This is the 1st interview that i can respect from the interviewer n interviewee. Thankyou for remaining open n respecting the justice system n the defendant being innocent until proven guilty in the court of law!
Everyone deserves a fair trial to guarantee their constitutional rights are upheld... like unlawful search and seizure, being allowed to not talk unless they can get a lawyer etc.....but it absolutely gets my blood boiling when a defendant is very obviously guilty but the Defense Attorney tries to get that pertinent evidence excluded so the jury doesn't get to find out about it, or the Defense Attorney tries to cast blame on someone else just to try to get at least one juror to have a doubt. I just feel like if the defendant is guilty their attorney should only be allowed to make sure their rights aren't violated...but they still have to take a guilty plea Edit* for everyone in the comments telling me that it's the defense's job to get their client off because an innocent person shouldn't go to jail. YES I know this. When I say 100 percent guilty, I'm saying DNA evidence, witness, video evidence, digital trail etc, not just a feeling the person is guilty....but even with all these things, some defense attorneys still try to get their client off. I think that's bs
@@scorpion-lg4ic completely agree with you. I believe what you describe is exactly what was intended in the constitution. It was never about using the system to get a guilty person off. Sadly many seem to think that’s an acceptable approach for defense lawyers to take.
His position should not be to discredit evidence. It should be an attempt to get kohberger the best possible deal. Plead guilty, because we all know you did it, or get proven guilty and hang.
I have seen the police blame an innocent man for a crime that he didn't commit. It was a horrible crime that he could have received life in prison, or more likely gotten the death penalty if he had been convicted. I called the FBI and explained to them why I knew that they had the wrong gut, and why I believed that I had seen the man who had run away from the crime scene moments after it happened. It ruined this guy's life, and destroyed his reputation. The allegations of fake evidence that law enforcement officials drummed up about him were repeated by the media, and caused me to be genuinely paranoid and fearful of law enforcement for years. This man had saved hundreds of lives at the crime scene. It gave people a false since of security, prevented law enforcement from investigating to find the real perpetrator, and it gave the man the opportunity to carry out more mass murder. I have no evidence that the Idaho law enforcement officials have falsely accused this man for killing these college students. But the students at the college, and other people in the community are comfortable now that the police have arrested and charged this man for the crime. I just want to make up my mind after I see all of the evidence that they have against him and his defense. The prosecution has the burden of proof. The last thing I want to see is an innocent man get convicted and-or the murder go free.
Let's ask Michael Morton, Ronald Cotton, and Juan Catalan if wrongful convictions can occur. The case here looks strong, and I hope that a fair trial secures the conviction of the guilty party.
@@ow3wells yes... they are going to have a field day with him... I'm sure he will go to Max and in there they are in their for life and most don't care... he is going to be someone girl friend within a week of being there. Also yes they may give him vegan food but let's be real they most likely don't truly honor that request... that and it's loud people are screaming acting crazy... he is in for a treat lol...
@@bripearce45 he’ll have a buffet of Vegan penis served upon the hour in jail. All he can eat no doubt. Although Idaho has the death penalty in the cards for this POS
What could be worse than simply assuming a person was guilty, convicting them wrongfully and letting the real offender prowl around out there to possibly murder again? None of us would be safe without good defense lawyers.
Yes we absolutely do need good defense attorneys! People are accused of falsely of crimes everyday by police and prosecutors out of vengeance, overzealousness for re-election purposes , tunnel vision, etc It happens every day and I know many who have been a victim. I personally believe BK to be an absolute monster & guilty and I assume there will be plenty of actual evidence to tie him to the crime, but that doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a fair trial.
@@veronicasavage1182innocent people do go to jail. Not saying this guy is innocent. But just reminding you so you understand why there needs to be fair trial
Not guilty does not mean innocent. Has OJ found who murdered his wife and Ron Goldman? Do the police consider it a cold case? Are they still looking for the murderer? 9:25 I heard Dershowitz recently accuse police of planting evidence in that case.
I've lived near Moscow Idaho my whole life. (Local news and officials refer to this area as "the quad-cities.) In my experience the reason defense attorneys here give for waving a speedy trial and putting it off for months and months is to get public attention and opinion to die down so they can eventually work out a plea agreement with the prosecution. In this case I would consider that to be a futile attempt considering it's so high profile, but also, the defendant strikes me as more inclined to go to trial to prove his innocence than he is to take a plea deal. (This is not a comment about his innocence or guilt.)
From what I heard on another channel, the prosecution has hinted that the only plea deal that they might consider would be to take a guilty plea in exchange for life in prison without the possibility of parole and take the death penalty off the table. They are not plea bargaining down to something like a guilty plea for 20-30 years with the possibility of parole after 15 years or something like that. The parents of some of the victims have publicly stated that they want nothing less than the death penalty but they realize that not everyone is in favor of the death penalty so they would accept life in prison without the possibility of parole as a possible compromise with the families of the other victims who might not want a death sentence but that’s as far as they’re budging. I don’t think that in six months the parents who are strongly for the death penalty will have changed their minds about that. If anything the six month delay will give them more time to have experienced without their children who they miss dearly and it might make them want to see the death sentence (or life without parole) handed down that much more. I think just based upon the evidence that they’ve already revealed that they have in the probable cause affidavit alone, the prosecution feels strongly about their case and are confident in their chances at trial. Of course they haven’t gone through the discovery period yet in order to see what evidence Kohberger’s attorney has, so in going through the discovery period if his attorney can produce some exculpatory evidence, that might make them change their tune. I would imagine that the only thing that would cause them to want to deal is some kind of iron clad alibi that he was hundreds of miles away at the time of the murders or something else irrefutable to prove that it couldn’t have been him. Anything short of that is going to see this case go to trial.
@@beautifulsurprise9424 I totally agree with you very well said. I think if it were a piece of some of what they have then no. But for them to explain the sheath. Why would it even be in a bed. Also the pings matching cameras on the very street ya that plays so those who think pings r not good enough to put him there more then once is crazy in itself. Plus at the girls job having words with them n other employees there enough to make them afraid and write in their POS system about him. Plus the fact he cleans his car and changes plates to add a plate. I mean such lame things that they are using as evidence actually in a whole are great to show he did these crimes. And I don't think you can wash blood from clothes or from cars upholstery and they haven't even said anything about weather anything showed up in the car. And to me he seems the type to wear vans just saying. If he doesn't have more then one pair seriously like a phone college kids love their vans . It's slum dunk in my opinion.
@@beautifulsurprise9424 If I had to guess, BK probably would prefer the death penalty. He has been tortured in his own mind for most of his life, it appears. He figures...go out in a big way. So devastating.😥
In cases like this that attorney's ONLY job is to delay as much and as long as possible to keep their client alive and off of death row for another day.
Honestly their is nothing wrong with a defense attorney defending their client. It’s quite fascinating to see what the defense will come up with to combat the prosecutions evidence. Everyone has the right to a presumption of innocence until proven guilty and a way to follow that right is to give the accused legal representation to help fight any accusation.
Ms. Levy is reminding me that presentation of evidence is the life force. I have strong feelings regarding this case. The lives of these victims and their manner of death is overwhelming. I have pure compassion for the lives of the parents, friends and families of these tragic souls. God help us all!
This is a great interview. The way people have attacked, ridiculed, mocked this man who has not even been proven guilty is absolutely shocking. I hope he sues everyone. This is the culture in America. If you are different, you are attacked and assumed guilty by looks alone. Thank you for this interview.
How is it looking bad for the prosecution? It rarely ever looks this good for the prosecution. How often do they have a random item left next to the victim with dna? That is on top of all of the circumstantial evidence that we know about from one affidavit. I can’t imagine what they have that we don’t know about.
Obviously in the court of law everyone is innocent until proven guilty. But people are free to form their own opinions and express themselves in anyway they want to even without sufficient evidence, whether that’s a detriment to the prosecution or defence. Both can co-exist at the same time.
So many people are just jumping to conclusions about this. It scares me really to see that people think that the dna on that knife sheath by itself is enough to convict him and give the death penalty.
Anytime someone is arrested for anything they are perceived as guilty because the public likes to believe the law only arrests guilty people and not innocent people, it's human nature to think that and want to believe that.
I’m a retired homicide detective and I can tell you that they likely have cell phone tower triangulation locations which are much more accurate as Pacific, then just cell phone tower pings
I bet he documented on the computer everything he did and felt before, during, and after the murders. I wonder what his notes were like on the papers he graded.
Well done to this lawyer for being fair, keeping information guarded, and for really fighting for justice, whatever that looks like. People are so quick to judge these defence lawyers, when everyone is entitled to fair and equal representation.
I’m sure they have more than they telling the public. No arrest without something that would hold him accountable! Just wait and see it will all unfold in time
They have a mountain of circumstantial evidence. His DNA on the sheath of the probable murder weapon is insurmountable alone. Let alone the car, the cellphone etc
@@joedennehy386 there’s nothing insurmountable about the sheath though… contact dna only means he touched it at some point. I heard one of the experts say it could even mean it was touched by someone who had touched him and transfer his dna… a good defense could even get that taken out of evidence for trial!! I’m not saying for a second I think he’s innocent, but I’m not convinced he’s guilty either. The cell pings are something that bothers me, cell towers cover like 20 miles, yet he lives within 10 miles of where it happened… they can’t place him in that car and that also can’t even prove beyond a doubt that it WAS his car on cctv. It’s all circumstantial and circumstantial needs to be super strong to convict. There’s also the fact rear apparently the survivors heard nothing and even invited friends over hours later, I don’t know if that’s true but if it is that’s the whole crime scene contaminated and any good lawyer will absolutely knock that right out. The seeming discrepancies in the witness story…. Regardless of what we feel whether she has something to hide or not, a defense lawyer will do their damndest to convince a judge and jury that she does. This is in no way an open and shut case, slam dunk guilty, bye bye Bryan. If he gets a fair trial I can see him walking. And i hope if he did it he does not, but if he didn’t then he more than deserves that and all the people who decided he’s guilty because he doesn’t seem neurotypical need to take a good long look at themselves. I always get in my feelings when I see what people say about the guy, I have to admit. Like my son will not, cannot, eat food from a pan that meat has been cooked in… he has asd and he literally can’t stomach the very notion. He also wouldn’t hurt a soul and has frequently sacrificed things of his own to help others. He’s the gentlest boy I’ve ever met and seeing comments like the never ending “no meat in the pan he eats from? What a freak! Guilty!”really makes me question the thought processes behind the certainty of his guilt. Essay over now lol
Well said. Thank you for sharing about your son's reaction to pans in which meat was cooked. That is not an unusual reaction for very sensitive individuals. I pray there is a fair trial. I wonder if his professor at De Sales who is famous for her work with some serial killers will assist in the trial in some way.
I wonder if law enforcement and FBI have shut down looking for further suspects. If Bryan is innocent, which seems unlikely, that would mean that the killer is still out and about I hope they are still investigating possible other leads and individuals.
Elaborate. There doesn’t seem to be anything extraordinary in this case (of course murdering four people is an extraordinary act in itself but other than that).
@@lottnio8207 I was a deputy for a while in my youth (I'm 76 now). I was & still have been giving my 2 cents worth, consultanting, in various criminal issues since then....now & then, here & there. Even during an Unsolved Mysteries case in '80s I asked to not to be mentioned on their program (I'd asked the S.O. to have Charles Mule followed, he was & caught in the act, on film, arrested for 29 cts CM, only 18 victims came forth in court, he spent 12, + 2 for fleeing (which is a slap on the wrist), yrs in prison....I'm adding that to my book I'm writing & why I was asked to be a deputy in the 1st place). I like my solitude privacy. Since I do not have all the facts, I cannot say for sure @ this point....how trustworthy are medias for viable info?.....we all know they're lacking. I can remember seeing the news that told of our arrests that wasn't what we'd told the news.....that hasn't improved thru all these decades. There's more to this case, aside from obviously totally horrific, that's not making sense to me. It just 'feels' there's more as to why he'd do this & was he alone in his plans. Perhaps it's just because he should of been smarter than this inhumane act appears (tho it's certainly best to get perps out of society) so, something is missing. I've always had a mind, since very small, that needs to 'put pieces together', & so far, to me, there's missing pieces. There's absolutely no reason for my involvement in this case hence I wouldn't even offer, they'll figure it out.....I will follow this case tho because I just gotta have things to add up. Besides, no matter how old one is, we can always learn more....I'm still learning 😁.
That's a lie! Remember oj on plem hearing 10 days trial couple months From.that! Prosecutors looking for frame up time! I never heard of 6 months to put in a plea before!! Course when u trying this goad a man guilty!! U need that! He had no choice anyways! Did oj need die down time! He was guilty as sink Santa has nothing! He wanted waaaay into Sept to give the man even one hearing!!
this news wont go down because of a 6 month preliminary wait!! Everyone is going to want to hear about this crime in the coming weeks and for years !!! It was an absolute brutal crime 4 innocent young Idaho college kids lost their lives in such a brutal attack !! Nobodys going to turn a blind eye from this !!
People need to understand that if Kohberger isn't guilty not only an innocent man will be jailed and executed but most importantly a monster or monsters will be free on the streets so it's important to confirm his guilt with more proof and that's the process of justice
@@tinalyons3964 It sounds like you're being influenced by others who don't believe the Probable Cause Aff. You all like to use the very same buzz words... "massive holes". I don't think many of you understand what a PCA is. Considering that the Probable Cause is simply a brief example of reasons why it is believed that Brian may have committed these murders, and was a necessary document provided to the judge in order to obtain an arrest warrant for Bryan, how are you able to determine there are massive holes in their theory of what took place?
I’m glad I’m starting to see people in the comments with common sense that understand he’s innocent until proven guilty. Not jumping to conclusions because the media is painting a picture of him that they want us to see.
The first time i was his picture i felt bad and started crying because what if he wasn’t the one even if he was i feel pity for him bc he ruined peoples life and I wll as his
I would do the same thing. The defense needs time to study all the evidence , gather forensics experts to weaken the DNA evidence ( No , DNA is not infallible) and prepare their counter attack. On the other hand , it will also give the prosecution more time to strengthen their attack. This is going to be a very interesting trial.
Yes I cannot wait to hear the mental gymnastics that would have to be performed to explain his DNA on the sheath of the probable murder weapon, at the crime scene. That is insurmountable
The affidavit released only needs enough to arrest him and put him behind bars until trial. They could have more information they didn’t put in there. And that might be the only information the lawyer is going off of. He was his client. It makes sense why he would be defending him
If they find more evidence on his car, apartment, or phone/laptop... then the case is sealed. Right now, he seems to be guilty but yes there's possibilities of him getting off.
The endless amount of cases that have resulted in a correct conviction with less evidence than this should tell you that anyone that understands logic and reason can see straight through these humorous attempts to try and dismantle the mountain of evidence against this guy. You can't have coincidence after coincidence after coincidence after coincidence and make a believable case of doubt. You should bet the farm on your idea though.
Clearly the authorities were under pressure to make an arrest. If you read the affidavit you’ll realize the evidence was completely indirect & general. The media made the evidence direct & flawless, especially the cell phone signals & the car directions. Clearly hideous!!! The car & the cell movement as described in the affidavit were like “U” shaped, how come the day after the crime his car was spotted on surveillance in Indiana? Back & forth across the states. He lives 10 miles away from crime scene, so nothing special if his phone received signals within the same radius. I can’t help but wonder what if the actual murderer still out there watching all this
@ NO TIME TO DIE NTTD Let’s start with you since you the one who has the burden of proof since you made the claim. Do you mind sharing your source indicating the Wi-Fi pick-up the suspect phone? Obviously if you still think so 2 months later & after the recent discoveries regarding the credibility of the DNA evidence & the officers involved in the investigation; all that upheld my comment I made 2 month ago 👆
I can't remember the gentleman's name. He was arrested for shooting randomly on the interstate. Took years to find out the cops Had A Bad Case and had to make someone the criminal. Links in the reply comment
@@magnumxlpi it may have been. It's hard to keep track. I remember the gun being a Hi-Point and supposably they got ballistics off the gun. I'll try to find a link
@@peskycitizen66 oh then this was a different one involving a rifle. It was a serial shooter and the police said they got the guy and it definitely wasn't him
So you're willing to give Kohberger the benefit of the doubt, but you're suspicious of the roommate's statement? One may have slaughtered 4 people, and one may have told her story incorrectly. Does that actually sound reasonable to you?
My cell phone has pinged in Elcentro about 200 Miles from my residence. I haven't been to El Centro for at least 30 years.This has happened several times. Phone carrier could not explain why but that they have seen phones do that before. Any logical explanations?
Yes, if there's a lot of cellphone traffic in your local area and your phone can't connect to the towers, your phone will connect to the nearest tower can connect to. Your phone is constantly looking for the nearest cell tower to make a connection with.
@@wuzzycuzzy6656 likely you were just talking to one of their customer service representatives. They are usually don't know much of anything. A technical rep might have known more but then again, maybe not.
All of the work is being done behind the scenes.. Remember, LE got warrants to search his apartment, car, and office. I'm sure they have a lot more information. We just have to be patient to find out.
The public is not entitled to the information. Everyone wants it. They don't need it. The only people who need it are the people investigating it and the people representing the parties involved.
I agree - I’m sick and tired of seeing comments about people calling her out and saying she “raised” this “monster” - we become our own person with our own thoughts and opinions she couldn’t have stopped this if she tried. I can’t imagine what she is going through and asking herself “where did I go wrong” super sad situation.
I can’t even imagine how his mother is feeling right now, about her baby and about his unpromising future. Not even talking about shame or guilt… just the fact she gave her son a life for a reason… for a good reason, and not for taking people’s lives. May she find acceptance and resilience in all of this.
I can’t even imagine how his mother is feeling right now, about her baby and about his unpromising future. Not even talking about shame or guilt… just the fact she gave her son a life for a reason… for a good reason, and not for taking people’s lives. May she find acceptance and resilience in all of this.
I can’t even imagine how his mother is feeling right now, about her baby and about his unpromising future. Not even talking about shame or guilt… just the fact she gave her son a life for a reason… for a good reason, and not for taking people’s lives. May she find acceptance and resilience in all of this.
What kid doesn't own a pair of vans? You know the police in Idaho we're really Under Pressure to come up with a suspect. It's really amazing how people in the media and people in general are so hungry for this guy to be the person that killed those kid. This suspect is smart and I'm sure that Moscow pd. Will have a very hard time convicting .
It doesn't matter how many kids own a pair of vans. What matters is the size of the vans that stepped in blood at the murder scene and left a print, and whether or not they can be traced back to Bryan owning THAT pair, or purchasing a matching pair. Any wear marks in the tread or the sole of the shoe (sneaker) can distinguish the shoe print from all other shoe prints. It's a whole lot more technical than simply thinking "What kid doesn't own a pair of vans"? I guess you don't find it convincing that his phone moved together with his car to all of the points mentioned in the affidavit, coming and going at specific time frames and backed up by cctv video? How do you account for that? How do you explain that away? As for the suspect being smart? Let's assume he's book smart, because if LE can tie together the sheath, the car, the phone, the vans, and any other evidence gathered from his apartment or vehicle that's being tested now, good luck w hoping for an acquittal. You say it's amazing how hungry people are to want this guy to be the killer. I have to ask... why are you so untrusting of what's been presented in the affidavit, to the point that you're so sure he isn't? I don't understand your point of view anymore than you understand mine.
Everyone has a right to an attorney and the defense lawyers always seem to get a bad rap. Lawyers are competitive and they want to win, win, win. Understandable! But there are a lot of good lawyers who are forthright and truly care about their client. I was watching yesterday's Antifreeze murder retrial re Mark Jensen who is accused of killing his wife Julie, and at one point, the judge critically bashed the prosecuting team for not laying down their groundwork! I was taken aback by the judge's abruptness and annoyance! I don't think DarrelI Brooks (SovCit) would have stood a chance with this particular judge! No way! I don't envy lawyers at all! But God bless the good ones anyway!
Well said! I am grateful for our legal system. There is no guarantee that anyone will not be charged with a crime. Law enforcement are capable of making mistakes and innocent persons have been charged with a crime and have even received the death penalty. Further, persons who are actually guilty can plea to get the best deal. I was once accused of stealing medication out of a coworkers desk because my office was next to hers. I was interrogated by the police. It didn't get to the point that I had to get an attorney, but during the questioning I was wondering if I would need to do that. I was threatened by the police officer that DNA could be used to find the thief. I said, "Good! You do that. Then I will stop being harassed ".
They get a bad rap because they lie and blame someone else because they can't overcome the evidence that proves their client guilty. But as noted everyone deserves a defence and a fair trial.
Darrell Brooks also had a right to defend himself without a lawyer and he did a decent job. It's not just about winning. It's about making sure the trial is carried out in a fair way, even just to get a fair sentence. A legal defense ensures a person's reputation is completely accurate whether or not they're guilty. Otherwise the prosecution gets away with tacking on extraneous charges. Defense lawyers and those who choose to defend themselves should not be attacked for presenting a defense.
First everyone was attacking this public defender and criticizing him for being appointed to represent Bryan. But this man obviously understands the importance of presumption of innocence and having to be proven guilty beyond any and all reasonable doubt. He has more common sense than most people in the Untied States and that's scary. Thank you sir for your work.
He has to walk around with a bulletproof vest because there are so many gun nuts wanting to kill him. The safest place for him is in jail. Gun nuts don't believe in innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. They shoot to kill and ask questions later. Every gun owner thinks they have a right to kill without trial, jury or judge and that's why they own a Lethal Weapon
he has to follow the court process. You don't just stand up and say "excuse me judge, I'm innocent therefore I'm out of here. See yah! Try to stop me, buddy." It doesn't work like that. Sorry.
Lovely man. A fair trial is now of upmost importance. Obviously the horror of Ethan, Xana, Maddie and Kaylee’s murders have happened. We wish they hadn’t!!! But here we are, now onto the next process of this horror. Bryan’s Kohberger just like everyone deserves a fair trial. I prayed so much for the victims, now I pray for Bryan Kohbergers family, and the kids families always, they are all in a pain I can only imagine and hopefully never realise. 🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️
Amen to everything you shared, I have also been praying for Bryan-- specifically for his salvation. If God can reach someone like Saul/Paul in the Bible then there is hope for Bryan too. We must blanket everyone in prayer.
Everything this lawyer said I agreed with. Almost all the evidence seemed circumstantial to me when I first saw the affidavit. And I do think he has the right to a fair trial . It makes me sick reading comments when people were already finding him guilty because of his appearance and major. . . There’s always 3 sides to the story. Prosecution Defense and the Truth… hopefully The jury or judge can discern the true justice.
Out of curiosity then, what do you make of the DNA on the knife sheath found next to Madison’s body that, when compared with Bryan’s dad’s DNA, does not exclude his father from being the suspect’s father, yet excludes 99.9998% of the male population?
@@la1131 because its touch dna which means that type of dna could have been on that sheath many months prior to the murders. And also that its just the knife sheath and not the actual weapon this can easily be argued in court that it doesnt mean he actually killed the victims.
Isn’t this lawyer subject to the gag order?? Regardless, I’m so glad a defense perspective is being shared. I think the fair trial element has to be kept in the public’s mind.
Apparently since he’s outside Idaho he’s fair game, and these talking heads are going to keep having him emit pablum. He can’t say anything substantively because he has no access beyond public records. Questions like ”Are you going to stay in touch with Bryan?” are simply beyond comprehension.
Would have been interested to hear his thoughts on the surveillance of the suspect cleaning his vehicle at 4am at his parent’s house and using the neighbor’s garbage to dispose of items
May the person who never tossed their garbage in the neighbors garbage can, and who never suffered from insomnia and did something crazy like wash their car or paint their bedroom in the middle of the night, may that person be the first you know to have led the perfect, sinless life! You would win the prize as the "king of garbage collection knowledge" and "God's timekeeper of every act we do that doesn't concern you". Hope they put you on the jury, so you can convict this "very, very guilty" person and be a witness to his execution. Please stop and re-think your position. Peace!
I personally have used a neighbors trash bin when mine was full, with permission of course. And it was also my understanding that he went to the trash can at 4am, he was washing his car (winter in ID and PA) during the day. I also know quite a few people that are up at 4am everyday to get a head start on the day. All of this at this point is circumstantial.
Unreal! Yes “innocent until proven guilty “ BUT he CLEARLY did it, stop insulting the families who’ve lost their innocent children to this monster! They have MUCH more evidence to convict I’m sure of
@@danielzielke9997 How does playing Devils advocate benefit anyone in this situation? If not him, WHO killed them. Why was his DNA on at the scene? Why was he stalking them for months? Be serious.
The American jury system is a bit problematic compared to systems where professionals judges are more responsible to deliver justice but still many people are be capable to hold that assumption and give him a fair trial in that area too. The people who can’t are the loudest but not everyone loose their ability to think clearly and judge the evidence in a fair way. Many realise that emotional jumping to conclusions isn’t justice but works against it.
It's only a preliminary any hearing in June. Then comes the arrangement where he will have to plead innocent or guilty. If he pleads innocent the Judge will then schedule the trial.
Unfortunately I think one can be guilty, but if prosecution doesn't have enough of whatever evidence a jury wants to see, a person can walk. I wonder what the statistics show about people who actually committing a crime and walking. I just keep thinking about OJ
But you don’t know what other evidence they have found, you only know what is in the affidavit. They may find DNA evidence in his car or on the victim’s, we don’t know that yet.
Yes! And it is so sad, this is how Casey Anthony got off. So many people don’t take the time to understand the way it works in a court room. Her prosecutors took it for granted too, I think. But it’s so important to be fair otherwise we end up with all of these innocent people locked up years ago -people that everyone was so sure were guilty on circumstantial evidence and then DNA gets checked and they find out the person was innocent. Sometimes it sucks but it’s so necessary.
Sometimes it's great to have a defense attorney keep an innocent person out of jail and that's important. Sometimes they're working to get a vicious killer off the hook and I don't think anyone is okay with that. I think he did it and I pray to God he doesn't get a chance to kill someone else's child.
@Shannon May I agree I believe he did it also, there's too much evidence that points to him being the sole killer, plus what LE hasn't disclosed too much for it to be coincidental
I think one of the main reasons for the lawyer asking for the 5 month delay is for the media frenzy to die down. Also possibly to be able to review all the evidence as they are probably still processing some of the physical stuff. I feel terrible for this guys mother. I couldn't imagine one moment your child is a PHD student and on top of the World and then suddenly you get a call that they massacred 4 people! Its mind boggling 😢
His dear mother has to survive this. Because God can give such a test only to people who can handle it , with God's help of course. With unconditional faith in him. 🙏
Im afraid there was an obsession with evil in that family. Read two sisters were in a horror movie & mother wrote an autobiography on a serial killer. Not to mention Bryan messed up his mind with heroin years ago.
Barack Obama was a defense attorney Hillary Clinton was a defense attorney Johnny Cochran was a defense attorney Bill Clinton was a defense attorney Abraham Lincoln was a defense attorney..... The list is incredibly long and most people would be quite surprised!!!!!
Like I said before, don’t be surprised if he walks free, as of now if I was a jury I am not 100% convicted he did based on then evidence that police provided.
@@mirosderegil yep, good point. I very open minded, I really want Justice for the victims, but also I need some hard evidence in Order to put soMeone to sleep and I Am not convinced yet, hopefully media doesn’t ruin the case. The police changed their story wayyy too many times about this case. I just want to see a fair trail
@@mirosderegil Yes because a 100 pound girl can just go kill 4 people by herself(1 being a male) and on top of that not leave a trace of DNA evidence. What a 20 year old mastermind. And ofcourse she did all this for fun because there is no motive. Oh and the bloody clothes and murder weapon just vanishes into thin air since she never left the property.
@@JTB33b I never said I thought she acted alone. You need to watch more true crime.. you would be surprised at the reality of the world we live in. Also, you don't know if they don't have any DNA evidence from her.
Just speculation. 1. Kaylee and Madison The perpetrator enters the house. He pauses at the stairs to make sure no one on the second floor is awake. After this, he makes his way up to the third floor. He opens what he knows to be Kaylee's bedroom, accidently waking up the dog, he realizes she is not in her room. Promptly, he heads across the hall to Madison's bedroom. Kaylee and Madison are slain. (Reason for Theory: The room where the dog was, I would have to presume is the room that Kaylee would normally sleep in, hence accidently waking up the dog when he opened the door.) Interestingly if this is so, the question arises as to why Kaylee was sleeping with Madison that night. Had she been frightened by something or had she gone into Madison's room after they heard someone enter the house as it states in the affidavit. 2. Dylan Mortensen The perpetrator walks past D.M.'s room because he thinks she was in her usual bedroom, which was on the first floor and automatically assumed the room on the second floor is empty. 3. Xana and Ethan Now this part of the plot has a few variations which are plausible. Theory 1: The perpetrator murders Ethan Chapin first, which wakes up Xana, who in shock falls out of bed and onto the floor. Perhaps, the 'It's ok, I'm going to help you' was the perpetrators attempt at coaxing her into not fleeing in the pretenses of saving Ethan Chapin. Theory 2: Xana had ordered Door Dash at roughly 3: 40 pm. (this is documented) While she is eating her meal, Xana is disturbed by the commotion upstairs and upon inspection, she sees the perpetrator in the house with the knife. He is compelled to kill her because she is now a witness. Xana runs back into the bedroom, where she is attacked first, after which, Ethan Chapin is murdered. If this is the case, then Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin are victims by circumstance. This would explain why he would not bother going to the first floor of the house. He never intended to kill all four victims. If this speculation is at all true (remember at this time this is just speculation and a personal opinion) the murderer had to have been someone who was familiar with the houses floor plan and designated rooms prior to the night of the attack. With everything stated above, the murderer had to be someone they knew or someone who had seen the interior of the house previously. Remember, the murders were committed in an estimated total of 9 minutes. Thinking objectively, enter a random house and try to locate each and every person, stab them to death and without leaving any trace, besides a small 6 mm piece of evidence and one shoe print behind. (DISCLAIMER: If you do decide to literally try this, I am not responsible for your inane behavior.) Why would the murderer begin with the third floor and work their way down to only the second floor, where they would murder two of the three residents on that same floor? Why, if the murderer was targeting all four of the victims, would the perpetrator leave two potential witnesses behind? This was clearly a well planned and premeditated operation. The murderer would have had to be aware of Dylan and Bethany living at that residence. The perpetrator did not go into this blindly; which leaves the question of why not remove the possibility of all witnesses- Dylan and Bethany? As for Xana, the possibility that she had physically been seen by the murderer and thus, a known witness, would lead to her and Ethan's removal. In other words, they originally did not intend to kill all residents in the house, rather just one, but due to unforeseen circumstances three out of the four (Kaylee, Madison, Xana and Ethan) had become circumstantial victims. So, which one was the original victim? A clue might be the first room the murder entered. Objectively, the way this case has been built seems too hasty and too conveniently simple. Thoughts?
@@desertsunset8025 Still does not answer why start on the third floor. As for stalking: There is no solid evidence that he stalked them besides the phone pings, which are vague in of themselves. Tracking accuracy can vary from 0.25 miles to several miles, depending upon how many obstacles could be blocking the tower's signal. We know the University would put Kohberger well within the ping signal at a range of 0.8 miles from 1122 King Road. This is not substantial enough for evidence of stalking. If you have any other information on the specifics of stalking it would be interesting to read. As for the house, the images and details were made private after being rented. Even if they were public or accessible, it still does not give enough information for such accuracy. The speed at which the perpetrator entered and navigated the house is still quite questionable. Now if Kohberger is the perpetrator (which is a possibility) had he previously entered the house without their knowledge. Could be a possibility.
If it was targeted at one person, he'd have to know which room they were in. How can someone who's stalking from a distance know which room, even if he somehow knew the floorplan? In my opinion, he has to have known someone in that house, or made a dry run on a previous night.
@@darkwitnesslxx Exactly my thoughts. When he entered the house it is strange that he would automatically make his way to the third floor. Why not start from the second floor where Xana and Ethan were if his intention was to murder all four.
But let's make no mistake about it *DUDE* (Female poser) this is no innocent person *To an absolute 100% certainty* Care for more Mary Go Round *DUDE* ?
if you observe Bryan, he does not look like an evil person. they say the eyes of a person are the windows to his soul. i advise anyone who wants everyone to believe he is a villian, look at his face and demeanor again. He studies so hard and aspires to be in Law Enforcement. He does not come from a rich family. He works as a security and pizza place and teaching assistant. He struggles with depression and drugs etc. Who doesn't? But all these do not make him a murderer. It is the wrongful arrest and the malicious criticism of the media and social media that will make him a murderer. Everyone should be presumed innocent until proven otherwise. What if he would otherwise become a very good cop in Law Enforcement? Was he at the wrong place at the wrong time. We all need to put on our pair of compassionate and objective lens, He is a young man with a very bright future. I just pray God will intervene to help the cop and investigate nail the right person. We must all pray and criticize less.
Yeah, this is going to be interesting… there’s nothing but the car possibly being his, pings, and transfer. I really hope they have something more than that cause essentially that’s the basis on why they arrested him, which is pretty crazy tbo.
Sorry this evidence is not 100%, I am not saying he is innocent or guilty, but I hope the trial reveals more evidence because if he’s not the perpetrator, the killer or killers are still out there.
there are other suspicious deaths in the Greek community at that university and officials are tight-lipped and have closed the cases and refuse any questions or inquiries.
I cannot imagine a circumstance under which a public defender *needs* to speak to his client for _FOUR hours,_ in order to handle a simple, interstate extradition case.
This lawyer has brought up all my own personal concerns. I would not be surprised if Bryan is innocent, nor would I be surprised if he is merely a getaway driver and the accomplice is still out there.
At first I saw no way it wasn’t him but the more I think about it the more I realize that the timing of the food being delivered and his car being caught leaving the neighborhood is troubling me.
He's definitely creepy.. And I'm not saying that because of what he's been arrested for.. I'm saying if I met him before all this I would still feel the same.. He has a creepy vibe and his eyes just look empty.. Very strange looking weird guy.. You can actually feel energy from people you meet. That's why if you ever get a gut feeling from someone go with that feeling. People give off energy whether it be negative or positive. Use your senses to judge just that.. These young kids didn't have the chance to make that choice.. The killer is the worst off the lot.. He targeted them like something out of a horror movie like scream. He's sick AF.
@@lisadavie5819 he is clearly disturbed. On reddit's sub about him, someone found his past internet posts describing his psyche.. and those dark energies surely radiate outside his skin. Creepy indeed.
When he told the police officer that pulled him over that they were going for Thai food ....... seems like they have the right guy. He looked totally freaked out. Time will tell.
what an IGNORANT and UNEDUCATED comment!! I'm going for Thai food so you got the right guy for murder. What would he have been guilty of if he said they were going for TACOS, a drug dealer? Burgers, rappest? Go play with your cats.
![[TH] 2024 PMSL SEA W3D1 | Fall | สัปดาห์ตัดสิน ทีมไปไฟนอล](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZBU3GyzqErI/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
This is the 1st interview that i can respect from the interviewer n interviewee. Thankyou for remaining open n respecting the justice system n the defendant being innocent until proven guilty in the court of law!
Its really great to see the defense attorney saying to be his voice and fair trial .Justice should prevail...
I'm grateful there are people like Jason to safeguard our justice system even when the Defense position is unpopular.
Everyone deserves a fair trial to guarantee their constitutional rights are upheld... like unlawful search and seizure, being allowed to not talk unless they can get a lawyer etc.....but it absolutely gets my blood boiling when a defendant is very obviously guilty but the Defense Attorney tries to get that pertinent evidence excluded so the jury doesn't get to find out about it, or the Defense Attorney tries to cast blame on someone else just to try to get at least one juror to have a doubt. I just feel like if the defendant is guilty their attorney should only be allowed to make sure their rights aren't violated...but they still have to take a guilty plea
Edit* for everyone in the comments telling me that it's the defense's job to get their client off because an innocent person shouldn't go to jail. YES I know this. When I say 100 percent guilty, I'm saying DNA evidence, witness, video evidence, digital trail etc, not just a feeling the person is guilty....but even with all these things, some defense attorneys still try to get their client off. I think that's bs
@@scorpion-lg4ic completely agree with you. I believe what you describe is exactly what was intended in the constitution. It was never about using the system to get a guilty person off. Sadly many seem to think that’s an acceptable approach for defense lawyers to take.
@@scorpion-lg4ic like the Duke Lacrosse team?
@@dougcorcoran5455 bruh
His position should not be to discredit evidence. It should be an attempt to get kohberger the best possible deal. Plead guilty, because we all know you did it, or get proven guilty and hang.
I have seen the police blame an innocent man for a crime that he didn't commit. It was a horrible crime that he could have received life in prison, or more likely gotten the death penalty if he had been convicted. I called the FBI and explained to them why I knew that they had the wrong gut, and why I believed that I had seen the man who had run away from the crime scene moments after it happened.
It ruined this guy's life, and destroyed his reputation. The allegations of fake evidence that law enforcement officials drummed up about him were repeated by the media, and caused me to be genuinely paranoid and fearful of law enforcement for years. This man had saved hundreds of lives at the crime scene. It gave people a false since of security, prevented law enforcement from investigating to find the real perpetrator, and it gave the man the opportunity to carry out more mass murder. I have no evidence that the Idaho law enforcement officials have falsely accused this man for killing these college students.
But the students at the college, and other people in the community are comfortable now that the police have arrested and charged this man for the crime. I just want to make up my mind after I see all of the evidence that they have against him and his defense.
The prosecution has the burden of proof. The last thing I want to see is an innocent man get convicted and-or the murder go free.
Sober Up
go read the probable cause affidavit
agree resoundingly.
Let's ask Michael Morton, Ronald Cotton, and Juan Catalan if wrongful convictions can occur. The case here looks strong, and I hope that a fair trial secures the conviction of the guilty party.
Hes guilty AF
I got to say, Kohberger is finally going to complete his education with this conviction.
The real education is going to come behind bars, stuff he didn’t learn in class
@@ow3wells yes... they are going to have a field day with him... I'm sure he will go to Max and in there they are in their for life and most don't care... he is going to be someone girl friend within a week of being there. Also yes they may give him vegan food but let's be real they most likely don't truly honor that request... that and it's loud people are screaming acting crazy... he is in for a treat lol...
@Bri Pearce you sure? I'm sure it's not torture
@@bripearce45 he’ll have a buffet of Vegan penis served upon the hour in jail. All he can eat no doubt. Although Idaho has the death penalty in the cards for this POS
kohberger did nothing wrong lol stay mad parents
What could be worse than simply assuming a person was guilty, convicting them wrongfully and letting the real offender prowl around out there to possibly murder again? None of us would be safe without good defense lawyers.
What could be worse, not convicting someone who was guilty to murder again..
Yes we absolutely do need good defense attorneys! People are accused of falsely of crimes everyday by police and prosecutors out of vengeance, overzealousness for re-election purposes , tunnel vision, etc It happens every day and I know many who have been a victim. I personally believe BK to be an absolute monster & guilty and I assume there will be plenty of actual evidence to tie him to the crime, but that doesn't mean he doesn't deserve a fair trial.
@@veronicasavage1182innocent people do go to jail. Not saying this guy is innocent. But just reminding you so you understand why there needs to be fair trial
Boy bye. That man is guilty.
Not guilty does not mean innocent. Has OJ found who murdered his wife and Ron Goldman? Do the police consider it a cold case? Are they still looking for the murderer? 9:25 I heard Dershowitz recently accuse police of planting evidence in that case.
This is the best, most realistic interview I’ve seen in this entire case.
Not me!
@@wqv5423ln Ok, thanks for letting me know…
@@RadMc02 and thanks for letting us know.
@@wqv5423ln Thanks for letting us know
@@wqv5423ln thats a shame nevermind lets hope they catch the real killers instead
Excellent interview. Important to have defense attorneys explain the process.
Great unbiased conversations.
Well done!
exactly well done Law and Crime
I really appreciated this interview and the words and demeanor of this defense attorney.
Thanks for informing us about it! That was so intriguing!
But how does it benefit his former client? Only benefits his fame
Why?
Media and people already made him guilty. Thank God we have defending lawyers.
Thank you for fair trial comments...many have forgotten that.
I've lived near Moscow Idaho my whole life. (Local news and officials refer to this area as "the quad-cities.) In my experience the reason defense attorneys here give for waving a speedy trial and putting it off for months and months is to get public attention and opinion to die down so they can eventually work out a plea agreement with the prosecution. In this case I would consider that to be a futile attempt considering it's so high profile, but also, the defendant strikes me as more inclined to go to trial to prove his innocence than he is to take a plea deal. (This is not a comment about his innocence or guilt.)
Thanks for the perspective, Marjie. We all learn from people from you.
From what I heard on another channel, the prosecution has hinted that the only plea deal that they might consider would be to take a guilty plea in exchange for life in prison without the possibility of parole and take the death penalty off the table. They are not plea bargaining down to something like a guilty plea for 20-30 years with the possibility of parole after 15 years or something like that. The parents of some of the victims have publicly stated that they want nothing less than the death penalty but they realize that not everyone is in favor of the death penalty so they would accept life in prison without the possibility of parole as a possible compromise with the families of the other victims who might not want a death sentence but that’s as far as they’re budging. I don’t think that in six months the parents who are strongly for the death penalty will have changed their minds about that. If anything the six month delay will give them more time to have experienced without their children who they miss dearly and it might make them want to see the death sentence (or life without parole) handed down that much more. I think just based upon the evidence that they’ve already revealed that they have in the probable cause affidavit alone, the prosecution feels strongly about their case and are confident in their chances at trial. Of course they haven’t gone through the discovery period yet in order to see what evidence Kohberger’s attorney has, so in going through the discovery period if his attorney can produce some exculpatory evidence, that might make them change their tune. I would imagine that the only thing that would cause them to want to deal is some kind of iron clad alibi that he was hundreds of miles away at the time of the murders or something else irrefutable to prove that it couldn’t have been him. Anything short of that is going to see this case go to trial.
@@beautifulsurprise9424 I totally agree with you very well said. I think if it were a piece of some of what they have then no. But for them to explain the sheath. Why would it even be in a bed. Also the pings matching cameras on the very street ya that plays so those who think pings r not good enough to put him there more then once is crazy in itself. Plus at the girls job having words with them n other employees there enough to make them afraid and write in their POS system about him. Plus the fact he cleans his car and changes plates to add a plate. I mean such lame things that they are using as evidence actually in a whole are great to show he did these crimes. And I don't think you can wash blood from clothes or from cars upholstery and they haven't even said anything about weather anything showed up in the car. And to me he seems the type to wear vans just saying. If he doesn't have more then one pair seriously like a phone college kids love their vans . It's slum dunk in my opinion.
@@beautifulsurprise9424 If I had to guess, BK probably would prefer the death penalty. He has been tortured in his own mind for most of his life, it appears. He figures...go out in a big way. So devastating.😥
In cases like this that attorney's ONLY job is to delay as much and as long as possible to keep their client alive and off of death row for another day.
Honestly their is nothing wrong with a defense attorney defending their client. It’s quite fascinating to see what the defense will come up with to combat the prosecutions evidence. Everyone has the right to a presumption of innocence until proven guilty and a way to follow that right is to give the accused legal representation to help fight any accusation.
*there
How many thousands of people have been convicted, later to be found innocent. We should not jump to conclusions just yet.
Ms. Levy is reminding me that presentation of evidence is the life force. I have strong feelings regarding this case. The lives of these victims and their manner of death is overwhelming. I have pure compassion for the lives of the parents, friends and families of these tragic souls. God help us all!
🥴🥴🥴🥴
All the families including the family of the accused. Broke my heart seeing his dad sweep up the broken glass from his home being raided.
😂😂 God created all the misery, sheep
Baaaaaaaa
So why your God didn’t help the victims to begin with
This is a great interview. The way people have attacked, ridiculed, mocked this man who has not even been proven guilty is absolutely shocking. I hope he sues everyone. This is the culture in America. If you are different, you are attacked and assumed guilty by looks alone. Thank you for this interview.
well said Gill i feel the same way ,, innocent until proven guilty and so far its looking bad for the prosecution
How is it looking bad for the prosecution? It rarely ever looks this good for the prosecution. How often do they have a random item left next to the victim with dna? That is on top of all of the circumstantial evidence that we know about from one affidavit. I can’t imagine what they have that we don’t know about.
Obviously in the court of law everyone is innocent until proven guilty. But people are free to form their own opinions and express themselves in anyway they want to even without sufficient evidence, whether that’s a detriment to the prosecution or defence. Both can co-exist at the same time.
@@tinalyons3964 Thanks for the laugh. Looking bad for the prosecution, lol, looking bad for your boy is what it looks like.
Well when you murder four college kids with a knife you're going to get put to death by the state so its about to get a whole lot worse for your boy.
Finally someone who is speaking for him as innocent. Wait and see the evidence.
So many people are just jumping to conclusions about this. It scares me really to see that people think that the dna on that knife sheath by itself is enough to convict him and give the death penalty.
A gag order is needed because of the media pronouncing him guilty already. They are being watched by potential jurors.
I thought there was a gag order in place already?
@@Matunahelper Worst gag order ever
Social media, anyway
Anytime someone is arrested for anything they are perceived as guilty because the public likes to believe the law only arrests guilty people and not innocent people, it's human nature to think that and want to believe that.
Man, you gotta be living on another universe to assume this dude is possibly innocent.
Innocent until proven guilty, unless it's on social media.
TV news proclaimed Kohberger guilty within hours of his arrest.
The poor students that were butchered.
Cannot even imagine how their parents are dealing with this.
The truth will be proved.
I’m a retired homicide detective and I can tell you that they likely have cell phone tower triangulation locations which are much more accurate as Pacific, then just cell phone tower pings
Thanks for actually saying that because they are pretty right on as far as location.
*WAITS* To debunk you to an absolute certainty. And I will
*WAITS*
I'll wager to an absolute 100% undisputed certainty you are no/or never were a homicide detective.. I can prove it right here pal. Care to take on me?
@@trevmac8362 sure.
Thank you L & C Sidebar
Appreciate good interview and information
The suspect's computer forensics history is probably a goldmine.
His car will be a biggy too
I bet he documented on the computer everything he did and felt before, during, and after the murders. I wonder what his notes were like on the papers he graded.
& that is WHY the search warrant is sealed. May be waiting for more DNA from apt or car.
@@anitakristensen4679 he focus was cloud forensics. He home computer will tell us if he really learned anything about the cloud.
@@annem7806 his computers will tell us alot about him. Including his lap top and the ones at work.
So far tye only guy that talks objectively and factual.
This is going to be a very serious trial
Brian is going to love every minute of it.
Isn't every murder trial serious?
@@barneyrubble4741 yes. But this one is much more sensationalized than the majority.
@@uwpride how does that have anything to do with the statement "this is going to be a very serious trial". Absolutely nothing.
and I bet on it to last very long.. heck only for a prelim hearing we need to wait until summer.... let alone trials and whatnot
Well done to this lawyer for being fair, keeping information guarded, and for really fighting for justice, whatever that looks like. People are so quick to judge these defence lawyers, when everyone is entitled to fair and equal representation.
The evidence is weak
He is presumed innocent until found guilty.
Not by me.
True, but when he is found guilty he will be duly delivered up unto Bubba.
He’s presumed innocent until evidence says otherwise.
Why hasn’t he took a lie detector test yet?
@Ginger Adcox cause not admissible in court. And if he did take one they don't have to tell us.
I’m sure they have more than they telling the public. No arrest without something that would hold him accountable! Just wait and see it will all unfold in time
They have a mountain of circumstantial evidence. His DNA on the sheath of the probable murder weapon is insurmountable alone. Let alone the car, the cellphone etc
@@joedennehy386 there’s nothing insurmountable about the sheath though… contact dna only means he touched it at some point. I heard one of the experts say it could even mean it was touched by someone who had touched him and transfer his dna… a good defense could even get that taken out of evidence for trial!! I’m not saying for a second I think he’s innocent, but I’m not convinced he’s guilty either. The cell pings are something that bothers me, cell towers cover like 20 miles, yet he lives within 10 miles of where it happened… they can’t place him in that car and that also can’t even prove beyond a doubt that it WAS his car on cctv. It’s all circumstantial and circumstantial needs to be super strong to convict. There’s also the fact rear apparently the survivors heard nothing and even invited friends over hours later, I don’t know if that’s true but if it is that’s the whole crime scene contaminated and any good lawyer will absolutely knock that right out. The seeming discrepancies in the witness story…. Regardless of what we feel whether she has something to hide or not, a defense lawyer will do their damndest to convince a judge and jury that she does. This is in no way an open and shut case, slam dunk guilty, bye bye Bryan. If he gets a fair trial I can see him walking. And i hope if he did it he does not, but if he didn’t then he more than deserves that and all the people who decided he’s guilty because he doesn’t seem neurotypical need to take a good long look at themselves. I always get in my feelings when I see what people say about the guy, I have to admit. Like my son will not, cannot, eat food from a pan that meat has been cooked in… he has asd and he literally can’t stomach the very notion. He also wouldn’t hurt a soul and has frequently sacrificed things of his own to help others. He’s the gentlest boy I’ve ever met and seeing comments like the never ending “no meat in the pan he eats from? What a freak! Guilty!”really makes me question the thought processes behind the certainty of his guilt. Essay over now lol
Well said. Thank you for sharing about your son's reaction to pans in which meat was cooked. That is not an unusual reaction for very sensitive individuals.
I pray there is a fair trial. I wonder if his professor at De Sales who is famous for her work with some serial killers will assist in the trial in some way.
@@armstrongdhawan6338 Thank you for saying this so perfectly
@@armstrongdhawan6338
I wonder if law enforcement and FBI have shut down looking for further suspects. If Bryan is innocent, which seems unlikely, that would mean that the killer is still out and about
I hope they are still investigating possible other leads and individuals.
The most likely suspect is the FBI and they're not looking for anyone else.
True
It's obviously him.
@@tammoton9494 But how
@@erickennedy3322 his dna was literally found at the scene
There is something 'off' with this case.
Elaborate. There doesn’t seem to be anything extraordinary in this case (of course murdering four people is an extraordinary act in itself but other than that).
@@lottnio8207
I was a deputy for a while in my youth (I'm 76 now). I was & still have been giving my 2 cents worth, consultanting, in various criminal issues since then....now & then, here & there. Even during an Unsolved Mysteries case in '80s I asked to not to be mentioned on their program (I'd asked the S.O. to have Charles Mule followed, he was & caught in the act, on film, arrested for 29 cts CM, only 18 victims came forth in court, he spent 12, + 2 for fleeing (which is a slap on the wrist), yrs in prison....I'm adding that to my book I'm writing & why I was asked to be a deputy in the 1st place). I like my solitude privacy. Since I do not have all the facts, I cannot say for sure @ this point....how trustworthy are medias for viable info?.....we all know they're lacking.
I can remember seeing the news that told of our arrests that wasn't what we'd told the news.....that hasn't improved thru all these decades.
There's more to this case, aside from obviously totally horrific, that's not making sense to me. It just 'feels' there's more as to why he'd do this & was he alone in his plans.
Perhaps it's just because he should of been smarter than this inhumane act appears (tho it's certainly best to get perps out of society) so, something is missing.
I've always had a mind, since very small, that needs to 'put pieces together', & so far, to me, there's missing pieces.
There's absolutely no reason for my involvement in this case hence I wouldn't even offer, they'll figure it out.....I will follow this case tho because I just gotta have things to add up. Besides, no matter how old one is, we can always learn more....I'm still learning 😁.
@@lottnio8207 Well said again.
@@benjiebenjamin7810 same here with 'the pieces don't fit'. Thanks for speaking up.
@@benjiebenjamin7810 ok thank you! Apparently you are not just randomly saying things like some people.
The second I heard the 6 month request, I knew they were trying to get the news to die down on the case before going to trial.
hiding the truth and real killers
Agreed. They’ll have some sort of count down.
That's a lie! Remember oj on plem hearing 10 days trial couple months From.that! Prosecutors looking for frame up time! I never heard of 6 months to put in a plea before!! Course when u trying this goad a man guilty!! U need that! He had no choice anyways! Did oj need die down time! He was guilty as sink Santa has nothing! He wanted waaaay into Sept to give the man even one hearing!!
Supposed to say oj!!
this news wont go down because of a 6 month preliminary wait!! Everyone is going to want to hear about this crime in the coming weeks and for years !!! It was an absolute brutal crime 4 innocent young Idaho college kids lost their lives in such a brutal attack !! Nobodys going to turn a blind eye from this !!
Bryan should have kept this man as lawyer
Any lawyer can say the same he’s saying. There is nothing complicated here.
They prolly hv to be licensed to practice in specific states just like doctors
I feel sorry for his family and the victims families
The Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree
@@newjdm yeah it does
I cry for his victim s Family’s, period!
Bryan's car is a rolling crime scene.
Didn't he clean it at 4 am?
@@Chalize It was cleaned at GMT, not the local time that you're implying.
The car was absolutely clean.
People need to understand that if Kohberger isn't guilty not only an innocent man will be jailed and executed but most importantly a monster or monsters will be free on the streets so it's important to confirm his guilt with more proof and that's the process of justice
He's clearly guilty tho
@@sinatra222 not 100% true,, and i dont see anything clear in the affidavit just massive holes
Name nom95... That's virtually the case in every murder trial. This is no different.
@@jlnriddick exactly it's called justice, that's why there's a trial and innocent until proven guilty. that's exactly my point
@@tinalyons3964 It sounds like you're being influenced by others who don't believe the Probable Cause Aff. You all like to use the very same buzz words... "massive holes". I don't think many of you understand what a PCA is. Considering that the Probable Cause is simply a brief example of reasons why it is believed that Brian may have committed these murders, and was a necessary document provided to the judge in order to obtain an arrest warrant for Bryan, how are you able to determine there are massive holes in their theory of what took place?
Awesome interview! TY 4 sharing
They have the wrong guy
I’m glad I’m starting to see people in the comments with common sense that understand he’s innocent until proven guilty. Not jumping to conclusions because the media is painting a picture of him that they want us to see.
He's guilty. Look at his eyes. He reminds me of Adam Lanza. Nuttier than a fruitcake.
The first time i was his picture i felt bad and started crying because what if he wasn’t the one even if he was i feel pity for him bc he ruined peoples life and I wll as his
No direct evidence yet!
I got a funny feeling that this case is going to be going on for the next 2 or 3 years. 🤔
experts have warned about this
Should be over in 2 month Guilty and death.
ANGENETTE is a great interviewer.
He’s innocent and we will all find out soon
When I look at his eyes, he reminds me of Ted Bundy. He has that killer stare.
I agree. Very much like those of Ted Bundy.
Most killer have no stare.
I would do the same thing.
The defense needs time to study all the evidence , gather forensics experts to weaken the DNA evidence ( No , DNA is not infallible) and prepare their counter attack.
On the other hand , it will also give the prosecution more time to strengthen their attack.
This is going to be a very interesting trial.
it will not be in his favor as the evidence will be too much to defend
DNA evidence should be infallible. Unless you’re an OJ juror.
DNA is pretty infallible. its people's understanding of DNA that is fallible.
Yes, it will be indeed one interesting trial for a future movie to be made. Secluded Bryan gets all the attention now!!!
Yes I cannot wait to hear the mental gymnastics that would have to be performed to explain his DNA on the sheath of the probable murder weapon, at the crime scene. That is insurmountable
What this lawyer is saying is exactly what I've been saying. I bet he's going to get off. Everything they have is circumstantial.
The affidavit released only needs enough to arrest him and put him behind bars until trial. They could have more information they didn’t put in there. And that might be the only information the lawyer is going off of. He was his client. It makes sense why he would be defending him
@@Alicieon but the affidavit has so many holes that can be argued against so why would the prosecution risk that >
If they find more evidence on his car, apartment, or phone/laptop... then the case is sealed. Right now, he seems to be guilty but yes there's possibilities of him getting off.
The endless amount of cases that have resulted in a correct conviction with less evidence than this should tell you that anyone that understands logic and reason can see straight through these humorous attempts to try and dismantle the mountain of evidence against this guy. You can't have coincidence after coincidence after coincidence after coincidence and make a believable case of doubt. You should bet the farm on your idea though.
Clearly the authorities were under pressure to make an arrest.
If you read the affidavit you’ll realize the evidence was completely indirect & general. The media made the evidence direct & flawless, especially the cell phone signals & the car directions. Clearly hideous!!! The car & the cell movement as described in the affidavit were like “U” shaped, how come the day after the crime his car was spotted on surveillance in Indiana? Back & forth across the states. He lives 10 miles away from crime scene, so nothing special if his phone received signals within the same radius. I can’t help but wonder what if the actual murderer still out there watching all this
The victims Wifi picked up his phone drg non party time.
@@notimetodienttd1115 not . true
@@Seashellsbytheseashore21 Based on?
@@notimetodienttd1115 the only person who said that was Kaylee Goncalez's father. Do not believe law enforcement has come out and said that.
@ NO TIME TO DIE NTTD
Let’s start with you since you the one who has the burden of proof since you made the claim. Do you mind sharing your source indicating the Wi-Fi pick-up the suspect phone?
Obviously if you still think so 2 months later & after the recent discoveries regarding the credibility of the DNA evidence & the officers involved in the investigation; all that upheld my comment I made 2 month ago 👆
I can't remember the gentleman's name. He was arrested for shooting randomly on the interstate. Took years to find out the cops Had A Bad Case and had to make someone the criminal.
Links in the reply comment
The one in Phoenix?
@@magnumxlpi it may have been. It's hard to keep track. I remember the gun being a Hi-Point and supposably they got ballistics off the gun. I'll try to find a link
@@peskycitizen66 oh then this was a different one involving a rifle. It was a serial shooter and the police said they got the guy and it definitely wasn't him
Great video. He deserves a fair trial.
The roommate statement doesn’t add up to me since day one.
Hopefully they figure it out before it’s too late
So you're willing to give Kohberger the benefit of the doubt, but you're suspicious of the roommate's statement? One may have slaughtered 4 people, and one may have told her story incorrectly. Does that actually sound reasonable to you?
Now we refer to him as the PHD student?? And not accused murderer?
i mean, both are correct terms to use, so what’s the problem? 💀
he is a phd student and ?
People refer to him using many different terms.
My comment refers to the stark change in this specific channels reporting of these crimes.
I call him a scumbag.
My cell phone has pinged in Elcentro about 200 Miles from my residence. I haven't been to El Centro for at least 30 years.This has happened several times. Phone carrier could not explain why but that they have seen phones do that before. Any logical explanations?
Yes, if there's a lot of cellphone traffic in your local area and your phone can't connect to the towers, your phone will connect to the nearest tower can connect to. Your phone is constantly looking for the nearest cell tower to make a connection with.
@@G2thesecondpower Thank you Geforce!! My cell carrier couldn't even give me an answer. Your explanation makes sense. 👌:)
@@wuzzycuzzy6656 likely you were just talking to one of their customer service representatives. They are usually don't know much of anything. A technical rep might have known more but then again, maybe not.
I feel like everyone is pulling at straws now. No new info has come out. It’s all thoughts and speculation only now ☹️
All of the work is being done behind the scenes.. Remember, LE got warrants to search his apartment, car, and office. I'm sure they have a lot more information. We just have to be patient to find out.
Totally. Very frustrating. I'm shocked this attorney was willing to be interviewed.
@@TreeofLife_111 Yup, these things take time. It's not a season to a TV series where you can binge-watch. It's real life.
The public is not entitled to the information. Everyone wants it. They don't need it. The only people who need it are the people investigating it and the people representing the parties involved.
Internet detective police in force. I think this, i think that. Blah blah blah.
I am very sorry for Bryan's mother, no mother deserves to live this kind of shocking experience
maybe she shouldn't have raised a spoiled vegan incel. maybe feel sorry for the mothers of the victims.
I agree - I’m sick and tired of seeing comments about people calling her out and saying she “raised” this “monster” - we become our own person with our own thoughts and opinions she couldn’t have stopped this if she tried. I can’t imagine what she is going through and asking herself “where did I go wrong” super sad situation.
I can’t even imagine how his mother is feeling right now, about her baby and about his unpromising future. Not even talking about shame or guilt… just the fact she gave her son a life for a reason… for a good reason, and not for taking people’s lives. May she find acceptance and resilience in all of this.
I can’t even imagine how his mother is feeling right now, about her baby and about his unpromising future. Not even talking about shame or guilt… just the fact she gave her son a life for a reason… for a good reason, and not for taking people’s lives. May she find acceptance and resilience in all of this.
I can’t even imagine how his mother is feeling right now, about her baby and about his unpromising future. Not even talking about shame or guilt… just the fact she gave her son a life for a reason… for a good reason, and not for taking people’s lives. May she find acceptance and resilience in all of this.
What kid doesn't own a pair of vans? You know the police in Idaho we're really Under Pressure to come up with a suspect. It's really amazing how people in the media and people in general are so hungry for this guy to be the person that killed those kid. This suspect is smart and I'm sure that Moscow pd. Will have a very hard time convicting .
It doesn't matter how many kids own a pair of vans. What matters is the size of the vans that stepped in blood at the murder scene and left a print, and whether or not they can be traced back to Bryan owning THAT pair, or purchasing a matching pair. Any wear marks in the tread or the sole of the shoe (sneaker) can distinguish the shoe print from all other shoe prints. It's a whole lot more technical than simply thinking "What kid doesn't own a pair of vans"? I guess you don't find it convincing that his phone moved together with his car to all of the points mentioned in the affidavit, coming and going at specific time frames and backed up by cctv video? How do you account for that? How do you explain that away? As for the suspect being smart? Let's assume he's book smart, because if LE can tie together the sheath, the car, the phone, the vans, and any other evidence gathered from his apartment or vehicle that's being tested now, good luck w hoping for an acquittal. You say it's amazing how hungry people are to want this guy to be the killer. I have to ask... why are you so untrusting of what's been presented in the affidavit, to the point that you're so sure he isn't? I don't understand your point of view anymore than you understand mine.
Everyone has a right to an attorney and the defense lawyers always seem to get a bad rap. Lawyers are competitive and they want to win, win, win. Understandable! But there are a lot of good lawyers who are forthright and truly care about their client. I was watching yesterday's Antifreeze murder retrial re Mark Jensen who is accused of killing his wife Julie, and at one point, the judge critically bashed the prosecuting team for not laying down their groundwork! I was taken aback by the judge's abruptness and annoyance! I don't think DarrelI Brooks (SovCit) would have stood a chance with this particular judge! No way! I don't envy lawyers at all! But God bless the good ones anyway!
Exactly right!
I agree!
Even guilty client has a chance to be proven innocent with a great work of his attorney
Well said! I am grateful for our legal system. There is no guarantee that anyone will not be charged with a crime. Law enforcement are capable of making mistakes and innocent persons have been charged with a crime and have even received the death penalty. Further, persons who are actually guilty can plea to get the best deal. I was once accused of stealing medication out of a coworkers desk because my office was next to hers. I was interrogated by the police. It didn't get to the point that I had to get an attorney, but during the questioning I was wondering if I would need to do that. I was threatened by the police officer that DNA could be used to find the thief. I said, "Good! You do that. Then I will stop being harassed ".
They get a bad rap because they lie and blame someone else because they can't overcome the evidence that proves their client guilty. But as noted everyone deserves a defence and a fair trial.
Are the reasons for a retrial due to legal loops holes in their arguements?
Darrell Brooks also had a right to defend himself without a lawyer and he did a decent job. It's not just about winning. It's about making sure the trial is carried out in a fair way, even just to get a fair sentence. A legal defense ensures a person's reputation is completely accurate whether or not they're guilty. Otherwise the prosecution gets away with tacking on extraneous charges. Defense lawyers and those who choose to defend themselves should not be attacked for presenting a defense.
First everyone was attacking this public defender and criticizing him for being appointed to represent Bryan. But this man obviously understands the importance of presumption of innocence and having to be proven guilty beyond any and all reasonable doubt. He has more common sense than most people in the Untied States and that's scary.
Thank you sir for your work.
He doesn't understand attorney-client privilege though.
If he was innocent he wouldn't agree to sit in jail for 6months.
He has to walk around with a bulletproof vest because there are so many gun nuts wanting to kill him. The safest place for him is in jail. Gun nuts don't believe in innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. They shoot to kill and ask questions later. Every gun owner thinks they have a right to kill without trial, jury or judge and that's why they own a Lethal Weapon
hes gathering evidence. this is the legal process at work
he has to follow the court process. You don't just stand up and say "excuse me judge, I'm innocent therefore I'm out of here. See yah! Try to stop me, buddy." It doesn't work like that. Sorry.
How would an innocent person set himself free in that situation?
Lovely man. A fair trial is now of upmost importance. Obviously the horror of Ethan, Xana, Maddie and Kaylee’s murders have happened. We wish they hadn’t!!! But here we are, now onto the next process of this horror. Bryan’s Kohberger just like everyone deserves a fair trial. I prayed so much for the victims, now I pray for Bryan Kohbergers family, and the kids families always, they are all in a pain I can only imagine and hopefully never realise. 🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️🙏♥️
Amen to everything you shared, I have also been praying for Bryan-- specifically for his salvation. If God can reach someone like Saul/Paul in the Bible then there is hope for Bryan too. We must blanket everyone in prayer.
@@cbebop5 There's no evidence so stop assuming.
@@lizb4156 Praying for you too friend 🙏🏾❤️
He has been convicted in public opinion so even if he was proven innocent his life is over
Everything this lawyer said I agreed with. Almost all the evidence seemed circumstantial to me when I first saw the affidavit. And I do think he has the right to a fair trial . It makes me sick reading comments when people were already finding him guilty because of his appearance and major. . . There’s always 3 sides to the story. Prosecution Defense and the Truth… hopefully The jury or judge can discern the true justice.
Out of curiosity then, what do you make of the DNA on the knife sheath found next to Madison’s body that, when compared with Bryan’s dad’s DNA, does not exclude his father from being the suspect’s father, yet excludes 99.9998% of the male population?
Great comment! I wholeheartedly agree.
@@la1131 I don’t….. that’s what the trial is for. We’ve only seen a tip of the iceberg. I guess we’ll have to hear what defense is presented
@@la1131 didn't you hear his lawyer explain that away? Go back and listen
@@la1131 because its touch dna which means that type of dna could have been on that sheath many months prior to the murders. And also that its just the knife sheath and not the actual weapon this can easily be argued in court that it doesnt mean he actually killed the victims.
Isn’t this lawyer subject to the gag order?? Regardless, I’m so glad a defense perspective is being shared. I think the fair trial element has to be kept in the public’s mind.
Apparently since he’s outside Idaho he’s fair game, and these talking heads are going to keep having him emit pablum. He can’t say anything substantively because he has no access beyond public records. Questions like ”Are you going to stay in touch with Bryan?” are simply beyond comprehension.
A 'gag-order' is for those who are participating in the court proceedings.
Would have been interested to hear his thoughts on the surveillance of the suspect cleaning his vehicle at 4am at his parent’s house and using the neighbor’s garbage to dispose of items
May the person who never tossed their garbage in the neighbors garbage can, and who never suffered from insomnia and did something crazy like wash their car or paint their bedroom in the middle of the night, may that person be the first you know to have led the perfect, sinless life! You would win the prize as the "king of garbage collection knowledge" and "God's timekeeper of every act we do that doesn't concern you". Hope they put you on the jury, so you can convict this "very, very guilty" person and be a witness to his execution. Please stop and re-think your position. Peace!
I personally have used a neighbors trash bin when mine was full, with permission of course. And it was also my understanding that he went to the trash can at 4am, he was washing his car (winter in ID and PA) during the day. I also know quite a few people that are up at 4am everyday to get a head start on the day. All of this at this point is circumstantial.
Unreal! Yes “innocent until proven guilty “ BUT he CLEARLY did it, stop insulting the families who’ve lost their innocent children to this monster!
They have MUCH more evidence to convict I’m sure of
Where was that information released from?
@@danielzielke9997 How does playing Devils advocate benefit anyone in this situation? If not him, WHO killed them. Why was his DNA on at the scene? Why was he stalking them for months? Be serious.
How can he possibly receive a fair trial in that community where no presumption of innocence exists?
The American jury system is a bit problematic compared to systems where professionals judges are more responsible to deliver justice but still many people are be capable to hold that assumption and give him a fair trial in that area too. The people who can’t are the loudest but not everyone loose their ability to think clearly and judge the evidence in a fair way. Many realise that emotional jumping to conclusions isn’t justice but works against it.
This guy brought up a lot of good reasons why Brian may be innocent. He changed my perspective on things to be honest.
@@aaayyy1953 well looking like anything doesn't help here
@@aaayyy1953 and you sound judgmental. So does that mean you are? Great logic.
There are very few attorneys qualified
to do DP cases in Idaho. Is she also representing counsel in the Vallow Daybell case?
If for some reason he proves Innocent in June,does that mean the real killer will be running loose. For months? That's scary
I think he will plea guilty!!!
It's only a preliminary any hearing in June. Then comes the arrangement where he will have to plead innocent or guilty. If he pleads innocent the Judge will then schedule the trial.
You're quick huh
@@milissas.8364 🤞 I really hope so.
Unfortunately I think one can be guilty, but if prosecution doesn't have enough of whatever evidence a jury wants to see, a person can walk. I wonder what the statistics show about people who actually committing a crime and walking. I just keep thinking about OJ
I'm not sure why we have " COURT" anymore. People are tried right here and now on the " "NEWS " channel
Tim
Finally a smart and sane person like bryan's ex attorney explaining why the prosecutions case is weak af.
But you don’t know what other evidence they have found, you only know what is in the affidavit. They may find DNA evidence in his car or on the victim’s, we don’t know that yet.
Did they send you the discovery?
@@lilys7431 lol right.
Yes! And it is so sad, this is how Casey Anthony got off. So many people don’t take the time to understand the way it works in a court room. Her prosecutors took it for granted too, I think. But it’s so important to be fair otherwise we end up with all of these innocent people locked up years ago -people that everyone was so sure were guilty on circumstantial evidence and then DNA gets checked and they find out the person was innocent. Sometimes it sucks but it’s so necessary.
He said, "It's a strong circumstantial case." And that's just the evidence they have released. Bryan is done like a dog's dinner
Sometimes it's great to have a defense attorney keep an innocent person out of jail and that's important. Sometimes they're working to get a vicious killer off the hook and I don't think anyone is okay with that. I think he did it and I pray to God he doesn't get a chance to kill someone else's child.
@Shannon May
I agree I believe he did it also, there's too much evidence that points to him being the sole killer, plus what LE hasn't disclosed too much for it to be coincidental
The public opinion could backfire on this case, and cause years of mistrials
Years? Not likely.
Actual Evidence Vs Emotional response
So he is just in prison waiting for the trial? If he is found innocent, I’d imagine a substantial lawsuit.
I would love to see a dozen lawsuits.
I think one of the main reasons for the lawyer asking for the 5 month delay is for the media frenzy to die down. Also possibly to be able to review all the evidence as they are probably still processing some of the physical stuff. I feel terrible for this guys mother. I couldn't imagine one moment your child is a PHD student and on top of the World and then suddenly you get a call that they massacred 4 people! Its mind boggling 😢
His dear mother has to survive this. Because God can give such a test only to people who can handle it , with God's help of course. With unconditional faith in him. 🙏
@@katerynapoydyuk3925 god didn't help those girls at all.
Im afraid there was an obsession with evil in that family. Read two sisters were in a horror movie & mother wrote an autobiography on a serial killer. Not to mention Bryan messed up his mind with heroin years ago.
@@katerynapoydyuk3925 not sure I agree with your theology here. Especially if she is not a believer ?
@@wqv5423ln It was his teacher who wrote the book,not his mother.
Public defenders don’t have a large team to study the evidence
The public is there to give Society the illusion of justice and to guarantee the government gets a conviction. It's the wolf guarding the hen house.
They do in this case.
@@asherhouseman6838 Public defenders are always the worse lawyers because they don’t have the money behind them to hire experts
Barack Obama was a defense attorney
Hillary Clinton was a defense attorney
Johnny Cochran was a defense attorney
Bill Clinton was a defense attorney
Abraham Lincoln was a defense attorney.....
The list is incredibly long and most people would be quite surprised!!!!!
I wouldn’t want this guy talking as my lawyer client privilege confidently out the window with this man lol.
Like I said before, don’t be surprised if he walks free, as of now if I was a jury I am not 100% convicted he did based on then evidence that police provided.
I'm not convinced either. I'm way more suspicious of Dylan.
@@mirosderegil yep, good point. I very open minded, I really want Justice for the victims, but also I need some hard evidence in
Order to put soMeone to sleep and I
Am not convinced yet, hopefully media doesn’t ruin the case. The police changed their story wayyy too many times about this case. I just want to see a fair trail
@@mirosderegil Yes because a 100 pound girl can just go kill 4 people by herself(1 being a male) and on top of that not leave a trace of DNA evidence. What a 20 year old mastermind. And ofcourse she did all this for fun because there is no motive. Oh and the bloody clothes and murder weapon just vanishes into thin air since she never left the property.
@@JTB33b I never said I thought she acted alone. You need to watch more true crime.. you would be surprised at the reality of the world we live in.
Also, you don't know if they don't have any DNA evidence from her.
Just speculation.
1. Kaylee and Madison
The perpetrator enters the house. He pauses at the stairs to make sure no one on the second floor is awake. After this, he makes his way up to the third floor. He opens what he knows to be Kaylee's bedroom, accidently waking up the dog, he realizes she is not in her room. Promptly, he heads across the hall to Madison's bedroom. Kaylee and Madison are slain. (Reason for Theory: The room where the dog was, I would have to presume is the room that Kaylee would normally sleep in, hence accidently waking up the dog when he opened the door.) Interestingly if this is so, the question arises as to why Kaylee was sleeping with Madison that night. Had she been frightened by something or had she gone into Madison's room after they heard someone enter the house as it states in the affidavit.
2. Dylan Mortensen
The perpetrator walks past D.M.'s room because he thinks she was in her usual bedroom, which was on the first floor and automatically assumed the room on the second floor is empty.
3. Xana and Ethan
Now this part of the plot has a few variations which are plausible.
Theory 1: The perpetrator murders Ethan Chapin first, which wakes up Xana, who in shock falls out of bed and onto the floor. Perhaps, the 'It's ok, I'm going to help you' was the perpetrators attempt at coaxing her into not fleeing in the pretenses of saving Ethan Chapin.
Theory 2: Xana had ordered Door Dash at roughly 3: 40 pm. (this is documented) While she is eating her meal, Xana is disturbed by the commotion upstairs and upon inspection, she sees the perpetrator in the house with the knife. He is compelled to kill her because she is now a witness. Xana runs back into the bedroom, where she is attacked first, after which, Ethan Chapin is murdered. If this is the case, then Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin are victims by circumstance. This would explain why he would not bother going to the first floor of the house. He never intended to kill all four victims.
If this speculation is at all true (remember at this time this is just speculation and a personal opinion) the murderer had to have been someone who was familiar with the houses floor plan and designated rooms prior to the night of the attack. With everything stated above, the murderer had to be someone they knew or someone who had seen the interior of the house previously.
Remember, the murders were committed in an estimated total of 9 minutes. Thinking objectively, enter a random house and try to locate each and every person, stab them to death and without leaving any trace, besides a small 6 mm piece of evidence and one shoe print behind. (DISCLAIMER: If you do decide to literally try this, I am not responsible for your inane behavior.)
Why would the murderer begin with the third floor and work their way down to only the second floor, where they would murder two of the three residents on that same floor? Why, if the murderer was targeting all four of the victims, would the perpetrator leave two potential witnesses behind?
This was clearly a well planned and premeditated operation. The murderer would have had to be aware of Dylan and Bethany living at that residence. The perpetrator did not go into this blindly; which leaves the question of why not remove the possibility of all witnesses- Dylan and Bethany? As for Xana, the possibility that she had physically been seen by the murderer and thus, a known witness, would lead to her and Ethan's removal. In other words, they originally did not intend to kill all residents in the house, rather just one, but due to unforeseen circumstances three out of the four (Kaylee, Madison, Xana and Ethan) had become circumstantial victims.
So, which one was the original victim? A clue might be the first room the murder entered.
Objectively, the way this case has been built seems too hasty and too conveniently simple.
Thoughts?
Easy to get floor plans on homes , zillow , etc. Also, he stalked them and the father said at one time he was actually hooked into their wifi .
@@desertsunset8025 Still does not answer why start on the third floor.
As for stalking: There is no solid evidence that he stalked them besides the phone pings, which are vague in of themselves. Tracking accuracy can vary from 0.25 miles to several miles, depending upon how many obstacles could be blocking the tower's signal. We know the University would put Kohberger well within the ping signal at a range of 0.8 miles from 1122 King Road. This is not substantial enough for evidence of stalking. If you have any other information on the specifics of stalking it would be interesting to read.
As for the house, the images and details were made private after being rented. Even if they were public or accessible, it still does not give enough information for such accuracy. The speed at which the perpetrator entered and navigated the house is still quite questionable. Now if Kohberger is the perpetrator (which is a possibility) had he previously entered the house without their knowledge. Could be a possibility.
Likely BK had an assistant. DM could have some kind of history with BK prior. 🤔
If it was targeted at one person, he'd have to know which room they were in. How can someone who's stalking from a distance know which room, even if he somehow knew the floorplan? In my opinion, he has to have known someone in that house, or made a dry run on a previous night.
@@darkwitnesslxx Exactly my thoughts. When he entered the house it is strange that he would automatically make his way to the third floor. Why not start from the second floor where Xana and Ethan were if his intention was to murder all four.
Impressive interview!
Thank God Monroe county chose Jason LaBar as chief public defender. HIGHLY QUALIFIED .
To use the word exonerated means you were already found guilty...So using that word Is not correct under these are circumstances
No. Exonerated means cleared. No guilt.
Can you imagine an innocent person sitting in prison for 5 months before having a hearing just to determine if he’s going to be held over for trial?
But let's make no mistake about it *DUDE* (Female poser) this is no innocent person *To an absolute 100% certainty*
Care for more Mary Go Round *DUDE* ?
*Waits* For a Reply
if you observe Bryan, he does not look like an evil person. they say the eyes of a person are the windows to his soul. i advise anyone who wants everyone to believe he is a villian, look at his face and demeanor again. He studies so hard and aspires to be in Law Enforcement. He does not come from a rich family. He works as a security and pizza place and teaching assistant. He struggles with depression and drugs etc. Who doesn't? But all these do not make him a murderer. It is the wrongful arrest and the malicious criticism of the media and social media that will make him a murderer. Everyone should be presumed innocent until proven otherwise. What if he would otherwise become a very good cop in Law Enforcement? Was he at the wrong place at the wrong time. We all need to put on our pair of compassionate and objective lens, He is a young man with a very bright future. I just pray God will intervene to help the cop and investigate nail the right person. We must all pray and criticize less.
@@TheChannel1111111111 omg what are you smoking. Good lord.
This TH-cam channel is like law central now haha. Good job guys!
A lawyer I’d not like to have. Talking to the media 2 weeks after he got his check 🤔😒🤷🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤣
Lots of holes.
There really are!
Not really and we don’t even have all the evidence. The lawyer in this video says too that this is a strong circumstantial evidence case.
Yeah, this is going to be interesting… there’s nothing but the car possibly being his, pings, and transfer. I really hope they have something more than that cause essentially that’s the basis on why they arrested him, which is pretty crazy tbo.
I’m glad to see that Monroe county chief public defender is Jason LaBar. Good choice HIGHLY QUALIFIED
Some wild twist will come up. I'm getting slightly uncomfortable with matters.
Sorry this evidence is not 100%, I am not saying he is innocent or guilty, but I hope the trial reveals more evidence because if he’s not the perpetrator, the killer or killers are still out there.
there are other suspicious deaths in the Greek community at that university and officials are tight-lipped and have closed the cases and refuse any questions or inquiries.
I cannot imagine a circumstance under which a public defender *needs* to speak to his client for _FOUR hours,_ in order to handle a simple, interstate extradition case.
@@hollymahler8213 gag order doesn't apply to him, since he is not part of the Idaho defense team and has no inside info...he said he's done
At ;last some truths coming out yay Law and Crime !!
Yes I can't wait for trail to start
He will wait for 6 most because it will likely be a lifetime
Attacking the evidence will be an exercise in futility.
Doesn’t this entire interview go against client confidentiality?! Thought people lost their licenses for these types of things
Yes, could get suspended or disbarred.
If one drop of a victim’s blood is found in the car he’s toast.
This lawyer has brought up all my own personal concerns. I would not be surprised if Bryan is innocent, nor would I be surprised if he is merely a getaway driver and the accomplice is still out there.
At first I saw no way it wasn’t him but the more I think about it the more I realize that the timing of the food being delivered and his car being caught leaving the neighborhood is troubling me.
@@IAmJeka yep, that’s another piece that bothers me as well.
Boy this guy give me chills everytine I see him shudder when he speaks heart goes to friends and families
He's definitely creepy.. And I'm not saying that because of what he's been arrested for.. I'm saying if I met him before all this I would still feel the same.. He has a creepy vibe and his eyes just look empty.. Very strange looking weird guy.. You can actually feel energy from people you meet. That's why if you ever get a gut feeling from someone go with that feeling. People give off energy whether it be negative or positive. Use your senses to judge just that.. These young kids didn't have the chance to make that choice.. The killer is the worst off the lot.. He targeted them like something out of a horror movie like scream. He's sick AF.
@@lisadavie5819 he is clearly disturbed. On reddit's sub about him, someone found his past internet posts describing his psyche.. and those dark energies surely radiate outside his skin. Creepy indeed.
Good someone is doing this kind of interviews as well. All I see everywhere is just one sided opinions on this case. Good interview, thank you!
When he told the police officer that pulled him over that they were going for Thai food ....... seems like they have the right guy. He looked totally freaked out. Time will tell.
what an IGNORANT and UNEDUCATED comment!!
I'm going for Thai food so you got the right guy for murder. What would he have been guilty of if he said they were going for TACOS, a drug dealer? Burgers, rappest? Go play with your cats.