Ek question hai.. Yeh expand to nahi hoga yeh samaj aa gaya.. Lekin mera ek aur question hai.. Yaha par conjugation ban raha hai kyu ki cyclo propane k 1st carbon par (+) charge hai. Lekin agar propane-cyclopropyl structure hota aur (+) charge ring se 2nd carbon par hota to ring expansion hota? Kyu ki iss condition mai to conjugation bhi nahi banta??
through spectroscopy it was found tht the actual bond angle is 102 degree and from mathematical formula.... sp^x is 1 + xcos(thetha) = 0 so by putting 102 degree we get x ~ 4.8 ie 5 which gives hybridization of carbon in CPM to be 5 .....Sir what do u think now?
Did you find any reason for this? Man sometimes I feel like as the law for physics is every action has equal reaction so the law for chemistry is every reaction has different explanations 😅
Thank you sir so much, aapne teesri aakh khol di 😂
Underrated channel man
bhaisaab bhaia kya mst xplain kia h ek dum jhakas
hatsoff to such a knowledge in depth
Thanks sir... Real helpful and great explanation!
Ek question hai.. Yeh expand to nahi hoga yeh samaj aa gaya.. Lekin mera ek aur question hai.. Yaha par conjugation ban raha hai kyu ki cyclo propane k 1st carbon par (+) charge hai. Lekin agar propane-cyclopropyl structure hota aur (+) charge ring se 2nd carbon par hota to ring expansion hota? Kyu ki iss condition mai to conjugation bhi nahi banta??
Thank you sir.
Your explanation cleared my doubts.. Thanks alot. Wish you more knowledge....
Great explanation
Thanku you very much sir Even my coaching teacher couldn't explain me out even though he to knew th concept but you helped me to understand it
Just a amazing explanation ♥️
Nice Explanation Sir 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Very well explained sir
Which is more stable CPM or Tropylium ion?
Almost equal but to be exact tropylium is more stable
Very heplful sir
Thank you very much 💖
Thank you so much i got it crystal clr
Thanks👍
through spectroscopy it was found tht the actual bond angle is 102 degree and from mathematical formula....
sp^x is 1 + xcos(thetha) = 0 so by putting 102 degree we get x ~ 4.8 ie 5 which gives hybridization of carbon in CPM to be 5 .....Sir what do u think now?
Yes same case as in SN2 intermediate
Close to sp4 because of the increased p-character.
Did you find any reason for this? Man sometimes I feel like as the law for physics is every action has equal reaction so the law for chemistry is every reaction has different explanations 😅
Okey sir. L...got the point
Thanks for supporting 🙏 sir
Is miscellaneous carbocation and cpm carbocation are same?
cpm is more stable then aromatic?
what will happen if there is a substitution in ring system like ch3
Being a student of chemistry dancing resonance was never heard by me.
I got angry whenever I hear dancing resonance word... As it is wrong🤣
No dancing resonance makes cpm carbocation more stable