Joker Folie à Deux was BOOTY CHEEKS
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ต.ค. 2024
- Joker: Folie à Deux is the latest film from DC Studios and is the last film before James Gunn's DCU kicks off with Superman: Legacy. The movie was developed alongside some of the DCEU films during Warner Bros.' previous regime. This Joker sequel centers on Arthur Fleck and a new iteration of Harley Quinn, incorporating musical elements. It takes a different approach in adapting aspects of the Batman mythos from DC Comics. Unfortunately, the film falls flat as a sequel, suffering from poor pacing, too many unnecessary elements, and the regression of Arthur Fleck's character.
#batman #joker #harleyquinn #dcu #jamesgunn #dc #dccomics - บันเทิง
"It'd be funny if it weren’t so pathetic." -The Joker
“Oh what the heck, I’ll laugh anyway. AHAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA
@@devonsmith4731 If you don't like the movie I've got slides
@@Animefan-uk8pw “I’ll break you in too” hahahahaha Batman, if you’d had the guts for that kinda fun, you’ve would’ve done it years ago, I on the another hand” 🔪
Return of the Joker
Yes😮
The fact WB rejected a Batman Beyond animated movie but forced Todd Phillips to make Joker 2 is absolute nasty work.
wb are completely incompetent, there are plenty of corpos who make terrible choices with franchises but every now and then they'll cook up some bangers or at least middling fan service but wb's propensity for making the worst most unwatchable garbage and choosing the wrong option every time needs to be studied
They are literally allergic to making good financial decisions.
@@SpiderGuy2008TheSequel They also deleted Batgirl. And deleted Coyote vs ACME. And gave us Velma season 2.
@@whitespider584and now that goddamn Halloween special
No one forced him to make a musical and make the main character of the Joker movies (plural) not the Joker.... you would think someone would have noticed it and didn't want to lose a billion dollars in revenue.... billions plural if you think that there could have been a part 3 if this wasn't horrible.
Joker: Fumble a Douche: continuing the WBD tradition of ruining DC characters and creating trash films.
WBD? Warner Bros has been doing this for decades!
Thor: Love and Thunder 🤝 Joker 2 = The Director clearly had no interest in doing a sequel but the studio forced them to do it anyway because the last movie made them a lot of money. So why not do it again?
That's facts.
Love and Thunder at least had a solid premise if Tiaka actually put effort, you could have told a cool serious story about Thor losing the love of his life to a God Butcher.
Jonkler 2 was pointless to begin with. Not only did the first film felt like the Batman references could have been removed and nothing would be lost but this only confirms it had no intentions on making him feel more like the Joker. I was really hoping this movie would make Arthur FEEL more like the Joker rather than just a killer in clown makeup, but I guess effort is too much to ask for in the streaming age.
The Thor comparison doesn't make sense though. Tiaka didn't give a shit about Thor and shit all over his lore. Ragnarok is a funny movie but it's a garbage Thor movie. Even if he didn't want a sequel it was going to have a sequel, it's part of the MCU franchise. Joker on the other hand didn't need a sequel whatsoever, the ambiguous ending gets completely ruined by a sequel existing.
@@sombramemer1230 yeah thor has so many stories that you can tell that a sequel to ragnarok made perfect sense, was wanted, and expected. Joker 2 just had zero reason to exist.
I remember when the second trailer had video essays being written about just the teaser, and now no ones talking about it in the same way
I defended the hell outta this movie when the news was coming out. Damn I look dumb.
You didn't know. But hey, now we can laugh at it together
Bro for real. I feel betrayed 😭
I’m really sorry for you man. Truly I am.
This is what they do now. Frack over things you like because
Yup now dance white boi
It's actually disgusting because Arthur LITERALLY gets his Joker persona r@ped out of him. Like that actually happens.
It's a metaphor for the whole film.
wtf is this movie 😭
Oh hell naw
Remember kids it's funny when it happens to a guy but tragic when it happens to a woman.
Who directed this? Zack Snyder?
A joker movie and the guy isn't even the joker thats gotta be false advertisement
People keep trying to defend It by saying it's a "DIFFERENT INTERPRETATION 🤓" no Todd is just using the joker ip for an entirely different character. Definitely false advertising
Tbf that was my problem with the first Joker. He never felt like the supervillain Joker, he was just some guy. If anything this movie establishes that the Joker identity doesn't work in the real world.
@@mightguy3118Uh, John Doe from the Telltale Batman games is a completely different character from the Joker… and he’s one of my favorites, definitely underrated.
Would everyone have been more happy if Batman and Joker fought on a rooftop at the end? The cycle of inspiration continues. Ending was good
@@nono9543nah joker can definitely work in real life given how many terrorist and criminal organizations and serial killers exist irl and get away with crimes for years. These joker movies just were too afraid to actually make a movie with an actual true villain as the antagonist
I was really hoping that this movie would popularize Classic Harley characterization from BTAS...
Why would you think that when this version of Joker is inaccurate as well?
@@VVguy1 because we dont get that characterzation anymore. İts beign replaced by SS ver since 2016. Even in comics.
@@Vilgax00 I get that, but it was always a lot to expect given how the Joker is portrayed. At that point, you kind of set yourself up for it.
@@CEJAAY fair enough.
@@Vilgax00 I’ve gave up hope of ever seeing Harley be a good character like she was in BTAS. We’re stuck with modern Harley I think.
Basically Joker 2 is the Euphoria season 2 of comic book movies. Good visuals and solid performances but god awful writing and character choices that are nonsense
I'd rather call this a "Bad Romance." 😂
I see what you did there
You know what's really funny about this? The ending is literally what Willem Dafoe pitched to Todd Phillips when Willem Dafoe publicly acknowledged all the fan casting of himself as Joker. Willem Dafoe pitched someone being really inspired by Arthur's Joker but slightly different, essentially having two Jokers in the same film with one of them eventually killing the other. And as you can see that idea got to Todd Phillips. But Dafoe wanted the two Jokers to actively back and forth with the conflict driving the film, instead of a random inmate killing Arthur and going on to become the "real" Joker. Willem Dafoe has a better film idea than Todd Phillips did.
It’s like Defoe wanted to do a better take on the Three Jokers storyline.
Dafoe is a true professional
This would've been a much better sequel idea
Arthur Fleck after being thrown in prison because of the acts in the first movie gets broken out by a dedicated fan and his goons who do their best to elevate Arthur as a martyr in the eyes of Gotham and throughout the movie Arthur learns the fan is genuinely evil and unhinged in a way he himself never was and the two goes back and forth on who the Joker is supposed to be a symbol for the underdogs? Or a symbol of chaos and the uprooter of society?
I was looking forward to seeing Joker fighting, scheming, and running amuk. Instead, Joker got his cheeks clapped. WTF WERE THEY THINKING 😂
Whuuut?
EXCUSE ME????????
@@Rieky22 Joker gets graped by 3 prison guards
@@np4231 WHAT THE F**K???
The only time when Joker should get his cheeks clapped must be by Batman
I prefer the original ending to the first movie where an older arthur says "you wouldn't get it, it's only between him(batman) and me" they would have cooked there instead of burning the kitchen with this
Facts
The moment BatBale walked in and said:"what are you? Some kind of Joker?" and Joker replied with:"don't be a Bat, Man" is when the theatre went nuts, such amazing writing.
Atleast, that's what I think happened. I haven't watched the movie. I will wait until it releases on a streaming platform in my country. Will watch it then. Maybe.
After reading that the movie was some sort of a musical, I think he'd do the infamous beatbox
The absolute BALLS to directly reference Heath Ledgers Joker at the end of this abomination should have Todd Phillips tried for treason
How?
@@laughslapproductions4690cutting his smile
Joker 2 is another reason to watch Transformers One or The Wild Robot instead
man i'm still mad tf:1 isn't out here in the uk yet
I’m going to check transformers one first before wild robot
@@daydreaminavenueMe too, I have been wanting to watch TF One for a while and I'll probably watch Wild Robot since both have really good reviews. Specifically their audience reviews more.
The Sequel absolutely nobody wanted. From start to finish I gained nothing from watching that slop
I’m pretty everyone was hyped to see it. Only to get disappointed.
@@ShockwaveFPSStudios not from what I heard when they announced the sequel, most people including me didn’t see a reason for the original film to get “Part 2”
Yeah key sentence is when it was first announced lots of month went by and people started to get hyped ever since the first trailer dropped@@Jack_Donovan
If this is how Todd Philips is gonna tell people that the Joker did not need a sequel, he achieved his goal then.
The day this man says swear words after viewing something horrible will be a legendary event.
Joker: Folie à Deux
The first movie was something different. People went in expecting fight scenes and explosions, thinking it would be a typical DC superhero movie, but it was nothing like that. It offered a fresh perspective on the Joker, shifting the usual narrative to present a grounded, psychological portrayal of a man forgotten by a society that is growing colder and more neglectful, slipping through its ever widening cracks. It was a character study that pushed boundaries and raised questions about the line between victim and villain.
From the opening scene of Joker: Folie à Deux, we are reintroduced to Arthur, but this time he is not alone, his shadow (The Joker), is there with him. The shadow closing the closet on Arthur symbolizes the mental battle raging inside his mind, where the joker represents a personality that developed due to neglect and past experiences that left him weak and mentally unstable, much like an “extra” in a movie where fame and glory are what people look up to. This shadow gave Arthur everything he wanted, to be famous, recognizable, the headline of the news, fulfilling his needs.
In the sequel, Harley is supposed to represent the audience.“You are not The Joker anymore.” That is what the viewers felt at the end of the movie; they wanted to see the Joker and Harley go on a rampage, committing violence as The Clown Prince and Princess of Crime. Both the audience and Harley are disappointed when Arthur chooses his human side over the persona of the Joker.
By the movie’s end, Arthur is killed by someone who will live up to “The Shadow.” Someone closer in age to Batman and Harley. He was psychotic, unpredictable, and deranged, making him more fitting to carry the title of the Joker.
The Joker duology offers a more realistic and controversial take on the character. While many wanted the first movie to show the Joker on a killing spree with his maniacal, crackling laugh evoking chaos and madness, they were met with a challenging dive into his psyche. In the second movie, audiences expected the Joker to escape from prison first attempt and go on with The Princess of Crime to perpetuate a cycle of violence and wreak havoc on Gotham. Instead, they share Harley’s disappointment with Arthur, who fails to live up to the fantasy of their chaotic crusade, leaving both the audience, and Harley feeling let down.
the ending made this and the first movie pointless
Right? Like seriously! What was the point of this?!
To be fair, did we really expect a near 70 year old Joker to fight Batman 20 years from now after seeing how old Bruce was in the first film?
@@SecretMagician no one said anything about batman
@supercooledits123 it's a origin story explaining how the Joker came to be. The inevitable point is him eventually fighting Batman. But unless he was going to be elderly once that happened, considering Bruce showed up as a kid in the first film, he wasn't going to be the REAL Joker.
@@SecretMagician truth is? it being a generational difference could've been original and inspired or...*subversive* by the amount of different versions of batman v joker in the *numerous* comics in the DC Multiverse.
Dare I say it the Gothem TV show was more creative and fun than whatever the hell this movie was. Bullshit.
To prepare for the role, The actor for Harvey Dent stated that he avoided watching the versions of Harvey Dent in Batman (1989), Batman Forever (1995), The Dark Knight (2008) and Batman vs. Two-Face (2017) portrayed by Billy Dee Williams, Tommy Lee Jones, Aaron Eckhart and William Shatner respectively.
That says a lot about his performance 😢
Off topic here but you should definitely do a video about Lady Shiva next. I hate the fact that they had her be grateful to David Cain after everything he's done to her.
I think it’s so funny how people are rushing to blame the studio or the edit, as if the guy who made Hangover 3 is above making a bad movie lol
How can the guy who made the Hangover comedies makes a Joker movie with cinematography, and cinematic visuals, and all those fancy schmuck.
@@ShockwaveFPSStudios First Joker movie is not that good, and it lifted so much from Scorcese
@@KobytheHeroThe Batman is not that good, and it lifted so much from Lucas.
@@ShockwaveFPSStudios You try to deflect because you have no substantial response. Work on that 👍
@@KobytheHero it was sarcasm.
The ending could’ve worked if they maybe set up the guy as someone who admires Arthur just because he enjoys the chaos he causes and nothing else to make him seem less like Arthur 2.0 and didn’t have him cut a smile into his face if you wanted to go the way of “Arthur isn’t the real Joker” which is a dumb way to go but if you’re already doing that yk
I swear that ending was written by a Reddit cuz wtf kinda edgy lame ass shit was that💀💀
I also heard Joker wasn't being Joker he was just Arthur and the only time he was joker was in his head
Harley Quinn's box office appearances are starting to become a red flag to a film's overall quality. Harley haters (me) have even more ammo now.
To recap harley's movie history,
Suicide squad 2016,
A hated but modestly successful movie,
Birds of prey,
A widely disliked movie and at the time one of the biggest box office failures in DC movie history.
The suicide squad,
Considered generally good but was a financial failure.
Joker 2,
A despised movie but we don't know exactly how much it will make,
Add on to the batman and harley animated movie being bad,
The harley Quinn show being extremely disrespectful and borderline spiteful of characters,
Injustice being liked at the time of release but is disliked now.
The god damm suicide squad game.
Yeah, harley has had a terrible showing as a character
@@technounionrepresentative4274 the only pure failure of harley quinn was birds of prey moviie, things like joker 2 or the suicide squad games are trash, even withouth harley
Also she’s not even Harley in Caped Crusader animation series 🥴
@@anastasiazhdanova1578 the best harley in years
Now that that's over, can we please get a funny guy in makeup who's also scary as the joker again
What makes it more annoying is that the trailer makes it look like its a good movie because the cinematography and visuals in the movie are great just as they were in the first movie but maybe even better but of course that doesn’t matter when the writing is horrible
Todd Phillips is a genius. Bro took the bag and make sure wb didnt ask him for a third 😂😂😂 he was like.
How can i make sure this doesnt work?
One word
Musical😅😅
This movie’s budget was $200 million. Ion know abt y’all but that’s the most expensive internet troll I’ve ever heard of bc this movie feels like studios seriously trolling
Since Joker 2 is trash, I highly suggest going to watch Transformers One it's a great movie with darker scenes and a compelling plot. I've watched it with my brother and it was awesome!
Get tickets to watch Transformers One in theaters tomorrow!
Finally we get a tragic and compelling story that's about the rise of Optimus Prime and Megatron and how they were best friends turned enemies
highly recommend it, wish the marketing wasn’t so shit
@username-yc3bd Don't worry with the movie getting positive reviews from critics and audiences at Rotten Tomatoes and people hashtagging on Twitter the movie will get attention of how good it is
Does it have wokeness
Would’ve been better if The GOAT that is Firefly was there to spit some Supa Hot Fire bars
Ice cream trucks, I chase that
Two shoes, I lace that
Chunk Dirty, I dump that
Justin Bieber, I bump that
Glasses jacket shirt man, I call me Winner
And after I win, I eat my dinner
But I'm not a rapper
As someone who is a fan of musicals, making a musical sequel to something that wasn’t originally a musical just immediately set off alarm bells. Musicals as a genre very rarely do sequels, and those musical sequels that do exist are almost always ass. The original film did have multiple dancing scenes, but those were very grounded in the gritty, realistic tone of the movie, and gritty realism is something musicals rarely if ever do well. So you’re combining multiple elements that tend to be poisonous to musicals and just expecting it to work.
I could see a stand alone Joker musical in the vein of Sweeny Todd working, like if they just took the original film, made a musical version of it, and then filmed actors performing it on stage and put it up on HBO Max.
Thank you. Your sacrifice will not go unappreciated.
To be honest wtf is Marvel even doing by not giving us Moon Knight again. Instead we got Agatha a show no one asked about and will probably have no impact on the MCU storyline.
Because those shows mostly never live beyond one season. Even if they're quality enough, they're still "consume product" level slop.
I've never seen a sequel of such a highly regarded film handled by the same writer/director get executed so badly. If another unnamed inmate goes on to become the "real" Joker, then what was the point of having Arthur Fleck as a character at all, what was the point of the first film? I remember when Joker: Folie a Deux was announced as a musical sequel and I saw a tweet that said, "This is either going to be the best sequel of all time, or the worst sequel of all time." The reviews speak for themselves.
before the plot was even revealed I knew it was gonna be trash 😭
Looks more like tragic film with the art of giving sorrow and it is some artist level of tragedy
Honestly I don't think any corporate knows the true definition of a sequel is and what it's purpose is anymore. That shit is lost to time 💀💀💀
They shouldn’t have never created an sequel from the get go. The first Joker Movie was a Masterpiece. I never get why people try to create an Part 2 for an iconic film and think they could top they’re predecessor.
Todd Philips really went “It’s not about money, it’s about sending the message”
As a prequel this would be a great way to introduce Batman
Honestly I feel like it should have just been it's own thing at this point
@@MILDMONSTER1234 perhaps though killing Joker off seems weak though he can always be resurrected & made even more unhinged with the Lazarus Pit
I can’t wait for joker 3
Does he know?
@@smokedsanjl hopefully
@@smokedsanjl He doesn't know!
I think we've come full circle with the Joker being over used and missused.
I think the use of Harvey was to reflect on his own duel identity. He refused to believe jokers diagnoses despite later in the lore, him having that exact diagnosis. I loved seeing them use the bomb to be Two Faces origin without focusing too much on that. I can see a two face spin off from this if they are going for cash cows
What a title! So wasn't expecting Booty Cheeks to pop up on my notifications.
I’m definitely not seeing this movie today, because literally there’s excuse to have a sequel to one of the best stand alone movies in the comic book film industry.
The aba and preach reference is perfect. I'm glad to know you kno about them
We were so excited for a sequel 😫
Who's we?
Alright said it once, but the fact that there's a nonzero chance of this being connect to The Dark Knight trilogy because of the ending is terrifying.
Impossible to connect them. Harvey is the one prosecuting Joker and gets his face damaged in the explosion, completely different from how he became Two Face in TDK. It just so happens the "real Joker" in this universe will have a scar smile like Ledger too. That’s it. It’s just a reference and we likely never see this universe again.
When will people learn that NOT following the source material isn’t always the answer?????
This was a billion dollar movie sequel.
Not a joker sequel.
Todd Phillips said he didn't even want to do a sequel so he made it so ppl hate it and joker is dead so there's no chance again
Based
Thats even Dumber
@@galaxytruth2823no, that's smart
Aba and Preach are a vibe
Joker never needed a sequel. Warner Brothers can’t leave well enough alone.
DC: Let me guess straight you’re telling me that the Joker Follé A Deux is complete garbage?
M Enterprises: Yes, and I’m tired of pretending it’s not.
Joker can't exist without darkknight
Harley was lying that she was pregnant, she literally lied why she came to Arkham.
7:51 when aba says he dances 💀
Between this and SSKTJL, I think that WB should think twice in approving more Harley Quinn projects again.
Bro how did we go from penguin to this
i liked the ending because i wanted him to die. after he started representing himself in court, i was wishing they made joker a genius who can successfully talk his way out of things. but he's just embarrassing. he's hopelessly dumb. i'd rather watch a movie following the guy who killed him but even then, that guy would be lessened because he took inspiration from fleck.
Just came from this movie
Good things cinematography
Bad things all the musical scene
Didn't even know this came out or was a thing
Great review man
Joker didnt need a sequel. If it didn’t make 1bill they would have never thought about making another sequel. lol
You know a movie is bad when the ONLY nice thing that anyone is saying about it is how good the CINEMATOGRAPHY was 😂
The fact Todd said he didn’t want to do a sequel and WB announcing there’ll be a second film was a huge red flag
Todd Philips wtf happened💀 i think this movie has just made me realize that he got lucky with the first movie because he basically just copied taxi driver. And it worked. But here, he tried to copy courtroom dramas and failed unbelievably. This movie just had no reason to justify its existence, and he clearly couldn’t find it. If the musical scenes were actually serving the plot, and the plot actually developed his character from the first movie, this could’ve been cool. But this movie literally regresses his character. At least the movie LOOKS amazing so I’d probably still watch it over some mid marvel movie. But damn this really ruins the first movie
This movie is a perfect example of what people who don't like musicals think what musicals are like
I am not surprised. A lot of critics I like to watch and even my closet friends who saw this early said it wasn't great. As someone who enjoyed the first film(not my cup of tea, movie wise but a good movie), I will probably skip out on this film. Todd Philips has always floundered with sequels(Hangover Part two) and I was hoping he could do something with Joker. A film that to be honest; didn't need a sequel. It told a competent story that was a good one off. But alas, because it made a billion dollars and was cheap, WB wanted a sequel. I do commend creatives for trying to be different but if you fail to execute that, the effort is meaningless. As for me, I'll be rewatching The Wild Robot over the weekend(fantastic movie) or watching the Penguin(which is amazing) instead.
Well according to a lot of people the Joker is over saturated anyway so I guess it’s a blessing to them right?
Folie-a-doo-doo. I've actually really enjoyed it until the last 20 minutes
It’s weird how they didn’t market this as a musical when it was
Welp. A good reason to see Wild Robot instead.
I won’t be too deep in the video.
2:15 Oh my god. That how I feel when Gotham tv show did with Ed Ngyma, The Riddler. He has spilt personality. That is so lazy. It would been better it these all him bottling all the negative emotions until it broke when he killed Kringle’s abusive boyfriend.
Also the point Joker’s origins is supposed to be a mystery. Like as he said *”A Multiple Choice question”*
I saw that people were saying that the whole movie was basically the producer explaining how upset he was about making the first joker movie because if you remember all the controversy of that first movie. And he didn’t want to make this movie that’s why he kills joker in the end.
I'm just gonna say I'm glad the movie failed. It should show DC not all Batman related projects work so there will be less of them.
A good lesson to learn 😌
Hopefully sony learns that with Spider-man...
Seriously who wants a solo Kraven movie
It obviously went over everyones heads who didn't know the comics
Harvey Dent gets scars on his face after the explosion. So I'm assuming they wanted to use this to build up a Two Face movie. But who even cares now? I just want to forget this movie exists.
Not every nod needs to be setup for a movie universe. Sometimes it can just be a single shot and be more satisfying
so they LITERALLY forced the idea that the Joker we saw won't be the same Joker that a Batman could fight. I'm thankful they didn't force Batman into the plot and had him kill joker
Joker Folie A Doo Doo
I was right that Joker never should have gotten a squeal because the first one was mid at best. The first movie rips off the movie Taxi Driver, a movie from 1976. Joker was pretty much Taxi Driver with DC painted all over it.
This movie hates YOU, the audience that loved the first mid movie, so much that they had to go out of their way just to put Folie a Deux in its title.
😂😂😂😂That intro is crazy!
Me personally I was always subscribed to the idea that Arthur fleck isn’t the actual joker and his actions may have inspired the true joker but the way it was done in this movie was so cheeks
Makes you wonder if this abysmal failure of a movie will make them rethink the Black Label Elseworlds movies or just keep going and show they don't learn from their mistakes.
the title made me laugh for no reason bruh, straightforward review
What concerned me for the movie when Todd Phillips said it’s not gonna be a dc movie like the first one
this movie a perfect example of y writing is so important because that the only thing not good
Joker: Folly of doodoo, featuring Joaquin GooGoo and Lady Gaga, is one of the sequels of all time, right next to Pacific Mid:Unrising
I didn’t even want a joker Movie in the first place
I am just going to pretend that joker didn’t have a sequel
I just hope that in the future no one remembers the sequel so the original remains untarnished in memory
joker fullie a du🗣️🔥
My disappointment is immeasurable
No bro. It's over, It's been over. The Superman movie is gonna be ass I guarantee it. All the movies that did well they ruined. WW? Ruined. Joker? Ruined. Aquaman? Ruined. Shazam? Ruined by: Dwayne The Rock Adam. They fundamentally don't understand what fans want. Whenever they make a good movie they are just as surprised as we are. That's hilarious.
I think that WB just need to learn to stop when they’re ahead, Joker did NOT need a sequel. Greed will be WB’s downfall
As someone who loves musicals…this might be the worst musical I’ve ever seen
I wouldn't have minded a sequal if it focused more on the Joker going to trial, how he's setteling in the mental institution, and how he has influenced his "Fans / supporters" I don't think the Haley Quinn, character was needed.