Lomo 92

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • Get an exclusive ‪@Surfshark‬ deal! Enter promo code GRAINYDAYS for an extra 3 months
    free at: surfshark.deal...
    prints: graincheck.dar...
    podcast: ‪@mamiyamigos‬
    instagram: @50_shades_of_jason
    tunes: share.epidemics...
    business inquiries: pigmodegraingang@gmail.com
    cameras: nikon f2

ความคิดเห็น • 296

  • @grainydaysss
    @grainydaysss  ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Get an exclusive @Surfshark deal! Enter promo code GRAINYDAYS for an extra 3 months free at: surfshark.deals/grainydays

  • @jaredwood9683
    @jaredwood9683 ปีที่แล้ว +277

    Great video but I don't understand why Jason never explained what the '92 stood for

    • @kleanish
      @kleanish ปีที่แล้ว +4

      90s vibes

    • @winggame008
      @winggame008 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Lomography was founded in 1992

  • @DeeRosa
    @DeeRosa ปีที่แล้ว +306

    Jason’s descent into bitterness toward film is truly a favorite of mine; truly a masterpiece.

    • @funkmon
      @funkmon ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Descent

    • @DeeRosa
      @DeeRosa ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@funkmonthank you.

    • @amosk24
      @amosk24 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      It's an interesting story arc, and I'm rooting for him to find his joy again. Maybe next season?

    • @RM.TokyoPhotographer
      @RM.TokyoPhotographer ปีที่แล้ว

      Long Live Jason 92"

    • @neerajnongmaithem392
      @neerajnongmaithem392 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe when they bring aerochrome back​@@amosk24

  • @wilferrero244
    @wilferrero244 ปีที่แล้ว +256

    Why is Jason filming this from a gulag and not his office?

    • @elleoat
      @elleoat ปีที่แล้ว +11

      he is counter-revolutionary :(

    • @joeldipu6754
      @joeldipu6754 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Imprisoned by the Soviets for bringing foreign made camera lenses 😅

    • @DGJTvlogs
      @DGJTvlogs ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Squarespace found out about the new sponsor and retaliated.

    • @benferris2764
      @benferris2764 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@joeldipu6754he must of brought some photos of america, and they were having none of it.

    • @Noah-lj2sg
      @Noah-lj2sg 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@benferris2764did you write of instead of have?

  • @gray6385
    @gray6385 ปีที่แล้ว +91

    Just the humor, The editing, voice over, and style of these videos makes this some of my favorite stuff on TH-cam to watch.

  • @jonny631
    @jonny631 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hey @grainydays why do they call it Lomo 92’

  • @ds89421
    @ds89421 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Do you know why does it have '92 in the name?

  • @elleoat
    @elleoat ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Nico of Nico's photo news proposed the idea that Lomochrome emulsions (purple, metropolis, and turquoise) are all produced in Germany by Inoviscoat, since they're the only factory in Germany that has the ability to produce color and somewhere those films are listed as "made in Germany"
    This would explain why '92 looks like Orwo's Wolfen NC400, since Orwo's films are also produced by Inoviscoat.

    • @AnthonySchnitzel
      @AnthonySchnitzel ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Plus NC500 is said to be Metropolis and also that new "vintage tone" Ilford color film

    • @elleoat
      @elleoat ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@AnthonySchnitzel I'd be surprised that NC500 and Metropolis are the same emulsion. They look similar but not that similar.

    • @lensman5762
      @lensman5762 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@elleoat The fact remians, that there are very few film manufcaturers in the western world, and even fewer that can produce a colour film. You can safely forget Japan for good. Neither Lomo. nor for that matter Adox manufacture films. Just look at the ' not in stock ' list of their films. Once the master rolls, from whomever have finished so does their ' production ' of film. This just leaves two or three candidates, Kodak/Alaris The Greed Marsters notwithstanding. In anycase, this emulsion wil appeal for a time, to the usual young You Tubers, until their viewers and the themselves get tired of the grain, the cool tones and the price of this novelty film. I'd rather spend my money on something else. Others may have other opinions.

  • @coreymagz3145
    @coreymagz3145 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Lomo 92 makes me nostalgic for eating sandwiches after swimming all day during the summer as a kid.

  • @Spmart5
    @Spmart5 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    It looks a lot like ORWO Wolfen NC500, which is based on AGFA XT 320 emulsion.
    Lomograhy's Lomochrome film supplier is InovisCoat and NC500 is manufactured by InovisCoat - it might be the same film.
    I shot a roll of NC500 and it came out great.

    • @GlaciaDay
      @GlaciaDay ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think NC500 was the newer 2021 version of Metropolis, but this is a bit different i mean. I mean Lomography could not have released metropolis again right? But these 3 do look alike not gonna lie.

    • @tylerpreston95
      @tylerpreston95 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Alright, take it easy

    • @tomjanowski8584
      @tomjanowski8584 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Based on what I see, 92 is definitely not NC500. I didn't like NC500 as it rendered purples and magentas as brown and blues as bluish gray for me.

  • @rozyckicom
    @rozyckicom ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Hey, why is it 92?

  • @ElHype714
    @ElHype714 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The blueish hue and grain leads me to believe Orwo Wolfen NC400, NC500 is a bit more warm. Wolfen doesn’t have a huge market in the U.S. for color films so maybe white-labeling for Lomo makes more sense. Also, just checked and B&H has a really big discount on Orwo Wolfen NC400…

    • @FinalManaTrigger
      @FinalManaTrigger ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, I love the look of these films. Coincidentally, I just bought 5 rolls of Wolfen NC400 yesterday on B&H, couldn't pass up the discount.

  • @mushaboom8695
    @mushaboom8695 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Lomography was founded in ‘92.

    • @keithparker7412
      @keithparker7412 ปีที่แล้ว +16

      But film photography wasn’t around then?

    • @Shrek_Has_Covid19
      @Shrek_Has_Covid19 ปีที่แล้ว +52

      photography was invented in 2014

    • @DeeB1345
      @DeeB1345 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@Shrek_Has_Covid19I thought Instagram invented photography?

    • @xander1052
      @xander1052 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@DeeB1345 nah, 2014 invented it

    • @DeeB1345
      @DeeB1345 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@xander1052 Hell of a guy. Three cheers for 2014!

  • @DecentGatsby
    @DecentGatsby ปีที่แล้ว +5

    *Why is it called ‘92* ?

  • @xagikneex
    @xagikneex ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This stuff is just rebadge orwo 400 which is old Agfa that was produced in the 90’s. Both Polaroid and Konica also sold this film rebadged and it had that same look, even back then

    • @KaptainKerl
      @KaptainKerl หลายเดือนก่อน

      Buying if for the 92

  • @Nijensikkens
    @Nijensikkens ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's ORWO Wolfen NC400 film😊 Lomography and orwo have been working close together bringing back a color film. Lomo Metropolis is just failed color film production from orwo 😋 any it's ORWO NC400 which is a nice start from orwo bringing back color film.

  • @thedondeluxe6941
    @thedondeluxe6941 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    I think a warming filter would go well with this film.

  • @sammoore9273
    @sammoore9273 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Why is it called lomo 92

  • @LaskyLabs
    @LaskyLabs ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I appreciate how cool the film is, especially since Fuji just killed the steadfast Superia 400... It's not what I'm looking for, but real fun looking, I'll admit.

  • @JamesBillingsPhotography
    @JamesBillingsPhotography ปีที่แล้ว +4

    A roll of this turned up yesterday so I'm going to give it a whirl. Stumbled across your channel because of that, and I'm enjoying the "dry" delivery of your opinions 😂

  • @artistjoh
    @artistjoh ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I love that it will come to 110. On 110 it will be grain city, and I love using 110 to exploit the creative potential of grain. Although I have to admit that while I love Metropolis and Orca, I also love the change of shooting Peacock and developing in E6 for finer grain and saturated colors.
    Lomography makes me want to pull my hair out sometimes when dealing with their out-of-stock periods, but I adore the way they make films that artists can care about. And I adore their dedication to 110. I just hope Kodak eventually returns to making 110 again. I used to love Kodak Verichrome 110. I also loved Kodachrome in 110, but I guess that one is never coming back, sadly.

  • @PurpleStormProductions
    @PurpleStormProductions ปีที่แล้ว +2

    New sponsor that’s not SquareSpace or The Darkroom?? Whhhhhaaat, our boy is moving uuuuup!

  • @piketubeman
    @piketubeman ปีที่แล้ว +4

    But wait Jason, why is it called '92? *Chug Chug Chug Chug*

  • @81mpact
    @81mpact ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why do they call it Lomo 92?

  • @97nelsn
    @97nelsn ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wonder if I can find this film stock at my local thrift store for $5

  • @highonblix
    @highonblix ปีที่แล้ว +2

    why is it called lomo 92?

  • @bryceybryceybryce
    @bryceybryceybryce ปีที่แล้ว +9

    mad respect for the Stardew Valley harvest sound at 10:10

    • @jakebower2515
      @jakebower2515 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you I thought I recognized that sound and it was bothering me

  • @Pushed_Portra
    @Pushed_Portra ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Not sure I’d use it but new film stocks are always welcome!

  • @JaimeGFX
    @JaimeGFX ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i kinda really liked the auto warm, but then again i def lean on the warmer side of photos

  • @SohNatan
    @SohNatan ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Love the video! Just one question tho: WHY IS IT CALLED LOMO 92?

    • @SISSI_LU
      @SISSI_LU ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s the year that Lomography was established. This is the film that they released to celebrate their 30th anniversary.

  • @cypherzero1262
    @cypherzero1262 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    would that be rebranding 200T? And using 400 as under exposed in creating that amount of noise?

  • @marving1416
    @marving1416 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    They should've call it Lomo Retro '62 because these pictures look like they were taken in the 1960's. Which is not a bad thing.

  • @tobyslayter5562
    @tobyslayter5562 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    i must admit i saw the news to 92 on Reddit and thought how funny the people are ofer there , But after seeing these example picutres of you Jason i Definitly get my hand on some rolls , thanks for your work and your amazing pictures

  • @cborel83
    @cborel83 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Best thing you ever did was showing the differences and setting in NLP. Fillm stocks can look so different when reviewed based on those

  • @paul_engelhardt
    @paul_engelhardt ปีที่แล้ว +4

    it looks a bit like Orwo Nc500 (maybe NC400?), and Lomo has already repackaged other Orwo film stocks in the past, so it doesn't seem too far-fetched.

    • @JLeoH
      @JLeoH ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Looks completely different!

    • @FinalManaTrigger
      @FinalManaTrigger ปีที่แล้ว

      Looks like NC400, which is a good thing.

  • @JamieMPhoto
    @JamieMPhoto ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I would get a Lomography tattoo for 8x10 92.

  • @andydreadsbmx
    @andydreadsbmx ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Looks like a film I will stray away from, not fitting my fancy not just from what you captured but from what I saw elsewhere as well.

  • @jack2005y
    @jack2005y ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks very similar to remjet removed 200t 5213 which others were sold as 320T

  • @VariTimo
    @VariTimo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great a new film! With Grainydays pictures in post stamp size on my iPhone 13 mini. Also why is it called ‘92?

  • @lucafilms
    @lucafilms ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I‘m a newbie so sorry for the question. Jason said the footage he saw seemed underexposed. So to me - if I learned this correctly - that means he would be better off with overexposing, ergo PUSHING the film. But he pulls it, doesn‘t he? Why? Can anyone explain?

  • @n15ah92
    @n15ah92 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Loved the video as always. But why the helle did they name it "Lomo 92"? What kinda name is this

  • @JuanHurrea
    @JuanHurrea ปีที่แล้ว +1

    " _Today I'm shooting my Nikon f2 Titan adapted to a Leica Sl lens with a Nikon F to Minolta MD to a Leica SL back to a Nikon F mount adapter because I'm goofy like that_ " - Jason 2023

  • @Benjaminjohansson93
    @Benjaminjohansson93 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Not a big fan of this film from what ive seen so far. But speaking of lomo, how is the "regular" lomo 400 film? Havent tried it but not a lot of people speak of it, only lomo800 but 400 seem to be good too or am i wrong?

  • @Dan_Mirai
    @Dan_Mirai ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chug a flamin hot mountain dew why is it named Lomo 92?
    Where do you get your endless supply of Flamin Hot Mountain Dew? I love that shit

  • @sacrificialobama8786
    @sacrificialobama8786 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    this is a truly uninspiring video. love it, keep em coming

  • @sdcorrey
    @sdcorrey ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Seems darker than usual, I wonder if Jason got the email that FPP is down to the very last of the Retrochrome before he shot this?

  • @MichaelCortese1
    @MichaelCortese1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jason what is your review of using the Leica R 35-70 on the F2? Worth the conversion? I've been shooting it on my digital Nikon Z and it's probably my favorite lens

  • @VariTimo
    @VariTimo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Color films are stacked Blue Green Red. If it was another order you wouldn’t get accurate colors like with Red Scale. Blue halation is super rare and only happens with certain light sources. It’s most likely just the lens.

  • @Sam-em1ic
    @Sam-em1ic ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Blue and grainy, just like my special places

  • @seiwonko1162
    @seiwonko1162 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    So great to see a new color film and it looks fantastic

  • @pranavmeno
    @pranavmeno ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Boy you can really feel the Edward Hopper in these... awesome stuff as always, excited to try Lomo '92 myself!

  • @pdtech4524
    @pdtech4524 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Definitely a 'cool blue' vibe going on with Lomo '92.👍

  • @LordHelmet5021
    @LordHelmet5021 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    tbh i really what I've seen from this stock. It's like instant nostalgia for me

  • @Francois_L_7933
    @Francois_L_7933 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This would probably do wonders for showing the bitter reality of the Canadian winters.

  • @mikejankowski6321
    @mikejankowski6321 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    At the risk of inducing more film stock reviews that you don't want to do, WELL DONE! Lots of meaningful insights to be had here. Your destination was intriguing as well, I'll have to go there sometime. Those signs for the pastrami and corned beef are hooking me into a sandwich craving, and I am already having dinner. Some nice images to be sure.
    You two look like you had plenty of fun just chilling with food and film. Great post as always.

  • @FuriosusD06
    @FuriosusD06 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My tip on how to never open the back of a camera on film ?
    If a camera is empty I flip the rewind lever up, even on camera with a film window

  • @mil0931
    @mil0931 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone know why is it named Lomo 92?

  • @tompoynton
    @tompoynton ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Back to 4:3, praise Aerochrome

  • @RHLW
    @RHLW ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do they call it "92"? Whats that all about?

  • @garrettflowers3356
    @garrettflowers3356 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you give us a video telling us why it’s called Lomo 92?

  • @Sakezaf
    @Sakezaf ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is it called Lomo '92? WHY??????

  • @aravindvinayakan
    @aravindvinayakan ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I miss The Grove farmers market, Marconda's has excellent Italian sausage! Great video as always :)

  • @thijskennis8757
    @thijskennis8757 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But why is it called Lomo 92 Jason?

  • @thumperjdm
    @thumperjdm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As Jason gets older and more bitter, his speech is taking on a Christopher Walken-like cadence.
    We need more cowbell. ;-)

  • @JustinRobles13
    @JustinRobles13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great video. One question though, why is it called Lomo 92?

  • @michaelhall3718
    @michaelhall3718 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is this the first time we’ve seen Caleb not eating barbecue? I didn’t know he could consume anything not bathed in smoke for at least 9 hours

  • @michaelruss9604
    @michaelruss9604 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I stuck my head into the Lomo HQ when I was in Vienna recently and it sounds like the film is being made in a factory in Germany. Can't say much more than that but there u go. Looking forward to shooting this in 110!

  • @somephotovideos
    @somephotovideos ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I miss the Farmer's Market at The Grove. I didn't go there too often when I lived in LA but having to move away suddenly made me get all the feels going when watching this video. Ordered a couple rolls of this film - excited to try it out on my QL17 G-III.

  • @AustinLHoward
    @AustinLHoward ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yo @grainydays since you talk to these companies all the time do you have any inside information as to why it's called lomo '92?

  • @jakoblauber
    @jakoblauber ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The look on the videos is so great! Is there a lut? :)

  • @BottleneckMoses
    @BottleneckMoses ปีที่แล้ว +1

    92 is probably the $ price for consumers after general release.

  • @gonnor_cates
    @gonnor_cates ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always knew Jason was a baseball fan

  • @nicklanders5178
    @nicklanders5178 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why do you think it’s called lomo ‘92?

  • @sawyerbush9581
    @sawyerbush9581 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jason, why is it called Lomo ‘92??

  • @LesterBeasley
    @LesterBeasley ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like it has some significant grain. At least in a couple of shots.

  • @KentTeffeteller
    @KentTeffeteller ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I look forward to some new grainy days content, and good stuff to shoot. Glad to see you showing some Nikon F2 love!

  • @VacatedData
    @VacatedData ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey dude if you are uninspired rn take a break for yourself, burnout can be a killer to channels and we would all be okay with you taking a two or three week break for yourself

  • @DogsandFilm
    @DogsandFilm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I saw this video after smoking some marihuana and it was the best decision ever.

  • @darrengodssonfielding
    @darrengodssonfielding ปีที่แล้ว

    I really wish he would explain why it's called 'Lomo 92' I mean , thats the entire reason I clicked on the video. Not because I wanted to see some cool film photos or hear Jason's incredible dry, sarcastic monologues. Nope

  • @DEFilmProductions
    @DEFilmProductions ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How do you think this film would fair in daylight with a warming filter like an 85B?

  • @trippwilsonphoto
    @trippwilsonphoto ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why is it called lomo '92?

  • @alessandromercatelli2225
    @alessandromercatelli2225 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This film stock slaps, you make me wanna try it asap

  • @modepush
    @modepush ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what lens are you using on the f2?

  • @jameslenney
    @jameslenney 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why is it called Lomo ‘92?

  • @lukasvanderlende
    @lukasvanderlende ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always a good every other Thursday of dry humor and slight disdain for a art form we love

  • @just_a_guy
    @just_a_guy ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what makes you decide to shoot square video sometimes vs 16:9 or 18:9? just curious. good video btw mate

    • @TheChosenOne_
      @TheChosenOne_ ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Video aspect ratio = aspect ratio of the pictures

    • @just_a_guy
      @just_a_guy ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheChosenOne_ that’s what i figured cause the xpan videos are the 18:9 i think. thanks!

  • @tlm2096
    @tlm2096 ปีที่แล้ว

    Didn’t know Flaming Hot Mountain Dew could give a 30-year-old alopecia. Nice hat though.

  • @wheyisolate3410
    @wheyisolate3410 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Babe wake up new grainydays video just dropped

  • @Spnwax
    @Spnwax ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is it called Lomo 92? 😏

  • @DMTStokes
    @DMTStokes ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey thanks Jason. Just in time for my layover today

  • @cjcaves4290
    @cjcaves4290 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    why is it called lomo 92

  • @RickMahoney2013
    @RickMahoney2013 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did you have any of the photos printed to 8x10 and was there still a lot of grain ?

  • @don8635
    @don8635 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My God, this stock looks awful

  • @314rate2
    @314rate2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    must not ask why…,must not ask why..

  • @BrandonPrive1432
    @BrandonPrive1432 ปีที่แล้ว

    Lomography needs to lower its prices, i get it, all film prices are climbing, but there needs to be that company that says fuck it and makes it work, somehow flicfilm can produce film for under 13 bucks canadian a roll. why the hell is lomo 800 $25.96 a roll canadian, thats worse than Portra prices. they need to get that shit under control.

  • @HOUSCOUS
    @HOUSCOUS ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is called Lomo '92?

  • @matheushenriquenascimento9461
    @matheushenriquenascimento9461 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why is called Lomo '92?

  • @henry2941
    @henry2941 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is that effect he always does at the end where he zooms into the image but it looks like it’s got layers of depth between the foreground and background.
    It’s been driving me crazy I can’t remember it.

  • @pizzapiglet
    @pizzapiglet ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm still riding a tricycle in the fast lane of photography, so help me understand why would you shoot film and then scan it. It seems extra masochistic for a hobby that already brings me no joy?.

  • @felicecleveland4288
    @felicecleveland4288 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looks like it expired in 92'