What Goes Into a Sacrament? Form and Matter (Aquinas 101)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 27

  • @angelicashen
    @angelicashen ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I cannot agree more. I remembered once when I was on my trip to Latvia and it happened to be a Sunday. There was only one Catholic church offering English mass so I attended. It was a very small church with few simple sacramental elements, no incense(which is my favourite), no alter service and no organ. Chants were accompanied by guitar. The feeling was just…strange. I will never doubt if this kind of a simple mass has equally sacramental efficacy for sure. However it was that moment I realised physical elements were spiritually helpful and had such the privilege in my parish was a gift that I should always feel gratitude.

  • @jonathankane2278
    @jonathankane2278 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    A question occurred to me while listening to this: What if the priest is deaf or mute and can't speak. Would sign language constitute valid words for a sacrament?

    • @liraco_mx
      @liraco_mx ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Good question (since my understanding was that these would constitute impediments to becoming a priest but unsure of the case if it happens after ordination)

    • @john-paulgies4313
      @john-paulgies4313 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      St. Isaac Jogues had to ask the Pope for a dispensation to say Mass because the Iroquois had chewed off his canonical digits and he could no longer licitly hold the Body of Christ for consecration. Of course, the Pope was more than willing, but the dispensation was needed for him to use other fingers.
      In the case of the mute person, though, it might be impossible to grant a dispensation....

    • @anthonyw2931
      @anthonyw2931 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This would be a good #AskAFriar

    • @toddpund5761
      @toddpund5761 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seriously? I'm sure they have requirements...I will ask our priest however..

  • @sopad4629
    @sopad4629 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    So complicated father. So many things to remember.

  • @Raven-zr8gm
    @Raven-zr8gm ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amen Thanks be to god 🙏✝️

  • @liraco_mx
    @liraco_mx ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video, great accent too.

  • @zzc8505
    @zzc8505 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I started reading Summa Theologiae. Lots of interesting ideas, but not enough direct scriptural references. E.g., his ideas about the nature of angels and such are very detailed, but those details are not found in scriptures, or did I miss them?... What did Aquinas base his ideas and conclusions on?... Is there a work and/or expository type of book that demonstrates how he proceeds directly from a specific biblical verse/chapter?... Could you please provide sources?

  • @luluq01
    @luluq01 ปีที่แล้ว

    #AskAFriar
    Sending my question here since it is a little long. I have often wondered how Mary is shown to us as an example to emulate. However, Mary is the Immaculate Conception. Being that she is free of original sin, her intellect and will was not clouded or in error since she was not weighted down by the consequence of original sin. How can we possibly aspire to that when we are constantly weighted down by sin?
    Also, our original parents before the fall, also enjoyed this privilege and were in constant communication with God. How then would they ever choose anything but God?
    Thank you

    • @toddpund5761
      @toddpund5761 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably using the sacraments that God gave us like confession to remove mortal and venial sins. If you are constantly weighed down by sin, you have serious issues. Some of the saints were sinners before they became saints! How, using the sacraments that Christ provided for us. They couldn't have been in CONSTANT communication with God, that's crazy. How do I know? The serpent weasled is way in. If they were in constant contact, he never would have got in. Wow

    • @luluq01
      @luluq01 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@toddpund5761 Thank you for taking the time to respond. Still, at the time of our first parents and even at the time of Mary, there were no sacraments. Due to the fall, our default position is to be weighted down by the inclination to sin. We are disordered and our intellect and will clouded. Yes, we are helped by grace and the sacraments. Still, I would like a response from one of the friars on this. Thank you so much.

    • @toddpund5761
      @toddpund5761 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@luluq01 no problem, I understand your question a little better be an interesting answer if there is one.

  • @pawelwysocki1581
    @pawelwysocki1581 ปีที่แล้ว

    At the creation of the world God breathed His spirit into man. He did not do that with animals or plants.
    For St. Thomas the necessity to be consistent with Aristotle produced the concept of "animal soul" (its form). But that puts Aristotle above the Word of God - probably unknowingly, since it's a subtle matter.
    To be clear, I value Thomas immensely as a Saint. My only reservations have to do with his philosophy. If everything has a form, but only human beings have souls, then maybe the Form and the Soul aren't the same thing.
    (I know St. Thomas tried to find a walk-around by saying that only the human soul is immortal. It seems this leaves a lot of people confused.)
    God bless!

    • @zzc8505
      @zzc8505 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, he did. Do your research, look up original Hebrew words and you'll have your answer regarding God breathing life into animals.

    • @pawelwysocki1581
      @pawelwysocki1581 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zzc8505 I was thinking about that, actually - "the breath of life" and animals referred to as "living creatures".
      On the other hand in verse 19 animals are "formed out of the ground", but there's no mention of God breathing life into them. The noun "breath" (Hebrew "ruah") is the same one used for example to refer to the sending of the Holy Spirit. And for human beings their spirit is their soul.
      I think there's a lot of significance to the fact that the "breath of life" is not mentioned in verse 19.

  • @sethapex9670
    @sethapex9670 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I'm sorry "dog's soul"? Doesn't the church teach that only humans have an immortal soul?

    • @adllllla
      @adllllla ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Humans have immortal souls. Creatures have souls but they are not immortal.

    • @kharismabaptiswan1754
      @kharismabaptiswan1754 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      According to Catholic philosophy, plants have vegetative soul, animals have animal soul, and humans have rational soul. God bless

    • @anthonyw2931
      @anthonyw2931 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kharismabaptiswan1754 well put

    • @anthonyw2931
      @anthonyw2931 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adllllla it's not a certainty that creatures and plants don't have immortal souls, but it is certain that human souls are immortal "God's breathe"

    • @pawelwysocki1581
      @pawelwysocki1581 ปีที่แล้ว

      At the creation of the world God breathed His spirit into man. He did not do that with animals or plants.
      For St. Thomas the necessity to be consistent with Aristotle produced the concept of "animal soul" (its form). But that puts Aristotle above the Word of God - probably unknowingly, since it's a subtle matter.
      God bless!

  • @andrewortiz5797
    @andrewortiz5797 ปีที่แล้ว

    Many native American use Peyote cactus buttons as A Religious Sacrament. Peyote is a sacred medicine that causes visions and Spiritual Experiences. Even Catholic missionaries tried the Peyote Sacrament and they too reported religious Ecstasy and visions of The Blessed Virgin etc .

  • @WolfIshElm
    @WolfIshElm ปีที่แล้ว

    what in the cult is this. why am i getting ads for this. I'm Nazarene but watching some creepy guy on my screen isn't cool.