No excuse why this can't happen as there are 3 different studios working in rotation. That gives each of them 3 whole years to make their game. What has ruined it is they are focusing on BS microtransactions and skins instead of making a solid game. People don't care, they will still spend their money and say "just a beta". Then the company won't fix anything from beta and people will say "it's only been out 2 months". See the pattern? Before we know it, the new COD is coming out and the old COD never got fixed. But people are so short minded they forget this and just buy the next one. Dummies.
Fans back in 2011 were complaining about MW3 being like a MW2 expansion disguised as a new game. Who would have thought that we would be here again today, making the same conclusion about their respective reboots? I don't know whether to call it irony or a genius attempt at fan service, for those who stop to think about it.
The only differences between those pair of games are: >MW2 2009 was a successful and well received game that just needed some fixes >MW3 2011 actually brought new cards to the table not only fixing the previous game but expanding it and improving it in every single way: -A more grounded campaign connected to COD4 -A expanded and better Spec Ops with extra modes like Survival -All original maps at launch -Introduced Scorestreaks and Specialists streaks with Killstreaks also being available, each one with their own unique streaks -Introduced weapon levels to progress instead of challenges -etc And because all of these are differences, this means, MWII & and MWIII are much more worthless than MW2 and MW3.
My main issue with the graphics downgrade since mw19 is anything from the end of the gun onwards. I think anything on the operator and animations and weapons all look fantastic in all three games, but there was just this vibe and ambience on mw19 multiplayer in the settings and lighting that just felt so real and quality. I was so impressed by that game. You’d think the following two games would have improved and improved but they have got worse both in terms of the graphics quality and for me the new mw3 gameplay has turned to complete arcade shooter that I probably won’t buy it.
I believe that this was caused by the removal of Ray Tracing from the game in order to make their games more accessible. RT is still a resource intensive process and it obviously reduces the quality of shadows, particle lighting, reflections which contribute to the "vibe". I am surprised that they decided to keep RT out of this MW3 game. I personally would've loved that little extra for those who can run RT.
@@notayetti555 they could atleast add it in the campaign I don't mind that being realistic but none at all is wild the old gen versions hold it back as well
Probably because MWII added a lot more saturation which makes things looks more like cheap plastic. Since a lot of people where crying that MW2019 looks to grey and depressing.
@@Aviciiz yeah mw2 was definitely more colourful. All the buildings look very basic and square too. It’s just sharp edges and blocks everywhere. Nothing looks organic.
People would still complain because the cod community is extremely divided. Some want realism, some want arcade. Others want new gameplay and others want classic nostalgic cod. Doesn’t matter how many years of development they have it’s impossible to cater to all sides of this community.
Because virtually nobody wanted realism. When they slowed everything down there was nothing except negative backlash. I myself really despised how they made it ten times more "casual friendly" even though I'm a casual myself
Yes but that explains why every update ruins the game's performance. I still remember going at 110 fps on Al mazrah at the very start of the game and now I barely reach 80 fps
its has to do also with the graphics drivers. I had this problem also and im using older graphics nvidia drivers to get the max out of my card @@aramean6502
@ocurrent8729 ahh the realism and attention to detail was on release, same as 2019. It's the BS live service aspects and updates that ruin the games performance, 2019 became such a joke that textures and floating objects could be seen in the sky on the Hill map on PS5 merely 2 years after release!
@DESTINYMASTER-zh4zf Here’s some tips if you want it to look like MW2. (Keep in mind, Beta graphics are probably on low-mid graphical settings, so launch or post launch will look better) •Lower down brightness until what suits you •Tweak your TV settings for color like saturation (not too much), gamma coloration to lighten up dark areas. •Balance out warm and light colors (preferably warm a tiny bit more) •Tweak your sharpness, make sure it’s not too sharp or blurry •Finally, turn off motion blur and film grain to make it look nice. Your TV/Monitor might have more settings that you can tweak with, so it’s down to personal preference
Blame the crybaby pros for that. All the complaining those dumbasses did bout recoil and visual recoil, now all guns feel like airsoft guns in mw3. They also lowered gun sounds in mw3 cuz “guns were earrape” in mw2
@@GT-qv1gl tf game you’re playing? No one even uses the m4 anymore. Even if they were, the m4 is one of the few gun in the game with the most versatility in terms of gun build so everyone having the same class setup doesn’t even make sense.
Why is it that every new game that comes out, the color pallets and saturation just end up looking more distopian with each new COD? That’s a problem if you ask me
@@victorley663 See that’s the on going pattern here isn’t it? When the new game comes out, a lot of the new things are seen as improvements, but then when the next game comes out, people talk crap about the things they just called “improvements”
@@victorley663 For example MWll: When the game came out I was hearing people say that they liked slide canceling and reload cancelling being taken out because it was more “realistic” and all that and then when MWlll says that they will reimplement those, everyone’s like “Oh yeah they’re right! MWll was crap for taking out slide and reload cancelling”
@@TYC7343 I guess in certain aspects of game. But I don’t think “realism” should ever be the top priority over a nice clear, and fun experience. That’s probably something MWll was not really grasping
Game feels good playing been on the beta for the past couple days, and big difference compared to MW2 the game actually feels somewhat playable, and not a one sided shit fest. But it’s just beta so let’s see how the final product turns out.
Except it's literally MW2 with a color change... The game has already been datamined and shown that it is using everything from MW2 with some slight changes. MW3 was supposed to be a DLC before they ended up changing into a full price game for a cash grab.
@@coryv5679 I'm pretty sure the multiplayer will replace/overlap MWII's multiplayer. No idea why people keep hyping this up to be a new game when it's just an expansion even if the multiplayer is separate from MWII
Idk the MWII & MWIII graphics why so downgrade from MW2019. MW2019 Graphics absolutely goat perfect realism visual with light performance pc specs, compared to the two games MWII&III the visuals look like plastic, which is very downgraded n I feel the performance has decreased slightly. I have tested graphic settings with 3070Ti n Ryzen 5600x with 32gb ram. in MW 2019 MP I could touch 240fps++ with Low quality / competitive set @1080p while I tried the same thing in MWII settings n I couldn't even touch that frame rate number anymore, I only got around 150fps++ in MWII. Idk what the developer has done. Maybe MWIII visuals would have been better n more fps if they had used the old graphics engine that MW2019 n more improvement for the new sequel.
They purposely tone down the graphics for multiplayer for “performance and clarity”. It’s stupid but true. Doesn’t change the fact that MW3 looks like a mobile game
MW2 looks drab and dreary by default. OP forgot to turn off their game filters in the MW2 comparison so it makes it look way more saturated than it should. Plus they did their comparison in the DRC map, which has a lot of bright buildings and a sunny skybox. A more accurate comparison would've been to use the Hatchery map in MW2 since it's got a similar tone and color palette. Otherwise this isn't really a fair comparison.
Color saturation looks more vibrant on 2, could just be that 3 is in beta. 2 sound is more realistic but I like the 3 sound better. It doesn’t blow my eardrums out. 😂
It's just less saturated. The game uses the same engine as Mw19, although perhaps Activision is too lazy to update its graphics engine in 4 years of use
No... its because is Ground War on The new Warzone map... But yeah its like missing still some quality effects such as darkness and shadows! Is just way too big or still in beta stages! So right now weapons are much perfectly completed so map itself is last...
cause its the beta, its like a 20 gig download so ofc you're not gonna be downloading high res textures and lighting. they cut everything that dosnt affect core gameplay being the graphics and details otherwise if you wanted all that itd be a 100 gig download. they make it shit house and cut all the unnecessary features for the beta so the size is smaller and thus more people can download and play
indoor sounds working correctly again in MWIII thank god. MWII's indoor audio profile was terrible, it was just the outdoor sounds with "indoor" reverb played over top
@@elFrankklin Realistic with slide cancel... yeah, that's a deal breaker for me, I loved the campaign but the multiplayer was full of either camping snipers or rushers with everything maxed out, "warzone 1" was good except for the slide cancel again literally the main gameplay was to do slide cancel because otherwise you were at a disadvantage 🤷🏻♂️
The game itself (mw2) was 120 GB and after months of updates it is 200 GB... It's the same with cod mobile. The game was only a few GBs but now it's 30, and they didn't add anything, simply with each update it's the GBs of the update plus the game's own GBs duplicated.
This proves at mw2 was amazing when it released they shouldn’t have released another cod this year in my opinion they should’ve made the game a whole lot funner
Mw3 is clearly undersaturated by a lot. Hope there’s an option to change it cuz I like colours in my game. Weird how for the arcade game they choose to give it a dull realistic look
Complaining about any COD game in the last 8 years has been no different than when Morgan Spurlock made that documentary about how unhealthy McDonald's was back at the beginning of the 2000s. just like how Americans didn't stop eating there and getting exponentially fatter than the rest of the world, the Luddites that keep coming back for more every year for COD will keep coming back no matter what you show them. It's a masochistic addiction for them.
Cod is not a realistic shooter game at all. It does have realistic graphics but the shooting part. Not so much. If you want to see realistic shooters try Arma 3, Hell Let Loose, or Squad to name a few.
ambos son brutales en detalles pero me gusto el detalle al disparar en en agua de mw3 muy bien logrado los caquillos flotan unos segundos y los disparos provocan burbujas al ser la bala disparada
For anyone watching this comparison, please keep in mind that he is comparing MW2 PC vs MW3 PS5. There are bound to be some changes since we all know that a PC will be able to handle higher graphics and other particle lighting and shadows. Wait until the PC open beta so you can obviously make a perfect comparison.
not sure how anyone can think that the current graphics in the playstation beta are indicative of the graphics we will see on pc and current gen consoles come release. it's quite obvious that the level of detail regarding textures and post processing has been downgraded to allow for a smaller beta download, not to mention that lack of adjustable settings that will be available on the pc version
its not even the graphics bro is comparing a pc version to a console version and on the pc version he has a nvidia filter on lmaoo u cant even compare it @@cyluk358
They both run the same engine as warzone. If it was an entirely different engine it would've had its own application for start up. That's why if you have warzone or mw2 you can play the beta on the same application because it's the same engine. @@Shrewbloom
@@Shrewbloomit's not a separate engine, the files themselves are labeled as being a DLC, like it was initially supposed to be, next time you should shut the hell up instead of trying to act smart.
As game dev the something the player feels wrong about the graphics is that TBH the real world is some what desaturated the devs think actually if they made eye accurate graphics it may take up system memory
I highly agree the slow time to kill combined with the throwback maps and the new movement and content makes it one of the best multiplayers coming from someone who last played bo3 and a bit of cold war only
Personally I’m okay with how it is. I’m not a graphics snob though. I’m just happy with the fact that I’m currently playing on maps I loved growing up. I would love a map rotation of all the most popular cod maps from the originals. I think a lot of people are missing the point that it’s also beta. I will also be curious to see how everything plays out with Microsoft buying the company out. Either way, as long as my 1080ti runs it I’m happy.
@@Rockyroad321 bro they're not selling it as an update, it's all just remastered maps 😂 not one original map, they're selling you the maps meant for Mw2 remastered mp as a new game bc they know you're dumb enough to believe them. Yeah you used to get 3 zombies maps for 30 bucks but you'd have to buy the base game too actually bringing the cost up to 90 dollars, plus you have the original maps plus the new ones. That's actually good value, not 70 dollars of contents that just worthy of a dlc, not a whole new game. Even if you count the fact they added new guns, news flash kid, they add guns for free to the current years title, they coulda just given this shit away for free 😂😂😂
@@Rockyroad321 if its 2013 and they announce that a brand new cod game is all remastered maps and no new original content aside from campaign and zombies then you'd call it a rip off, but since you've drank the Kool aid you act as if it's okay they held maps from releasing in Mw2 to give Mw3 a bigger map pool, and essentially remove the need for developing new maps until season 1 comes around.
I dont know, i know they downgraded the graphics but in a way I prefer it that way with the more bland colors and plastic looking, it got a old school cod vibe like black ops or mw3 original, like I feel more at home than with mw2 or mw19
MWIII is literally the DLC that they were going to charge $70 for, for MWII. Just the idea of a $70 DLC had horrible feedback from the majority of the community. So they literally got that same MWII DLC and rebranded it as MWIII…
I feel like it might be a little unfair to compare pc to a ps5 for graphics (Ik not much changed regardless between the games even if it was both on ps5 or pc)
Can we atleast appreciate that Sledgehammer delivered decent animations/sound instead of that trash Cold war game Treyarch put out. That being said, the graphics in MW3 still seem washed out and dull. Player visibility is going to be like MW2019 again
Treyarch was still using their old engine. Obviously it's not going to look anywhere near as good as 2019 let alone modern warfare iii. Treyarch should be using the new engine now because apparently Activision is forcing them to use it. Which makes sense. I don't want to learn how to use a completely different engine while making a new game, when I can just easily use my old engine that are already know how to use and try to make it behave the same way as the new engine.
@@Oznerol1234next year might probably one of the best, but in no way Cold War was even a top 5, it was the most rushed game and with the worst feel of the saga.
We just don’t need a new CoD every single year
Yes, we absolutely do. It's like it's own annual holiday (and at a much cheaper price than any other holiday's cost)
@@uppercutgrandma4425so you are down to pay for the same game every fucking year?
@@uppercutgrandma4425ur delusional
Yes we do there all made 4 years each. One other company's next year is treyarch
No excuse why this can't happen as there are 3 different studios working in rotation. That gives each of them 3 whole years to make their game. What has ruined it is they are focusing on BS microtransactions and skins instead of making a solid game. People don't care, they will still spend their money and say "just a beta". Then the company won't fix anything from beta and people will say "it's only been out 2 months". See the pattern? Before we know it, the new COD is coming out and the old COD never got fixed. But people are so short minded they forget this and just buy the next one. Dummies.
Fans back in 2011 were complaining about MW3 being like a MW2 expansion disguised as a new game. Who would have thought that we would be here again today, making the same conclusion about their respective reboots? I don't know whether to call it irony or a genius attempt at fan service, for those who stop to think about it.
time is a flat circle.
history repeats itself
Well, look at 2009 and 2022, there was an economic recession, an Avatar movie AND a MW2 game in both years
The only differences between those pair of games are:
>MW2 2009 was a successful and well received game that just needed some fixes
>MW3 2011 actually brought new cards to the table not only fixing the previous game but expanding it and improving it in every single way:
-A more grounded campaign connected to COD4
-A expanded and better Spec Ops with extra modes like Survival
-All original maps at launch
-Introduced Scorestreaks and Specialists streaks with Killstreaks also being available, each one with their own unique streaks
-Introduced weapon levels to progress instead of challenges
-etc
And because all of these are differences, this means, MWII & and MWIII are much more worthless than MW2 and MW3.
How much did u expect the game to improve in 12 months 🤡
3:15 look to the left 💀💀nice cut
😂
My main issue with the graphics downgrade since mw19 is anything from the end of the gun onwards. I think anything on the operator and animations and weapons all look fantastic in all three games, but there was just this vibe and ambience on mw19 multiplayer in the settings and lighting that just felt so real and quality. I was so impressed by that game. You’d think the following two games would have improved and improved but they have got worse both in terms of the graphics quality and for me the new mw3 gameplay has turned to complete arcade shooter that I probably won’t buy it.
I believe that this was caused by the removal of Ray Tracing from the game in order to make their games more accessible. RT is still a resource intensive process and it obviously reduces the quality of shadows, particle lighting, reflections which contribute to the "vibe".
I am surprised that they decided to keep RT out of this MW3 game. I personally would've loved that little extra for those who can run RT.
@@notayetti555 they could atleast add it in the campaign I don't mind that being realistic but none at all is wild the old gen versions hold it back as well
Probably because MWII added a lot more saturation which makes things looks more like cheap plastic. Since a lot of people where crying that MW2019 looks to grey and depressing.
@@Aviciiz yeah mw2 was definitely more colourful. All the buildings look very basic and square too. It’s just sharp edges and blocks everywhere. Nothing looks organic.
@Aviciiz is there any way to make it look more like 2019? Like can you turn down saturation to a certain level that matches it?
Something feels wrong in mw3
Maybe cause its bland
Or cuz the guy is playing on a tropical map on 2 and a bland map on 3 lmfao. Cant compare two entirely different lighting setups. @@dogpooper738real
This is a beta.maybe they will fix that
@@zamong2508yeah hopefully, it definitely feels like a sledgehammer game though so I wouldn’t keep my hopes up.
I personally like it better than 2, but maybe that's just cause it's a little new.
imagine if they took a few years off making a cod game to make one awesome call of duty game
Then we would end up with a game like the first MW remake.
They would probably still fuck it up and use 99% of a old game, which is a shame. COD is a scam
People would still complain because the cod community is extremely divided. Some want realism, some want arcade. Others want new gameplay and others want classic nostalgic cod. Doesn’t matter how many years of development they have it’s impossible to cater to all sides of this community.
You guys still buy and play them, or is there a better option?
@@majingamer6109 arma 3
It feels like they lowered the realism of everything, not just gun play. This shot feels like vanguard
Because virtually nobody wanted realism. When they slowed everything down there was nothing except negative backlash. I myself really despised how they made it ten times more "casual friendly" even though I'm a casual myself
Sledgehammer made it
they literally copied sounds, scopes and some animations from Vanguard to MW2. Without any changes. And want $70 in base, lol
@@x00dythis looks nothing like vanguard and wtf is $70 a lot of money I'm confused......
I disagree, playing as Nicki Minaj and pwning Homelander and Snoop Dogg is peak military realism
Whatever you think about MWII, it has great attention to detail and the guns feel great
Whatever you think about COD, you're buying the same shit every years
Facts!
@@svein5964if you play multiplayer I can see your point. Campaign and zombies are gonna be different.
and the shadowban problem is good too
Right 🎉🎉
The attention to detail in modern warfare 2 is so impressive
Yes but that explains why every update ruins the game's performance. I still remember going at 110 fps on Al mazrah at the very start of the game and now I barely reach 80 fps
@@ocurrent8729lol. yeah i reach 60 fps on a good day
@@ocurrent8729true. I had at the beginning of mw2 around 120+ fps competive settings on multiplayer and right now I’m barely getting 70-80
its has to do also with the graphics drivers. I had this problem also and im using older graphics nvidia drivers to get the max out of my card @@aramean6502
@ocurrent8729 ahh the realism and attention to detail was on release, same as 2019. It's the BS live service aspects and updates that ruin the games performance, 2019 became such a joke that textures and floating objects could be seen in the sky on the Hill map on PS5 merely 2 years after release!
Mw3 feels like cold war, mw2, mw2019 at the same time
And also Vanguard
@@CodyBLHRMore like Advanced Warfare
@@Mike-HF Well,both Vanguard and AW was developed by Sledgehammer games,so you're not wrong
Yeah they did added some stuff from mw2,mw,Cold war,and vanguard
They added sights from vanguard but that is all
Man everything after MW2019 went backwards
That’s true
yeah. They also reject synchronization of skins from MW 2019 to MW3
Then play 2019
@@DarkSulxzthe servers are getting shut down there’s no point + it’s like what 4 years old now who tf is playing it
@@thesuds4life Is it wrong to want to have the skins from mw 1 in mw3? According to you, it's good that the MW2 skins are in MW3, but not MW 1
The car suspensions werent in the mw2 beta either
Yeah most of the stuff missing im pretty sure will be added on release
Kinda feels like MW2 was the beta for MW3😂
@@CoolSmoovielmaoo exactly
he compare pc to playstation
@@CoolSmoovie It's a shame that MW3 is already going to be ruined from day one with clown skins and super heroes
In mw2 you have a color setting here, if you adjust the gamma in mw3 it will also be bright and colorful. (Translated into English)
Wdym gamma
@@fiend2societyGamma coloration, in a nutshell it basically just enhances the color in dark areas
@DESTINYMASTER-zh4zf Here’s some tips if you want it to look like MW2.
(Keep in mind, Beta graphics are probably on low-mid graphical settings, so launch or post launch will look better)
•Lower down brightness until what suits you
•Tweak your TV settings for color like saturation (not too much), gamma coloration to lighten up dark areas.
•Balance out warm and light colors (preferably warm a tiny bit more)
•Tweak your sharpness, make sure it’s not too sharp or blurry
•Finally, turn off motion blur and film grain to make it look nice.
Your TV/Monitor might have more settings that you can tweak with, so it’s down to personal preference
No because you’re settings transfer over from mw2 to mw3 so what ever you changed in mw2 it’s gonna show on mw3
No such feature for Xbox. Lighting is TRASH.
I miss the oompf and heaviness the AK47 had(sound, impacts) Getting kills in MW2019 was just so much more satisfying too.
couldnt agree more
@@Legendary_Rooky I mean the Kastov 7.62(103) sounded so pewnie and cant even take it seriously and i love that gun lol
Blame the crybaby pros for that. All the complaining those dumbasses did bout recoil and visual recoil, now all guns feel like airsoft guns in mw3.
They also lowered gun sounds in mw3 cuz “guns were earrape” in mw2
So satisfying going up against everyone just using M4s and MP5s with the same setups. Totally.
@@GT-qv1gl tf game you’re playing? No one even uses the m4 anymore. Even if they were, the m4 is one of the few gun in the game with the most versatility in terms of gun build so everyone having the same class setup doesn’t even make sense.
If there's a video for comparing mw1-2-3, i believe mw1(2019) is the best 😢
Why is it that every new game that comes out, the color pallets and saturation just end up looking more distopian with each new COD? That’s a problem if you ask me
Didn’t people complain about how grey and boring a lot of the MW19 maps were? MW2 looks more like a Black Ops game in how it’s colored, same with MW3
I mean, it is meant to be a game based on realism, even if we have a crap load of bundles lol.
@@victorley663 See that’s the on going pattern here isn’t it? When the new game comes out, a lot of the new things are seen as improvements, but then when the next game comes out, people talk crap about the things they just called “improvements”
@@victorley663 For example MWll: When the game came out I was hearing people say that they liked slide canceling and reload cancelling being taken out because it was more “realistic” and all that and then when MWlll says that they will reimplement those, everyone’s like “Oh yeah they’re right! MWll was crap for taking out slide and reload cancelling”
@@TYC7343 I guess in certain aspects of game. But I don’t think “realism” should ever be the top priority over a nice clear, and fun experience. That’s probably something MWll was not really grasping
Mw3 Looks like battlefield 2042
You're not the only one who noticed it
This game is looks like MW2 2022 too
It looks like blackout, especially with that goofy font
So I’m not the only one
are you blind bro
I played the beta and I feel the sledgehammer development. Gun sounds and movement feel like advanced warfare back then
when i watch the gunplay that's what i see also. the guns behave just like advanced warfare
seems a lot like vanguard to me
Game feels good playing been on the beta for the past couple days, and big difference compared to MW2 the game actually feels somewhat playable, and not a one sided shit fest. But it’s just beta so let’s see how the final product turns out.
@@mnnmnnnnnnnI thought it was just me when I played mw3 for the first time today. Felt like MWII 2022 with a bit of vanguard feel mixed in there
True winner: MW19
not even
@@DimonRecker yes even
@@DimonReckerbloody hell wdym? It was good than this Toy Story 1943 graphics and textures
@@SpecialOpsDeclassified Never said that this toy story game was any better, both games have something in common that plagued cod for good
With the art style, Mw2 definitely feels like a IW game, while Mw3 feels like a sledgehammer game!
Modern warfurry 3
Except it's literally MW2 with a color change... The game has already been datamined and shown that it is using everything from MW2 with some slight changes.
MW3 was supposed to be a DLC before they ended up changing into a full price game for a cash grab.
@@coryv5679 I'm pretty sure the multiplayer will replace/overlap MWII's multiplayer. No idea why people keep hyping this up to be a new game when it's just an expansion even if the multiplayer is separate from MWII
@@coryv5679 that is very true
Use me as an “I didn’t preorder MW3 button”
The lighting in mwiii makes the game look lifeless, also the textures look so blurry
Firearms in MWIII don't seem to be as powerful as the reloads in MW2019, MWII (they're not bad, but I don't really like them).
They are animations from vanguard I think
@@Uknown76but BOCW + Vanguard Quality :[
Mw2 lloking like an upgrade to mw3 wtf
Cod players when they realize a full game released last year looks better than a recent beta: 😲
Gameplay is king
@@evansmillan8868it isnt even a beta, the game comes out in a MONTH. this is practically a test for the full game
The 70 dollar DLC is a disgrace. But cod fanboys happily pay anything Activision hands them.🤡🐑🐑🐑🐑
@@evansmillan8868you when you realize that a cod beta is esentially the full game 😲😲😲
Idk the MWII & MWIII graphics why so downgrade from MW2019. MW2019 Graphics absolutely goat perfect realism visual with light performance pc specs, compared to the two games MWII&III the visuals look like plastic, which is very downgraded n I feel the performance has decreased slightly. I have tested graphic settings with 3070Ti n Ryzen 5600x with 32gb ram. in MW 2019 MP I could touch 240fps++ with Low quality / competitive set @1080p while I tried the same thing in MWII settings n I couldn't even touch that frame rate number anymore, I only got around 150fps++ in MWII. Idk what the developer has done. Maybe MWIII visuals would have been better n more fps if they had used the old graphics engine that MW2019 n more improvement for the new sequel.
The three games use the same graphics engine, the only thing that differentiates them is the color palette and saturation
@@evansmillan8868no
yapperton city right here
@@evansmillan8868mw 2 engine is different same with mw3 those two run on one engine
They purposely tone down the graphics for multiplayer for “performance and clarity”. It’s stupid but true.
Doesn’t change the fact that MW3 looks like a mobile game
The amount of time i spend watching comparison videos i probably could have had degree by now.
The feeling from mw3 reminds me of the OG mw3
omegalul stop smoking crack
That's what we don't want...
@@brendangamble1206 dellusional when he thinks that looks like mw3 and why i see your answer youtube succc
@@brendangamble1206haha why
MW2 looks drab and dreary by default. OP forgot to turn off their game filters in the MW2 comparison so it makes it look way more saturated than it should. Plus they did their comparison in the DRC map, which has a lot of bright buildings and a sunny skybox. A more accurate comparison would've been to use the Hatchery map in MW2 since it's got a similar tone and color palette. Otherwise this isn't really a fair comparison.
Favela in MW3 is supposed to be colorful and its somehow still washed out. MW2 colors were much better.
Agree was thinking the same also it’s still in beta
and hes using pc on mw2 and console on mw3 lmaoo this video is bad
How the fuck are you not going to mention the fact that he didn't disable motion blur in the MW3 footage?
Favela looks so fucking ugly in MW3. What they did is fucked up. Map looks like dog shit. on mw2 it was beautiful. What a joke.@@danjjjatest
Color saturation looks more vibrant on 2, could just be that 3 is in beta. 2 sound is more realistic but I like the 3 sound better. It doesn’t blow my eardrums out. 😂
Sorry, but for me it's a massive graphics DOWNgrade in MW III ... and I don't understand why, it's 2023 on Ps5!
man MW III it was beta
It a fucken beta
@@KiarAD27yeah the mwii beta also had missing details that showed up in the release
It's just less saturated. The game uses the same engine as Mw19, although perhaps Activision is too lazy to update its graphics engine in 4 years of use
@@evansmillan8868why would they change their graphics engine after just 4 years?
Mw2023 graphical fidelity is way above mw2022 but i think its running on low preset for beta
Pray that its on low preset for beta only
No... its because is Ground War on The new Warzone map...
But yeah its like missing still some quality effects such as darkness and shadows!
Is just way too big or still in beta stages! So right now weapons are much perfectly completed so map itself is last...
Jaja pero si es el mismo mw2? Solo que con colores más pálidos.
@@damianramirez9788 the shadows, ambient occlusion, etc etc is very bad or non existent, so maybe its on low preset
cause its the beta, its like a 20 gig download so ofc you're not gonna be downloading high res textures and lighting. they cut everything that dosnt affect core gameplay being the graphics and details otherwise if you wanted all that itd be a 100 gig download. they make it shit house and cut all the unnecessary features for the beta so the size is smaller and thus more people can download and play
@@fluxx3671 lets hope the final release fixes this otherwise its a shitshow
indoor sounds working correctly again in MWIII thank god. MWII's indoor audio profile was terrible, it was just the outdoor sounds with "indoor" reverb played over top
The more and more I watch these vids the more I realize this is probably a dlc for mw2 and I paid full price for it
Initial reaction to MW2 beta: Holy shyt these graphics are insane
Initial reaction to MW3 beta:eh everyone seems smaller
who would have thought a DLC would be 99% the same as the base game lol
MW3 : "I'm better than you!"
MW2 : "I'm you!"
3:15 the sniper be like 💀
From Mw 2019 to MW 2 was a downgrade in graphics , now there is further downgrade and even the gun sounds are bad
Gameplay always over graphics
Now people will first say that MW 3 is in beta then after release they will claim that next COD will be game changing , Same happened with MW2 .
So true everyone is so funding dumb blatantly paying for an update
mw3 had same vibe like MW2019, nice
Not really. Mw2019 was more realistic and had better movement and ambiance. The newest MW2 and MW3 are more like a black ops cold war, more arcade.
@@elFrankklin Realistic with slide cancel... yeah, that's a deal breaker for me, I loved the campaign but the multiplayer was full of either camping snipers or rushers with everything maxed out, "warzone 1" was good except for the slide cancel again literally the main gameplay was to do slide cancel because otherwise you were at a disadvantage 🤷🏻♂️
Its like comparing iphone 14 vs iphone 15
The game itself (mw2) was 120 GB and after months of updates it is 200 GB... It's the same with cod mobile. The game was only a few GBs but now it's 30, and they didn't add anything, simply with each update it's the GBs of the update plus the game's own GBs duplicated.
That’s how storage works my guy
Fun fact: Atleast 20GB out of those CODM storage is just ridiculously expensive skins
What a loud forward assist at 8:52. I hope I'm not the only one who chuckled
It just me Or Not, I think The animation Style Is more Like Bocw Than Mw2019.
200+ GB of hard drive space for a game that looks basically identical to the previous gen
So far mw2 is more polished, I don’t know why so many people disliked the game? 🤔
3:15 😂
mw3 is horrible its like going back, not forward. Even Mw2 beta was way better, the guns are way better in mw2.
nah
I said the same thing.
Bro is tripping
🤗Did you know, that if you buy this game, you are part of the problem that devs bring half assed products each year in full price🤗
Can we please get mw19 engine again please lol 😭
Yes I still play that game to this day
I’m pretty sure it’s the same game engine
2023 and we still don’t haven’t decent glass breakage in this game
This proves at mw2 was amazing when it released they shouldn’t have released another cod this year in my opinion they should’ve made the game a whole lot funner
MWIII needs MWII’s lighting with MW2019’s shadows
Mw3 is clearly undersaturated by a lot. Hope there’s an option to change it cuz I like colours in my game. Weird how for the arcade game they choose to give it a dull realistic look
Complaining about any COD game in the last 8 years has been no different than when Morgan Spurlock made that documentary about how unhealthy McDonald's was back at the beginning of the 2000s. just like how Americans didn't stop eating there and getting exponentially fatter than the rest of the world, the Luddites that keep coming back for more every year for COD will keep coming back no matter what you show them. It's a masochistic addiction for them.
The graphics downgrade is terrible. Going from ultra, utlra realistic MW2 to the washed out colors/textures of MW3 is suuuuper disappointing
I still don't know how people play with motion blur
MWIII is just a DLC and they are trying to sell it as a game. 70€ + BattlePass for the same game 4 years in a row.
So basically they used a lot of the same assets. Either way it's still one of the most realistic looking shooters.
Cod is not a realistic shooter game at all. It does have realistic graphics but the shooting part. Not so much. If you want to see realistic shooters try Arma 3, Hell Let Loose, or Squad to name a few.
@@alexandersandino1988squad >>
@@LtKatzeGP Agreed!
@@alexandersandino1988but their graphics and animations are immersive breaking
apart from HLL, tho
@@MrVoland44You mean the game itself is immersively terrible
The fact that they not using Unreal Engine 5 is ludacris at this point
ambos son brutales en detalles pero me gusto el detalle al disparar en en agua de mw3 muy bien logrado los caquillos flotan unos segundos y los disparos provocan burbujas al ser la bala disparada
durisimo osea lo que te gusta es algo que solo vas a ver 10 veces en 400 horas de juego.
@@LecheRev solo dije que me gusta las fisicas 😅pero no me gusto para nada el mw3
Pero si es igual que en MW2...
this new cod feels way more smoother to play for real ( on pc at least)
For anyone watching this comparison, please keep in mind that he is comparing MW2 PC vs MW3 PS5.
There are bound to be some changes since we all know that a PC will be able to handle higher graphics and other particle lighting and shadows. Wait until the PC open beta so you can obviously make a perfect comparison.
His pc doesn't look like it can handle it
And that MWIII is still in beta, and this stuff could get changed later
as long as everyone pays for the COD toll every year there will never be an incentive for better standards
not sure how anyone can think that the current graphics in the playstation beta are indicative of the graphics we will see on pc and current gen consoles come release. it's quite obvious that the level of detail regarding textures and post processing has been downgraded to allow for a smaller beta download, not to mention that lack of adjustable settings that will be available on the pc version
You’re so mentally abused by this franchise that you think the graphics will actually change in a month.
its not even the graphics bro is comparing a pc version to a console version and on the pc version he has a nvidia filter on lmaoo u cant even compare it @@cyluk358
That’s how it looked on my ps5 it wasn’t good
Lmao this is literally a finished game, yall were saying that last year
not sure how you can defend a dlc that downgrades the game
The fact that mw3 runs on mw2 app just proves they could’ve just overhauled mw2 with an update but instead they rather monetize that 😅
bro it’s a seperate engine tf you walking about just because it’s launched from mw2 doesn’t mean it’s inside of mw2
They both run the same engine as warzone. If it was an entirely different engine it would've had its own application for start up. That's why if you have warzone or mw2 you can play the beta on the same application because it's the same engine. @@Shrewbloom
@@Shrewbloomits the same engine, "upgraded"
@@Shrewbloomit’s literally the same thing but they added faster movement
@@Shrewbloomit's not a separate engine, the files themselves are labeled as being a DLC, like it was initially supposed to be, next time you should shut the hell up instead of trying to act smart.
3:15 - On the left behind the killfeed, "we'll be right back" meme sound
There is a gigantic visual downgrade from MW2019
It’s from the device, NOT ALL FROM THE GAME ITSELF.
@@-COD-GOLDGRINDERSo a PS4 is better than a PS5? Since MW2019 was natively made for PS4 and One.
The colour is more vibrant in mw2 the new mw3 has like a dry grey/brown tone to it
It's practically the same game, don't expect a graphic difference
@DESTINYMASTER-zh4zf It has a different color palette somewhat similar to Warzone 2019
Thumbnail goes crazy with the wrapped Honda accord
THE FULL PRICE DLC
As game dev the something the player feels wrong about the graphics is that TBH the real world is some what desaturated the devs think actually if they made eye accurate graphics it may take up system memory
Is it just me or are the graphics worse?
This DLC called "III" has a very noticeable motion blurring effect.
Best cod yet. Maybe even better than the old school cods
I highly agree the slow time to kill combined with the throwback maps and the new movement and content makes it one of the best multiplayers coming from someone who last played bo3 and a bit of cold war only
The fact that people need to make video to compare the difference between 2 videogame means everything
Activision works backwards, instead of improving new titles they look worse than its predecessor lmao
Its called beta for a reason and i highly doubt its using alot of graphic power
@@williamclark5310cod beta is basically a finished product, it's just a marketing stun
@@Villager_UNot a finished product.
@@Villager_U True, but some wait til the game is fully released before they adjust the graphics, turn on other features etc.
Bruh, they didn't even changed the logo
its... the same but less saturated?
yeah basically
The Modern Warfare franchise in a nutshell
Bro had time to play around in mw3. Meanwhile my lobbies too sweaty I can't do nothing
The shaders on the beta and full game for MW2 was so buggy, the MW3 ones look way better and much more optimized.
yep, looks like a DLC. Great video by the way. It's so cool this kind of content. =)
mw3 looks much less colourful and looks just worse
Copy/paste literally same engine same assets is the same freaking game this should be a DLC
from the point of view of realism, mv2 is better and mv3 is similar to battlefield 2042
The fax is mw3 is in beta moment, we remember when mw2 was in beta so much thing not work well
Personally I’m okay with how it is. I’m not a graphics snob though. I’m just happy with the fact that I’m currently playing on maps I loved growing up. I would love a map rotation of all the most popular cod maps from the originals. I think a lot of people are missing the point that it’s also beta. I will also be curious to see how everything plays out with Microsoft buying the company out. Either way, as long as my 1080ti runs it I’m happy.
So you're happy with paying 70 bucks for a bunch of maps you already paid 60 dollars for in 2010?
@@LecheRev nah, still want new maps. But I thoroughly enjoy the old maps as well 👍 would love to see terminal and a couple others back as well
@@LecheRevdon’t forget we use to pay 30 dollars for like 3 zombies maps. Compared to that the $70 update is worth it
@@Rockyroad321 bro they're not selling it as an update, it's all just remastered maps 😂 not one original map, they're selling you the maps meant for Mw2 remastered mp as a new game bc they know you're dumb enough to believe them. Yeah you used to get 3 zombies maps for 30 bucks but you'd have to buy the base game too actually bringing the cost up to 90 dollars, plus you have the original maps plus the new ones. That's actually good value, not 70 dollars of contents that just worthy of a dlc, not a whole new game. Even if you count the fact they added new guns, news flash kid, they add guns for free to the current years title, they coulda just given this shit away for free 😂😂😂
@@Rockyroad321 if its 2013 and they announce that a brand new cod game is all remastered maps and no new original content aside from campaign and zombies then you'd call it a rip off, but since you've drank the Kool aid you act as if it's okay they held maps from releasing in Mw2 to give Mw3 a bigger map pool, and essentially remove the need for developing new maps until season 1 comes around.
Mw3 feels good in the beta. It feel like old cod just with Better graphics
I dont know, i know they downgraded the graphics but in a way I prefer it that way with the more bland colors and plastic looking, it got a old school cod vibe like black ops or mw3 original, like I feel more at home than with mw2 or mw19
it's a beta, smart boy.
It’s Defo returning to earlier cods, I mean CoD4, MW2 2009, all had this darkened Color palette
MWIII is literally the DLC that they were going to charge $70 for, for MWII. Just the idea of a $70 DLC had horrible feedback from the majority of the community. So they literally got that same MWII DLC and rebranded it as MWIII…
The graphics in the Beta are a HUGE downgrade compared to MW2 and MW1. It's insane and honestly makes me want to refund the game.
ME TOO
I refunded. The graphics are a huge downgrade.
No one cares what u do with ur money bro
Thanks for putting the titles in the top left so we can tell which game is which.
I feel like it might be a little unfair to compare pc to a ps5 for graphics (Ik not much changed regardless between the games even if it was both on ps5 or pc)
They gotta get rid of the "grey" effect and then it'll look good. It's like game is some weird "overcast/cloudy" day compared to MW2
Can we atleast appreciate that Sledgehammer delivered decent animations/sound instead of that trash Cold war game Treyarch put out. That being said, the graphics in MW3 still seem washed out and dull. Player visibility is going to be like MW2019 again
Jajaja pero si es el mismo mw2 solo que te lo quieren vender como si fuera un juego nuevo y solo es un "dlc" 😂, qué pena da Activision jajaja
Treyarch can easily make the most amazing cod ever if they wanted to.....
Treyarch was still using their old engine. Obviously it's not going to look anywhere near as good as 2019 let alone modern warfare iii. Treyarch should be using the new engine now because apparently Activision is forcing them to use it.
Which makes sense. I don't want to learn how to use a completely different engine while making a new game, when I can just easily use my old engine that are already know how to use and try to make it behave the same way as the new engine.
@@henri4318and yet cold war is the best game between the mw2019 - MWII Era
3arc save us all next year
@@Oznerol1234next year might probably one of the best, but in no way Cold War was even a top 5, it was the most rushed game and with the worst feel of the saga.
"corporate needs you to find the difference between this picture and this picture"
mw3 has xbox 360 graphics hahaha
Bro ur tripping haha
I like how you join multiplayer matches for this rather than custom lobbies by yourself lol
MWIII is LITERALLY Copy & Paste....thats not worth 70€
No its Not, play it and you feel the difference
@@callgenesisthe slight differences still not worth 70 dollars
Then don’t buy it broke boy