Me agrada tu dedicación y empeño al deck lunalight sigue asi ( no importa si no traduces el comentario, con que se entienda que es de apoyir esta bien XD)
Also, I actually think babel is a fine side deck card for the mirror. It sounds weird, but in a back and forth with dingirsu effects, being ae to revive your dingirsu on your opponents turn will help you win those exchanges since youll be be able to summon yours twice as often
I like that reasoning! Babel has definitely been a card I've been wavering on, but yeah there are definitely matchups and scenarios where it's very important to have, and others where it's entirely dead. You bring up an interesting proposal though, might have to test it out! :)
Before I ask my question, I want to thank you for making these videos about Lunalight. Your knowledge of the deck has really helped me and probably everyone who watches your videos. I was able to secure a Top 8 with the deck at regionals before the hit to Mermaid. Your videos have been so useful! With that said, with the release of CHIM, do you think the release of I:P will change the design of the deck? Instead of relying on Gryphon/Order going first, would it be better to go I:P Masq with Galatea, Babel, Dweller, and a Ding in grave with Cymbal?
Hey, sorry for responding to this late! Sometimes TH-cam notifications are really weird, so I have to periodically check up on the videos myself to see new comments at times haha. Also, congrats on your regional top! I do believe I:P Masquerena will be a useful addition to the deck, but perhaps not as commonplace as with pure Orcust. The deck puts up a fair amount of interruption outside of the Orcust engine, so depending on the situation, it can be more valuable to protect your board with the standard Dingirsu + Crescendo with Galatea setup as opposed to trying to get the 2 disruptions out of Babel + I:P. That said, depending on the matchup and overall state of the meta it can certainly be more optimal, so it'll just depend on how the format shifts :)
Usually, I like sending climax witth curious and use galatea to set the babel in game 1. Unlike any other orcust variant, lunalight is the only one that can consistently get both the field spell and the trap without relying on hard drawing them. Post siding is when i run the relative floodgate. Ive actually seen people play solemn judgment as their target for game 1 though im not too keen on it.
I personally think that EEV can be such a blowout card that I'd prefer having it over the Babel in a lot of cases. Assuming I don't need to send an Orcust off Curious, I'd rather be able to have an option to drop a more impactful card. There are some cases though where if you wanna play around Super Poly, you can just end on Dingirsu with EEV, not summon the 2nd Galatea, and actually do put up the Babel so that's worth mentioning. Also, there was a point in time a while ago where I tested Solemn Judgment but I cut that pretty quickly haha :P
@@SirEmanon I had the same experience with judgment too xD. I feel like with maskarena now being an option getting babel might be too good. I guess you can call it my personality but i hate, mind the language, scummy floodgates unless theyre in my side >.>
I’ve been testing the deck myself, pretty much the same build except i was running grepher. I like 1 knightmare 2 harp 1 cymbal since you can normal harp if you need to. I might cut one of the harps for wand, but im not a huge fan of wand since its such a dead card when drawn and its kind of a win-more extender in my experience
Yeah, I've actually swapped the ratio for Orcusts like I mentioned in the video to the one you just described, for actually the same reason haha. I do like Wand in cases where you have to grind. It's bad to draw, but it allows you to play a lot more freely with the Orcusts to be able to make larger pushes at pretty much all stages in the game.
I've seen that build and it's pretty neat. But skipping your MP1 of your next turn is huge. It seems counter intuitive to me because that board isn't too hard to get through, especially since the monsters being summoned are in DEF which is lower than their ATK. At least in those monsters in particular. So if your opponent picks apart your board you have 0 chance of OTKing them next turn (which is the point of Lunalights.) So although Dugares with Curious can enable some nice locks, skipping your MP1 is too detrimental to a deck that wants to kill your opponent as quick as possible. Thats just my 2¢ :)
I agree with many of the points brought up by Isaac, and that's the reason I ultimately don't think I'll be running those cards. To add to some of the issues mentioned, I think it's difficult to gauge which monster to summon blind game 1 depending on the matchup unless you have a strong meta call. For instance, Spell Canceller isn't ideal vs. decks like Salamangreat and Thunder which can push past it with relative ease, and Kristya is rather lackluster against Sky Striker and other control decks like True Draco and Subterror. Overall, I think it's a simple win condition that's easy to achieve, which is always appreciated, but I don't think a single floodgate is universally applicable enough to justify maining at the moment. :)
Woul you consider playing the masquerena-unicorn package. I think its gonna be a must of in any orcust deck. Maybe cut the daruma doll and the evilswarm?
I answered this in a previous comment, so I'll summarize my answer here: I'd have to restructure my combos in order to accommodate it, and I'm not sure that Unicorn is a better disruption that just summoning more Rank 4's, but it's definitely a consideration for sure given its advantageous typing and potential as a disruptor :)
Great deck profile! Thanks so much as always for the awesome content. Although one question I have is how you do the gryphon combo to set the eradicator since it needs to be linked to something to activate the setting from graveyard effect...
Heeeeey what are you actually think about Daigusto Emeral or Dugares? Both could be really good R4nk to grind like Daigusto Emeral recicle your engine again and dugares discard a Knightmare if you open with it and you draw 2 cards which could be more Extender. But maybe there are Space issue :D. But Idk how consistent you make the EEV Play since you have to Go mostly into curious to send the Orcust engine. Also, think about Dugares, in if your Armageddon gets ashed and you have only one Level 4 Extender like Mothman you could try to play the game.
Hey! I'm not too keen on Dugares, because in order to adequately include it into your combos safely, you have to summon Azathot, Force Strix, and Dugares which is 3 Rank 4's prior to even going into your main plays, which I feel is very difficult to achieve in most hands. I don't think that the situations of drawing specifically Armageddon Knight + Danger warrant its inclusion either; I'd just try to play out the hands as best as possible. As for Emeral, I really do like the card a lot and I would love to include it, but it does come down to the space issue sadly :(
Can you show some test hands and end boards? One this that worries me with EEV is that if the opponent is maining super poly it can be a complete blow out.
I'm having a little trouble figuring out how the combos works. With chick + tiger + jackalope (which give you a monster in grave for nyarla to swap materials and an extender) I can get as far as gryphon with the virus set as well as a lunalight monster on the board . But since you're sending the virus with curious how are you getting to the orcusts?
EEV isn't as consistent, so I'd always prioritize the Orucsts first. This leaves the inclusion of EEV of course up to debate, so you can easily drop it if you don't find the Gryphon combo to be consistent enough or worthwhile. However, if you open either Harp or Knightmare you can end up setting both plays up which happens a fair bit, accounting for Danger draws and such. Imma make another combo video pretty soon, but yeah those are my preliminary thoughts :)
I'm not super surprised by his win; he's an extremely good player and he even mentioned recently that he felt Lunalight Orcust was the best deck (which prompted me to pick the deck back up and give it a try). As far as potential banlist implications a few months later, it'll just depend on how consistently the deck performs in the upcoming months. Congrats to him! :)
It's more of a higher variance combo (at least if you still want to incorporate the Orcusts into the combo string), but I'll talk more about it in an upcoming combo video; there's a lot to unpack and discuss! :)
I think : 1) Number 60 is too good 2) Brotherhood is important VS Thunder today 3) I Will try to play 3x Malicious, 2 free summon and it's à dark / warrior, PERFECT for Curious What do you think ?
I think Number 60 is great in theory, but it just doesn't work out in practice nearly as much as I'd hope. As a combo piece, it's hard to add it alongside Azathot and Force Strix, as that requires 3 Rank 4's prior to summoning anything even remotely defensive (like Dweller, Nightmare, Tornado, etc.), and as an extender in builds that turbo out Kristya and Spell Canceller, I just find that the board isn't powerful enough, and you relinquish your OTK potential while not benig able to cover the entire field with a blind selection of one of those floodgate monsters. Tiger King is really good and is one of the spots I'm trying to fit in the deck for sure. I really do like the card a lot. The good thing with Orcust cards is that those cards are inherently strong ver Thunder anyway, so as long as you can access the engine, you can definitely out their boards a lot of the time. The problem I have with Malicious is getting it to the grave consistently. You have stuff like Armageddon Knight and Grepher, but you relinquish the chance of those cards being used to send Lunalights if you don't open them, or bulking on normal summons. And relying on Dangers isn't a strategy that I'm a fan of since it introduces more variance. Overall though, I do like the concept of adding more extenders, just gotta find the right ones :)
@@SirEmanon Hey, i try to play Malicious today I found a 6 rank XYZ (Photon strike Bounzer) for Malicious + Lunalight Wolf :p not bad at all My board at the end of my turn : Dingirsu, Galatea, Crescendo, Dweller, Strike Bounzer Also, i can use another XYZ (Béatrice) : Quick effet, you can send 1 card of your deck to GY. You play Babel, so Béatrice->Orcust Knightmare-> Harp Horror, then Longirsu effect :p Also, i can play B. A farfa for banish 1 monster of my opponen't side I continue to try, it's not the best deck profile but i want to search a New combo x) Sorry for my bad english lol
@@Karismatik96 No problem! I can understand your English very well :) Your ideas are really cool and innovative, I really do like seeing new stuff so keep at it! I personally love BA's so Beatrice and Farfa are really cool tech choices :)
Cutting Gryphon is definitely a valid option. I don't think it's needed either, but I like having the flexibility of being able to drop a blowout card and win the game vs a lot of matchups (EEV). As for Allure, I've never liked the card in this deck because I find the resources to be too important to banish, but I understand others do like the consistency it provides, so that's also a fair inclusion :)
I like other cards more than Shade Brigandine (like Destrudo) since Brigandine can be awkward with Dangers. That said, it's still a great choice since it's a warrior for Curious and can make Rank 4's, so definitely feel free to test it if you want more possible extenders :)
I know Jesse Kotton played it in his list at the UDS. I think it's an alright card to help unbrick, but I think it has diminishing value the higher you go past 40 cards in the main deck, and there's nothing I feel worth cutting currently in order to keep it close to 40 with triple Into the Void at the moment. But I wouldn't fault anyone for playing the card, since consistency can be an issue sometimes :)
@@caingaytan7043 It's ok TBH. It's a good card because in it's uniqueness to let you link summon on your opponent's turn. It's usefulness really depends on your circumstance. If your hand has say a Danger monster, you can make a Unicorn and spin a card by discarding the danger monster on your opponents turn and not really loose out on card advantage. It can also make Avramax indestructible by card effects adding to it's already awesome protection from targeting and battle. So there is that... I think it's wise to pick up a few copies when the price settles because it's only a matter of time before Konami comes out with a generic link that does some ridiculous effect on summon (i know we have Saryuja but there's no point in making it on your opponents turn.) For now it's just an ok card. :)
I think the card has a lot of potential, but as you mentioned, the extra deck is extremely tight. It's cool because being a DARK Cyberse helps it make Curious, which can definitely help with combo potential in certain hands. If I wanted to hone in on using it specifically as part of the end board, I'd have to reevaluate and restructure some of my current combo lines. Often times, I end up using either the stray Curious or Barricadeborg Blocker (depending on hand) in order to go into the Orcust combo currently, so I'd have to consider ways to both perform the Orcust combo and leave enough materials to make I:P worthwhile. There's also the question of what targets are worth summoning on the opponent's turn. Of course, Unicorn/Phoenix and Topologic Bomber Dragon/Apollousa come to mind, but I'm not sure any of those targets are quite good enough to warrant its inclusion just yet, but time will tell :)
I'm wavering towards the Oonalight build being good for regional play, but the course of a long tournament like a YCS worries me a bit. The more I play with that build, the more issues I run into with consistency, and I just feel like Orcusts, while being less powerful as far as end boards, just offer a lot more native consistency overall. :)
I used to run Grepher in my very old builds on the channel, but I've dropped it simply to avoid situations where I bulked on normal summons, and I think that if you don't have a specific hand to be able to play in cases where you get hand trapped (i.e. pitching an Orcust, or pitching Chick with Tiger in hand), it's a lot riskier than Armageddon Knight. Those are the reasons why I dropped it, but I still do like the card in principle due to being able to be another starter and offering more type diversity for Curious, so feel free to test it if you'd like! :)
Yep, the core list I feel is pretty straightforward, it just depends on the ratios for certain starters as well as the Orcust engine, and I think that comes down to further testing and preference :)
Ed's my hero ;) (In all seriousness though, I've been testing all sorts of Lunalight builds since it's my favorite archetype, and this build was definitely on the list to be tested eventually! :))
You play 2-3 Time Thief Winder with any combination of Regulator and Bezel Ship. They act as extenders for the most part and being dark machines plays nice with Orcust.
I typically go for 3 Winder and 1 Bezel Ship. The way I view Winder is a Danger without variance, meaning that you're guaranteed the DARK Psychic on board to help make Curious (and Bezel is a Machine), as well as further extenders that contribute a lot to the combos without sacrificing a lot of possible hand quality in the process. :)
@@rickysingh7896 I wouldn't say so. The entire goal is to summon Curious, and the Lunalight cards alone don't get there even with Azathot, so whether it's through a Danger or another extender like Time Thieves, it really helps allow you to start your bigger plays :)
@@SirEmanon Ah ok hehe. What building are you using on dueling? Is this one? After many years, i will play with The lunalights again. I building The deck with orcusts now.
Hey dude, love the enthusiasm, but I'm working on it. I'm the type of player who's methodical and meticulous, and I'd prefer to show you guys the absolute perfect combos instead of rushing things out :)
![[Part 1] ทารกน้อยถูกทิ้ง👶 หญิงชราเก็บขวดขายเลี้ยงดูเขาจนโต #โลกการละคร](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nPTDvFCExks/mqdefault.jpg)
Really interested in seeing lunalight time thief, and I'd love to see a vid on that :)
I would really love to see the test hand video, I really enjoy hearing your thoughts on your deck
Awesome, will do! :)
Personally, I could also use some help with knowing what to side out with certain match ups.
Will definitely be doing an in-depth side guide as the format develops further! :)
Love to see some combos my dude!
Fantastic, it'll definitely be coming sometime later this week! :)
Me agrada tu dedicación y empeño al deck lunalight sigue asi ( no importa si no traduces el comentario, con que se entienda que es de apoyir esta bien XD)
Thank you for this love your content and how knowledgeable you are of the deck and the game In general
Thanks! Glad you enjoy and appreciate the content :)
That Barricadeborg tech looks so cool. I'd love to see some combos/testhands/duels. I'm really curious how do you make your Gryphon play.
Yep, I'll be following up with the combos/test hands pretty soon! :)
Also, I actually think babel is a fine side deck card for the mirror. It sounds weird, but in a back and forth with dingirsu effects, being ae to revive your dingirsu on your opponents turn will help you win those exchanges since youll be be able to summon yours twice as often
I like that reasoning! Babel has definitely been a card I've been wavering on, but yeah there are definitely matchups and scenarios where it's very important to have, and others where it's entirely dead. You bring up an interesting proposal though, might have to test it out! :)
Combo Tutorial with this Deck would be amazing
Yes. Combo tutorial, test hands, etc.
Convince me I can play this over mekk knights xD
Combos please man! Loving your Lunalight vids. Time thief also sounds cool!
Before I ask my question, I want to thank you for making these videos about Lunalight. Your knowledge of the deck has really helped me and probably everyone who watches your videos. I was able to secure a Top 8 with the deck at regionals before the hit to Mermaid. Your videos have been so useful!
With that said, with the release of CHIM, do you think the release of I:P will change the design of the deck? Instead of relying on Gryphon/Order going first, would it be better to go I:P Masq with Galatea, Babel, Dweller, and a Ding in grave with Cymbal?
Hey, sorry for responding to this late! Sometimes TH-cam notifications are really weird, so I have to periodically check up on the videos myself to see new comments at times haha. Also, congrats on your regional top!
I do believe I:P Masquerena will be a useful addition to the deck, but perhaps not as commonplace as with pure Orcust. The deck puts up a fair amount of interruption outside of the Orcust engine, so depending on the situation, it can be more valuable to protect your board with the standard Dingirsu + Crescendo with Galatea setup as opposed to trying to get the 2 disruptions out of Babel + I:P. That said, depending on the matchup and overall state of the meta it can certainly be more optimal, so it'll just depend on how the format shifts :)
Test hands would be super nice for sure :)
Usually, I like sending climax witth curious and use galatea to set the babel in game 1. Unlike any other orcust variant, lunalight is the only one that can consistently get both the field spell and the trap without relying on hard drawing them. Post siding is when i run the relative floodgate. Ive actually seen people play solemn judgment as their target for game 1 though im not too keen on it.
I personally think that EEV can be such a blowout card that I'd prefer having it over the Babel in a lot of cases. Assuming I don't need to send an Orcust off Curious, I'd rather be able to have an option to drop a more impactful card. There are some cases though where if you wanna play around Super Poly, you can just end on Dingirsu with EEV, not summon the 2nd Galatea, and actually do put up the Babel so that's worth mentioning. Also, there was a point in time a while ago where I tested Solemn Judgment but I cut that pretty quickly haha :P
@@SirEmanon I had the same experience with judgment too xD. I feel like with maskarena now being an option getting babel might be too good. I guess you can call it my personality but i hate, mind the language, scummy floodgates unless theyre in my side >.>
Let's see some advanced combo!!
I’ve been testing the deck myself, pretty much the same build except i was running grepher. I like 1 knightmare 2 harp 1 cymbal since you can normal harp if you need to. I might cut one of the harps for wand, but im not a huge fan of wand since its such a dead card when drawn and its kind of a win-more extender in my experience
Yeah, I've actually swapped the ratio for Orcusts like I mentioned in the video to the one you just described, for actually the same reason haha. I do like Wand in cases where you have to grind. It's bad to draw, but it allows you to play a lot more freely with the Orcusts to be able to make larger pushes at pretty much all stages in the game.
combo video asap! and the side deck strategy!
What are your thoughts on the special summoning of Jinzo, Archlord Kristia or spell cancler using Number 60?
I've seen that build and it's pretty neat. But skipping your MP1 of your next turn is huge. It seems counter intuitive to me because that board isn't too hard to get through, especially since the monsters being summoned are in DEF which is lower than their ATK. At least in those monsters in particular. So if your opponent picks apart your board you have 0 chance of OTKing them next turn (which is the point of Lunalights.) So although Dugares with Curious can enable some nice locks, skipping your MP1 is too detrimental to a deck that wants to kill your opponent as quick as possible. Thats just my 2¢ :)
I agree with many of the points brought up by Isaac, and that's the reason I ultimately don't think I'll be running those cards. To add to some of the issues mentioned, I think it's difficult to gauge which monster to summon blind game 1 depending on the matchup unless you have a strong meta call. For instance, Spell Canceller isn't ideal vs. decks like Salamangreat and Thunder which can push past it with relative ease, and Kristya is rather lackluster against Sky Striker and other control decks like True Draco and Subterror. Overall, I think it's a simple win condition that's easy to achieve, which is always appreciated, but I don't think a single floodgate is universally applicable enough to justify maining at the moment. :)
Thank you very much, I can skip the test phase at ye old locals
Test hand video would be great :)
Woul you consider playing the masquerena-unicorn package. I think its gonna be a must of in any orcust deck. Maybe cut the daruma doll and the evilswarm?
I answered this in a previous comment, so I'll summarize my answer here: I'd have to restructure my combos in order to accommodate it, and I'm not sure that Unicorn is a better disruption that just summoning more Rank 4's, but it's definitely a consideration for sure given its advantageous typing and potential as a disruptor :)
Do you think lunalights are getting hit on the upcoming banlist?
Great deck profile! Thanks so much as always for the awesome content. Although one question I have is how you do the gryphon combo to set the eradicator since it needs to be linked to something to activate the setting from graveyard effect...
Thanks! I think a lot of people have inquiries about certain aspects of the deck, so I'll be sure to cover that with a combo video later this week :)
Heeeeey what are you actually think about Daigusto Emeral or Dugares? Both could be really good R4nk to grind like Daigusto Emeral recicle your engine again and dugares discard a Knightmare if you open with it and you draw 2 cards which could be more Extender. But maybe there are Space issue :D. But Idk how consistent you make the EEV Play since you have to Go mostly into curious to send the Orcust engine. Also, think about Dugares, in if your Armageddon gets ashed and you have only one Level 4 Extender like Mothman you could try to play the game.
Hey! I'm not too keen on Dugares, because in order to adequately include it into your combos safely, you have to summon Azathot, Force Strix, and Dugares which is 3 Rank 4's prior to even going into your main plays, which I feel is very difficult to achieve in most hands. I don't think that the situations of drawing specifically Armageddon Knight + Danger warrant its inclusion either; I'd just try to play out the hands as best as possible. As for Emeral, I really do like the card a lot and I would love to include it, but it does come down to the space issue sadly :(
what do you think about running utopia double in this deck?
+ 1 vote for combo tutorial
Can you show some test hands and end boards? One this that worries me with EEV is that if the opponent is maining super poly it can be a complete blow out.
Yep, will definitely get around to it :)
Could you make a video explaining the combos pls?
Yep, will make a video soon!
I'm having a little trouble figuring out how the combos works. With chick + tiger + jackalope (which give you a monster in grave for nyarla to swap materials and an extender) I can get as far as gryphon with the virus set as well as a lunalight monster on the board . But since you're sending the virus with curious how are you getting to the orcusts?
EEV isn't as consistent, so I'd always prioritize the Orucsts first. This leaves the inclusion of EEV of course up to debate, so you can easily drop it if you don't find the Gryphon combo to be consistent enough or worthwhile. However, if you open either Harp or Knightmare you can end up setting both plays up which happens a fair bit, accounting for Danger draws and such. Imma make another combo video pretty soon, but yeah those are my preliminary thoughts :)
please, make a video showing us some combos!!!
Thoughts on Jesse Kotton just winning the Panama UDS with this deck?
I'm not super surprised by his win; he's an extremely good player and he even mentioned recently that he felt Lunalight Orcust was the best deck (which prompted me to pick the deck back up and give it a try). As far as potential banlist implications a few months later, it'll just depend on how consistently the deck performs in the upcoming months. Congrats to him! :)
What’s the Knightmare Gryphon and Eradicator combo?
It's more of a higher variance combo (at least if you still want to incorporate the Orcusts into the combo string), but I'll talk more about it in an upcoming combo video; there's a lot to unpack and discuss! :)
I think :
1) Number 60 is too good
2) Brotherhood is important VS Thunder today
3) I Will try to play 3x Malicious, 2 free summon and it's à dark / warrior, PERFECT for Curious
What do you think ?
I think Number 60 is great in theory, but it just doesn't work out in practice nearly as much as I'd hope. As a combo piece, it's hard to add it alongside Azathot and Force Strix, as that requires 3 Rank 4's prior to summoning anything even remotely defensive (like Dweller, Nightmare, Tornado, etc.), and as an extender in builds that turbo out Kristya and Spell Canceller, I just find that the board isn't powerful enough, and you relinquish your OTK potential while not benig able to cover the entire field with a blind selection of one of those floodgate monsters.
Tiger King is really good and is one of the spots I'm trying to fit in the deck for sure. I really do like the card a lot. The good thing with Orcust cards is that those cards are inherently strong ver Thunder anyway, so as long as you can access the engine, you can definitely out their boards a lot of the time.
The problem I have with Malicious is getting it to the grave consistently. You have stuff like Armageddon Knight and Grepher, but you relinquish the chance of those cards being used to send Lunalights if you don't open them, or bulking on normal summons. And relying on Dangers isn't a strategy that I'm a fan of since it introduces more variance. Overall though, I do like the concept of adding more extenders, just gotta find the right ones :)
@@SirEmanon Thank you for your answer 😀
@@SirEmanon Hey, i try to play Malicious today
I found a 6 rank XYZ (Photon strike Bounzer) for Malicious + Lunalight Wolf :p not bad at all
My board at the end of my turn :
Dingirsu, Galatea, Crescendo, Dweller, Strike Bounzer
Also, i can use another XYZ (Béatrice) : Quick effet, you can send 1 card of your deck to GY. You play Babel, so Béatrice->Orcust Knightmare-> Harp Horror, then Longirsu effect :p
Also, i can play B. A farfa for banish 1 monster of my opponen't side
I continue to try, it's not the best deck profile but i want to search a New combo x)
Sorry for my bad english lol
@@Karismatik96 No problem! I can understand your English very well :) Your ideas are really cool and innovative, I really do like seeing new stuff so keep at it! I personally love BA's so Beatrice and Farfa are really cool tech choices :)
i am Running triple allure of Darkness, i Think its worth considering and i also cut the gryphon, i Think its not necessary anymore ^^
Cutting Gryphon is definitely a valid option. I don't think it's needed either, but I like having the flexibility of being able to drop a blowout card and win the game vs a lot of matchups (EEV). As for Allure, I've never liked the card in this deck because I find the resources to be too important to banish, but I understand others do like the consistency it provides, so that's also a fair inclusion :)
@@SirEmanon Thanks for your Reasoning :)
What about phantom knight trap that becomes Level 4? @sir emanon
I like other cards more than Shade Brigandine (like Destrudo) since Brigandine can be awkward with Dangers. That said, it's still a great choice since it's a warrior for Curious and can make Rank 4's, so definitely feel free to test it if you want more possible extenders :)
Combo video please.
Have you ever considered into the void?
I know Jesse Kotton played it in his list at the UDS. I think it's an alright card to help unbrick, but I think it has diminishing value the higher you go past 40 cards in the main deck, and there's nothing I feel worth cutting currently in order to keep it close to 40 with triple Into the Void at the moment. But I wouldn't fault anyone for playing the card, since consistency can be an issue sometimes :)
Does your this build change when I:p is released ? Cause extra is tight
MKE Kagari i agree. seems like a great card to change the extra deck around.
@@caingaytan7043 It's ok TBH. It's a good card because in it's uniqueness to let you link summon on your opponent's turn. It's usefulness really depends on your circumstance. If your hand has say a Danger monster, you can make a Unicorn and spin a card by discarding the danger monster on your opponents turn and not really loose out on card advantage. It can also make Avramax indestructible by card effects adding to it's already awesome protection from targeting and battle. So there is that... I think it's wise to pick up a few copies when the price settles because it's only a matter of time before Konami comes out with a generic link that does some ridiculous effect on summon (i know we have Saryuja but there's no point in making it on your opponents turn.) For now it's just an ok card. :)
I think the card has a lot of potential, but as you mentioned, the extra deck is extremely tight. It's cool because being a DARK Cyberse helps it make Curious, which can definitely help with combo potential in certain hands. If I wanted to hone in on using it specifically as part of the end board, I'd have to reevaluate and restructure some of my current combo lines. Often times, I end up using either the stray Curious or Barricadeborg Blocker (depending on hand) in order to go into the Orcust combo currently, so I'd have to consider ways to both perform the Orcust combo and leave enough materials to make I:P worthwhile. There's also the question of what targets are worth summoning on the opponent's turn. Of course, Unicorn/Phoenix and Topologic Bomber Dragon/Apollousa come to mind, but I'm not sure any of those targets are quite good enough to warrant its inclusion just yet, but time will tell :)
Sir Emanon ❤️
Some of the plays with her and Babel are just nice tho
Does this mean that you don't find your Oonalight build the most optimal? I am uncertain on what to play for YCS London.
I'm wavering towards the Oonalight build being good for regional play, but the course of a long tournament like a YCS worries me a bit. The more I play with that build, the more issues I run into with consistency, and I just feel like Orcusts, while being less powerful as far as end boards, just offer a lot more native consistency overall. :)
Have you considered Dark Grepher?
I used to run Grepher in my very old builds on the channel, but I've dropped it simply to avoid situations where I bulked on normal summons, and I think that if you don't have a specific hand to be able to play in cases where you get hand trapped (i.e. pitching an Orcust, or pitching Chick with Tiger in hand), it's a lot riskier than Armageddon Knight. Those are the reasons why I dropped it, but I still do like the card in principle due to being able to be another starter and offering more type diversity for Curious, so feel free to test it if you'd like! :)
combo!!!!!! video!!!!!
Coming soon! Been taking a small break but it'll be up over the weekend :)
I run a really similar list but I have grepher rota and only one moth man and 2 harp 1 skeletons 1 knightmare
Yep, the core list I feel is pretty straightforward, it just depends on the ratios for certain starters as well as the Orcust engine, and I think that comes down to further testing and preference :)
i see somebody’s been talking to ed!
Ed's my hero ;)
(In all seriousness though, I've been testing all sorts of Lunalight builds since it's my favorite archetype, and this build was definitely on the list to be tested eventually! :))
Video combo?
Same build here lol
What is the time thief engine you speak of?
You play 2-3 Time Thief Winder with any combination of Regulator and Bezel Ship. They act as extenders for the most part and being dark machines plays nice with Orcust.
I typically go for 3 Winder and 1 Bezel Ship. The way I view Winder is a Danger without variance, meaning that you're guaranteed the DARK Psychic on board to help make Curious (and Bezel is a Machine), as well as further extenders that contribute a lot to the combos without sacrificing a lot of possible hand quality in the process. :)
Sir Emanon oh very interesting it’s a bit of winmore if a rank 4 isn’t mad though isn’t it?
@@rickysingh7896 I wouldn't say so. The entire goal is to summon Curious, and the Lunalight cards alone don't get there even with Azathot, so whether it's through a Danger or another extender like Time Thieves, it really helps allow you to start your bigger plays :)
Combo Tutortial!
16 cards in Extra Deck?
8 Link monsters, 7 Xyz monsters :)
@@SirEmanon Ah ok hehe. What building are you using on dueling? Is this one? After many years, i will play with The lunalights again. I building The deck with orcusts now.
Just play black sheep to play around ash.
PLEASE!!!!! TEST HAND AND COMBOS !!!! SUSCRIBE ALREADY !!
Hey dude, love the enthusiasm, but I'm working on it. I'm the type of player who's methodical and meticulous, and I'd prefer to show you guys the absolute perfect combos instead of rushing things out :)