Why No Standard Remote ID on ARFs?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 73

  • @toastrecon
    @toastrecon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for producing this. More clear information in a short video than I've heard in many others.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      TR: Glad it was helpful! Tim

  • @xjet
    @xjet 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Perhaps you should mention that pilots are required to make sure their RID module is operating correctly (ie: has a GPS fix and is broadcasting a valid signal) every time before they take off. To fly with RID module that isn't broadcasting a valid signal is a breach of the rule. I wonder how many people will actually check though -- especially if the module is inside the fuselage of a foam model where the LEDs can't actually be seen and when checking operation would actually require using the app on your phone to validate the signal.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I doubt anyone will check this detail. Folks still busy taking off with reversed controls, etc. 😖 Tim

    • @modquad18
      @modquad18 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mount the module so the LED can be seen, or punch/drill a small hole in the fuselage in line with the LED. Modeling 101, c’mon.

    • @xjet
      @xjet 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@modquad18 Which makes the job of moving your RID module from model to model even more annoying (having to make sure it's lined up with the view-hole). Also, how do you do this without butchering your lovely scale model by making holes in non-scale places or ruining the cockpit detail by stuffing a RID module in there? The bigger question is *why* is there a need to do this on a traditional, line-of-sight, fixed wing scale model aircraft? I don't hear of these models being used to annoy people, violate their privacy or menace airliners at airports -- do you?
      Regulatory over-reach at its worst. The truth is that this is just the next step in a plan designed to marginalize the hobby in favour of corporate interests that want the 0-400ft airspace all to themselves. Remember -- *YOU* can't fly a tiny foam plane BVLOS because it's not safe but Amazon and Wing will be flying much larger, heavier more dangerous craft BVLOS because they pay for that privilege. It's all about the money -- and those corporations don't want the hassle of having to deal with "inconvenient hobbyists" using *their* airspace.

  • @Daniel-vr4lv
    @Daniel-vr4lv 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    It's all about compliance, compliance, compliance. 1984 style compliance. The introduction of drones was the deathnell of this fine hobby,

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Should not have been much of a surprise to anyone. What could go wrong with thousands of drone pilots, with zero training flying around in the National Airspace System? Tim

  • @xjet
    @xjet 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I believe that part 107 operations, even when conducted in a FRIA, still require RID.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Correct. Tim

    • @russcole5685
      @russcole5685 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Surprised to see you here Bruce. LoL gidday from Palmerston North New Zealand

    • @xjet
      @xjet 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@russcole5685 Hi Russ, I'm everywhere mate 🙂

  • @ATINKERER
    @ATINKERER 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the very complete and easy to understand instructions on this new requirement.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @stevedessert5663
    @stevedessert5663 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks Tim. Appreciate your efforts.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching! Tim

  • @johnw5734
    @johnw5734 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I get a comforting feeling watching your videos. It gives me the confidence that I know what's expected of me as an RC pilot as far as FAA regulations are concerned.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      John: Many thanks! Tim

  • @wegder
    @wegder 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I hope flying clubs have a big comeback, I have visited flying clubs several times and it is an amazing experience.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Fully agree! Tim

    • @JDDupuy
      @JDDupuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Land usage is becoming a problem. One club was shut down after 20 years here cause the land was sold. Now another club is facing the lost of their site as the land has been set aside for a new school.

    • @gordonmckay4523
      @gordonmckay4523 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JDDupuy Yup. US population increased by around 80 million folks since 2000. They have to live and work somewhere. Sadly, there will be nothing but more pressure on a lot of RC clubs and their land. Tim

  • @rlbutterfield
    @rlbutterfield 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very good explanation, Tim. 👍🏻🙂

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad it was helpful! Tim

  • @Tammy-un3ql
    @Tammy-un3ql 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thank you

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're welcome

  • @scable-eq7bp
    @scable-eq7bp 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Our club in Florida has a very unique situation, we fly on an active military outpost. Our club is not an AMA charter even though most of the members are AMA members. Even though this field is miles away from the main base it's still activated even though no military aircraft have landed here in years, it's more of a reserve or emergency use runway. Because this is a restricted military airspace no commercial drones will ever fly through this airspace. Any rules and regulations set forth by the FAA are null and void in our situation. We do have to follow certain protocols when flying here, we have to contact the base to see if the airspace is not hot, no drones are allowed, only RC aircraft that are flown line of sight are allowed, no FPV is allowed. We must also monitor aircraft band scanners to see if any other aircraft are within the area. Civilian aircraft can pass through this airspace if it's hot but must maintain 1000 feet AGL. We are allowed to fly up to 600 AGL because we have a lot of glider pilots in the club. It's not the perfect situation, but it sure beats having to put up with the bullshit that the FAA is cramming down our throats pertaining to remote I.D......

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very interesting, thanks! Tim

  • @TedB1800
    @TedB1800 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks, Tim, for your comprehensive explanation of the differences between "standard" RID and "broadcast" RID. I now know what the term "basic" refers to. Yes, changing the broadcast module from one plane to another will be a pain. I have a few smaller planes where the installation of the module will probably affect the CG...we will have to see.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ted: Copy all! I think the RID modules are quite light. Tim

  • @joetheairbusguy1813
    @joetheairbusguy1813 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    FYI, I purchased a HS720G from holystone on Amazon. It exceeds the 250g limit. It is NOT equipped with a standard RID. I purchased a RID module from holystone, activated it and now I simply look for a flashing green light and a steady battery light. So holystone isn’t complying. $80. I registered it with the FAA and I believe I can use it on my entire fleet.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting update, thanks! Tim

  • @stevendegiorgio3143
    @stevendegiorgio3143 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That spectrum engineer is smart for doing that.Our hobby is hurting bad enough with everyday inflation.And he knows increasing the cost of model kits will further hurt scales.I knew this was coming and this is a wise decision by Horizon hobby to make.The planes can fly without remote ID installed.My V900 doesn't have it and it flys fine,becides,I have no plans of installing a remote ID system in that aircraft.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For what it is worth, if flying recreational and outside a FRIA, you need just one (1) RID for your entire fleet of models. Tim

  • @MrGaborseres
    @MrGaborseres 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Tim 👍

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👍🏻😊 Tim

  • @peterwoodward9834
    @peterwoodward9834 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good morning , I was wondering if anyone had received the remote ID module from Spektrum yet . I ordered a couple over 2 months ago and haven’t received none.

    • @rodgersrcaviation2785
      @rodgersrcaviation2785 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I haven’t seen mine I ordered it the day it was released for preorder

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I ordered mine on Aug 25, day it was announced. No module yet. Odd. Tim

    • @JDDupuy
      @JDDupuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Crickets from them. Ordered and paid for mine 29 Aug 2023. Spectrum is a waste of space these days. I'm down to 2 radios from them. Jeti, Graupner and Radiomaster are my go to radios.

    • @gordonmckay4523
      @gordonmckay4523 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@JDDupuy Most odd on Spektrum lack of response. Tim

  • @edwarddranetz171
    @edwarddranetz171 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Still confused ???? So were to fly and how to get permeation ? Recreational flying locations? Were not to fly... ok use common sense....do you still have to register with the FFA ????. Thanks Tim, Goode Job bringing this information to our attention..

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      All RC pilots need an FAA registration number. $5 for three years, one number for all models (recreational). Stay below 400 feet altitude and use the app B4UFLY to ensure all flights are in uncontrolled airspace. Tim

  • @reworkfpv7359
    @reworkfpv7359 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Where is that cute little airplane that normally sits on your workbench

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The Guillow Aeronca. On the pegboard wall, need to remember to take it out! Tim

  • @JDDupuy
    @JDDupuy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spectrum engineer can talk to you but can't seem to get their units into the hands of customers who paid 3 months ago. Thank goodness for Holy Stone RID modules.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, most odd on Spektrum's part. Tim

  • @stevendegiorgio3143
    @stevendegiorgio3143 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't think remote ID is really required for actual radio control model airplanes.Airplanes are flown line of sight and maned at all times.Airplanes fly at a high rate of speed very low to the ground.My planes don't have anything outside of the normal servos and receiver and now of course an ESC.I think all this remote ID stuff is for multi rotor type drones that fly automouslly well beyond like of sight and at a very high altitude.I think the FAA is just being concerned about the potential of a midair collision with a full scale aircraft.This danger simply doesn't exist in the classic radio control model airplane/helicopter flying hobby.I have been flying without remote ID and it's been non eventful,just another day at the park field.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Negatory. All RC planes over 250 grams and less than 55 lbs need RID, unless flying in a FRIA. Tim

    • @jasonhurdlow6607
      @jasonhurdlow6607 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Is it rational and reasonable? Absolutely not.
      Is it legally required? Yes.
      Your government at work.
      😢

    • @richardjohnson2331
      @richardjohnson2331 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Just because you don't fly rc airplanes high doesn't mean it doesn't happen. It has happened for a long time. Airplanes were the first FPV and long range platform and still are the most popular for BVLOS. Also, the danger in quads is primarily from camera drone operators (DJI style). Racing drones are kept within 500 ft and not higher than 20 ft in normal operation. Racing drone pilots are highly skilled. The problem is lawmakers are ignorant and listening to corporate interests who are chasing venture capital.

    • @gordonmckay4523
      @gordonmckay4523 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@richardjohnson2331 Seriously?

    • @richardjohnson2331
      @richardjohnson2331 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @gordonmckay4523 Yes. The point is that lumping in all quad pilots together as dangerous and untrained is wrong. There are racing drone pilots who have skills way beyond most rc plane pilots. The reason for all this added regulation is not quad pilots. It is the lobbying of the corporate drone industry. If safety was the goal, the FAA focus wouldn't be on enforcement, it would be on training. Blaming quad pilots is a cop out.

  • @smesui1799
    @smesui1799 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hey Tim; just what is the cost of that horizon hobby RID module ?

    • @rudyho3790
      @rudyho3790 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      (psst... don' be shy..go to horizon and look up $..😉)

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      The SkyID lists for around $100. They have/had a pre-order special price of $70, not sure if that is still in play. Tim

    • @smesui1799
      @smesui1799 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@rudyho3790 Rather hear it from Tim for all to hear. I stay clear of HH. Not my cup of tea ☕ with their exorbitant prices.

  • @CentralPaRcFlying
    @CentralPaRcFlying 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why would an ARF be even considered, not knowing what system /options will be put into it? BNF Models are an easier call.

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Good point! Tim

  • @DumbledoreMcCracken
    @DumbledoreMcCracken 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mr. Microphone is back :

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      👍🏻😊 Tim

  • @independentdronechannel170
    @independentdronechannel170 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😁👍

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      👍🏻😊 Tim

  • @TheOriginalSOOTY
    @TheOriginalSOOTY 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Drones have killed a fun and interesting hobby .

    • @TimMcKay56
      @TimMcKay56  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Drones have certainly impacted the RC hobby, but we’ll pull through. Tim

    • @jackguinn8462
      @jackguinn8462 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Snooty,Can't blame it on me and my drone. Careful,stick yer nose up in the air to high ya might drown if it came good rain storm.

    • @jackguinn8462
      @jackguinn8462 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I'm sure the "new"will wear off. I've had my "drone" for nearly 3 yrs.,and have never had it out of the house yet. I,m 71 yrs. old and a retired(just recently) longhaul truck driver looking for something to pass my time with. Wouldn't hurt for you to "cut a little slack" to folks that don't want to fly planes. Rant over.

    • @gordonmckay4523
      @gordonmckay4523 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jackguinn8462 Jack: No worries, thanks for checking in! Tim