My old music teacher in school used to tell I'm not able to hit higher notes right because of "my genetics" not his crapy teaching and none existing believe in my voice.
You should find your natural vocal range - th-cam.com/video/ArVkyaMQiSI/w-d-xo.html - then work to extend it higher and lower - th-cam.com/video/EecSsVgM3TM/w-d-xo.html
#3 is NOT A MYTH. One CAN "place" a sound forward, backward or neutral dependent on tongue position, mouth embouchure and pharyngeal contraction. Teachers have been teaching for centuries, hundreds of books have been written about. But suddenly its not true? Cmon now. While it is true that is is proprioception does play a part, certain sensations are universal across all singers. Sound CAN be made to resonate in different places in the vocal tract based on how you manipulate certain parameters from the diaphragm to the lips. #5 - Yes and No. What separates those with bad voices from good voices from amazing voices IS NATURAL TALENT. Then and ONLY then does training come into the equation. Many legendary singers had NO formal training, yet are still revered for their ability to connect with a listener. Training can only take someone so far. Some people are NOT cut out to be certain things - even mediocre ones. I could train with the best coaches and be on that court every single day, but I will never be Michael Jordan. I'm just not physically coordinated for that activity. Singing is no different. Natural inclination HAS to be there. Can everyone learn to carry a tune? Sure. And if that's all they want to do then fine. But if you want to be noticed, be successful at it - take it it to the next level - there HAS to be a given inclination for singing already there. Cases in point - Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Rod Stewart, Michael Jackson, Amy Whinehouse - etc. Compelling, emotional evoking singers. Little to ZERO training when they became famous, but they had something there - something you can't teach. All vocal training can do is improve what you already have in terms of natural skills - so yes, training can help - but truly great singers ARE born first then trained to be even better.
You can be a great singer and still not be "as good as" Michael Jackson. Chris Martin isn't as good of a singer as Stevie Wonder, but he's a great singer! No need for the negativity, because anyone can learn to be a good singer with proper instruction and technique! If anyone is interested in how to do that, keep watching our content here, and take a deeper look into www.30daysinger.com!
My old music teacher in school used to tell I'm not able to hit higher notes right because of "my genetics" not his crapy teaching and none existing believe in my voice.
You should find your natural vocal range - th-cam.com/video/ArVkyaMQiSI/w-d-xo.html - then work to extend it higher and lower - th-cam.com/video/EecSsVgM3TM/w-d-xo.html
Me gustan estas clases!! Me encantaría si tuvieran subtítulos en español 🤓
I got a 30 day singer ad
This is another reason I joined 30DS. They're very serious about technique & health.
Heck yes! We want to enable to you keep on singing for years to come.
Great video I enjoyed it, but please I want to know if there are some certain foods that are not to be eaten inorder to be a good singer
Wow! Great video! Please what should be the position of the tongue on the 'Sssss' breathing/exhaling sound? Thank you
Flat and relaxed.
Is there a difference between Bel Canto and Del Monte?
I'd ike to see one to one Sing at my Father's funeral
That is so lovely, please let us know how it goes. Condolences
#3 is NOT A MYTH. One CAN "place" a sound forward, backward or neutral dependent on tongue position, mouth embouchure and pharyngeal contraction. Teachers have been teaching for centuries, hundreds of books have been written about. But suddenly its not true? Cmon now.
While it is true that is is proprioception does play a part, certain sensations are universal across all singers. Sound CAN be made to resonate in different places in the vocal tract based on how you manipulate certain parameters from the diaphragm to the lips.
#5 - Yes and No. What separates those with bad voices from good voices from amazing voices IS NATURAL TALENT. Then and ONLY then does training come into the equation. Many legendary singers had NO formal training, yet are still revered for their ability to connect with a listener. Training can only take someone so far.
Some people are NOT cut out to be certain things - even mediocre ones. I could train with the best coaches and be on that court every single day, but I will never be Michael Jordan. I'm just not physically coordinated for that activity. Singing is no different. Natural inclination HAS to be there. Can everyone learn to carry a tune? Sure. And if that's all they want to do then fine. But if you want to be noticed, be successful at it - take it it to the next level - there HAS to be a given inclination for singing already there.
Cases in point - Jim Morrison, Janis Joplin, Rod Stewart, Michael Jackson, Amy Whinehouse - etc. Compelling, emotional evoking singers. Little to ZERO training when they became famous, but they had something there - something you can't teach.
All vocal training can do is improve what you already have in terms of natural skills - so yes, training can help - but truly great singers ARE born first then trained to be even better.
You can be a great singer and still not be "as good as" Michael Jackson. Chris Martin isn't as good of a singer as Stevie Wonder, but he's a great singer! No need for the negativity, because anyone can learn to be a good singer with proper instruction and technique! If anyone is interested in how to do that, keep watching our content here, and take a deeper look into www.30daysinger.com!
Does mask placed head voice really exist?
"Mask” head voice is just head voice with a specific placement (which is a forward placement)
@@30DaySinger I heard that term does not exist on vocal pedagogy