Sky Strikers Post Banlist!? Andres Torres vs Khalil | Yu-Gi-Oh Local Finals

#Yugioh #yugiohtcg #skystriker
Join the first ever Wholesale & Investments Patreon!
► / ppginvestments
To support us, just click here when you start shopping TCGPlayer!
►bit.ly/ygowildset
Join the official PPG Organized Play Discord!
► / discord
Use the code PPG for 30% off the best but affordable gaming chair.
►bit.ly/32wDI0i
Use the code PROPLAY10YP for 10% off on quality custom playmats and sleeves.
►bit.ly/35rSyps
Check out our upcoming events coming to a city near you!
►PPGeventmanage...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Be sure to check out Pro-Play Games for any cards you'll need for upcoming tournaments at competitive prices!
►www.Pro-PlayGam...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
↓↓↓↓FIND US ON ALL SOCIAL MEDIA HERE↓↓↓↓
►linktr.ee/proplaygames
Music by DayFox from Pixabay

[@deruneldembal5048]

Imperm isnt negating the column if it didnt neg the monster bro.

[@cartonbox17]

should still neg. ion see why not

[@friskydrinklunkybank1108]

@Johnatan Alfaro its because imperm is printed "negate its effects **then** negate the column if this card was set"
Its because of the then keyword. Imperm resolved without negating cartesia as she fused herself away out of the field on resolution, so the target is no longer present which then doesnt follow up with the column negation as it needs to negate first. The same also applies if you had another imperm set to negate cartesia responding to the first imperm targeting her. The first imperm that activate resolves without effect as you cannot negate a monsters effects whose effect is already negated. Similar to how widow anchor cannot target a monster whose effects are already negated

[@jstaarrzz]

A has to happen for b to resolve, come on pro play lol

[@xSkwintz]

Come on guys, he’s only been playing competitively for 6-7 years. Give him a break

[@WesleyParksTTV]

The best players know how to make their opponents misplay

[@EL_RAMBOx]

I'm glad to have back PPG yugioh content.

[@bigg_boss_rob]

Very good game footage. Only gripe would be game 3 that branded fusion took way too long to resolve imo. If they were playing with time that could be very triggering. Still dropped a like on the vid

[@nlm7033]

He really Ashed Fusion Deployment.

[@ConArroz9]

He opened 3 handtraps, he didn't need to ash fusion

[@petermagaro4714]

@@ConArroz9 he rly did tho tbh, not ashing branded fusion allows him to dump lubellion and make albion. this lets him get the graveyard effect of albion by tributing it to summon lubellion, which nets him so much advantage by adding or setting any branded spell via albion, and placing any branded card face up via lubellion. literally all of this could have been stopped by ashing branded fusion i have no idea why he didnt lmao.

[@mariosulvaran7975]

upload the deck list of Andres

[@Thatchh]

Really enjoyed the video and the voice over commentary

[@JCGRIPS]

Game 3 branded should of fused into rindbrumn, quem back the car, attack over. Car effect to dodge anything with rindbrumn gran send Albion set branded in red pass turn. The ad lib in grave as well. Why’d he use quem as material I have no clue

[@jackych3n]

This setup is awesome

[@user-tr9bj7ub1q]

fusion deployment reveal isnt cost wtf

[@NotSaadjan]

Bystial magnamhut cannot add in the end phase because it's banished face down so it isn't able to resolve the effect

[@constructshiny]

yes he can because the effect to search was activated in the main phase. in the end phase it only resolve

[@donaldbookhart9338]

Upload branded deck list

[@maximilianomadero4853]

hey if the player reveal the fusion with deployment to summon the spell cant be negated by ash

[@somelocalduellistza]

I’m pretty sure lost won’t apply with deployment as it’s not leading to a fusion summon.
For example, you can’t belle Branded In Red while lost is on the field as belle negates activation hence why Branded Fusion can be ashed while lost is up as ash negates effects

[@Brayan-nh4gx]

@@somelocalduellistza I think he means it’s not cost to reveal for deployment so if they let it get that far then they can’t choose to ash after seeing what was revealed

[@andrestorres902]

He was playing really fast also we are friends so we know what each other is doing

[@alecwilson8743]

@@somelocalduellistza you can belle branded in red under lost, belle just won't resolve. It's still legal to activate belle

[@bastilleday6783]

AT best Player in the World Miss you Homie
Pls do More Videos on TH-cam
Believe me u will Get so much Clicks

[@danistrife9836]

Upload andres Decklist please

[@Flapjack-vh6yc]

Was the imperm a legal play with lost on field with lubellions effect ? Unless I’m reading lost incorrectly he couldn’t have negated that effect

[@inkman2250]

You can still negate the effects of cards that fusion summon under lost, you just can't negate the activation of cards/effects that fusion summon, e.g. you can ash branded fusion under lost but you couldn't ghost belle branded in red because belle negates activations

[@fugfug2]

@@inkman2250he chained cartesia tho to dodge inperm he targeted cartesia . So it didn’t resolve so the column can’t be negated

[@inkman2250]

@@fugfug2 I know, but that wasn't the question I replied to 🤣
The commenter was asking if it was legal to activate imperm, I was letting them know it is legal to activate it

[@javomw2]

Im sorry but the branded player could have done a lot of better plays

[@privateduelistsclub]

How can we get the mat?

[@megaQaed]

Doble normal summon? In the last game

[@shuosterr]

Should’ve been Roze special on summon of hayate

[@KevinLopez-fm9kz]

Never ash deployment. Ever.

[@ManuelGarcia-fk8lh]

Terrible missplay at the end for branded player to sad

[@m31c31]

What could he do better?

[@marcelomunoz1543]

Lubellion in atack from BF , Quem change 1 target cartesia , tragedy change 2 aluber , andred imperanance in queem , normal aluber search branded in red , battle phase, branded in red , mirroajade 😂😂😂

[@alannavarroguzman8658]

Deck list ❤

[@butti0903]

Does someone have the decklists?

[@Pro-PlayGames]

Will be coming up in a future video!

[@butti0903]

@@Pro-PlayGames Nice! Thank you!🙏🏻

[@kennyjorgecoaquira8283]

Que bien Andres torres sigue jugando yugi

[@hypa_surge6226]

So sky striker won it?

[@friskydrinklunkybank1108]

Yes

[@sukeforth7043]

Of course it did. Best deck right now. (no bias here >>)

[@cristiangc28]

Juju a KONAMI no le gusta este video, ojalá no sancionen más a Andrés por estar jugando en torneos

[@franciscoleon4264]

¿Merecido tiene el castigo no? Uno no puede ser tan descarado y admitir engañar al oponente para que juegue de cierta manera y al final se de cuenta de que lo timaron.

[@ArchoYT]

​@@franciscoleon4264pues así es el juego, y no solo se engaña con tokens, se puede engañar de otras maneras no sé que tanto chillas

[@xSkwintz]

I stopped watching after mans wasted ash on fusion deployment

[@franciscoleon4264]

Que duelos más aburridos.

[@paschkey_9834]

This match was horrible

[@omfgusername002]

Andrea Torres cheating? Unheard of