I think the concept of the mission, having to coordinate CAS with the ground forces to take positions, is an interesting 'idea'; it just fails pretty badly at surfacing how exactly you're supposed to do it.
Another of those "cute ideas, bad execution" things. That may as well be AC5's tagline. The problem with the bunker thing is it doesn't really explain how it works. "Synchronized attacks", I get it, but... what's the details? Is there a specific attack window? Specific weapon that's effective? Shooting them when they appear does the job fine, though, but... Ehh.
yeah, AC5 did introduce a lot of unique features for it's time. However those same features haven't aged well in the game as they were poorly done in the game. Most notable of them is the Wingman command, it's great but it falls flat when you realize that your wingmen aren't doing anything.
What do you mean? The game tells you exactly how to deal with the bunkers. "This is company B, we are held back by enemy fire, attack the enemy bunker, we'll charge at the same time" for example. The companies on the ground call out when to attack, and you have a window of time after the communication to destroy the bunker. You can just read wich company is calling for CAS and fly there to provide support. It's even highlighted in full blue when that sort of communication happens. If you try to destroy the bunker before the company calls the attack, the bunker will become operational again in a short time.
@@jewchini6261 yep! This game, as all Ace Combat games, are full of chatter. Most of it are casual callouts and random communications but some are actually very important. Important communications are usually highlighted in blue or red, depending on who's talking.
Both the ground troops and Nagase (at 6:12) explain that none of your planes has proper weaponry to destroy the bunkers (i.e. bunker busters) and you can at best suppress their atacks with superficial strikes so the ground forces have time to storm into them and finish the job for good. That's the synchronized attack, you should engage the bunkers only once the ground forces get close enough and anounce they're read to use the window you'll create, else they'll become opperational again soon after.
I'm playing this mission but keep failing for some reason, I took out all the bunkers and minimized the damage to ground troops but every time we make it to the "top hill area" I fail
I gave up OpenGL on some mission finally, it lags like hell;; I already ended up using HUD in mission 4 because of lag. OpenGL's Optimization is so awful, utilizing only 50% of CPU/GPU, while it gives nearly all effect of software rendering. ( I finally fixed all graphic issue currently. ) So, for this reason, I regret insisting you to use OpenGL. Actually the problem was widescreen hack itself, so if you are going for cockpit run, or not using WS hack anymore, I'd still recommend you of OGL ;) Have a nice day!
Guessing this is referring to PCSX2 (if not, I apologize). Since I’m from the future, 1.7 versions seem to have fixed a multitude of problems with PS2 games, including Ace Combat. Resulting in fewer graphical errors and better performance, so now you can play in Hardware mode and have less of a hassle getting the game to run well.
Why have your squadron COVER? I would ask my team to help me but I know it's your style but why have them cover for you? I know I cannot beat this game alone but what I say is my honest and personal opinion.
More kills for me, and more spectacle to show on video. I use allied attack a lot in AC6 where there's tons of enemies (and they don't steal your score), but here it'd take away from my fun, and from your entertainment.
Ah, Operation Bunker Shot v0.2.
"They're never gonna call us losers again!" Whatever motivates you, man. XD
Lemmy I agree those guys on the ground aren't as crazy as the parachute unit from Ace combat Zero however.
"Use that anger to get fired up!" "We're the best! We're the best!" Yeah, those guys were pretty nuts for sure. :P
I always loved this levels music
I think the concept of the mission, having to coordinate CAS with the ground forces to take positions, is an interesting 'idea'; it just fails pretty badly at surfacing how exactly you're supposed to do it.
"Roger, modifying the chain of command."
Intresting, so the beach is called "wave" (transelation from volna)
AC5 generally just takes basic words from other languages for the locations
like why
@@Dan-379Without translation, they sound cool.
For example, Ahi sounds cool without translation, but it’s Hawaiian for “Fire”.
Another of those "cute ideas, bad execution" things. That may as well be AC5's tagline. The problem with the bunker thing is it doesn't really explain how it works. "Synchronized attacks", I get it, but... what's the details? Is there a specific attack window? Specific weapon that's effective? Shooting them when they appear does the job fine, though, but... Ehh.
yeah, AC5 did introduce a lot of unique features for it's time. However those same features haven't aged well in the game as they were poorly done in the game. Most notable of them is the Wingman command, it's great but it falls flat when you realize that your wingmen aren't doing anything.
What do you mean? The game tells you exactly how to deal with the bunkers.
"This is company B, we are held back by enemy fire, attack the enemy bunker, we'll charge at the same time" for example. The companies on the ground call out when to attack, and you have a window of time after the communication to destroy the bunker. You can just read wich company is calling for CAS and fly there to provide support. It's even highlighted in full blue when that sort of communication happens.
If you try to destroy the bunker before the company calls the attack, the bunker will become operational again in a short time.
@@tharionthedragon3531 wait THATS WHY THEY KEPT COMING BACK?????
Jesus christ 11 year old me was losing my shit because I knew I was destroying them.
@@jewchini6261 yep! This game, as all Ace Combat games, are full of chatter. Most of it are casual callouts and random communications but some are actually very important. Important communications are usually highlighted in blue or red, depending on who's talking.
Both the ground troops and Nagase (at 6:12) explain that none of your planes has proper weaponry to destroy the bunkers (i.e. bunker busters) and you can at best suppress their atacks with superficial strikes so the ground forces have time to storm into them and finish the job for good.
That's the synchronized attack, you should engage the bunkers only once the ground forces get close enough and anounce they're read to use the window you'll create, else they'll become opperational again soon after.
I'm playing this mission but keep failing for some reason, I took out all the bunkers and minimized the damage to ground troops but every time we make it to the "top hill area" I fail
I gave up OpenGL on some mission finally, it lags like hell;;
I already ended up using HUD in mission 4 because of lag.
OpenGL's Optimization is so awful, utilizing only 50% of CPU/GPU, while it gives nearly all effect of software rendering. ( I finally fixed all graphic issue currently. )
So, for this reason, I regret insisting you to use OpenGL. Actually the problem was widescreen hack itself, so if you are going for cockpit run, or not using WS hack anymore, I'd still recommend you of OGL ;)
Have a nice day!
really? you ran into a problem? which mission was it where OpenGl gave you a hard time....Also how did you fix the graphics issues for Direct3D11?
well, It's not lagging without WS hack, but I wanted to use it
..maybe better stick to HUD
Guessing this is referring to PCSX2 (if not, I apologize). Since I’m from the future, 1.7 versions seem to have fixed a multitude of problems with PS2 games, including Ace Combat. Resulting in fewer graphical errors and better performance, so now you can play in Hardware mode and have less of a hassle getting the game to run well.
@@Dr.Oofers sounds like it's finally time to jump back into good ol' game!
Why have your squadron COVER? I would ask my team to help me but I know it's your style but why have them cover for you? I know I cannot beat this game alone but what I say is my honest and personal opinion.
More kills for me, and more spectacle to show on video. I use allied attack a lot in AC6 where there's tons of enemies (and they don't steal your score), but here it'd take away from my fun, and from your entertainment.
@@TugaAvenger Okay I can respect and see that I meant no disrespect earlier.