Which is Better for Home Theater: (3) Kef R3 or (3) Kef R2c Center Channel speakers?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ส.ค. 2021
  • My review of the speakers discussed in this video can be found here:
    Kef R2c: www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loud...
    Kef R3: www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loud...
    If you are interested in buying either of these, please consider using my Amazon affiliate link as it earns me a small commission which helps me fund the channel.
    Kef R3: amzn.to/3At62Pp
    Kef R2c: amzn.to/2U5RIwy
    ____________________
    If you like what you see here and want to help support the cause you might be interested in joining my Patreon: / erinsaudiocorner
    Facebook Page for updates:
    / erinsaudiocorner
    All of my tests are conducted using KLIPPEL Hardware and Software. KLIPPEL is an innovative leader in providing unique test equipment for electro-acoustical transducers and audio systems. Founded in 1997 by Dr. Wolfgang Klippel, the novel techniques developed for control and measurement systems of loudspeakers and other transducers are the result of over 30 years of fundamental research. This provides more accurate physical models of loudspeakers, micro-speakers and headphones valid for both small and large amplitudes. The focus is on revealing the root causes of signal distortion and defects and giving practical indications for improvements in design and manufacturing of audio products. For information on KLIPPEL products, please visit their site below:
    www.klippel.de/company/about-u...
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @ErinsAudioCorner
    @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    If you are interested in buying either of these, please consider using my Amazon affiliate link as it earns me a small commission which helps me fund the channel.
    Kef R3: amzn.to/3At62Pp
    Kef R2c: amzn.to/2U5RIwy

  • @josegazal701
    @josegazal701 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, great video as usual!

  • @martifilipponi1024
    @martifilipponi1024 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just bought r11's a couple of weeks ago and I'm using a q100 as a center because I originally had a 6.1 setup using all q100s I've been thinking of buying the rc2 because the sound quality of the r11 is just so superior to the q100 that it sounds like a tin box.
    I wish I could use a phantom center and keep my surrounds going but there's no way to do that anymore as in two channel setup the center image is spot on

  • @keepingupwiththejones2933
    @keepingupwiththejones2933 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Yes , I love hearing Erin speak about what if scenarios.

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What if I won the lottery? Don't even get me started!!!! 😂

  • @peerguy
    @peerguy 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good answer. Thanks. I purchased R2C and 2 R3s for home theater and saw this video. Oops.. I would’ve gotten the R3 for center.. ugh!

  • @Psyphonyx_Life
    @Psyphonyx_Life 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Always wondered about this in many models.. This is great

  • @stevenswall
    @stevenswall 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    9:00 According to B&W, and Genelec if I recall correctly, as long as your distance from the wall to the speaker is the radius of the port, you're not restricting it in any meaningful way.
    So if you have a 3" diameter circular port, you'd need it to be 1.5" away from the wall.
    The area of a 3" port is 7.07" square.
    If we take the 9.425" diameter of the port and multiply it by the 1.5" wall distance we get about 14.14" square, so twice the area to vent into compared to the port exit, which is plenty to not effect it.

  • @zombielandiii2711
    @zombielandiii2711 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it better kef r100 ( or kef r50 ) than Klipsch RP 500m for Atmos and surrounds? I'm asking because I just bought a pair of Kef R3 for left and right mains. Any way thanks for the review.

  • @marcbittner
    @marcbittner 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome info here. Part of me really wants to replace my r2c with an r3 (i have r3's for my surrounds)....hard to justify the cost though, especially since the r3s aren't sold individually

  • @nezukokamado5888
    @nezukokamado5888 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, which LCR is better ? run 3 x Polk xt15 or 3 x Polk xt30 ? Pls help

  • @Alex-du2cx
    @Alex-du2cx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know much about kef r600c middle

  • @IrenESorius
    @IrenESorius 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Erin,, 👍‍‍😎👍‍‍!

  • @4khill462
    @4khill462 ปีที่แล้ว

    Have you done this test on ELAC Uni-Fi series? I'm using 2x CC-U5 centers vertically as L/R

  • @Canadian_Eh_I
    @Canadian_Eh_I 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    right on! This puts a big 'what if' to rest. Purposeful design is usually better than adhoc use cases.

  • @slyfoxx8540
    @slyfoxx8540 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you prefer the r3 over the elac unifi refrence considering the more wide sound stage of the uni?

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      A hybrid would be ideal. But I’d probably go with the Kef based on what I thought of them at the time.

    • @slyfoxx8540
      @slyfoxx8540 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErinsAudioCorner interesting, thanks.
      Just don't what to think of some opinions of it being a tad "boring".
      Does look badass though.

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I don’t know why anyone would say it’s boring unless they’re talking about bass and at that point, there aren’t many bookshelf speakers that don’t require a subwoofer.

    • @slyfoxx8540
      @slyfoxx8540 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErinsAudioCorner true. Think I'll have to try for a demo to see for myself.

  • @BenjiGator23
    @BenjiGator23 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great videos! Based on what you’ve seen from the data and heard, would you EQ the R3 and R2C (ex. Audyssey) through the entire range (20Hz - 20KHz) or would you limit the EQ up to a certain point (say 300Hz)?

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I would only eq for the speaker of either the R3 and R2c in a couple spots. For example, the R2c needed cutting around 8kHz. I wouldn’t let full-blown room correction run any higher than maybe 400/500Hz (depending on your room size).

    • @marcbittner
      @marcbittner 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErinsAudioCorner Random: is there a way to isolate the transition frequency of a room based on measurements? I roll my own room correction using eq and published spinnorama data as target curves, but my room has goofy dimensions, so i struggle to determine where to bound the correction.

  • @joppepeelen
    @joppepeelen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    l just discovered this channel (due to a friend ), a question. how did you buy a 50.000 klippel system ? of do i miss something. i would love to see a planar magnetic in the measurements if you can magnepan, or apogee, or something i make ;) i know they wont measure all that glorious (seen some in the past of the LRS and klippel. although its the most populair maggie :). but i would be interested anyhow :) but im not sure witch klippel system you bought since some planars.. are well hugh. :) anyhow interesting stuff !

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The Klippel Near Field Scanner is the system I use to measure loudspeakers.
      I also use other Klippel products to measure subwoofers and raw drive units.

  • @abdo-dr1tu
    @abdo-dr1tu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What really surprised me in the R2C is how the sensitivity is not increased at all with the additional woofers. Is the setup midrange limited?

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most certainly. The raw driver is likely mid-80’s. I tested the R500 raw driver hears back and that’s what I found.

    • @ACM1000000PT
      @ACM1000000PT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      the r2c use 5.25'' x2 and have the same sensitivity as R3 6.5'' woofer..., it does

  • @mikedinno8413
    @mikedinno8413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So does a bookshelf placed vertically perform better than a typical center channel?

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Generally speaking, yes. That is why it is often recommended to use the same speaker for your center as you use for your mains.

    • @mikedinno8413
      @mikedinno8413 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ErinsAudioCorner Audioholics did an article stating that but then Gene wrote another one to counter it saying that an MTM is better than a bookshelf so the data is all over the place.

  • @therianstrauss
    @therianstrauss 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Should be selling these in a 3 pack

  • @streamcnoremorse3323
    @streamcnoremorse3323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is R3 good for classic heavy like Iron Maiden? 2000 recordings with good quality

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sure. Just don’t expect chest pounding bass out of it. Get a subwoofer for that.

    • @streamcnoremorse3323
      @streamcnoremorse3323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErinsAudioCorner So thank you. I do not need deep bass. But bass is important. I need good quality.

    • @streamcnoremorse3323
      @streamcnoremorse3323 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErinsAudioCorner any alternatives to R3? Eve SC207?

  • @davidfuller581
    @davidfuller581 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Seems like the R3 is probably the better choice overall, at least for L/R, but I suppose due to the coaxial design they could probably comfortably be turned on their sides for a center channel.
    What I don't understand, though, is _why KEF designs in that LF down-tilt._ It doesn't make any sense to me, and just makes the speakers harder to drive in the low end than strictly necessary.

  • @pyrocrew17
    @pyrocrew17 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Goonies 👍👍

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Heeey you guys!

    • @pyrocrew17
      @pyrocrew17 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ErinsAudioCorner 🤙🤙 stay to the right lol ha ha

  • @werissonws
    @werissonws 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I always have the impression that the old r900/r700/500 are still better than the q950/750/550. I can not accept with the 2 fake subwoofer.

    • @4khill462
      @4khill462 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They're not fake subwoofers, they're woofers that are dedicated to sub-400 freqs. Makes it easier/cleaner for woofer and midrange

  • @dontpokethebear3893
    @dontpokethebear3893 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    R2c seems to be almost 2 inches shorter than the R3 on its side. Frankly I don’t think I can find anything that performs anything even remotely close to the R2c that can be less than 7 inches thin.

    • @TH-lo8mq
      @TH-lo8mq ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's true. There is no other 3 way this small that I am aware of because they are not coaxial. They have to offset the midrange and tweeter which adds to the height.

  • @milan616
    @milan616 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Erin, I know you said you want to use the Klippel more so ... how much of a pain in the ass would it be to do all your measurements of ported speakers sealed up as well? 😅 Think it would be interesting reading/viewing like with the Neumi's

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I do that for some already. Usually if the results or my listening tests indicate the port being a problem.

  • @abdo-dr1tu
    @abdo-dr1tu 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The KEF R3 showed deficiencies in the data?
    Are we looking at the same data here?

  • @richm4402
    @richm4402 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You mentioned the R2C being a sealed box? It’s actually ported

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, it’s not. The R2c is a sealed enclosure. Look at the photos on my website.
      www.erinsaudiocorner.com/loudspeakers/kef_r2c/

    • @richm4402
      @richm4402 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ErinsAudioCorner apologies Erin ! I was on the Kef site looking at this speaker today and they make reference to the R series’s using their ‘ flex port’ technology. I should of looked at the specs that clearly state the R2C is a sealed design. Thanks for the review!

    • @ErinsAudioCorner
      @ErinsAudioCorner  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No worries. It happens.

  • @joelopez7459
    @joelopez7459 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who is going to let you buy a single speaker tho? This aint CSS audio