i was gonna make a comment like "thats it, imma rewrite (popular application written in rust) in c" but i literally cant find any popular application written in rust other than rust rewrites of popular c applications
tor was first written by darpa before they split it off into a nonprofit and nongovernment foundation thingy but still they gotta stay outta this unless their own workers been getting deanonymized by c bugs, and if they do, they should of said something about it
Honestly, modularity, proof of the actual safety benefit rather than just saying "it's rust", and multithreaded benefits should be at the top of the list of selling points. It might not sound like a huge difference, but there's a general rule of thumb you can reliably follow to determine when a program is actually worth the rewrite, in that if Rust is the top selling point, you *usually* want to avoid it, because that's a selling point presented by the rust cargo cult rather than professionals using rust.
> cargo cult error: no such command 'cult' Did you mean 'build'? View all installed commands with 'cargo --list' Find a package to install 'cult' with 'cargo search cargo-cult' > lol
@rabbitdrink Realer than I thought at first. Tried Arti in the meantime, and it doesn't do this thing called working. It doesn't tor yet. Like it'll proxy over tor, maybe, or maybe my system is just *overriding* my use of it, which after some testing it seems to be the case, but it's not usable as a tor relay or to get to onion sites yet as far as I can tell. For the time being it is cargo-cultware.
The thing about Rust is that there are a lot of money being injected in it. Years ago some persons were sure Python would be the most popular language, not because they were geniuses that knew the future, they just looked were the money was being thrown, and now the same phenomena is being repeated with Rust.
Im still waiting for a single case where rust is actually better for anything. Its worse for learning, its worse for usage, it is by no means faster and people's expertise is severely lacking. Every time I've seen people try to strawman c++ as an unsafe language they've been completely wrong on everything
@@AlbatrossCommando it doesn't prevent but its way more easier to manage and control the compiler actions in rust, like you know that there are no null pointers(maybe in unsafe code) this is just one example, rust is not the best, but better, blue hair cat ear cultists are annoying but its not like before wokism became a trend, people were all good and nice(if you are old enough to remember though)
From now on the C programming language is associated with Santa Cruz drinks at the health foods store. Thanks for burning that image into my mind. So whenever I'll see such drinks and Werther's original candies I'll think of the C programming language.
I was wondering what happened to this project. I checked up on it a month ago and it seemed just normally chugging along, no milestone development though. This vid came in right in time.
It's weird that a program written in C would be slower than a program written in Rust. From what I know, C is compiled directly into machine code binary, meaning the output is pretty much comprised of instructions running directly on the CPU. And yes, I know it's a little bit more complicated and convoluted than this (C isn't actually compiled directly into machine code, but it is compiled into Assembly, and from there machine code is created). It seems just weird that program written in something that is compiled into instructions specifically targetting the actual hardware, would run slower than program written in a higher programming language. That being said, I don't have any experiences with Rust, therefore I don't really know how Rust is actually compiled, if it's compiled into the same x86/arm binaries that C is compiled to as well. Maybe, just maybe, it actually is, and because Rust itself has native support for multithreading and better memory management, safe typing, etc., maybe it is actually faster.
In modern times both C and Rust are compiled using the LLVM framework. They are both converted into an LLVM IR, which is an intermediate assembly language for LLVM compiler that enables certain optimizations. And only then it's compiled down to the platform dependent assembly such as ARM or x86. Rust is not a higher level programming language than C, it's at the same level. Both C, C++, Rust, D, Zig, and maybe some other languages are at the same level. Rust has neither garbage collection nor is it interpreted. And since they are all converted into LLVM IR in the compiler at some point, all of these languages are interchangeable. It doesn't really matter all that much. The real speed of a program depends less on the programming language itself, and more on the skill of the programmer, how it is written, what coding constructs are used. A C code written by a low skills programmer will obviously run much slower than a C code written by a highly skilled programmer. The difference in Rust vs C though is that the Rust programming language has a much stricter rules. Many coding constructs that are permissible in C are not permissible in Rust. So Rust enforces what can be considered as good coding constructs. It is easy to write very shoddy or tacky code in C, code that has a lower performance or has bugs and vulnerabilities. It's harder to write such dubious coding constructs in Rust. The programming language itself has a stricter set of rules that are meant to enforce good coding constructs. This is why for a low or medium skills programmer, the Rust code that he writes will be more efficient than the C code that he writes, simply because the front-end compiler for the Rust programming language, the syntax checker and linter, will tell the programmer when he is doing something not right. For a highly skilled programmer, it's another matter. I do believe that he can write code in C that's both efficient, fast, and safe, and without bugs. But alas highly skilled C programmers are few and far between. Rust is just better for developing software for programmers who are not highly skilled, your average programmer, not some super developer.
@@TheRealGigachad1848Assembly? You're gonna leave performance on the table with the linker! Just git gud and learn to edit binary files directly with a hex editor :)
No. They are as competent as C programmers. It's just rust compiler spanks *them* when they showcase their incompetence, C starts shooting off feet left and right on the *user* side.
@@marcogenovesi8570 no it's just harder to make mistakes that the language specs is designed to catch, same with using static analysers on any other language (which you should always use)
Lol, everytime I hear something about rust, it's some people rewriting things and a bunch of lunatics in the comments fighting everyone that disagrees. Is there any (notable) new piece of software that was made with rust or is it just a toy language a bunch of fanboys try to push into every existing project?
Most of the real use cases are performant low level & embedded stuff with large organizations/projects, which you don't hear much about unless you follow the space. There you do get benefits from pushing standardization/safety. I do really like Typst though, I'm using it for college. It's a LaTeX alternative that feels more like markdown, much faster and easier. Aside from that maybe Bevy and Firefox.
The fundamental problem of rewriting a security critical piece of software is that you now have two different code bases to maintain... great. Let's see where this goes. I personally still doubt Rust will solve all issues here and even if it does I hope we at least receive a rewrite of its ugly syntax one day.
I think every dev should at least take a peak on every kind of language (functional, pop, high level, low level...) to expand its comprehension of CS, and rust definitely is a unique one, you won't loss your time.
We need a metric for security projects, SLOC written with cat ears on / all SLOC. This should indicate how closely aligned the project is with the interests of 3 letter agencies. Tsoding observed the innovation with rust was the moralization over memory safety. These people think they will fix the world. Maybe that naturally appeals to a different kind of person.
Wow, Arti sounds like a game changer for the Tor network! The idea of moving from C to Rust for better safety and performance is exactly what Tor needs.
You should do a video on 2fa requirements for open-source repositories. I got a notice for something, I believe it was git or hf, and that's a dark path forward.
This has to be so open source, I have a lot of hesitancy of switching protocols into rust for more than a handful of ideological reasons. I understand that c has not been the best for some of the businesses do in part 2 unsafe memory practices. We are in desperate need of better encryption and cryptography in some of these transaction protocols but and there is a massive however making sure that there is no glow Nigerian back doors is of some of the utmost importance in whether or not I am going to adopt this in future implementations. It's exciting to see that there are some new options coming to the market however this seems as if it is coming from a three-letter organization
Memory safety is very obviously a security enhancement. If rust is the language we should use to get memory safety, that's TBD. I think in general the US Gov has ways to deanonymize people without using memory overflow bugs so I think it mostly helps protect against other foreign actors.
A year from now youre gonna do another video on how Arti was in fact a gov project and we all fell from the sky when we found out. Happy new year, it is 2025, nothing is made to "just help" anymore.
Thanks for sharing! Could you help me with something unrelated: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (laundry net argue clarify fish exhibit try secret hair defy art canvas). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Dude I been watching ur videos for a year or two now and i have a serious question, can you recommend any path of least resistance to understanding this shit at your level? Like classes and courses to build off because I hate my job and i have been considering a change for awhile now but honestly i don't know where to start to know im learning the correct things and not wasting my time. Sorry I know thats a pretty nonspecific thing to ask but you seem to know your shit so its worth asking since I have been wanting to but keep forgetting. Thanks man and love the videos keep doing what you do your good at communicating this kind of information.
What a nice video!Btw , if i have 16GB ddr3 RAM and run win 10 as host os and wanted to run virtualisation and like two vms running linux does the amount of GB i give for each of the distro vary on the distro
@FrostByte-o7z yes as long as you retain your virtual machine files in an external storage what i do is transfer all of my files like documents, pictures, etc and put it on a second SSD and then note down the programs i have installed and install another distro off a USB
The biggest irony of Rust community that it's inherently rewrites everything without finishing it. Each time you see another rewrite, you know it's still continuous state.. There are no reasons this one rewrite will be different.
It's cool that Arti is an upgrade, but I am mostly ambivalent toward Rust with a slight bias against it. Zig is a much less disgusting language syntactically imo, and it doesn't have such a toxic cultmunity.
Rust is not a holy mary. It has the same memory leak issues if you do not follow their best practice. And I know quite a few programmers who dont care about standards. A rewrite is needed, but we will see memory leaks also in future.
Yes. Learning new languages regularly is a good thing. It teaches solving the same problems different ways and prevents from being insecure stupid PoS when you see that somebody is not using C.
And no amount of training wheels will make shitty programmer good. On the opposite, if you don't manage memory yourself chanses are height you don't have an idea how the memory works in your app. Source: i am a shitty programmer.
> "we need to make our code more secure"
> rewrites it using a chatbot
obviously the most secure code out there
All hail skynet
i'm confused, how does a chatbot writing code necessarily make it less secure?
@@crittercel Because chatbots can't think, and creating something secure tends to require thinking
TRACTOR is not a chatbot. Also, most uses of it don't include sending the code to a remote server. so yeah, it's still secure if done correctly.
@@blueyoshmin but couldn't it have secure code in its training dataset? and therefore able to create secure code?
i was gonna make a comment like "thats it, imma rewrite (popular application written in rust) in c" but i literally cant find any popular application written in rust other than rust rewrites of popular c applications
Maybe wezterm?
Bevy
Kaspa protocol
Rust rewrites no one uses
alacritty
If something exists, it'll be rewritten in Rust.
Rule 102 of the internet
by a transsexual
@Nick-bn6ch thank god its not 34
and under MIT license
and it glows
3/4 of Arti devs are on the list of GOV collaborators
the glow is brighter than the sun
tor was first written by darpa before they split it off into a nonprofit and nongovernment foundation thingy
but still they gotta stay outta this unless their own workers been getting deanonymized by c bugs, and if they do, they should of said something about it
Like that one Mokou meme says, "Three Letter Agent Glow So Bright"
cool down with antisemitic remarks
Have you forgotten that Tor was a project of the US Navy and thus government?
who tf turned the onion rusty
Was happening like 2-3 years ago
Some Rust fanatic probably
It's weird to me that there's adults that weren't around for Y2K.
Oh Jesus, thanks for the depression!
When you know there are porn stars born after 9/11
@@alst4817 I turn 22 this year. Was born in 2003.
@@personnelproton you’ve got it all ahead of you. Leans in: don’t fuck it up!
@@alst4817 I alreaady fucked up a lot and I am 23.
Help.
This glows especially if there's Rust in it 🦀
is something particularly unsafe about Rust?
@@neferiusnexus 3:30
whole channel glows, he just reads off of cards provided by CIA
Stop noticing things and just connect to the irsdotgov monero node to safely do your dark web transactions
comments disappearing
The thumbnail just is what the internet was made for. Glorious. I expect at lot from this project.
Honestly, modularity, proof of the actual safety benefit rather than just saying "it's rust", and multithreaded benefits should be at the top of the list of selling points.
It might not sound like a huge difference, but there's a general rule of thumb you can reliably follow to determine when a program is actually worth the rewrite, in that if Rust is the top selling point, you *usually* want to avoid it, because that's a selling point presented by the rust cargo cult rather than professionals using rust.
real
> cargo cult
error: no such command 'cult'
Did you mean 'build'?
View all installed commands with 'cargo --list'
Find a package to install 'cult' with 'cargo search cargo-cult'
>
lol
@rabbitdrink Realer than I thought at first.
Tried Arti in the meantime, and it doesn't do this thing called working.
It doesn't tor yet. Like it'll proxy over tor, maybe, or maybe my system is just *overriding* my use of it, which after some testing it seems to be the case, but it's not usable as a tor relay or to get to onion sites yet as far as I can tell.
For the time being it is cargo-cultware.
This is a very good point
Probably just going to wait for an audit before using...
The thing about Rust is that there are a lot of money being injected in it. Years ago some persons were sure Python would be the most popular language, not because they were geniuses that knew the future, they just looked were the money was being thrown, and now the same phenomena is being repeated with Rust.
the "irsdotgov" gave me a good chuckle
1:00 Most of these vulnerabilities are either logic errors or memory leaks which Rust doesn't prevent.
rust doesn't prevent memory leaks?
@@sempiternal_futilityNot directly, look up reference cycles.
@@sempiternal_futility No. Per their safety model memory leaks are safe because you can't access them after the pointer is released.
Im still waiting for a single case where rust is actually better for anything.
Its worse for learning, its worse for usage, it is by no means faster and people's expertise is severely lacking.
Every time I've seen people try to strawman c++ as an unsafe language they've been completely wrong on everything
@@AlbatrossCommando it doesn't prevent but its way more easier to manage and control the compiler actions in rust, like you know that there are no null pointers(maybe in unsafe code)
this is just one example, rust is not the best, but better, blue hair cat ear cultists are annoying but its not like before wokism became a trend, people were all good and nice(if you are old enough to remember though)
I eat onions with the skin and bite them like apples
same brotha
r/atetheonion
I eat raw onions with oatmeal. It keeps the tongue from burning.
Fuckers like you are why the NSA spy's on our shit
From now on the C programming language is associated with Santa Cruz drinks at the health foods store. Thanks for burning that image into my mind. So whenever I'll see such drinks and Werther's original candies I'll think of the C programming language.
You need an excuse to think about the C Programming Language?
I am so happy that I have stumbled upon this YT channel. Thank you sir for teaching us about this stuff.
arti, putting the rust into trustless
I was wondering what happened to this project. I checked up on it a month ago and it seemed just normally chugging along, no milestone development though. This vid came in right in time.
yeah im sure this won't become a yearoflinuxdesktop meme
This is super interesting to see as a new Rust developer. I'm focused more on game dev in Rust but this is super cool to see!
- every rust dev
i love it, I think there's a huge potential for linking arti and including it in apps to allow anonymous communication with other users
If this is a rewrite. Hopefully full UDP, websock, RPC is also included in the development task list.
HACKING TUTORIALS SAAAAAAAAR!!!!!
Do the needful first
It's weird that a program written in C would be slower than a program written in Rust. From what I know, C is compiled directly into machine code binary, meaning the output is pretty much comprised of instructions running directly on the CPU. And yes, I know it's a little bit more complicated and convoluted than this (C isn't actually compiled directly into machine code, but it is compiled into Assembly, and from there machine code is created). It seems just weird that program written in something that is compiled into instructions specifically targetting the actual hardware, would run slower than program written in a higher programming language. That being said, I don't have any experiences with Rust, therefore I don't really know how Rust is actually compiled, if it's compiled into the same x86/arm binaries that C is compiled to as well. Maybe, just maybe, it actually is, and because Rust itself has native support for multithreading and better memory management, safe typing, etc., maybe it is actually faster.
i know this took ages to type but i have nothing to say so im going to reply to boost it to other viewers
In modern times both C and Rust are compiled using the LLVM framework. They are both converted into an LLVM IR, which is an intermediate assembly language for LLVM compiler that enables certain optimizations. And only then it's compiled down to the platform dependent assembly such as ARM or x86. Rust is not a higher level programming language than C, it's at the same level. Both C, C++, Rust, D, Zig, and maybe some other languages are at the same level. Rust has neither garbage collection nor is it interpreted. And since they are all converted into LLVM IR in the compiler at some point, all of these languages are interchangeable. It doesn't really matter all that much. The real speed of a program depends less on the programming language itself, and more on the skill of the programmer, how it is written, what coding constructs are used. A C code written by a low skills programmer will obviously run much slower than a C code written by a highly skilled programmer. The difference in Rust vs C though is that the Rust programming language has a much stricter rules. Many coding constructs that are permissible in C are not permissible in Rust. So Rust enforces what can be considered as good coding constructs. It is easy to write very shoddy or tacky code in C, code that has a lower performance or has bugs and vulnerabilities. It's harder to write such dubious coding constructs in Rust. The programming language itself has a stricter set of rules that are meant to enforce good coding constructs. This is why for a low or medium skills programmer, the Rust code that he writes will be more efficient than the C code that he writes, simply because the front-end compiler for the Rust programming language, the syntax checker and linter, will tell the programmer when he is doing something not right. For a highly skilled programmer, it's another matter. I do believe that he can write code in C that's both efficient, fast, and safe, and without bugs. But alas highly skilled C programmers are few and far between. Rust is just better for developing software for programmers who are not highly skilled, your average programmer, not some super developer.
You can write slow code in any language.
@@systemloc Yeah, I guess you can. Ever heard of Bogo Sort? :D
@@konstantinrebrov675 does gcc also compile things to llvm? i thought only clang compiled c binaries to llvm
dang im old, I like Werther's originals. Not prune juice though
Greetings from Germany ❤ Love your Videos
Hallo. Bin auch aus Deutschland.
Look at him loving a fellow Turk
This seems interesting, I feel like programs like these should be written in Rust
I feel like NOTHING should be written in this terrible language. Just get good.
@@CrystalStarscape Just write everything in Assembly.
Based recreational programming enjoyer I see, @@TheRealGigachad1848
@@TheRealGigachad1848Assembly? You're gonna leave performance on the table with the linker! Just git gud and learn to edit binary files directly with a hex editor :)
@@TheRealGigachad1848or choose another modern alternative that's objectively superior, like Zig
Good to see Arti is Monero ready!
Someone should write an exchange that works like the Auction House in WOW, exchanging X for Y in crypto. (sol for manero)
It's always a banger when mental outlaw uploads 🔥
They should make arti and tor nodes (optionally) compatible so one can drop it in place into an existing system.
We could just chain/nest the Rust and C variant during the transition period
The bait is glowing.
Should i trust rust programmers to be more competent security researchers?
no but with rust it's harder to make mistakes that allow security reaserchers to break in
No. They are as competent as C programmers. It's just rust compiler spanks *them* when they showcase their incompetence, C starts shooting off feet left and right on the *user* side.
Cve rs
@@marcogenovesi8570 no it's just harder to make mistakes that the language specs is designed to catch, same with using static analysers on any other language (which you should always use)
@rusi6219 cve-rs no longer compiles as of rustc version 1.83
I want a tool that can convert my pretty website to a no-script website.
a text editor
mspaint + screenshots
>rust
So total pass got it. Will use the inevitable Zig rewrite though.
the rise of the zig cult
@@holl7w I'm a proud Zigger 😤
I'd like to know your take on zig?
Zig is not memory safe.
Zig is zig stop zigging me
@@cherubin7th Your not memory safe!
Thanks!
Can you do a whonix for the ultra paranoid video?
wake up babe there's another blazingly fast™rewrite of yet another C software this week
Lol, everytime I hear something about rust, it's some people rewriting things and a bunch of lunatics in the comments fighting everyone that disagrees. Is there any (notable) new piece of software that was made with rust or is it just a toy language a bunch of fanboys try to push into every existing project?
Most of the real use cases are performant low level & embedded stuff with large organizations/projects, which you don't hear much about unless you follow the space. There you do get benefits from pushing standardization/safety.
I do really like Typst though, I'm using it for college. It's a LaTeX alternative that feels more like markdown, much faster and easier. Aside from that maybe Bevy and Firefox.
Rewrite it in C
Nice, I'll use it to acess Facebook here in Brazil.
I dare you to change your name to "mental inlaw"
Rust would be perfect if the Rust Foundation didnt exist
gaybriel
@@holl7w are you restarted?
@@holl7w you wanna bitch on my name with gay when you think OneShot is the best game?
@@GabrielM01 are you mad
What about you the one didn't exist?
Any relation with atari?
As a World of Tanks player, this is the only Arti I will ever approve.
great video man! btw guys new monero node written in rust is coming soon
The fundamental problem of rewriting a security critical piece of software is that you now have two different code bases to maintain... great. Let's see where this goes.
I personally still doubt Rust will solve all issues here and even if it does I hope we at least receive a rewrite of its ugly syntax one day.
Tor Project is aiming to abandon the C codebase in favor of Rust at a later point, so that's only for now.
should i start learning rust?
Yes. In general learning (at least) basics of 1 programming language a year is a good thing.
Expands the horizons on how to write programs.
I think every dev should at least take a peak on every kind of language (functional, pop, high level, low level...) to expand its comprehension of CS, and rust definitely is a unique one, you won't loss your time.
We need a metric for security projects, SLOC written with cat ears on / all SLOC.
This should indicate how closely aligned the project is with the interests of 3 letter agencies.
Tsoding observed the innovation with rust was the moralization over memory safety. These people think they will fix the world. Maybe that naturally appeals to a different kind of person.
Wow, Arti sounds like a game changer for the Tor network! The idea of moving from C to Rust for better safety and performance is exactly what Tor needs.
You're glowing my brother
chill out with the fed post
i believe you officer.
Cool example there at the end but isn't IP address anonymization built into monero transactions via dandelion++?
Rusty onion patches are the future.
You should do a video on 2fa requirements for open-source repositories. I got a notice for something, I believe it was git or hf, and that's a dark path forward.
This has to be so open source, I have a lot of hesitancy of switching protocols into rust for more than a handful of ideological reasons. I understand that c has not been the best for some of the businesses do in part 2 unsafe memory practices. We are in desperate need of better encryption and cryptography in some of these transaction protocols but and there is a massive however making sure that there is no glow Nigerian back doors is of some of the utmost importance in whether or not I am going to adopt this in future implementations. It's exciting to see that there are some new options coming to the market however this seems as if it is coming from a three-letter organization
It's... already open source. Been so since it launched.
Memory safety is very obviously a security enhancement. If rust is the language we should use to get memory safety, that's TBD.
I think in general the US Gov has ways to deanonymize people without using memory overflow bugs so I think it mostly helps protect against other foreign actors.
A year from now youre gonna do another video on how Arti was in fact a gov project and we all fell from the sky when we found out. Happy new year, it is 2025, nothing is made to "just help" anymore.
Why not zig?
I have a feeling people who ask this question have no idea about either of languages
@@AM-yk5ydbased. C forevrr
@@AM-yk5yd i feel like they're not real people
@@holl7w bots. Just like the Rust bot infestation.
How does this compare to Veilid?
Thanks for sharing! Could you help me with something unrelated: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (laundry net argue clarify fish exhibit try secret hair defy art canvas). What's the best way to send them to Binance?
Simultaneous Threading is vulnerable to begin with.
this is great but maybe it would have been easier with cpp and smart pointers for the rewrite.
Hiya, when will you talk about Reticulum?
Dude I been watching ur videos for a year or two now and i have a serious question, can you recommend any path of least resistance to understanding this shit at your level? Like classes and courses to build off because I hate my job and i have been considering a change for awhile now but honestly i don't know where to start to know im learning the correct things and not wasting my time. Sorry I know thats a pretty nonspecific thing to ask but you seem to know your shit so its worth asking since I have been wanting to but keep forgetting. Thanks man and love the videos keep doing what you do your good at communicating this kind of information.
The keywords you’re looking for is cybersecurity engineering
@Derdestroyer2004 that's a start I suppose thank you very much.
Rust won't 100% protect you from memory corruption, some things you simply can't do without unsafe rust code.
unsafe rust is safe if you know what ur doing
@@holl7w c is safe is you know what you're doing 😂😂
What a nice video!Btw , if i have 16GB ddr3 RAM and run win 10 as host os and wanted to run virtualisation and like two vms running linux does the amount of GB i give for each of the distro vary on the distro
should use debian as a host
@ulixir so if i use win currently as host os can i change my host os to a debian distro
Distro and usage. Just try it and if you are running out of RAM increase it.
@FrostByte-o7z yes as long as you retain your virtual machine files in an external storage
what i do is transfer all of my files like documents, pictures, etc and put it on a second SSD and then note down the programs i have installed and install another distro off a USB
> In the thumbnail, finger is on the trigger.
Please be safe when using a firearm.
Will you continue do publish things on odysee? I'd prefer to watch your videos there
ofc its in rust
Siema redstonek
@TeaMaster420 cze
Where do you find this information from?
The biggest irony of Rust community that it's inherently rewrites everything without finishing it. Each time you see another rewrite, you know it's still continuous state..
There are no reasons this one rewrite will be different.
algorithm. Never heard of this, thanks.
this is amazing! Thanks for this!
Now we will have to rewrite it in zig in a coupñe months
Hope it will be able to run as IPv6-only as Tor can't (yet?) :)
Finally some based Rust use without knee socks on old men
Btw axum is seriously awesome!
It's cool that Arti is an upgrade, but I am mostly ambivalent toward Rust with a slight bias against it. Zig is a much less disgusting language syntactically imo, and it doesn't have such a toxic cultmunity.
No party without Arti :)
Weekly fed posting, video #294849 , this glows brighter than the sun kenny 😁
gem, can wait using rust i2p and do my own monero node and simplex chat server
I run a bitcoin node ❤🎉
9:26 Beep
Smoke alarm batt?
Rust is not a holy mary. It has the same memory leak issues if you do not follow their best practice. And I know quite a few programmers who dont care about standards. A rewrite is needed, but we will see memory leaks also in future.
I see hoppe-pepe, I click. Simple as
Amazing now rustrainsformers can ship hormon replacements to children via the dark web
is rust more perfomant than c? How?
They're pretty much very similar in performance, rust is just a very memory safe language.
Probably the base C build has more memory safety catches than the "memory safe" rust LOL
Memory unsafe I could understand, but under-performing? This is not something that applies to C.
rust and tor was not on my 2025 bingo card
In future humans will be rewritten in rust
should i learn rust?
Yes. Learning new languages regularly is a good thing. It teaches solving the same problems different ways and prevents from being insecure stupid PoS when you see that somebody is not using C.
learn assembly
Goated irsdotgov node
Stop coping, the problem is not the C language but the lazy soydevs who don't want to learn C
And no amount of training wheels will make shitty programmer good. On the opposite, if you don't manage memory yourself chanses are height you don't have an idea how the memory works in your app.
Source: i am a shitty programmer.
man this programming language that lets me write to byte 20 of this 10 byte long buffer is sooo unsafe! why hadnt we rewritten half life 1 in rust yet
Rust exists to make C programmers more *c*ompetent... hopefully
For some reason you failed to provide explanation how to learn C. It's almost like you have no idea what you are talking about.
@@AM-yk5yd you're making excuses I can see you're not truly dedicated to the C mindset
Love the Spaghetti Cacio e Pepe at 2:38 😍
Trust the rust ('believe me')
Sharti 🤔
Glowson made the arti
glowing glistening radium
@@Picture_Pigpump
This is hype!!!
They could do it in Golang
Are you uploading more cause you know were on to you Hugbunter
if it's on github.. it probably already has a hidden deepstate backdoor in it. stay safe yall!
Programmed in Rust is not a feature.
yeah memory bugs are not bugs but features after all, so less features then.
Rust it's battle tested. A huge percentage of crypto smart contracts are in rust.
"Arti" literally means "meaning" in Indonesian