take them, you'll look guilty just by virtue of being in a mugshot at all.
@@saphironkindris when have they ever said “look how menacing this person looks”
For the first one, I have no risk bcs as a French person, I will only answer “it depends” I admit, it’s probably gonna make the judge mad, well… I mean : it depends on the judge, it depends on his mood, it depends on the questions ….
Ça dépend mdr
@@dejvidcera2748 eso depende lol
The Universal Answer!
@@dejvidcera2748 mdr is lol in french?
@@charnalk5572 holy shit
Sometimes I feel like it's "don't say anything because someone will figure out how to twist your perfectly innocent words into maniacal threats"
If you don't speak they will think you're guilty and an accomplice who doesn't know what to lie
@@LWLProductions that doesnt really work in a courtroom case, you have that right while being arrested and in police custody and that's the only time you have the right to plead the fifth
That's exactly what is said as you're read your rights- "Everything you say can and WILL be used against you"
@@bloddrinkerakaNot if you explicitly invoke the 5th Amenent. That cannot be held against you ever.
@@TemplarfreakThat is literally a constitutional right you can invoke it.
As a professional juror, I always hold any kind of dumb debate tactics, against the lawyer presenting them. Such as, “So, you’re saying a campfire is bad?!” This isn’t the debate team, buddy, this is the real world.
I was let go from a jury pool because I was former military (Infantry) and the prosecution most certainly didn't want me there. This was a case of a store owner shooting a shoplifter who had a visible knife on him but not in his hand
Exactly. That shit should have the lawyer cited then if continued lose his license.
I think the example in the short is just a very extreme example though?
So, you’re a terrible juror. You are supposed to base your decision on evidence and the merits of the case, not how much you like the lawyer.
@@roguespearsf that's so sad! Do you know what the results of that case were?
My honour, if you are what you eat, then my client is an innocent man
- Saul Goodman
underrated dude, this is perfect.
@@desmondcooley1777 underrated because it was copied
I don’t think innocent is edible. 😂
@@xenird copied, sure, cited, yes. It says “- sail Goodman” at the bottom, if I use a joke that I didn’t make under a video, and it fits the context, it’s not copied, if I say “why did the chicken cross the road? To get to the other side” under a video about chickens crossing roads to get it the other side, yes it’s not original, no it isn’t copied, half the work is finding the right context to put something in.
The justice system in the first one be like
"We dont care, we gona transgiverse your words until you sound guilty"
I am a 16 year old boy who is in foster care. The CPS office in my home town was bought over by another company named St. Francis Ministries. This company has no interest in actually helping children though. They only wanted a paycheck, and they would do anything and everything to get it. Well, once it was me and my siblings turn to be screwed over by them by removing us from our placement of over a year with false allegations of abuse, we were put into an emergency children's home. Over the course of the month, I battled St. Francis in court and won. I was returned home, and my siblings did not. They are a short distance from me, and I can still see them. However, St. Francis has learned not to screw over a kid that will fight to the bitter end if you put a knife in his back.
Great example, I am 16 too... this sounds like a story straight up from a movie
I’ll adopt you
@sc1338 I'm okay man 😂
So sorry this happened. St Francis would be rolling over in his grave they used his name for such evil. His life was serving and helping.
A lesson I learned: everyone has things one might call "a figure of speech". For example, if someone asks you a question you could preface your answer with "well to be honest, Yada Yada Yada"
I did this during a hearing and the judge, kind of laughing says "you do realize by saying that you could be implying that other questions you answered dishonestly, right?"
Oops...
They just make you sit for long time, it's like a mental torture and they expect you to behave correctly for the sake of so called "justice" while the one who did it might be just sitting and enjoying listening to it.
@Mother Cheese the problem was, he was hearing my disability appeal. At the time I felt like not antagonizing him was probably the prudent course.
But, he denied my appeal, using reasons that stretched the bounds of common sense. So in hindsight, I had nothing to gain by being polite.
Funny postscript. well funny to me at least. After I got the denial I wrote him a letter. See, it wasn't the pittance of a monthly check I wanted. I needed the health insurance because without some specialists to curtail my condition, I was fucked. The idea of only having a short time when you're 90 is one thing, when you're 30 it's quite another. I had the good sense, or a moment of clarity, not to send it and after my next appeal, and 5 years total, I finally got it approved.
The letter started "Dear Cock sucker..."
It went downhill from there. Rapidly.
It's too bad, of everything I've written, it's among my best work lol
@@Damocles54 lmao you shouldn't have written the letter like that as it can very well frame negative image but I wasn't in your situation so idk if my reaction would've been same. Still good that you got what you deserved 👏
@Mother Cheese yeah in the end several things just fell into place.
A woman who loved me, a lawyer with balls, a judge with a brain, and a neurosurgeon with a semi- experimental surgery. I'm now older than i likely would have been had i just given up after that "judge" denied my claim. It's not an ideal life, but it's better than it was and way better than it was going to be.
Overall, while i could complain, i try not to. Because that is a quick way to talk yourself into feeling worse. Take your wins where you find them, even if you've gotta search a bit.
@@i_never_had_a_burger “torcher”
Problem for #2 is that I, like a lot of neurodivergent people, tend to settle on a way of responding to a question or describing something and recite it verbatim.
As a fellow neurodivergent I would absolutely struggle with that one tol
Yeah, I'm autistic and it can take me forever to answer a question, especially if there's any ambiguity in it.
The justice system is so f'dup the verdict often end up like this: "but excuse me your honour, that person is weird so they must have done it."
Maybe put out all your cards on the table and just say that you have ADHD or you’re autistic so it could be difficult to fully articulate what you mean
@@grandsome1 Which is fucked up because a big neurodivergent trait seen in both autism and adhd is a strong sense of justice.
Well, if I said "it depends on the fire" I'd get called a smart ass and be held in contempt. 💀
“However,if you’re dog ever stepped on a bee,you should remember that for the next time you ever step in the courtroom”
Don't forget the fact that they speak to you using Legalese.
So learn legalese? 🤔
the first one is the literal embodiment of twitter.
Nawh bro really recorded everything what he said.. He's definitely spying on him..💀
What does this mean
@@gracenantaya8394 that he was spying on him
Bro this is my second time seeing your comment and I'm less successful even though O have videos an make comment they never get popular
Though I guess it takes a while
He said we heard him
I rehearse regular conversations, I’m screwed.
Hands down the coolest lawyer in the world. And god dang can you pull off a suit and tie
This is the issue with the penal and court system in the US. It looks at all these technicalities that don't matter, instead of looking at basic fact and common sense which usually fucks over the wrong person. Such as my mother who got arrested for trying to look at my stepfather's phone even though she was beaten by him 😐
Your honor, if you are what you eat, then my client is an innocent man
Does that make me a 2009 Toyota corrola?
I was told by my lawyer to only tell people what they need to know and never apologize for anything. Apologizing admits guilt and determining guilt is the judges lawyers and jurors.
My answers were yes and no unless they asked me to elaborate on the yes or no and I let the lawyer talk for me when I could.
I was in court for healthcare trying to get a corporation to allow me to use their product. It was dumb. I'm not a criminal
You're lucky you didn't get asked a question where yes or no isn't sufficient to tell the "whole truth."
I love elaborating to exhaustion so that there's no misunderstanding with what I'm saying. That sounds like a nightmare.
Call the judge “Bro” to insert your dominance.
They'll twist your words like you're a celebrity on Twitter they don't like
That's why I would never have my mother testify in my defense. The prosecution would rip her to shreds.
Actually for the third tip, (at least in Canada this is) they will always have at least 1 person at all times making sure that the jury isn't influenced by something outside the courtroom, and can get a new jury if that is the case.
I was thinking that'd be the case in the US too.
On the other hand, publicly made statements outside of court during a trial can still be entered into evidence.
@@CouchPotator I guess the evidence part is true here too. However, the entire discussion in the third tip is completely unrealistic and would never actually happen in court.
That is a hearsay rule and basically a out of court statement made for the assertion of the facts at hand and a lot of things are hearsay but their often hearsay exemptions an exemption might be granted it seems for more general advice don’t talk period about your case if you don’t have reasonable expectation of privacy and the outside of a courtroom isn’t private
I love how mad that cat looks like
It's ears are nubs
“Don’t exaggerate”
Literally 5 seconds later used an exaggerated response to a response as an example
“Wouldn’t you agree that starting fires is wrong?” Depends, is the fire very obviously controlled. Because if a fire is started with no intention to be controlled, then yes, it is wrong
It depends, Mike, it always depends.
so courts are just "ha i got ya" instead of finding the truth
Courts are not the police force, they don’t find out the truth, they discuss it. A lot of cases have more than one POVs and no conclusive evidence.
No you aren’t really thinking how these factor in to the cases basically for the first tip don’t be certain on anything cause it can get twisted second tip you practice your testimony it might sound robotic and stuff the lawyers may want you to say third don’t discuss your case without a reasonable expectation of privacy
And this comment is stupid this is a TH-cam short not an in-depth look at the legal system
More like the prosecution, the opposing lawyers. The judge should be fairer
Amber's Lawyers taking down notes
That combover is almost johnny bravo level
Pretty sure thats not a combover. But im pretty sure hes had a hair transplant
@@TheLastApostle it’s a combover hair style. I didn’t say he was bald and I don’t care if he’s had a hair transplant.
Crazy how his twin brother in the jury just snitched on him like that
As a introvert with social anxiety adhd I fear these situations where people anilise every single word you say and one misspoke word because u thought the wrong definition could land u in jail even when your innocent
Deadass-
The first example with the fire actually got me so fucked up
Analyze*
You're*
You* (twice)
"Introvert" "adhd" "social anxiety" aren't new problems and people have dealt with them earlier. It's more like your problem that you're lazy to fix if you come with that type of attitude in court.
Ya know...wish these rules had applied during the custody battle for my twins...
My ex's lawyer is still practicing law, after making bold faced lies about me, lies that would be considered Slander in a sane world.
That’s terrible I hope you and your children are doing well ❤
if it's not too late you could consider suing them for malpractice but be aware that you should figure out a really good case first before pursuing action
@@Templarfreak Oh, i did sue, and her firm backed her, so it was my 'bottom of the barrel' lawyer, against a lawfirm, headed by a former judge for the same county.
@@dreamwolf7302 rip. cockroaches are often never alone i suppose
That's why you gotta say things like, "I believe setting fires for the purpose of harming others or damaging property is wrong."
"we're way beyond ointment now" i spit out my coffee 🤣🤣
"we're way beyond ointment now" absolute gold
In #3, if the jury heard the defendant's incriminating remarks but they weren't introduced as evidence, they can't take it to account right?
Having been a juror this sounds accurate to me, like, you WILL lose because the jury will care, but it sounds like grounds to get the conviction thrown out or appealed or whatever, since the judge tells you you absolutely cannot consider anything not in evidence, such as something you saw on the news, something you googled, etc.
@@dgpsfthey cannot use it as evidence at all, and it will never be considered in the outcome. Unless of course he processed it.
I think this is assuming that hearsay rule has been exempt
As a self made hypocrite, I prefer yo just stay away from court…May God be with the Court room that makes me report to jury duty bc I can’t make a decision, constantly flip flop, and get easily distracted when the topic bores me…
It’s kinda like, “I’m sorry Sir, I was listening but just to triple check what you said, can repeat that one more time?”
Meanwhile the judge is trying to tell me to stop talking over other people and to sit quietly and don’t talk about the case outside of work when I’m extroverted and share everything like an open book just like my feelings
this first example felt like a better call saul episode
in a good way? 👀
@@LawByMikeyes most definitely
Because I have mock trial tomorrow I really appreciate this
Your guilty until you proven your innocence. You forget to tell people that.. it's up to you to plea your innocence
It's the complete opposite, you're innocent until proven guilty. Even if you do nothing at all, you can still be found innocent if they don't have enough evidence to convict you.
“over generalizing can cause problems”
Let’s all get together and tell that to the people who over-generalize age groups and “gEnErAtiONs” lmao
Bro got violated 💀
It’s like rule #1 to not let the defendant take the stand. Too many bad things can happen.
just say "I invoke the fifth." and you're fine.
This is the most iconic channel
Lawyers telling you how to lawyer without a Lawyer 😮
Judge : you are proven guilt-
*I Invoke the fifth*
Objection, your honor. The robot was using Wikipedia as its source
Even the cat was angry with his response
I love how the judge is soooo fed up
I love the part where he says "it's invokin' time" and invoked the 5th all over the place
"My dog stepped on a bee"
*"OVERRULED"*
"Memorized testimony" can sometimes be useful at a bench trial, if for no other reason than to remind the judge what the law actually says. I definitely got out of a ticket by telling the judge that the cop's dashcam footage clearly shows that I was driving "at a reasonable and prudent speed given the conditions," and that I only sped up or slowed down "as necessary to avoid colliding with other vehicles." He agreed, wondered out loud why the cop would single ME out to pull over, and dismissed the citation.
Even the cat looked disappointed
Thank you. WIll use this next time I go on trial for vehicular manslaughter.
Bro you're the best lawyer in the world
We makin it out of court with this one🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
The first one should honestly be illegal for the lawyer to pull.
You can make an *_Objection_* over the *_relevance._* Any objection that you make will preserve the issue for Appeal. However, there still might be _SOME_ issues that you can have an Appellate Court review w/o an objection at trial: That would be (1) incompetent council and (2) jurisdiction (which can be challenged at any time).
You'll also probably have to make an *_Objection: Assumes Facts Not in Evidence:_* as you definitely don't want to let the prosecution get away with that one !!! And finally, if you're being railroaded in a *_Kangaroo Court_* then in some jurisdictions, you have to verbally state your intention to Appeal !!! But honestly, these bozos are so predictable that you should have to your Appeal(s) prepared before you even get to trial !!! ...That way you're making sure that you're in compliance with local rules.
It's a matter of credibility... some people do intentionally exaggerate to make it look like someone else is at fault. And it's important to question that in a fair trial.
“Oh yeah, the rash is spreading” 😂
Lawyer: "Wouldn't you agree that starting fires is wrong?"
Me: "That question is too vague to answer."
respect those free solid advices THANKS MIKE
"We're way beyond ointment now" 💀
Bro turned into a robot 💀
“The rash is spreading big time” 😂
Lawyers teaching us how to be more efficient criminals everyday.
# 235: Don't run into the courtroom with a gun screaming.. "I'M INNOCENT!!!!"
I sound like a robot in normal conversations... I'd be fucked in court.
“We’re way beyond ointment now” 💀
Damn this is a great short on how broken the justice system is if these are things you need to know
"'No, no, no, we're way beyond ointment now. I think I might need a-'"
"Can I just confess?"
Thanks for this, Mike!
I’m sure everyone wants Mike as our lawyer
That cat was mad 😂
Never ask the Judge " Where are the Kangaroos"
That Dr Newport one had me rolling 😂😂😂
Hey I'm not on trial here and those kittens were already frozen before I got there!
Judge "take him away."
Court officer "Do I have to? I don't want that rash."
Also a really good one is don't threat the courthouse with a bomb threat
"Starting a campfire to save freezing kittens is wrong to you?" "Yes 🗿"
That cat is gonna hire a Hitman to get rid of that man.
The cat really said: “😾”
Number 5: Better call Saul.
We want more Gwen in LawByMike videos!
LawbyMike is the best TH-camr ever for criminals
that last example is a real easy way for a jury to get a case thrown out lol
bro thinks he is Saul Goodman 💀
Ahh man, that last part was great. I needed a good 😂 laugh
The defendant and his lawyer in the hallway:yo do you wanna have a cheeseburger?
Judge:guilty send him away for life
That cat did NOT WANT TO BE THERE 💀💀
Most importantly don't ever let your opposition slander you without calling it out
"Always know the answer to your question before you ask".
Thank you for this insightful advice
“the rash is spreading big time” 💀💀💀
That ending hahaha💀
"Don't exaggerate"
Chuck McGill : _"I A M N O T C R A Z Y ! ! !"_
Bro committed arson so save kittens 💀