Your right, it's not the businesses responsibility to watch your child. However, it is the businesses responsibility to place a lock on a faulty machine which they know works without coins. The owner also knew the machine locked when it started and would not unlock until it finished. A piece of paper with broken written on it is not enough. A parent could have their back turned long enough to pull clothes out of a washer or dryer and this exact thing happen. Mom was at fault as well because she saw her child climb on/in that machine and didn't stop them. I agree with the judge.
you should watch your children EVERYWHERE!!! as a teacher this UPSETS ME TO NO END!!!! watch your kids and be diligent on them behaving! YOU DONT, THEN IT BLEEDS INTO THE CLASSROOM. then be prepared to MAKE ENOUGH TO BAIL THEM OUT OF JAIL because they'll never amount to anything other than a burden on society. WATCH AND DISCIPLINE YA KIDS!!!
@@Muncho_informationnot watching her child is 100% her fault. But the woman said she knew her kids would climb into those machines as they've done it before. So she should have locked this machine or disconnected it. If she's going to allow kids to run a muck around her business place. They were both at fault. I mean as a single mum of 2 with a disability, I watched my kids like a hawk. I'd have had them help me fold the washing. And they'd have enjoyed it. I would not be letting them run around climbing into washing machines. That's lazy parenting.
And I did not need to hear that she's a single mother and that they all sleep together and are so close, etc. She tried to portray the laundromat owner as a horrible person, which she isn't, but she could have softened her approach a little. I think that's why the judge kind of sided with the mom. But the whole "thank you jesus" genuflecting at the end made me bilious.
@@AnitaCole-ug6nqit's dumb, you're right. Not funny. Far too many people let their kids do what they want and don't tell their kids NO. It's messed up. And she got her money for being a lazy parent.😮
Second Case: How does your child climb in a washing machine, & you not 👀 it? It's called neglect! I'm sorry, I agree with the owner. She's not being insensitive, she's just being honest! I can't stand when ppl allow their kids to run around. Get a babysitter if you can't watch them!! Gtfoh it's ALL the mother's fault!!!
It takes longer than FIVE SECONDS for a toddler to climb inside a small opening of that size .. Then for the other child to slam the door shut .. Let's hope mama is a lot more careful in future 🙏🏼 I disagree with the judges award decision in the 2nd case .
@@m-o-lthank you! I had 5 boys under 5 and having to go to laundromats. Kids climbing into or on machinery was a big fear for me. Plus you've got creeps everywhere. You do not ever let small kids out if your sight. If you have multiple then get those leash/backpack things. Those can be a huge help for parents with multiple kids or kids prone to wander.
He actually said he would stay on the ground. That should have showed the judge that she was wrong. They played the judge and got a million bucks. If I was Mr. Roberts I'd appeal that mess. And little missy needs to put a hairbow in that hair and stop slinging it. She had a horrible attitude/ personality. And so does mama. Who leans on something like that and doesn't check it first? I'm sorry but the judge was wrong.
She gotten so happy when she heard the amount of money she was getting that she forgot about her daughter, I have been going to laundromats and I see children running around like little animals and parents sitting watching their phones or talking on phone I see are careless about their children, the mother should of been 💯% at fault .
I agree with the judge. She’s not fully responsible, yes she should have been watching them. However the machine should have been shut down or blocked off in someway so a curious child can’t climb inside. The woman could have put duct tape or something else to keep the door shut. The laundrymat is therefore liable because they knew of the broken machine and what it was doing. The mother didn’t know, even though there was a sign. The sign wasn’t specific, so she couldn’t have known what would happen. The owner did. The owner should’ve have been a more responsible business owner. If I saw a sign that said broken on a washing machine, my brain would automatically think it probably just doesn’t work as in turning on. Not that the thing fills up by itself without you paying.
the mother sounds like a drama queen and a parasite. All rights and no responsibility. The kids should be taken away from her for negligence and she has the audacity to blame the laundromat owner.
@@Cassandra20208wrong case love. There's a 2nd case after this railing 1. Where a 3 year old climbed into a washing machine in a launderette and their sibling shut her in. The washing machine was faulty and the machine started filling with water and going around. Watch that and see who you think was in the wrong. I think the judge just about got it right. But being a disabled single parent. I blame the parent mostly. She should have been watching her kids. Infact she watched it happen and didn't tell them not to. Pretty neglectful IMO.
I agree with you a lot of parents now and days don’t watch their kids or even tell them anything when they see what they doing is wrong I hate parents like that WATCH YOUR KIDS don’t let them be savages and blame someone else what she wanted a daycare center at the laundry
It’s his responsibility to make sure the place is safe. If certain areas are unsafe he should have clearly stated and marked areas that were off limits.
@@nature-kv3xe my colleague told a child to stop running in a store [we are teachers so this was not her place of employment]. the father and the uncle FOLLOWED HER HOME AND KILLED HER IN HER BATHTUB!!!!! TRUE STORY!!!
@@belinalug6928 they are real cases BUT these are actors for the show, playing the roles. These are not the actual people involved. Note. By the time any case got to court, bandages and bruises would most likely be long gone.
This was so not real, evidenced by this (and I totally agree with you), very poor acting job!!! I didn't need to get too far into this first falling photog story, too realize this was moreso a clear case of poor acting, and not so much poor maintenance. But I do hope they are actual stories.
In the first one: the property owner had painted over rotted wood which would have hidden any signs of damage. He also didn’t give the girl any restrictions as to where she could go to film. This is even more concerning because if he planned on repairing the railing for guests then why’d he already put new paint on it? Someone was bound to get injured, or worse because of his negligence!
@@ayeishaallen6886bruises on movies are usually due to some real and some not. Look at KJ apa from riverdale. He literally broke his hand for a scene. Anything is real tbh
@@nature-kv3xeI don't think it was his fault for the simple fact that the girl didn't have to be in the video to get the beautiful view ..plain and simple..the view would have been better without her face in it😮😮😮
@@dragames It is so sad you are the only one I've seen to notice it was terrible acting and even the costume make-up for her injuries was more like what you see on Halloween. Was nowhere realistic looking and cuts like that would be bandaged, not just out in the open. It was for the dramatics.
Same here, if I was that judge I'd take back my verdict and give her less or maybe even nothing at all for making a spectacle of herself. I mean, seriously, can't she just take it graciously instead of doing what she did at the end.
Do not leave your kids ever un attended. You know how your kids are not listening kids. People don’t disciple their kids and are ready to try and get money when they get hurt. This mother is a trip and her act is unbelievable. Take responsibility for your children after you have them. They will forever be your responsibility. I agree with the judge. They both were negligent. I first would have unplugged the machine and put tape all around it so the door could not be opened. Secondly I would inform the clients that their kids could not be unattended at any time on my premises. Teach your kids you do not run inside of any building or anyone’s home.
Laundry owner should have unplugged or locked the machine. Yu now play by different rules & are held to higher standards the second yu start selling products OR inviting customers onto yur premises. She didn’t just welcome customers, she welcomed children onto her premises yet failed to address clear dangers to children as she never saw this as a danger. They’re both at fault but laundry lady should have done better.
LOL! He painted over a rotten bannister. And he told them to go ANYWHERE for pics and videos. He is totally responsible. If the mother was out there with her, would she have been able to save her? Of course not. She saw the same painted bannister. The home owner was the only one that knew that it was rotten. He should have had it roped off and told them where they could and couldn't go. It's his responsibility because it's his property, LOL!
The mother is not responsible. That girl is not 3 years old. I am dumbfounded how many people think it is the mothers fault. Leaning against a banister is not a circus act, many people to that in one way or another. The banister is supposed to be strong enough.
First case i get the legal responsibility of the property owner but you should never trust a railing to protect you from gravity. That girl was very careless. Second case: 15 feet away in public is way too far for a toddler. She was being negligent
Uh would you measure out 15ft for me and say that again? 😂😂😂 I see the point you're trying to make, but most kids at 15ft are still safe with food parents
When yu have a business that sells products or invites customers inside, yu are now playing by a new set of rules ; held to different & higher standards. All the laundry owner had to do was unplug the machine. The problem is, she never saw it as a danger, even though she knew that the machines lock was busted preventing cycle from being stopped once started & she’s welcoming children onto her premises. Things like this can happen in a fraction of a second while the mom turns her back to move clothes. They both share fault, but laundry lady is held to standards where she should have done better.
@@howardhecht4233 I agree 100 percent the reason I say the owner is 50 she should have covered or overly tapped the door also the play area shouldn’t have been a corner that’s more of a time out area kids hate being in corners 😂 if she atleast made a proper area for the kids I feel she would be 40% at fault
@@hansenhollla6705 Listen to the video again. She explained why 1 washer can't be unplugged from the rest of the bank of washers. That said, she should have duct taped the washer closed. The lock wasn't busted. Those machines are designed for the door to remain locked until the wash completes. The woman was there with 2 kids. The kids area has 2 chairs at a table for kids. That's where those kids should have been. Or at least at the mothers side. I did laundry at a laundromat when my kids were young. I took them with me to do laundry every week. There were no kids play areas. They stayed at my feet sitting on towels on the floor. I took books, coloring books, crayons - stuff to keep them busy ON their towels. I come from the era where parents are responsible for their kids or got kicked out if they didn't keep them in line. The only thing the business owner did wrong was not taping the door of the washer closed. She should have been 20% responsible for the child's medical bills and no responsibility for pain & suffering going forward.
It was not the washing machine owners fault that the child got into the washing machine. The mom even admits that she would have been dishonest if she knew she could wash without coins. The mother is guilty and the judge has ruled both cases on his emotions and not the law. Disgrace on him!
he's not a real judge. These are not real. These are written by a person who does not know law but pretends to. Especially his weird version of trying to say "We have to look at were you wronged, did the defendant cause the wrong, and how much is that wrong" that's the most lazy way of writing 'civil cases'.
The second case I can believe he ruled in favor of the mom. She wasn’t watching her kids. When she saw them climbing on the machine in the machine she should have yelled at them to stop.
I hope you're aware this isn't a real court battle, lawyers would be involved in hundreds or million dollar settlements, these are recreated incidents and judgements.
That’s what happens when you don’t watch your little ones people! They don’t know right from wrong yet and they’ll end up hurt or worse. It only takes a few seconds to turn your back for a tragedy to happen
Regarding the second case, the mom is responsible for not monitoring her child at all times as she should, in my opinion.I'm afraid I have to disagree with the outcome.
If the balcony banister was just recently painted he should of checked for rotting. Any time we’ve ever repainted our balcony, we inspected and checked it for mites, and rotting beforehand. I also used to work in the hospitality industry and part of my job was making sure the property was safe structural wise. Because we knew if any of our guest got hurt by a broken floorboard, or carpeting that was pulled up slightly. We were held responsible because it’s our duty to provide a safe place for people to stay and enjoy their vacation. It’s really slumlord like to not make sure your properties are properly maintained, and that they are safe for any of your guests. The first guy really shouldn’t be operating his ranch as a place for people to stay if he can’t live up to that expectation.
I totally agree. the owner sought her out to stay there to drum up more business for his ranch. he was intending on hosting guests in the future and should have made the place habitable and safe or marked off the places that were unsafe. shame on him for trying to place blame on a minor
In the second case, I believe the mother was shedding tears of guilt because she knew it was her responsibility to watch out for her child. That was total neglect on her part. The children are more important than the clothes. Usually blame shifting occurs, when individuals refuse to take responsibility for making wrong choices. What a shame.😢
Second case I blame the mother for not begin attentive to her children. Owner should have locked or put some kind of lock etc.. on the door of the machine.
I disagree completely on the second case decision, the mother is completely at fault. Then the act she put on at the end, should’ve watched your child the entire time. It’s not the owners fault, a sign was on the machine and the “mother” let her child wander off. NEGLECT! I wouldn’t pay a dime, I’d take her to court again. She can’t tame her child in a laundromat, I can’t imagine how she acts at home 🤷🏾♀️
One time I actually hopped into a dryer when I was younger and it got turned on. It was one of the scariest things that has happened to me. My mother put us to sleep and went to bed herself about 20 mins later me and my brother got out of bed and went downstairs. We thought it would be fun to play in the dryer until I got stuck in there and got injured really badly my mother heard our screams from the laundry room and came down to find I had gotten cut up on my leg. I ended up with about 10 or so stitches.
I agree. I honestly would of just awarded her the $9,000 for medical and that’s all. Just to teach her a lesson and also to have that laundry mat owner be more couscous with things that are damaged. But I can understand how she would never think anyone would climb in
I don't understand why everyone says the mother is responsible the girl is 17 years old she doesn't need her mommy for everything but I do blame the guy for having a faulty balcony and not having a secure environment
You can tell that it’s scripted because the jury doesn’t act like that. They don’t all shake they’re head no/yes and they don’t all go 😮 or ☹️ they genuinely listen and keep their emotions inside.
That’s the audience, not the jury. The judge is making his own rulings without the input of any jury. Also, they don’t put jury members behind the plaintiffs and defendants because they can’t read their body language that way.
😡That 2nd case is 100% the parent’s fault!! She neglected to watch her kids! I was thinking it was a top loading machine. A front loading washer is a difficult to get into…so those kids had ro be climbing etc etc! 💡If I owned a laundromat NO KIDS WOULD BE ALLOWED!😡
Laundromat Case: The mom 100% at fault. The mom did not stop immediately when she saw her youngest daughter heading towards the broken machine to avoid unwanted accident. Yes, the owner could've done a lil more to secure the broken washing machine. Judges decions was wrong.
Laundromat situation was definitely the mother’s negligence. The laundromat owner had signs on the faulty machine and the mother saw her child climbing on it and didn’t stop her
Hes most likely not going to pay cause the absolute worse thing that can happen to him is his wage garnishment and even then they can only garnish a specific percentage and most people get judgments thrown out through bankruptcy. Both plaintiffs in this case will be lucky if they get a fraction of what they're rewarded
Kids don't know any danger... it is up to adults in charge to protect the,. In that scenario it was up to her mom... not the laundromat owner, and her trying to blame her is wild asf.
He didnt bother warning them that the balconies may be rotten and he knew it and he said she could go anywhere not telling her about the danger of the balcony
Well he also didn’t expect shorty too go throwing her weight on things she definitely could of did the sturdy test I’m almost certainly all of us do with anything above a storie tall. Talking bout “U need attractive views” no tf you don’t people are attracted too raw and genuine content less is always more what u need too overly impress for shorty still got lyfe confused stick too packing suit cases shorty 11:25
@0tnthevillage961 she didn't "throw" her weight against it she leaned up against it like any other normal person would do. Not her fault she wasnt warned to stay away from the balconies because they were rotting. That's the landowners fault COMPLETELY. He knew some of them were rotting and using common sense if some are rotting than all of them might be rotting. He knew it was a problem and failed to warn his guests. It's not like she was hanging off of them or standing on top of them, all she did was lean on them. Plus he recently painted the balcony so I'm sorry there's no way he didn't know it was unstable. He SHOULD have warned her to stay away from the balconies but instead he told her she could go anywhere on that property to get a nice photo/video. He is absolutely to blame for what happened and to try and blame the victim is ludicrous.
@@SilverGhxst it’s a 50/50 type a case shorty like I said anyone with common sense with heights your gonna check for sturdiness FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY everything happens in this lyfe for a reason hers just so happened too be getting blessed with a check and spend it on no one but they self
10ft? Bro ain’t no way she got THAT hurt by falling like only 2 meters😂😂, mommy is just looking for a jobless life. And that judge probably isn’t even a real judge, I graduated laws 5 years ago and I’ve never seen a judge act like these tv judges🤡
Of course. Because you are an expert on velocity vs. weight vs. height vs. landing surface that you can guarantee that someone could fall 10ft off a balcony onto jagged rocks and not get...what was it? THAT hurt? People get hurt all the time by tripping over their own feet and have landed wrong and cause all kinds of injuries if the conditions are right. But Oh No! Absolutely no one could get THAT hurt falling ten feet onto jagged rocks. Glad he didn't have a fancy pointed palisade fence in place of the rocks or she could have been impaled. Or, can someone not get impaled from that height if they fall on it? I figured I would ask you since you are the expert here. p.s. Did a quick search and found that 25% of fatal falls occurred on falls that were less than 10ft. But no one gets THAT hurt falling ten feet.
Yeah when you watch Judge Judy sometimes she says well this is a TV show so it just a show and they have to make it so people are going to want to keep watching
I’m not saying that something more shouldn’t have been done to better disable the washing machine, but it’s every parent’s responsibility to keep their kids under control. I’ve raised four kids, and taken them to public laundry facilities, and many other places. I kept my kids close by me. The mom said her girls were fifteen feet away from her! That’s too far for anyone to act quickly enough to prevent a disaster!
@@blazeddragon4202 in the girls defense, she certainly didn't look 300lbs. If someone her size leaning against the rail caused it to fail, how about all the guests he was planning on hosting in the future? It was going to fall with the next person or so, just happenend to be a minor and she legit got hurt.
The mother is at Fault 100%.She has neglected her child they dont have control. Mother saw her child climbing and she should have stop her at the first place. BAD JUDGE
In that first case the responsibility lays entirely with the property owner for not carrying out a full RISK ASSESSMENT and taking appropriate measures to protect his guests. That girl could have DIED falling off that balcony! I personally fell off a roof, so I know how scary and dangerous it can be. A friend fell out of a first floor window and landed on his head. He nearly died, and had life changing brain injuries. Sadly at age 33 he will never work again. The judge ruled fairly, and the girl deserved to win the case. SAFETY FIRST!
GIRLIE I HAD TO ZOOM IN TO SEE THE PLAY AREA 😭✋🏽, 23:56 AND WHY WAS THE PLAY AREA RIGHT NEXT TO THE WASHING MACHINES?!, YOU WERE LITERALLY ASKING FOR THIS 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭💀💀💀💀💀✋🏽✋🏽✋🏽✋🏽✋🏽
Sorry, the second case, the mother should of stopped her children from running around, and especially playing with the washing machine Keep your children under control, and no harm would have come to her child.
Agreed. However, the owner should have locked up, (pad lock), the broken machine. I agree with judge on this one. The owner is 60% at fault because it was her property and her responsibility to protect her customer's, (including their children), and herself. The very same thing could have happened while the mother's back was turned taking clothes out of the washer or dryer; which is something you have to do when doing laundry. Broken machines always had padlocks on them in every laundry mat I've ever been to. What I do disagree with is the mother saying the owner didn't care. If the owner truly didn't care, she would have tried to stop the man from breaking the window on the machine. She didn't. At the time, she cared less about her machine and cared only about getting the little girl out. It didn't occur to any of them at the time to throw the breaker in order to cut off all power to every machine. The door would have still been locked but the tumbling would have stopped. Those machines should also have an emergency button of some kind for the possibility if this very issue.
I don't understand how the mom was not found 100% at fault. What a terrible judge. Any laundry mat I have been to just has signs on the broken washers how would you secure one?
She probably rolled after hitting the ground and her face hit the rocks causing her injuries. I'm really surprised her back wasn't broken even with landing on her backpack.
1.5 million in pain and suffering?!?!? It’s definitely the landowners fault but not for that much !! Her daughters injury’s just made them millionaires!
Seven figures on the first case is too much. More appropriate would've been full amount on past medical, $200,000 for future expenses and occupational therapy, and another $200,000 for loss of potential career if full use of the hands is not restored.
In the first case, exactly how did the girl land when she fell? She said her backpack broke her fall, so you assume she landed on her back, but her face, head and hands are all messed up as though she landed face down. I'm a little confused. Did I miss the explanation? Can anyone clarify?
One option: She said she was showing her backpack. So she could have been holding it in one hand and taking pictures with the other. She could have landed on her front. Another option: She said she landed on the wall. If her backpack was on and she landed on the wall she then could have rolled to one side and fallen from the wall
I don't see how the laundromat owner is responsible at all like how neglectful do you have to be as a parent that your child is able to climb into a washing machine in the first place
Watch your children!! I agree with Mrs. Clarke. Get a sitter or leave them with a family member if you cannot control your children. I was a single mom with 4 and they SAT DOWN until or I left them with a sitter when I washed laundry.
I'm surprised that people keep talking about the mother in story 2 and how horrible mother she was, and nobody about the owner and why she didn't unplug the defective washing machine. Also as a teacher I can tell you, that you can have children RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, and they will still do something crazy in those 10-30 seconds you were not looking at them.
Gotta watch your kiddos. Especially toddlers... toddlers zip into things their not supposed to be in like the flash. My kid has me looking around like a crackhead sometimes because it only takes a moment for them to seriously hurt themselves, and they don't have the sense to not do things that WE find obvious like for example... CLIMB INTO A FLIPPING WASHER... so be aware, even if you look like a crackhead 😂. It's okay though, that stage can be exhausting sometimes but it's not forever.
24:00 even if the child area is small; as a parent you ALWAYS keep control of your kids. Yes it’s terrible this happened but it would not have if she was watching her children and kept them close.
Watched this a few weeks ago or something I lost it at that guy's reaction to when the judge ruled in favor of the girl who fell through the railing 😁😁 Looked it up just to see that again. I caught it right at the end on TV now I might watch the full episode.
In the first case the moulage is bad. The owner’s response is incompetent. His railing should not have been so easy to break. A judgment without evidence of permanent impairment of this much is ridiculous.
Not mentioned here. Did they have business insurance? Did they follow proper building codes? Why didn't the owner say something to mom when the business owner saw the children running around and knowing there was a potential danger present? Why wasn't adequate signage used to inform machine out of order, children must be supervised at all times, children not allowed to play in equipment, not responsible for unsupervised children, laundry rules etc (Big, bold and highly visible signage) a hand written sign is not adequate. I agree with the judges decision. There is neglect on both sides
Had the mom supervised her child properly this wouldn't happen. You know children get in everything and the younger the more you watch them. The mom is at fault.
Always always look before you lean, even if it looks ok! Social media always comes after your safety.... Yes all rooms should be up to code and in a safe condition and if it is not there should be warnings signs and or closed off so nobody could get hurt...
Video #2 Was definitely the moms fault. I have children 5 and under and go to the laundromat too and never have I ever, even as a child myself experienced a babysitter inside them joints. You are 100% responsible for your personal items and children. Seriously there’s signs and notices everywhere you look in them places. Mama need to take accountability, busy or not your children are your responsibility regardless of where you go unless left in someone else’s care.
I’ve heard that on most of these court shows that the show actually pays the judgement & both the defendant & plaintiff are paid for their appearance. A lot of times people will make up cases knowing win or lose they’ll both get paid.
The second case is honestly just bs tho. I feel terrible for the kid, no way should anyone ever have to go through that. But the thing is, the mother shouldve been the one taking responsibility cuz THATS HER KIDS, she should have kept them close and kept an eye on them. Did she do that? No, cuz if she did then this wouldnt have happened. I dont see how the other lady was 60% responsible for this
Not only that but gets on her knees putting up that act after she was awarded all that money. That little girl has medical insurance I’m sure. She didn’t pay a dime.
SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WATCHING HER KIDS. A million kids go to laundry mats and I've never heard of this. Smh. Plus the sign!!!!!! Start leaving them with a babysitter if they don't listen. Smh. That business should not have to pay.
as a kid, I was in a car wreck...the car rolled over me, I was left permanently disabled, nearly died several times, missed my entire senior year of high school and spent my early 20's learning to walk again...I got $15,000...cases like this are so hard to watch!! (we had lousy lawyers who were fired from their firm after our case was done for taking money from insurance companies in exchange for getting clients to accept low-ball offers.)
she fell because of this man's rail, which he did not mention was rotten or unstable anywhere, and even said the people could go ANYWHERE. You don't expect the things that are meant to keep you safe to be broken and do just the opposite.
Yes her fall is absolutely due to his negligence. She was an invited guest and the property was not well maintained and he should have had signs posted and he should have told her not to go on the balconies ect, so that makes him 100% responsible for her injuries.
How is the average man going to pay them a million dollars? and how does the extra money outside of the medical expenses change anything for them? They’re money hungry
Problem he said you can take pictures any where in the house so he’s wrong because he know of the danger saying you can go any where in the house is like saying you can go upstairs
@21:22 --> If that ever happens, is there usually a main switch in close proximity to the machines to shut off the power? Would that have assisted in this instance? Thank you.
![[Live] : ONE 169 วันนี้!! "อนาโตลี vs อูมาร์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IK3YZVWuFJg/mqdefault.jpg)
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.15 (1/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/TLBjiHvkKtE/mqdefault.jpg)
2nd case was the mom's fault. You should always watch your children at ANY laundromat. Not the businesses responsibility to watch your kids.
Your right, it's not the businesses responsibility to watch your child. However, it is the businesses responsibility to place a lock on a faulty machine which they know works without coins. The owner also knew the machine locked when it started and would not unlock until it finished. A piece of paper with broken written on it is not enough. A parent could have their back turned long enough to pull clothes out of a washer or dryer and this exact thing happen. Mom was at fault as well because she saw her child climb on/in that machine and didn't stop them. I agree with the judge.
100% mom’s fault
you should watch your children EVERYWHERE!!! as a teacher this UPSETS ME TO NO END!!!! watch your kids and be diligent on them behaving! YOU DONT, THEN IT BLEEDS INTO THE CLASSROOM. then be prepared to MAKE ENOUGH TO BAIL THEM OUT OF JAIL because they'll never amount to anything other than a burden on society. WATCH AND DISCIPLINE YA KIDS!!!
@@Muncho_informationnot watching her child is 100% her fault. But the woman said she knew her kids would climb into those machines as they've done it before. So she should have locked this machine or disconnected it. If she's going to allow kids to run a muck around her business place. They were both at fault. I mean as a single mum of 2 with a disability, I watched my kids like a hawk. I'd have had them help me fold the washing. And they'd have enjoyed it. I would not be letting them run around climbing into washing machines. That's lazy parenting.
And I did not need to hear that she's a single mother and that they all sleep together and are so close, etc. She tried to portray the laundromat owner as a horrible person, which she isn't, but she could have softened her approach a little. I think that's why the judge kind of sided with the mom. But the whole "thank you jesus" genuflecting at the end made me bilious.
How do you see your child climbing into a washing machine and you don't stop her simply because you're folding clothes. It's just funny😂
It's not funny at all it's crazy that she didn't holler and say no are something
@@AnitaCole-ug6nqit's dumb, you're right. Not funny. Far too many people let their kids do what they want and don't tell their kids NO. It's messed up. And she got her money for being a lazy parent.😮
ENTITLEMENT. 😂 THEN BLAME IT ON SOMEBODY ELSE. HOPE THEY CAN APPEAL
That's the attitude of most parents today. It's their fault their children misbehaves
Want some cheese with that wine
Second Case: How does your child climb in a washing machine, & you not 👀 it? It's called neglect! I'm sorry, I agree with the owner. She's not being insensitive, she's just being honest! I can't stand when ppl allow their kids to run around. Get a babysitter if you can't watch them!! Gtfoh it's ALL the mother's fault!!!
It takes longer than FIVE SECONDS for a toddler to climb inside a small opening of that size ..
Then for the other child to slam the door shut ..
Let's hope mama is a lot more careful in future 🙏🏼
I disagree with the judges award decision in the 2nd case .
It's probably some legal thing. Often things like that are the property owner's responsibility,not the parents, for right or wrong.
@@m-o-lthank you! I had 5 boys under 5 and having to go to laundromats. Kids climbing into or on machinery was a big fear for me. Plus you've got creeps everywhere. You do not ever let small kids out if your sight. If you have multiple then get those leash/backpack things. Those can be a huge help for parents with multiple kids or kids prone to wander.
I love Zoe but he didn’t help that case at all🤣❤️🤦🏼♀️
HE SAID “maybe I fell off the building” 🤣🤣🤣😭😭😭😭😭
He actually said he would stay on the ground. That should have showed the judge that she was wrong. They played the judge and got a million bucks. If I was Mr. Roberts I'd appeal that mess. And little missy needs to put a hairbow in that hair and stop slinging it. She had a horrible attitude/ personality. And so does mama. Who leans on something like that and doesn't check it first? I'm sorry but the judge was wrong.
😂😂😂yo he really didn't. If anything he made it worse😂😂. I still love him tho😂
I'm weak when he said you would think I feel off the building 😂
@@mizzlynn9595 🤣🤣He was no help boo. They should of cut that part out😂😂😂
She gotten so happy when she heard the amount of money she was getting that she forgot about her daughter, I have been going to laundromats and I see children running around like little animals and parents sitting watching their phones or talking on phone I see are careless about their children, the mother should of been 💯% at fault .
She’s 17, but I agree with you
@@Bratzismylifethey're not talking About the 1st case with the railings dear. There is a 2nd case after that 1.
And kids should sit next to their parents and just behave.
@@Bratzismylifeyou can't be that slow 🤦🏽♀️
@@Bratzismylifegirl she’s not even an adult yet after 19 that girl can do whatever she wants.
I don't understand how the owner of the laundromat is fully responsible for the child's mum's irresponsibility! That was an unfair case
I agree. That mother just wanted money
This show is not real, it is all faked.
Exactly. How much of that money went to the kids. Zero I bet.
I agree with the judge. She’s not fully responsible, yes she should have been watching them. However the machine should have been shut down or blocked off in someway so a curious child can’t climb inside. The woman could have put duct tape or something else to keep the door shut. The laundrymat is therefore liable because they knew of the broken machine and what it was doing. The mother didn’t know, even though there was a sign. The sign wasn’t specific, so she couldn’t have known what would happen. The owner did. The owner should’ve have been a more responsible business owner. If I saw a sign that said broken on a washing machine, my brain would automatically think it probably just doesn’t work as in turning on. Not that the thing fills up by itself without you paying.
the mother sounds like a drama queen and a parasite. All rights and no responsibility. The kids should be taken away from her for negligence and she has the audacity to blame the laundromat owner.
No to 1,600,000 but yes to 100,000 medical expenses and 250,000 for pain and suffering for a total of 350,000 this judgment was way over reaching
i kept waiting for the bazinga after the reward amount !!
$250,000 for is way too much for pain and suffering!! WHY WASN'T THE MOTHER WATCHING HER CHILD??!?
Why is the owner there? Didn't he have insurance?
I'm not laughing but I agree this parent should have been watching her daughters
I don’t agree with the amount granted for pain and suffering either.
The mother of the two children is 100% responsible for her children. Period. Gone are the days of personal responsibility 🙄
Nothing mom could have done mom even may have leaned on a tailining
@@Cassandra20208wrong case love. There's a 2nd case after this railing 1. Where a 3 year old climbed into a washing machine in a launderette and their sibling shut her in. The washing machine was faulty and the machine started filling with water and going around. Watch that and see who you think was in the wrong. I think the judge just about got it right. But being a disabled single parent. I blame the parent mostly. She should have been watching her kids. Infact she watched it happen and didn't tell them not to. Pretty neglectful IMO.
Accountability is a foreign country on Mars lol
No. The laundromat should've turned off the broken machine.
The mother can make all the excuses she wants, it still comes down to her not watching her children
I agree with you a lot of parents now and days don’t watch their kids or even tell them anything when they see what they doing is wrong I hate parents like that WATCH YOUR KIDS don’t let them be savages and blame someone else what she wanted a daycare center at the laundry
Ya it’s not just one parent
It’s his responsibility to make sure the place is safe. If certain areas are unsafe he should have clearly stated and marked areas that were off limits.
Did the banisters break?
How was he supposed to know?
She fell off because she was leaning and put weight on the banister it's her fault.
@@X1cfm1 he clearly saw and stated few banister was weak and almost giving in?? Also if u cant atleast lean into railing why is there a railing ?
Parents need to supervise the children, not let them run freely.
exactly. the owner should NOT have been sued for 96,000 that's insane
The owner is in the wrong. He should of told him and have a sign
They want to put the responsibility on other people. Then sue when something goes wrong.
really? you ever say to a parent to watch their kids??? THEY GET BUTTHURT OVER IT AND CAN RETALIATE.
@@nature-kv3xe my colleague told a child to stop running in a store [we are teachers so this was not her place of employment]. the father and the uncle FOLLOWED HER HOME AND KILLED HER IN HER BATHTUB!!!!! TRUE STORY!!!
It's a laundromat NOT a daycare. The mom is 100% at fault 🤦♀️
Exactly!
She’s 17 years old
@@2000girlsshe’s talking about the 2nd case.
I agree 100 percent not a day care dangerous
@@lizibarra7862 Ik the person who commented on the second case deleted the comments 🤷♀️
Poor acting, but interesting cases.
Indeed
@@belinalug6928 they are real cases BUT these are actors for the show, playing the roles. These are not the actual people involved. Note. By the time any case got to court, bandages and bruises would most likely be long gone.
This was so not real, evidenced by this (and I totally agree with you), very poor acting job!!! I didn't need to get too far into this first falling photog story, too realize this was moreso a clear case of poor acting, and not so much poor maintenance. But I do hope they are actual stories.
@@rezotydnic yes your correct that's what I was referring to but should have said that they were acting out the real life situations.
I said exact same thing 😂😂😂😂😂😂
In the first one: the property owner had painted over rotted wood which would have hidden any signs of damage. He also didn’t give the girl any restrictions as to where she could go to film. This is even more concerning because if he planned on repairing the railing for guests then why’d he already put new paint on it? Someone was bound to get injured, or worse because of his negligence!
psst, it's fake. they're actors.
@@dragamesI swear I said the same thing it looks like there acting those bruises look like bruises on movies
@@ayeishaallen6886bruises on movies are usually due to some real and some not. Look at KJ apa from riverdale. He literally broke his hand for a scene. Anything is real tbh
@@dragameshow do you know got proof
The girl in the first case is just a spoiled rotten and entitled little brat, who should have more common sense for her age
When that man lost in the first case I could feel his anger coming through my screen 🤣
It was his fault 😂
you're very gullible to not be able to tell this very bad acting.
@@nature-kv3xeI don't think it was his fault for the simple fact that the girl didn't have to be in the video to get the beautiful view ..plain and simple..the view would have been better without her face in it😮😮😮
do you not know this is not real? its like wrestling...
@@dragames It is so sad you are the only one I've seen to notice it was terrible acting and even the costume make-up for her injuries was more like what you see on Halloween. Was nowhere realistic looking and cuts like that would be bandaged, not just out in the open. It was for the dramatics.
I can't stop, I cant.. did she really just get down on her knees yelling thank you thank you?! Im so trigged by this and don't know why!! Lol
Same here, if I was that judge I'd take back my verdict and give her less or maybe even nothing at all for making a spectacle of herself. I mean, seriously, can't she just take it graciously instead of doing what she did at the end.
The mother in case 2 is such a big act, showing clearly that she knows she's guilty
💯
Agree
Do not leave your kids ever un attended. You know how your kids are not listening kids. People don’t disciple their kids and are ready to try and get money when they get hurt. This mother is a trip and her act is unbelievable. Take responsibility for your children after you have them. They will forever be your responsibility. I agree with the judge. They both were negligent. I first would have unplugged the machine and put tape all around it so the door could not be opened. Secondly I would inform the clients that their kids could not be unattended at any time on my premises. Teach your kids you do not run inside of any building or anyone’s home.
@@Stars101-n7cbut she said she can’t unplug the individual machine. She’d have to unplug them all. Then she wouldn’t have a business
Laundry owner should have unplugged or locked the machine. Yu now play by different rules & are held to higher standards the second yu start selling products OR inviting customers onto yur premises.
She didn’t just welcome customers, she welcomed children onto her premises yet failed to address clear dangers to children as she never saw this as a danger.
They’re both at fault but laundry lady should have done better.
Oh my word, I’m shocked. He blamed the shop owner? And gave that negligent mother $96k. Un freaking believable. I’m outraged.
They can appeal. She is irresponsible mom.
This story seems a little bit fishy
LOL! He painted over a rotten bannister. And he told them to go ANYWHERE for pics and videos. He is totally responsible. If the mother was out there with her, would she have been able to save her? Of course not. She saw the same painted bannister. The home owner was the only one that knew that it was rotten. He should have had it roped off and told them where they could and couldn't go. It's his responsibility because it's his property, LOL!
The mother is not responsible. That girl is not 3 years old. I am dumbfounded how many people think it is the mothers fault. Leaning against a banister is not a circus act, many people to that in one way or another. The banister is supposed to be strong enough.
@@AnnemieM They are talking about the second case! The daughter was 3 and she didn't watch her!
First case i get the legal responsibility of the property owner but you should never trust a railing to protect you from gravity. That girl was very careless. Second case: 15 feet away in public is way too far for a toddler. She was being negligent
Uh would you measure out 15ft for me and say that again? 😂😂😂 I see the point you're trying to make, but most kids at 15ft are still safe with food parents
What a show the mother lit on at then end. She’s 100% responsible for her kids
When yu have a business that sells products or invites customers inside, yu are now playing by a new set of rules ; held to different & higher standards.
All the laundry owner had to do was unplug the machine. The problem is, she never saw it as a danger, even though she knew that the machines lock was busted preventing cycle from being stopped once started & she’s welcoming children onto her premises. Things like this can happen in a fraction of a second while the mom turns her back to move clothes.
They both share fault, but laundry lady is held to standards where she should have done better.
I would say 50/50 definitely have to put some blame on Mother for not watching her kids. and the owner for not securing the machine.
Agree but everyone is different
@@howardhecht4233 I agree 100 percent the reason I say the owner is 50 she should have covered or overly tapped the door also the play area shouldn’t have been a corner that’s more of a time out area kids hate being in corners 😂 if she atleast made a proper area for the kids I feel she would be 40% at fault
@@hansenhollla6705 Listen to the video again. She explained why 1 washer can't be unplugged from the rest of the bank of washers. That said, she should have duct taped the washer closed. The lock wasn't busted. Those machines are designed for the door to remain locked until the wash completes. The woman was there with 2 kids. The kids area has 2 chairs at a table for kids. That's where those kids should have been. Or at least at the mothers side. I did laundry at a laundromat when my kids were young. I took them with me to do laundry every week. There were no kids play areas. They stayed at my feet sitting on towels on the floor. I took books, coloring books, crayons - stuff to keep them busy ON their towels. I come from the era where parents are responsible for their kids or got kicked out if they didn't keep them in line. The only thing the business owner did wrong was not taping the door of the washer closed. She should have been 20% responsible for the child's medical bills and no responsibility for pain & suffering going forward.
It was not the washing machine owners fault that the child got into the washing machine. The mom even admits that she would have been dishonest if she knew she could wash without coins. The mother is guilty and the judge has ruled both cases on his emotions and not the law. Disgrace on him!
It was definitely the mom's responsibility to monitor & correct her children's actions!! 🤬💯
U know these things are fake
he's not a real judge. These are not real. These are written by a person who does not know law but pretends to.
Especially his weird version of trying to say "We have to look at were you wronged, did the defendant cause the wrong, and how much is that wrong" that's the most lazy way of writing 'civil cases'.
Sit down karen!!!! Just because you don’t like his Verdict!!! I can’t
@@nunnywinethere not fake!!
Wow she played it up and got out of being responsible. What an amazing judge, letting parents know they can get away with not being reaponsible.
Yup
The show is faked.
It's called liability
The second case
I can believe he ruled in favor of the mom. She wasn’t watching her kids. When she saw them climbing on the machine in the machine she should have yelled at them to stop.
I hope you're aware this isn't a real court battle, lawyers would be involved in hundreds or million dollar settlements, these are recreated incidents and judgements.
I totally agree.
She deserved it how she will pay her hospital buils
That’s what happens when you don’t watch your little ones people! They don’t know right from wrong yet and they’ll end up hurt or worse. It only takes a few seconds to turn your back for a tragedy to happen
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
She packs how we learned to pack in the military this isn’t a new method but I’m glad she’s teaching other young people how to do it
Regarding the second case, the mom is responsible for not monitoring her child at all times as she should, in my opinion.I'm afraid I have to disagree with the outcome.
If the balcony banister was just recently painted he should of checked for rotting. Any time we’ve ever repainted our balcony, we inspected and checked it for mites, and rotting beforehand. I also used to work in the hospitality industry and part of my job was making sure the property was safe structural wise. Because we knew if any of our guest got hurt by a broken floorboard, or carpeting that was pulled up slightly. We were held responsible because it’s our duty to provide a safe place for people to stay and enjoy their vacation. It’s really slumlord like to not make sure your properties are properly maintained, and that they are safe for any of your guests. The first guy really shouldn’t be operating his ranch as a place for people to stay if he can’t live up to that expectation.
I totally agree. the owner sought her out to stay there to drum up more business for his ranch. he was intending on hosting guests in the future and should have made the place habitable and safe or marked off the places that were unsafe. shame on him for trying to place blame on a minor
Don't worry you can still make TH-cam videos and your fans well still follow you. Even with the scars.
In the second case, I believe the mother was shedding tears of guilt because she knew it was her responsibility to watch out for her child. That was total neglect on her part. The children are more important than the clothes. Usually blame shifting occurs, when individuals refuse to take responsibility for making wrong choices. What a shame.😢
Second case I blame the mother for not begin attentive to her children. Owner should have locked or put some kind of lock etc.. on the door of the machine.
I disagree completely on the second case decision, the mother is completely at fault. Then the act she put on at the end, should’ve watched your child the entire time. It’s not the owners fault, a sign was on the machine and the “mother” let her child wander off. NEGLECT! I wouldn’t pay a dime, I’d take her to court again. She can’t tame her child in a laundromat, I can’t imagine how she acts at home 🤷🏾♀️
One time I actually hopped into a dryer when I was younger and it got turned on. It was one of the scariest things that has happened to me. My mother put us to sleep and went to bed herself about 20 mins later me and my brother got out of bed and went downstairs. We thought it would be fun to play in the dryer until I got stuck in there and got injured really badly my mother heard our screams from the laundry room and came down to find I had gotten cut up on my leg. I ended up with about 10 or so stitches.
First guy admitted to the court he knew there were banisters that needed repair. Final nail in the coffin.
This judge did not handle this case correctly as a personal opinion! She should have been watching her kids !!!!
I agree. I honestly would of just awarded her the $9,000 for medical and that’s all. Just to teach her a lesson and also to have that laundry mat owner be more couscous with things that are damaged. But I can understand how she would never think anyone would climb in
I don't understand why everyone says the mother is responsible the girl is 17 years old she doesn't need her mommy for everything but I do blame the guy for having a faulty balcony and not having a secure environment
You can tell that it’s scripted because the jury doesn’t act like that. They don’t all shake they’re head no/yes and they don’t all go 😮 or ☹️ they genuinely listen and keep their emotions inside.
I mean you can’t dictate human behavior
That’s the audience, not the jury. The judge is making his own rulings without the input of any jury.
Also, they don’t put jury members behind the plaintiffs and defendants because they can’t read their body language that way.
😡That 2nd case is 100% the parent’s fault!! She neglected to watch her kids! I was thinking it was a top loading machine. A front loading washer is a difficult to get into…so those kids had ro be climbing etc etc!
💡If I owned a laundromat NO KIDS WOULD BE ALLOWED!😡
Watch your kids when you're in the laundry , I always watched my kids or they stayed home
My only question: Who put the money in the machine? Personally, never have I seen a washing machine that will start without money.
It was faulty and worked as soon as you closed the door. But the owner had a work order, at least Showing that there was some due diligence.
Laundromat Case: The mom 100% at fault. The mom did not stop immediately when she saw her youngest daughter heading towards the broken machine to avoid unwanted accident. Yes, the owner could've done a lil more to secure the broken washing machine. Judges decions was wrong.
The judge always rule in the plaintiff favor in every case
Laundromat situation was definitely the mother’s negligence. The laundromat owner had signs on the faulty machine and the mother saw her child climbing on it and didn’t stop her
Definitely the mothers fault. At the end she acted like she won the lottery 😂😂😂 what a shame..smh
Fair judgement.. besides I'm just wondering how is he gonna pay 1.6million
Hes most likely not going to pay cause the absolute worse thing that can happen to him is his wage garnishment and even then they can only garnish a specific percentage and most people get judgments thrown out through bankruptcy. Both plaintiffs in this case will be lucky if they get a fraction of what they're rewarded
I’m hoping he’s insured
This is acting bro, not real😂. Google it
@@tingztakstym9269 Don't spoil it lol
@@tingztakstym9269😮
Kids don't know any danger... it is up to adults in charge to protect the,. In that scenario it was up to her mom... not the laundromat owner, and her trying to blame her is wild asf.
He didnt bother warning them that the balconies may be rotten and he knew it and he said she could go anywhere not telling her about the danger of the balcony
Well he also didn’t expect shorty too go throwing her weight on things she definitely could of did the sturdy test I’m almost certainly all of us do with anything above a storie tall. Talking bout “U need attractive views” no tf you don’t people are attracted too raw and genuine content less is always more what u need too overly impress for shorty still got lyfe confused stick too packing suit cases shorty 11:25
@0tnthevillage961 she didn't "throw" her weight against it she leaned up against it like any other normal person would do. Not her fault she wasnt warned to stay away from the balconies because they were rotting. That's the landowners fault COMPLETELY. He knew some of them were rotting and using common sense if some are rotting than all of them might be rotting. He knew it was a problem and failed to warn his guests. It's not like she was hanging off of them or standing on top of them, all she did was lean on them. Plus he recently painted the balcony so I'm sorry there's no way he didn't know it was unstable. He SHOULD have warned her to stay away from the balconies but instead he told her she could go anywhere on that property to get a nice photo/video. He is absolutely to blame for what happened and to try and blame the victim is ludicrous.
@@SilverGhxst it’s a 50/50 type a case shorty like I said anyone with common sense with heights your gonna check for sturdiness FOR YOUR OWN SAFETY everything happens in this lyfe for a reason hers just so happened too be getting blessed with a check and spend it on no one but they self
Wow. That was terrible acting…
I would've liked to see a picture of the broken rail.
10ft? Bro ain’t no way she got THAT hurt by falling like only 2 meters😂😂, mommy is just looking for a jobless life. And that judge probably isn’t even a real judge, I graduated laws 5 years ago and I’ve never seen a judge act like these tv judges🤡
Of course. Because you are an expert on velocity vs. weight vs. height vs. landing surface that you can guarantee that someone could fall 10ft off a balcony onto jagged rocks and not get...what was it? THAT hurt? People get hurt all the time by tripping over their own feet and have landed wrong and cause all kinds of injuries if the conditions are right. But Oh No! Absolutely no one could get THAT hurt falling ten feet onto jagged rocks. Glad he didn't have a fancy pointed palisade fence in place of the rocks or she could have been impaled. Or, can someone not get impaled from that height if they fall on it? I figured I would ask you since you are the expert here.
p.s. Did a quick search and found that 25% of fatal falls occurred on falls that were less than 10ft. But no one gets THAT hurt falling ten feet.
also im sure it is actually more than 10 feet... i think she was just saying a number AROUND the actual height@@youonlyliveonce47
Yeah when you watch Judge Judy sometimes she says well this is a TV show so it just a show and they have to make it so people are going to want to keep watching
Glad she didn’t get what she thought …the girl is arrogant angry and to blame 👍
I knew a lady who died from falling off a 6 foot scaffold.
I’m not saying that something more shouldn’t have been done to better disable the washing machine, but it’s every parent’s responsibility to keep their kids under control. I’ve raised four kids, and taken them to public laundry facilities, and many other places. I kept my kids close by me. The mom said her girls were fifteen feet away from her! That’s too far for anyone to act quickly enough to prevent a disaster!
It blows my mind that these kids of today have lost all respect for anyone including themselves😢
The judge was fair in the 1st case as:
1) the owner allowed AND encouraged her to go ANYWHERE.
2) The banister was damaged.
I mean yea but come on you can't put 100% on a rail ... Even if it was in code it could still fall apart
@@blazeddragon4202 in the girls defense, she certainly didn't look 300lbs. If someone her size leaning against the rail caused it to fail, how about all the guests he was planning on hosting in the future? It was going to fall with the next person or so, just happenend to be a minor and she legit got hurt.
@@spirosmith1389 She's cute tho
The mother is at Fault 100%.She has neglected her child they dont have control. Mother saw her child climbing and she should have stop her at the first place. BAD JUDGE
I feel so sorry for the child clostrophobia , ptsd and all those things
In that first case the responsibility lays entirely with the property owner for not carrying out a full RISK ASSESSMENT and taking appropriate measures to protect his guests. That girl could have DIED falling off that balcony!
I personally fell off a roof, so I know how scary and dangerous it can be.
A friend fell out of a first floor window and landed on his head. He nearly died, and had life changing brain injuries. Sadly at age 33 he will never work again.
The judge ruled fairly, and the girl deserved to win the case. SAFETY FIRST!
😂😂 I’m sorry this is hilarious!
Edit…the reaction to the courtroom the whole time 😅😅
This has to be fake right 😂
@ashleighpearson7447 yes it looks very staged
GIRLIE I HAD TO ZOOM IN TO SEE THE PLAY AREA 😭✋🏽, 23:56 AND WHY WAS THE PLAY AREA RIGHT NEXT TO THE WASHING MACHINES?!, YOU WERE LITERALLY ASKING FOR THIS 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭💀💀💀💀💀✋🏽✋🏽✋🏽✋🏽✋🏽
Sorry, the second case, the mother should of stopped her children from running around, and especially playing with the washing machine
Keep your children under control, and no harm would have come to her child.
Agreed. However, the owner should have locked up, (pad lock), the broken machine. I agree with judge on this one. The owner is 60% at fault because it was her property and her responsibility to protect her customer's, (including their children), and herself. The very same thing could have happened while the mother's back was turned taking clothes out of the washer or dryer; which is something you have to do when doing laundry. Broken machines always had padlocks on them in every laundry mat I've ever been to.
What I do disagree with is the mother saying the owner didn't care. If the owner truly didn't care, she would have tried to stop the man from breaking the window on the machine. She didn't. At the time, she cared less about her machine and cared only about getting the little girl out. It didn't occur to any of them at the time to throw the breaker in order to cut off all power to every machine. The door would have still been locked but the tumbling would have stopped. Those machines should also have an emergency button of some kind for the possibility if this very issue.
I don't understand how the mom was not found 100% at fault. What a terrible judge. Any laundry mat I have been to just has signs on the broken washers how would you secure one?
How did the girls face in the 1st case get messed up when she said she landed on her backpack?
She probably rolled after hitting the ground and her face hit the rocks causing her injuries. I'm really surprised her back wasn't broken even with landing on her backpack.
Makeup artist no way ten feet did that.
Not counting she claimed the back pack prevented her from braking her back, insinuating she fell on her back. Clearly all fake... lol
I have watched this show a lot...why am I 😭... WHEN THE JUDGE WAS READING HER AWARD..SHE DESERVES EVERY PENNY...🙏❤🙏❤🙏
SWEETHEART ❤ FROM JERSEY SMILE ❤
How ridicules it was to have this ‘Influencer’ Zoei take the stand. This is Truly making a Mockery of our Court System!
exactly. like who even is that
sorry to bring you to reality but our court system was not made for everyone.....trump showing that.
Our court system already was on its own ☠️☠️
1.5 million in pain and suffering?!?!? It’s definitely the landowners fault but not for that much !! Her daughters injury’s just made them millionaires!
27:34 I love how everyone laughed when she said she would have washed her clothes there if it was working without coins lol
Seven figures on the first case is too much. More appropriate would've been full amount on past medical, $200,000 for future expenses and occupational therapy, and another $200,000 for loss of potential career if full use of the hands is not restored.
In the first case, exactly how did the girl land when she fell? She said her backpack broke her fall, so you assume she landed on her back, but her face, head and hands are all messed up as though she landed face down. I'm a little confused. Did I miss the explanation? Can anyone clarify?
I think what she meant was, somehow the front side of her body landed on her backpack, yet everything else got injured
One option: She said she was showing her backpack. So she could have been holding it in one hand and taking pictures with the other. She could have landed on her front.
Another option: She said she landed on the wall. If her backpack was on and she landed on the wall she then could have rolled to one side and fallen from the wall
I think they planned it
I don't see how the laundromat owner is responsible at all like how neglectful do you have to be as a parent that your child is able to climb into a washing machine in the first place
Watch your children!! I agree with Mrs. Clarke.
Get a sitter or leave them with a family member if you cannot control your children. I was a single mom with 4 and they SAT DOWN until or I left them with a sitter when I washed laundry.
I'm surprised that people keep talking about the mother in story 2 and how horrible mother she was, and nobody about the owner and why she didn't unplug the defective washing machine.
Also as a teacher I can tell you, that you can have children RIGHT IN FRONT OF YOU, and they will still do something crazy in those 10-30 seconds you were not looking at them.
She said you can’t just unplug 1 machine
You clearly didn't listen. You can't unplug one
Scars never go away!!
Nope but they can be covered by makeup
They fade overtime and don't look as bad. Shes still so beautiful, however ❤
Gotta watch your kiddos. Especially toddlers... toddlers zip into things their not supposed to be in like the flash. My kid has me looking around like a crackhead sometimes because it only takes a moment for them to seriously hurt themselves, and they don't have the sense to not do things that WE find obvious like for example... CLIMB INTO A FLIPPING WASHER... so be aware, even if you look like a crackhead 😂. It's okay though, that stage can be exhausting sometimes but it's not forever.
24:00 even if the child area is small; as a parent you ALWAYS keep control of your kids. Yes it’s terrible this happened but it would not have if she was watching her children and kept them close.
Watched this a few weeks ago or something
I lost it at that guy's reaction to when the judge ruled in favor of the girl who fell through the railing 😁😁
Looked it up just to see that again. I caught it right at the end on TV now I might watch the full episode.
Why is it her responsibility to have a daycare in a laundromat? She was kind and generous by having a kid center. I’m so confused.
Lol, the mother is such a obj h, she’s crying like this woman shoved her daughter into the machine and locked it.
In the first case the moulage is bad. The owner’s response is incompetent. His railing should not have been so easy to break. A judgment without evidence of permanent impairment of this much is ridiculous.
I love this judge’s demeanor
Not mentioned here.
Did they have business insurance?
Did they follow proper building codes?
Why didn't the owner say something to mom when the business owner saw the children running around and knowing there was a potential danger present?
Why wasn't adequate signage used to inform machine out of order, children must be supervised at all times, children not allowed to play in equipment, not responsible for unsupervised children, laundry rules etc (Big, bold and highly
visible signage) a hand written sign is not adequate.
I agree with the judges decision. There is neglect on both sides
Poor guy he is bankrupt and.probably lost everything
I feel so bad for the Guy 😭😔
❤ YOUR SHOW😊😊😊
Case one i agree totally
Had the mom supervised her child properly this wouldn't happen. You know children get in everything and the younger the more you watch them. The mom is at fault.
That mother is incapable of taking care of her child. They should be sent to foster parents
Always always look before you lean, even if it looks ok! Social media always comes after your safety.... Yes all rooms should be up to code and in a safe condition and if it is not there should be warnings signs and or closed off so nobody could get hurt...
Video #2 Was definitely the moms fault. I have children 5 and under and go to the laundromat too and never have I ever, even as a child myself experienced a babysitter inside them joints. You are 100% responsible for your personal items and children. Seriously there’s signs and notices everywhere you look in them places. Mama need to take accountability, busy or not your children are your responsibility regardless of where you go unless left in someone else’s care.
They ate that man alive, many generations are going to be passed down that debt. I actually feel sorry for this man for his financial burden
I’ve heard that on most of these court shows that the show actually pays the judgement & both the defendant & plaintiff are paid for their appearance. A lot of times people will make up cases knowing win or lose they’ll both get paid.
the ranch was an inheritance. if he had worked hard all his life and sank his life savings, I would feel worse for him
Why would you use a social media star to promote kids staying off their phones..
The second case is honestly just bs tho. I feel terrible for the kid, no way should anyone ever have to go through that. But the thing is, the mother shouldve been the one taking responsibility cuz THATS HER KIDS, she should have kept them close and kept an eye on them. Did she do that? No, cuz if she did then this wouldnt have happened. I dont see how the other lady was 60% responsible for this
She know her kids bad 😂
Mom in Case #2 should be charged with neglect of her child.
Imagine watching your kid inside a laundry machine and not thinking about unplugging it or closing the valve to the water supply...
NeglectFUL parent wins ! Im OUTRAGED!!!
EXACTLY
For the lady who was irresponsible for her child is sick don’t blame the owner for you being irresponsible for your child smh
I’m disgusted by the mother in the 2nd case. I cannot believe she wasn’t watching her kid and got paid. The laundry mat doesn’t offer babysitting!
Not only that but gets on her knees putting up that act after she was awarded all that money. That little girl has medical insurance I’m sure. She didn’t pay a dime.
Judge is insightful and a Smart Man.
😂
Is this personal injury, Court real because I don’t feel like these numbers are correct😅
They are remakes of actual cases
SHE SHOULD HAVE BEEN WATCHING HER KIDS. A million kids go to laundry mats and I've never heard of this. Smh. Plus the sign!!!!!! Start leaving them with a babysitter if they don't listen. Smh. That business should not have to pay.
Wow on mother's day Why!?!?!?!?
12:32
lol did anyone else catch that
daughter “wow wow”
mom “who is that”
daughter 😒
mom *claps* “wow🤨”
Yeh, but who the f is that dude anyway?
Lolll that got me
are these cases real
Modified reenactments based on real cases
as a kid, I was in a car wreck...the car rolled over me, I was left permanently disabled, nearly died several times, missed my entire senior year of high school and spent my early 20's learning to walk again...I got $15,000...cases like this are so hard to watch!! (we had lousy lawyers who were fired from their firm after our case was done for taking money from insurance companies in exchange for getting clients to accept low-ball offers.)
Just because she fell, doesn’t make it someone else’s fault. Geez
she fell because of this man's rail, which he did not mention was rotten or unstable anywhere, and even said the people could go ANYWHERE. You don't expect the things that are meant to keep you safe to be broken and do just the opposite.
He had a faulty rail, it’s his fault.
Yes her fall is absolutely due to his negligence.
She was an invited guest and the property was not well maintained and he should have had signs posted and he should have told her not to go on the balconies ect, so that makes him 100% responsible for her injuries.
How is the average man going to pay them a million dollars? and how does the extra money outside of the medical expenses change anything for them? They’re money hungry
He did not tell her to go upstairs and just told her to take pictures
Problem he said you can take pictures any where in the house so he’s wrong because he know of the danger saying you can go any where in the house is like saying you can go upstairs
@@charliekleiman1165 Right
@@charliekleiman1165what would've saved him a sighn that says "don't lean on rail"
@@AQCE245 No he told her she had free reign
@21:22 --> If that ever happens, is there usually a main switch in close proximity to the machines to shut off the power? Would that have assisted in this instance? Thank you.