BAE System Build Most Powerful Dreadnought Class Submarine for UK
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 มี.ค. 2021
- The Dreadnought class submarine will be the Royal Navy’s biggest, most powerful and most technically advanced submarines when they begin to enter service from the early 2030s and will play a pivotal role in the nation’s defence and security for decades to come. Work on the first two boats in the class is well underway at the Company’s shipyard in Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, with £2.5 billion worth of contracts have already been placed with suppliers across the UK.
Support our channel for more better contents by your subcribe bit.ly/38oPkox , Thank you very much.
HMS Agamemnon Attack Submarine British the most awaited th-cam.com/video/v41-5W9-5eQ/w-d-xo.html
This is what we in Australia need please talk with our government.
Australia needs Astute class attack sub.🇭🇲
You have such a massive coastline, cannot understand why your government would go for French diesel ones.😳
I think that they have changed their mind, to much up roars, from the Australian citizens.
Wayne Bridges I have visions of fuel tankers having to follow the subs around, therefore giving their positions away to the Chinese!!😄😄
What's the submarine equivalent of the Toyota Hilux? 😅
All commonwealth countrys will be protected by this class ...🇬🇸🇭🇲🇬🇧🇹🇨🇹🇦🇹🇻
English speaking world, no one else.
😂😂😂
U are miss Canada and gebrilta
@@williamevans-cg6vt Canada and Gibraltar will be too,. They have helped us a lot and we won't forget them , same with Chile
Good stuff... A union of confident and brilliant nations, open to working with and standing shoulder to shoulder with all who mean us well, but dangerous to our enemies... 👌
With these being built in my town it feels great to see these being transported down the street
As far as I’m concerned it’s money very well spent. Ok it’s expensive. But so is freedom
Its money which is driven into the private industry which builds it.
This will keep Putin at bay - but it doesn’t address the threat of voting in Fascio-Capitalistis like Trump
John Lenin lmao you’re funny. Nuclear weapons prevent super powers from entering into direct confrontations, so they use proxy wars and currency wars to blow off steam. This idea of Putin this or Trump that is just to scare you into reappropriating your tax dollars into the military industrial complex under the fear of attack in order to maintain tech advancements.
That absolutely right but the worry is would a Labour government agree?
Yup, just ask the Ukranians
It’s absolutely stunning! Britain has always fought with quality and always triumphed over quantity.
German navy of WWI and WWII would like to disagree
@@thomaszhang3101 Germany lost both. Some argument they could put forward 🤷🏻♂️
@@nathanberriman4330 mainly in that Germany had more effective ships but less of them. Therefore, Britain had also fought with quantity and triumphed over quality.
@@thomaszhang3101 Britain has been ruling the seas for centuries dating back to 1400’s and you want to discredit the an unbreakable record on the back of a single piece of conflict where we still won? - This is called ‘reaching’ in our language.
This guys referring to how the German U-boats during the war when first introduced were completely un-matched, uboats had total domination of the season, destroying any ship they came across for years, this almost won the Germans the war because of them destroying supply ships and causing mass starvation, the british invented early radar systems to catch these U-boats and after that was introduced, U-boats became underwater coffins - German crews of uboats were so unlikely to survive their missions German commanders told them to "just come home alive" at the start of their missions
It's B-A-E systems not 'bae' systems.
It is now a meme because it is bae.
exactly. And it’s FEET and INCHES in maritime law. Nobody uses Metres to describe a ship’s length.
Stopped watching as soon as a military focussed channel said Bae!
@@henryviii6341 depends where you are I guess. I am in the maritime sphere and majority of the world use metric terms to describe vessel dimensions. USA still uses Ft and inches however.
text to speech may sound more human but you can still tell.
Can not wait to see the 4 subs, Dreadnought, Valiant, Warspite, and King George VI, finished sometime after 2030. They look like they will be real monsters
Vlad the Invader has proved to us that these subs are needed.
Congratulations with this very nice new sub @Brits! Greetings from your neighbours the Netherlands.
Greetings peterprm19ify! We aren't just your neighbours we are your friends.
Never met a Dutch person I didn’t like. Love from Nottingham
@ classic formula greetings to you 👍
Greetings from a fellow F1 fan
Netherlands are britians brothers
It should be shameful that and island nation cannot produce its own steel for such programs
This isn't any old steel. It's specialist steel. No nation can do everything.
Yes read my post thatcher regime did this to the nation amongst starting a war in the Falklands for political gain 👎 she closed to this great nation down sold off everything to foreign cheep labour 🤝 she started that culture and your right nothing left ⚰️🇬🇧
@@tonytotten408 Grammar is your friend. So is correct spelling.
The UK government have now acquired Sheffield Forgemasters to make sure we can source this steel ourselves.
we can do it cant we? ew just put the offer out to a few company and went for the best priced?
I hope the French Don't use the same steel as they use on the Citroën... lol
God bless United Kingdom 🇬🇧🙏
lol your god is dead
@@markcooke5270 I entirely agree well said.
And the naysayers and general British armed forces poo pooers should keep their mouths firmly closed...... we're back!!
These Dreadnought Class submarines are absolutely stunning, they will be the envy of many many Navies from all over the World. Trident 2 is the best tool for the job and I'm pleased that we've renewed it and that we'll continue to work closely with our best military Ally on this programme. 🇬🇧🇺🇸✌✌
@Bobo Mbutu utter crap your talking
@Bobo Mbutu China is Trash and Russia has a low militaty budget based on the fact it has a lot of nukes. shut up.
@Bobo Mbutu unlikely
@@Marvin-dg8vj sorry about that previous post meant to reply to this doubter bobo
@Bobo Mbutu china builds qantity over quality and russia is still using a mostly heavily obselete navy and has zero working aircraft carriers
Nukes are very expensive but no country has tried to invade since we've had them, it's a price worth paying as the deterrent works.
Except only 5 million middle easterners and North Africans have invaded in the last 20 years.
Well now that’s all changed
@@Edbatport62 No it hasent ! poo tin knows very well if he attacks this country within minutes armageddon wil be on its way to his beloved Russia !!
UK needs at least 10 Astute class subs.
Why 10 ?
design's for Astute Classes replacement has recently started.
The more the merrier...perhaps we could lease two or three to the Aussies?
Absolutely amazing," British Engineering at its Best".
Rather, US engineering and BAE incompetance. This yard has not built its own boats since the T class and (with MoD help) Trident.
@johnbull1899 you can litterally go to barrow and see them being built.
I have seen the outline of HMS Dreadnought in steel and been on HMS Anson. They are impressive.
Have they rolled the steel for the outer shells yet,,
Is it like the original cgi's? I.e. with a flat top profile? I've just been watching some info on chinese subs and their new "submarine history museum". I found it a bit ironic considering their subs in general, although it's concerning the technology they are putting into their newer ones.
@@sparkiegaz3613 this was in early 2018 and they were just cutting the steel. I a, sure it is well advanced now.
@phil stabler which part?
They are pathetic given what was intended to have been built in the 1990s.
These are the type of subs Australia needs, plus the nukes.
You don't need these, they are huge, over twice the size of SSNs, and designed to deliver thermonuclear weapons. Astute, or equivalent, is what is required. I wouldn't be surprised if the UK based a couple of Astutes in Oz until you have your own; building SSNs is serious engineering, it will take at least a decade for Oz to be in a position to build their own hulls and Oz will have to get the reactors built in USA or UK.
@@glynnwright1699 You may be right, but if Russia takes out England , whilst siding with China, it will still leave us behind. The senora's for war always change, that how attackers have won in history. The only certainty in history is war, peace only last for a generation at most.
You don’t need these. For the price of 4 of these subs and the nukes to go with them you could buy 8 Astute class and a fleet of 100 F-35As.
@@glynnwright1699 You're spot on. Aussie Nuclear submarines most likely won't be ready till the 2040s. The AUKUS deal stipulates that the UK and the US will lease their nuclear submarines to shore up the Australian submarine service for when the Collins Class submarines start to retire in the 2030s.
The ocean is fast and deep still big enough for larger submarines.
Credible thermonuclear deterrence is always the first priority of national security.
Replying to your comment in August 2022, 6 months after Russia invaded Ukraine after promising to protect them if they gave up their Nuclear Arsenal, which Ukraine did.
Oscar, you are so correct.
Peace - through superior firepower. Alternatively, to maintain Peace, walk softly and carry a big stick.
Have a nice one, my regards...
After Ukraine there's no such thing as nuclear deterrence.
🇺🇸👁️🇷🇺
@@truthhurts9241 Russia was also given security guarantees. NATO has treated Russia and Ukraine like fools. Have a nice day Truth Hurts.
🇺🇸👁️🇷🇺
@@craftpaint1644 As regards Nuclear deterrence, of course it works, Russia has not been blitzed by Ukrainian rockets for fear of a Russian (Soviet) Nuclear response.
As for treating people as fools, this is the second time Russia (The new embryonic Soviet Empire) has attacked a peaceful neighbour. It's a damned land and resources grab just like the 1941 Nazi "Special Military Operation" to rescue the Russian People from Stalin's Communism.
I think we all can see through bull-"sugar" thank you.
NATO has not gone to war (Conducted a Special Military Operation) against Russia because if it had then this situation would all have been over last April.
Security Guarantees? Hitler gave them as well, didn't work out very well back then did it?
We should keep the Vanguard's as well and have 8 Nuclear Subs rather than 4
Will keep them for some time I guess but 1 or 2 of them are basically past their time now so need retiring
BAe Systems should give credit to its many major subcontractors, without whom no submarines would ever have been built in Barrow.
As have worked for them in Glasgow i appreciate this haha 👍
Spot on.. Hats off to all these guys who should get far more recognition than they do.
They are our best friends and worst enemies rolled into one
Impressive boat.👍
As an Aussie, I only hope we follow the path of the Astute class for the Aukus Subs. They are a formidable weapon system.
That is a gorgeous submarine!
Nice
AI voice overs have improved a lot
Frankly speaking, UK should build at least 8-9, 4-5 of them being already converted to SSGNs / special ops - far more useful.
Now you are talking! Absolutely agree!
We can’t operate 4-5 of them at once, we literally have 1 sub out we don’t have the submariners to operate them
Yo, what text to voice tool do you use? Sounds very good
How is it a US designed reactor if it’s by Rolls Royce?
Us design built by rolls Royce
Design and associated technology development is different than build and manufacturing (under license).
Because Rolls Royce bought the US company....
@@alanhutchins5916 You are thinking of PW Allison. It's not the same
Dreadnought Class will be the first to use the British PWR-3 (Mark 3 Reactor Version).
"PWR3 was a new system "based on a US design but using UK reactor technology". The Royal Institution of Naval Architects reported that it was likely that the UK was given access to the US Navy S9G reactor design used in their Virginia-class submarines. The PWR3 was a simpler and safer design with a longer life and lower maintenance requirements than the PWR2 variants and cost roughly the same as the PWR2b. The PWR3 has 30% less parts compared to the PWR2."
*Don't worry we share are technology with America also, there is actually a BAE Systems manufacturer in the USA that makes the Pump-jet Propulsion for the Virginia Class and previously the Seawolf Class. They also make the VPM module the Virginia Class.
The British live on an Island they need a big navy and a modern one. Dont penny pinch because things can change in a heart beat and the UK may need its Navy too defend her homeland again.
These missiles will never be used because if they were there would be no UK left to defend.
Its B. A. E Systems, not "Bae" Systems. Do you call the USAF the U-SAF?
British aerospace engineering (Bae)
Make our Great Royal Navy even stronger great news for the U.K
Reminds me of the boats in 2012
8 nuke for mosow will be prefect. i think that will do the Job.
but you may get 30 back which really would do the job as far as the UK and Northern Europe is concerned.
96 nuclear warheads per submarine,..... DAMN!!
Australia today announced that we are looking forward to the future of nuclear power submarines between America the United Kingdom and Australia to be built for the Australian people yes Australia is getting nuclear capability submarines, an about bloody time.
Nuclear subs are for the big boys .
Britain is not under immediate threat under almost any scenario .Not the same for Australia
@CHRISTIAN KNIGHT I am agreeing with you.Australia needs these nuclear subs and Britain will always be closely tied to Australia
@CHRISTIAN KNIGHT
How is Austrialia 'essentially British territory,?
Utter, utter tosh
@@adamdriver1016 lol he didn't say it was. your an independent county, but if CANZUK come out we would be a union
@@Marvin-dg8vjwhere the greatest fighting men in the world1 and weve got the best engineers
We need more of these, If i'm going to die i want everyone else to follow me, If there stupid enough to us Nukes...
1:11 When opening all those micile hatches, won't seawater begin rushing in?
Meaning that only a few hatches can be opened, or the sub will loose buoyancy.
No
just no lol. Read up on submarine displacement systems and its payload delivery methods, that will make sense of everything.
“It’s better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt”
No fella, rather than me writing loads to explain it why don't you have a little Google session on how it all works. Don't feel silly for asking though mate, if you don't know, you don't know.
@@hangarrat Not always. Quite frequently it's better to be honest, open your mouth, and ask a serious question. And in no wise can a man be thought a fool because he's not familiar with submarine missile launching methods.
Ok ... so what are the Astute Class subs .... I don`t get it?
‘Bay Systems’, rarely have l heard such bo11ox!
It’s B… A… E….. not Bae…. It ain’t your girlfriend
I think the voice is automated from text
Normally as a Brit I would say this would never be built. As the Tempest vapour ware. However if we want to keep our seat at the UN Security Council Table we need this. It will be built, manned and never used.
If it's never used then it's justified it's expense. Peace through strength
@@k2apache60 Agreed.
What does ' vapour ware ' suppose to mean, presumably some bullshit or other and what exactly do you mean by " it will never be used" ? Yeah, you better hope !
@@nickmazz9345 It will never be built and they know it. Just a lie - ie "Vapourware" a stunning presentation about cutting edge products that will never be built. The Tempest is a push for development pounds to keep BAE ticking over till. TSR2 was more real.
@@Boric78 My understanding is that F35s are already being cancelled in anticipation of the Tempest. As for the sub........The Trafalgar class was built, the Astute class has been built, the Vanguard class was built: there's no sensible reason to imagine these subs won't be built.
The normal crusty tree huggers will bleat about the nuclear deterrent but the fact is, they are the ultimate insurance policy for peace and security. Yes, they're expensive but what price do you put on your own Country's safety and security? The fact is, no nuclear armed Country has ever gone to war with another nuclear armed Country, that should tell you all you need to know.
🇬🇧🇬🇧✌✌
Spot on.
Almost agree, but didn't Pakistan and India go to war time and again? Both nuclear armed!
It's wrong. Pakistan and India clashed in 1999 (Kargil War) and the two countries had nuclear weapons for a long time.
@@comicmania2008 I would not call that a war, but they have indeed both involved in conflict. It's Mutually Assured Distraction notion that stops these countries from annihilating eachother. It's weird I agree but I have to admit its been working well.
well said.
Can't listen to that. Find a human.
HMS baewatch
Yay
For The UK this was expensive but a good investment. England can maintain its own nuclear deterrent and its own foreign policy.
Absolutely agree...We need to show that the UK can paddle its own canoe further and faster than most.
I liked the old Hal
Bridges, yes 2 for them and 2 for us.
"a total displacement of 17,200t, Almost as heavy as your mum"
Are we that fked that we enjoy these world ending machines.
76 years and no world wars. I'd say these magnificent beasts should be heralded as the game changers they were.
They keep wars from ever happening
The Fear Nothing Class of Submarines, but in old English it's called the Dreadnought: Dread: = Fear and Nought: = 0 or Nothing, it's actually pronounced up North as Nout, as in “their ain't nought wrong with me”, accept me being crazy enough to bother explaining this to everyone even English people.
Not a bad video but a lot of repeat video and computer graphics just seem to be on loop no new footage??
'BAY Systems' ooooh please! 🤣 Lose the digital voice over.
This makes tyrants like putin think twice
Anglo Saxons are tyrants,
We just ordered 8 of those....
Who is we?
@@rossmonty1911 Steve and his wife, I can only presume.
New Warspite
Sounds like they are already gearing toward cutting it to 3 units, only instead of 4
won't happen, 4 units have been named and 4 reactors are being built. long lead items have to be ordered now to be ready in 10-15 years. 4 reactor cores are being constructed.
@@aaranbutton516 ya 3 operational boats ,plus all the spares stored a shore ready to use
I can reasonably guarantee we aren't.
@@Dan-qg1bq ya probably down to just 2 units constructed and a complete set of spares, would make up the 3rd one
@@jonathantarrant2449 yeah, that's not correct
Is the PWR3 design by the US, I though that all the reactors in that series from the PWR2 were designed in the UK but based off a US design?
So how is this not falling into the “too valuable to lose” category?
Well, THESE subs are going to be used at most only once anyway, so.... a success is when they are peacefully decomissioned long after designed life span.
With the names of Valiant and Warspite, trouble don't come looking for them, they go looking for trouble.
How long ??
With the new under water drones that are being tested ,the expensive subs will soon be out of date .
This may be one of the last classes of manned subs
How many Dreadnought Class submarines will have the Royal Navy?
It’s B.A.E systems. Not ‘bay’ systems 🤦♂️
People argue against projects like this because of the gargantuan cost of them . And they are right to in a way ! I dont agree but I can see the logic . Whilst in the last 12 months or so the british government has spent 400 billion at least to basically pay people not to work ! Now wheres the logic in that?
I hope and pray the Dreadnoughts never fire in anger as they frighten the life out of me just looking at them.
like the Akula/Typhoon...
a beauty not for fighting a war...
...but ending it.
If they kept British Steelin Teesside running we'd be laughing as we made the best steel
Considering plumbing competence in uk...i would not highlight how many kilometers of piping they got ..its not really a selling point outside uk.. uk plumbing is seen as good as french electrical circuits...
And by the way mr youtube it's not ''minister of defence'' it is ''secretary of state for defence'' and it's not ''bay'' it's BAE
Ministry Of Defence, the AI voice that seems to be getting confused.
Will this be a sub-astute for the other British submarines?
Astute Class is a 'Nuclear Powered /Attack Submarine' (SSN),
Dreadnought Class is a 'Nuclear Powered / Ballistic Missile Submarine' (SSBN)
*Dreadnought Class will replace the Vanguard Class submarines that are in service at the moment.*
@@englishmisfit9881 It was a joke, buddy....🙄
@@igg3937 makes no sense.
India should be deal soon final
I hope this boat's ultra "silent" or its useless. (a quiet sub will trail it and pop it before it can launch it's first weapon)
Too many useless Ads in a short video...nktTH-cam
AdGuard bro
Why the reduction from 16 to 12 missiles?
Saves money and provides extra space for living quarters and other crew morale enhancements.
perhaps 12 with the corresponding number of incoming missiles is just about enough to destroy the planet, don't want to over do it.
It's pronounced B.A.E Systems and not Bay Systems?!
To be ready, in the 2030s.....sometime... Source...RN, UKdefencejournal....
Grammar! Where do these videos originate?
Money well spent!
Need a 5th. Trust me, we need a 5th boat.
1 Out on patrol
1 Standing by
1 in short term maintenance
1 in repairs
Another is an extra £10 billion and no crew, never used
Narrated by a computer I’m guessing.
Hang on aren't they still building the astute class sub?
They are still improving and building the astute submarine,
the dreadnought is a future replacement for the vanguard submarine.
They're also working on the preliminary design of the Astute replacement
@@thozz ok cool thanks
@@williamhutchinson7 there's only 2 left to build matey.
@@danglingdave1787 ahh nice thank you
6:31
I can't help but wonder if the recent AUKUS agreement, pulling an enormous French submarine sale from under their nose, will alter the availability of said specialized French steel.
you should always keep it in the family
Cheap compared to brexit, this has a point, and it creates jobs.
Nonetheless we work professionally with what we have.
Robot voices are getting better or talking heads are getting worse.
Build a million submarines
is this the nuclear missile sub?
we also need a bunch of AIP subs. UAVs are where its at under water. Vidar-7 looks rather attractive and a larger number at smaller cost would totally increase parallel deployments.
Royal Navy don't use SSK , we use SSN instead choosing Nuclear power/Pump-jet propulsion technology over Diesel/Electric or Stirling AIP/propeller Propulsion technology ...
VIDAR-7 and VIDAR-36 are only concepts designs by BMT Group ltd non has been made or proven & tested.
The problem with AIP subs is their range is very limited. With nuclear boats range is unlimited. Truly a great deterrent.
Ministry of Defence not Minister. Also what is bae systems?..its B.A.E.
You cany but a price on protecting your country from foreign aggression
European nuclear deterrence (in this case France & the U.K.) has always been important given the threat from, in the past the Soviet Union & now Russia. There has always been a whispering within the NATO alliance that America cannot be depended upon to come to Europe’s defense in the event of an invasion from Russia. The current U.S. President/Vice President is indeed such the case. That’s why Russia is in Ukraine. Teddy Roosevelt coined the phrase: Speak softly but carry a big stick. So true.
Let's not forget only a few decades ago the USA drew up plans to attack Britain. Sure we are allies now, but that can change if we ever refuse one of their demands. This special alliance always has felt more one sided than a true alliance.
why do they need to replace...?? ehy not just simply bend chyna and ryski over and upgrade...?
💷💷💷💷💷💷💰💰💰💶💴💴💴💷
Lol sailor middle finger 2:02
These submarines are expensive but without them Britain would be vulnerable to bigger aggressive countries like Russia and China.
Those countries always will have these undetectable stealth nuclear deterrents in the back of their minds when talking and dealing with Britain.
Without this deterrent i dread the cost to Britain.
Who on earth is "bay systems"? Do you mean BAE, a shortened form of British Aerospace
The end of us all, if ever used.
As for independent, well perhaps, as long as America allows.
America allows what?
@@englishmisfit9881 He doesn't know, obviously.
@@1977ajax ... A lot of people think because the UK have a contract for sale of UGM-133 Trident II ballistic missile module from the USA that they have legal rights in how we use them (retarded), even though the nuclear warhead inside is also made in UK at the Atomic Weapons Establishment.
During the Falklands War American President Ronald Reagan suggested to UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher that they give up on the Falkland Islands and let the Argentine's have it to avoid conflict.
Well history showed what British people thought of that cowardice suggestion.
A frightening machine. It is a shame that people think we need nuclear weapons pointed at each other though.
Money