Ansible vs. Terraform: What's the difference?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 พ.ค. 2024
  • Explore guide to Terraform → ibm.biz/guide-to-terraform
    Explore guide to Infrastructure as Code → ibm.biz/guide-to-iac
    Watch "Terraform Explained" lightboard video → • Terraform Explained
    Watch "What is Ansible?" lightboard video → • What is Ansible?
    Watch "What is Infrastructure as Code?" → • What is Infrastructure...
    ► Check out IBM Cloud Schematics → ibm.biz/schematics
    ► Check out IBM Cloud Satellite → ibm.biz/prod-satellite
    ► Check out IBM Cloud Paks → ibm.biz/product-cloud-paks
    Ansible and Terraform are both great tools that you can turn to for creating Infrastructure as Code (IaC) which can be used to deploy repeatable environments for automating your infrastructure. However, what is the difference between the two? When should you pick one over the other?
    In this lightboard video, Sai Vennam with IBM Cloud, dives deep into how Ansible and Terraform both serve different purposes as well as complement each other for automating infrastructure.
    Earn a badge with FREE interactive Kubernetes labs → ibm.biz/interactive-k8-learning
    Get started on IBM Cloud at no cost → ibm.biz/cloud-free-acct
    Subscribe to the IBM Cloud channel to be notified when a new video drops → ibm.biz/subscribe-now
    #Ansible #Terraform #ITAutomation
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 90

  • @shyamutty
    @shyamutty 3 ปีที่แล้ว +132

    Similarities: supports templating, open source, agentless (plug and play), infrastructure as a code, provisioning infrastructure
    Terraform: primary use as infrastructure provisioning tool, declarative (define what end result you want), state management, new and evolving
    Ansible: primary use as configuration tool, hybrid, no lifecycle management
    We can both as complementary:
    * Start with Terraform: use Terraform to spin up an infrastructure, once infra is ready, use Terraform to call Ansible to do config management on the resources you spun up.
    * Start with Ansible: in Step1 of playbook: call Terraform to spin up infra and then pick up where Terraform leaves off, take that infra and run the Ansible actions on that

    • @cyclonus01
      @cyclonus01 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      you da real MVP

  • @AbdullahOllivierreIT
    @AbdullahOllivierreIT หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here’s a summary of the key differences and synergies between Terraform and Ansible as explained in the TH-cam video:
    1. Purpose and Functionality:
    • Terraform is primarily used for provisioning infrastructure in a declarative manner, allowing users to define what the infrastructure should look like and then automatically managing the creation process to match that definition.
    • Ansible excels in configuration management and application deployment. It can also provision infrastructure, but it operates in a more procedural/hybrid manner, where actions are executed in the order they are defined.
    2. Operational Method:
    • Terraform operates declaratively, automatically handling dependencies and order of operations, which means it can execute tasks in an optimized sequence based on resource dependencies.
    • Ansible is more procedural, where tasks are run in the sequence they are written, though it supports declarative elements. This requires careful planning of task order to ensure operations are performed correctly.
    3. State Management and Idempotency:
    • Terraform tracks the state of the infrastructure and applies changes incrementally to avoid re-provisioning resources that are already in the desired state. This state management also allows Terraform to remove resources when their definitions are deleted from the configuration.
    • Ansible does not track state in the same way, so lifecycle changes need to be manually managed. While Ansible tasks can be made idempotent, this is not automatic and must be explicitly designed into the playbooks.
    4. Community and Extensions:
    • Both tools boast strong community support and extensive libraries of modules or playbooks that facilitate quick setup and integration with various technologies. Terraform has the Terraform Registry, and Ansible has Ansible Galaxy.
    5. Integration and Usage Together:
    • The two tools are complementary when used together within an automation workflow. Terraform can be used to provision the initial infrastructure, which can then be managed and configured by Ansible, integrating their strengths for a robust automation strategy.
    This explanation highlights that while Terraform and Ansible have some overlapping capabilities, they each have unique strengths that make them suitable for different aspects of infrastructure automation.

  • @DaveOtteman
    @DaveOtteman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thanks Sai. Great presentation. You do a great job of explaining these complex topics in an understandable way. Cheers!

  • @aamirprincedjearam8817
    @aamirprincedjearam8817 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I love how whenever Sai hosts a Vs. video, he always starts by saying they are complementary tools

  • @mstevensn50
    @mstevensn50 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Awesome explanation I really appreciate you going over the differences between Terraform and Ansible.

  • @vasudevadernierstuff
    @vasudevadernierstuff 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    good to know that we could really work together combining Ansible and terraform

  • @satishsindiri713
    @satishsindiri713 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liked it very much. Helps a layman like me to understand the concepts. Keep doing more of it

  • @StevenJSMin
    @StevenJSMin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It was a good explanation that reminded me of what I knew and what I am currently doing. I totally agree with the opinion that Ansible and Terraform can be used together. However, in reality, if our colleague have enough experience with these two scripts, there will be no problem, I am a little curious as to whether there will be sensibility when considering the learning cost. Thanks, Sai

  • @michaelmcgillivray2485
    @michaelmcgillivray2485 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video as always Sai! I love your style of breaking down seemingly complex topics like this into easily digestible tidbits. IBM / Red Hat is lucky to have you as an architect / engineer.

  • @AnjalySB
    @AnjalySB ปีที่แล้ว

    Great presentation!

  • @davidsalleyezonme1283
    @davidsalleyezonme1283 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation good job @IBM Technology

  • @kristopherleslie8343
    @kristopherleslie8343 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy is clear and methodical

  • @nischalreddy27
    @nischalreddy27 23 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Great explanation

  • @JamesJSwiftJay
    @JamesJSwiftJay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This channel is a pillar of knowledge for people who want to understand infrastructure. It has helped me greatly, thank you for sharing your knowledge.

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to be of help, James! Thank you for watching! 👍

  • @MsRen2009
    @MsRen2009 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great info from the layman term & a newbies started to know about all these..

  • @SpeedyWinds
    @SpeedyWinds 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice, well explained!!!

  • @angsh
    @angsh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Brilliant! Thank you Sai.

  • @kiddflux
    @kiddflux ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video. Thank you so much

  • @Nobo_On_The_Rocks
    @Nobo_On_The_Rocks ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Terraform has USERDATA, template_file for setting up and running your app too.
    So that necessarily fills the void for configuration management which ansible does

  • @GigiAmorronso
    @GigiAmorronso หลายเดือนก่อน

    many thanks for that comparison!

  • @venkatasunkari7270
    @venkatasunkari7270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent Great presentation

  • @andukz
    @andukz 3 ปีที่แล้ว +36

    Can we appreciate how he writes from the other side of the pane? :)

    • @timweissenfels5353
      @timweissenfels5353 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

      The video is mirrored

    • @lmb_codes
      @lmb_codes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The magic of video editing 🤣

    • @amused_harry
      @amused_harry 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It never gets old

  • @rajithkumar3424
    @rajithkumar3424 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice presentation

  • @zhentaomi9448
    @zhentaomi9448 ปีที่แล้ว

    good explanation

  • @MisteretsiM101
    @MisteretsiM101 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    great info, im just amazed at the mirrored writing

    • @martinkulik9466
      @martinkulik9466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      so they mirrored the video, from right to left, so his right arm appears left and the text is readable? am I right

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are right! We shared some backstage "secrets" of our videos on the Community page, check it out here 👉
      ibm.co/3pZKqWQ 😉

  • @khaktus
    @khaktus 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    unnecessary confusion:
    the other video for Ansible stated that it is clearly declarative ... here Ansible is hybrid while Terraform is declarative
    Ansible video said A. is good for Provisioning, Config and eventually App deployment ... here Ansible is more for Config and App deployment while Terraform better for Provisioning

  • @donaldkennedy7993
    @donaldkennedy7993 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great comparison :)

  • @JB-mn4ff
    @JB-mn4ff ปีที่แล้ว

    0:41 I usually say, "Terraform is idempotent" which sparks the conversation, "What is that?!" That sets the foundation well. "Declarative" tells only part of the picture. Idempotency isn't mentioned until 6:32, and then in an indirect way re. Ansible modules.

  • @codelucky
    @codelucky 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wish to see a complete DevOps course by IBM Cloud engineers/TH-camrs/Tutors.

    • @mfolarin
      @mfolarin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Edureka has full-length DevOps tutorial. DevOps Journey could be useful for tool-specific explore

    • @loveanimals-0197
      @loveanimals-0197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There's an IBM Training course called QZC50G (DevOps with Private Cloud...). That's the course code. Google it.

  • @tushu24897
    @tushu24897 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That really helped.

  • @safiyyakareem6438
    @safiyyakareem6438 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now I understand the difference between Ansible and Terraform 🚀

  • @Ray_TambaBudol_Marcos
    @Ray_TambaBudol_Marcos 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yet just subscribe, this is powerful stuff.

  • @kihunkim9122
    @kihunkim9122 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I got my RHCSA and studying for RHCE now. What positions are most related to these two cert except for Linux admin? I'm looking for a Linux admin position but there are not many.. so i was thinking maybe learning more skills and search for other positions as well!

  • @KarmaTheory
    @KarmaTheory 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am more interested in, what do you use to make a video like that, like writing on screen stuff!

    • @VVerVVurm
      @VVerVVurm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      aand he is writing left handed _and_ in perfect mirror writing .. I think he is just flexing on us.. ;)

    • @cheapnews1023
      @cheapnews1023 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VVerVVurm it's software rendered idiot

    • @nyny
      @nyny ปีที่แล้ว

      @@VVerVVurm at the 3 minute marked i figured out how he did it haha.. but before that I was thinking, he found his niche and his special value proposition

  • @sandeepsahu1716
    @sandeepsahu1716 ปีที่แล้ว

    How to run the shell scripts in one gofor multiple servers without using ansible..any alternative please

  • @blu3h4t
    @blu3h4t 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @dinh2h
    @dinh2h ปีที่แล้ว

    interesting!

  • @frkntony
    @frkntony 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello, IBM cloud team :). Could you share with us your knowledge about IOPS in the future?

    • @frkntony
      @frkntony 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I come from a soft-dev background. While I know a lot about linux I sure don't know a lot about it's performance & configuration. Recently, I had a case where IOPS was slowing down my TeamCity build agent. Mb you could explain IOPS in a nutshell or bind it to another interesting topic. I wonder how many viewers would like to hear about this topic as well. Upvote if you are interested :J.

    • @ftate
      @ftate 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@frkntony Can you elaborate more on your question? IOPS (Input/Output Operations Per Second) is a performance measurement that may be affected by numerous different factors, both hardware and software. Information about how this metric is obtained and/or calculated won't help you improve the performance of any software you're using, IMO. With that in mind, can you provide more background or a "user story" about the information you're interested in?

  • @jackakif
    @jackakif 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice

  • @attilapinter7141
    @attilapinter7141 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really nice, but Ansible is item potent OOTB.

  • @teknikalyfit
    @teknikalyfit 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Ansible can replace Terraform, not vice versa.

    • @abu3ibaadillaah
      @abu3ibaadillaah 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've been using Ansible for nearly 2 years... after being a system administrator on Linux since 1995. Ansible is completely capable of provisioning infrastructure. It is also extremely good at idempotency and allowing you NOT to do that when necessary.
      In my team, Ansible is all we use and need. There is Negative business value in using two such similar tools in a complementary way within one team. Ansible is more than enough.
      I suspect there are Terraform teams out there who have also succeeded.
      Both together is a waste.

  • @Learner-hg4hj
    @Learner-hg4hj 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ansible and Terraform complement each other's deficiencies and can make the impossible installations using automation possible- 100 percent complete...Terraform is the husband and Ansible is the wife - A marriage between IaC and CaC ! One is declarative and other imperative...and they are both cooperative ...and collaborative.. Two Robust tools that can accomplish something to perfection ! They are indivisible ! Terraform builds the house and ansible added hue and color to it

  • @shubhamraghuwanshi2197
    @shubhamraghuwanshi2197 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Looking for jobs in IBM please help me to get.

  • @khaktus
    @khaktus 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    unnecessary confusion:
    the same for idempotency: Ansible video states idempotency is one of its basic characteristics, here it is actually Terraform that is idempotent automatically, while with Ansible one has to watch over it to ensure it and not to make multiple actions on the infrastructure ??? !!!

  • @basicfit287
    @basicfit287 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude is the Bob Ross of Tech

  • @benpracht2655
    @benpracht2655 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you learn to write in reverse?

    • @bultvidxxxix9973
      @bultvidxxxix9973 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You write normal and then mirror the video.

  • @ruvasqm
    @ruvasqm 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how does he write? Can someone explain what is going on?

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      See ibm.biz/write-backwards

  • @nandap9451
    @nandap9451 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good one ..
    Recommended 1.5x

  • @owenzmortgage8273
    @owenzmortgage8273 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    PPT, everyone doing ppt, not on clear board, we can’t see that well.

  • @genericdeveloper3966
    @genericdeveloper3966 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I didn't like using Ansible because when it fails it often just hangs and doesn't tell me anything.

  • @LNVACVAC
    @LNVACVAC 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I looked at the title and wondered if I was in Ender's universe.

  • @JivanPal
    @JivanPal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the captioner: It's "idempotent", not "item potent".

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you so much for catching that! We just updated it in the closed captions.

  • @cjbidwell
    @cjbidwell ปีที่แล้ว

    Wait a sec, are you writing backwards here?? haha! Very cool presentation

  • @hansvetter8653
    @hansvetter8653 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Alright ... Terraform for provisioning ... and ... Ansible for configuration ...
    But the real need for both begins only with the need to replicate ... ! ... automatically ... ! ...

  • @thecloudterminal
    @thecloudterminal ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this amazing content

  • @chamini2
    @chamini2 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is he writing backwards?

  • @igadgetuzgaming
    @igadgetuzgaming 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍

  • @frkntony
    @frkntony 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    IaC is so hot.

  • @andiidoode
    @andiidoode 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "not necessarily" doesn't make for a clear explanation. Could you put " configuration management" into context?

  • @loupax
    @loupax 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry, got distracted wondering how they do the "write in reverse" trick

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No need to get distracted. 😉 Here's how we do it 👉 ibm.co/3DtdHiF

  • @maikelfm9520
    @maikelfm9520 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm so confused at how was this video made?

    • @maciejbrzeski9740
      @maciejbrzeski9740 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think he just wrote on glass, and they just mirrored the video before publishing it. He is wearing a plain black shirt on purpose, so it is hard to notice. It's just my guess, though. EDIT: this setup is called Lightboard, look it up :)

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're right! 😉 We shared some backstage "secrets" of our videos on the Community page, check it out here 👉
      ibm.co/3iL1azl

  • @pyalgoGPT
    @pyalgoGPT ปีที่แล้ว

    Bible of IaC in 10 mins ... Should be the video template...

  • @OMKARKULKARNIorkul1991
    @OMKARKULKARNIorkul1991 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It’s glass he stood at correct location what u see is illusion

    • @IBMTechnology
      @IBMTechnology  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      See ibm.biz/write-backwards

  • @dmitriminaev
    @dmitriminaev 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    "declarative is awesome because on this step we created some DBs..." Doesn't sound convincing enough. I still can't understand what makes you sacrifice all those loops and conditionals if a programming language in favor of very dubious advantages of declarative description AND re-implement loops and conditionals in an especially awkward way, like 'count' in TF. After all, all that 'declarativeness' is just visibility that hides a normal imperative approach. 'Programming' in YAML/HCL/JSON/whatever is much more difficult than using a DSL to write idempotent scripts without sacrificing anything. The Chef approach is superior to that of Ansible and TF, IMHO.
    As for TF's ability to destroy resources by simply deleting them from a module, it's provided by storing all actions in the state file, not by TF being allegedly declarative, I think. If Ansible or Chef saved their earlier actions, they would be able to roll them back

  • @manzo4581
    @manzo4581 ปีที่แล้ว

    You might want to fix your eng(US) subtitles, it's "idempotency" he's talking about, no such thing as "item potency"

  • @owenzmortgage8273
    @owenzmortgage8273 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not a good PPT, not a good idea to handwriting on clear panel.

  • @dledgerxyz2531
    @dledgerxyz2531 ปีที่แล้ว

    There is zero need for ansible if you already use terraform. I repeat, ZERO. This ridiculous bloath is the reason why companies are slashing workers today.
    To be fair to ansible, I would regard the approach as that of apple OR android not apple AND android

  • @owenzmortgage8273
    @owenzmortgage8273 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just do a PPT, it is terrible for people to see what you want to present because your handwringing on a clear glass is mess, not fancy at all, don’t cut corner just do a professional PPT