A clearer audio copy of this video can be listened to on Sri Ramana Teachings podcast (ramanahou.podbean.com) or downloaded from ramanahou.podbean.com/e/the-blind-intelligence-of-ai-cannot-help-us-to-see-what-is-real and a more compressed audio copy in Opus format (which can be listened on the VLC media player and some other apps) can be downloaded from mediafire.com/file/rybkpcjkpjcpkow
@@FlexPot Namaskaram. No, unfortunately it is not at all an accurate translation, and in many verses he follows the same misinterpretations that are found in several early translations (but in most cases not in Lakshmana Sarma’s translation, which unlike in other early translations is almost free of serious misinterpretations). Namo Ramanaya 🙏🙏🙏
Sri Arunachala Aksharamanamalai sung by Sri Sadhu Om, with English translation by Michael James, can be watched here: vimeo.com/ramanahou/am000 . For advertisement-free videos on teachings and songs related to Bhagavan Ramana, please visit vimeo.com/ramanahou and click 'showcases' on the bottom left. Each original work of Bhagavan Ramana has its own showcase with explanations of Michael James.
Let us not waste. The time. Time is very precious latest give each and every moment in investigating the IAM that is the most “core teaching you have given in this lecture is very helpful but when would I be able to turn my mind hundred person into my being without the grace of Bhagvan I don’t think I would be able
Social media is Vishaya vasana so this vasana shd be shut,go to the spiritual heart n shut the ego by taking it in by luring it .Vishaya vasana keep popping it has to go back to the self.Doing charity is good do it but say that God is the beneficiary of the fruit so it will not allow ego to rise.
In the Gita Bhagwan Krishna says never consider yourself to be the cause of ur activities n do not be inactive,so what i said in the comment was to consider God as the doer, when u do that ur sada karmas also do not multiply for which u hv to take birth again. N by the way Bhagwan is helping me with atma vichara .Thankyou for ur advice n i bow to the atma 🙏 inside u.
@shilpamurdeshwar5788 There are no two atmas. Be attentive to what is always. Eveyone else is a projection of the one ego. The other person is not real. Focus on what is real, and everything will cease. However, it never existed in the first place, only seemingly there.
@shilpamurdeshwar5788 who is alive? What do you mean the other person is alive? They are not other than you. See if the person you take yourself to be is actually alive and existing.
Doesn't Bhagavan say that the universe is real if seen as Brahman, as opposed to saying that Brahman is real and the universe unreal? Or, is this considered a lower teaching, meant for those who can't take the ultimate? Or is the world totally unreal, illusory?
@johnmcdonald260 Slow down. I take quote from Osbourne's book: Bhagavan speaking--Shankara has been criticised for his philosophy of Maya (illusion) without understanding his meaning. He made three statements: that Brahman is real, that the universe is unreal, and that Brahman is the Universe. He did not stop with the second. The third statement explains the first two; it signifies 1 T., 189. 2 D. D., p. 238. 5 that when the Universe is perceived apart from Brahman, that perception is false and illusory. What it amounts to is that phenomena are real when experienced as the Self and illusory when seen apart from the Self. This having been said, it is key that there is a third statement, not simply Brahman real and world unreal. I am trying to get at this point. Is the world real, with all its change and multiplicity, if Brahman is seen to underlie it all, hence saving phenomena? I think Ramana says elsewhere that the world is like a shadow in a flood of light, putting it in perspective. But, it stops short of full denial, it seems; again, recall that Ramana did not stop at the first two assertions of Shankara, insisting on the third. It is a huge difference.
@johnmcdonald260, when you say that ego is not Brahman one should simultaneously note that there are not two kinds of awareness because there is only Brahman. Therefore ego is in essence/substance - i.e. bereft of its adjuncts - but Brahman. Seeing Brahman is becoming/being Brahman.
A clearer audio copy of this video can be listened to on Sri Ramana Teachings podcast (ramanahou.podbean.com) or downloaded from ramanahou.podbean.com/e/the-blind-intelligence-of-ai-cannot-help-us-to-see-what-is-real and a more compressed audio copy in Opus format (which can be listened on the VLC media player and some other apps) can be downloaded from mediafire.com/file/rybkpcjkpjcpkow
Hi Michael, I wanted to ask if the Richard Clarke version on Ulladu Narpadu verses are accurate?
@@FlexPot Namaskaram. No, unfortunately it is not at all an accurate translation, and in many verses he follows the same misinterpretations that are found in several early translations (but in most cases not in Lakshmana Sarma’s translation, which unlike in other early translations is almost free of serious misinterpretations).
Namo Ramanaya
🙏🙏🙏
Thank you guys for your replies. A bit gutted because I thought it was accurate. Appreciate your help on clearing that up 🙏🏻
Having you.. is a blessing from Bhagavan🙏
Om Namo Bhagavate Shri Arunachala Ramanay 🙏
🙏
Thank You Michael James!!!
Thank you for your work Micheal
Such clear and concise knowledge. Thanks you Michael ❤
Thank You!🙏
Michael 🙏🕉️ namo ramanaya
Wonderful.❤ many thanks. ❤
💖 💐 🙏 🕉
Sri Arunachala Aksharamanamalai sung by Sri Sadhu Om, with English translation by Michael James, can be watched here: vimeo.com/ramanahou/am000 . For advertisement-free videos on teachings and songs related to Bhagavan Ramana, please visit vimeo.com/ramanahou and click 'showcases' on the bottom left. Each original work of Bhagavan Ramana has its own showcase with explanations of Michael James.
❤❤❤
❤
🙏🕉️
Let us not waste. The time. Time is very precious latest give each and every moment in investigating the IAM that is the most “core teaching you have given in this lecture is very helpful but when would I be able to turn my mind hundred person into my being without the grace of Bhagvan I don’t think I would be able
🙏🙏🌺 Still, it seems without grace of Bhagvan, there would not be possible the holding on I
I think AI is basically like the mind.
Social media is Vishaya vasana so this vasana shd be shut,go to the spiritual heart n shut the ego by taking it in by luring it .Vishaya vasana keep popping it has to go back to the self.Doing charity is good do it but say that God is the beneficiary of the fruit so it will not allow ego to rise.
In the Gita Bhagwan Krishna says never consider yourself to be the cause of ur activities n do not be inactive,so what i said in the comment was to consider God as the doer, when u do that ur sada karmas also do not multiply for which u hv to take birth again. N by the way Bhagwan is helping me with atma vichara .Thankyou for ur advice n i bow to the atma 🙏 inside u.
@shilpamurdeshwar5788 There are no two atmas. Be attentive to what is always. Eveyone else is a projection of the one ego. The other person is not real. Focus on what is real, and everything will cease. However, it never existed in the first place, only seemingly there.
@@xhesitase9729 hahaha forget it u wont understand.So without the atma how is the person alive.,😂
@shilpamurdeshwar5788 who is alive? What do you mean the other person is alive? They are not other than you. See if the person you take yourself to be is actually alive and existing.
@@shilpamurdeshwar5788no one understands. If we understood, we weren't be here taking right now, now would we?
Doesn't Bhagavan say that the universe is real if seen as Brahman, as opposed to saying that Brahman is real and the universe unreal? Or, is this considered a lower teaching, meant for those who can't take the ultimate? Or is the world totally unreal, illusory?
@johnmcdonald260 Slow down. I take quote from Osbourne's book:
Bhagavan speaking--Shankara has been criticised for his philosophy of Maya
(illusion) without understanding his meaning. He made three
statements: that Brahman is real, that the universe is unreal,
and that Brahman is the Universe. He did not stop with the
second. The third statement explains the first two; it signifies
1 T., 189. 2 D. D., p. 238.
5
that when the Universe is perceived apart from Brahman, that
perception is false and illusory. What it amounts to is that
phenomena are real when experienced as the Self and illusory
when seen apart from the Self.
This having been said, it is key that there is a third statement, not simply Brahman real and world unreal. I am trying to get at this point. Is the world real, with all its change and multiplicity, if Brahman is seen to underlie it all, hence saving phenomena? I think Ramana says elsewhere that the world is like a shadow in a flood of light, putting it in perspective. But, it stops short of full denial, it seems; again, recall that Ramana did not stop at the first two assertions of Shankara, insisting on the third. It is a huge difference.
@johnmcdonald260, when you say that ego is not Brahman one should simultaneously note that there are not two kinds of awareness because there is only Brahman. Therefore ego is in essence/substance - i.e. bereft of its adjuncts - but Brahman. Seeing Brahman is becoming/being Brahman.
Yes - and, incidentally, I've heard Nisargadatta say the same..
🙏🙏🙏
❤