Wow.. This is the most concise and precise antenna lecture, I have ever been come across. If anyone know some better lectures or docs on antenna ..pls comment below. Thanks
Would have been nice to see the areas of the Smith chart being pointed out on the live screen, rather than maximizing the presentation and covering the video.
This was really good and I learnt a lot. It was great to have the doctor's slides shown clearly in another window. Suggestion: if you dropped the slides down and to the right into the space you''ve reserved for the back of bald men's heads, we would be able to see where the doctor was pointing on the screen.
Thank you for the excellent presentation (modulo the inability for us to see the laser pointer on the Smith charts - sigh). Much appreciated! Can you please provide a link to the kit antenna you offered for the citizen science research you mentioned? Also, can you provide the link to the spinning-magnet-on-dremel experiment? It occurs to me that since the FCC seems to have a 9KHz lower lower limit to their regulatory authority AND you mentioned that the transmission could be detected a kilometer away, that there are some interesting opportunities for low bandwidth signaling.
bummer .. wish i knew about the moon mob. that would have been cool.. now got me thinking to do one myself with a few friends.. 73 from 2 land. west side of mass.
I think the presentation is excellent, but I want to caution Hams and those without a physics background that her use of "dipole" is a dipole dealing with two opposite charges. It has nothing to do with a dipole antenna. The dipole antenna is defined as two equal conductive poles or elements in a straight line, generally each 1/4 wave long on each side, fed in the center. I hope the dipole antenna is not confused with the opposing charge dipole used in physics. They are very different things!
I was disappointed with the presentation. Typical example of a person who knows a lot, but the teaching style is to go through the material facts and just name them one after the other and not really explaining anything or very little. Like a review for the same people that already know it all, just to remind them.
So useless. Most of the time you don't see what she is explaining on the board. So you can't follow and can't understand. Why didn't you just record the presentation on the board? Fail!
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
This is such a good talk, Dr Kiersten such a good speaker.
Wow..
This is the most concise and precise antenna lecture, I have ever been come across.
If anyone know some better lectures or docs on antenna ..pls comment below.
Thanks
what do you though could be from MIT ? , only the best !!!!
Would have been nice to see the areas of the Smith chart being pointed out on the live screen, rather than maximizing the presentation and covering the video.
This was really good and I learnt a lot. It was great to have the doctor's slides shown clearly in another window. Suggestion: if you dropped the slides down and to the right into the space you''ve reserved for the back of bald men's heads, we would be able to see where the doctor was pointing on the screen.
bravo...thanks for very complete discussion ...
Thank you! I greatly appreciate you uploading this video. I'm excited also about your upcoming project.
Thank you for the excellent presentation (modulo the inability for us to see the laser pointer on the Smith charts - sigh). Much appreciated!
Can you please provide a link to the kit antenna you offered for the citizen science research you mentioned? Also, can you provide the link to the spinning-magnet-on-dremel experiment? It occurs to me that since the FCC seems to have a 9KHz lower lower limit to their regulatory authority AND you mentioned that the transmission could be detected a kilometer away, that there are some interesting opportunities for low bandwidth signaling.
Thank you for the excellent presentation
"we want a higher", not "we wanna hire" 33:16
bummer .. wish i knew about the moon mob. that would have been cool.. now got me thinking to do one myself with a few friends.. 73 from 2 land. west side of mass.
Echo of antenna in warfare story about the original values verified on my phone
I think the presentation is excellent, but I want to caution Hams and those without a physics background that her use of "dipole" is a dipole dealing with two opposite charges. It has nothing to do with a dipole antenna.
The dipole antenna is defined as two equal conductive poles or elements in a straight line, generally each 1/4 wave long on each side, fed in the center.
I hope the dipole antenna is not confused with the opposing charge dipole used in physics. They are very different things!
Thanks, great talk.
Great talk - Thankyou!
:-)
WOW!
thanks for this lecture
Cool 😎
Dimpu and deep sea
🌹🌹🌹💐
*errffff* *!!!!*
EMF!
I was disappointed with the presentation. Typical example of a person who knows a lot, but the teaching style is to go through the material facts and just name them one after the other and not really explaining anything or very little. Like a review for the same people that already know it all, just to remind them.
All of that throat clearing is very disturbing.
So useless. Most of the time you don't see what she is explaining on the board. So you can't follow and can't understand. Why didn't you just record the presentation on the board? Fail!
Speech dwindles into monotonous mumbling.