Be thankful that Russia doesn't fry terrorist satellites with the world's most powerful lasers. If Syria, 30% of whose territory is occupied by the United States, had such lasers, they would probably have used them long ago. Russians are very peace-loving.
You think they were forced to cooperate like AT&T back in the days of the cold war? If so reporters may find documented court cases on that subject. I think Musk would consider Star Link his private property and is by heart a republican who doesn't want government setting foot on his property. Which may but also explain why russia has access to star link. Not only because republicans are quite cozy with russia, but due to the self image of a self made man who sells to anyone who wants to buy ... which may therefor be seen as breaking sanctions if not worse.
@@kinngrimm his business Space X is a USA governmant conrtractor and is star link currently going throught testing with the USA militray. The government can get all the access they want
@@kinngrimm Seems you watch too much mainstream. Republican and Democrats both love the government. You have to look at their actions to how much both love the government. Republican's will go on mainstream media and say they don't like federal government but in reality they love it. They're basically the same party with few ideological differences who are trying to get as much power as you can.
@@kinngrimm You think Elon Musk is a republican? Are you serious? Someone who supports universal basic income and a tax on carbon emissions? Stop eating out of the hand of media outlets and think for yourself.
reminded me I read about the Korean war.. UN troops were surprised that Chinese were firing Tommy guns at them. i want to use the same analogy.. like a tommy gun, you dont need to be an American to use it.. turned out the US provided them during the Chinese Civil War to KMT... were all lost. same idea with the starlink
The right title should be: “Starlink faces difficulty disabling Russian use in Ukraine battlefield”. Can’t be more clear about the essence of this video, but instead WSJ chose to be blurry.
Clickabe titles are prio #1, very sad too see even from Journalistic channels like this, I want truth not clickability :/, watching the video does explain the misinformation though.
6 หลายเดือนก่อน
@@zperdek cause that's quite far from the frontline (60m+) - easy to detect
Ukraine could host a database that contains records for each Starlink terminal they currently operate. Starlink could then cross reference each terminal they know to be operating in Ukraine with that database and disable those that do not have corresponding records in the database. There are some obvious downsides to this, such as needing to securely maintain these records and the need to keep track of every Starlink terminal (both civilian and military), but it's a start.
Lol, you have Russian assets within Ukraine and there is corruption there. So, don’t be surprised if someone enters the data of the terminal sold to russia as well
Terminal will be hacked and spoofed anyway no matter what you do on the software things. Unless Starlink takes into account the security for hardware hacking up to very decent level in the first place, Russians will break through the system eventually and consistently.
To be fair, i think it was done pretty well. It probably could have been researched more, as some small (non significant) details were left out, but, it got the point across in a neutral way.
@@sebastianorye2702 Musk works hand in glove with the military through SpaceX, the chance they would let him help Russia is 0%. Anybody with a brain could come to that conclusion.
Not really? Just because you get triggered at titles that you automatically assume are negative does not mean that is reality. The title of the video is 100% accurate, it in no way said it was Elon Musk's fault or said that he did anything wrong. It is entirely on you for assuming as such, and really points to your personality.
Seems like a StarLink terminal would be a good indicator of a command and control element of the Russian armed forces. Not sure it I’d want a calling card in the patio or balcony of the structure I’m using.
Those who didn't learn to put their radiowave emitters/receiver on some distance from their actual location are not alive after 2 years of war. That goes for both sides. Not only starlinks, but other antennas as well
Nah farm just like the Ukrainian they would just give starlink terminals for mobile recon units and drone squads while HQ elements will use the big boy military grade stuffs
The allow list section is so stupid. You can only connect to Starlink through their terminals. All terminals are manufactured by Starlink and are sold by them or authorized sellers, therefore all terminals are allowed by default. This does not help to determine whether a terminal is transferred to an unauthorized party.
There is nothing stupid about this. You just don’t understand it. Starlink supports the Ukrainian Military. They can easily get a list of all the device id‘s which the Ukrainians own. All other devices near the front line will be disabled.
@@Rollmops94there is no list. commerical and private entities have been donating starlink to ukrainian soldiers since the beginning. there are thousands of units not registered with the ukrainian army. there is no ukrainian army starlink terminal database.
@@bardgold4553 First of all: How do you know? I am 99 percent certain you don’t know how the Ukrainian military handled these things. Then there is communication. Even if such a list does not exist it is actually pretty easy to create such a list. The Ukrainians could look for an id in their devices and report it back. Devices could have their id read automatically when communicating over a secure Ukrainian channel/server. Why talk so much when you clearly don’t have any knowledge to back anything up? Are you that desperate?
Ukraine would literally have no communication without Elon Musks Starlink service. The Ukraine government should be a little more thankful for the help and support they received. They seem to be irritating the Polish farmers as well.
They already have to pinpoint the terminals in order to steer the data beam to them. It’s not a problem of determining where terminals are but determining who they belong to. SpaceX would have to somehow keep track of the dynamic front line across thousands of km in real time.
@@Rudmin No they dont. If someone access to starlink, they know exact location of it. Everyone knows where borders are, so its not hard to determine what belongs to soviets and who belongs to west.
They knew roughly where the borders were before 2022. Now it’s a constantly changing frontline and nobody knows exactly where the contact line is at all times.
Would you trust critical traffic to a system from a company that's based in an adversarial country? I wouldn't. I'd assume the NSA is reading every message.
This war is going create a lot of controversy. I just have a bad feeling that this war is going to turn into a lot bigger war that we don’t want to happen.
This issue is so much more complex than this stupid WSJ video implies. They would have you believe that the Russians simply go to their local illegal electronics store, pick up a Starlink terminal, carry it the front and use it to wage war on Ukraine. The Starlink networks knows when any online terminal is in view of any satellite and where it is located exactly. It is easy to geo-fence any terminal, given that they allowed it to connect in the first place. Now ask yourself what do you want to do with that knowledge. You can either deny it access, or permit it access. If you permit it access, you can track it's location, collect intelligence on it, etc. If you choose to deny it access, you may be doing more harm than good. Personally, firing up a Starlink terminal without understanding that big brother knows exactly what you are doing and where you are sounds like a Wily Coyote move to me. So for the WSJ to imply that this situation is bad without any analysis, is just irresponsible.
for all the cybersecurity professionals out there who didn’t catch that “allowlist” is just a more inclusive term for “whitelist”. An analogous term for a “blacklist” would be “blocklist”
You're coming from the wrong direction, its not the Iranian Governemnt approving it. It's the U.S. allowing its operation to help foment unrest. Surely you don't think something as expensive as launching 1000's of satellites into space is getting paid for by civilian users right? lol
This awkward situation for starlink, if they were to admit they could produce an acurate map of where each terminal was, you could have a country that banned them demanding the map so they could hunt down people using them to get the uncensored (rather than government version) of the internet
Yeah, but Starlink is incorporated in America, and their payments are handled in American jurisdiction. Starlink has zero legal obligation to fulfill such requests, since their service is technically illegal in such regimes already
@@backacheache What he is saying is that Elon Musk does not have to give any information to anyone. Also the video already said that Starlink knows the devices locations. It is also obvious that it can know, because each Satellite obviously knows what ground devices it is connected to. The rest is just a triangulation algorithm and then you know the location.
WSJ never misses an opportunity to take a jab at Elon. I’ve seen WSJ ads on Facebook to promoted articles they’ve put out specifically for hit pieces against Elon.
After all the billions 🧼 thought corrupt Ukraine 🇺🇦 Now the internet 🛜 is the major advantage. Take care of the southern border Trump 2024 Cheers from west Africa 🦅
🛰🇺🇦 Fascinating insight from WSJ on Ukraine's claim that Russia is using Starlink. Elon Musk's satellites continue to shape geopolitics, highlighting the intersection of technology and global affairs. 🚀🌐
Nothing incredible about it. It was invented in 1980s. It's never caught on because it's slow. It's primarily used in emergencies where regular infrastructure is destroyed and by the military. No one else bothered to send as many satellites in space because they satellites don't have long lifespan and it's a massive money sink hole. StarLink operates at a large loss. Once satellites need repairs, I'm sure they'll abandon it. Since replacing will cost like 30+ billion and that is on the low end. Only the US military has the resources to maintain so many satellites hence why you get free GPS--thanks to the government. Business wise it's not a smart idea. StarLink is not even the first. There are other smaller companies who've been doing this for years but they don't cover as large of an area as StarLink because it's a waste of money.
@@manchuratt8900 No, Starlink is becoming a geyser of cash. It has been cashflow positive since 2022. Revenue is expected to be $10bn in 2024. An IPO is planned for the next two or three years. You're spouting pure misinformation. No, wait: _pure disinformation._
@@manchuratt8900I think I read the satellites only last five years and they just deorbit them. You're right, it's very expensive to maintain this kind of infrastructure.
Even using user authentication, furthermore with photo ID, they still can fake it, either forgery or borrowing it. Devices allow list, they still can stole it or use third party vendors. Basically Starlink still on hot fire whatever they do.
That would make Starlink participant in the war and a legitimate target, probably explains the latest news related to Russia and weapons in Space Things keep getting more interesting, 2024 might be most interesting year yet.
Its all just bs propaganda Russia have been able to shoot down satellites since 2021 whit systems like s500, this super super nuke space wepon is just media trying to spread fear for the agenda
You are mistaken, this is not Starlink. This is TSARLINK. Designed by Ivan Maskovsky. However, starlink for maritime is said to be working in some parts of Russia.
Another issue not identified in this article is how does Starlink know if a terminal has been supplied by the Ukranians but subsequently captured by the Russians. A very tricky situation that could only really be sorted by actively denying both sides access to the network.
@@Jad-TV Didn't they? They ripped apart the peace treaty, so they made a deliberate decision to go to war with Russia instead of becoming a neutral country with all its territory intact. How exactly was that in the best interest of the people and country of Ukraine? Reality is much more complicated than the story they like to tell you on CNN over and over again. Every government needs to sell their war to its people somehow but this war was a clear choice from the west. It could have easily been prevented but war was the goal. Now they got their wish and Ukraine is being destroyed. All sides are just as guilty to the situation we see today. There is no good vs bad, it's only bad vs bad.
Just share the (appr.) Locations of all starlink terminals within the Ukrainian borders to the Ukrainian military and the Russians wont be using them anymore
They already do block some regions. I recall Elon said they blocked some geo locations where Ukrainian's were using it for drones. StarLink already operates a big loss, I guess they don't want to lose more customers.
That would be like tank and weapons manufacturing being responsible for reclaiming them after they have been stolen. There's nothing they can do about it
This is not correct since a tank or weapon can't be remotely deactivated, nor geofenced either, Starlink can. SpaceX knows when Starlink is being used by Russians, they just don't care.
You should laser focus on a Ukraine and Russia conflict as it doesn't affect you in any way But don't you dare focus on what your own government do .. politicians, media, presidents, money spending, secret services and agencies, privacy, prices and so on that touches each one of you directly. It makes sense right ? just let the media tell you what to think and social media what to buy, earn, spend, die.. but first obey
In the beginning of this mess Didn't elon support Ukraine with starlink and now supports Russia ? If this is correct than maybe He pretended to help Ukraine , while helping Russia ? Please let me know if im incorrect because I just want to know the truth.
Plot twist SpaceX gives all user info to pentagon and pentagon wants Russia to continue using starling.
Twist?😂😂
No but seriously that’s where my money is
plus their locations can be traced to local command centres and soldiers locations.
starling? is that chinese knockoff of starlink?
@GraniteInTheFace Russia let China do the hacking inside China, what of it you can do?
@@dharmdevil no it's my Microsoft keyboard being a dingus and autocorrecting me when I wasnt wrong.
So, they're acquiring terminals using the same methods they are using to sell their oil.
Azerbaijan and Geogia xd
@Booz2010😂😂😂
Be thankful that Russia doesn't fry terrorist satellites with the world's most powerful lasers. If Syria, 30% of whose territory is occupied by the United States, had such lasers, they would probably have used them long ago. Russians are very peace-loving.
central asia as usual
You mean how the US is buying Russian oil! 😂😂😂
As if the NSA isn't monitoring them 😆
You think they were forced to cooperate like AT&T back in the days of the cold war?
If so reporters may find documented court cases on that subject. I think Musk would consider Star Link his private property and is by heart a republican who doesn't want government setting foot on his property. Which may but also explain why russia has access to star link. Not only because republicans are quite cozy with russia, but due to the self image of a self made man who sells to anyone who wants to buy ... which may therefor be seen as breaking sanctions if not worse.
@@kinngrimm his business Space X is a USA governmant conrtractor and is star link currently going throught testing with the USA militray. The government can get all the access they want
@@kinngrimm Seems you watch too much mainstream. Republican and Democrats both love the government. You have to look at their actions to how much both love the government. Republican's will go on mainstream media and say they don't like federal government but in reality they love it. They're basically the same party with few ideological differences who are trying to get as much power as you can.
@@kinngrimm You think Elon Musk is a republican? Are you serious? Someone who supports universal basic income and a tax on carbon emissions? Stop eating out of the hand of media outlets and think for yourself.
100% they are
reminded me I read about the Korean war.. UN troops were surprised that Chinese were firing Tommy guns at them. i want to use the same analogy.. like a tommy gun, you dont need to be an American to use it.. turned out the US provided them during the Chinese Civil War to KMT... were all lost. same idea with the starlink
Unlike a a Tommy gun. Starlink uses active subscriptions. Meaning the Elon is allowing Russia to subscribe and use the system.
they already copied tommy guns in 1920s, way before korean wat
The right title should be: “Starlink faces difficulty disabling Russian use in Ukraine battlefield”. Can’t be more clear about the essence of this video, but instead WSJ chose to be blurry.
Funny that Elon had no problem disable Ukrainian starlinks when they started using them neer the sevastopol.
Clickabe titles are prio #1, very sad too see even from Journalistic channels like this, I want truth not clickability :/, watching the video does explain the misinformation though.
@@zperdek cause that's quite far from the frontline (60m+) - easy to detect
@@zperdek The “shut down”story was not accurate and it’s not hard to find the explanation from many follow-up reports.
Ukraine could host a database that contains records for each Starlink terminal they currently operate. Starlink could then cross reference each terminal they know to be operating in Ukraine with that database and disable those that do not have corresponding records in the database. There are some obvious downsides to this, such as needing to securely maintain these records and the need to keep track of every Starlink terminal (both civilian and military), but it's a start.
They could block any serial number not sold in Ukraine...
Lol, you have Russian assets within Ukraine and there is corruption there.
So, don’t be surprised if someone enters the data of the terminal sold to russia as well
@@urband10 Ukraine received a lot of Starlink terminals bought outside of Ukraine.
haha surely Russia never thought of this, slobber urgranny!
Terminal will be hacked and spoofed anyway no matter what you do on the software things. Unless Starlink takes into account the security for hardware hacking up to very decent level in the first place, Russians will break through the system eventually and consistently.
Maybe they watch HBO
If the Kremlin says"we don't use it". Be sure they do.
100% everything they say is usually the exact opposite. LOL
nike, apple etc exit from russia 2 years ago but You can still buy it in shop 🤣
blackmarket exist for a reason
Same goes with the Whitehouse
IS THAT WHY UKRAINE STILL THINKS THIER WINNING?
😅😂😅😂😂😅
Just like the traitors in office here.
So this is a complete non story meant to hurt Musk
To be fair, i think it was done pretty well. It probably could have been researched more, as some small (non significant) details were left out, but, it got the point across in a neutral way.
@@sebastianorye2702 Musk works hand in glove with the military through SpaceX, the chance they would let him help Russia is 0%. Anybody with a brain could come to that conclusion.
@@sebastianorye2702 Oh and SpaceX could use starlink to track Russian positions if they were using. Do you see how dumb this story is now?
Not really? Just because you get triggered at titles that you automatically assume are negative does not mean that is reality. The title of the video is 100% accurate, it in no way said it was Elon Musk's fault or said that he did anything wrong. It is entirely on you for assuming as such, and really points to your personality.
@@truedps8 try something other than an ad hominem attack to make your point, and read my other comments on this thread before you respond
elon should start to issue camo pattern dishes obviously
Spray paint or camo net 3:19
Seems like a StarLink terminal would be a good indicator of a command and control element of the Russian armed forces. Not sure it I’d want a calling card in the patio or balcony of the structure I’m using.
Those who didn't learn to put their radiowave emitters/receiver on some distance from their actual location are not alive after 2 years of war. That goes for both sides. Not only starlinks, but other antennas as well
Or not. We Will see soon
It's a small device.
Musk would only try to protect Russia.
Nah farm just like the Ukrainian they would just give starlink terminals for mobile recon units and drone squads while HQ elements will use the big boy military grade stuffs
Starlink isn't a buy the hardware get the service for free setup, they know exactly what receivers are on what accounts.
The allow list section is so stupid. You can only connect to Starlink through their terminals. All terminals are manufactured by Starlink and are sold by them or authorized sellers, therefore all terminals are allowed by default. This does not help to determine whether a terminal is transferred to an unauthorized party.
There is nothing stupid about this. You just don’t understand it. Starlink supports the Ukrainian Military. They can easily get a list of all the device id‘s which the Ukrainians own. All other devices near the front line will be disabled.
@@Rollmops94
🤦🏽♀️
@@Rollmops94there is no list. commerical and private entities have been donating starlink to ukrainian soldiers since the beginning. there are thousands of units not registered with the ukrainian army. there is no ukrainian army starlink terminal database.
@@bardgold4553
First of all: How do you know? I am 99 percent certain you don’t know how the Ukrainian military handled these things. Then there is communication. Even if such a list does not exist it is actually pretty easy to create such a list. The Ukrainians could look for an id in their devices and report it back. Devices could have their id read automatically when communicating over a secure Ukrainian channel/server. Why talk so much when you clearly don’t have any knowledge to back anything up? Are you that desperate?
''Russia says'' That one never gets old.
I'm behind the time's with technology these reports are enlightening thanks
So what? SpaceX is a company just like any companies in the world who likes making profits.
Ukraine would literally have no communication without Elon Musks Starlink service. The Ukraine government should be a little more thankful for the help and support they received. They seem to be irritating the Polish farmers as well.
hello ruzzian bot.🎉
@@EnjoyMoto Hello Zelenskys co-sniffer. 😶🌫
he said the truth... Ukraine are not greatful@@EnjoyMoto
@@EnjoyMotoi guess you are a russian bot, which tries to deny any problem.
@@tubeyou8728 Russians are using Ukrainian GSM network. What did Ukraine to this issue? Nobody wants to shoot in own leg? Better spit on Elon Musk?
I wonder how easy it would be for SpaceX to triangulate the coordinates of the terminals, basically like GPS in reverse
They already have to pinpoint the terminals in order to steer the data beam to them. It’s not a problem of determining where terminals are but determining who they belong to. SpaceX would have to somehow keep track of the dynamic front line across thousands of km in real time.
@@Rudmin No they dont. If someone access to starlink, they know exact location of it. Everyone knows where borders are, so its not hard to determine what belongs to soviets and who belongs to west.
They knew roughly where the borders were before 2022. Now it’s a constantly changing frontline and nobody knows exactly where the contact line is at all times.
@@markoliimatainen2565 the borders are constantly changing in a battle field
why would you want Russia to stop using Starlink? If they paid for it, let them have it, it's only fair.
Would you trust critical traffic to a system from a company that's based in an adversarial country? I wouldn't. I'd assume the NSA is reading every message.
You mean kgb is readin every message from comrade musk`s commie link.
When the guy who's running it is willing do anything for a dollar there's a good chance
This war is going create a lot of controversy. I just have a bad feeling that this war is going to turn into a lot bigger war that we don’t want to happen.
Kaabooommmm
Yeah, it's why we need to nip it together he bud now. Appeasing tyrants has shown time and time again to not work.
So the West should stop provocative behavior
@@VISCABARCAist ok russian bot
@@luderx I’m not even Russian
This is just the reality
This issue is so much more complex than this stupid WSJ video implies. They would have you believe that the Russians simply go to their local illegal electronics store, pick up a Starlink terminal, carry it the front and use it to wage war on Ukraine. The Starlink networks knows when any online terminal is in view of any satellite and where it is located exactly. It is easy to geo-fence any terminal, given that they allowed it to connect in the first place. Now ask yourself what do you want to do with that knowledge. You can either deny it access, or permit it access. If you permit it access, you can track it's location, collect intelligence on it, etc. If you choose to deny it access, you may be doing more harm than good. Personally, firing up a Starlink terminal without understanding that big brother knows exactly what you are doing and where you are sounds like a Wily Coyote move to me. So for the WSJ to imply that this situation is bad without any analysis, is just irresponsible.
🤦🏽♀️
Have you heard of encryption?
Maybe a few of Elon's Starlink satellites should be taken "offline".
for all the cybersecurity professionals out there who didn’t catch that “allowlist” is just a more inclusive term for “whitelist”.
An analogous term for a “blacklist” would be “blocklist”
How the heck is starlink approved for use in Iran?!
it's not. but starlink has global coverage. iranians can just get them from other countries
It is approved for use over Iran, not in Iran.
You're coming from the wrong direction, its not the Iranian Governemnt approving it. It's the U.S. allowing its operation to help foment unrest. Surely you don't think something as expensive as launching 1000's of satellites into space is getting paid for by civilian users right? lol
Becuse it not your father property
@@dutchymon What does that mean... "over Iran" ???
This awkward situation for starlink, if they were to admit they could produce an acurate map of where each terminal was, you could have a country that banned them demanding the map so they could hunt down people using them to get the uncensored (rather than government version) of the internet
Yeah, but Starlink is incorporated in America, and their payments are handled in American jurisdiction. Starlink has zero legal obligation to fulfill such requests, since their service is technically illegal in such regimes already
@@prfwrx2497 I think these regimes are devious and nasty enough to make their presence felt irrespective of legality:-(
@@backacheache
What he is saying is that Elon Musk does not have to give any information to anyone. Also the video already said that Starlink knows the devices locations. It is also obvious that it can know, because each Satellite obviously knows what ground devices it is connected to. The rest is just a triangulation algorithm and then you know the location.
man, there isn't USA, there is almost no censorship, you can watch both sides.
WSJ never misses an opportunity to take a jab at Elon. I’ve seen WSJ ads on Facebook to promoted articles they’ve put out specifically for hit pieces against Elon.
Gets views
After all the billions 🧼 thought corrupt Ukraine 🇺🇦
Now the internet 🛜 is the major advantage.
Take care of the southern border
Trump 2024
Cheers from west Africa
🦅
Who cares if Russia uses it ??? Shut up Ukraine
Member iphone had jailbreak….starlink jailbreak ?
🛰🇺🇦 Fascinating insight from WSJ on Ukraine's claim that Russia is using Starlink. Elon Musk's satellites continue to shape geopolitics, highlighting the intersection of technology and global affairs. 🚀🌐
Simple, stop allowing Starlink to be used in Ukraine.
Incredible tech, Starlink's role is crucial in Ukraine 🌐
Nothing incredible about it. It was invented in 1980s. It's never caught on because it's slow. It's primarily used in emergencies where regular infrastructure is destroyed and by the military. No one else bothered to send as many satellites in space because they satellites don't have long lifespan and it's a massive money sink hole. StarLink operates at a large loss. Once satellites need repairs, I'm sure they'll abandon it. Since replacing will cost like 30+ billion and that is on the low end. Only the US military has the resources to maintain so many satellites hence why you get free GPS--thanks to the government. Business wise it's not a smart idea. StarLink is not even the first. There are other smaller companies who've been doing this for years but they don't cover as large of an area as StarLink because it's a waste of money.
@@manchuratt8900 No, Starlink is becoming a geyser of cash. It has been cashflow positive since 2022. Revenue is expected to be $10bn in 2024. An IPO is planned for the next two or three years. You're spouting pure misinformation. No, wait: _pure disinformation._
@@manchuratt8900I think I read the satellites only last five years and they just deorbit them. You're right, it's very expensive to maintain this kind of infrastructure.
@@manchuratt8900that's not true my friend. Low orbit satellites are new. Speeds circa 200 Mbps are new.
Even using user authentication, furthermore with photo ID, they still can fake it, either forgery or borrowing it. Devices allow list, they still can stole it or use third party vendors. Basically Starlink still on hot fire whatever they do.
Who support Ukraine ✅✅
no one
@@BlackyHawk95 due to what reason?
@@Tehseenkhanbettani why would anyone support a corrupt country like that
@@Tehseenkhanbettani they are n&zis
Now blame Elon Musk for Russia's victory, WSJ propaganda
If it wasn't for Elon Musk there would be no Ukraine. Let that sink in.
That would make Starlink participant in the war and a legitimate target, probably explains the latest news related to Russia and weapons in Space
Things keep getting more interesting, 2024 might be most interesting year yet.
Its all just bs propaganda Russia have been able to shoot down satellites since 2021 whit systems like s500, this super super nuke space wepon is just media trying to spread fear for the agenda
Just stop allowing starlink in Ukraine. Problem solved.
You are mistaken, this is not Starlink. This is TSARLINK. Designed by Ivan Maskovsky.
However, starlink for maritime is said to be working in some parts of Russia.
what
Now that's free WiFi
luckily those terminals can't be hack'd.
right?
right?
Exactly... Nothing can be hacked anymore. Nothing.
@JeanLucLikeTheCaptainPol-eb4gq Gee Thanks Captain Obvious... Do you think they will use drones in more wars too
@JeanLucPolitics brain-dead. You used all that brain and still didn't realise it was sarcasm. Amazing
@@Joy-e5m4v lol!
Another issue not identified in this article is how does Starlink know if a terminal has been supplied by the Ukranians but subsequently captured by the Russians. A very tricky situation that could only really be sorted by actively denying both sides access to the network.
Everyone needs to watch the tucker carlson and putin interview!!!!
So why would Ukraine want to cry foul when they have been using starlink themselves
seems like WSJ has an axe to grind with Elon Musk
DirectTV had this tech decades ago
at much much lower speed and higher latencys
Great Content. ❤
When he said "Separation confirmed" i felt that :(
I see where this is useful, but I still hate it...I go camping often and I can already see the satellites they launched blinking across the night sky
It's a shame how this channel praises Ukraine for using starlink and then condemns Russia for using it
Had two of them, they just failed to work.
This like Tony stark stuff. Elon break out to suit 😂
allowlist is a good idea
It’s an opportunity for US defense to study Russian tactics. Let it fly .. good way to find Russian patterns.
Russian military intelligence GRU: omg, they are like todlers... they bite everything.... I can't f...ng belive it
I Stand with Ukraine, and hope the whole world come to peace, regardless our differences. ❤
you can't pick a side and then say you want peace. If you want peace, sides are irrelevant.
@@hiufgterde it’s relevant because Ukraine didn’t start the war
@@Jad-TV Didn't they? They ripped apart the peace treaty, so they made a deliberate decision to go to war with Russia instead of becoming a neutral country with all its territory intact. How exactly was that in the best interest of the people and country of Ukraine? Reality is much more complicated than the story they like to tell you on CNN over and over again. Every government needs to sell their war to its people somehow but this war was a clear choice from the west. It could have easily been prevented but war was the goal. Now they got their wish and Ukraine is being destroyed. All sides are just as guilty to the situation we see today. There is no good vs bad, it's only bad vs bad.
@@hiufgterdeI sure can pick a side. Especially if one side doesn't seem to care about human rights, or war crimes.
@@Jad-TV Are you sure Ukraine didn't start the war. Did your knowledge of Ukraine history start from 2022?
Step 1 sell to both sides (claim you dont)
step 2: profit???
Kihnzal is coming ...
The allow list is a no-brainer, but in the wrong hands with someone with knowledge can easily deny access to the ones that need it the most
Good for them 👍. Free for all. Not just beggars
I looked on the map for "Rasha" but no country like that exists
Why complain, Ukraine is using the starlink in the war, what right does Ukraine have to complain to russia?
You cant shut down terminals WHY? Seems like is not Starlink?
TLDW; Starlink should setup a Nyet list.
I don't know if you people realize but the US is not at war with Russia. This complicates matters somewhat...
Well, all he need to do is feed the positions to allies.
As starlink works, he can pinpoint perfect location ef every user in occupied territories !
Why don't they want Russia to have internet access? Because they won't pay the bill?
😂 in Russia we don't know what is internet
Indian Govt should Ban or limit Star link internet service in India 🇮🇳
*But* ... Starlink _is_ working in the occupied territories *but* .... not in Crimea when Ukraine asks for it.
Funny how people in the comment who don't know anything about how Starlink work acting like they know more than Elon Musk. 🤣🤣
Who's monitoring and manipulating Star link? Is thier an independent body oversight Starlink with inference?
Suggestion, why don't starlink simply provide Ukrainian intelligence with location of all active terminals and let Ukraine sort it out?
Ukraine needs starlink for civilian use as well. And if Ukraine did have their own communication equipment, they wouldn’t use starlink.
It's not part of their contract and besides why would Elon Musk do that if Russia would just destroy their satellites that the US warned of.
Maybe they're already doing that but they wouldn't tell the public
Whats funny is you cant because its a military program.
Thumbs down on star link satelite...
The guts of Ukraine accused Elon After what he all did to them is disgusting!
keyword was OFICIALLY
5,400 satellites!!
Just share the (appr.) Locations of all starlink terminals within the Ukrainian borders to the Ukrainian military and the Russians wont be using them anymore
Ukraine wouldn't be using them anymore either, you know that would be leaked
Great idea and Ukraine will do better than it is already doing!
They already do block some regions. I recall Elon said they blocked some geo locations where Ukrainian's were using it for drones. StarLink already operates a big loss, I guess they don't want to lose more customers.
@@pcebroPretty hard to do any worse when they are sending senior citizens to the front lines and are losing ground every day but ok
@@pyromcrThose old folks are racking up a lot of kills.
"high speed"
51 yrs living in America I've learned not to listen to the officials.... their never truthful
That would be like tank and weapons manufacturing being responsible for reclaiming them after they have been stolen. There's nothing they can do about it
This is not correct since a tank or weapon can't be remotely deactivated, nor geofenced either, Starlink can.
SpaceX knows when Starlink is being used by Russians, they just don't care.
I thought he denied sale to Russia?
2:20 Starlink operates in Iran? Really?
Russia Possibility Started to Nuclear War Erupted
Why an American company and his owner are allowed to aid the enemy of America with impunity???!!!!
Oh, you couldn’t tell that he was on Team Russia ?
MAYBE UKRAINE SHOULD FOCUS ON THEIR FAILURES IN TACTICS AND STRATEGY
You should laser focus on a Ukraine and Russia conflict as it doesn't affect you in any way
But don't you dare focus on what your own government do .. politicians, media, presidents, money spending, secret services and agencies, privacy, prices and so on that touches each one of you directly.
It makes sense right ? just let the media tell you what to think and social media what to buy, earn, spend, die.. but first obey
Does elmo blocks russians starlinks, or he blocks only one that Ukraine uses?
Elon Moscow
Elon musk is giving starlink to both sides.
Iridium officially operates in Russia and even has a ground station, right?
In the beginning of this mess Didn't elon support Ukraine with starlink and now supports Russia ? If this is correct than maybe He pretended to help Ukraine , while helping Russia ? Please let me know if im incorrect because I just want to know the truth.
Putin outsmarted ur pops elon musk 😂
I'm a engineer my self and can't understand why Elon is not disabling the dishes for Russian millitary. There are solutions for this.
If you're an engineer, then you know about the triangle and your comment was idiotic.
@@springbloom5940 You can attach metadata to each pocket of data, it will slow just a bit the internet but you can control who can use it.
Strike 1
Ukrainians is blessed to have America 🇺🇸. From military supply to paying for their internet.
Yes! America is great at convincing others to sacrifice themself for a Big Mac Combo. And better still use Chinese money to pay for it.
Yes bankrupt average working Americans and fill the pockets of Lockhead Martin....Great idea
You have to tell Zelensky to sue for peace. Even if america was to somehow give Ukraine more money/weapons there aren’t enough people to fight.
Then approve the bills already!!!
Ukraine is on the back foot against them because setback of supply from U.S promises.
SO ITS ONLY RIGHT FOR UKRAINE TO USE IT AND NOT RUSSIA?
Russians like quick WiFi too 😂
everybody can buy starlink if they want to buy.