Agreed - what a massive difference in attitude, selling the firm in the best possible way, explaining the various price ranges and sizes, doing a superb marketing job with no bad "what are you doing" attitude. OK, I don't have £750,000 let alone £3+ Million, but he redeemed that company in 2-3 minutes compared to the "we insist" drone owner (perhaps having his Health and Safety head screwed on tight!!) Security guard and hidden SIA card seemed quite a lot more reasonable at the end, despite the attitude several staff were showing initially without knowing, not caring about the limits of what they can expect, demand or request, just blundering about like a bull in a china shop, making ridiculous claims about what is needed, what's not allowed and why they felt private land stopped any access or recording about what may be visible. Amazing degree of patience and calmness shown to hold back from saying "nothing you can do to stop me" which might have been my reaction, had I been faced by those initial staff members, assuming they had the ability to prevent someone doing a legal activity (ignoring their unsupported expectations of doing what they wished, and meekly conforming to their silly demands).
You see the same thing at most companies, the management usually have a lack of intelligence and common sense compared with the lower staff, higher education doesn't equal intelligence, its just collecting and remembering data to gain a degree. Ive met people who earn millions and cant change a bayonet light bulb. This is the reason most staff at a company know whats going wrong and can see what needs changing to make staff happy but management cant figure it out because they're too lazy and important to leave their desk, this equals high staff turnover and poor customer service
The brokenheaded logic from them of "It's fine that our security guard is hiding his SIA licence" but also thinking they're entitled to your operator ID, insurance etc.
Its NOT broken-headed logic as you rather patronisingly state- its Lack of information- and knowledge. Plus territoriality that is embedded in the behavior of ALL of us- especially regarding , your place of work OR your Home- The Brokenheads, are the folks who know they are riling people and continue doggedly to do so, while being deliberately vague, and as the Older Heavyset guy said,and i wish he had made DJE squirm a lot more- when he pointed out the sheer cheek and hypocrisy of someone probing and being an absolutely nosy busybody for the sake of a bank balance every week or month- He could easily find Less Combative work if he was,in any way responsive to reasonable questions. He is just Sarcastic, dry- and Evasive.
Never ceased to be amazed by the number of people prepared to spout absolute rubbish....whilst believing they are knowledgeable and aware of the law. In reality, they look very, very silly.
🤔... Yes, right, however, everyone does that really, don't they? ... Very few people are actually experts at anything, even the job they are doing! ... The phrase: "A littlr knowledge is a dangerous thing!" comes to mind, so that's why they will call "the authorities", who will then REALLY muddy the waters! ( but spout THEIR person opinions, yet in a very authoritative and pretend-knowledgeable way! ) 🤣🤪
@@ItsEasyJustLiftYou are mistaken on the right to use airspace, you are confusing the rights to build on your land to a height rather than use of airspace by an aircraft in this case a drone.
@@ItsEasyJustLift Wrong, your research was too hasty. The restrictions applying to upper and lower strata apply to overhanging trees, or structures such as signs or cranes, not to drones. DJE's drone is sub-250g. Crowds cannot be overflown. It cannot be flown at altitudes above 400 ft, but can be flown as low as the operator wants. There is a restriction on horizontal distance from buildings, but not on vertical distance. Airspace above private property is controlled by the CAA, not by the owner, so no trespass.
@@keithpop3097 - 🤠Right! ... and that ownership extends right out of Earth's atmosphere, and into space, as far as the end of the universe! ... ( my uncle's friend's wife's husband has a cousin that works at Nasa! ... So I'm VERY well informed of that fact! ) 🤣
Ah people who know drone (and photography) law because their dad's cousin's sister's aunty's friend owns a drone company. They always apply big commercial drone rules to ANY drone.
From 20:23 he had openly professed his own knowledge of flying drones under 250G and claiming safety as being paramount, and discussing whether he had insurance, he was in fact distracting the pilot mid flight and creating a safety hazard.
I agree 100% these is nothing like an "expert" Side note I know loads of people who think qualifications are "contagious" If you sit near someone or at the same desk you can catch a degree from them😂
It went from the airspace is controlled, you need a pilots license, to you can’t fly over crowds, to you have to have insurance , to you are breaking GDPR 😂😂😂 in less than 30 second
@danielweston8077that’s rubbish. Gdpr is the companies responsibility. If DJ records sensitive information then it’s them breaching gdpr. Also, he’s not technically flying commercially, but if you argued that being paid by TH-cam is commercial, then that’s fine. DJ has a license and insurance. If paparazzi photographs a politician and the politician is holding sensitive paperwork that can be seen in the pic, which person is breaking GDPR ?
I think it was Mark Twain who said “ Don’t argue with a idiot because they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience “ Great drone filming. Keep it going 👏
@PJ-wm9nq - 🤗They take it in turns to show off their knowledge, hoping this guy is going to end up saying: "Sod this! ... I'm going over to the pub for a pint! ... Keep your cheap old yachts!" 🤣
That last guy is a credit to the company. He seriously deserves a pay rise. Sorry to see you had trouble from the first people that approached you. There is no need for such behaviour. Keep up the amazing work! 🙂
Well they tried there best to stop the drone flight. Not very good negotiators. Thank god the company has at least one decent employee. If you're in the market for a yacht, I'd look for the guy at the end. Great video 👍
It’s very worrying that so many people out there have no idea of the law. They talk like they know it all and they really don’t. Thank you for sharing this video. I appreciate you 😊
Bald guy rescued it : ) A true salesman.... plenty of interesting banter, and he really made the company shine : ) If only everyone took the opportunity to big up their company.
Great video 😀, this one had everything. The sales guy at the end was great, turned the visit around. Spot on about the SIA rules. It's also good that you looked into and spoke about commercial photography and YT. People need to be educated more about the difference.
Great drone footage. Living in Plymouth, i always wanted to see inside there. We see some lovely yachts out ready for their trials......if only i had a spare couple million!
What they fail to realize is that it was the "Oggy Oggy" truck that was running the real surveillance on their operations all along... And the security guy seemingly took off or hid his SIU badge when he came back out to talk again...
I think all they need to establish is that you're not an official auditor.. i.e if you highlighted any breaches on their site , you're not able to take any action against them, the independent auditor isn't able to shut the site down etc.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. I think the more you get involved with chatting with workers etc, the more confused it gets. I’d just say, I’m doing it…that’s it.
Mention he word "DRONE" and you get :- oh! , you cant fly here ! , we own the airspace above !, you can't come in !, its too dangerous !, Phone the police !, Get the boss here quickly ! , we have people here ! , have you got proper documents !! , but you know what DJE, you handled it all perfectly and never raised your voice once , you readily answered all their made up questions , and it was really good to watch them all scurrying away "heads down" after the debate , as they finally realized just how silly they were behaving as higher management , the security guard came round to it all in the end , as too did the very informative gentleman worker on his way out , WELL DONE DJE, class act.
I'm only 20 mins in, but you are doing a great job. It's sooo much more effective to respond to their 'beliefs' with facts. great work. Edit: LOS is still a bit dodgy though...please be careful for the good of the community
The guy is right , I DO own the airspace above my property up to a certain height, but I don't CONTROL that airspace , just like I can own land that has a right of way , but not control access to it .
You are the one that's incorrect, check out the lower and upper stratum. Who owns the air above your land? Source -- Land Owners Rights. Well in short you do! So why do you ask are aircraft allowed to overfly? The answer is in the Civil Aviation Act 1982 which, denies the landowner any remedy for “trespass” or “nuisance” “by reason only of the flight of an aircraft over any property at a height above the ground which, having regard to wind, weather and all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, or the ordinary incidents of such flight.” If your neighbours tree overhangs your property you are entitled to ask them to remove it or do so yourself (subject to tree preservation orders of course) and return to them the offending branch. In built up areas you now rarely see T cranes with their swinging counterbalance. This is because the adjacent landowner is entitled to refuse permission for it to over swing their land and can charge a substantial sum to grant permission. Under English law a landowner owns the airspace above his land (unless it has been expressly excluded from the lease or transfer to him) and it is therefore trespass if a developer or its contractor allows a tower crane jib to swing across land owned by other parties. An adjoining owner can obtain an injunction to prevent such trespass without needing to show that any damage has occurred. An ‘Oversail’ licence is required and a fee must be negotiated in which the landowner can effective ask whatever they like. Not yet tested in law the same will apply to the operation of a drone. You must have permission of the landowner to overfly their land because drone operations take place in that area below that the level at which ordinary flight takes place. This area of airspace owned by the landowner! Ah, but my permission from the CAA says I can fly up to 50 meters from a structure so surely if I keep that distance away I am ok. Well no, all the CAA are doing is saying what you can do from the CAA point of view. It is down to you the Drone Pilot to secure the permissions to overfly land that you have not had permission to take off from.@@zendesigner
@@TONE11111 lol , down the rabbit hole over a Drone , a quick search brought up this "The basis of UK land law is the presumption that all land belongs to the Crown. Everybody else is a tenant of the Crown who holds their land from the Crown. This principle operates on the basis of Right of Conquest, when it was accepted that the sovereign owned all the land and individuals could hold, or rent, land from the king, but at a price - usually cash or fighting men for the king. This is the origin of a leasehold property. Later, when the king required more money, he started selling land ‘freehold’. This meant the tenant could hold or occupy the land free of any charge to a superior. Note that in both cases the land is merely held, not owned. In other words, purchasers did not buy the land; they bought the freehold, or the right to occupy the land without charge. In this way, all individuals except the sovereign were said to hold the land “of” someone else. This is the roots of sovereignty. However, when land became ‘ownerless’ [as in intestate estates or company bankruptcy], it reverted back to the sovereign as absolute owner. This principle still operates today. However, instead of the word ‘sovereign’, the word ‘Crown’ is used as a metaphor for the institution of government - which the sovereign embodies and represents."
THEY KNOW EVERYTHING THEY THINK !! old saying "NOBHEADS FOLLOW THE MUCK CART +THOUGHT IT WAS A WEDDING"...A little knowledge is dangerous, knowing SWEET F.A. is hilairious. Great vid D.J.E.
You talk about CAA rule regarding line of sight, but if you read it properly not only do you need line of sight on the drone but know which way the drone is facing. This is from the CAA own website. Please don’t ruin this hobby for us. 2. Always keep your drone or model aircraft in direct sight and make sure you have a full view of the surrounding airspace You must be sure that you'll be able to spot any hazards, in the air or on the ground, and avoid any collisions. You must be able to see your drone or model aircraft clearly enough that you can tell which way it’s facing. This is so that you can steer and control it safely, even if something happens unexpectedly. You must be able to see it without using: binoculars a telephoto lens electronic viewing equipment, such as a smart phone, tablet or video goggles Using normal glasses and contact lenses is fine.
Seaton Barracks closed down years ago. It's now a retail park and is about 5 miles away. He might be talking about Stonehouse Barracks which is only a couple stone throws away.
21:20 It doesn't matter if it's his personal phone or not. It's still caught by GDPR because he's doing for work purposes. In fact, by being a personal phone its worse for him because it means the data controller of Princess Yachts will have to look through his phone possibly seeing stuff that is private to him. And he can't stop that.
Nice yacht yard! I think if I ever get rich enough for one I will be calling. And if that happens, I will make sure DJE Media gets credit for the sale.
Always worries me when some keeps saying “ we just want to make sure your safe”…….. like saying “just putting you in handcuffs for your safety just incase you hurt yourself”😂😂
The baldhead guy was good they could learn from him. Very respectful. Made the company shine at the end
The difference between a real sales person and management class
Agreed - what a massive difference in attitude, selling the firm in the best possible way, explaining the various price ranges and sizes, doing a superb marketing job with no bad "what are you doing" attitude.
OK, I don't have £750,000 let alone £3+ Million, but he redeemed that company in 2-3 minutes compared to the "we insist" drone owner (perhaps having his Health and Safety head screwed on tight!!)
Security guard and hidden SIA card seemed quite a lot more reasonable at the end, despite the attitude several staff were showing initially without knowing, not caring about the limits of what they can expect, demand or request, just blundering about like a bull in a china shop, making ridiculous claims about what is needed, what's not allowed and why they felt private land stopped any access or recording about what may be visible.
Amazing degree of patience and calmness shown to hold back from saying "nothing you can do to stop me" which might have been my reaction, had I been faced by those initial staff members, assuming they had the ability to prevent someone doing a legal activity (ignoring their unsupported expectations of doing what they wished, and meekly conforming to their silly demands).
You see the same thing at most companies, the management usually have a lack of intelligence and common sense compared with the lower staff, higher education doesn't equal intelligence, its just collecting and remembering data to gain a degree.
Ive met people who earn millions and cant change a bayonet light bulb.
This is the reason most staff at a company know whats going wrong and can see what needs changing to make staff happy but management cant figure it out because they're too lazy and important to leave their desk, this equals high staff turnover and poor customer service
Came here for this comment, he was great and turned it around at the end
Appalling but funny until him
@@marinka424He probably does. So what?
The brokenheaded logic from them of "It's fine that our security guard is hiding his SIA licence" but also thinking they're entitled to your operator ID, insurance etc.
Its NOT broken-headed logic as you rather patronisingly state- its Lack of information- and knowledge.
Plus territoriality that is embedded in the behavior of ALL of us- especially regarding , your place of work OR your Home-
The Brokenheads, are the folks who know they are riling people and continue doggedly to do so, while being deliberately vague, and as the Older Heavyset guy said,and i wish he had made DJE squirm a lot more- when he pointed out the sheer cheek and hypocrisy of someone probing and being an absolutely nosy busybody for the sake of a bank balance every week or month- He could easily find Less Combative work if he was,in any way responsive to reasonable questions. He is just Sarcastic, dry- and Evasive.
What a nice bunch of Princesses these clowns are. The nice guy at the end saved their day.
Never ceased to be amazed by the number of people prepared to spout absolute rubbish....whilst believing they are knowledgeable and aware of the law. In reality, they look very, very silly.
@ericmurray8233 - 🤔hmmm... not silly, necessarily, just semi-informed and confused! ( as we all are! )
The absolute ignorant bullshit spewing out of their mouth is staggering. Making stuff up as they go along.
🤔... Yes, right, however, everyone does that really, don't they? ... Very few people are actually experts at anything, even the job they are doing!
... The phrase: "A littlr knowledge is a dangerous thing!" comes to mind, so that's why they will call "the authorities", who will then REALLY muddy the waters! ( but spout THEIR person opinions, yet in a very authoritative and pretend-knowledgeable way! ) 🤣🤪
What is really scary is that these people have right to vote. No wonder we are in a mess.
YES that is the simple answer to the problem. MORE RESEARCH NEEDED into who can and who cannot VOTE.
well said...
That is exactly what I think … never underestimate the power of st
@@ItsEasyJustLiftYou are mistaken on the right to use airspace, you are confusing the rights to build on your land to a height rather than use of airspace by an aircraft in this case a drone.
@@ItsEasyJustLift Wrong, your research was too hasty. The restrictions applying to upper and lower strata apply to overhanging trees, or structures such as signs or cranes, not to drones.
DJE's drone is sub-250g. Crowds cannot be overflown. It cannot be flown at altitudes above 400 ft, but can be flown as low as the operator wants. There is a restriction on horizontal distance from buildings, but not on vertical distance. Airspace above private property is controlled by the CAA, not by the owner, so no trespass.
That guy saved the company's reputation
We own the airspace, this guy makes boats that can fly
Flying boats can fly.🤣
@@keithpop3097 - 🤠Right! ... and that ownership extends right out of Earth's atmosphere, and into space, as far as the end of the universe! ... ( my uncle's friend's wife's husband has a cousin that works at Nasa! ... So I'm VERY well informed of that fact! ) 🤣
Ah people who know drone (and photography) law because their dad's cousin's sister's aunty's friend owns a drone company. They always apply big commercial drone rules to ANY drone.
From 20:23 he had openly professed his own knowledge of flying drones under 250G and claiming safety as being paramount, and discussing whether he had insurance, he was in fact distracting the pilot mid flight and creating a safety hazard.
I agree 100% these is nothing like an "expert" Side note I know loads of people who think qualifications are "contagious" If you sit near someone or at the same desk you can catch a degree from them😂
It went from the airspace is controlled, you need a pilots license, to you can’t fly over crowds, to you have to have insurance , to you are breaking GDPR 😂😂😂 in less than 30 second
You need OUR permission 😂.
Turn up in Hi-Vis with 'drone pilot' on the back, a take off/ landing pad etc. and it's rare that you will be approached .
@@A2Z1Two3 - 🤨But drone pilots MUST carry spare batteries and a screwdriver, and a sandwich🤪
@danielweston8077that’s rubbish. Gdpr is the companies responsibility. If DJ records sensitive information then it’s them breaching gdpr.
Also, he’s not technically flying commercially, but if you argued that being paid by TH-cam is commercial, then that’s fine. DJ has a license and insurance.
If paparazzi photographs a politician and the politician is holding sensitive paperwork that can be seen in the pic, which person is breaking GDPR ?
@kensukadventures628 youre wrong, what you regard is of no consequence.
is that the factory where they make muppets.
😅😂😅😂😅😂😅
ffs 🤣😂🤣😂
😂😂
NO, they just employ them
The world is full of dummies. We are all screwed.
Very true, time to buy yourself a sailing yacht and leave it all behind.
@@marinka424 I have a sailing yacht 🥺. But I’ve never played golf.
@@marinka424 very true, thank you.
That's why aliens 👽 won't visit. 😂
Aye it is- the sooner Martians need Inspiring Motivational speakers the better- off world sound good to you ?
Perhaps you could go ,one day-
Omg the so called employee drone owner was an expert in everything. In his own mind,
I think it was Mark Twain who said “ Don’t argue with a idiot because they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience “
Great drone filming. Keep it going 👏
I thought that was Douglas Adams but I can imagine Twain saying it too.
Ha hahahaha. Their knowledge is not only nonsense but comedic too. They probably interrogate the gulls too.
@PJ-wm9nq - 🤗They take it in turns to show off their knowledge, hoping this guy is going to end up saying: "Sod this! ... I'm going over to the pub for a pint! ... Keep your cheap old yachts!" 🤣
What a turnaround great to see that guy who was so positive about the company
The security man needs to read up on the law .
are you sure they can read LOL
Can't believe the driver who thought they could just block a company exit to take a phone call, 🤡
I love the confidence when they quote inaccurate information 😂😂😂
That last guy is a credit to the company. He seriously deserves a pay rise. Sorry to see you had trouble from the first people that approached you. There is no need for such behaviour. Keep up the amazing work! 🙂
Ashamed at the lack of intelligence, last guy sound 🎖
if frowning was an olympic sport Mel would win a gold.
Agonised frown of his knowledge being wrong but wont have it,, that's the most work he has done in ages.
The guy at the end was very decent, and spoke well. If only people realised this is free advertisement for them.
My god....that womans face
Same, the downwards displeasing angle of her eyebrows was classic !
Yes, looked like a punched lasagna
Face like the smell of gas
chewing wasps all day.
yes, like a bulldog chewing a wasp.
Hope they see how stupid they sound! Educate yourself before challenging members of the public. Great video!!
Sometimes it pays off to just listen, and look intelligent! 🥳
Some of these people complaining talk utter dribble their only embarrassing themselfs 😊
Your spelling is embarrassing you pal!
@@ipjdean don't let it worry you
Wonderful advert for the company, super informative, obviously proud of his Company, almost made me break into my piggy bank!
Well they tried there best to stop the drone flight. Not very good negotiators. Thank god the company has at least one decent employee. If you're in the market for a yacht, I'd look for the guy at the end. Great video 👍
@josh_bfc_2769 - 😁OK! ... I'll remember that, when I get my "yacht-license"! 🤣
Hope to christ they build their boats more water tight than their arguments.
It’s very worrying that so many people out there have no idea of the law. They talk like they know it all and they really don’t. Thank you for sharing this video. I appreciate you 😊
With those ears, I suggest he gets a pilots license. One strong gust and those lugs will see him airborne.
Oi! I have big ears... 😂😂😂😂
Funny
Muppets R US!!?? SWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEAHHHHHOHHWIMBOWAAAY!!
The guy at the end was great and a credit to the business, the rest of them not so much. Great video!
Bald guy rescued it : ) A true salesman.... plenty of interesting banter, and he really made the company shine : )
If only everyone took the opportunity to big up their company.
Security definitely showed their lack of intelligence and education reguarding drones.
1% of the UK own firearms, DJE has met most of them.
So many idiots in one location. Very funny.
18:08 He got his arse handed to him, so now wants the Police cos his ego got dented
I'm guessing he bowls from the pavilion end so would be very familiar with that part of his anatomy anyway.
Guy at the end saved the day ! What a lovely man 🎉
Liked this vid. Nice one DJE! Geezer at the end was bang on as well!
The guy at the end was a proper gent. A real human being.
The guy at the end with the notepad was spot on. It just shows its nice to be nice.
They own outer space aswell
and the seabed because of those pesky submarines.
Only as far as the Andromeda galaxy.
Great video 😀, this one had everything. The sales guy at the end was great, turned the visit around. Spot on about the SIA rules. It's also good that you looked into and spoke about commercial photography and YT. People need to be educated more about the difference.
She could turn mild in to sour cream with a single look
He said the magic words of the stupid world: "If you have nothing to hide" 🤣🤣🤣
something ive noticed, when somebody tries to tell somebody else they can not do something, do often they are willing to lie and make stuff up
Gentleman at the end was a total credit to the company unlike all the others, respect sir.
That guy at the end great salesman saved the day different attitude nice one dje
Oh please please say Mike Hunt when a lady asks you for your name, I love it when they repeat it.
Scott Chegg , I reference Reggie Photo for that is better.
PJ said it to a woman in an old video.
Wayne Kerr.
Chris Packet one of the auditors used!
Great drone footage. Living in Plymouth, i always wanted to see inside there. We see some lovely yachts out ready for their trials......if only i had a spare couple million!
What they fail to realize is that it was the "Oggy Oggy" truck that was running the real surveillance on their operations all along...
And the security guy seemingly took off or hid his SIU badge when he came back out to talk again...
So if i Understand it..... This is a factory where they make absolute idiots, and fix boats on the side ?
Imagine stopping a car in the street, and telling the driver you just need to check whether he's safe.
"of course i've got a name " haha 🤣
Very funny 😂
Gentleman at the end was lovely.
They look at each other to back up the rubbish they’re making up…the guy in the grey top would argue with his own shadow 😂
I think all they need to establish is that you're not an official auditor.. i.e if you highlighted any breaches on their site , you're not able to take any action against them, the independent auditor isn't able to shut the site down etc.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing. I think the more you get involved with chatting with workers etc, the more confused it gets. I’d just say, I’m doing it…that’s it.
Thanks for your audit and boots on the ground. Thanks from America 🇺🇸🙏🏻🛸👽💭🧠🪄🐷ℹ️
I used to work in Princess (other site in Plymouth)) couple years ago , building 35m yacht. Best regards to all the nice guys i met there!
Loved the guy at the end who explained how people buy different types of yacht... he was lovely
Amazing
@@DJEMEDIA for me, he was the best part of the video, bless him 😊😊😊
the guy at the end is great for the company shame about the rest
Mention he word "DRONE" and you get :- oh! , you cant fly here ! , we own the airspace above !, you can't come in !, its too dangerous !, Phone the police !, Get the boss here quickly ! , we have people here ! , have you got proper documents !! , but you know what DJE, you handled it all perfectly and never raised your voice once , you readily answered all their made up questions , and it was really good to watch them all scurrying away "heads down" after the debate , as they finally realized just how silly they were behaving as higher management , the security guard came round to it all in the end , as too did the very informative gentleman worker on his way out , WELL DONE DJE, class act.
ha ha ha.. Mel looks like she could break rocks with that scowl.
Wow biggest bunch of lawmen I’ve ever seen. It’s wonderful to see all these men that know all the laws of the land
I'm only 20 mins in, but you are doing a great job. It's sooo much more effective to respond to their 'beliefs' with facts. great work. Edit: LOS is still a bit dodgy though...please be careful for the good of the community
The guy is right , I DO own the airspace above my property up to a certain height, but I don't CONTROL that airspace , just like I can own land that has a right of way , but not control access to it .
someone gets it at last 🙂
bullshit mate, you dont even own 1cm above your lawn 😂
You are the one that's incorrect, check out the lower and upper stratum. Who owns the air above your land? Source -- Land Owners Rights.
Well in short you do! So why do you ask are aircraft allowed to overfly? The answer is in the Civil Aviation Act 1982 which, denies the landowner any remedy for “trespass” or “nuisance” “by reason only of the flight of an aircraft over any property at a height above the ground which, having regard to wind, weather and all the circumstances of the case is reasonable, or the ordinary incidents of such flight.” If your neighbours tree overhangs your property you are entitled to ask them to remove it or do so yourself (subject to tree preservation orders of course) and return to them the offending branch. In built up areas you now rarely see T cranes with their swinging counterbalance. This is because the adjacent landowner is entitled to refuse permission for it to over swing their land and can charge a substantial sum to grant permission. Under English law a landowner owns the airspace above his land (unless it has been expressly excluded from the lease or transfer to him) and it is therefore trespass if a developer or its contractor allows a tower crane jib to swing across land owned by other parties. An adjoining owner can obtain an injunction to prevent such trespass without needing to show that any damage has occurred. An ‘Oversail’ licence is required and a fee must be negotiated in which the landowner can effective ask whatever they like.
Not yet tested in law the same will apply to the operation of a drone. You must have permission of the landowner to overfly their land because drone operations take place in that area below that the level at which ordinary flight takes place. This area of airspace owned by the landowner!
Ah, but my permission from the CAA says I can fly up to 50 meters from a structure so surely if I keep that distance away I am ok. Well no, all the CAA are doing is saying what you can do from the CAA point of view. It is down to you the Drone Pilot to secure the permissions to overfly land that you have not had permission to take off from.@@zendesigner
@@TONE11111 lol , down the rabbit hole over a Drone , a quick search brought up this "The basis of UK land law is the presumption that all land belongs to the Crown. Everybody else is a tenant of the Crown who holds their land from the Crown.
This principle operates on the basis of Right of Conquest, when it was accepted that the sovereign owned all the land and individuals could hold, or rent, land from the king, but at a price - usually cash or fighting men for the king. This is the origin of a leasehold property. Later, when the king required more money, he started selling land ‘freehold’. This meant the tenant could hold or occupy the land free of any charge to a superior. Note that in both cases the land is merely held, not owned. In other words, purchasers did not buy the land; they bought the freehold, or the right to occupy the land without charge. In this way, all individuals except the sovereign were said to hold the land “of” someone else. This is the roots of sovereignty. However, when land became ‘ownerless’ [as in intestate estates or company bankruptcy], it reverted back to the sovereign as absolute owner. This principle still operates today. However, instead of the word ‘sovereign’, the word ‘Crown’ is used as a metaphor for the institution of government - which the sovereign embodies and represents."
@@uptowndisco2 - 😋So... just give Buckingham Palace a call? 😲😳
Nice one bro. But wonder how many people stopped the video at 2:09 to see DJ's face in the window. Looks younger than I thought.
He reminds me a little of Tommy Robinson, obviously younger
The bloke at the end was great👏👏
I want to have T-shirt with text "My sister owns drone company so I know what I'm doing" and I could wear that when I'm flying with my drone.
"my reptile brain can't cope with you filming my property" 😂 lizards
Her bewildered face is a picture...The Scream.
THEY KNOW EVERYTHING THEY THINK !! old saying "NOBHEADS FOLLOW THE MUCK CART +THOUGHT IT WAS A WEDDING"...A little knowledge is dangerous, knowing SWEET F.A. is hilairious.
Great vid D.J.E.
that last chap was a credit to the company! absolute star!
Their version of GDPR is hilarious!!
😂😂😂 the only air space he owns is between his ears 😂😂😂
Perfect😂
Perfect answer ! 🤣
And there is a huge vacuum inside.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤒👍 HI MEL and TOM........ Subtle hilarity, perfect execution. 🎰🎰🎰🎰🎰🎰
You talk about CAA rule regarding line of sight, but if you read it properly not only do you need line of sight on the drone but know which way the drone is facing.
This is from the CAA own website.
Please don’t ruin this hobby for us.
2. Always keep your drone or model aircraft in direct sight and make sure you have a full view of the surrounding airspace
You must be sure that you'll be able to spot any hazards, in the air or on the ground, and avoid any collisions.
You must be able to see your drone or model aircraft clearly enough that you can tell which way it’s facing. This is so that you can steer and control it safely, even if something happens unexpectedly.
You must be able to see it without using:
binoculars
a telephoto lens
electronic viewing equipment, such as a smart phone, tablet or video goggles
Using normal glasses and contact lenses is fine.
From where he was, if his feed cut, he'd be able to see what way it was moving and facing. Your argument is invalid in this instance.
I think DJE already knows the regulations
Poor Rupert and his shell suit. All that expensive education, and he thinks Father owns the air....
Grassing is normal now. It used to be frowned upon.
Paused at 19:36 .............. One your best videos so far IMO !!! 🙂
Such a corporate answer: "For YOUR protection as well as ours...."
@@petercornish9903 🤣
What a nice guy at the end talking about what they do and the sale of the yachts, he's a credit to the company, well done
This is a classic, they absolutely mugged themselves off to make some great content but fortunately for them the guy at the end salvaged it.
even the coppers cant see your ID unless you ve been accused of a crime
You still don't even have to show your details then.
You're mistaken, the law changed in 2021 and the police can require you to give them your details.
@@NickLeaand if you don't they can legally only detain you for 24 hours
Seaton Barracks closed down years ago. It's now a retail park and is about 5 miles away. He might be talking about Stonehouse Barracks which is only a couple stone throws away.
21:20 It doesn't matter if it's his personal phone or not. It's still caught by GDPR because he's doing for work purposes. In fact, by being a personal phone its worse for him because it means the data controller of Princess Yachts will have to look through his phone possibly seeing stuff that is private to him. And he can't stop that.
Is there a lot of interbreeding in that part of the country?
Wow. So many people are so sadly informed. Great video as usual. Cheers Paul 👍
Yet another barrack room lawyer who actually doesn’t have a clue.
Nice yacht yard! I think if I ever get rich enough for one I will be calling. And if that happens, I will make sure DJE Media gets credit for the sale.
The guy at the end saved the day
Always worries me when some keeps saying “ we just want to make sure your safe”…….. like saying “just putting you in handcuffs for your safety just incase you hurt yourself”😂😂
In regards to Property Law an owner of a private property does have some ownership of the air to a certain extant above the property.
At 14 minutes two of the cast from the League of gentleman appear.
Old Pugsley was back pedalling at warp speed. I still wouldn't put him on my xmas card list though! LOL.
Solid work as always DJE. Cheers bud. Always the gent,with the savvy 🙂👍
In your reflection, you look like Waldo.
That last chap was great 👍👍