Love my Triumph. Fantastic watch. When I first saw the pictures of this release I wasn’t impressed. After watching your video I’m starting to like it, a lot.
The previous version still looks better to me. This lost a lot of the Skyquest's distinction. Looks and feels a bit more generic... Idk, something I've seen before from elsewhere. I get maybe they were trying to go for a sportier bolder look. But, I think the index and especially the numbers on the bezel are too big. And, the bezel is thicker/wider and that's why I prefer the older version. Appears more crowded on the dial and lost that cool bent GMT hand. Sort of makes me wish I had kept the order for very limited opaline white dial V1 GMT they sold out at the start of the SF Wind-Up. Oh, well...
@Alejandro Van Juevos exactly what it means. To clarify, I actually was one of the few that was able to secure a pre-order on that particular limited edition Monta.. the last Skyquest before the change with the white opaline dial. I thought about it and decided at the time I'd prefer to spend about as much $$ on another watch instead. So, I cancelled my pre-order, freed up my spot, so somebody else would be lucky enough to get one that really wanted one.
@@JohnConnor636 that's my point. Insane that they went with aluminium on this. Monta is really sensible on everything else they do, but aluminium at this price point for a sports watch is crazy to me, especially from a microbrand which who knows if they'll be around in a few years.
Nice video. I love the legibility on this new version. I thought I liked the Formex Reef GMT at this price point, but this Monta looks more grown up and elegant in my view.
Never heard of this watch brand before but I really like the look of this watch. My only disappointment was going to their website and finding out the bezel is blue and red. For some reason my computer monitor shows the bezel in your video as black and burgundy red. I like this combination better than the real colours.
I prefer the old one. Something about the THICC bezel on this just makes the design look unbalanced and less refined. I wish I'd been able to get one of the opaline gilt previous gens. :(
That’s a cool new model but I think they could have kept booth models by extending the SKYQUEST line or create a new one (maybe retract the gmt function of the VI). I found that the Atlas and Noble families complement each other really well and Monta had the opportunity to do the same with their sportier line.
Don’t buy into the hype and don’t waste your money. Purchased the gilt Pepsi and the first one I received had scuffs and dirt on the interior of the watch box, had a faulty crown that wouldn’t engage and the whole dial moved when pulling out the crown. I gave them the benefit of the doubt and asked for a replacement to be sent. The second one had a noisy rotor that could be heard and felt and ran at -20 sec / day. They did ultimately give me a refund but there response was a bit backhanded as they basically said “I’m sorry that you’re sorry” instead of owning their mistakes. They also failed to publish my two star review on their website. Engaging in review censorship is unacceptable.They should stick to make watch straps for other watch brands that actually know how to make watches.
Wow, some people really don't like change 😂 I think this more muscular design is WAY better than the v1...so much so that I'm saving up for one myself! The v1 seemed a little too dressy in the dial/bezel area for my tastes...which clashed with its sporty style case and bracelet.
@@RandomRobReviews As I've always understood it, "screw pins" are pins with fake screw heads on them that simply slot into collars like any other pin. Used in many low end, and some higher end watches. Screws on the other hand...well, you know what they are.
I have a hard time calling brands like Monta or Christopher Ward a microbrand anymore. I just do not know where the dividing line is. My view originally was if a brand farms out manufacturing, then they are a microbrand...but is Apple a microbrand for having Foxcon build the Apple watch? I do not know what Monta does for manufacturing but for this level of quality they have to have a hand in the process; even if they contract it out. At what level do these brands have to get to get on the lever of a independent watch makers like an Oris? In my mind you have 4 levels of watch making (5 if you include photo copy manufacturers like Pagani Design): 1. Microbrands: Borealis, Helm, Lorier, Baltic, Zelos, ect. 2. Independents: Oris, Sinn, etc. 3. Major Brand/Groups: Rolex, Tag Heuer, Seiko, Casio, Swatch Group brands, etc. 4. High Horology: I am too poor to know these brands off the top of my head but I guarantee they make hand built sold gold tourbillions that cost more then my house 🙂. In my imagination, people that buy at this level probably have a Patek as a beater 😛. Is this more of a feeling then a hard line. I am not even sure what the division markers should be. Is it sales; production volume; quality of manufacturing, distribution; production method; or a combination of all of them? Who knows? Just something to think about.
I do not like the new indicies. I loved the dimensionality of the old dial and the bent GMT hand was so damn cool. I think I'm going to be in the market for a used Skyquest...if I can find one. I have a Noble and it is awesome. Monta usually hits way above is weight class.
I mentioned this in Monta's comments too, but I agree with some of the other commenters. I find the bezel numbers too big. I lament the loss of the ceramic, but from their IG Live, it seems they have to do aluminum with the way they are doing the bezel mechanics. That has me concerned the new OceanKing will have an aluminum bezel too. I prefer the older ceramic/numbers bezel and the bent GMT hand. Apparently the bent hand was a solution to a problem that no longer exists with the updates/new movement, but it still was a unique feature I liked. Everything else seems more refined, but it seems a bit more generic now if that makes sense. I'm really glad they got that newer SW300-2 in there. As prices go up, I find it harder to pay for a movement with power reserves from the 1980s. If I can get at least 2 full days without issue, that helps me a lot. I have started being annoyed with my lower power reserve watches and having to reset them when I want to wear them.
You made me curious so I went to check out the video. Regarding the bezel, again, we have X patents on it, it's sooooo complicated, ceramic wouldn't have worked, colours are so difficult wouldn't have worked (yeah right, so advanced that it's a 60 click bezel on a 24h gmt, not 24 not 48 click) aaaaand the people didn't complain when we had aluminum on the limited edition so why not. Bent GMT hand and indices, nah, too extreme and not needed anymore(aka expensive) even though it was a stand out. Third gmt time zone on chapter ring, too difficult for the average joe to understand and use so we got rid of it (yeah cuz the average Joe will be dead set on buying a monta). Pretty sure at this stage that the cost cutting will be carried over to the ocean King as well
Let's just be honest, Rob. The "new look" is just to save money in production. It has lost its identity and it's just unfortunate. I also sense a price increase coming which would just make it more unfortunate...
I love Monta leaning into the sporty aspects of this design. Removing the 24 hour rehaut, more simplified indicies, and an overall cleaner design. For my taste, they nailed this. Gonna be a hard decision between this and the new oceanking
@@MJ-we5if I definitely prefer to have a date but I am holding out for the Oceanking as well. Im sure the coke bezel will make its way into my collection but I need a pure diver first then I can look at a GMT to round out a nice 3 watch collection.
Just my opinion, the previous Skyquest was way better looking... I think Monta should maintain the last design, this one lacks the "finesse" the other one had... again, just an opinion but i think its a very popular opinion..
It just doesn't feel very Monta to me. Not having a secondary 24hr scale on the rehaut feels like such a huge mistake to me, I thought the old indices were more attractive, and not having the raised GMT hand feels like a huge design misstep. It was so signature to Monta and the Skyquest. Now, it's just the same setup as a Rolex, and it has nothing, other than the dimensions, that separate it from the Tudor BB Gmt, which comes with a ton more pedigree. I'm left feeling meh, and "why would I buy this?"
As most sentiments go, the OG, esp. gilt, is more unique and looks better - cooler hands, engraved bezel, etc. The only thing preventing me from getting the OG is the long lug-to-lug. Now there's not a sliver of consideration for this new generic one or their other new models. The minimalistic design direction Monta is going is worrying.
Meh.... still too expensive. It's $2,900 Canadian plus $50 shipping and 18% import duties to Ontario Canada. The Longines Zulu GMT is a only $3,500 plus 13% tax Canadian and it's a true GMT! And the Longines is a way better watch for that $500 dollar difference!!
Cheaper looking dial, cheaper looking watch with cheaper materials and less functionality than the previous model, meh, a step backwards in my opinion. Maybe on the next model they can move back to plexiglass and say something like "our new proprietary plexiglass (patent pending) gives a much warmer and more vintage diffusion of light". Curious what this release will do to the price of the previous model
Nope, dont like, also didnt like they way that the CEOs trying to create a 'hype' for it saying they can only get 320 movements so there will be 'limited' stock.., load of bull to me
I mean, only 320 for now. It will be a staple in the collection for years to come. So theres really no rush to buy now unless you want the preorder price
It looks awful. It’s so dull, so generic in every way, and the only thing that’s not dull (the bezel insert) it’s also the ugliest thing about it. It honestly like a plain Orient Kamasu GMT, just uglier and worse proportioned. It looks like something those uninspired micro-brands would design. You have to be nuts to get this watch.
That touch of gilt is outstanding.
That is such a cool bezel insert.
I ordered one in the Coke variety. I like the classic look of this. Thanks for the video.
Love my Triumph. Fantastic watch. When I first saw the pictures of this release I wasn’t impressed. After watching your video I’m starting to like it, a lot.
Excellent and beautiful watch
That looks fantastic. Love it 😍
The previous version still looks better to me. This lost a lot of the Skyquest's distinction. Looks and feels a bit more generic... Idk, something I've seen before from elsewhere. I get maybe they were trying to go for a sportier bolder look. But, I think the index and especially the numbers on the bezel are too big. And, the bezel is thicker/wider and that's why I prefer the older version. Appears more crowded on the dial and lost that cool bent GMT hand. Sort of makes me wish I had kept the order for very limited opaline white dial V1 GMT they sold out at the start of the SF Wind-Up. Oh, well...
agree it looks "too much" now with the larger numbers etc... would of pre-ordered otherwise.
heard multiple people describe it as seiko monsterish
Couldn’t disagree more.
Missed out on the white dial. It's truly amazing
@Alejandro Van Juevos exactly what it means. To clarify, I actually was one of the few that was able to secure a pre-order on that particular limited edition Monta.. the last Skyquest before the change with the white opaline dial. I thought about it and decided at the time I'd prefer to spend about as much $$ on another watch instead. So, I cancelled my pre-order, freed up my spot, so somebody else would be lucky enough to get one that really wanted one.
The bezel colours are beautiful 😍
Very nice watch. Love the gold accents. Bracelet looks really solid.
Previous one was much more interesting. This is "just" a great watch.
Love this one - I’m going to be unwrapping the red and black version in two days!
How is it?
@@JohnConnor636 It’s awesome. One of my favorite watches. Really close to Tudor quality.
No concerns over that aluminium bezel? That's the one thing stopping me from buying the watch...
@@LittleBigPoet 2,400 with a watch with an aluminum bezel. I can't justify
@@JohnConnor636 that's my point. Insane that they went with aluminium on this. Monta is really sensible on everything else they do, but aluminium at this price point for a sports watch is crazy to me, especially from a microbrand which who knows if they'll be around in a few years.
That aluminum bezel is beautiful. I like the muted metal look instead of the shiny ceramic.
That same look can be accomplished on a ceramic bezel as well. For durability purposes, I think ceramic is a better option.
Nice video. I love the legibility on this new version. I thought I liked the Formex Reef GMT at this price point, but this Monta looks more grown up and elegant in my view.
Definitely my next watch, absolutely stunning!
I still prefer the V1, was a more unique design. I'm sure the quality is still there but wish I had picked up the other one
Never heard of this watch brand before but I really like the look of this watch. My only disappointment was going to their website and finding out the bezel is blue and red. For some reason my computer monitor shows the bezel in your video as black and burgundy red. I like this combination better than the real colours.
They have both Coke and Pepsi, though only the Pepsi has the Gilt dial markers. The Black and red looks classic to me!
they do have a black and red bezel for preorder still
Time to calibrate your monitor 😅
The dial reminds me of the Orient Kamasu :) Really like where Monta is going but I would buy the V1 over this.
I havethe Orient Kamasu. You gotta get this one in hand because it's not even close lmao the attention to detail is insane
This is a nice watch for sure. I wish they would have kept the 24 hour scale on the chapter ring.
Yeah, I don't understand taking that away. What's the point of a rotating bezel without a 24hr chapter ring?
The opaline was a killer color. The curve on the clasp makes a huge difference.
I prefer the old one. Something about the THICC bezel on this just makes the design look unbalanced and less refined. I wish I'd been able to get one of the opaline gilt previous gens. :(
What’s the face/dial size? That dimension would be helpful for us larger wrist guys trying to go smaller
That’s a cool new model but I think they could have kept booth models by extending the SKYQUEST line or create a new one (maybe retract the gmt function of the VI). I found that the Atlas and Noble families complement each other really well and Monta had the opportunity to do the same with their sportier line.
Love the all black model!!!!
Monta punches well above their weight. And, are masters when they make their bracelets.
That's a good looking watch. I'm very curious about the new Oceanking design
Don’t buy into the hype and don’t waste your money. Purchased the gilt Pepsi and the first one I received had scuffs and dirt on the interior of the watch box, had a faulty crown that wouldn’t engage and the whole dial moved when pulling out the crown. I gave them the benefit of the doubt and asked for a replacement to be sent. The second one had a noisy rotor that could be heard and felt and ran at -20 sec / day. They did ultimately give me a refund but there response was a bit backhanded as they basically said “I’m sorry that you’re sorry” instead of owning their mistakes. They also failed to publish my two star review on their website. Engaging in review censorship is unacceptable.They should stick to make watch straps for other watch brands that actually know how to make watches.
Wow, some people really don't like change 😂
I think this more muscular design is WAY better than the v1...so much so that I'm saving up for one myself!
The v1 seemed a little too dressy in the dial/bezel area for my tastes...which clashed with its sporty style case and bracelet.
Much prefer the v1, far more classy and interesting design. This looks like a slightly off first gen Ali express homage to their original design.
I'd love to get this with the white dial.
This Review was done in a such 'im bored of this' way 🥴 Like ur other Reviews much more, have a great weekend
Is the bracelet attached with "screw pins" as you say or actual screws?
What’s the difference?
@@RandomRobReviews As I've always understood it, "screw pins" are pins with fake screw heads on them that simply slot into collars like any other pin. Used in many low end, and some higher end watches. Screws on the other hand...well, you know what they are.
@@chrishennemeyer7276 screws
I have a hard time calling brands like Monta or Christopher Ward a microbrand anymore. I just do not know where the dividing line is. My view originally was if a brand farms out manufacturing, then they are a microbrand...but is Apple a microbrand for having Foxcon build the Apple watch? I do not know what Monta does for manufacturing but for this level of quality they have to have a hand in the process; even if they contract it out. At what level do these brands have to get to get on the lever of a independent watch makers like an Oris?
In my mind you have 4 levels of watch making (5 if you include photo copy manufacturers like Pagani Design):
1. Microbrands: Borealis, Helm, Lorier, Baltic, Zelos, ect.
2. Independents: Oris, Sinn, etc.
3. Major Brand/Groups: Rolex, Tag Heuer, Seiko, Casio, Swatch Group brands, etc.
4. High Horology: I am too poor to know these brands off the top of my head but I guarantee they make hand built sold gold tourbillions that cost more then my house 🙂. In my imagination, people that buy at this level probably have a Patek as a beater 😛.
Is this more of a feeling then a hard line. I am not even sure what the division markers should be. Is it sales; production volume; quality of manufacturing, distribution; production method; or a combination of all of them? Who knows? Just something to think about.
Thanks Rob 🙏
It’s a beautiful watch but isn’t it just an “office” gmt? Is it not possible to have a true gmt at this price point?
Thanks for the review! How do you think it would wear on a 6.5" wrist?
Watch good, not sure in the clasp.
@@RandomRobReviews which would you choose between this Monta and the Tag Heuer Aquaracer GMT? Similar price point and case shape.
Would it look good on 6"25 iinch wrist?
Most of their wristshots on IG are on a 6.5" wrist
The case looks very similar to the tag heuer aquaracer case - 41mm diameter with a very short lug to lug.
I do not like the new indicies. I loved the dimensionality of the old dial and the bent GMT hand was so damn cool. I think I'm going to be in the market for a used Skyquest...if I can find one.
I have a Noble and it is awesome. Monta usually hits way above is weight class.
White please! I'd buy that...
Yes
I mentioned this in Monta's comments too, but I agree with some of the other commenters. I find the bezel numbers too big. I lament the loss of the ceramic, but from their IG Live, it seems they have to do aluminum with the way they are doing the bezel mechanics. That has me concerned the new OceanKing will have an aluminum bezel too. I prefer the older ceramic/numbers bezel and the bent GMT hand. Apparently the bent hand was a solution to a problem that no longer exists with the updates/new movement, but it still was a unique feature I liked. Everything else seems more refined, but it seems a bit more generic now if that makes sense. I'm really glad they got that newer SW300-2 in there. As prices go up, I find it harder to pay for a movement with power reserves from the 1980s. If I can get at least 2 full days without issue, that helps me a lot. I have started being annoyed with my lower power reserve watches and having to reset them when I want to wear them.
You made me curious so I went to check out the video. Regarding the bezel, again, we have X patents on it, it's sooooo complicated, ceramic wouldn't have worked, colours are so difficult wouldn't have worked (yeah right, so advanced that it's a 60 click bezel on a 24h gmt, not 24 not 48 click) aaaaand the people didn't complain when we had aluminum on the limited edition so why not. Bent GMT hand and indices, nah, too extreme and not needed anymore(aka expensive) even though it was a stand out. Third gmt time zone on chapter ring, too difficult for the average joe to understand and use so we got rid of it (yeah cuz the average Joe will be dead set on buying a monta). Pretty sure at this stage that the cost cutting will be carried over to the ocean King as well
I prefer this version to the original but I wish it had a proper lume pip!
Can you imagine this watch with a jubilee style bracelet?
I much prefer the look on this updated model.
Let's just be honest, Rob. The "new look" is just to save money in production.
It has lost its identity and it's just unfortunate. I also sense a price increase coming which would just make it more unfortunate...
Ding ding ding ding ✨️ we have a winner
I love Monta leaning into the sporty aspects of this design. Removing the 24 hour rehaut, more simplified indicies, and an overall cleaner design. For my taste, they nailed this. Gonna be a hard decision between this and the new oceanking
I think if the design language is the same, an Oceanking no date wins with me.
@@MJ-we5if I definitely prefer to have a date but I am holding out for the Oceanking as well. Im sure the coke bezel will make its way into my collection but I need a pure diver first then I can look at a GMT to round out a nice 3 watch collection.
I don't like the new dial. It looks far more crude and crowded than the old one.
The first iteration was more original, this looks more "generic"
WIsh it was a true gmt
Meh the older dial was better
agreed
I do love the look of this watch, but it ends up being close to £2.5k after import tax to the UK which is simply too much for a microbrand.
I think it looks great. I bought one as soon as it was available. The only thing I wish they kept was the inner beveled lugs.
Bezel to dial ratio is off.
I like the bent GMT hand, even though I don't really like GMTs in general. If I was to get another watch a Monta would be tits.
Laik Rob
Just my opinion, the previous Skyquest was way better looking... I think Monta should maintain the last design, this one lacks the "finesse" the other one had... again, just an opinion but i think its a very popular opinion..
👀
It just doesn't feel very Monta to me. Not having a secondary 24hr scale on the rehaut feels like such a huge mistake to me, I thought the old indices were more attractive, and not having the raised GMT hand feels like a huge design misstep. It was so signature to Monta and the Skyquest. Now, it's just the same setup as a Rolex, and it has nothing, other than the dimensions, that separate it from the Tudor BB Gmt, which comes with a ton more pedigree. I'm left feeling meh, and "why would I buy this?"
As most sentiments go, the OG, esp. gilt, is more unique and looks better - cooler hands, engraved bezel, etc. The only thing preventing me from getting the OG is the long lug-to-lug. Now there's not a sliver of consideration for this new generic one or their other new models. The minimalistic design direction Monta is going is worrying.
Meh.... still too expensive. It's $2,900 Canadian plus $50 shipping and 18% import duties to Ontario Canada. The Longines Zulu GMT is a only $3,500 plus 13% tax Canadian and it's a true GMT! And the Longines is a way better watch for that $500 dollar difference!!
Way better?? Not sure about that
Have you seen both in person?
Why is Longines better. I think you may be mistaken.
It looks a lot better than the V1 in my opinion.
Wish it was sold from within the EU
It seems like Ginault quality at twice the price.
Don't like the big numerals on the bezel. Totally out of proportions.
Cheaper looking dial, cheaper looking watch with cheaper materials and less functionality than the previous model, meh, a step backwards in my opinion. Maybe on the next model they can move back to plexiglass and say something like "our new proprietary plexiglass (patent pending) gives a much warmer and more vintage diffusion of light". Curious what this release will do to the price of the previous model
Nope, dont like, also didnt like they way that the CEOs trying to create a 'hype' for it saying they can only get 320 movements so there will be 'limited' stock.., load of bull to me
I mean, only 320 for now. It will be a staple in the collection for years to come. So theres really no rush to buy now unless you want the preorder price
Meh
It looks awful. It’s so dull, so generic in every way, and the only thing that’s not dull (the bezel insert) it’s also the ugliest thing about it. It honestly like a plain Orient Kamasu GMT, just uglier and worse proportioned. It looks like something those uninspired micro-brands would design. You have to be nuts to get this watch.