Man United are becoming the 'Sports Direct Newcastle'. It's a matter of time before these INEOS decisions drive the club to a state where the fans will revolt.
trying to fix over 10 years of damage done by the glazers, maybe not the most poular decisions but hey, act like all the other man utd fans that was screaming for someone to fix things and now when got one moan that you don't like what they are doing.
I think to say Ineos don't care is a bit ridiculous to say the least. The club is in a dire situation and yes they have to put a stop to it. unfortunately they have to do the dirty work the Glazers wouldn't do.
The Glazers still own the majority of the team. Ineos control the football decisions, don’t the Glazers control the rest, including ticket prices? SJR also put 300 million of his own money into the club. And who’s to say that in this contract there isn’t some sort of understanding where either party isn’t to speak out against the other
No glazers have taken a back seat whilst being majority owners. They have played a smart move. Kept control but allowed an egotist to take over united and think he can fix it.
It is absolutely cringe isn't it. I mentioned this a week or so ago on a video here...whoever pioneered the 'coming up' intro needs taking out back. The black and white or monotone filter over the top of it just takes the cake.
@@MrBaronCabron I kind of get it on hour+ long videos... that said I still skip it. Would be interested to see the numbers of people who actually watch it.
@@callummcdermidI just cannot stand it on any videos me, no matter the length. Watching something in monochrome you're ready to watch due to clicking on the video in the first place is just completely alien to me.
Glazers: Financial excess for 19 years, use the club like a personal ATM through dividend payments and nearly bankrupt it in the process, forcing the need for outside investment (INEOS) in order to save it. Ratcliffe: Trying to undo 19 years of financial excess through the necessary short-term pain of cost cuts - not as a means to extract income but to make club long term sustainable - and puts in £300m of his own money in order to help matters. If you don't like Ratcliffe, that's fair. But Adam drawing any kind of comparison between him and the rats by calling him 'Jim Glazer' is the height of idiocy.
Well he got in bed with the glazers... thats exactly ehat the glazers wanted let Ineos get all the criticism whilst they stay in the back carry on leeching..... all this could have been avoided had Rat boy didnt give them exactly ehat they needed and wanted
Perfectly articulated bro. But INEOS put in a bid that saw the Glazers staying in the 1st place. When there was a better option in Qatar. If he is a Man united fan as he claims, he should have backed away, and allowed Qatar's bid to be chosen so this club could be sustainable again. Not this mayhem he has caused for over 12months of acquiring a stake in the club.
Kids pay £9 at Anfield, not £66 Sir Jim. £66 would get you a seat in the stand and, much as it grieves me, you watch better football too. Then again, they don't have a big debt, £170m I think, and don't pay stupid money for average players.
I have rarely agreed with anything that Scholes has said. He got paid to play football but I wish these ex-united players weren't hanging around in the media.
The Glazers are just like the Oyston's using their club as a cash cow. Im an Argyle fan with no axe to grind. Mr Ratcliffe is a ruthless in business so please don't expect him to look after you.
@@FullTimeDevilsnot true, the players we bought were amortised forward, PSR rules won't let us sell them at a loss, we can't afford to, UCL is probably a 70m loss, Adidas is likely 10m loss, to just sell Antony may be a 30m loss we can lose 110m over 3 years, we have to sell pure profit players and cut costs or there will be very limited signings. We don't just buy a player in full, it's spread out, and until they can be sold for MORE than we paid for them in that forward projected year, we can't do anything, unless we cut costs, like they have and they made 40m headroom with the cost cutting, if we sell pure profit players we can add that to the 40m that allows us to buy, if we do nothing we are screwed
There is only one thing worse than players and staff feeling entitled and that is moaning and groaning, ultra negative, and hysterical fans feeling entitled. What would they have Ineos do? Carry on papering over the cracks?!!. The cracks that suddenly appeared nearly 20 years ago with the advent of Oligarch and state owned clubs.
Cutting the negligible expenses on staff benefits, disabled supporters funding, etc is not going to make a single modicum of difference when it comes to competing with the other top clubs in the Premier League. For perspective, the £40,000 Man Utd spend on the Disabled Supporters Association each year equates to approximately 36 hours of Anthony's salary. It would take 44 years for the savings made on reduced staff Christmas bonuses to cover the cost of Dan Ashworth's alleged pay-out after being sacked (not including the buy-out paid to Newcastle and 5 months of salary). The total saving on staff bonuses probably equates to the entire annual salary of a single, relatively junior, admin worker. The morale-driven reduction in performance from staff as a result of constant redundancies and poorer working conditions will probably far outweigh the positive impact of such miniscule savings. If you price fans out of attending games then you lose your next generation of fans. The next generation are far less likely to follow Man Utd religiously if they weren't afforded the opportunity to attend matches as children. Instead they turn to piracy and illegal streams and pay you next to nothing over their lives. INEOS are casting aside the lifeblood of the club, the fans and local community who have kept Man Utd afloat for over a century, for short-term negligible gains. Bayern Munich charge €140 for a season ticket in the standing section of the Allianz Arena and have been far more competitive in Europe over the last decade than Man Utd. As Bayern President Uli Hoeness once said: “We could charge more than £104 [for a season ticket]. Let's say we charged £300. We'd get £2m more in income, but what's £2m to us? In a transfer discussion you argue about that sum for five minutes. But the difference between £104 and £300 is huge for the fan. We do not think the fans are like cows, who you milk,”
@@MichaelH3948 Blame the glazers for this over a decade,Now they want Ineos to be their funding scheme like a pyramid scheme,It’s all a scam and a hoax over the issues of Man United,The constant terrible decisions they have made have cost the performance on the pitch,Whilst now hacking off the fans and support staff,Now they are being layed off and sacked whilst charging fans insane prices for bad choices by the Glazers,Nothing adds up…They are not to fund United,Or the future,But it’s regime.
Why not include Glazers as the main culprits... Ineos inherited a quite unhealthy financial status + unfit players with costly contracts... How to escape unpopular moves? Why the glazers not sell their ownership to debt free buyers?
All these economical decisions are taken by glazers and INEOS are taking the blame. Classic machiavellianism. INEOS are not going to be around for a long time but their purpose will be served. INEOS sole purpose is to be a blame shield for the glazers. When INEOS entered the club their responsibility was going to be the sporting side of the club adn the glazers would continue with the financial, so why are INEOS now involved in every financial aspect. If they're doing the sporting part and the financial part, what are the glazers doing?
@@GnralexPlus Most sports teams here are in major markets where there could be millions of people who may want to see a game at any given time. It's this competition for seats that drives the price (supply/demand). We also have a higher disposable income than you guys and we also pay less in taxes, therefore more people have the $ to do it.
The Glazers debt, Adam reiterated what I’ve been saying all along. The campaign needs to be the Glazers have to pay the £890m debt and financing they have haemorrhaged United with!!
Cutting a fraction of £40,000 for the disabled supporters association is not increasing revenue. That is negligible and insignificant. Doesn't even pay Anthony for 1 day. A club that can afford to spend £80m on Anthony and £72 million on Hojlund doesn't need to maximise revenue at all costs, it needs to spend its existing revenue in a more competent manner. If you allowed a competently run club like Newcastle, Villa, or Brighton to spend £1.2 bn (net) on players and accrue the fourth highest wage bill in the world over the next decade they would win league titles and Champions League trophies yet Man Utd have a Europa League and a few FA Cups for the same expenditure and same timeframe. If you have the opportunity to generate more revenue from new sponsorship deals or a player recruitment strategy then sure, take it but the club has no reason whatsoever to milk fans for every penny they have, especially not the most vulnerable in OAPs, children and disabled supporters, or price out the average working class fan who, alongside his ancestors, kept the club afloat for over a century to cash in on wealthy tourists and corporate seats.
@ Anthony and Hojlund all part of the miss management by the glazers. The club financial position is much worse than people realise, we have milked global marketing deals but all of our competitors have now followed suit. I make no comment in terms of cuts other than this is a typical business process where everything gets cut back and departments have a target to hit. Manchester United is in real trouble and I don’t think anything is safe from cuts or to be sold. Academy players will probably be sold next
@@ThomasSpitzer1 And INEOS have inherited a club that generates the same amount of revenue as the one that was financially capable of overspending so much on the aforementioned players. Even if they cannot continue to spend at the rate in which they have in the past, they do not need to. Man Utd have a higher net spend over the past 10 years than any other club in the world, 50% higher than the next highest Chelsea. They should be more than capable of competing without such extreme penny pinching that hurts the club's most vulnerable supporters through greater competence when it comes to recruitment.
@ you cannot spend forever on a credit card if you are making a loss and your expenditure is more than your income, financial fair play rules over 3 years will take care of that. Why do you think the glazers had to sell part of the club ? These perspectives surprise me, we are now holding up the glazers spend and burn strategy as something to behold, United have not made a profit since 2019 and every year the deficit has increased, meaning it’s more expensive to borrow. As of 2024 the club owes around 1 billion, which increases every year. The glazer’s have used every method available to keep milking the club, from more borrowing, to floating the club, which is why we are here. Probably pisses people off but you have somebody now who has invested Money (glazers did not), not taking money out of the club ( glazers did) and is dealing with financial peril.
@@ThomasSpitzer1 I never even implied that the Glazers' transfer strategy was "something to behold". My entire point is that, as every consistently successful team over the past decade have proven, Man Utd does not need to spend at such excessive levels to be competitive. Man Utd are more than capable of being competitive whilst operating in the black through COMPETENT use of the financial resources that they already have rather than squeezing every conceivable penny out of fans and extreme cost-cutting measures. Man Utd generate more than enough revenue to be competitive at the highest level and remain profitable; players far better than those in the current squad were available over the past 10 years for far lower prices than what Man Utd paid for their overabundance of dead wood. A competent back room set up would have been able to identify them. Sure, extra revenue is always welcome, but the tangible benefit that the likes of the £45,000 saved in staff Christmas bonuses or £20,000 saved on the Disabled Supporters Association will actually bring to the club are enormously outweighed by the reputational damage, drop in staff morale and performance, and impact on local supporters.
All these xplayers think they know what goes on in the corporate football world,truth is they know nothing just giving opinions that don’t even scratch the surface .
The club is a business, not a charity. I understand that football clubs have passionate followings and fans for life, but they aren't willing to band together and fund their clubs
When will old, cynical 'has-beens' either stay quiet or accept that modern football is a business? Just because you played the game doesn’t mean you know how to run it.
@sm11ie01.Ex players from any club are always in the media,and United are no exception.I personally always agree with what the likes of what Scholes and Keane say as they always had high standards when they were playing.
Years of fuck all from the Glazers is what got us here. I frankly don't give a shit if concessions are gone, the club is in a right state and treating fans like entitled children isn't going to fix it.
Lets face it manchester united has outgrown manchester . Its now a massive global football club if that locals can't pay 66 quid . The tourists will very simple . Deal with it
United Adam needs to understand is.. They want rid of the season ticket holder, they know they sell hospitality tickets and all this other shite at extortionate prices. Look at the cost of a single NHL, NBA or NFL ticket game in USA, Upward on $250 - $300 Dollars a ticket. And thats what these bastards want
@ they don’t have to be the god guys. Take your emotions out of it. The club are in massive debt the current squad is shit beyond comprehension. The first thing you do is cut off money that doesn’t need to be payed out. Ex player charities like wth, sacking hundreds of employees that possibly don’t add much value, destroying player fc all these are to stabilise our money. It’s a business
These lot just don't understand businesses atall. SJR has todo what he is doing to cut back the cost that are crippling thr club. Once again a small minority whinge
It is not about the Glazers or the Radcliffes or Amorim neither TenHag !!!!! IT IS because you consider extremely average players super stars . Man U is full of players that don’t belong there . Hojlund , Garnacho ,Zirkzee , Mainoo ,Mazraoui , the Dutch defender , Rashford ……. All should be EFL players !!! Wake up !!!!
Glazers have ran the club into the ground and shouted “we need saving for our money income to continue!”,Here comes Ineos and bails them out whilst the club gets shafted and its fans,It’s all a scam,I don’t like any of them and our team is the same cr*p as before! Nothing will change unless they are GONE.
INEOS are doing exactly what they are FORCED TO DO, they cant sell any players at a loss, they need to buy players, tuey either sell the best players that are pure profit or they dramatically cut costs, yes we were bloated, but EVERY penny helps with PSR, the debt only incurs 20m loss a year...its all about FFP not penny pinching, no UCL is a 70m loss, plus 15m loss from Adidas we can only lose 30m a year..what do you want them to do?
Nonsense, MUFC are over a billion in debt, unpopular decisions had to be made, and more to come. Reality is if it was not addressed MUFC could go into administration.
McKola must have some good friends at Paddock judging by the fact he is still in these videos. Imagine saying all this stuff about Ratcliffe and Ineos just because they are trying to fix the problem. “Pretends to be the man of the people, sacks everyone left, right and center… its not out debt” “I can take or leave Antony being at Man Utd if it means ticket prices stay the same” What a shallow analysis for someone who has a voice online.
It's all PSR, we can't sell any player at a loss, that's why Antony stays, the fact that the glazers staggered payments over many years mean these poor signings from the football board can't be sold or they will be a recorded loss...we can't afford to offload any players that represent a loss, only players that are pure profit, like we did with mctom. And will likely do with one of Garnacho, Rashford or Mainoo...it's all PSR related...all the cuts at the club are ONLY because of FFP plus the lack of UCL and Adidas money
I wouldn’t dare pay 60 quid to watch United anymore we are shit now there isn’t 1 player in that squad that excites me. Why would fans want to pay more than 60 quid to watch zirkzee and Rasmus get bullied
Ineos are so far removed from the fans. It's not just the local area. Fans travel from all around the UK , Ireland and the world to watch Utd. So bad they didnt consult the fans first amd explain x,y,z . Mind let's be real. No billionaire on the planet local born or not gives a monkeys about the every day person who either supports them or is employed by them. The glazers have dome such a bad job that Utd will pay the price for years and tears to come.
This guy Adam is highly negative and this bloke hardly find anything +ve with United. Also, he seems to believe that Rashford still deserves a chance in the team, after all the ruckus he had done. If you observe closely, all his issues mainly with the INEOS started after the Rasford fiasco.
Not sure the owners care about match going fans. Money is in streaming and touring around the world. Might be a day a “home” game doesn’t mean anything anymore its just played in stadium/country who pays the most.
lol look at the united fan base screaming change, screaming for glazers out..then when a minority owner tries to make change by doing unpopular things the fan base starts to act like little cry baby 🐩’s
Exactly. We have been run like a charity with everyone leeching off our money we put into the club. David Gill, great as he was, was still getting £1 million+ a year salary after he left!
These utd fans are unbelievable. Trying to be the peoples team now, give me a break! Utd are just another corporate entity, just like city, Liverpool arsenal &co.
I like Adam, but feels like he allows his emotions to get the better of him. Just because the changes they make feel wrong, doesn't mean they are. If you complain about the way they do thing's, then please at least present solutions that are the supposed "better alternatives".
Ratcliffe is full of Shit,simple,until clubs get the German model of Fan Ownership the problems will get worse.His Story of lifelong boyhood fan of United is Complete Nonsense,how many die hard United fans would own a Chelsea season ticket and try to buy the Club,seriously! All of his many sports ventures are mere Vanity projects.
Full sale would have made little difference, as much as I still wish it happened. We pay 20m interest on the clubs debt, that's not much, the dividends are also small. By getting a full sale we would save only 30m a year maximum that we could spend, that's the only difference, yes they could spend on the stadium and women's team, but Newcastle are the richest club in the world yet they cant spend it for similar reasons, their owners and ours amortised forward, they bought players and pay them off over many years, but a player needs to be off the books for some time, ie paid off....before we can make a profit, and no profit means no sales unless they are pure profit like Garnacho and Rashford and Mainoo and like McTom was last season
The red flag was there before ineos completed their investment, they were willing to let the glazers stay, that is the red flag right there and the desperation of the fans decided to ignore it.
@redroobarb4562 because the glazers were being greedy and overpriced the club. They loaded the debt on the club, meaning the new owner had to inherit the debt. Thats why no one wanted to buy.
This is my surprised face that a tax dodging malicious billionaire is stripping back a well established outfit and punishing the people at the bottom to make more profit. They're parasites. I said it from the cusp of all this when it was announced the Glazers were possibly looking to sell. We should have done an ex player consortium that was backed by the entire UTD fan base via a subscription/fan union and cooperative type situation. I'd have happily paid £100 a year or something to be a member of the fans union. Millions of other fans would be too, lots already pay for season tickets and UTD membership already to get tickets easier.
Wheres Gary? Hes too busy making money in the manc revamp so he's lost his tongue the hypocrite. Jim wanted chelsea lets drop the "life long fan" waffle. Hes a glazer enabler.
Tbf I’m shocked anyone is surprised. Football is a political capitalist function. If you didn’t know this the blame is on you. A season long empty stadium will have this rhetoric changed in no time - but “you’re alright Jack”
We were told abt how ineos work & we didn’t hear. We had the chance to sell our team to someone who’s ready to pay of all our debt, and was ready to invest in our team yet they sold our team to another company who’re almost like glazer family.. what do you expect ?
What have you made of the decisions by INEOS so far?
Shocking
Worst FC owers I ever seeing with my eyes no lie ..
Man United are becoming the 'Sports Direct Newcastle'. It's a matter of time before these INEOS decisions drive the club to a state where the fans will revolt.
They did such a great job with Team Sky and Nice, I’m sure it’ll all go well…
trying to fix over 10 years of damage done by the glazers, maybe not the most poular decisions but hey, act like all the other man utd fans that was screaming for someone to fix things and now when got one moan that you don't like what they are doing.
I think to say Ineos don't care is a bit ridiculous to say the least. The club is in a dire situation and yes they have to put a stop to it. unfortunately they have to do the dirty work the Glazers wouldn't do.
The Glazers still own the majority of the team. Ineos control the football decisions, don’t the Glazers control the rest, including ticket prices? SJR also put 300 million of his own money into the club.
And who’s to say that in this contract there isn’t some sort of understanding where either party isn’t to speak out against the other
No glazers have taken a back seat whilst being majority owners. They have played a smart move. Kept control but allowed an egotist to take over united and think he can fix it.
Where did he put that money?
Bless your cotton socks
@@dairefinnie1533 you want receipts? why don’t you ring him and put in a request.
He put £3 million in for extra shares - not from the kindest of his heart! He’s been awful for the heart and soul of our club!
This
"coming up" on an 8 min video. Behave.
It is absolutely cringe isn't it. I mentioned this a week or so ago on a video here...whoever pioneered the 'coming up' intro needs taking out back.
The black and white or monotone filter over the top of it just takes the cake.
@@MrBaronCabron I kind of get it on hour+ long videos... that said I still skip it. Would be interested to see the numbers of people who actually watch it.
It really aint that deep
@@Pathogenixdnbit actually is though, when you waste your time on these videos the time adds up.
@@callummcdermidI just cannot stand it on any videos me, no matter the length. Watching something in monochrome you're ready to watch due to clicking on the video in the first place is just completely alien to me.
How can you talk to carragher when he spits at young girls on the motorway because they are Utd fans .
Ffs get over it - your probably still thinking about the 90s
Mr perfect never made a mistake
@@IrishArizonaI agree i support united but fuck me people still bring this up what a joke
he spat at a car you blurt, not 'young girls'...
He spat at a young girl, you melts
Because mckola is all about himself. Pretends to have virtue!
I think you guys drastically underestimate how poorly financially the Glazers, had been running the club.
we also didn’t beg ineos to join the party when the glazers wd hv been desperate for cash n we hv been forced to sell
Glazers: Financial excess for 19 years, use the club like a personal ATM through dividend payments and nearly bankrupt it in the process, forcing the need for outside investment (INEOS) in order to save it.
Ratcliffe: Trying to undo 19 years of financial excess through the necessary short-term pain of cost cuts - not as a means to extract income but to make club long term sustainable - and puts in £300m of his own money in order to help matters.
If you don't like Ratcliffe, that's fair.
But Adam drawing any kind of comparison between him and the rats by calling him 'Jim Glazer' is the height of idiocy.
Agreed
This is almost certainly why they went for this kind of "sale", as well. INEOS get all the PR heat, Glazers still rake in the dividends.
Well he got in bed with the glazers... thats exactly ehat the glazers wanted let Ineos get all the criticism whilst they stay in the back carry on leeching..... all this could have been avoided had Rat boy didnt give them exactly ehat they needed and wanted
Perfectly articulated bro.
But they decided to put in a bid that made sure the glazers stayed in the 1st place.
Perfectly articulated bro.
But INEOS put in a bid that saw the Glazers staying in the 1st place.
When there was a better option in Qatar. If he is a Man united fan as he claims, he should have backed away, and allowed Qatar's bid to be chosen so this club could be sustainable again. Not this mayhem he has caused for over 12months of acquiring a stake in the club.
Kids pay £9 at Anfield, not £66 Sir Jim. £66 would get you a seat in the stand and, much as it grieves me, you watch better football too. Then again, they don't have a big debt, £170m I think, and don't pay stupid money for average players.
Yes but it’s not Ineos tbf,That’s on the Glazers
Just think about this ineos has raised the ticket prices when this is the worse man Utd team in decades
I have rarely agreed with anything that Scholes has said. He got paid to play football but I wish these ex-united players weren't hanging around in the media.
He’s actually a very nice person and is a human person,He also has a son with autism i think who’s fairly severe.
I wish u wasn't in the media who gives a shit bout you
Better than the fan channels
Lol you agree with Jay and that Jesus looking fella instead ?
Melt.
@CorruptedMufcJesus looking fella 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Austerity Jim
The Glazers are just like the Oyston's using their club as a cash cow. Im an Argyle fan with no axe to grind.
Mr Ratcliffe is a ruthless in business so please don't expect him to look after you.
They're money men. They don't care.
Does look like that doesn’t it?
Please remove the "coming up" bs intro thing. Just start the video right away@@FullTimeDevils
@@FullTimeDevilsnot true, the players we bought were amortised forward, PSR rules won't let us sell them at a loss, we can't afford to, UCL is probably a 70m loss, Adidas is likely 10m loss, to just sell Antony may be a 30m loss we can lose 110m over 3 years, we have to sell pure profit players and cut costs or there will be very limited signings.
We don't just buy a player in full, it's spread out, and until they can be sold for MORE than we paid for them in that forward projected year, we can't do anything, unless we cut costs, like they have and they made 40m headroom with the cost cutting, if we sell pure profit players we can add that to the 40m that allows us to buy, if we do nothing we are screwed
The Everton fan thought bringing up Onana was an own, but Onana is statistically one of the best goalies in the league
😂😂😂😂 typical deluded fan
He's 5th against XG, how am I deluded?
@@JV431 who cares about stats and xg onana is trash even in Cameroon they doesn't rate him and he got dropped several times
@@skanderkroumi865 "who cares about stats"... I value stats more than being factually wrong 👍 argue with a wall
@@JV431 He’s your average utd hater 😂
There is only one thing worse than players and staff feeling entitled and that is moaning and groaning, ultra negative, and hysterical fans feeling entitled. What would they have Ineos do? Carry on papering over the cracks?!!. The cracks that suddenly appeared nearly 20 years ago with the advent of Oligarch and state owned clubs.
Cutting the negligible expenses on staff benefits, disabled supporters funding, etc is not going to make a single modicum of difference when it comes to competing with the other top clubs in the Premier League. For perspective, the £40,000 Man Utd spend on the Disabled Supporters Association each year equates to approximately 36 hours of Anthony's salary. It would take 44 years for the savings made on reduced staff Christmas bonuses to cover the cost of Dan Ashworth's alleged pay-out after being sacked (not including the buy-out paid to Newcastle and 5 months of salary). The total saving on staff bonuses probably equates to the entire annual salary of a single, relatively junior, admin worker. The morale-driven reduction in performance from staff as a result of constant redundancies and poorer working conditions will probably far outweigh the positive impact of such miniscule savings.
If you price fans out of attending games then you lose your next generation of fans. The next generation are far less likely to follow Man Utd religiously if they weren't afforded the opportunity to attend matches as children. Instead they turn to piracy and illegal streams and pay you next to nothing over their lives. INEOS are casting aside the lifeblood of the club, the fans and local community who have kept Man Utd afloat for over a century, for short-term negligible gains.
Bayern Munich charge €140 for a season ticket in the standing section of the Allianz Arena and have been far more competitive in Europe over the last decade than Man Utd. As Bayern President Uli Hoeness once said:
“We could charge more than £104 [for a season ticket]. Let's say we charged £300. We'd get £2m more in income, but what's £2m to us? In a transfer discussion you argue about that sum for five minutes. But the difference between £104 and £300 is huge for the fan. We do not think the fans are like cows, who you milk,”
@@MichaelH3948 Blame the glazers for this over a decade,Now they want Ineos to be their funding scheme like a pyramid scheme,It’s all a scam and a hoax over the issues of Man United,The constant terrible decisions they have made have cost the performance on the pitch,Whilst now hacking off the fans and support staff,Now they are being layed off and sacked whilst charging fans insane prices for bad choices by the Glazers,Nothing adds up…They are not to fund United,Or the future,But it’s regime.
Why not include Glazers as the main culprits... Ineos inherited a quite unhealthy financial status + unfit players with costly contracts...
How to escape unpopular moves?
Why the glazers not sell their ownership to debt free buyers?
Told you, while RATCLIFFE is in the glaziers pocket we are still in trouble.
The Fulham quote was not wrong, but he could have used multiple other clubs like Wolves, Villa, Everton, all charging more for tickets.
All these economical decisions are taken by glazers and INEOS are taking the blame. Classic machiavellianism. INEOS are not going to be around for a long time but their purpose will be served. INEOS sole purpose is to be a blame shield for the glazers. When INEOS entered the club their responsibility was going to be the sporting side of the club adn the glazers would continue with the financial, so why are INEOS now involved in every financial aspect. If they're doing the sporting part and the financial part, what are the glazers doing?
How convenient there's no mention of Kevin Dawson or Alan Smith.
The average ticket price to watch my Philadelphia Eagles here in America is $224. Hopefully that makes you all feel a bit better.
Or about $100 to go to a hockey or basketball game. I knew we had it bad but $66 for any sporting event sounds like a dream in America
As Someone who has no idea about american sports, why are the ticket prices so high?
@@GnralexPlus Most sports teams here are in major markets where there could be millions of people who may want to see a game at any given time. It's this competition for seats that drives the price (supply/demand). We also have a higher disposable income than you guys and we also pay less in taxes, therefore more people have the $ to do it.
No. It doesn’t. Because our clubs are now being owned by your American businessmen changing the game of football for the worse.
@@toddj1914 No they don’t,Americans in most states pay insane tax.
The tourists lol he does realise he’s from Birmingham doesn’t he
Go to bed
Ratcliffe and the Glaziers share the same ethics. Ratcliffe is a billionaire who sees an opportunity to make money out of an ailing football club.
The Glazers debt, Adam reiterated what I’ve been saying all along. The campaign needs to be the Glazers have to pay the £890m debt and financing they have haemorrhaged United with!!
Comparing ticket prices with Fulham, come on tho. 🤦♂️
And what percentage of utd fans at old Trafford are from anywhere near Manchester.
Everybody wanted the club to be run properly and now it is they are moaning. We cannot invest without increasing revenue because of ffp.
Cutting a fraction of £40,000 for the disabled supporters association is not increasing revenue. That is negligible and insignificant. Doesn't even pay Anthony for 1 day. A club that can afford to spend £80m on Anthony and £72 million on Hojlund doesn't need to maximise revenue at all costs, it needs to spend its existing revenue in a more competent manner. If you allowed a competently run club like Newcastle, Villa, or Brighton to spend £1.2 bn (net) on players and accrue the fourth highest wage bill in the world over the next decade they would win league titles and Champions League trophies yet Man Utd have a Europa League and a few FA Cups for the same expenditure and same timeframe.
If you have the opportunity to generate more revenue from new sponsorship deals or a player recruitment strategy then sure, take it but the club has no reason whatsoever to milk fans for every penny they have, especially not the most vulnerable in OAPs, children and disabled supporters, or price out the average working class fan who, alongside his ancestors, kept the club afloat for over a century to cash in on wealthy tourists and corporate seats.
@ Anthony and Hojlund all part of the miss management by the glazers. The club financial position is much worse than people realise, we have milked global marketing deals but all of our competitors have now followed suit. I make no comment in terms of cuts other than this is a typical business process where everything gets cut back and departments have a target to hit. Manchester United is in real trouble and I don’t think anything is safe from cuts or to be sold. Academy players will probably be sold next
@@ThomasSpitzer1 And INEOS have inherited a club that generates the same amount of revenue as the one that was financially capable of overspending so much on the aforementioned players. Even if they cannot continue to spend at the rate in which they have in the past, they do not need to. Man Utd have a higher net spend over the past 10 years than any other club in the world, 50% higher than the next highest Chelsea. They should be more than capable of competing without such extreme penny pinching that hurts the club's most vulnerable supporters through greater competence when it comes to recruitment.
@ you cannot spend forever on a credit card if you are making a loss and your expenditure is more than your income, financial fair play rules over 3 years will take care of that. Why do you think the glazers had to sell part of the club ? These perspectives surprise me, we are now holding up the glazers spend and burn strategy as something to behold, United have not made a profit since 2019 and every year the deficit has increased, meaning it’s more expensive to borrow. As of 2024 the club owes around 1 billion, which increases every year. The glazer’s have used every method available to keep milking the club, from more borrowing, to floating the club, which is why we are here. Probably pisses people off but you have somebody now who has invested Money (glazers did not), not taking money out of the club ( glazers did) and is dealing with financial peril.
@@ThomasSpitzer1 I never even implied that the Glazers' transfer strategy was "something to behold". My entire point is that, as every consistently successful team over the past decade have proven, Man Utd does not need to spend at such excessive levels to be competitive. Man Utd are more than capable of being competitive whilst operating in the black through COMPETENT use of the financial resources that they already have rather than squeezing every conceivable penny out of fans and extreme cost-cutting measures.
Man Utd generate more than enough revenue to be competitive at the highest level and remain profitable; players far better than those in the current squad were available over the past 10 years for far lower prices than what Man Utd paid for their overabundance of dead wood. A competent back room set up would have been able to identify them. Sure, extra revenue is always welcome, but the tangible benefit that the likes of the £45,000 saved in staff Christmas bonuses or £20,000 saved on the Disabled Supporters Association will actually bring to the club are enormously outweighed by the reputational damage, drop in staff morale and performance, and impact on local supporters.
All these xplayers think they know what goes on in the corporate football world,truth is they know nothing just giving opinions that don’t even scratch the surface .
They're not paying for the debt, they're paying for how shit the club has been ran.
«They are acting like the glazers at the moment». No… They are trying to fix it. Something the glazers have never done.
How much do you think season tickets will cost if Utd get a new stadium?
Oh stop moaning! You are keeping INEOS and the Glazers at the club by attending matches and buying club merchandise.
The club is a business, not a charity. I understand that football clubs have passionate followings and fans for life, but they aren't willing to band together and fund their clubs
When will old, cynical 'has-beens' either stay quiet or accept that modern football is a business? Just because you played the game doesn’t mean you know how to run it.
@sm11ie01.Ex players from any club are always in the media,and United are no exception.I personally always agree with what the likes of what Scholes and Keane say as they always had high standards when they were playing.
Years of fuck all from the Glazers is what got us here. I frankly don't give a shit if concessions are gone, the club is in a right state and treating fans like entitled children isn't going to fix it.
we will see what happens, the whole ticket thing is kinda dumb, spend less on fast food every year but still…. I get it
Lets face it manchester united has outgrown manchester . Its now a massive global football club if that locals can't pay 66 quid . The tourists will very simple . Deal with it
United Adam needs to understand is.. They want rid of the season ticket holder, they know they sell hospitality tickets and all this other shite at extortionate prices. Look at the cost of a single NHL, NBA or NFL ticket game in USA, Upward on $250 - $300 Dollars a ticket. And thats what these bastards want
He’s the complete opposite to the glazers. Making changes whether they are good or bad in people’s opinion. Being nice isn’t always the way.
Treating your fanbase for relatively little gain make no sense. The bad publicity alone will erode good will.
Exactly how are they close to glazers
Wow..
And I thought we had reached peak stupidity level..but here you are.
Cutting funding for charities without even informing them? Firing hundreds of staff? Yea INEOS are the good guys!
@ they don’t have to be the god guys. Take your emotions out of it. The club are in massive debt the current squad is shit beyond comprehension. The first thing you do is cut off money that doesn’t need to be payed out. Ex player charities like wth, sacking hundreds of employees that possibly don’t add much value, destroying player fc all these are to stabilise our money. It’s a business
For the love of god stop that preview thingy,
PLEASE,
İ dont need a high dose of cringe at the start of every video
The money might be going to paying those millions in debt. Just a thought. We'll see at the next financial results.
Until this lot and Glaziers go the club will not go anywhere
The dig at antony is just pathetic. Honestly the fact you send Adam to this is shocking. Hes a childish slimebag, the very worst of the fan base
No money no honey
These lot just don't understand businesses atall. SJR has todo what he is doing to cut back the cost that are crippling thr club. Once again a small minority whinge
It is not about the Glazers or the Radcliffes or Amorim neither TenHag !!!!!
IT IS because you consider extremely average players super stars . Man U is full of players that don’t belong there .
Hojlund , Garnacho ,Zirkzee , Mainoo ,Mazraoui , the Dutch defender , Rashford ……. All should be EFL players !!!
Wake up !!!!
That’s not true Ratcliffe has put more money into club than the glazers did in years
Nice try Rory Jennings.
Tories interjections on these topics are invalid.
Spoken like a true Labourite. Who needs democracy? Just call someone a Tory and say they’re not allowed an opinion.
Glazers have ran the club into the ground and shouted “we need saving for our money income to continue!”,Here comes Ineos and bails them out whilst the club gets shafted and its fans,It’s all a scam,I don’t like any of them and our team is the same cr*p as before! Nothing will change unless they are GONE.
Don’t listen to a ex Liverpool player he’s delighted Utd are we’re are at the moment
INEOS are doing exactly what they are FORCED TO DO, they cant sell any players at a loss, they need to buy players, tuey either sell the best players that are pure profit or they dramatically cut costs, yes we were bloated, but EVERY penny helps with PSR, the debt only incurs 20m loss a year...its all about FFP not penny pinching, no UCL is a 70m loss, plus 15m loss from Adidas we can only lose 30m a year..what do you want them to do?
Nonsense, MUFC are over a billion in debt, unpopular decisions had to be made, and more to come. Reality is if it was not addressed MUFC could go into administration.
In your dreams. 💤
@iMANC6ix6ix I engage my brain unlike you
@richyclubsport5155 Your first comment confirmed to the world the only thing you have between your ears is an amoeba.
@JohnSmith-kb5ku excellent comment
@@iMANC6ix6ix go visit a brain surgeon you need to, quickly
Need a GERMAN ownership model, enshrined in law like it is in Germany. 51% owned by supporters trusts.
A City fan complaining about the Owners 😂 oh the irony 🤣
You think Fulham fans actually live there?
McKola must have some good friends at Paddock judging by the fact he is still in these videos. Imagine saying all this stuff about Ratcliffe and Ineos just because they are trying to fix the problem.
“Pretends to be the man of the people, sacks everyone left, right and center… its not out debt”
“I can take or leave Antony being at Man Utd if it means ticket prices stay the same”
What a shallow analysis for someone who has a voice online.
So true
It's all PSR, we can't sell any player at a loss, that's why Antony stays, the fact that the glazers staggered payments over many years mean these poor signings from the football board can't be sold or they will be a recorded loss...we can't afford to offload any players that represent a loss, only players that are pure profit, like we did with mctom. And will likely do with one of Garnacho, Rashford or Mainoo...it's all PSR related...all the cuts at the club are ONLY because of FFP plus the lack of UCL and Adidas money
@@gregoryconran i dont mind seeing any of them leave for a good price and I know what you are saying. Maybe email that to Adam so he knows it too.
I wouldn’t dare pay 60 quid to watch United anymore we are shit now there isn’t 1 player in that squad that excites me. Why would fans want to pay more than 60 quid to watch zirkzee and Rasmus get bullied
Can we stop pretending that ticket prices are only £66. You have to buy a £35 membership to buy united tickets.
Ineos are so far removed from the fans. It's not just the local area. Fans travel from all around the UK , Ireland and the world to watch Utd. So bad they didnt consult the fans first amd explain x,y,z . Mind let's be real. No billionaire on the planet local born or not gives a monkeys about the every day person who either supports them or is employed by them. The glazers have dome such a bad job that Utd will pay the price for years and tears to come.
Again so called reds fans with poor information, Richard “ Dick Turpin “ Radcliffe is from Hull.
Ratcliff is just another Glazier..Ratcliff and Glaziers out and Qatar in...
Delusional mate
Funny af this is brought to you by sky
This guy Adam is highly negative and this bloke hardly find anything +ve with United. Also, he seems to believe that Rashford still deserves a chance in the team, after all the ruckus he had done. If you observe closely, all his issues mainly with the INEOS started after the Rasford fiasco.
This fake red brummie is as bad as fake gold bridge
If Sir Jim Likes Fulham, then he should move and buy Fulham FC and leave our club alone.
He ain't doing nothing wrong stop moaning bout the owners they ain't even the problem ffs
Have you been paid by INEOS. Lol@@BenWatkins-h5x
Football is about money full stop
Adam should have been a Liverpool fan loves a moan
Ineos and glazers out
Not sure the owners care about match going fans. Money is in streaming and touring around the world.
Might be a day a “home” game doesn’t mean anything anymore its just played in stadium/country who pays the most.
lol look at the united fan base screaming change, screaming for glazers out..then when a minority owner tries to make change by doing unpopular things the fan base starts to act like little cry baby 🐩’s
Exactly. We have been run like a charity with everyone leeching off our money we put into the club. David Gill, great as he was, was still getting £1 million+ a year salary after he left!
I support united i agree i wish people stfu
These utd fans are unbelievable.
Trying to be the peoples team now, give me a break!
Utd are just another corporate entity, just like city, Liverpool arsenal &co.
Great to see Scholes speaking up for the fans. Ineos are money grabbing Glazer supporters.
No they ain't
Ineos ruins the club.
I like Adam, but feels like he allows his emotions to get the better of him. Just because the changes they make feel wrong, doesn't mean they are. If you complain about the way they do thing's, then please at least present solutions that are the supposed "better alternatives".
Glazers and their Rat Get them all out
Sir Jim's is nothing but another Glazier.
Ratcliffe is full of Shit,simple,until clubs get the German model of Fan Ownership the problems will get worse.His Story of lifelong boyhood fan of United is Complete Nonsense,how many die hard United fans would own a Chelsea season ticket and try to buy the Club,seriously! All of his many sports ventures are mere Vanity projects.
Why is Adam calling him 'sir'? Didn't know he was a monarchist.
Everything has gone up. We been watching united for year for cheep. Ur a cheep skate all u want is cheep tickets and royalty football.
Who Jim Glazer paying off the debt on the club with the clubs money? Nothing new.
sad faces
He really isn’t though. Such a short sided argument
😅The only way forward was full sale but that was never ever gonna happen with the glazers greed
Full sale would have made little difference, as much as I still wish it happened.
We pay 20m interest on the clubs debt, that's not much, the dividends are also small.
By getting a full sale we would save only 30m a year maximum that we could spend, that's the only difference, yes they could spend on the stadium and women's team, but Newcastle are the richest club in the world yet they cant spend it for similar reasons, their owners and ours amortised forward, they bought players and pay them off over many years, but a player needs to be off the books for some time, ie paid off....before we can make a profit, and no profit means no sales unless they are pure profit like Garnacho and Rashford and Mainoo and like McTom was last season
The red flag was there before ineos completed their investment, they were willing to let the glazers stay, that is the red flag right there and the desperation of the fans decided to ignore it.
Keep seeing comments like this, the club didn't actually have a queue of buyers did they?
@redroobarb4562 because the glazers were being greedy and overpriced the club. They loaded the debt on the club, meaning the new owner had to inherit the debt. Thats why no one wanted to buy.
Ineos/Ratcliffe are Glazers light? I’d say they’ve made it even worse, even the Glazers weren’t this bad! 🤦🏻♂️
This is my surprised face that a tax dodging malicious billionaire is stripping back a well established outfit and punishing the people at the bottom to make more profit.
They're parasites.
I said it from the cusp of all this when it was announced the Glazers were possibly looking to sell. We should have done an ex player consortium that was backed by the entire UTD fan base via a subscription/fan union and cooperative type situation.
I'd have happily paid £100 a year or something to be a member of the fans union. Millions of other fans would be too, lots already pay for season tickets and UTD membership already to get tickets easier.
Moan United.
Rich folk dont understand reality
They don’t care about fans 🤬🤬🤬
They care u just live on the Internet its turnt people into knobs
Where are those fans now who were opposed to Qatar owning United. Lol. Ratcliffe Glazer simple as that.
Wheres Gary?
Hes too busy making money in the manc revamp so he's lost his tongue the hypocrite.
Jim wanted chelsea lets drop the "life long fan" waffle. Hes a glazer enabler.
Tbf I’m shocked anyone is surprised. Football is a political capitalist function. If you didn’t know this the blame is on you. A season long empty stadium will have this rhetoric changed in no time - but “you’re alright Jack”
We were told abt how ineos work & we didn’t hear. We had the chance to sell our team to someone who’s ready to pay of all our debt, and was ready to invest in our team yet they sold our team to another company who’re almost like glazer family..
what do you expect ?
I hear everything you say and I agree. The thing is, this club was never up for sale.
Glazers were looking for investment and never a full sale.
Elon Qatar
When a club is managed by businessman. No surprise at all.