The History of Indo-Iranians. Aryan ancestry from Sintashta in percentages. 2200 BCE - 2024 CE
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2024
- This map shows the spread of Indo-Iranians from the Sintashta culture 4200 years ago to this day. It also shows the percentage of proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry, that is, Sintashta ancestry.
Articles:
The formation of human populations in South
and Central Asia
An Ancient Harappan Genome Lacks Ancestry
from Steppe Pastoralists or Iranian Farmers
Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western
Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning
and End of the Scythian Dominance
A Dynamic 6,000-Year Genetic History of
Eurasia's Eastern Steppe
137 ancient human genomes from across the
Eurasian steps
Triangulation supports agricultural spread of
the Transeurasian languages
The genetic origin of Huns, Avars, and
conquering Hungarians
Ancient genomes reveal origin and rapid trans-
Eurasian migration of 7th century Avar elites
Music:
Merlean - Adventures in India
Crusader Kings 2 Songs of India - Alauddin
besieges Chittor
Across the Ocean
Medieval 2Total War Soundtrack-Crack Your
Head With A Tabla
Amazing map. Thank you.
Nicely done, man 👍🏻 Thank you for putting so much effort 💝😊
Amazing effort! Great job
ah good video i am proud of my alanic ancestry
I thank you deeply, king.
The Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry map of South Asia highly correlates with the linguistic map of South Asia except for some regions like Uttara Kannada (North Karnataka, India) which is linguistically mostly Dravidian but their speakers have similar levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry as people from Southern Maharashtra who mostly speak Konkani which is an Indo-Aryan language. Also southern parts of Chattisgarh which has one of the lowest levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but their people speak an Indo-Aryan language.
Apparently, afaik, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand and Odisha region was mostly occupied by various hunter and farmer tribals, and spoke various lost languages in the past, before they homogenized by switching to Kol, Munda and Prakrit tongues.
Alas, I did not find so many genomes in India, probably because I mainly used Vahaduo. For example, I am missing the genomes of Marathis, Konkanis, Sinhala, Assama and Odia. That's why I've outlined them roughly. I would be very grateful if you shared the sources from where you got the genomes.
@@The_Geographer_MapsIranians are arabic people, same genes and dna with arabs, this iranian arab made this un scientific imagination geographic youtube page 🐪🐫🐵🐒🍌🇮🇷
Thank you
This is the real ancestry of the Buddha
Amazing work!
What an amazing work, the video is wrong and not correct from beginning to end.
@@TUNC66 Are you Turkish by any chance?
@@YeastCartography Yes,i amTurk, what's the problem?
@TUNC66 Denying facts because of your national insecurity won't make scythians turkic
Sakas are turkic, look at tagar, tianshan, tasmola etc. saka cultures' autosomal dna inspections. Scythians (western sakas) are a mixture of steppe nomads and old europeans.
Indoeuropean languages have some linguistic connections to uralic-altaic languages over eurasiatic macro family theory. Linguistics will show it more in time.
Hello from Gilan-Iran , sending my love and good wishes to all , great video btw ❤
very nice video, I love these sorts of maps, nobody ever does them!
Tatars are classified as both Turkic and Indo-Iranian languages. In the end, who do they belong to?
😂
"Non-Indo-Iranian speakers" are marked in grey.
Turks
Pls do on one vedic anscestry.❤
It will basically be double of whatever Sintashta ancestry one has. So a Haryanvi with 40% sintashta will be roughly 77-80% Vedic because vedic ancestry essentially means 50% sintashta & 50% IVC.
Can you do one on vedic anscestry pls❤
I am iranan i love Aryans ❤
@yxzhvw348 none of your business
So do I as an Indian
@@iamzeus7368great response to that good job
@@soumyajitsingha9614 During the Neolithic, East Iranian farmers settled in northwestern South Asia and mixed with the native South Asian hunter-gatherers, creating the Indus Valley Civilization. Eventually, the people of the Indus Valley Civilization finally managed to adapt to the more humid and tropical areas of South Asia and migrated south, absorbing extra South Asian hunter-gatherer DNA, creating the Dravidians as we know them. The Dravidians also have some Sintashta steppes, though much less than the Indo-Aryans.
I love ayran with mint 🐫🐵🇮🇷🐪🐒
Can U pls make about sino Tibetan ancestry?🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Yup, I'm a pashtun and got 34 percent steppe ancestry in my DNA test. 22.6% European in illustrativeDNA
I am Jat from west uttar pradesh bijnor district I have 42% stepee ancestry
@@vaibhav_Jat jats have more haha, I had a huge chunk of zagros and anatolian. BMCI
@@maseehwardak6055 yeh you have Anatolian farmer dna also but in india haryana and west uttarpradesh jats have very high stepee ancestry and in some ror community also in haryana and west Uttar Pradesh side other Indian are Iranian neolithic farmer only jats and some ror have high stepee ancestry in india brother
@@vaibhav_Jat here's my full illustrative DNA
38.4 zagros
22.6 Europe.
18.8 anatolia
7.6 amur river
7.2 ancient Indian
5.4 Caucasian
@@maseehwardak6055 really high Amur for a Pashtun
Love the Medieval 2 Total War music!
Love these videos
interesting
is it possible for you to make one on the spread of indo-european genes in america next?
Do one for semitic ancestry
Proto Turks are not Iranians. The video is incorrect wtf
Knk dikkatli izle irani demiyor zaten.
@@tanhukim9963 Soy diyor. O da yanlış?
@@Secular_Turkish knk silik yazılan yazılar var, bir de koyu yazılanlar var. Silik olanlar Hint İran olmayanlar zaten, sadece onların dnasını taşıyanlardır.
@@tanhukim9963 onu anladım zaten. Ancak Proto Türklerin coğrafyası İrani coğrafyadan çok ayrıydı. Proto Türklerin taşıma olasılığı çok düşük ve yanlış
Turks originate from modern day mongolia
What about Mitanni? They came to the Middle East around 1700 BC.
Bro can you make a video on indian caste dna specifically because it might look like all indians have similar dna however many indian castes have very high steppe ancestry and some have none therefore castewise is much better represents indo iraninan dna rather than geography
Geography wise is also correct. No need to bring your casteism here. This map is mostly correct.
There would be millions of dots in the map if he try to do so 😅
@@ShiblyMartin-yp6mj That's true. That is why a column chart is correct
@@jmab721 Let me tell you the reason. Irula a lower indian caste does not have any steppe ancestry while the Iyer brahmin has one of the highest steppe ancestry in tamil nadu. The problem is that dna is in extremes not similar
@@jmab721 caste wise is more relevant. Here in Maharashtra, Chitpavan Brahmins can sometimes score 40-50% Steppe MLBA. Whereas Tribals who are mostly related to Dravidians and Austro-Asiatics score only 5-10% and 1-2% steppe MLBA respectively.
Will there be a similar video about romancers?
Yes, after the Germans.
do you know anything about khasas ?
Ladakhis have no Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry? Phenotypically they look mostly East Asian unlike their Dardic Kashmiri neighbours but even Mongols have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but 0% for Ladakhis?
Mongols have some indo European ancestory because andronovo or some other culture migrated around Mongolia before the rise of mongols there. Ladakhis are mostly just tibetians whom indo Europeans rarely encountered thats why I think they have no aryan ancestory
@@ganeshwarsekhri2810 makes sense, but then how do you explain Nepalis having comparable levels of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry to Uttarachalis and Biharis? Nepal is 30% Tibetan ethnically. Likewise, Ladakh is 51% Tibetan, 48% Indo-Aryan ethnically, and 1% other ethnicities. The similarity in Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between Nepalis and Indians can be attributed to the fact that intermixing between Tibetans and Indo-Aryans is common in Nepal, especially in the Kathmandu region. Similarly, there would likely be some degree of Indo-Aryan influence in Ladakh and therefore among ethnic Ladakhis.
@@jostnamane3951 ladakh is very difficult place reach even more than nepal maybe thats why also nepalis are pahari people and mountains were scarcely populated by proto dravidians thats why aryans didn't intermarry also look at example of himachal pradesh where many people are fair skin and have. Caucasian features
Maybe I should have added Ladakhis. They, unlike other Tibetans, have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry. Apparently Ladakhis can be considered to be 30% Burusho
I wonder, what do you mean by "Indo-Iranian ancestry?" 🤔 Very much looks like adjusting genetic to desirble turkic languages map configuration in the north part.
Nice video, but modern people with 20%, 30% Western Siberian hunter gatherer ancestry? I'm so sorry, but perhaps with the exception of Saami, there is no one alive with such high percentages of this ancestry.
I wonder why Mansi is then considered to have one of the highest ANE ancestry?
i.imgur.com/Rdx1whi.png
This is what Vahaduo shows:
Saami: 68.2% Erzya; 16.9% Nganassan; 15.0% KAZ_Botai.
Mansi: 30.5% Erzya; 40.8% Nganassan; 28.7% KAZ_Botai.
Ket:584_R01C01: 3.6% Erzya; 53.0% Nganassan; 43.4% KAZ_Botai.
@@The_Geographer_Maps Please search the 2023 scientific research "Ancient human DNA recovered from a Palaeolithic pendant" by Elena Essel, ..., Svante Pääbo (Nobel Prize winner) et al.
In this scientific research, they managed to extract human DNA from a Paleolithic pendant found in the Denisova cave in Siberia.
It was concluded that this DNA belonged to two women who were part of the population that became known in the scientific circles as "Ancient North Eurasians" (ANE).
Table 7.2 of the supplementary information from the same research shows the genetic affinities that these two women had with the current people of the world (the higher the value, the greater the genetic affinity):
(I sorted the values in the table in descending order)
f3-statistics
A B C f3
Pima DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271
Pima DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273
Surui DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.271
Surui DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273
Quechua DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.27
Quechua DenPen(deam) Mbuti 0.273
.
.
.
Saami DenPen(all) Mbuti 0.263
Do the Berber language brother
Interesting, I heard the Achaemenid Persians only had around 5% steppe ancestry based on the few examples they had.
I haven't checked the data, but it makes sense. That general region was already quite densely populated by the time the Iranian tribes got there, probably because it was very much tied with Elam and Mesopotamia. So actual replacement was just unlikely to happen.
no that"s impossible
because today persians from that region(while they"re more mixed with elamites than ancient persians) have 18% sintashta
so ancient persians I think were more than 25% sintashta
@@user_18789 impossible. The 20-30% is not really steppe ancestry. It's steppe_mlba ancestry, which is significantly admixed with european farmers. Steppe_EMBA is the real 'steppe ancestry' and it is this kind of ancestry which northern europeans have ~50% of. Yamnaya, Afanasievo and early CWC ancestry basically.
Steppe_mlba are the Sintashta / Srubnaya / Andronovo populations. Basically 70% steppe_EMBA 30% late neolithic farmer.
The peak is with Rors and Haryana jatts who have like 30-35% steppe_mlba or 21-25% steppe_EMBA. But most South Asian Indo-Aryan speakers have significantly less than that, even the Brahmin.
Its less in Armenians, Kurds and Iranians. Armenians have like 5% steppe_EMBA ancestry, depends on individual and if they have ancestry from elsewhere, as some groups in the Caucasus have higher steppe ancestry (peaks around 35-40%) but funnily enough those groups are not Indo-European speaking.
In Iran it depends on the ethnic group but its mostly around 10-15% (EMBA), similar for Kurds. East Iranian have the highest amount of steppe_mlba of Indo-Iranians, around 40% give or take a couple percentages. Or 28% steppe_EMBA roughly.
@@Shtf132
yes I mean steppe _EMBA or sintahsta
Also just armanians have 4% steppe EMBA
but iranian have between 10_33%
steppe(sintahsta)
forexample:
kurds have 16% sintashta
Azeris 12_25%
persians 15%_33%
baluch 22%
lur 10_17%
gilak 15%
you can check it
yes it depends where region are you from
Why did you ignore Rors? They're more Steppe shifted than Jats... Why the hell did you ignore Rors?
Not anymore. Some recent Jaat samples have showed some of the highest sintashta ancestry ever (~45%)
Iranian Sailors also migrated to East Africa, such as Zanzibar, Madagascar Commors and Somalia
That explains why some East Africans show Caucasoid features.
Why does Assam only appear in 1500 when indo aryans moved there in 200?
Khamag mongols occurred on the map too early, they initially consisted of Jalair and Qiyat tribes. Tatars also chnaged their name and initially were an amalgamation of tribes. Naimans were Sekiz-Oghuz initially
Amazing new video, I would like to see the same for Proto Germanics, particularly pertaining to the Settlement of the United States
(Hint if you do that don’t go by census reported ethnicity because it’s super inaccurate just go by “White Americans” or “Euro-Americans” instead. Same with Brazilians, Argentinans, and Australians
Because almost EVERYBODY has some proto Germanic DNA in the Americas because of European Colonization, even if low like in Mexicans and Peruvians due to the Visigoths in Spain
I’m already planning to make a map about the spread of proto-Germans, so I’m already studying the history of Latin America. However, I made maps about the colonization of the USA and Australia precisely because of this map. I put off making maps about the peoples of Western Europe precisely because of colonialism, which is a really complex topic. Therefore, I planned to complete the eastern Indo-European direction first.
I prefer to divide the people of America according to the American Census, as well as according to the "Racial map of the world2" from Masaman.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ancestry_map_of_the_United_States,_2016.png
commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Racial_map_of_the_world2.png
That is, I will designate mixed groups as mestizos, mulattoes, etc. But I will designate peoples who are not particularly mixed, by their European nationality, although this may be accompanied by many inaccuracies, but I will try to have as few of them as possible
He doesn't know anything about europeans, he is iranian, do your arabic roots
@@The_Geographer_Mapswikipedia is pookipedia, misleading information all mistaken, edited by jews, it is not real history
Brother, what is the source of these last photos?
Bullshit
Heggarty et al , yang et al 2024 disapproves indo Iranians being from sintastha petrovka , adna doesnt co relates with sintastha petrovka either, ancient vedic samples lack any mlba related ancestry, this is further backed by finds pf royal chariot burials in sanauli and excavation of burzahom, both lack any steppe
Also Metspalu and moorjani et al perfectly concluded that steppe-mlba ancestry in modern indians arrived only prior to 1000 bce , which is too late to be a be a source of vedic
Mittani Aryan genome from alalakh sample in syria , doesn't has any source of steppe either , mede parthian genome lack it too ,
So i better recommend you to be updated and not misinform people by providing old sources to back your thoughts
"Ancient Vedic samples lack any MLBA-related ancestry". Rakhigarhi sites aren't ancient Vedic sites. Steppe MLBA ancestry arrived with the migration of Vedic Aryans, around 1500-1200 BCE. Implying that it arrived around 1000 BCE or later suggests a desire to portray Vedic Aryans as natives of India, which they were not. Proponents of Indigenous Aryanism are just like Sub-Saharan Africans who lived in huts contributing little to no to the development of any modern civilization until very recently but still claim that Cleopatra was black.
@@jostnamane3951 well mr. Smartass vedic languages are attested before 1000 bce , and 1000 bce date for vedic arrival is too late for anything too be true
@@jostnamane3951 rakhighari isn't vedic but sanauli and abhaypur, kalibangan and vadnagar is vedic indeed
@@boiled_fish_with_rice your point?
Yous have have added gypsy as well since they bought R1a Z93 and Indo Iranian Ancestry In Europe as Well Gypsy Is Missing other wise based vidoe very informative
Indo aryans had entered indus valley earlier,by 1700 bc - refer to gandhara grave culture.
The percentages are all over the place. Persians from Eastern Iran have 20-25%, Persians form the center have 20%, and Lurs and Kurds have 15-20%.
chechens and all south and north caucasians have alanic scythian ancestry
that"s cool
Perfect accurate✅✅✅
Your spelling is not very accurate curry boy india 🦃😂
@@Liam-eo5dythanks for correcting me mehmet.
@@Liam-eo5dy🤜🤜🤜🪳🪳🪳🪳
@@Liam-eo5dy🦃 Turk imagine not being indo european
@@Liam-eo5dynorth indian stepe ancestry goes upto 50% while turk have no steepe ancesty
How is the Germanic progress going my friend?
I've just almost finished the Migration Period. There is more work to be done on colonialism. Maybe in a month map will be ready.
Will be in germanic peoples videos migration of the new world?
@@The_Geographer_Mapshow long until it gets released?
@@ganglosaxon1488you are iranian arab wanna be white western people, you were born dark skinned middle eastern, forget imagination, live real
@@The_Geographer_Mapsdon't do germanic, you are arabic, do your arab brothers kurds persians syrians
It's interesting to see how far these people have gone. Influencing the Mongols and the Turks in more ways then one. Invading India, the Middle East and even Eastern Europe and Korea possibly. Love to the Aryans/Indo-Iranians. ✝️❤️
Thank you for making the Haryana, Delhi region as distinct and more steppe heavy than Punjab. Otherwise people often forget about it, Hindi comes from that core region.
Also, you forgot to add Rors of Haryana, who are 40% Proto Indo Iranian, but rest of the video is fine. Great effort.
Yes also Western UP I believe is more steppe heavy than Punjab
This is fake information, highest steppe aryan ancestorry percentage is found in Nordic Europeans , original aryans looked like that not Delhi Haryana 😂
@@ashri3494 Aryan ancestry means Proto Indo Iranian ancestry, nordics don't have that. Pehle tu apna unpadd gawaarpana durr kar, fir baat kar.
@@jmab721they have it who are you fooling around jackass 😂 , closest populations to sintashta are mostly Nordic phenotype European ethnicity groups not Delhi Haryana one
@@jmab721 ganwar Dravidian , check pictures of rors they don't look anything like Dravidian. They look more like kalash chitpavan etc types in terms of phenotype 😊
Fascinating that central Asians have higher Indo Aryan ancestry than even Persians.
Yes
It depends on what is meant by Indo Iranian ancestry. The people with the highest amount of steppe ancestry are Northern Europeans.
@@stsk1061 The first known peoples of the nomadic Aryans were the Scythians, Sarmatians and Yuezis. They are not Northern Europeans. They were Caucasian horse-drawn nomads who spread from Eastern Europe to the Mongolian steppes.
@@aliklc1970 The Aryans were just Steppe people mixed with Neolithic Europeans. This is basically the same population that exists in Northern Europe today.
@@stsk1061 No way. Unlike northern Europe, it is a mixture of eastern European steppe nomads and indigenous northern European hunter-gatherer people
Another great work from you!
based
n imagination, dreams to be western and white man 😂
Bro added the Turkic and Mongolic peoples as Aryans lol tbf the Turkic and Iranic people have been intertwined for many centuries now but still the two groups are from very different heritages. Also Pashtuns did not exist that early on they are an amalgamation of different peoples similar to Tajiks(amalgamation of Soghdians, Sakas, Khwarizmians, Turks and Tocharians who adopted Farsi/Persian as their main language just like Pashtuns and more similarly like the Hazaras a group mainly of Turkic tribes and some Mongolic tribes mixing with a pinch of natives and forming a new ethnic group / tribal confederation and adopted Persian for the sake of convenience).
Non-Indo-Iranian-speaking groups with Indo-Iranian admixture are shown with grey labels
interesting, coming from the forests to the steppe, intermixing with the altaic people, then retreating to the mountains and plateaus of the south while the bulk of their proto ancestry gets spread across the continent by the turks and mongols
Linguistics today doubt that Altaic is a real language family. They just say Turkic and Mongolic, a connection between the two families cannot be proven.
@@Ravie3 Sure they can.
The word for arm/hand (these languages tend to use the same word for both):
Proto-Japonic: ta(r)i
Proto-Koreanic: tali
Proto-Mongolic: gar
Proto-Turkic: kar(i)
In Mongolic languages the word for arm has developed a martial sense of flank or wing of an army, while in Turkic it has developed into a more merchantile sense of a unit of measurement, usually ranging between the length of a forearm (cubit) to the length of 2 arms.
The divergence in connotation from a word that originally referred to the same thing suggests a common origin rather than a loanword.
@@siyacer My dude, don’t do amateur linguistics research, leave it to the experts. Neighboring languages, through contact, can share vocabulary or even sound/grammar changes, which is why determining what’s a cognate and what’s a loanword can be so difficult to figure out. The professionals who study this for a living say that there’s no concrete evidence that Turkic and Mongolic stem from a common root.
@@Ravie3 Did you seriously just call a paraphrasing of an actual peer-reviewed article "amateur linguistics research". Sure, if you love your "experts" so much, here's an article on the topic. Search up "Triangulation supports agricultural spread of the Transeurasian languages"
@@Ravie3 😂😂😂 aferin siz bu kafayla devam edin
Bro forgot East Thrace 💀💀💀
Do Kazakhs and Kyrgyz belong to Aryans?
only partly.
So, turkics from central asia are ethnically more iranian than persians? Thats crazy
If the Turks had not come, we probably would have had more iranian in central asia
persians of afghanistan and tajikistan have highest genetic of sintashta on earth
Turks are from Mongolia and aren't Netive of central Asia
@@Unknown_Soldier_2 İran'da Türk topraklarıdır
0:07 I love the history of the people of the central Asia.
Turks have got high percentages bcz they mixed with the already living indo iranins of central asia on the mother side, otherwise there were no turks in central asia.
Tocharians and iranic scyhts dominatet you tousend of years 😅
@@ChristopherTanne-se3pzyes as i say iranians>>>>... You people
Wannabe Aryan spotted
@@soumyajitsingha9614understand my comment first
@@soumyajitsingha9614abhijit chavda fan i presume😂 you are not aryan and certainly your face dont look like one !
Afanassievo Culture is ignored in this video. Such complex matters cannot be described just by an animated map.
Because the Afanassievo Culture didn't carry indo-iranian ancestry they were related to indo-iranians but not identical and they spoke in proto-tocharian language(they are both indo-european) only maybe in iron age and bronze they interacted each other and intermixed and tocharians in this time started to have dna from sintashta gene pool
@@Yokina-kana many Indo-Aryans carry afanassievo genetics. As an example, my steppe admixture is 22% sintashta type and 6.5% afanasievo type.
@iacko12345 The admixtures between both happened several centuries later after Afanassievo Culture with the migration of indo-iranians in tarim basin
Bro, ground evidence plz, not hypothesis !!?..
Aint no way Kazakhs are on average more Indo Iranian than Indians and Iranians lol
Why do haryanvis have higher percentage than punjabis punjab plains were where aryans entered they should have higher percentage.
Haryanvis do not necessarily possess a higher Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry; rather, it is the Eastern parts of the Punjab region 🇮🇳🇵🇰 (encompassing Modern-day Haryana, Indian Punjab, Pakistani Punjab, and Himachal Pradesh) that exhibit a higher percentage of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry compared to Western Punjab 🇵🇰 (Modern-day Pakistani Punjab). The map illustrates the overlap of Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry between what is represented as Punjabis (or Eastern Punjabis🇮🇳) and "Hindis" (or Haryanvis🇮🇳). My theory is that Aryans who settled in the Punjab region (especially Eastern Punjab) were less prone to mixing because of the already fertile landscape of the region and low population. Whereas Aryans who settled in Central (Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh) and Eastern parts of India (Bihar and Madhya Pradesh) were more prone to mixing because of the already high population of these regions.
@@jostnamane3951Haryana is literally the core of Vedic expansion.
Himachalis do not have high PII ancestry, they are a max of 25% PII, whereas Haryana max PII is 43%.
Hindi, Prakrit, Sanskrit all expanded from the core area of Haryana, Delhi, northwest UP so it is not surprising that the heaviest steppeMLBA is also here.
Other variables like Punjabis becoming more liberal wrt to free mixing, or being at the forefront of attacks, are also responsible why PII is slightly less in Punjab. It's a direct continuum where Pakistan Punjab is 25-30% max PII, Indian Punjab is 35% max PII, and Haryana is 43% max PII.
@@jmab721fake information , Haryana don't have high steppe just the jats and rors who are high steppe mostly stay in Haryana they have elevated steppe due to being Scythian heavy mixed , other haryanvi normal
@@jostnamane3951 Jat's were Indo Saka desendents (all Jat's were High Steppe) including North Rajasthan, haryana, West up, even two North district of Gujarat.
I am East Persian and I got 30 percent Andronovo, balanced by my copper age ancestry.
باید 7 8 تا بچه بیاری 😂
Mannai no irans, they is pre-irans
Oh nice. As a Persian Kurd Azeri I find this very interesting. thank you very much for your work
Persian Kurd Azeri?
@@tanhukim9963 yes I have diverse ethnicity
@@qpdb840 Azerbaijanis= Turk
@@tanhukim9963 Not Oghuz Azeri Azeri Iranian
@@qpdb840 If Azeris are Iranians, Hazaras are Turks. Does race look at DNA? Even Mongolians have more Aryan DNA than Azeris. Are they Iranian too? Also, Mongolians mostly have Turkish DNA. But we do not come out and call the Mongols Turks.
Kurds have around 20-25 steppe ancestry, also there was a parthian migrations into Western Iran. And the medians got parthianzied
Kurds have the most Iranic DNA even more than than Persians
So there is no genetic influence of Indo-Iranian nomads on eastern Europe?
Hmm, well, I heard that the Indo-Iranians and Slavs seem to be genetically close. And the same Eastern Slavs (Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians) had contact in ancient times with the same Scythians
@@justperson7551slavs habe white skinned eurooeans, iranians dark skinned asians, 2 different races and 2 different continents, i heard it 😂😂 it is not about what you hear, go to school arab boy
@@AriArian-it1wkaverage history stealing turk :
@@MuhammadFazil-xs9gg i am from armenia, you are liar iranianarab
@@MuhammadFazil-xs9gg The fatherland of both proto slav and proto iranians is around dniper river.
Proto iranians move eastwards while proto slavic stay around not far. They both are part of the "satem" language. satem=hundred
proto germanic and celt went westwards.
You should make native American ancestry
Do semitic
Germans were never aryans, lol
Most steppe ancestry of modern day indians probably comes more from steppe invaders rather than indo aryan speakers.
?
Well, it's a theory, don't take seriously !.
Nope in that case Hindus would not be more steppe heavy than local muslims
The AASI amount for pashtuns seems to be unnacurate.
I'm a karlani pashtun with Gm377 haplogroup. And in illustrativeDNA I got :
38.4% zagros
22.6% European
18.8% Anatolian
7.6% Amur river
7.2% AASI
5.4% Caucasian.
noice
❤❤❤
It started in modern Kazakhstan🇰🇿
Russia actually
Carduchii☀️🦅
Do a proto germanic one
These are very wrong chronological calculations.
The Sintashta culture, descends from the people of northern Europe, the Corded Ware culture from the upper Volga (Fatyanovo culture) .
Corded ware✅
*of northern Europe❌
Do arabs
This is very unnacurate for pashtuns, it's as if you ignored all the pashtuns from South Central Afghanistan and kandahar and only looked at samples from Pakistani pashtuns who are heavily mixed with natives of khyber pakhtunkha
SouthWestern Turks/ Yoruks would score %20-25 sintastha ancestry
No. %10
@@tanhukim9963 you liar bastard, Even central Turks could score %25 sintasta like in this video, how is possible yoruks have %10 sintastha ancestry
th-cam.com/video/JxMbrtK7R0g/w-d-xo.htmlsi=GGHq2UnIf3j62brw
@@user-sk8lf2vp5lBecause they mixed with the natives of the paleo Balkans and Anatolia.
@@tanhukim9963 Anatolian natives had just %3 Yamnaya ancestry and there is no real Balkan ancestry except in northwest Turks. Therefore, I didn't mention northwestern Turks.
@@user-sk8lf2vp5l O now. Okey bro 🙂👍
why not add russians and ukrainians? iranians used to live in much of ukraine
They are Slavic
Because the channel holder is ihnorant.
@Unknown_Iranian_Soldier1 The Slavic are one of the major Aryan group in Europe.
No iranians only lived in arabia, not in europe
@@antonival50slavian people are different race, you iranian arab, slavians are europeans
Persians have today 5 to 10% proto indo iranian ancestry.
Iranians haplogroup is in average 30% R1A/R1B . How can you explain this?
As we can see in the world map, sintashta is related to turkic people, not to iranic people, otherwise Iran, India are not so indo-iranian. 😂
But to be honest, I like all these indo-iranic friends, because we all are mouslim countries in common. Greetings from Turkey!
Turkestan geography has east eurasian dna more than indo iranian
Can't imagine wronger display of Eurasian population explanation.
Yep and your a unicorn right?
Aryans now think twice before calling Turks assimilated. They have assimilated, they don't know. Kurdish %5🤣
Kurds are largely indigenous to their lands, they are not Aryans or have any significant Aryan/Steppe DNA, they only speak an Indo-Iranian language
Kurds are iranized Assyrians Aramians by medes in fact
@coginito8365 Iranians are actually of Elamite and Kassite origin. They assimilated with Aryan immigrants coming from Central Asia. There is little Aryan influence on their genetics.
@coginito8365 it's because Modern-day Biharis are mixed with Austro-Asiatic people who came to the region even later than Aryans. Ancient people from what is now known as Bihar didn't look like that. Look at the portrayals of Chandragupta Maurya and some other ancient "Bihari" emperors and rulers. Most of them had pale-yellowish skin tone. Plus I know plenty of good-looking Biharis.
@coginito8365 every Jat I’ve seen looks like a brown punjabi though, most Aryan DNA is concentrated in the Khurasan region, north Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Tajikistan, and the Turkic central Asian countries
Jats have highest steppe Aryan dna in south Asia
Yep that's their only achievement
@@based4560 they acheived lots of achievments
@@based4560😂😂😂
Highest ancestry 40% 💀
Saka and Scythians are of Turkish origin.
Nope, there is evidence of Royal Scythian words from Greek texts and medieval Saka texts from Hotan and Tumxuk which prove their language was Eastern Iranian.
Both are Iranian
Chill guys this theory is fake
Pajeet you still belive that debuncked Out of india theory.
It's not since we have genetic and cultural evidence
@@sahilsingh6048 pajeet me nahi tu hai cry more
@@legionnaire2 🤡 Aryans came from india not europe , hindu scriptures written by aryans themselves says that
@@saitamaserious5100 you have no idea what you are talking about but keep telling yourself that
Not accurate
What do you find to be inaccurate in the video? Personally, I find it hard to believe that Ladakhi people have no Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry despite being surrounded by Dardic speaking Aryan Kashmiris, even Mongols have some Proto-Indo-Iranian ancestry but 0% for Ladakhis according to this video.
@jostnamane3951 That the fact is not shown! The fact that Sintashta ancestry came very late in India and probably due to elite Sakan migrations. It's becoming increasingly clear that the whole Indo-European 'western steppe origins' is a myth. Instead, Indo-European either originated in lower Caucasus or central steppe (below Urals and east of Caspian). I personally lean towards central steppe. Since the dawn of man, people have migrated from eastern and central steppe to western steppe and Europe, including the later Turks and Mongols and perhaps the Indo-Europeans themselves! The reverse was not so common and barely occurred even in the Bronze Age and Copper Age, the time Indo-Europeans speaking communities exploded. Sintashta ancestry, for example, came late into India, and only via Scythian/Sakan admixture. Indo-European languages are quite different from Caucasian languages despite the apparently large sound inventory, and also share vague similarities with Siberian and Uralic ones. In fact, the central steppe was probably occupied by old hunter Europeans and North Eurasians, as evidenced from adjacent areas, and both of those groups have significant contributions in modern Europeans and Central Asian populations, making the case stronger. Yet, the later, western steppe 'Yamnaya' ancestry is rarer and not ubiquitous as some may hold it to be. Horses were also domesticated more east than the western steppe.
It's quite explainable as Indian literature also talks about migrants to India who occupied the northwest, aka the Indus Valley and eastern Hindu Kush. They are regularly called "Mlecchas" (the "ch" here is an aspirated form of the "ch" used in English for "chocolate", otherwise written as "c" for South Asian linguistic transcription), which means foreigners, and influenced Hinduism, and its various aspects. Sakans were Iranians, and their tongues lacked some features of Indo-Aryan languages, which probably influenced the northwest Indo-Aryan languages (they lack the breathy voiced sounds, for example). In fact, Sakans penetrated continuously into India, and gave a lasting, considerable mark on most South Asian bloodlines. They are frequently found in Brahmin lineages, suggesting their elite status was retained during caste reforms in ancient India.
The video is wrong in several aspects, as the Sintashta ancestry entered much later and spread more gradually (the rate at which the color gradients shift in this vid for South Asia seems like a few men r*ped a lot of women in just a few years, which is also unlikely considering the relatively large population of the area even back then).
Well then, where did the Indo-Iranians/Aryans come from? Probably from an eastern offshoot of the Indo-Europeans in the central steppe, whose hunter European/North Eurasian ancestry gradually was diluted by pastoralist Iranian/Khorasani ancestry as they penetrated into Central Asia via the Pamir-Tianshan-Altai Mountain Corridor, and then successfully encroached upon the Oxus civilization and Indus-Saraswati civilization (IVC) lands, with very similar genetics and medium-scale elite dominance (elites patronizing their languages and culture onto those below them). More archeological excavations of post-IVC northwest India and Copper Age central steppe would shine light into these yet poorly understood population dynamics.
Note that, by 'India', I meant South Asia in general, not just the modern country.
@@king_halcyon modern-day Indians barely have any Steppe/Aryan ancestry. And why have you added Saraswati to the name of the Indus Valley Civilization?
@@ayzmalo5553 that's my point as well. Also, I added that considering Saraswati was a major river of the civilization as well. And maybe because I don’t like "Valley" in the name, so that's why. The name doesn’t matter in this context.
Indo aryans are hindu 🕉️😊❤
No , but , there religion was close to arya samajists of today
@@sahilsingh6048Vedic religipn then became brahmanism which became hinduism
@@based4560 im saying about which Sect of hinduism is most similair to vedic religion in Todays time , mostly Arya samajists and Smartism are similar and still follow very similar ideology.
The steppe were primitive spear throwers who hid within caves due to their highly sensitive s((((s. They could never have invaded India nor gotten through the civilised IVC. The real aryans are zagrosians. Not euros.
Fake
Cry😂😂
4:12 только русские поймут "Yueban" 😂
Yeubana blyat?
Turkish Not Slab Grave Turkish are orgin Sintashta
The Mongoloid (Proto-Turkic) peoples in the Altai Mountains embraced Iranic culture (horsemanship, nomadic way of life, traditions, clothing) and mixed with the Iranians to form their own unique Iranic-Mongoloid
No, the Indo-Europeans and Indo-Aryans, along with hunters and gatherers from the Corded Ware cultural sites, spread directly to the cultural centers of the Proto-Turks, namely Sintastha and later Afesefinovo and Andronovo, and the Turks had to become nomadic further east. In the east, they mixed again with the hunter-gatherers of the east, became Scythians, goldfinches and returned to their homeland. Sintastha and its extension link cultures have nothing to do with Indo-Europeans and Aryans. At the center of the Pre-Turkic formation is a link that took place with the invasion of Indo-Europeans by the Aryans.
@@gokhanevsen1886 History has preserved the names of some of them: Ishpakaia, Bartatua, Madyes, Idanthyrsus, , Skyles, Tigratavā , Octamasadas, Xāravalāna, Artavatauxma, Zarinaea, Sodasa, Sawarmag, Saurmag, and Zari- "golden". This was the name of a legendary Saka (Scythian) warrior queen. They are Indo-Iranian horse nomads Iranians speaker, they have Iranian names.
@@gokhanevsen1886 It was an eternal battle between Turks and Scythians, as it was beautifully narrated by the poet Ferdosi in Iran's national stories of Shahnamé.
@@gokhanevsen1886 Haplogroup C evolved into Mongoloid genes, Turks, Chinese, Mongols and so on.
Horse riders who lost their horses in India 😂😂😂
Бред
MEGA BRUH MOMENT VIDEO