Honestly I don't think that that test was showing that the deus2 is any worse than the equinox 900. It would be interesting to see what the Equinox 900 with the standard coil was hitting in comparison with the deus 2 with the standard coil.. that would give a more real world experience . Also are you using the deus2 in multi-frequency? Or are you using it in 10 hz. The same as the Equinox 900? I just want to see these two side by side with a closer test to get a real expectation from both. Thanks.🏴☠️
He has 900 at 10khz and Deus II at like 13.5 khz. He was also swinging about 3+ inches off of the ground which makes a big difference. He said what the iron bias was on Deus but not on the 900. The problem with this is that trash around targets is going to have a huge effect on signal. If there is a coin there, most likely there will be trash or iron.
Hello, what do you prefer, Deus 2 or Minelap Equinox 900? I was thinking of buying Equinox 900, but I'm confused because people around me say Deus 2 is better. Can you give me an idea
@@bakikilli7067 If I had to choose between these two, I would choose D2, but both of these detectors are very good... NOX 900 will be much easier to use...
When you compare depth of two metal detectors you can not use any reactivity, silencer or any other filters!! Because first, how you know one reactivity or whatever is equal to the other?! You can't! Next, how you would find what is maximum capability of the machine?! You can't. It could have more potential than you think. You should boost both detectors to its maximum stable settings and test it in this way. And decide - dig or not dig. For Deus for an instance - react - 0, silencer - 0, sens - 92-94 or more if can, no any other stupid (stupid coz is nothing more than cutting the signal at some decibel point, rarely I use them) filters like b. caps auto ground etc. And manual gb balance. Same for Equi. Do it again. Nice range.
@@jackthetemplar7492 grunt to lekka glina z piaskiem, jałowa ziemia ,tylko pola uprawne jak wszędzie w Polsce. Sąsiad ora pola raz na 4 lata, a ma kilka fajnych gdzie znajdowały się karczmy czy szlaki. Teraz ziemia od sierpnia już jest ubita bez powietrza. I chciałbym te głębsze cele wyciągnąć
@@radekwojdyga7300 wystrzegam się takich ocen...który najgłębszy bo to zależy od warunków glebowych. Taka odpowiedź może też spowodować wojenki detektorystyczne bo ile osób tyle zdań 😉 Więc tak jak wszystkie kobiety są piękne tak wszystkie wykrywacze są najgłębsze ;-))))))
No i mnie zdziwko strzelilo, bylem pewny ze 900 jako VLF bedzie głebsza nizli D2, i jak sie wahalem miedzy tymi dwoma, tak dalej sie waham 🤦 tylko teraz juz totalnie
Super materiał .
Honestly I don't think that that test was showing that the deus2 is any worse than the equinox 900. It would be interesting to see what the Equinox 900 with the standard coil was hitting in comparison with the deus 2 with the standard coil.. that would give a more real world experience . Also are you using the deus2 in multi-frequency? Or are you using it in 10 hz. The same as the Equinox 900? I just want to see these two side by side with a closer test to get a real expectation from both. Thanks.🏴☠️
He has 900 at 10khz and Deus II at like 13.5 khz. He was also swinging about 3+ inches off of the ground which makes a big difference. He said what the iron bias was on Deus but not on the 900.
The problem with this is that trash around targets is going to have a huge effect on signal. If there is a coin there, most likely there will be trash or iron.
Sizce demir ve civi arazide en iyi dedektör ve derin olan hangisi
Altın ile test yapılsa ekinox kazanır
Nice test.
Молодец, отличний тест.
great test my friend
D2🎉❤
D2🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Hello, what do you prefer, Deus 2 or Minelap Equinox 900?
I was thinking of buying Equinox 900, but I'm confused because people around me say Deus 2 is better. Can you give me an idea
@@bakikilli7067 If I had to choose between these two, I would choose D2, but both of these detectors are very good... NOX 900 will be much easier to use...
@@jackthetemplar7492 They say Nox 900 is better in pastures and hard soils, while D2 is better in soft soils, is it true?
When you compare depth of two metal detectors you can not use any reactivity, silencer or any other filters!!
Because first, how you know one reactivity or whatever is equal to the other?! You can't! Next, how you would find what is maximum capability of the machine?! You can't. It could have more potential than you think.
You should boost both detectors to its maximum stable settings and test it in this way. And decide - dig or not dig. For Deus for an instance - react - 0, silencer - 0, sens - 92-94 or more if can, no any other stupid (stupid coz is nothing more than cutting the signal at some decibel point, rarely I use them) filters like b. caps auto ground etc. And manual gb balance. Same for Equi.
Do it again. Nice range.
Create your own channel... and implement your testing rules... I'll be happy to watch...
Regards
I'm a hunter, not tuber or blogger. I would not show it even if I have it.
The XPD2 would have hit the target harder if reactivity lowered to 0, even 1. Nice comparison vid.
Testi altın ile yapsanız
D1 34x28 Test 3 Makina Test
witch best 900 ?
watch the movie... you'll see 😉
@@jackthetemplar7492 this movie nothing say ,
@@monacocross4241 Then there's nothing I can do about it... 😉
No D2 pięknie dał radę, pomimo mniejszej cewki 💪 pozdrowionka 👍
Deus2 best ever!
Jack może pomożesz?
Pacjent D2, chce na czystym terenie sięgnąć głębiej. Co powiesz
Na odległość raczej nie pomogę... nie wiem jaki grunt, jakie teoretyczne cele itd. Jest wiele zmiennych...
@@jackthetemplar7492 grunt to lekka glina z piaskiem, jałowa ziemia ,tylko pola uprawne jak wszędzie w Polsce. Sąsiad ora pola raz na 4 lata, a ma kilka fajnych gdzie znajdowały się karczmy czy szlaki. Teraz ziemia od sierpnia już jest ubita bez powietrza. I chciałbym te głębsze cele wyciągnąć
Kombinuj z czułością i korektą gruntu...do granicy w miarę stabilnej pracy. Na odległość nie pomogę...
Daj e-trac na skarpę zobaczymy czy dziadek ich nie ośmieszy 🎉
Nie ośmieszy, działa podobnie jak ctx. Pozdrawiam
@@jackthetemplar7492 to który według Ciebie najgłębszy z tych co testowałeś?
@@radekwojdyga7300 wystrzegam się takich ocen...który najgłębszy bo to zależy od warunków glebowych. Taka odpowiedź może też spowodować wojenki detektorystyczne bo ile osób tyle zdań 😉
Więc tak jak wszystkie kobiety są piękne tak wszystkie wykrywacze są najgłębsze ;-))))))
@@jackthetemplar7492peki sizce demir ve civi li arazide en iyi dedektör hangisi
En español fuera guenial
😊no, etrak best😂😂 coli18
No i mnie zdziwko strzelilo, bylem pewny ze 900 jako VLF bedzie głebsza nizli D2, i jak sie wahalem miedzy tymi dwoma, tak dalej sie waham 🤦 tylko teraz juz totalnie
Nice test.