Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible vs Saltstack | Configuration Management Tools | DevOps Tools | Simplilearn

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 134

  • @SimplilearnOfficial
    @SimplilearnOfficial  ปีที่แล้ว +1

    🔥Professional Certificate Program in Cloud Computing and DevOps (India Only) - www.simplilearn.com/cloud-computing-devops-course?TVNCTK808I&Comments&TH-cam
    🔥DevOps Engineer Master's Program - www.simplilearn.com/devops-engineer-masters-program-certification-training?TVNCTK808I&Comments&TH-cam
    🔥Caltech - Post Graduate Program in DevOps - www.simplilearn.com/pgp-devops-certification-training-course?TVNCTK808I&Comments&TH-cam

  • @andywong2135
    @andywong2135 5 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    11:48 SSH is Secure SHell, not secure socket hashing

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Hi Andy, SSH is also called Secure Shell or Secure Socket Shell, which is a network protocol that gives users, particularly system administrators, a secure way to access a computer over an unsecured network.

    • @theusernameyoudidntexpect6511
      @theusernameyoudidntexpect6511 5 ปีที่แล้ว +33

      Never have I ever heard it referred to as "secure socket hash". Its Wikipedia page doesn't even include the word 'hash', likely because it makes little-to-no sense in describing its function. Honestly, it sounds more like jargon someone made up to sound like they knew what they were talking about...

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for your feedback. You can check out this link for more clarity on SSH: searchsecurity.techtarget.com/definition/Secure-Shell

    • @rohitrajkumar1234
      @rohitrajkumar1234 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @Charle MIJ not really :)

    • @mjsp8
      @mjsp8 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@SimplilearnOfficial so it doesn't stand for secure socket hashing then, like you said.

  • @UtpalBhattacharjee
    @UtpalBhattacharjee 5 ปีที่แล้ว +83

    Now both Ansible and Saltstack are available in AWS.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes! You are right about that!

    • @Mac-pluto
      @Mac-pluto 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Also Azure and GCP

    • @서기옥-x8g
      @서기옥-x8g 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes. But It's a non-managed service. It needs to configure the EC2.

    • @ninetouch9196
      @ninetouch9196 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mac Sc don't care about those two

    • @zavierarthur1589
      @zavierarthur1589 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      instablaster

  • @mzs114
    @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Salt all the way! Have used ansible since 1.7 and last was 2.x, until I discovered salt. The speed of execution and flexibility of salt just blew me away!

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your input!

    • @belipipi
      @belipipi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Definitely agreed, Ansible is good for noobs, but when you wanna do serious things go for Salt.
      I worked with both and I will never go back to that Ansible hell ...

  • @albertogonzalezmesas810
    @albertogonzalezmesas810 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Firstly, thanks for the video. In my opinion, Ansible is on the top. Easy for setting up, a lot of modules and if you want, make your own modules in easy coding like is python. No master-client arquitecture and tower or AWX like GUI. Pull and push working mode. The best

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching the video and also for the tips!

    • @mzs114
      @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Until you have event based requirement, then Ansible is rigid. Salt kills it in this area.

  • @es3t
    @es3t 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    11:15 author should take notice that Ansible is available and was in cloud providers such as AWS , also Azure and also GCP

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Konrad, thanks for sharing your feedback. We will look into that!

  • @shiva5741
    @shiva5741 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The way of explaining with animations is awesome

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, thank you for appreciating our work. We are glad to have helped. Do check out our other tutorial videos and subscribe to us to stay connected. Cheers :

  • @elib2429
    @elib2429 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It should be noted for Puppet environments, the master node does not push to client nodes, clients PULL configuration catalogs from the master node(and this can be set on intervals)

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching our video and sharing your knowledge.

  • @irascib1e
    @irascib1e 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Saltstack doesn't use SSH for communication. The controller opens a port that the agents on each node connect to and the controller publishes commands through that port.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching our video and sharing your thoughts. Do subscribe to our channel and stay tuned for more. Cheers!

  • @wolfflighttzw
    @wolfflighttzw 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    The comments about SaltStack requiring Minion client install are not accurate. Currently Salt-ssh requires absolutely no minion (client) installation.

  • @habs249
    @habs249 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Enjoying the very Alan Partridge voiceover. Thank you!

  • @ramprasad_v
    @ramprasad_v 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I didn't know that Ruby was used in chef & puppet. I will learn Ruby & excel with the two tools. Thanks 👍

  • @neild4620
    @neild4620 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video, summed up everything I needed to know.

  • @besrabasant
    @besrabasant 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Btw... If you want to do advanced stuffs with Ansible, you can Python

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, it is possible. Thanks for sharing your insights.

  • @francisconavarro3890
    @francisconavarro3890 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ansible and Puppet Bolt are available in the Microsoft Azure Cloud Shell

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for watching our video and sharing the info!

  • @pjguibord
    @pjguibord 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Need to update this vid- great details, a great deal of it is out of date.

  • @aneelysis
    @aneelysis 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When comparing the 4 solutions, what is your criteria for determining "Ease of Setup" and "Management"? Why is it easier to setup and manage Ansible vs the others? How are you determining that?

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ease of setup is the effort required in installing and configuring the tool on your system. Management refers to writing your configuration files that will manage the node systems. Ansible is easiest to setup mainly as it's clientless and easy to manage, as the code is written in YAML.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your valuable input!

    • @aneelysis
      @aneelysis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @J W I've worked with Ansible and fairly familiar with it, I just was curious to know what the criteria that is being used when talking about "Ease of Setup" and "Management". Most people have would use a decision matrix to identify the guidelines that helped make the decision.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Since ansible is client-less, its easy to setup. Playbooks make management of ansible much easier.

  • @sirius4k
    @sirius4k 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I went from only having heard about Ansible and being able to proficiently provision Windows/Linux endpoints in a couple of months, so I'll give my vote for Ansible. Their documentation is very good, not perfect. I checked how Puppet configuration blocks or tasks look like, compared to Ansible, and I didn't like that at all. By using these tools, you are looking to easily manage a large number of endpoints, Puppet seems to go the other way in that regard.
    Edit: Oh, and no Agents, which is the best.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for watching our video and sharing your thoughts. Do subscribe to our channel and stay tuned for more. Cheers!

  • @mzs114
    @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Tbh, except for a few points, this was pretty superficial comparison. For instance agent based tools will work across networks restrictions. And event driven automation of salt. I don't think any of the other tools have this. Also salt has SSH b
    Push based feature too.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, thank you for watching our video and for the honest feedback. We will definitely look into this. Do subscribe, like and share to stay connected with us. Cheers :)

    • @mzs114
      @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SimplilearnOfficial Yeah, looks like Puppet is also introducing event driven automation from June 2020. Please do search around.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, we will look into that.

  • @ChrisChris-jh7uy
    @ChrisChris-jh7uy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great stuff! But could you please give an example of "advanced tasks" you mentioned when you discussed the cons of Puppet/ Chef using Ruby?

  • @learnaddict8994
    @learnaddict8994 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Now Ansible does has integration with AWS, Azure and GCP. Also with various various Network and Security vendors

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your input. Do show your love by subscribing to our channel using this link: th-cam.com/users/Simplilearn and don't forget to hit the like button as well. Cheers!

  • @sabestek8896
    @sabestek8896 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good..
    thx much for the lesson.
    quick question..
    where does vagrant and openstack fit in all this as part of the devops toolbox .?

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Hi,
      OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter. While Vagrant is a tool for building and distributing development environments. Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments."

  • @1MartinArmy
    @1MartinArmy ปีที่แล้ว

    I would say SSH is a "Secure Shell".

  • @n1cl4s
    @n1cl4s 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    As far as I know Ansible is available on AWS.

  • @SimplilearnOfficial
    @SimplilearnOfficial  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Do you have any questions on this topic? Please share your feedback in the comment section below and we'll have our experts answer it for you. Thanks for watching the video. Cheers!

  • @ITSecurityLabs
    @ITSecurityLabs 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great explanation. Thanks

  • @easyappscompany
    @easyappscompany 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Best Regards From Mexico City. Manuel Silva

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, Manuel.
      Also, subscribe to our channel and stay tuned for more videos. Cheers!

  • @yevgenyzamsky1558
    @yevgenyzamsky1558 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ansible uses WinRM to interact with Windows machines, as far as I know.

  • @lindhe
    @lindhe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great overview! Thanks!

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey Andreas, thank you for appreciating our work. We are glad to have helped. Do check out our other tutorial videos and subscribe to us to stay connected. Cheers :)

  • @MrChaos2peace
    @MrChaos2peace 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Since when Puppet was easy to setup? I find it very resource dependent and needing a tons of troubleshooting for the comm between Master -> Agent to be seamless b4 even the first proper CM runs. I am leaning more towards Ansible now, its already RHAT owned and a yum installs it.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As compared to Ansible, Puppet setup is definitely not as simple. Anyways, thanks for your thoughts!

    • @mzs114
      @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Checkout salt befor deciding on DSL based tools like chef/puppet. Ansible users will experience the power of event driven automation with salt!

  • @theadmin1982
    @theadmin1982 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You need to update your video as Ansible is available in AWS.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for bringing that to our notice. We'll have that fixed in our next update Thank you for watching!

  • @tigrangevorgyan3584
    @tigrangevorgyan3584 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Guys, thanks a lot for this video. It was really useful for me :)

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey Tigran, thank you for appreciating our work. We are glad to have helped. Do check out our other tutorial videos and subscribe to us to stay connected. Cheers :)

  • @pedrophsg
    @pedrophsg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for share it!

  • @karendn20
    @karendn20 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What do you mean, "Chef" is a "Knife tool" in communication? It includes both SSL and SSH?

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      You can go for becoming an AWS solutions architect. You can check out this video to learn more: th-cam.com/video/x1hvK80kMmo/w-d-xo.html. Hope that helps!

  • @monocojo9939
    @monocojo9939 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great, thank u

  • @monday6740
    @monday6740 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    6:55 That's a big step backwards ... Having an easy method, like YAML, means it is easy to use, but then isn't very powerful. That's what you get when you don't have a real programming language. Remember : these tools are meant to replace scripts written on servers (CMD batch on Windows and Bash or similar on Linux/Unix). These are no real programming languages as well, but they have lots of logic nevertheless (Windows Powershell even more). In that context, YAML seems like the worst, because it does not seem to have enough logic. It risks being used to just call scripts that do have logic, like Bash, or Perl, or whatever.

    • @dominikbessler2507
      @dominikbessler2507 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Mon Day with saltstack you can write states in pure python with the py renderer

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your input!

  • @ronanluciopereira8800
    @ronanluciopereira8800 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good. Thanks a lot.
    One question I have is which of this tool supports deploying to clients on private networks behind NAT. I mean when you have servers on private networks distributed on different locations

    • @mzs114
      @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I would suggest salt, has yaml not some DSL, but any toll with an agent should work.

  • @Knackiii
    @Knackiii 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i choose saltStack in my team

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's great! So show your love by subscribing to our channel. Cheer!

    • @mzs114
      @mzs114 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I choose salt after 4 years of work with Ansible, it has better model.

  • @pankajmunje2255
    @pankajmunje2255 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent Vedio

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  ปีที่แล้ว

      We're thrilled to have been a part of your learning experience, and we hope that you feel confident and prepared to take on new challenges in your field. If you're interested in further expanding your knowledge, check out our course offerings in the description box.

  • @hiredevops1621
    @hiredevops1621 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    excellent overview! keep going!

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, thank you for appreciating our work. We are glad to have helped. Do check out our other tutorial videos and subscribe to us to stay connected. Cheers :)

  • @shehuidris460
    @shehuidris460 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video 👍

  • @DeepakSharma-iu6wn
    @DeepakSharma-iu6wn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Ansible is also use declarative approach not procedural

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you enjoyed our video! We have a ton more videos like this on our channel. We hope you will join our community!

  • @farizsamanha6051
    @farizsamanha6051 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    nice explanation!!! great

  • @MarceloLunardi
    @MarceloLunardi 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    top man! tyvm!

  • @MaestroCipher
    @MaestroCipher 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:48 Secure socket hashing? Are you sure?

    • @koguma3928
      @koguma3928 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Might have meant Secure Jungle Hashing... where you run through the jungle with a buddy.

    • @MaestroCipher
      @MaestroCipher 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@koguma3928 😂😂😂🌴🌴🌴 to the point!

  • @ahmadpoorgholam8964
    @ahmadpoorgholam8964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    awsome

  • @ruimingxie7171
    @ruimingxie7171 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    could u please share the powerpoint in this video, thank u very much

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi, thanks for watching our video. You can check the slides by clicking here: www.slideshare.net/Simplilearn/chef-vs-puppet-vs-ansible-vs-saltstack-configuration-management-tools-dev-ops-tools-simplilearn-120294258

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Very welcome!

  • @akshayareddykaipu2583
    @akshayareddykaipu2583 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am looking for someone who can help me with the Hyperion installation and configuration using puppet scripts. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

  • @SilentSolution
    @SilentSolution 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice

  • @mansoorahmed2121
    @mansoorahmed2121 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    But puppet also use YAML?

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      YAML is used in Puppet for mainly providing a hierarchy for the data. That's very minimal as compared to how Ansible uses YAML. Happy Learning!

  • @jimmmaximilia2913
    @jimmmaximilia2913 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im learning Powershell DSC..

  • @TheDreamzFactory
    @TheDreamzFactory 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Guys, I am little new to this battle, Does Ansible provide automatic configuration restore for a host? I believe such a thing is possible in chef, Wherein if any host's configuration is diverged let's say manually deleting the package, It will be restored automatically w.r.t its the configuration defined in chef cookbooks.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes, this is provided by all 4 tools. Thanks.

    • @TheDreamzFactory
      @TheDreamzFactory 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@SimplilearnOfficial Could you please let me know this in ansible perspective how it is achieved, Appreciate your response.

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Watch our tutorial on Ansible to get a better understanding of how Ansible achieves everything mentioned here: th-cam.com/video/hlhmQBZjbvk/w-d-xo.html.

  • @puyatecla9903
    @puyatecla9903 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The future of linux is dark, knowledge is fading away people are more interested in Windows-nization, why don't you just make linux a "dockerized app"? or kubernetted one is you prefer

    • @SimplilearnOfficial
      @SimplilearnOfficial  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing your input.
      And yes, we can make deodorized applications: developers.keboola.com/extend/component/docker-tutorial/howto/.

  • @SM-ok3sz
    @SM-ok3sz 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    You pronounce declarative like decorative.