Anyone watching this video who thinks anything that this man has just said is wrong does not understand FIBA basketball rules. This is a very good educational video.
Play at 2:54 is not a charge but rather a push. The foul type is “charging with the ball” but offence passes the ball before contact is made. Offensive push correct call.
If the defender is backing up when u dribble with your back to the basket, slowly getting forward, would it be a charging foul or would it not be called as the defender is moving
That is called a post play. There is going to be some resistance from both players (Defensive player trying to keep his position and offensive player trying to get closer to the basket) and as long as they are both resisting and respecting each others positions - then it shouldn't be any foul. However it is a foul by an offensive player or defensive player to shoulder or hip his opponent out of position.
If a defender has legal guarding position, he or she may move backwards or laterally while maintaining legal guarding position. A post offensive player may back his opponent down as long as they don't impede on their defender's ability to play defense (i.e. shoving them so that they fall or they are backed up too far)
FIBA set the rules, but almost every league around the world makes slight changes to suit their style. It makes it hard to referee games between multiple leagues
No expert myself but in the video it looks like the defender was moving into the attacker's current trajectory and is late (very important point); a legal movement would be legal containment instead of illegal body interception, or setting a charge beforehand. This scenario was mainly about who got there first.
Probably not a great reference anymore, unfortunately (despite being a well-put-together video). They still have the old-timey keyhole-shaped restricted area here without a no-charge semicircle, so I'd especially ignore anything close to the basket in this vid.
The first two were right calls , because the defenders were still in motion if the defenders had stopped and stabled themselves then it would have been a charge by the offensive player
White 8 (1:10 ) still in motion and haven’t took a standing defensive position and is still going back , ( 2:13 )look carefully at red 7’s feet they are still in motion going back with the incoming white 15 .
You don’t have to be not moving too take a charge. You can be moving and defending and still take the charge. That’s why there’s a difference between legal guarding positions and non legal.
@@asapmimic1289 i don't think you quite understand what you are saying.. for a legal guarding position, your feet are set, amd your shoulders are square. A tilt in the shoulders to follow the offensive players momentum nullifies the charge and makes it a blocking foul.. automatically.
@@bartpatton3409 no I understand what I’m saying. A legal guarding position must be established before contact. Once a legal guarding position is established the defensive player is allowed to move laterally or obliquely to maintain the guarding of the player. The defender no longer has to keep his hips or shoulders square to the dribbler once legal guarding position is established. The defender has as much of a right to his spot on the floor as the dribbler, so in order to identify a block or charge you must identify who had the right to that spot when contact occurs. Who moved into who to gain an advantage.
One of the biggest misconceptions among non-refs (and some who call themselves refs) is the idea that the defensive player is not allowed to move while defending. You don't have to stand still like a statue as a defender. smh, why do so many people think this is how it works?
I could only stand to watch the first few scenarios of this video. At least in the beginning the officials were CORRECT in their calls as the defenders did not have their feet set and are moving into the way of the offense as they drive
Waiitt a minute. If the purpose of defending & blocking is to impede your opponent's progress towards the ring, then why at 8:20 is called a foul. Damn man, those rules make basketball soft. Not good. Not good.
Fantastic vid, I struggle differentiating and this helps huge!!
What a very GREAT video, thanks a lot💪🏻🏀
The comments prove how many different opinions on refereeing there are
Anyone watching this video who thinks anything that this man has just said is wrong does not understand FIBA basketball rules. This is a very good educational video.
If anything, I think the play at 5:40 isn't a charge, but a push or illegal elbow. Still an offensive foul, but not really a charging call.
Play at 2:54 is not a charge but rather a push. The foul type is “charging with the ball” but offence passes the ball before contact is made. Offensive push correct call.
If the defender is backing up when u dribble with your back to the basket, slowly getting forward, would it be a charging foul or would it not be called as the defender is moving
That is called a post play. There is going to be some resistance from both players (Defensive player trying to keep his position and offensive player trying to get closer to the basket) and as long as they are both resisting and respecting each others positions - then it shouldn't be any foul. However it is a foul by an offensive player or defensive player to shoulder or hip his opponent out of position.
If a defender has legal guarding position, he or she may move backwards or laterally while maintaining legal guarding position. A post offensive player may back his opponent down as long as they don't impede on their defender's ability to play defense (i.e. shoving them so that they fall or they are backed up too far)
Discbands Alternate Possession Wristband is a new & helpful accessory for officials. Be professional. Be right.
First situation If it isn't clear that Red used the left arm to push White away, then it's a block.
nba rule and international rule are different?
FIBA set the rules, but almost every league around the world makes slight changes to suit their style. It makes it hard to referee games between multiple leagues
I have a question regarding the scene on 8:17. It should be legal defense, weren't it for the use of white's right forearm, wouldn't it?
If you look at his left knee, it is clearly outside of the defender's natural cylinder, so I don't blame the trail official for calling a block here.
contact occurs on right should, right arm and left arm, almost no contact on the torso => No legal defence
But today was different, cause nowadays have semi circle area..
12.09 how the **** is that a charge?? The defence moved in after take off. How can u expect someone to control himself post take off??
On 9:14, did the defender actually move towards to the offensive player? In my opinion, the defender moved laterally thus the movement was legal.
No expert myself but in the video it looks like the defender was moving into the attacker's current trajectory and is late (very important point); a legal movement would be legal containment instead of illegal body interception, or setting a charge beforehand. This scenario was mainly about who got there first.
This video helps a lot
Michael Ryan it’s a bad video
@@JasonBrand79 why?
😊
Can these still be applied in 2022 FIBA rules?
Probably not a great reference anymore, unfortunately (despite being a well-put-together video). They still have the old-timey keyhole-shaped restricted area here without a no-charge semicircle, so I'd especially ignore anything close to the basket in this vid.
The first two were right calls , because the defenders were still in motion if the defenders had stopped and stabled themselves then it would have been a charge by the offensive player
White 8 (1:10 ) still in motion and haven’t took a standing defensive position and is still going back , ( 2:13 )look carefully at red 7’s feet they are still in motion going back with the incoming white 15 .
You don’t have to be not moving too take a charge. You can be moving and defending and still take the charge. That’s why there’s a difference between legal guarding positions and non legal.
@@asapmimic1289 i don't think you quite understand what you are saying.. for a legal guarding position, your feet are set, amd your shoulders are square. A tilt in the shoulders to follow the offensive players momentum nullifies the charge and makes it a blocking foul.. automatically.
@@bartpatton3409 no I understand what I’m saying. A legal guarding position must be established before contact. Once a legal guarding position is established the defensive player is allowed to move laterally or obliquely to maintain the guarding of the player. The defender no longer has to keep his hips or shoulders square to the dribbler once legal guarding position is established. The defender has as much of a right to his spot on the floor as the dribbler, so in order to identify a block or charge you must identify who had the right to that spot when contact occurs. Who moved into who to gain an advantage.
One of the biggest misconceptions among non-refs (and some who call themselves refs) is the idea that the defensive player is not allowed to move while defending. You don't have to stand still like a statue as a defender. smh, why do so many people think this is how it works?
what is he calling restricted area?
90
I could only stand to watch the first few scenarios of this video. At least in the beginning the officials were CORRECT in their calls as the defenders did not have their feet set and are moving into the way of the offense as they drive
hang on like is there no restricted area?
Deyon Grant Back in 2004, there wasn't.
what I understood from the video - referees on olympic games are dorks )))))
Waiitt a minute. If the purpose of defending & blocking is to impede your opponent's progress towards the ring, then why at 8:20 is called a foul. Damn man, those rules make basketball soft. Not good. Not good.
Had to stop watchin this video after the first clip. Jus WRONG