The fact that they're testing this late in the programme tells me there's still issues with the jet and the UK MoD plan to invest into making it work the way it should do. tbh, I would of scrapped the F-35 and gone with either a naval Eurofighter or the Rafale. Not because I believe there's a huge difference in performance but simply because we would of at least had a jet that we were confident in.
"Would of" makes no sense whatsoever. "of" means that it belongs to something or someone, i.e., Queen OF Hearts, etc. I think you meant "would've" which is a contraction of "would have". (should have, would have, could have, etc.) You're welcome.
No, because in that sense "would" is the name of a person or an object, and it's tribe or what it's part of from is called "belonged". It makes no sense. But, it could've. It should've, and it would've, if you'd understood the concept of contractions ;)
Maybe you're right. I never needed to study English in any detail. It's just not needed for most aspects of life. I only have a secondary school level of English.
T's & P's multi country project they all do their bits Brough structural test centre one of the best in the world I speak from experience of working alongside aerospace engineers.
This video reminds me of one episode of the TV series Thundersbirds from the 1964. 👍😎
1:45 Looks like a a strange sad squid.
Simon Cowell each one costs about 90 million squids.
The fact that they're testing this late in the programme tells me there's still issues with the jet and the UK MoD plan to invest into making it work the way it should do. tbh, I would of scrapped the F-35 and gone with either a naval Eurofighter or the Rafale. Not because I believe there's a huge difference in performance but simply because we would of at least had a jet that we were confident in.
"Would of" makes no sense whatsoever. "of" means that it belongs to something or someone, i.e., Queen OF Hearts, etc. I think you meant "would've" which is a contraction of "would have". (should have, would have, could have, etc.) You're welcome.
Yes, the jet would of belonged to the British taxpayer. makes perfect sense.
No, because in that sense "would" is the name of a person or an object, and it's tribe or what it's part of from is called "belonged". It makes no sense. But, it could've. It should've, and it would've, if you'd understood the concept of contractions ;)
*You're welcome.
Maybe you're right. I never needed to study English in any detail. It's just not needed for most aspects of life. I only have a secondary school level of English.
I do find it strange that our American cousins can't test it state side. This is not not undermine the work from boys at Brough. Logistical nightmare
Its not strange at all that there are some things (indeed many things) we can do better than our American friends ...
T's & P's multi country project they all do their bits Brough structural test centre one of the best in the world I speak from experience of working alongside aerospace engineers.
Codify biokost continually healing matter AI challenges
How many Vulcan bombers could be made/maintained for the price of one of these?
This thing can do the same job as a Vulcan faster, stealthier and is actually able to defend itself.
petro1986 would like to see the day when a Vulcan can crack over 1200mph