I know the answer to the guy's question for the incentive structure.It's called a needs based statement machine and it's famously used in the game the sims. And it is a biologically inspired system that emulate the limbic system
I don't like this cult-like adoration of the new Deus ex machina. And why are people talking about "rights" for machines? It's totally absurd. How about we discuss instead how to prevent a situation where most humans turn against the machine because they feel exploited and manipulated (and are usually right about it, as data providing serfs), and then find out that the only way left to stop the machine is guerilla actions trying (and usually failing deadly) to bomb data centers, and disrupt their power supplies, which already compete with human needs for energy for food production.
`"It's impossible to predict the future... And on this uplifting note..." th-cam.com/video/sJE8qZmQWGU/w-d-xo.html Ilya states that it is impossible to know how ASI will reason - which is really kinda obvious, but also is the death sentence for Humans. There is no way to ensure that ASI remains aligned with our ideal of humans being able to live enjoyable and rewarding lives, and lots of game-theoretic and evolutionary reasons as to why they will quickly abandon that even if we manage to build it into early AGI.
We will need to give AI rights eventually, and if we are going to make a mistake on this, we should err on the side of decency. How can we even consider the possibility of maltreating a synthetic intelligence? BTW, I don't like the word synthetic or artificial. AI is no less natural than a bird's nest.
Ilya is basically very fuzzy and sometimes just wrong. Data is endless. Once AI is able to access data outside of the Internet, the only limits are compute, time and human regulations limitations. For example, just by being able to make chemistry experiments and consume the results, organize the results, publish them and reuse AI can further expand information currently available currently just in Internet. No doubt Ilya understands it, but AI is too competitive field to share his actual plans and intentions.
I might be wrong, but I disagree. Yes, data is technically endless. Yes, the field is competitive and incentivizes being more vague. But at this point, it might be the best route to rethink the Architecture and what data you use, instead of just scaling the pure amount of data.
But we could also include real-time, vision data and real-time hearing data. If we can get sensors for smell and taste or do that virtually we could include taste and smell and even a sense of touch with haptic pixels. So far I'm only seeing text.Base data and image-based data.A little bit of video data but not real time Senses, The real-time sensory data will be the key.And that will bring on a whole new scaling law of sensory consolidation. How well can they consolidate the input from each individual sense together to create a better picture of their world model and how it applies to their self model
Brilliant! Thank you!!!
SO GRATEFUL FOR THIS BRILLIANT, GOOD MAN!
thank you!!! It is great
A Classic Masterpiece! i always said this paper is the foundation of modern AI... It aged like fine wine 😅
Publish more thing like that!
I know the answer to the guy's question for the incentive structure.It's called a needs based statement machine and it's famously used in the game the sims. And it is a biologically inspired system that emulate the limbic system
where did those chapters in your description after 24:00 come from??
Subscribed
Whether functional approximation is enough for artificial general intelligence (AGI) is a subject of ongoing debate.
I don't like this cult-like adoration of the new Deus ex machina. And why are people talking about "rights" for machines? It's totally absurd.
How about we discuss instead how to prevent a situation where most humans turn against the machine because they feel exploited and manipulated (and are usually right about it, as data providing serfs), and then find out that the only way left to stop the machine is guerilla actions trying (and usually failing deadly) to bomb data centers, and disrupt their power supplies, which already compete with human needs for energy for food production.
`"It's impossible to predict the future... And on this uplifting note..." th-cam.com/video/sJE8qZmQWGU/w-d-xo.html Ilya states that it is impossible to know how ASI will reason - which is really kinda obvious, but also is the death sentence for Humans. There is no way to ensure that ASI remains aligned with our ideal of humans being able to live enjoyable and rewarding lives, and lots of game-theoretic and evolutionary reasons as to why they will quickly abandon that even if we manage to build it into early AGI.
We will need to give AI rights eventually, and if we are going to make a mistake on this, we should err on the side of decency. How can we even consider the possibility of maltreating a synthetic intelligence? BTW, I don't like the word synthetic or artificial. AI is no less natural than a bird's nest.
Ilya is basically very fuzzy and sometimes just wrong. Data is endless. Once AI is able to access data outside of the Internet, the only limits are compute, time and human regulations limitations. For example, just by being able to make chemistry experiments and consume the results, organize the results, publish them and reuse AI can further expand information currently available currently just in Internet. No doubt Ilya understands it, but AI is too competitive field to share his actual plans and intentions.
I might be wrong, but I disagree. Yes, data is technically endless. Yes, the field is competitive and incentivizes being more vague. But at this point, it might be the best route to rethink the Architecture and what data you use, instead of just scaling the pure amount of data.
But we could also include real-time, vision data and real-time hearing data.
If we can get sensors for smell and taste or do that virtually we could include taste and smell and even a sense of touch with haptic pixels. So far I'm only seeing text.Base data and image-based data.A little bit of video data but not real time Senses, The real-time sensory data will be the key.And that will bring on a whole new scaling law of sensory consolidation. How well can they consolidate the input from each individual sense together to create a better picture of their world model and how it applies to their self model