My neighbor here in Orlando Florida in the 90s ( now an 88 yrs old lady ) shot one of the largest Bobcat on record in the state on her backyard at the edge of the woods ( by Boggy Creek ) It was a 20-25 yards shot, she used a 32 H&R MAG revolver with gold dot bullet. 💪 When she called her son to tell him, he was in a busy public place on a cell phone, the call was braking up and all he heard was I shot Bob!, I shot Bob!. Everyone rushed to her property only to find this huge 30 lbs cat dead from a single shot.
@@jacobackley502 - I love my I-frame .32 S&W. I sure wish they'd come out with the i-frame again with modern materials. For that matter, if they re-introduced a modern-made tip-up safety hammerless in, say, .32 acp or .380 ... ah, I'm dreamin'.
Sam You are helping People to re-discover the benefits of .32 Caliber Handguns. IF anyone bothers to do the research and look into what our Great Grandparents generation carried they would be amazed at how popular .32,s were! There was and IS a reason for that!! The .32,s offer a good balance between penetration and FAST follow up shots as well as being fairly easy to shoot. The low report and lack of muzzle flash/blast also aid in placing those bullets where ya want them to go. Do NOT underestimate a .32! That Caliber has put a LOT of people under the lawn mower over the years.
I think Smith & Wesson should bring back their 32 caliber J-frame lineup instead of going for ultra-light 357 Magnums. All the 32 caliber loadings fit the bill so well in a small gun.
32 H&R mag is my favorite round. I love my 38 too but there's something about that balance between decent power and reduced recoil which makes me love 32's of all kinds.
Yeah, the .32 H&R in particular is perfect because of how easy it can have velocity. Even a .22 LR will struggle to get 900 FPS with a 40 gr in a pistol, but the .32 H&R easily pushes an 85 gr at 1,000 FPS in a snub.
I reloaded thousands of 32 H&R with the little Hornady swaged lead bullet. It was the perfect round. If I had know they were going to drop it I would have gotten a lifetime supply.
Same here. I found that for hand loading, the .32 H&R is most practical because you can easily get anything going over 1,000 FPS in a snub with low recoil, but flat shooting.
Down to my last 2000 Hornady swaged lead SWC bullets. I also wished I bought more of them. I used to buy 10,000 at a time. Plenty of hard cast out there from 78gr. to 115gr. to use in their place.
Good job Sam & TY. A Swiss Army knife can be deadly in the right hands. I like 38 over 32 bigger hole more readily available in a larger variety. I think 380 better than 9 for same reasons you like 32. & you have the hand eye to make it work.
@@GunSam Thanks! I'll remember them the next time I buy cast boolits. The ones I have now came from Stateline (out of Pennsylvania) The consistency in quality, personal attention to questions along with the price has me pretty happy.
Not in reference to this particular video, but one of the citations from the detractors of regular .38 spl wadcutters is the proportionally skinny wound tracks in gel. Having had the misfortune of shooting a living critter with a full wadcutter, the real world wound track was very significant. Today there is ammo available that reliably expands from shorter barrels but I wouldn't feel the slightest bit unarmed with wc or swc in a snubby 38.
What's funny is people's comparison to the .38 as if it were a .22 or something. I have shot many raccoons with .22's and with body shots it's like 5-6 rounds before they slowly die. With a .38 Special, I body shot one once and it was full "stopping power" and instant death.
Keep up the great work. I really enjoy your videos. Even though I carry a Glock daily, I'm a huge .38 snubby fan. I think they'll always be relevant in our lifetime. I keep one stashed nearby. Hoping the factory ammo will come down eventually
I don't even mind carrying the 158gr LRN. Currently I have the american eagle 158gr LRN in my 856 snub. It's accurate and controllable. My aunt shot a coyote with this load from her lady Smith at like 40 yards. Lucky shot on her par, but it put it down DRT immediately!!!
A major police department showed little improvement with SWC over LRN back in the 70s or 80s. Maybe. But on small to medium game I know what bullet I would prefer and have used. SWC takes game animals pretty well. Probably just the threshold of enough most of the time. .38 Special LRN is about a 60% load defensively. SWC a bit better but maybe not enough to see in multiple incidents. Statistics are very funny critters. 60% isn't as bad as it sounds. These are milder handgun rounds. They do a good job for what they are.
For some reason I never realized that (soft) lead bullets would have less bore drag resulting in less recoil for the same velocity but, it makes perfect sense and helps explain something. Thanks for the upload.
Every time you test the Federal 158 grain I like it better for 442 sized J frames. Balance is always power versus recoil and it seems to have a good balance.
I have the Underwood equivalent in my 442. The box says 843 fps but that's in a 4" so I called Underwood and asked what that would be in a 442 and they told me subtract 50fps per inch. So it's 740 which is perfect. Standard pressure. I don't expect expansion in a 2" barrel so 158 grain is definitely the way to go.
I’m thinking the .32 H&R Mag with these rounds in a short-barreled or 4” revolver would be a devastating home defense round for the recoil shy or those with arthritic hands who don’t want to deal with the increased recoil of .38/9mm calibers and larger. I’ve always favored .38+P & .45 ACP for home defense, but I may be looking to drop some coin for .a 32 Mag as I grow older and my hands hurt more. Seems like a superb balance between my beloved .32 S&W Long and the beastly .327 Federal Mag. Thanks Sam for yet another informative and awesome video! 👍
Nicely done! Always a pleasure to watch you do your comparison videos. 👍 The 9mm was no surprise. No eye opening experience there. 158 SWC is what I typically shoot in my DA 38's. A good "yardstick" to judge other loads. Also load a lot of 173gr Keith SWC. Turns a snubnose into a thumper! No jacketed bullets in my 38's. Not enough velocity to open up well. Now that little 32 was interesting. It performs right up there with a slight advantage over the 38. I was impressed! Again, nicely done!👍
I regularly do carry the old 158gr lead round nose in my 38's. I know it's against popular opinion, but it works for me. But just an hour ago, I replaced the LRN in my 38 S&W 642 with some plus P Hornady 110 gr critical defense rounds. I do change ammo from time to time. I do enjoy watching videos like yours and trying to decide what a guy should use. I really think shot placement or just quick, multiple shots are more important than bullet type or caliber. Thanks for the time and effort you put into these videos. I do enjoy your channel. And I'll have to say, you are a very decent shot Sam. And I'd like to add. I don't think there is much difference between round nose bullets and the flat tip, semi or full wadcutters. Maybe some, but not enough to matter.
I don't know the difference in lower velocity rounds but in the higher velocity they definitely make a difference. Even at 1100fps I've got some home cast flat points that do just as good as a hollow point. That is just my experience. I'm not trying to change your mind or say your stupid for what you carry. You need to pick what you think is the best round for you and to me the best thing for you is that you carry.
@@GunSam Your videos are the reason I picked up 2 boxes of the Hornady 110 gr for my 38's. One box of standard velocity for my 2 non-plus P revolvers and a box of plus P's for my Smith 642. I do have a few other boxes of assorted 38 HP's. But from your test,I like the 110 Hornadys the best,for when I get in the mood to carry HP's. Your testing of various calibers and bullet types are some of the best on TH-cam. I've got some of the old Federal blue plastic coated Nyclad standard velocity 125gr 38 Hollow points I got with a late 90's Rossi stainless model 88 snub 38. Have you ever tested them? They were really recommend back in the day, when we read gun magazines instead of watching TH-cam. I carry them occasionally. Buy in my limited testing , I found them to have shallow penetration.
@@biggunshandguns3687 Thanks for the very respectful comment. That is something missing way too much now a days. I've carried for many years. I got my 1st handgun, an old RG14-6 shot double action 22 revolver when I was 12. I carried it all over our farm and honestly shot the crap out of it. I'm in my 50's now. I've carried and owned a whole lot of handguns in between those years. Everything from 22 short to 480 Ruger,and most in between. I've watched the advice go from "They all fall to 45 hardbal"- to all of the wonder bullets being recommended and changing every week. Lol. I probably would load up my 38's with semi-wadcutters to get more of an edge if I could find any. Any extra is always a good thing! But all I ever find around here are either round nose or Hollow points. Only flat tip 38 ammo is some 130gr FMJ flat nose. And I do carry it at times too. I've got my speed strip I carry in my pocket to reload my 38's I carry loaded with those loads right now.
@@shadowwolf2524 that is one good thing about casting my own bullets I should always have extra but I do get a bit lazy at times. Except for the rg we've followed pretty much the same path and I to am in my 50s. I've pretty much gone all the way around and back to the 45acp for fun guns I like the 45 colt and the 480 but I shoot it out of a bfr now. I think they are way too many guys that just regurgitate the stupid shit they read on the internet. Like said I don't care what anybody carries just don't tell me how stupid you think I am about my choice. I've tested a lot of stuff and shoot a lot so I'd like to think despite my choice of ammo I'll hit where it needs to be hit
Back in the day Customs wanted a .38 that would expand from a snubbie. They asked Winchester to load a round that would do 1,000 fps from a 2" snubbie and the Treasury Load was born. We tested some of it in gel from a 2" 642 and got 1006 fps 10" penetration and almost .70 expansion with 100% weight retention. Winchester lost the contract after about 6 or 7years as they shipped some without primers and they switched to Federal which wasn't as good. The Winchester bullet was a 110 gr jhp with a hollow base.
I would love to be carrying my favorite .32 h&r mag but charter arms has had it in for warranty work for almost two months now. Its a 3" professional btw. Very nice gun, just not ready for prime time in my opinion. I really appreciate these test btw, they are always helpful.
I have a Charter Arms Undercoverette 6 shot Aluminum framed 32 H&R on the way …Big fan of the 32 H&R The Charter Undercoverette is slightly smaller than a J frame , 12 oz and 6 shot vs a 5 shot 38 J frame The Hornady 80gr FTX 32 H&R has basically have the same performance as the 38spl 90gr FTX , with less recoil
Yeah, i'd say that Critical Defense 80 gr is the best load for .32 H&R Mag. In fact I think I got more consistent performance since the velocity was higher.
@@GunSam When I receive the Undercoverette… Im changing the hammer to DAO and also changing the grips to old style wooden panel grips.. after testing.. most likely will be pocket carry , jacket pocket carry and or Bug for my LCR 327
@@MrBuckeye63 I did the same thing, but for grips I went for the Eagle Arms Secret Service. The rubber does grip onto clothes but does provide better control. So its a tradeoff. I've been very happy with the Charter, people talk down on them. But my Ruger SP101 had to go back to the factory and after a trigger job with Wolf Springs the Charter still has a better and smoother trigger. Next on the list is a Charter Professional.
Recently I read a comment of someone who wrote that she is an OP nurse and did saw a lot of gun shot wounds. She also wrote that she never saw a removed hollow point bullet that did expand. She also wrote that there only two exceptions with slight expansion and in both cases the patient survived. If this is realy true than low powered lead rounds, flat nose swc or wc would be the best for overpenetration. Like this .32 load here.
@@scottcannon2242 Just because they made it into the OR doesnt mean that they survive. An exact hit in the head, heart or spine with fmj will kill just as fast. That she only saw none expanding bullets because the others didnt made it to the OR is a faint idea.
The 38 Special semi-wadcutter at that velocity is a good rabbit hunting round. Dispatches without exploding the rabbit, so there will be something left to eat. The 38/357 spectrum covers many uses. There is no shortage of good self-defense options. Hunting, target and plinking offerings should not be judged against the same criteria as $1.50 per round urban self-defense options.
And once again .32 rules the day! ;) Frankly, I was surprised the 9mm and .38 spl didn't penetrate more. Pleasantly surprised, in fact. I like the way you include missed shots. A lot of folks would edit those out but you clearly have a lot of integrity. I bet if the camera wasn't rolling you'd have gotten them all. Nothing like pressure, eh?
@@GunSam -Not bad at all. If you were shooting paper, most of your rounds were striking quite close together in between adjustments. Enviably good shooting, IMHO. :)
I just got a box of .38 special lead round nose and was wondering how they could possibly perform. This video is great timing. Thanks Sam :) As a revolver owner myself I'm glad your channel exists.
My Gramps (REtired Police Sgt) carried a 32H&R as back up/off duty gun. Worked bad area & gun was used several times in armed robbery interventions. It was a ole H&R top break. Sadly when He passed I was oversea's & by time I got home only the furniture nobody wanted left in home! ;( ! 32 got it done well 4 HiM
Those cans of soda are the most dangerous targets you could have chosen. The accuracy difference between 5 and 10 yards was as enlightening as the gel and chronograph tests.
Thanks for another good video. I carry either a 2” or 3” 38 special and you have helped me with the type of bullet I carry. I rotate between Hornady critical defense and 158 gr LSWc
Thanks for another great vid! I really want an LCR in 327 Fed Mag. I wanna use S&W 32 Long and 32 H&R mag in it. I'm guessing ammo in those calibers is almost impossible to find. However, I truly think it's the perfect gun for me and will force me into learning how to reload my practice ammo. Thanks for all the work that you do and for sharing your perspective!
I own the Ruger LCR 327 and I've shot 32 long, 32 short and 32 H&R mag through it. In my opinion they are VERY nice to shoot through that little revolver due to low felt recoil.
Sissy, that is what I do, mostly Hornady 32 H&R mag, cause that was more common locally to me. But, as was said, Buffalo Bore makes some very interesting loads in 32 mag and 32 S&W long. If you can find it Federal has a 100gr semi-jacketed soft point in both 327 and 32mag.
.32 H&R Magnum and .327 Federal Magnum are neat calibers but hard to find. .38 Special wadcutters should penetrate adequately but not too far like the round nose bullets. These days, that's what I would carry in .38 Special even in a medium frame gun.
Enjoyed the comparison, and the .38 Spl gets my vote -- especially if you load it with Underwood's 150 grain hard cast (BHN 21) hi-tek coated Double Ended Wad Cutter cartridges.
Great video! I bought a six pack of NA beer once by accident so I kinda know how you feel. You are way more entertaining to me than just about any “ certified entertainer person”!!
I have a Ruger SP101 (4" barrel) in .327 Fed Mag. Heavy factory loads with slow powder do get your attention, but what I like to do is make near max loads using fast pistol powder (Titegroup), with 100gr JHP bullets. This still gives respectable velocity while really taming the muzzle blast and recoil, making it a pleasant gun to shoot. The downside is large standard deviation in velocity, so I need to experiment some more.
Interesting. I was expecting better from the Win 9mm. Their generic HP's usually expand somewhat. SWC's are great for practice and casual small game hunting. The heavy Keirh SWC in 38 (usually 173 gr) is popular for small game and animal defense. I think BB loads it as well. The 32 H&R continues to impress in various areas. Looks like it would work well in the (thankfully few) jurisdictions where general use of HP's is not allowed.
The tumbling 32 is kind of a surprise - not sure if I'd call it as more effective for tissue damage, less effective for changing direction in medium and tracking away from vital target, or just kind of a wash.
I’ve always carried a 357 mag, both as a duty weapon and personal carry. Having learned about the 327 mag’s I had to have one. After doing some personal testing I’ve decided to carry the H&R MAG. ITS shootable, accurate and lethal. What else could I ask for.
It seems like you’ve just opened the door for a .32H&R Magnum - Vs - 30 Super Carry comparison. I’ve always liked the 32 H&R Magnum (S&W 431PD). You can carry 6 and still keep a fairly slim profile.
I'd really like to see a comparison using *good* hollow-point ammunition in these three calibers; 124gr Gold Dot in 9mm, 130gr HST +P in the .38, and something comparable to these in .32 H&R magnum.
I don't buy sodey pop anymore. I picked up a Sodastream and just make my own. And I ran into something interesting with that. I picked up some lemon seltzer water really cheap, which tasted horrible. But when mixed with my diet cola syrup, it's absolutely amazing. I had also picked up some raspberry seltzer water, which tastes really bad. Unfortunately, I ruined some of my diet cola syrup on that stuff. Bonus is, that raspberry seltzer water I got really cheap became what I call "target grade". It's carbonated, so it blows up really well. No sugar, so it doesn't make everything all sticky. And it actually smells really good after I shoot it. I think that seltzer water came out to less than 30 cents per bottle, so it's no great loss shooting it!
Been shooting some 158 gr hardcast lately in a 2" Kimber 357 (vel. about 1050 fps) and comparing to my Glock 26 9mm w/147 gr hardcast (@ 1075) Despite the similarities in power, the Glock has noticeably less recoil. I shot some rapid fire at an enraged boulder (about the size of a bear's head) and the Glock was easier to hit with in quick fire. Slow fire, they're about the same. Love that Kimber but so far, don't shoot it as well.
Thats simple to explain....the recoil is absorbed by the action of the automatics slide. The same holds true for a pump or over and under verses an automatic shotgun. The action of firing a round has to overcome the inertia of the action of said firearm.
@@GunSam Certainly. But you didn't just cut/clip a bunch of actual hits and throw out the misses. I'm no pro, but back years ago when I was much more active with revolvers, a 7" gong at 60 yards was a pretty easy target with a Blackhawk (7.5" barrel).
Great review - including the misses! I don't feel so bad with my misses 😆 Good comparisons. I just scored a Charter Professional H&R revolver. Waiting for ammo to arrive! Thanks for posting this video.
another wonderful video. eather revolvers you tested is wonderful for self defense. iam looking at this on the practical side . as far as over penetration how many people do you of that’s been killed by pass through bullets? here in North Carolina in the town of elkin I see at least 2-4 shootings a week in the larger cities of Winston-Salem , Greensboro, high point, Burlington . charolette drive by shooting, at bars , party’s. people getting shot, some killed or severely injured and some bystanders getting hit some pass throughs . the were taken to the hospital and later released with non life threatening injuries. it happens a lot . even our right to use deadly force laws say when the threat stop, you stop. no more threat. if they are still alive and the threat stops you stop. so any weapon that works flawlessly, accurate is worthy for self defense. if you look at Buffalo bore, under woods at there anti personnel ammunition for some calibers it’s swc and wad cutter . they have a self defense round for my 44 special that’s a 200 gr wad cutter . I enjoyed your video. nana and papa aka the hunter wishing you well.
Yeah, the few times I caught some gel pass throughs on the chronograph with low end rounds, it's typically like 150 FPS, the type of velocity that would bounce off a person.
Happens in LE sometimes 9mm ball mp5s back in day or couple incidents w .357 sig pass through. Not in civilian as to major injuries or killed to innocent ad far as I know . Back skin and clothes sap what little energy is left it seems. Know one case grandson and his buddy attacked grandpa at door home invasion style...Grandpa was a vet....32 acp I believe ball with both on top got one shot 2 hit lol...
I couldn't see the cans on my phone screen. Lol. You could have said you hit them all first round. Lol. Now you should have to drink the sugary soda. 😆
Nice comparison video. I was waiting for you to run up on those sodas and unload. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Have you ever done a barrel length test on the 9mm White box 9mm 115gr. JHP ammo? It’s generic but I’d like to see it. I was a surprised that it didn’t expand more than it did. Well thanks again for the entertaining videos.
A lot of information here. These tests are one reason why I have switched to the Taurus 327 mag snub nose as an all day carry weapon, even with the 32 H&R mag ammo you have great performance with little to no recoil allowing for faster follow up shots.
I enjoy your videos you have a unique test routine different from other channels. Did you make your own target benches? Nice job. I’d like to make something like that.
Wouldn't wad cutters be a little better for self defense? I've always thought they would do a little more damage and penetrate a bit less than SWC or round nose. It's surprising how few non +P defensive loads there are for 38spl. I have an old Charter with some sentimental value so I don't want to risk damaging it. I really don't carry it but it would be nice to have something for it.
Before I get into the meat of this, I'm gonna guess yes, either will get the job done, while not doing anything over-the-top either damage-wise or penetration-wise
I have a Smith & Wesson model 60 snow nose. I have an order coming in for 158 grain semi-wads to try. I was surprised about the overpenetration of those. I'm guessing if there was bone involved and maybe a heavy winter coat that might reduce the penetration? I'll have to give these a try as I was thinking about using them for self-defense. Also it's difficult at this point in time finding the 38 special semi-wads as many places online are out of stock of those now. Thanks for doing this video as it gave me more of an idea what the 38 semi-wads could do.
Bummer, that's disappointing about the Winchesters. Shooting the Bull 410 actually had good success with them out of a three-inch barrel with both bare synthetic clear gel and denim-covered 10% calibrated ballistics gel with an average of just over 14 inches in both gels (9 shots total; one exited the side). None of the 9 exceeded 15.75".They weren't pretty but the did expand.
I would like to see you do a test of the difference in velocity, 20' accuracy and penetration between a 2" Charter Arms and the 3" Defender Charter Arms. Or is there enough of a difference to matter?
If you need test subject ideas, I would love to see a comparison between two and three-inch snubby barrels with .32 H&R Magnum. I carry a three-incher, and have read that that extra inch adds 100 feet per second. If you have done this before forgive me? By the way, I really like the recent emphasis on ballistic gel tests rather than water jugs............................elsullo
You’re really forcing my hand here.. the Ruger LCR 327 is looking pretty good… get me some 32 long and mag with it and I’ll be set… and maybe some wad cutters.. 🤔
I would like your opinion of the Rock Island m200 I've only had it a few months and have sent it back twice for warranty but I love the size and the way it fits my hand.
I have owned both the M200 and the M206 (the snubby). I've heard some people say they had to have work done on both of them (timing and various other reasons) but I happened to get revolvers that worked perfectly right out of the box. Both are easy to shoot because of their weight. It helped me with felt recoil. I had about a 500 round break in period with mine. Unfortunately I had to sell both of them a few years ago because I needed some cash due to a family emergency. Sometimes I miss having them.
Nice comparison. The .32 H&R did very well. I would like to see the .32 H&R brought back. Currently no one other than Charter Arms is making guns chambered for this round. Rugers .327 Federal magnums will chamber it as you are using the LCR in .327. Ammo is currently unavailable for any .32 revolver cartridges. I can not feed them due to the ammo shortage and lack of reloading equipment and supplies.
Academy Sports & Outdoors has the .32 S&W Long LRN for $35/50 rds. as of Dec 2021. Not cheap but available. They seem to be much more expensive elsewhere.
Comments Did u change the recording technique? In this video the gunshots didn't transmit through my speakers too loud and hurt my ears. .32 fan here too. I'd like Ruger to make an LCR dedicated to . 32 only, not . 327, so it dould be at least as light as their.38. Ruger lcr's with the grip removed and taped up instead is my favorite pocket gun configuration, more compact, a little lighter, and, for me at least, grips and points more naturally.
Theres definitely better choices out there but they'd probably get the job done. IDK what the prices are in Michigan but down here a 12pk of Pepsi is about $5.50, and that's before tax. Even shooting Pepsi cans is expensive these days lol.😀😡💩
Is it better than nothing, and options for disabled, elderly or big time recoil sensitive against Uncommitted Attackers Or only cns headshots. Even heart shot maybe do very little to just one chamber. Problem is so many bad guys w 9mms that will shoot a lot and run around firing at you. U need at least 9mm 350 ft lbs expanding jhp for that or .45 ball or better to try to stop their deadly actions as quickly as possible IMO. .38 a a top jhp is even questionable if snub for Determined Attackers but ok if 3" or longer like 856 Defender. Having said that would love a longer barrel sp101 in .327 if that and .32 HR magnum weren't so expensive. A LONG Barrel on one and 6 shots w gold dots is formidable for an elder person or even still good choice w .32 H&R magnum for Granny it seems after watching all Gun Sam's vids. I do have a vid for choices for disabled and elderly. Can u ever find 1k of .32 magnum for not too crazy expensive Sam???
People massively underestimate the penetration of light wadcutter loadings. Loading a 95 grain .32 non-expanding wadcutter to 1020 fps (even nominally) is actually pretty silly and I'm surprised Federal offers it as a factory load. The only purpose I can think of is an intentionally snappier training round for people who carry expensive premium defensive .32 H&R ammo. (Does that even exist?) Anyway, a 95 grain .32 at 700 fps will penetrate satisfactorily for defensive purposes, which is well inside .32 S&W Long territory. Shooting expanding bullets is the specific purpose for which .32 H&R was invented and without them it would seem to offer little advantage over its parent cartridge.
Looks like any bad guy will be safe around you as long as he is carrying a Pepsi? Those are tricky to hit. I have a Colt 1903 hammerless in .32ac, I keep looking on the shelves for any ammo to feed it.
Yeah they are tiny. Looking back the way I edit this, it's like yeah how easy to hit those, but out there actually doing it from 23 yards is very difficult.
Another good and interesting video. Thanks for all the work you do with the shooting and putting these video together. Take care. PS: What do you think of .380 ACP FMJ ammo for self defense? Would the FMJ penetrate too much?
You can also watch MAC shoot .380 FMJ through an LCP and get devastating results and under 16 inches of penetration. The .380 FMJ overpenetration risk is over hyped. It is nothing compared to 9x19.
@@macriggland6526 Mac, Thanks. I appreciate the feedback. I just recently purchased a lower cost Bersa .380 ACP which seems to run well (need to put more rounds thru it) and was pondering the possibility of using it as a another carry gun vs my current 9 mm. Thanks again.
![[안방1열 풀캠4K] 베이비몬스터 'DRIP' (BABYMONSTER FullCam)│@SBS Inkigayo 241110](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/AQ4RIghEvUs/mqdefault.jpg)
My neighbor here in Orlando Florida in the 90s ( now an 88 yrs old lady ) shot one of the largest Bobcat on record in the state on her backyard at the edge of the woods ( by Boggy Creek )
It was a 20-25 yards shot, she used a 32 H&R MAG revolver with gold dot bullet. 💪
When she called her son to tell him, he was in a busy public place on a cell phone, the call was braking up and all he heard was I shot Bob!, I shot Bob!.
Everyone rushed to her property only to find this huge 30 lbs cat dead from a single shot.
I've carried various 32's over the years. Revolvers and auto's. I like the 32 and have always thought it is very underrated.
I agree STRONGLY!
Especially in the old I-frame smiths. Those light little revolvers carry so nicely and shoot really well
Love my 85 nickeled charter H&R magnum
@@jacobackley502 Those are great snubbies !
@@jacobackley502 - I love my I-frame .32 S&W. I sure wish they'd come out with the i-frame again with modern materials. For that matter, if they re-introduced a modern-made tip-up safety hammerless in, say, .32 acp or .380 ... ah, I'm dreamin'.
Sam You are helping People to re-discover the benefits of .32 Caliber Handguns. IF anyone bothers to do the research and look into what our Great Grandparents generation carried they would be amazed at how popular .32,s were! There was and IS a reason for that!! The .32,s offer a good balance between penetration and FAST follow up shots as well as being fairly easy to shoot. The low report and lack of muzzle flash/blast also aid in placing those bullets where ya want them to go. Do NOT underestimate a .32! That Caliber has put a LOT of people under the lawn mower over the years.
.32 usually gets you 6 in the wheel vs 5....one extra is a lot in limited capacity revolvers
I think Smith & Wesson should bring back their 32 caliber J-frame lineup instead of going for ultra-light 357 Magnums. All the 32 caliber loadings fit the bill so well in a small gun.
Yeah, the .32 H&R was really perfect for a J frame.
@@GunSam How about a 10-shot S&W Model 327 scandium pugnose? (modified from the current 8-shot 357 mag)
@sissydreams7494 That's an idea, although I personally prefer a 3-inch barrel. But yes, that would be interesting.
This is one of very few comments that aged really well
You got your wish…Check out the new S&W 432 and 632.
32 H&R mag is my favorite round. I love my 38 too but there's something about that balance between decent power and reduced recoil which makes me love 32's of all kinds.
Yeah, the .32 H&R in particular is perfect because of how easy it can have velocity. Even a .22 LR will struggle to get 900 FPS with a 40 gr in a pistol, but the .32 H&R easily pushes an 85 gr at 1,000 FPS in a snub.
@@GunSamhow does it compare to the federal 327 magnum?
I reloaded thousands of 32 H&R with the little Hornady swaged lead bullet. It was the perfect round. If I had know they were going to drop it I would have gotten a lifetime supply.
that was a foolish move on their part!
Same here. I found that for hand loading, the .32 H&R is most practical because you can easily get anything going over 1,000 FPS in a snub with low recoil, but flat shooting.
Hornady lately has dropped a few favorites. They'll realize their mistake soon enough.
Down to my last 2000 Hornady swaged lead SWC bullets. I also wished I bought more of them. I used to buy 10,000 at a time. Plenty of hard cast out there from 78gr. to 115gr. to use in their place.
Good job Sam & TY. A Swiss Army knife can be deadly in the right hands. I like 38 over 32 bigger hole more readily available in a larger variety. I think 380 better than 9 for same reasons you like 32. & you have the hand eye to make it work.
Once again, I love the 32 H&R Magnum!
Timely video.
_I recently started loading SWC & WC (type I & type II) for .38 and .357 mag._
If you can, try some Hornady swaged 158 SWC's. I found them to be very clean shooting.
@@GunSam Thanks! I'll remember them the next time I buy cast boolits.
The ones I have now came from Stateline (out of Pennsylvania)
The consistency in quality, personal attention to questions along with the price has me pretty happy.
Not in reference to this particular video, but one of the citations from the detractors of regular .38 spl wadcutters is the proportionally skinny wound tracks in gel. Having had the misfortune of shooting a living critter with a full wadcutter, the real world wound track was very significant. Today there is ammo available that reliably expands from shorter barrels but I wouldn't feel the slightest bit unarmed with wc or swc in a snubby 38.
What's funny is people's comparison to the .38 as if it were a .22 or something. I have shot many raccoons with .22's and with body shots it's like 5-6 rounds before they slowly die. With a .38 Special, I body shot one once and it was full "stopping power" and instant death.
Keep up the great work. I really enjoy your videos. Even though I carry a Glock daily, I'm a huge .38 snubby fan. I think they'll always be relevant in our lifetime. I keep one stashed nearby. Hoping the factory ammo will come down eventually
I don't even mind carrying the 158gr LRN. Currently I have the american eagle 158gr LRN in my 856 snub. It's accurate and controllable. My aunt shot a coyote with this load from her lady Smith at like 40 yards. Lucky shot on her par, but it put it down DRT immediately!!!
A major police department showed little improvement with SWC over LRN back in the 70s or 80s. Maybe. But on small to medium game I know what bullet I would prefer and have used. SWC takes game animals pretty well. Probably just the threshold of enough most of the time. .38 Special LRN is about a 60% load defensively. SWC a bit better but maybe not enough to see in multiple incidents. Statistics are very funny critters. 60% isn't as bad as it sounds. These are milder handgun rounds. They do a good job for what they are.
For some reason I never realized that (soft) lead bullets would have less bore drag resulting in less recoil for the same velocity but, it makes perfect sense and helps explain something. Thanks for the upload.
Every time you test the Federal 158 grain I like it better for 442 sized J frames. Balance is always power versus recoil and it seems to have a good balance.
I have the Underwood equivalent in my 442. The box says 843 fps but that's in a 4" so I called Underwood and asked what that would be in a 442 and they told me subtract 50fps per inch. So it's 740 which is perfect. Standard pressure. I don't expect expansion in a 2" barrel so 158 grain is definitely the way to go.
This is exactly what I was hoping to see!
You should be a .32 caliber ammo salesman.
He's not?! Haha! Just kidding, love the reviews, especially of the 32s
I really like soft lead in handguns. Hard cast for heavy bear repellant.
My first revolver came loaded from my step dad with 158 grain swc. Old Remington cases with 2 crimp bands. I keep it the same way to this day.
I’m thinking the .32 H&R Mag with these rounds in a short-barreled or 4” revolver would be a devastating home defense round for the recoil shy or those with arthritic hands who don’t want to deal with the increased recoil of .38/9mm calibers and larger. I’ve always favored .38+P & .45 ACP for home defense, but I may be looking to drop some coin for .a 32 Mag as I grow older and my hands hurt more. Seems like a superb balance between my beloved .32 S&W Long and the beastly .327 Federal Mag. Thanks Sam for yet another informative and awesome video! 👍
That little Ruger 327 mag has quickly become your favorite revolver. It seems like a well rounded caliber.
Nicely done! Always a pleasure to watch you do your comparison videos. 👍
The 9mm was no surprise. No eye opening experience there. 158 SWC is what I typically shoot in my DA 38's. A good "yardstick" to judge other loads. Also load a lot of 173gr Keith SWC. Turns a snubnose into a thumper! No jacketed bullets in my 38's. Not enough velocity to open up well.
Now that little 32 was interesting. It performs right up there with a slight advantage over the 38. I was impressed!
Again, nicely done!👍
I have 432pd, i had many guns but this one my favorite. Light and powerful 6 shot
I regularly do carry the old 158gr lead round nose in my 38's. I know it's against popular opinion, but it works for me. But just an hour ago, I replaced the LRN in my 38 S&W 642 with some plus P Hornady 110 gr critical defense rounds. I do change ammo from time to time. I do enjoy watching videos like yours and trying to decide what a guy should use. I really think shot placement or just quick, multiple shots are more important than bullet type or caliber. Thanks for the time and effort you put into these videos. I do enjoy your channel. And I'll have to say, you are a very decent shot Sam.
And I'd like to add. I don't think there is much difference between round nose bullets and the flat tip, semi or full wadcutters. Maybe some, but not enough to matter.
I don't know the difference in lower velocity rounds but in the higher velocity they definitely make a difference. Even at 1100fps I've got some home cast flat points that do just as good as a hollow point. That is just my experience. I'm not trying to change your mind or say your stupid for what you carry. You need to pick what you think is the best round for you and to me the best thing for you is that you carry.
Thank you. The 110+P is a decent load in my experience.
@@GunSam Your videos are the reason I picked up 2 boxes of the Hornady 110 gr for my 38's. One box of standard velocity for my 2 non-plus P revolvers and a box of plus P's for my Smith 642. I do have a few other boxes of assorted 38 HP's. But from your test,I like the 110 Hornadys the best,for when I get in the mood to carry HP's. Your testing of various calibers and bullet types are some of the best on TH-cam. I've got some of the old Federal blue plastic coated Nyclad standard velocity 125gr 38 Hollow points I got with a late 90's Rossi stainless model 88 snub 38. Have you ever tested them? They were really recommend back in the day, when we read gun magazines instead of watching TH-cam. I carry them occasionally. Buy in my limited testing , I found them to have shallow penetration.
@@biggunshandguns3687 Thanks for the very respectful comment. That is something missing way too much now a days. I've carried for many years. I got my 1st handgun, an old RG14-6 shot double action 22 revolver when I was 12. I carried it all over our farm and honestly shot the crap out of it. I'm in my 50's now. I've carried and owned a whole lot of handguns in between those years. Everything from 22 short to 480 Ruger,and most in between. I've watched the advice go from "They all fall to 45 hardbal"- to all of the wonder bullets being recommended and changing every week. Lol. I probably would load up my 38's with semi-wadcutters to get more of an edge if I could find any. Any extra is always a good thing! But all I ever find around here are either round nose or Hollow points. Only flat tip 38 ammo is some 130gr FMJ flat nose. And I do carry it at times too. I've got my speed strip I carry in my pocket to reload my 38's I carry loaded with those loads right now.
@@shadowwolf2524 that is one good thing about casting my own bullets I should always have extra but I do get a bit lazy at times. Except for the rg we've followed pretty much the same path and I to am in my 50s. I've pretty much gone all the way around and back to the 45acp for fun guns I like the 45 colt and the 480 but I shoot it out of a bfr now.
I think they are way too many guys that just regurgitate the stupid shit they read on the internet. Like said I don't care what anybody carries just don't tell me how stupid you think I am about my choice. I've tested a lot of stuff and shoot a lot so I'd like to think despite my choice of ammo I'll hit where it needs to be hit
Back in the day Customs wanted a .38 that would expand from a snubbie. They asked Winchester to load a round that would do 1,000 fps from a 2" snubbie and the Treasury Load was born. We tested some of it in gel from a 2" 642 and got 1006 fps 10" penetration and almost .70 expansion with 100% weight retention. Winchester lost the contract after about 6 or 7years as they shipped some without primers and they switched to Federal which wasn't as good. The Winchester bullet was a 110 gr jhp with a hollow base.
Great test! The old adage of using SWC if you can't get a hollow point is true for the .32. Take the Pepsi Challenge!
I would love to be carrying my favorite .32 h&r mag but charter arms has had it in for warranty work for almost two months now. Its a 3" professional btw. Very nice gun, just not ready for prime time in my opinion. I really appreciate these test btw, they are always helpful.
I have a Charter Arms Undercoverette
6 shot Aluminum framed 32 H&R on the way …Big fan of the 32 H&R
The Charter Undercoverette is slightly smaller than a J frame , 12 oz and 6 shot vs a 5 shot 38 J frame
The Hornady 80gr FTX 32 H&R has basically have the same performance as the 38spl 90gr FTX , with less recoil
Yeah, i'd say that Critical Defense 80 gr is the best load for .32 H&R Mag. In fact I think I got more consistent performance since the velocity was higher.
@@GunSam
When I receive the Undercoverette… Im changing the hammer to DAO and also changing the grips to old style wooden panel grips.. after testing.. most likely will be pocket carry , jacket pocket carry and or Bug for my LCR 327
@@MrBuckeye63 I did the same thing, but for grips I went for the Eagle Arms Secret Service. The rubber does grip onto clothes but does provide better control. So its a tradeoff. I've been very happy with the Charter, people talk down on them. But my Ruger SP101 had to go back to the factory and after a trigger job with Wolf Springs the Charter still has a better and smoother trigger. Next on the list is a Charter Professional.
Good stuff. Thanks for doing this work!
Thank you.
Recently I read a comment of someone who wrote that she is an OP nurse and did saw a lot of gun shot wounds. She also wrote that she never saw a removed hollow point bullet that did expand. She also wrote that there only two exceptions with slight expansion and in both cases the patient survived. If this is realy true than low powered lead rounds, flat nose swc or wc would be the best for overpenetration. Like this .32 load here.
@@scottcannon2242 Just because they made it into the OR doesnt mean that they survive. An exact hit in the head, heart or spine with fmj will kill just as fast. That she only saw none expanding bullets because the others didnt made it to the OR is a faint idea.
The 38 Special semi-wadcutter at that velocity is a good rabbit hunting round. Dispatches without exploding the rabbit, so there will be something left to eat. The 38/357 spectrum covers many uses. There is no shortage of good self-defense options. Hunting, target and plinking offerings should not be judged against the same criteria as $1.50 per round urban self-defense options.
And once again .32 rules the day! ;)
Frankly, I was surprised the 9mm and .38 spl didn't penetrate more. Pleasantly surprised, in fact. I like the way you include missed shots. A lot of folks would edit those out but you clearly have a lot of integrity. I bet if the camera wasn't rolling you'd have gotten them all. Nothing like pressure, eh?
Those are like 3" wide cans at nearly 70 feet away, I figured missing by an inch a few times doesn't make me look bad lol
@@GunSam -Not bad at all. If you were shooting paper, most of your rounds were striking quite close together in between adjustments. Enviably good shooting, IMHO. :)
For some reason I've always loved 38spl and I never get tired of videos about it. Thanks Sam. 👍👍
I just got a box of .38 special lead round nose and was wondering how they could possibly perform. This video is great timing. Thanks Sam :) As a revolver owner myself I'm glad your channel exists.
My Gramps (REtired Police Sgt) carried a 32H&R as back up/off duty gun. Worked bad area & gun was used several times in armed robbery interventions. It was a ole H&R top break. Sadly when He passed I was oversea's & by time I got home only the furniture nobody wanted left in home! ;( ! 32 got it done well 4 HiM
That Winchester white box 115 JHP is the Paul Harrell load. That's what he says he carries in his Beretta.
4.9" vs 3.2" is big difference in velocity to meet expansion threshold. Maybe sam will use it again in 5" to confirm
The 32 was more impressive than I had expected.
Great testing, and evaluation. Keep up the great work Sam! .38spl and then .32 H&R as a back up in a revolver. ♠️☯️🎩
Thank you.
The 32 H&R magnum and the 32 ACP are near perfect for small handguns
Also super fun in large handguns!
Those cans of soda are the most dangerous targets you could have chosen. The accuracy difference between 5 and 10 yards was as enlightening as the gel and chronograph tests.
Thanks for another good video. I carry either a 2” or 3” 38 special and you have helped me with the type of bullet I carry. I rotate between Hornady critical defense and 158 gr LSWc
Thanks for watching.
I've seen a lot of demo's. You are very detailed and practical. Thank you
Revisiting this video
Thanks to videos like this … the 32 family is making a comeback
Thanks for another great vid! I really want an LCR in 327 Fed Mag. I wanna use S&W 32 Long and 32 H&R mag in it. I'm guessing ammo in those calibers is almost impossible to find. However, I truly think it's the perfect gun for me and will force me into learning how to reload my practice ammo. Thanks for all the work that you do and for sharing your perspective!
I own the Ruger LCR 327 and I've shot 32 long, 32 short and 32 H&R mag through it. In my opinion they are VERY nice to shoot through that little revolver due to low felt recoil.
32 H&R magnum is on Buffalo Bore and Black Hills ammo. Underwood does NOT make a 32 H&R magnum. 32 S&W Long in wadcutters and LRN is out there also.
Sissy, that is what I do, mostly Hornady 32 H&R mag, cause that was more common locally to me. But, as was said, Buffalo Bore makes some very interesting loads in 32 mag and 32 S&W long. If you can find it Federal has a 100gr semi-jacketed soft point in both 327 and 32mag.
I still like my 148 grain wadcutters.
That's what I carry in my 3" Taurus 85. I like them very little recoil and shoot splendidly in that gun.
.32 H&R Magnum and .327 Federal Magnum are neat calibers but hard to find. .38 Special wadcutters should penetrate adequately but not too far like the round nose bullets. These days, that's what I would carry in .38 Special even in a medium frame gun.
Enjoyed the comparison, and the .38 Spl gets my vote -- especially if you load it with Underwood's 150 grain hard cast (BHN 21) hi-tek coated Double Ended Wad Cutter cartridges.
It's what I keep in mine
Great video!
I bought a six pack of NA beer once by accident so I kinda know how you feel.
You are way more entertaining to me than just about any “ certified entertainer person”!!
I always try to start engaging soda cans at longer ranges. If you let them get too close you risk those ferocious charges.
I have a Ruger SP101 (4" barrel) in .327 Fed Mag. Heavy factory loads with slow powder do get your attention, but what I like to do is make near max loads using fast pistol powder (Titegroup), with 100gr JHP bullets. This still gives respectable velocity while really taming the muzzle blast and recoil, making it a pleasant gun to shoot. The downside is large standard deviation in velocity, so I need to experiment some more.
Interesting. I was expecting better from the Win 9mm. Their generic HP's usually expand somewhat. SWC's are great for practice and casual small game hunting. The heavy Keirh SWC in 38 (usually 173 gr) is popular for small game and animal defense. I think BB loads it as well. The 32 H&R continues to impress in various areas. Looks like it would work well in the (thankfully few) jurisdictions where general use of HP's is not allowed.
The tumbling 32 is kind of a surprise - not sure if I'd call it as more effective for tissue damage, less effective for changing direction in medium and tracking away from vital target, or just kind of a wash.
Good idea w/ammo drought now any bullet is a Win-Win !! Got some hand rolled & work well Wife's gotta Taurus 85 airweight
I’ve always carried a 357 mag, both as a duty weapon and personal carry. Having learned about the 327 mag’s I had to have one. After doing some personal testing I’ve decided to carry the H&R MAG. ITS shootable, accurate and lethal. What else could I ask for.
It seems like you’ve just opened the door for a .32H&R Magnum - Vs - 30 Super Carry comparison. I’ve always liked the 32 H&R Magnum (S&W 431PD). You can carry 6 and still keep a fairly slim profile.
I'd really like to see a comparison using *good* hollow-point ammunition in these three calibers; 124gr Gold Dot in 9mm, 130gr HST +P in the .38, and something comparable to these in .32 H&R magnum.
You should get one of those nice folding tables Paul Harrell uses for shooting things like soda cans.
I thought about building a basic 2x2 ft "shoot" stand, basically half the size of my table I set my guns on at the beginning of videos.
There is a reason they still make .38SPL. It just works.
I don't buy sodey pop anymore. I picked up a Sodastream and just make my own. And I ran into something interesting with that. I picked up some lemon seltzer water really cheap, which tasted horrible. But when mixed with my diet cola syrup, it's absolutely amazing. I had also picked up some raspberry seltzer water, which tastes really bad. Unfortunately, I ruined some of my diet cola syrup on that stuff. Bonus is, that raspberry seltzer water I got really cheap became what I call "target grade". It's carbonated, so it blows up really well. No sugar, so it doesn't make everything all sticky. And it actually smells really good after I shoot it. I think that seltzer water came out to less than 30 cents per bottle, so it's no great loss shooting it!
Props for showing your misses 😀
Been shooting some 158 gr hardcast lately in a 2" Kimber 357 (vel. about 1050 fps) and comparing to my Glock 26 9mm w/147 gr hardcast (@ 1075) Despite the similarities in power, the Glock has noticeably less recoil. I shot some rapid fire at an enraged boulder (about the size of a bear's head) and the Glock was easier to hit with in quick fire. Slow fire, they're about the same. Love that Kimber but so far, don't shoot it as well.
Thats simple to explain....the recoil is absorbed by the action of the automatics slide. The same holds true for a pump or over and under verses an automatic shotgun. The action of firing a round has to overcome the inertia of the action of said firearm.
Thanks for showing your many misses (soda can shots). I'm sure you can hit stuff, but we all have off days. Being real. I like that.
They are like 3" wide at 70 feet away lol
@@GunSam Certainly. But you didn't just cut/clip a bunch of actual hits and throw out the misses.
I'm no pro, but back years ago when I was much more active with revolvers, a 7" gong at 60 yards was a pretty easy target with a Blackhawk (7.5" barrel).
Great review - including the misses! I don't feel so bad with my misses 😆 Good comparisons. I just scored a Charter Professional H&R revolver. Waiting for ammo to arrive! Thanks for posting this video.
Gun Sam with his shooting skill could kill a moose with a 22 LR... nuff said.
Excellent test. Thanks for all the work you put into this.
As I had figured wad cutters are unpredictable !
another wonderful video. eather revolvers you tested is wonderful for self defense. iam looking at this on the practical side . as far as over penetration how many people do you of that’s been killed by pass through bullets? here in North Carolina in the town of elkin I see at least 2-4 shootings a week in the larger cities of Winston-Salem , Greensboro, high point, Burlington . charolette drive by shooting, at bars , party’s. people getting shot, some killed or severely injured and some bystanders getting hit some pass throughs . the were taken to the hospital and later released with non life threatening injuries. it happens a lot . even our right to use deadly force laws say when the threat stop, you stop. no more threat. if they are still alive and the threat stops you stop. so any weapon that works flawlessly, accurate is worthy for self defense. if you look at Buffalo bore, under woods at there anti personnel ammunition for some calibers it’s swc and wad cutter . they have a self defense round for my 44 special that’s a 200 gr wad cutter . I enjoyed your video. nana and papa aka the hunter wishing you well.
Yeah, the few times I caught some gel pass throughs on the chronograph with low end rounds, it's typically like 150 FPS, the type of velocity that would bounce off a person.
Happens in LE sometimes 9mm ball mp5s back in day or couple incidents w .357 sig pass through. Not in civilian as to major injuries or killed to innocent ad far as I know . Back skin and clothes sap what little energy is left it seems. Know one case grandson and his buddy attacked grandpa at door home invasion style...Grandpa was a vet....32 acp I believe ball with both on top got one shot 2 hit lol...
I couldn't see the cans on my phone screen. Lol.
You could have said you hit them all first round. Lol.
Now you should have to drink the sugary soda. 😆
Great video thanks for the info sir.
Great video! Thanks.
Thanks.
Nice comparison video. I was waiting for you to run up on those sodas and unload. 🤣😂🤣😂🤣 Have you ever done a barrel length test on the 9mm White box 9mm 115gr. JHP ammo? It’s generic but I’d like to see it. I was a surprised that it didn’t expand more than it did. Well thanks again for the entertaining videos.
I have only used it here so far.
A lot of information here. These tests are one reason why I have switched to the Taurus 327 mag snub nose as an all day carry weapon, even with the 32 H&R mag ammo you have great performance with little to no recoil allowing for faster follow up shots.
I enjoy your videos you have a unique test routine different from other channels. Did you make your own target benches? Nice job. I’d like to make something like that.
The benches I made just for setting my stuff on, and yes I made them from basic 2x4's.
@@GunSam I wonder if anyone else would be interested in seeing how they are made? Something to think about next time you have to replace one.
I feel this is a valid test with possible real World applications.
Looks like you took the pepsi challenge and pepsi won, lol. Just kidding, I am enjoying your channel quite a bit and learning as well. Thanks.
Wouldn't wad cutters be a little better for self defense? I've always thought they would do a little more damage and penetrate a bit less than SWC or round nose. It's surprising how few non +P defensive loads there are for 38spl. I have an old Charter with some sentimental value so I don't want to risk damaging it. I really don't carry it but it would be nice to have something for it.
It's hard to say. I have shot SWC and WC into gel, and I guess I don't see a huge difference, except maybe a tad less penetration with the WC.
For defensive purposes, the swc has an advantage in speedloaders.
Another great Video, Sam! 👍
BTW, Have you tested a reversed .38 WC previously?
Before I get into the meat of this, I'm gonna guess yes, either will get the job done, while not doing anything over-the-top either damage-wise or penetration-wise
First shot: yep I was wrong!
Nice video!
I have Full Wad Cutters for my 38 Curious how that compares to semi wad cutters
I have a Smith & Wesson model 60 snow nose. I have an order coming in for 158 grain semi-wads to try. I was surprised about the overpenetration of those. I'm guessing if there was bone involved and maybe a heavy winter coat that might reduce the penetration?
I'll have to give these a try as I was thinking about using them for self-defense. Also it's difficult at this point in time finding the 38 special semi-wads as many places online are out of stock of those now.
Thanks for doing this video as it gave me more of an idea what the 38 semi-wads could do.
Bummer, that's disappointing about the Winchesters. Shooting the Bull 410 actually had good success with them out of a three-inch barrel with both bare synthetic clear gel and denim-covered 10% calibrated ballistics gel with an average of just over 14 inches in both gels (9 shots total; one exited the side). None of the 9 exceeded 15.75".They weren't pretty but the did expand.
Yep, a 9x19 that fails to expand has about the same risk of overpenetration as a .380 FMJ.
I would like to see you do a test of the difference in velocity, 20' accuracy and penetration between a 2" Charter Arms and the 3" Defender Charter Arms. Or is there enough of a difference to matter?
If you need test subject ideas, I would love to see a comparison between two and three-inch snubby barrels with .32 H&R Magnum. I carry a three-incher, and have read that that extra inch adds 100 feet per second. If you have done this before forgive me? By the way, I really like the recent emphasis on ballistic gel tests rather than water jugs............................elsullo
You’re really forcing my hand here.. the Ruger LCR 327 is looking pretty good… get me some 32 long and mag with it and I’ll be set… and maybe some wad cutters.. 🤔
Another great vid
Interesting results. Perp takes any of these in the pump it will accomplish the objective.
I would like your opinion of the Rock Island m200 I've only had it a few months and have sent it back twice for warranty but I love the size and the way it fits my hand.
I honestly have no experience with them.
@@GunSam if ever get the chance I'd please try one out when it comes to revolvers I have a lot of respect for your opinion.
I have owned both the M200 and the M206 (the snubby). I've heard some people say they had to have work done on both of them (timing and various other reasons) but I happened to get revolvers that worked perfectly right out of the box. Both are easy to shoot because of their weight. It helped me with felt recoil. I had about a 500 round break in period with mine. Unfortunately I had to sell both of them a few years ago because I needed some cash due to a family emergency. Sometimes I miss having them.
Your the first person ive ever heard say the copper adds barrel drag. Have you done any chronograph tests on that, I'd like to see them if you have.
yeah but they are old videos
th-cam.com/video/dIBjGERvZDM/w-d-xo.html
Yep I would rather shoot it than drink it
Nice comparison. The .32 H&R did very well. I would like to see the .32 H&R brought back. Currently no one other than Charter Arms is making guns chambered for this round. Rugers .327 Federal magnums will chamber it as you are using the LCR in .327. Ammo is currently unavailable for any .32 revolver cartridges. I can not feed them due to the ammo shortage and lack of reloading equipment and supplies.
Academy Sports & Outdoors has the .32 S&W Long LRN for $35/50 rds. as of Dec 2021. Not cheap but available. They seem to be much more expensive elsewhere.
try the 1895 Nagant, it will fire 32 Long as well
looked like the 38 second shot caught the tail end of the 9mm wound path
Comments
Did u change the recording technique? In this video the gunshots didn't transmit through my speakers too loud and hurt my ears.
.32 fan here too. I'd like Ruger to make an LCR dedicated to . 32 only, not . 327, so it dould be at least as light as their.38.
Ruger lcr's with the grip removed and taped up instead is my favorite pocket gun configuration, more compact, a little lighter, and, for me at least, grips and points more naturally.
Instead of putting gunpowder, they added cardboard as a primer to that 38 spl charge.
Theres definitely better choices out there but they'd probably get the job done. IDK what the prices are in Michigan but down here a 12pk of Pepsi is about $5.50, and that's before tax. Even shooting Pepsi cans is expensive these days lol.😀😡💩
Yeah, we even have that 10 cent deposit, but it depends, I would say the average price of a 12 pack is probably $4.50, and a 24 pack is about $8.50
Is it better than nothing, and options for disabled, elderly or big time recoil sensitive against Uncommitted Attackers Or only cns headshots. Even heart shot maybe do very little to just one chamber. Problem is so many bad guys w 9mms that will shoot a lot and run around firing at you. U need at least 9mm 350 ft lbs expanding jhp for that or .45 ball or better to try to stop their deadly actions as quickly as possible IMO. .38 a a top jhp is even questionable if snub for Determined Attackers but ok if 3" or longer like 856 Defender. Having said that would love a longer barrel sp101 in .327 if that and .32 HR magnum weren't so expensive. A LONG Barrel on one and 6 shots w gold dots is formidable for an elder person or even still good choice w .32 H&R magnum for Granny it seems after watching all Gun Sam's vids. I do have a vid for choices for disabled and elderly. Can u ever find 1k of .32 magnum for not too crazy expensive Sam???
ok sperg
Would have like to see how it compared to 125 gr LRN 9x19mm instead of the JHP
I haven't seen too many 9mm LRN before, but I have shot FMJ before. th-cam.com/video/8eFqbk2mFDA/w-d-xo.html
People massively underestimate the penetration of light wadcutter loadings. Loading a 95 grain .32 non-expanding wadcutter to 1020 fps (even nominally) is actually pretty silly and I'm surprised Federal offers it as a factory load. The only purpose I can think of is an intentionally snappier training round for people who carry expensive premium defensive .32 H&R ammo. (Does that even exist?)
Anyway, a 95 grain .32 at 700 fps will penetrate satisfactorily for defensive purposes, which is well inside .32 S&W Long territory. Shooting expanding bullets is the specific purpose for which .32 H&R was invented and without them it would seem to offer little advantage over its parent cartridge.
The only legitimate .32 H&R premium defensive load that I would say is good, id the Buffalo Bore +P one.
What do you think of the Remington HTP version that is a +P 158gr SWC hollow point?
th-cam.com/video/qRvVpiWbssM/w-d-xo.html
Do you have 357 and/or 32 rifles? Would be interesting to do a series comparing the same loads in revolver and carbine/rifle.
Looks like any bad guy will be safe around you as long as he is carrying a Pepsi? Those are tricky to hit. I have a Colt 1903 hammerless in .32ac, I keep looking on the shelves for any ammo to feed it.
Yeah they are tiny. Looking back the way I edit this, it's like yeah how easy to hit those, but out there actually doing it from 23 yards is very difficult.
Another good and interesting video. Thanks for all the work you do with the shooting and putting these video together. Take care. PS: What do you think of .380 ACP FMJ ammo for self defense? Would the FMJ penetrate too much?
Thanks. If I recall I think I did test some, and they didn't over-penetrate like some calibers do. So yeah they would be good I think.
@@GunSam Thanks, I appreciate your reply.
You can also watch MAC shoot .380 FMJ through an LCP and get devastating results and under 16 inches of penetration. The .380 FMJ overpenetration risk is over hyped. It is nothing compared to 9x19.
@@macriggland6526 Mac, Thanks. I appreciate the feedback. I just recently purchased a lower cost Bersa .380 ACP which seems to run well (need to put more rounds thru it) and was pondering the possibility of using it as a another carry gun vs my current 9 mm. Thanks again.
@@bobcatforever3485 Not a bad choice. If you can find .380 FMJ at a reasonable price!