I made a discord server for us where I can share UX/UI tips, potential job connections, frontend knowledge and talk to all you guys! I’d love to get to know all of you and become friends :) discord.gg/QFuTudvccw
Re: Design I know that you want simplicity on your yt channel for that you don't create any playlist GOOD NEWS: now you can turn off your youtube channel "home page" then your channel videos page become your default home page just want a heart❤
So is this the reason why trying to watch a newly uploaded 1080p video from a no-name channel loads slower than a newly uploaded 4k video from a famous channel?
Its known as caching. Many people watch famous channels, that is why their videos 480p/720p/1080p/4K gets cached in local servers. However, when watching not so famous channels, when not many people near you watch those videos, they are not saved in local caching servers. Hence, you have to pull the video data from main servers.
I do hope they don't start deleting old videos. There are plenty of old old videos with pretty much no views that are a portal to a different era of time. They should start by lowering the resolution of newer barely viewed videos from 4k to 1080p. 4k videos use SO much more space than 10 year old, 480p home videos
there are lots of useless videos uploaded daily on yt at 4k quality... A lot of long podcast are uploaded in 4k wich is really overkill... I hope they find a solution and I hope they don't delete older videos.
@@pandazsleeping7038 umm, yah!?😯🤔, maybe?😯, but there is also. a essay or history or explanatory, etc, etc, about anime or movies or video games, comics books or mangas or shows. or even about artists or the people who made a show or movie or anime or video game, or even just interviews,
If the video primarily consists of a single still image or contains very low-entropy content (little movement or detail), you can achieve extremely high compression ratios, often approaching nearly 100%...
$50/TB/month is a crazy stretch. Even with the major object storage cloud providers, it's nowhere close to that, usually around $10-$20/TB/month. With how Google has a top down control over their infrastructure, the actual numbers are magnitudes lower than that. It's probably somewhere around $1-$3/TB/month internally.
Op I think you forgot that you are probably only talking about low tier storage. Because youtube will probably use high tier storage which means expensive.
This is a very difficult dillema. I'd honestly just make paid uploads. x cents per megabyte or something. I host videos myself for friends and family and even tho we're just a few users it's extremely expensive. I don't get why people don't get this.
@@Lilleh__ Which ones? There are none because nobody has the money and infrastructure to provide a service even close in scale to YT. Microsoft and Amazon could do it, but they would never do it the way youtube is now.
They told us 10 years ago it was infinite when they were trying to sell cloud. I hope this shows people the cloud isn't the only answer maybe someday there will be a decentralized self hosted youtube alternative made easy for anyone to use
I would be completely fine with a system that kept videos basically in cryogenic storage, as in the drives don't even need to be powered. While that would sacrifice the on-demandness of unwatched videos, I would speculate that removing power consumption altogether from the drive (until needed, at which point the drive is woken up) will *significantly* improve costs. And this only really has to be for frozen storage, where videos aren't watched for a _long_ time. TH-cam could even put a marker that says that the video is in this type of cryogenic storage. I can't say anything about any downsides or complexity this system could create, or if it's even feasible, but if it ends up way cheaper than what we currently have, I fully support it.
@@0xlognnot rlly u gotta think abt pirating. Like me im not paying for premium with ads jus so they can get more revenue instead of jus implying such simple solutions with slightly longer load times (they’re already blazing fast for me) so a lot of ppl like me have TH-cam plus downloaded to remove ads and such. I would’ve nvr even done this if they didnt add hella more ads that are 60 seconds and not skip able. So they’re more likely losing more money then previous years
One of the downsides is business opportunity. You need a team to implement that and test everything. How does it perform from everywhere in the world? What are the edge cases? How much of the time needs the hard drive to be not running to save more than starting it everytime instead of keeping it running? Do you keep copies in 144, 320, 480, 720, 1080? Your saving relies on the fact that the energy is expensive but that's not really the case. Google has many solar panels to produce its own electricity and has high volume contacts that give them much cheaper electricity than we normal people get. The expensive thing is the infrastructure itself. You need redundancy for everything and many security measures for the facility in which the rack with the hard drives is located. The space is pretty valuable and these costs are the same if the storage device consumes power or not. Which brings me back to the beginning. How much could they save and is it worth the months of the engineering team's time? How much customer satisfaction would they sacrifice if they delete long forgotten videos that nobody has seen?
There are plenty of abandoned channels, but there are also ones with significant legacies that ended with the author, such as Technoblade. I would not want his videos to be deleted by TH-cam.
WAIT A MINUTE...OVER 32% OF UPLOADED VIDEOS TO TH-cam DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE MOVING FRAMES. THEY CAN JUST BE UPLOADED AS MP3. MILLIONS OF GIGS SAVED ALREADY. BUT I GUESS EVERYONE WANTS THERE FACE RECORDED AT 30 FPS WHILE THEYRE SIMPLY TALKING INTO A MIC. CRAZY
In fact, I have reason to believe they already have. I watched videos when I was 11, but when I try to watch those exact same videos, the channels haven’t posted in a very long time, and that video is just gone without explanation. And this happens with other channels too.
TH-cam wants people to have to buy a premium account in order to download videos to their PC. Some people use that feature to save videos they suspect they may want to watch again, but which they fear might be deleted.
Google Cloud is offering Nearline storage to the general public for $9.31 per month (per TB) for very low volume users. So I would assume their larger customers pay closer to $5 and then Google itself pays even less for services like TH-cam, Drive, etc. Maybe $2 per month.
If that’s true, then TH-cam is basically a video version of file hosting sites as well as 4chan. Ditching posterity if you go inactive for a certain period of time, or have hard limits that automatically delete oldest videos when new content gets posted that exceeds the limit.
The reaction channels which use 75% or more of the original content as their own should be discarded...if someone wants to 'react' to other's stuff, they can no longer show the content as a whole... Not only would this increase the quality but also reduce the quantity of lame reaction channels who just slap their own face in the corner... While this won't solve the problem as a whole, it would buy enough time and resources.
And yet, the algorithm encourages quantity over quality to keep people hooked on the site. So that's even more data than would exist if creators didn't feel the need to post every day to maintain the favor of the algorithm. They definitely need to put more research into better solutions for data storage, since deleting videos isn't a good idea. Even a video from 2008 with 30 views could be worth saving.
If someone was wondering ... YES, TH-cam hosts also the original uploaded file... thats the reason, why they can re-encode it every time they come up with a new project ...
The cost estimates presented in this video seem pulled out of thin air. 🙄 Given Google’s massive infrastructure and scale, it’s unlikely that storage costs are truly pushing them to consider outright deleting videos that don’t generate ad revenue. A more plausible scenario, if TH-cam ever needed to offset the cost of archived or low-performing content, would be to introduce optional subscription tiers for additional storage-similar to Google One or Drive. Users who genuinely value preserving their entire back catalog could pay a modest fee, while creators who rely on ads alone wouldn’t lose their content. It’s an approach that would balance user needs and business interests, rather than resorting to something as drastic and unpopular as mass deletions. Don't you think? 🤷♂
They should make TH-cam a mandatory monthly subscription. At this point everyone would pay $10 a month or whatever for access to the largest libeary of video content and entertainment ever.
google uses aws ? or why do they need to pay the same price for the data that one would be charged by their data centres and not a bit less… but i get your point about the cumulative effect compounding the costs… 😮
as for the ad revenue thats really on youtube and they could fix that if they wanted to. they decided to not show any ads until you meet their rather high requirement checklist which most video uploaders wont be able to meet
TH-cam already shows ads on some small channels and doesnt pay the creator anything if they're not in the partner program i ahve a channel like that. So i'd prefer they didnt advertise on small channels honestly.
I can’t imagine living without TH-cam or paid TH-cam, and also it’s weird to see information about TH-cam on TH-cam 😂🎉🎉 well you are Woking too hard for providing us some new spicy 🌶️ knowledge Well I can say only thank you 🙏 ❤ I appreciate you hard work And also I want to say only this thing that earning money is not every thing!
you can't really compare the price of public offerings like aws with a company self hosting their data in their own datacenters. its far cheaper as they only have to pay once for the hardware and not monthly like a normal customer renting cloud capacity
well if people didnt bypass ads maybe then youtube wouldnt have issues with keeping profits up. just cuz its backed by a trillion $ company doesnt mean they'll operate at a loss
Well the answer is not 60 second not skip able ads. More users then ever (self included) are just downloading TH-cam plus ipas or ad blockers. There’s a few comments that would easily fix their revenue issues. Think abt it I would’ve nvr got TH-cam plus without them increasing the ads and even on premium🤷♂️
i worked for Google..100million yearly is spend on gadgets and accessories food and other many many stupid stuff to employees and they don't even cough😅😅😅😅
None of this data-removal business is necessary. What if there was a way easier and more efficient way to handle the situation? I might have a solution, but it’s gonna sound weird. Step 1: Google announces that they will implement the AdSense Partnership Program For Corporations (APPFC) meaning they redirect specific content to specific platforms to aim for a bigger target audience through multiple servers. Step 2: After a few months the APPFC-model is finished and data will be transferred to other platforms. Step 3: Google announces that “TH-cam” will rebrand itself to “Google Videos” at the next update of the app, with different types of content being available on different servers across the globe.
@@PrograError or perhaps it’s an idea worth considering? Think about it: if TH-cam is a collection of video-links that redirect to other platforms, specifically focused on “Gaming” “Tutorials” “News” “Tech” and so on, they are basically doing the same thing as what “Google Videos” is doing currently; redirecting to other websites. And they already work under the same company. So to me, changing the name to “Google Videos” altogether makes sense. But yeah, to each their own opinion.
@@teegardenbunpopular opinion they should delete mrbeasts videos because his videos are fake he doesn't give people money for videos he pretends to for the video
I gotta give it to you. Your ad for your Discord channel is probably the most annoying ad spot I have encountered in a long time. I don't even know what is so anoying about it but I feel like closing the video every time I hear it.
I made a discord server for us where I can share UX/UI tips, potential job connections, frontend knowledge and talk to all you guys! I’d love to get to know all of you and become friends :)
discord.gg/QFuTudvccw
it's cool
0:06 😢😢
Re: Design I know that you want simplicity on your yt channel
for that you don't create any playlist
GOOD NEWS: now you can turn off your youtube channel "home page"
then your channel videos page become your default home page
just want a heart❤
So is this the reason why trying to watch a newly uploaded 1080p video from a no-name channel loads slower than a newly uploaded 4k video from a famous channel?
The 4k video will have copies on servers more local to you, as you have a higher chance to have someone local who also wanted the video fetched.
Its known as caching. Many people watch famous channels, that is why their videos 480p/720p/1080p/4K gets cached in local servers. However, when watching not so famous channels, when not many people near you watch those videos, they are not saved in local caching servers. Hence, you have to pull the video data from main servers.
That's just because of the CDN, not the storage speeds.
Fun fact: Without TH-cam compression, you would require about 1Gbps internet speed to stream a 1080p video in original quality and bitrate.
Noice my adhd loves finding comments like this
*FFMPEG compression.
this
@@avishjha4030 *h264/vp9/av1
@avishjha4030 is so smart
I do hope they don't start deleting old videos. There are plenty of old old videos with pretty much no views that are a portal to a different era of time. They should start by lowering the resolution of newer barely viewed videos from 4k to 1080p. 4k videos use SO much more space than 10 year old, 480p home videos
Yeah, infact it might be possible to smoothly stream lossless 480p video on average internet.
4k is way overkill. It's wasteful.
😮😮😮…
They won't delete them.
@@kit888 Well then they'll need to increase 1080 quality and NOT put it behind a premium paywall
there are lots of useless videos uploaded daily on yt at 4k quality... A lot of long podcast are uploaded in 4k wich is really overkill... I hope they find a solution and I hope they don't delete older videos.
umm, what about jawed karim, me at zoo, and other video old videos from youtube history?,
Yeah like a still image of a podcast logo doesn't need 4k
@@pandazsleeping7038 umm, yah!?😯🤔, maybe?😯, but there is also. a essay or history or explanatory, etc, etc, about anime or movies or video games, comics books or mangas or shows. or even about artists or the people who made a show or movie or anime or video game, or even just interviews,
If the video primarily consists of a single still image or contains very low-entropy content (little movement or detail), you can achieve extremely high compression ratios, often approaching nearly 100%...
From deleting duplicate videos, or 10hr long videos from one song on repeat, they will clear some space
Like how some people randomly reupload others' content like trailers for no reason, they would benefit greatly from a "retweet" option.
$50/TB/month is a crazy stretch. Even with the major object storage cloud providers, it's nowhere close to that, usually around $10-$20/TB/month. With how Google has a top down control over their infrastructure, the actual numbers are magnitudes lower than that. It's probably somewhere around $1-$3/TB/month internally.
50 UDS will buy me new 1tb HDD every month, or new SSD every 2 month.
@@Andrii87 £200 bought me a 4tb pcie 4.0 SSD 3 weeks ago.
The author just pull the values out of thin air, lol.
That is actually possible. Don't forget that streams also become video. So this is not surprising.
Op I think you forgot that you are probably only talking about low tier storage.
Because youtube will probably use high tier storage which means expensive.
I wish TH-cam to not delete videos to save on storage, maybe consider instead lowering the quality and thus the file size of videos.
I was about to comment the same thing. Just delete, for example, the quality above 720p for videos with less than x views in the last x days
I agree
seeing old videos from 10-15 years ago just feel like watching history
This is a very difficult dillema. I'd honestly just make paid uploads. x cents per megabyte or something.
I host videos myself for friends and family and even tho we're just a few users it's extremely expensive. I don't get why people don't get this.
@@l4rkdono Or maybe make uploading low quality free, but you have to pay to upload higher qualities.
@@Monkeymario. Sure, that works. LIke I'm sure TH-cam has the means of figuring out something better than to delete videos
TH-cam is so essentially to society that governments would need to get involved in order to keep this revolutionary platform from being sunset.
No they won't because they can't.
If yt shut down then ppl could just move to alternative sites.
@@Lilleh__ Which ones? There are none because nobody has the money and infrastructure to provide a service even close in scale to YT. Microsoft and Amazon could do it, but they would never do it the way youtube is now.
@@lbgstzockt8493 I said alternatives, not competitors. Yt isn't the only video sharing site in the world, which means there are competitors.
You can have other sites though. Or youtube can partner with one.
They told us 10 years ago it was infinite when they were trying to sell cloud. I hope this shows people the cloud isn't the only answer maybe someday there will be a decentralized self hosted youtube alternative made easy for anyone to use
I would be completely fine with a system that kept videos basically in cryogenic storage, as in the drives don't even need to be powered. While that would sacrifice the on-demandness of unwatched videos, I would speculate that removing power consumption altogether from the drive (until needed, at which point the drive is woken up) will *significantly* improve costs. And this only really has to be for frozen storage, where videos aren't watched for a _long_ time. TH-cam could even put a marker that says that the video is in this type of cryogenic storage. I can't say anything about any downsides or complexity this system could create, or if it's even feasible, but if it ends up way cheaper than what we currently have, I fully support it.
my guess is this would lose them more in revenue than it's worth
@@0xlognnot rlly u gotta think abt pirating. Like me im not paying for premium with ads jus so they can get more revenue instead of jus implying such simple solutions with slightly longer load times (they’re already blazing fast for me) so a lot of ppl like me have TH-cam plus downloaded to remove ads and such. I would’ve nvr even done this if they didnt add hella more ads that are 60 seconds and not skip able. So they’re more likely losing more money then previous years
One of the downsides is business opportunity. You need a team to implement that and test everything. How does it perform from everywhere in the world? What are the edge cases? How much of the time needs the hard drive to be not running to save more than starting it everytime instead of keeping it running? Do you keep copies in 144, 320, 480, 720, 1080? Your saving relies on the fact that the energy is expensive but that's not really the case. Google has many solar panels to produce its own electricity and has high volume contacts that give them much cheaper electricity than we normal people get. The expensive thing is the infrastructure itself. You need redundancy for everything and many security measures for the facility in which the rack with the hard drives is located. The space is pretty valuable and these costs are the same if the storage device consumes power or not. Which brings me back to the beginning. How much could they save and is it worth the months of the engineering team's time? How much customer satisfaction would they sacrifice if they delete long forgotten videos that nobody has seen?
I think it will be more expensive.
Drives fail less often when they stay spinning.
Saving you 12 minutes and 49 seconds:
Storage is expensive and youtube might have to start deleting videos soon
Nah, I watched the entire video and learned a lot, specially as a software engineer with interest in the cloud.
Nothing online is forever. Download and archive anything of value to you.
I think this video could have used more research. 50$/TB per month is crazy, real number is probably 1/100th of that if not lower.
Yea, I can buy a TB of storage for 50$
There are plenty of abandoned channels, but there are also ones with significant legacies that ended with the author, such as Technoblade. I would not want his videos to be deleted by TH-cam.
WAIT A MINUTE...OVER 32% OF UPLOADED VIDEOS TO TH-cam DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE MOVING FRAMES. THEY CAN JUST BE UPLOADED AS MP3. MILLIONS OF GIGS SAVED ALREADY. BUT I GUESS EVERYONE WANTS THERE FACE RECORDED AT 30 FPS WHILE THEYRE SIMPLY TALKING INTO A MIC. CRAZY
lyric videos, audiobooks, sleep aids, white noise, etc. I agree there's definitely room to save though.
that shouldn't be problem tho? youtube should have video compression
I don't understand why they make anything higher than 1080p.
4K? 8K? Come on!
Full HD is just enough.
1080 is good, but in mob8le devices only. I use an 8k tv and I'm telling you 1080 is so fvking unwatchable.
Well youtube should make 1080P watchable and not just lock it behind a paywall
In fact, I have reason to believe they already have.
I watched videos when I was 11, but when I try to watch those exact same videos, the channels haven’t posted in a very long time, and that video is just gone without explanation. And this happens with other channels too.
Some are probably privated by the channel. A channel that does not post is not a channel that is unused by it's owners.
TH-cam wants people to have to buy a premium account in order to download videos to their PC. Some people use that feature to save videos they suspect they may want to watch again, but which they fear might be deleted.
Exactly what I'm doing right now. F*ck TH-cam Premium, I'm using YT-DLP
How does youtube exist :
Short answer : A lot of ads
Google Cloud is offering Nearline storage to the general public for $9.31 per month (per TB) for very low volume users. So I would assume their larger customers pay closer to $5 and then Google itself pays even less for services like TH-cam, Drive, etc. Maybe $2 per month.
You know: if they only limited new channels to once-a-month uploads, then you earn or pay your way up from there -- once-a-week, once-a-day.
nope, maybe once or twice a day? i feel like once a month would just kill new channels
once a month is too harsh
If that’s true, then TH-cam is basically a video version of file hosting sites as well as 4chan. Ditching posterity if you go inactive for a certain period of time, or have hard limits that automatically delete oldest videos when new content gets posted that exceeds the limit.
1:35 Deconding
I wasn't the only one to see it
This video made me look at my adblocker
Now you understand
you know YT could have compressed this video better if you havent used unnecessary stock footage
They can delete the ads, they will have so much space then.
They could start with videos that have titles like “IMG 512” that also have less than 3 views.
Gavin Belson predicted this "datageddon"
😂😂Yeah
The reaction channels which use 75% or more of the original content as their own should be discarded...if someone wants to 'react' to other's stuff, they can no longer show the content as a whole...
Not only would this increase the quality but also reduce the quantity of lame reaction channels who just slap their own face in the corner...
While this won't solve the problem as a whole, it would buy enough time and resources.
Just to clarify, I don't think they'll delete the videos soon.
And yet, the algorithm encourages quantity over quality to keep people hooked on the site. So that's even more data than would exist if creators didn't feel the need to post every day to maintain the favor of the algorithm. They definitely need to put more research into better solutions for data storage, since deleting videos isn't a good idea. Even a video from 2008 with 30 views could be worth saving.
If someone was wondering ... YES, TH-cam hosts also the original uploaded file... thats the reason, why they can re-encode it every time they come up with a new project ...
also, thats reason, how YT could encode video to 1080p nowadays that was uploaded in year when YT didnt allow more than 480p encoding ...
Not anymore. They now have a 30 day limit since a few years ago.
Yeah, and you can still download the original files in Google Takeout :D
The cost estimates presented in this video seem pulled out of thin air. 🙄
Given Google’s massive infrastructure and scale, it’s unlikely that storage costs are truly pushing them to consider outright deleting videos that don’t generate ad revenue. A more plausible scenario, if TH-cam ever needed to offset the cost of archived or low-performing content, would be to introduce optional subscription tiers for additional storage-similar to Google One or Drive. Users who genuinely value preserving their entire back catalog could pay a modest fee, while creators who rely on ads alone wouldn’t lose their content. It’s an approach that would balance user needs and business interests, rather than resorting to something as drastic and unpopular as mass deletions. Don't you think? 🤷♂
They should make TH-cam a mandatory monthly subscription. At this point everyone would pay $10 a month or whatever for access to the largest libeary of video content and entertainment ever.
google
uses aws ? or why do they need to pay the same price for the data that one would be charged by their data centres and not a bit less… but i get your point about the cumulative effect compounding the costs… 😮
you didn't mention the monthly subscription for youtube premium/YT music
On Vimeo, new users are allotted 1GB of free space as of 2024, which applies to old users of Vimeo who haven't uploaded any videos till date.
Maybe that’s why I can never find an old video anymoee
That’s fine there’s always newer you tube videos in our future
They should delete the deleted data first.
Funfact 21,600,000 GB (Gigabytes) is worth 21.6 PB (Petabytes) which is fucking large, im pretty sure that youtube has almost a yottabyte in videos
Great job, love the videos
Content farms:
quadratic storage cost is crazy
TH-cam might delete this video soon
as for the ad revenue thats really on youtube and they could fix that if they wanted to. they decided to not show any ads until you meet their rather high requirement checklist which most video uploaders wont be able to meet
TH-cam already shows ads on some small channels and doesnt pay the creator anything if they're not in the partner program i ahve a channel like that. So i'd prefer they didnt advertise on small channels honestly.
thank you for this helpful explanation
They need to use the Middle-out algorithm.
T = 800 x MJT/4
I can’t imagine living without TH-cam or paid TH-cam, and also it’s weird to see information about TH-cam on TH-cam 😂🎉🎉 well you are Woking too hard for providing us some new spicy 🌶️ knowledge
Well I can say only thank you 🙏 ❤ I appreciate you hard work
And also I want to say only this thing that earning money is not every thing!
you can't really compare the price of public offerings like aws with a company self hosting their data in their own datacenters. its far cheaper as they only have to pay once for the hardware and not monthly like a normal customer renting cloud capacity
well if people didnt bypass ads maybe then youtube wouldnt have issues with keeping profits up. just cuz its backed by a trillion $ company doesnt mean they'll operate at a loss
Hey Everyone.
Hi Lucas
@@CookieXD1998My chiken in your neck :D
Hello everybody
Your work is amazing
fym by a "page" of video data😭
Where do you have the numbers from?
Well the answer is not 60 second not skip able ads. More users then ever (self included) are just downloading TH-cam plus ipas or ad blockers. There’s a few comments that would easily fix their revenue issues. Think abt it I would’ve nvr got TH-cam plus without them increasing the ads and even on premium🤷♂️
"A cloud infrastructure" are you using translation? Which platform are you using for a voice actor?
Better invent a new video format to reduce size or cut 4k videos they're not that necessary
Have you ever watched a 1080p video on a 55 inch or bigger tv? Then it would be obvious to you why 4k is necessary
Yeah, it's just so simple to create a new video "format".
@@avishjha4030 Google created webm its not widely used so yea
@@diano5255the average person doesn't have a 55inch television
gonna need me that background piano song
omg I need 1.3 billion gb of storage in my pc xDD
What would u do with it
Thank you
i worked for Google..100million yearly is spend on gadgets and accessories food and other many many stupid stuff to employees and they don't even cough😅😅😅😅
Thats why youtube Removed the Oldest Video Filter button buy later added it again after a year when people protested
This is a very well made and informative video, you deserve a sub
hey what's the name of the background music you use?
it's a cool video am a video editor
millions in maintenance cost billions in revenue
Im not first neither last
TH-cam should instead make a bitcoin like storage for videos and views act as a profit. A video nft of sorts.
Selling Your Data to ADVERTISERS
None of this data-removal business is necessary. What if there was a way easier and more efficient way to handle the situation? I might have a solution, but it’s gonna sound weird.
Step 1:
Google announces that they will implement the AdSense Partnership Program For Corporations (APPFC) meaning they redirect specific content to specific platforms to aim for a bigger target audience through multiple servers.
Step 2:
After a few months the APPFC-model is finished and data will be transferred to other platforms.
Step 3:
Google announces that “TH-cam” will rebrand itself to “Google Videos” at the next update of the app, with different types of content being available on different servers across the globe.
Step 3 is as stupid as Elon's rebrand of Twitter to X
@@PrograError or perhaps it’s an idea worth considering? Think about it: if TH-cam is a collection of video-links that redirect to other platforms, specifically focused on “Gaming” “Tutorials” “News” “Tech” and so on, they are basically doing the same thing as what “Google Videos” is doing currently; redirecting to other websites. And they already work under the same company. So to me, changing the name to “Google Videos” altogether makes sense. But yeah, to each their own opinion.
@@teegardenb i agree with you
@@teegardenb i would rather that than them delete videos what if they delete older videos i hope not
@@teegardenbunpopular opinion they should delete mrbeasts videos because his videos are fake he doesn't give people money for videos he pretends to for the video
Woa re: design 20k subs
I gotta give it to you. Your ad for your Discord channel is probably the most annoying ad spot I have encountered in a long time. I don't even know what is so anoying about it but I feel like closing the video every time I hear it.
yes i hope youtube will start deleting videos
great vid
🔥
THE BEST TH-cam CHANNEL IN THE WHOLE WORLD.♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
Now are lost media
Probady nobody would care if videos that were not wached in 5 years by a single person would be deleted.
No!!! They can't delete the two-hour video in memory of my ❤beloved❤ dead turtle, Mildred, the best friend I ever had.😢😢😢
Neat!
Make useless old videos 480p they only take MB's
Is there a way to download your entire channel in batch for free?
im goanna need to sub ngl
Last
First
Are you really a girl? 😮
you're weird
bruh
Diddy
Don’t baby oil us
Bro surprised