As an Asian who loves his heritage and would defend it to death if necessary, I say that this blatant historical revisionism of what Role Black people played in British history should not be left unchallenged, not only by whites but by blacks as well. We have a saying in my country that roughly translates to "He who chooses not to look back where he came from, won't make it to where he intends to go." Protect history from revisionism, its key to a country's future.
Why do Asians lead the world in skin bleaching? Why do the hide and suppress all the dark skinned indigenous Asians that are the originals and not pale hybrids?
On that point, did you know that all Japanese accomplishments were actually accomplished by blacks? They design the first samuri sword! Yes it is true. All of the Japanese emperors were black also. Why do only white societies have to put up with this type of video? Why not have blacks dressed up like the royalty in feudal Japan and say that there is a huge oversight that there were a lot of blacks among the Japanese royalty. It seems a bit racist for the BBC to only make historical fiction like this about white societies.
Weird that my ancestry is 100% from England and Scotland and I have no African DNA. Also weird that no African Y-chromosomes appear in any pre-modern British lineages. If Africans were so prominent for so long in Britain, you'd think there would be some kind of genetic footprint for it.
@@richardmangelmann4975 Any evaluation of actual science readily repudiates virtually all of the woke, progressive left's agenda. There is no genetic, archeological or historic evidence for any aspect of any of this.
@@stanleyshannon4408 Ive also never heard of anyone spouting this nonsense in real life, only on the internet. I think most people would scoff at the thought. if you believe it you may be a special kind of extremist
Zion and Babylon are currently destroying the last remnants of true English culture and history. Another reset is coming and I dread the consequences of it. Search for the documentary about the White City of Chicago. The old Abrahamic nations were destroyed in the last one. Her peoples are scattered amongst the Western World and do not (yet) know who they truly are.
Explain to me how an interbred homo sapien with neanderthal dna doesn’t have “African dna”… Your entire genetic makeup is “African” DNA. The only thing that differentiates you is the mutation(recessive genes) through the introduction of Neanderthal dna. When you understand your people are mutations of MY people aka sapiens; you’ll understand why your sun dodging people can’t sleep under the sun. Also understand that this world had multiple global civilizations on every continent all dark skin; as your own science says light skin is a recent gene(mutation). Understand what colonialism is truly about and then just maybe you will understand why your people are frying in Australia, Europe and everywhere else they aren’t supposed to be.
Lets remake 'Shaka Zulu' and have him played by a white guy and present the Zulus as a multi ethnic diverse group.....or would that be totally ridiculous?
@@nobilityjudah5303 No,this is about making fanciful and absurd programmes pretending that there were africans in European society and that they played an important role....it's pathetic and africans would find it highly offensive if we tried to shoehorn europeans into african history...Like I say imagine a white actor playing shaka zulu....it would be completely ridiculous.
I think an interesting topic for a documentary would be to study the reasons why people in the British media are so obsessed with the black race. Obsession to the point of trying to invent a false, Afrocentric narrative to your own history is a very peculiar phenomenon. The biggest question I have overall is why black specifically? Why not, say, East Asians, Polynesians, South East Asians, Indians, Arabs, Native Americans? It's not just the rewriting of history, it's also the massive over representation of blacks in UK media. I was in that country earlier this year for about a week and I watched some of their television. In their commercials it seems that maybe 50-60% of the actors were black. This despite black people making up only 4% of the UK population. For contrast this is less than half of the 9% of the population of South Asian heritage, who seem to receive very little representation in UK advertising. What exactly is going on?
@@peartree460 you could have first asked "what do you mean?" before embarking on your poor attempt at a sarcastic remark but then here we are. Regardless, lemme explain. It's in America that the race problem is greatest. The black Americans through no fault of their own were ripped away from their ancestral homes and their history and put through a lot of terrible things. Certainly there's improvement in their situation compared to that of their ancestors. However, they currently have nothing culturally going for them except for the fact that they're black. In comparison to us in Africa, being black isn't the end all and be all of our existence. All the current African states perhaps with the exception of Ethiopia, are younger than the communities (tribes)they have. Some of us can properly trace our history going back hundreds of years. Being black isn't our end all and be all. Now the reason I say America is the problem, is that currently it's exporting it's culture globally. That makes the rest of the world, to a degree, think that America's problems are also their problems. They forget they've had their culture before the domination of America. That's why Britain, which has a rich history and clear documentation of the same, is currently succumbing to such changes in their history. I could write more but I guess you're already aware of the point I'm trying to make.
"Rethinking" sounds Orwellian like History is a creative process that we make up in our minds, give us facts and evidence not opinions, actors and models.
Nelson Mandela was white. Ok he wasn’t necessarily white, but since a small amount of white people have technically lived in South Africa for centuries, Nelson Mandela should be played by a white actor.
This is a most stupid question I ever read. Nelson mandela was black. And this people explane that there were a small group of black people in the uk. It does not mean that everone in the uk were black! So stop hate about this video!
@@chocoMyCoco Margaret of Anjou was white. BBC cast her with a black actor. All that I’m suggesting is that we do likewise with Nelson Mandela. Fair is fair. If blacks can portray white historical figures, then whites can portray black historical figures.
You said it yourself “he wasn’t necessarily white” so why the hell would a white actor play him? It’s like me saying a black actor should play Joe Biden😭😭😭
@@chocoMyCoco No no, history books have been rewritten. Nelson Mandela was a ginger and 100% white. He had a spray tan. Its a massive conspiracy that he was black. Muhammed Ali was Chinese, but no one knew, until I just revealed it now.
I was hoping this would have some facts and statistics in it that would have illuminated what the real ethnic history of the UK was, perhaps with some surprises? But it's completely empty of any information.
@@AtmaureanNoble7 search 100 turning points in history. I doubt any will be centered around African people. They haven't done anything when it comes to progression for the greater good, or even create any worth while inventions. No ones hiding this history from you, they just aren't teaching you things that didn't happen.
@@christopherbrown8934 searching 100 turning points wouldn't actually have anything to do with real records and place names. A brief synopsis of events you have to be kidding.
What inaccessible documents regarding black history!? You mean things that you dont mention like, the black kings, chieftains , who first sold their captives tribal enemies to European traders ? You never talk about the beginnings of slavery, why is that? Basically if they didn't sell their own countrymen to foreigners there wouldn't have been a European/ colonial slave industry. But black people used their own as slaves and sold their own to become slaves .
For a race that goes around crying about people having a certain hairstyle similar to them, they sure love appropriating other cultures hairstyles and clothing, don’t they?
Jesus Christ this is the dumbest thing I’ve seen all day. A) The people that claim these things are a very few minority. They don’t speak for the majority of black British people. B) The reason these black people in Britain “appropriated” this culture, is because it was forced upon them. Any black person who was taken to England was forced to be baptised, take on a Christian name and act their part. It was forced anglicisation.
Wrong, that style was from the(1:43) Moors. I'm sorry to say, black Africans were the first to have so many different styles even before Europeans came down from cave. The redcoats are you guys style and the pants. The feather is ancient pharaoh style @ (1:26) that wrap around the head is ancient Kemet and Africa.
That would be racist Raymond - it's the sort of thing White Supremacists do. You must believe the fictions the Marxists at the BBC concoct. You are guilty of hate and thought crime if you don't.
oh come on, you do realise that in Nigeria they teach about the construction of the canals in Northern England, in Morocco they teach about Henry the 8th & his 6 wives, & in Ghana they are now preparing a module on the Viking invasion of East Anglia?
To be fair, those African countries have no history of their own to each. Unless you can somehow expand slavery and mud huts into a 4 year course.@@SteeeveO
Boy, if my lived experience in the UK is anything to go by, you are going to have to dig deep for material. I was born in the early 50s in North London and lived in Hampshire (including in a port city), Cheshire and Gloucestershire. No black people were in any the five schools I attended - not in any class at all. Lots of Poles though (despite the Iron curtain). Two Nigerian lads were at Technical College when I went there - the first black people that I had ever met - and the only two in the entire college. Until then, the only black people that I ever saw were on travelogues on television such as the Whicker Report, or the programs of David Attenborough, Armand and Michaela Denis and Desmond Morris - or in news reports. And in American TV programs and on Top of the Pops. Oh, and my parents took me to see a dance troupe from Sierra Leone which performed at Colston Hall in Bristol when I was about 16 years old. That was an education - the dancers wore national dress, so the women were topless, as they were in Kenya and Tanzania in those days. When I started work, still no black people. None at Woolworths, none at Paragon Laundry, none at Marley Concrete Products, no black blackcurrant pickers. I worked in international banking, in a bank with branches in Africa and Asia. There were two Asians in my office, but black people? Go on, guess... None. On my journey to work? A few on London Underground. In the army? None in my unit, but two in another unit I often worked with, and some Fijians, and of course I met plenty on postings outside Europe. By golly, the BBC will have to dig deep to achieve their objective - or make it up. Which will it be? 🤔
The only reason you could not see them is because you were a racist. Blacks were all over all those places, but your racist goggles stopped you from seeing it. I heard that Admiral Nelson was black as was Queen Victoria. Have you heard of the "black Irish?" Yes, they were all black also. People who are black Irish often have huge afros.
@@supersnapp sure queen victoria being black lel i dont see that on her paiting plus non of her children nor grandchildren were black and it doesnt make sense that black ppl who are native to subsaharian africa could be also natives on the other side of the globe
Amazing, Google has removed the dislike count number. This video is false, and its dislikes would be very high. But Google took care of that. Nice Google. My trust in your declines every year.
@@chocoMyCoco There was no African influence on the history of any part of Northwestern Europe. A small number of random black people noted historically is only significant in regard to the ancient literary traditions of the British.
@@julian_arness1320 You're Problem is you're looking at it TODAY. and not BACK THEN. You're ignorance and miseducation is what stands in your way of the REAL TRUTH and REAL HISTORY OF EUROPE. The truth is, Black nobility ruled in Europe for over a Thousand years.
@@johnbrereton5229, same. But I don't think BBC really worries about that. Grabbing the money from TV licence is just a way of 'traditional' finding. In reality the BBC lives on money coming from America (pro-Demo celebs, politicians, and gazillionaires like Gates who wants to "re-educate" us and our kids) + some funding from UK Government. If that source will be cut off, BBC is doomed.
3 minutes in and i am still waiting to 'learn' something from this, no one is named, no deeds are listed..hmmmm is that because it can be fact-checked ? Poor quality BBC
It's funny how Black kids need to be taught a fictitious history of themselves that hugely exaggerates the role they played for their 'self esteem' but those same people say white kids must lean the most awful history of their ancestors....hugely exaggerating their wrongdoing and airbrushing over their incredible achievements.......why? and who exactly is 'racist'?
@Live Truth Black people have been living in Britain since the roman times, more Black people moved to Britain during the Tudor times. Black people were in position of power as during the 15th 17th Britain, 1 law of free soil which meant anyone who came to Britain was free. I bet you think Black people living in Europe during before the 18th century were slaves.
This was such a lazy presentation "with the younger audience (18-24) in mind" you mean adults...give us more context instead of sounding woke without some citation
@@gordonbriggs2345 You mean enslaving.... if you look through black history they spent drastically longer as slavers then slaves.... in fact they people who made them slaves was for them most part their own.
The fact the taxpayer funded BBC is allowed to make 'educational' programmes for kids that tell blatant "black cope" and "black supremacist" lies should be a national scandal.
From the Middle Ages to the 17th century, Europeans depicted Moors as being black, “swarthy,” or “tawny” in skin colour. (Othello, Shakespeare’s Moor of Venice, comes to mind in such a context.) Miranda Kauffman knows this very well, but choose to ignore history
Why do you need her to talk about it , you obviously learned about it without any need of her , so others can learn about it too , it's all available , it's not hidden history.
@@nodruj8681 southern Spain and Portugal, just a short trip across the sea from Morocco , has been invaded many times , the Romans, the carthaginians and whoever came inbetween before the moors , Spain itself had 3 kingdoms ( not inc the moors) who were often at war with each other, Castile, Aragon and Valencia, people in some of those areas still consider themselves as different people to the others . But I'm not surprised that some of them have blue eyes , or lighter skin, from mixed race relationships over the centuries .
Wrong, from the 16th century to the 20th century (i think), moor became a synonym of black in part because of the Atlantic trade, giving birth to the art related to that phenomenon, the blackamoors. Muslims in Spain were never represented as blacks in the middle ages, nor the Arabs nor the Berbers (aka moors) and nor the Iberian converts of course. There are a few representations of blacks related to "moors" during the middle ages because of two reasons though: 1. Trans-Saharan trade, moors imported black slaves, especially women (that's the origin of black matrilineal genetics in northern Africa) 2. Almoravid and Almohad conquests during the 11th century spreading Islam further south and having access not only to black slaves but also manpower like mercenaries, black royal guards were common in North Africa after that.
Clearly the whole presentation is just word salad, largely without meaning. The film was just obviously modern people of colour, dressed up in vaguely period costumes. No wonder the Beeb is in trouble, defund it .
Chinese and Indian peoples have had more of an impact on British culture and society than Afro-Carribean and they continue to do so today. I see no representation for them in this little piece. Afro-Carribeans remain a footnote because they ARE a relative footnote in cultural and demographic terms.
We Were there thousands of years before Chinese and indians even step foot in europe. You"re just on the sidelines. We have more impact on World history PERIOD than both of your groups put together. Chinese and indian people love to hide behind White supremecy knowing they were conquered by them and type cast. We stood at the forefront of society, you're just following whoever is in rulership. This has nothing to do with you.
@@bishno6229 I have more knowledge and truth in my pinky finger than you have in your whole body. you're not on my level. come learn the truth from a real researcher. Me.
I grew up in Manchester in the 1940's and never saw a black person. None of my school photos had any black people in them. No black people shown on Pathe news, no black people on any of the films of the1900's.
Its possible first inhabittant of britain was more dark skin and asian but not afrika . These was sami people ancesters. I m breton and my ancester were brittany. some of us are tan and slanting eyes , they not looking like asian, its little dna but weird . Slanted eyes is comon in finland .
What are the real stories? Honestly I find both black and whites claiming washing of history annoying. Both act offended over what might be facts. I just can't help but roll my eyes. When given new information people often claim it is false because they are stuck and their ways and cannot accept that things may not have been as it was initially taught to them. I've unlearned a lot of the false and misconstrued history from school. I was outraged I was lied to. I can't be mad at the truth.
@@yudelkapaniagua2692 Well it's not that European history isn't broadly documented in orginal sources that I am afraid neither the authors of this video nor the enthusiastic commentators have taken into consideration. Then there are the paintings. Tons of paintings, from Pompeii to the 20th century. Weren't the race hustlers lately complaining that there are so few representations of black people in paintings? You must admit that the theory of one here in the comment section that all the paintings have been "white-washed" later (and nobody ever said a word about it, and no restoration ever discovered the original black face under the white washing?) is rather exhilarating.....
The lie is thinking white people are the original Europeans. Europe was full of MOORS. Europe is home of the MOORS. Look up the history of white washing. It was a law white wash Black peoples out of history but check out The moors. Why are there black people on family crest and images of them all over Europe. Their statues are still there. Y’all walk around like you don’t see those black faces carved into the walls. Check out Russian icons. Black people everywhere.
@@yakiralovesall Stupidity at its very best show me a single family crest from Europe where a black person was displayed or the carving of the image of a black person or even a statue. If will bet my entire wealth on the basis that you cannot show me one. Also instead of practically shitting around, why don't you go and learn about real history. Europe wasn't filled with Moors. The Moors mostly dominated the Iberian peninsula and the islands along the Mediterranean sea on the lands conquered by the caliphates of modern day Arabia after the fall of Roman Empire. Fun fact though, Moors are not black people. They are descendants of Mohammed and the Arabian caliphates. The Christians from the North have been clashing with them for several years until they finally managed to push them out for good. Even heard of Charlemagne and the Spanish reconquista? Just accept the fact, Europe belonged to Europeans
@@oconnor6456 you've never seen it thats why lol. Let alone searched for it. Your thoughts aren't that deep you're seeing the truth for the first time and it's screwing with your programming.
BBC, for gods sake, most people back then were white. If there were that many black people who then mixed, there wouldn't be as many white brits today. Not to mention, we have records of how few black people there were. If there was one, it wouldn't have been seen as normal, they would've stood ou. Indians and middle eastern people were more prevalent tho, why do these people seem to be obsessed with only africans?
The Bible is an ancient black text. 😆. It's time to do your research. First thing you need to do is cone to the realization that you've been taught lies. Read NATURE KNOWS NO COLOR LINE.
@@sunbabbyyy1776 The video was only 3 minutes long. if you want to learn about black history first figure the keywords you need to know in order to find the right videos here on youtube. Like "BLACK ICONS" "RUSSIAN ICONS" "BLACK NOBILITY" "KING JAMES WAS A BLACK MAN" "The Moors in spain" " THE SPANISH INQUISITION" etc. Then look for the right books on amazon LIKE " NATURE KNOWS NO COLOR LINES" and " FROM BABYLON TO TIMBUKTU" " SEX AND RACE" RUSSIAN ICONS. there is where youll find REAL BLACK HISTORY.
So…it’s a fashion shoot? I thought i stumbled in n something incredible based on the lives of each of these figures Instead I literally learned nothing from this. I thought you were about to introduce me to the holy grail of black British historical figures. NOPE! I feel let down.
Actually there have been large numbers of African and Asians coming to the UK over the last 500 years as we traded with the world. Their DNA has intermingled with ours. The problem is the documentation is mostly non-existent. No passports required.
As I understand it, Black people flocked to Britain in the 1400 - 1700's because Britain did not have slavery, unlike Spain, France, Italy and other parts of Europe. Black people were Free in Britain and had rights under the Laws of the Day.
Lol they never blackwashid history in the uk. They explane that there ware a small group or black people that lived in the uka centuries ago. So what is your point?
@@chocoMyCoco It's clear for years now they want to blow out out of proportion the supposed influence of this small and mostly irrrelevant group. Now they even have a black acress playing a historical white royal.
@@ayrton56612 There were in the past a small group black of noble people, some of them were married with the Europe Royals. That explane the look of queen Charlotte. That have noting to do that all royals were black or black actors play Europe Royals. There were black people in Europe that life there for centuries. And the history is never black washing. The history of black people were for long time ignored. That historicus and other people discover some black people that life in Europe, doesn't mean that the history in Europe is black washing.
@@W..949 They paid for Black Panther. And why does there race have to be an issue? I know alot of white people that like Asian cinema too. A Welsh man directed the Raid.
@@muchi1465 I'm correct. The vast majority of history on britannia/great Britain is based on white people as that's been the majority population for 1000s of years. China's history is majority Chinese.
This simply did not tell me anything about black british history before the 20th century. this was simply dress up black people in 16/17/18 century garb and SHOUT we were always here. which allows it to be misinterpreted as suggesting that there has always been a prominent black presence in Britain (which is what ive seen a number of comments disputing) when in reality there have been a number of individuals. no doubt worthy of some mention. but it hardly seems like there has been some deliberate attempt to hide these people from history. probably haven't heard of most of these people becuase they simply didn't have a huge impact on Britain at the time like 98% of all people in the past. And they say they contributed to British history but then havent actually told us what that was or how significant it was. at the end of the day, its easy fodder for white supremacists/nationalists to use to as evidence in their white genocide/ great replacement theories that simply does not need to be handed on a platter for em.
If this is truly an example of what the series has to offer, it seems to be full of false assertions and totally devoid of any factual or evidential material. . Les Griffiths
They still spread these egregiously false lies but now under TH-camrs label of "kids channel" so nobody can comment or refute anything said.. and without the dislike button... So very orwellion
Yep Black Europeans in Europe. Always been there. Misconceptions/lies . Not out of Africa. Black nobility, black hierarchy. Black kings / rulers of Europe England etc facts (already
@Kosmos de Kosmopoliet So don't even TRY to depict yourself as the peaceful educators of your country just because your education system chose to erase all the instances of violence and brutality from your textbooks.
![ค้าง (STILL) - GEMINI [ OFFICIAL MV ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ftxx3hk5vkU/mqdefault.jpg)
As an Asian who loves his heritage and would defend it to death if necessary, I say that this blatant historical revisionism of what Role Black people played in British history should not be left unchallenged, not only by whites but by blacks as well.
We have a saying in my country that roughly translates to "He who chooses not to look back where he came from, won't make it to where he intends to go."
Protect history from revisionism, its key to a country's future.
So what’s your point???
Okay as an Asian, let’s talk about about the block people found in your country who have lived there for centuries.
Let's talk about all the melanated Asians in Asia that keep getting attacked and discriminated against
Why do Asians lead the world in skin bleaching? Why do the hide and suppress all the dark skinned indigenous Asians that are the originals and not pale hybrids?
On that point, did you know that all Japanese accomplishments were actually accomplished by blacks? They design the first samuri sword! Yes it is true. All of the Japanese emperors were black also. Why do only white societies have to put up with this type of video? Why not have blacks dressed up like the royalty in feudal Japan and say that there is a huge oversight that there were a lot of blacks among the Japanese royalty. It seems a bit racist for the BBC to only make historical fiction like this about white societies.
Weird that my ancestry is 100% from England and Scotland and I have no African DNA. Also weird that no African Y-chromosomes appear in any pre-modern British lineages. If Africans were so prominent for so long in Britain, you'd think there would be some kind of genetic footprint for it.
Right? And I mean, isn't great Britain white af? The darker gene is the dominant gene, so by those standards the island couldn't be as white as it is.
@@richardmangelmann4975 Any evaluation of actual science readily repudiates virtually all of the woke, progressive left's agenda. There is no genetic, archeological or historic evidence for any aspect of any of this.
@@stanleyshannon4408 Ive also never heard of anyone spouting this nonsense in real life, only on the internet. I think most people would scoff at the thought. if you believe it you may be a special kind of extremist
Zion and Babylon are currently destroying the last remnants of true English culture and history. Another reset is coming and I dread the consequences of it. Search for the documentary about the White City of Chicago. The old Abrahamic nations were destroyed in the last one. Her peoples are scattered amongst the Western World and do not (yet) know who they truly are.
Explain to me how an interbred homo sapien with neanderthal dna doesn’t have “African dna”… Your entire genetic makeup is “African” DNA. The only thing that differentiates you is the mutation(recessive genes) through the introduction of Neanderthal dna. When you understand your people are mutations of MY people aka sapiens; you’ll understand why your sun dodging people can’t sleep under the sun.
Also understand that this world had multiple global civilizations on every continent all dark skin; as your own science says light skin is a recent gene(mutation). Understand what colonialism is truly about and then just maybe you will understand why your people are frying in Australia, Europe and everywhere else they aren’t supposed to be.
I can't wait for a film in which Rowan Atkinson plays Shaka Zulu.
Id pay to watch that
i'm gonna make a movie and replace all the african tribesmen with white upperclass men
Lmao 🤣 that's what they do but the other way round
Lets remake 'Shaka Zulu' and have him played by a white guy and present the Zulus as a multi ethnic diverse group.....or would that be totally ridiculous?
There were a small group of black people in Europe in the past! What is wrong about that?
@@nobilityjudah5303 yes, slaves...
@@nobilityjudah5303 No,this is about making fanciful and absurd programmes pretending that there were africans in European society and that they played an important role....it's pathetic and africans would find it highly offensive if we tried to shoehorn europeans into african history...Like I say imagine a white actor playing shaka zulu....it would be completely ridiculous.
Whoever controls the past controls the future
INGSOC
@TheGermanDuck yes, really
I think an interesting topic for a documentary would be to study the reasons why people in the British media are so obsessed with the black race. Obsession to the point of trying to invent a false, Afrocentric narrative to your own history is a very peculiar phenomenon. The biggest question I have overall is why black specifically? Why not, say, East Asians, Polynesians, South East Asians, Indians, Arabs, Native Americans?
It's not just the rewriting of history, it's also the massive over representation of blacks in UK media. I was in that country earlier this year for about a week and I watched some of their television. In their commercials it seems that maybe 50-60% of the actors were black. This despite black people making up only 4% of the UK population. For contrast this is less than half of the 9% of the population of South Asian heritage, who seem to receive very little representation in UK advertising. What exactly is going on?
Couldn't agree with you more. This obsession is both bizarre and troubling.
BBC...
Try the urban dictionary
As an African, I I'll tell you why with a single word. Americans.
@@eliazali_4200 because africa never has race wars or ethnic cleansing....
@@peartree460 you could have first asked "what do you mean?" before embarking on your poor attempt at a sarcastic remark but then here we are.
Regardless, lemme explain. It's in America that the race problem is greatest. The black Americans through no fault of their own were ripped away from their ancestral homes and their history and put through a lot of terrible things. Certainly there's improvement in their situation compared to that of their ancestors. However, they currently have nothing culturally going for them except for the fact that they're black. In comparison to us in Africa, being black isn't the end all and be all of our existence. All the current African states perhaps with the exception of Ethiopia, are younger than the communities (tribes)they have. Some of us can properly trace our history going back hundreds of years. Being black isn't our end all and be all. Now the reason I say America is the problem, is that currently it's exporting it's culture globally. That makes the rest of the world, to a degree, think that America's problems are also their problems. They forget they've had their culture before the domination of America. That's why Britain, which has a rich history and clear documentation of the same, is currently succumbing to such changes in their history. I could write more but I guess you're already aware of the point I'm trying to make.
"Rethinking" sounds Orwellian like History is a creative process that we make up in our minds, give us facts and evidence not opinions, actors and models.
Nelson Mandela was white. Ok he wasn’t necessarily white, but since a small amount of white people have technically lived in South Africa for centuries, Nelson Mandela should be played by a white actor.
This is a most stupid question I ever read. Nelson mandela was black. And this people explane that there were a small group of black people in the uk. It does not mean that everone in the uk were black! So stop hate about this video!
@@chocoMyCoco Margaret of Anjou was white. BBC cast her with a black actor. All that I’m suggesting is that we do likewise with Nelson Mandela. Fair is fair. If blacks can portray white historical figures, then whites can portray black historical figures.
You said it yourself “he wasn’t necessarily white” so why the hell would a white actor play him? It’s like me saying a black actor should play Joe Biden😭😭😭
@@chocoMyCoco No no, history books have been rewritten. Nelson Mandela was a ginger and 100% white. He had a spray tan. Its a massive conspiracy that he was black. Muhammed Ali was Chinese, but no one knew, until I just revealed it now.
@@chocoMyCoco this video is garbage, and an insult.
The BBC is George Orwell ministry of truth
What? What that supposed to mean
@@matthewsmith9150 Do some research on George Orwell then read the book 1984. Then you will understand.
@@pauldancy560 u don’t think I know British history, I am the living proof
@@pauldancy560 I’m from Sierra Leone abs my grandma dads dad was a duke but she wasn’t to sure she was just told
@@pauldancy560 do u have any social media so I can tell u what u know from my family side
The BBC needs to be defunded.
I was hoping this would have some facts and statistics in it that would have illuminated what the real ethnic history of the UK was, perhaps with some surprises? But it's completely empty of any information.
Just vague insinuation - bullshit.
Because there is no real ethnic history maybe ???
The CIA can't have that. The bankers control all knowledge given to the public but if one is to truely seek then they will surely find it.
@@AtmaureanNoble7 search 100 turning points in history. I doubt any will be centered around African people.
They haven't done anything when it comes to progression for the greater good, or even create any worth while inventions.
No ones hiding this history from you, they just aren't teaching you things that didn't happen.
@@christopherbrown8934 searching 100 turning points wouldn't actually have anything to do with real records and place names. A brief synopsis of events you have to be kidding.
What inaccessible documents regarding black history!?
You mean things that you dont mention like, the black kings, chieftains , who first sold their captives tribal enemies to European traders ?
You never talk about the beginnings of slavery, why is that?
Basically if they didn't sell their own countrymen to foreigners there wouldn't have been a European/ colonial slave industry.
But black people used their own as slaves and sold their own to become slaves .
For a race that goes around crying about people having a certain hairstyle similar to them, they sure love appropriating other cultures hairstyles and clothing, don’t they?
the movement of the narcissists had be full of contradiction and hypocrisy.
Jesus Christ this is the dumbest thing I’ve seen all day.
A) The people that claim these things are a very few minority. They don’t speak for the majority of black British people.
B) The reason these black people in Britain “appropriated” this culture, is because it was forced upon them. Any black person who was taken to England was forced to be baptised, take on a Christian name and act their part. It was forced anglicisation.
Wrong, that style was from the(1:43) Moors. I'm sorry to say, black Africans were the first to have so many different styles even before Europeans came down from cave.
The redcoats are you guys style and the pants. The feather is ancient pharaoh style @ (1:26) that wrap around the head is ancient Kemet and Africa.
Can the BBC please cite their sources???
Netflix
😂😂
Why wouldn't a white Anglo saxon country focus on white Anglo saxon history?
That would be racist Raymond - it's the sort of thing White Supremacists do. You must believe the fictions the Marxists at the BBC concoct. You are guilty of hate and thought crime if you don't.
oh come on, you do realise that in Nigeria they teach about the construction of the canals in Northern England, in Morocco they teach about Henry the 8th & his 6 wives, & in Ghana they are now preparing a module on the Viking invasion of East Anglia?
@Raymond Bacon 👍👏
To be fair, those African countries have no history of their own to each. Unless you can somehow expand slavery and mud huts into a 4 year course.@@SteeeveO
Boy, if my lived experience in the UK is anything to go by, you are going to have to dig deep for material.
I was born in the early 50s in North London and lived in Hampshire (including in a port city), Cheshire and Gloucestershire. No black people were in any the five schools I attended - not in any class at all. Lots of Poles though (despite the Iron curtain). Two Nigerian lads were at Technical College when I went there - the first black people that I had ever met - and the only two in the entire college.
Until then, the only black people that I ever saw were on travelogues on television such as the Whicker Report, or the programs of David Attenborough, Armand and Michaela Denis and Desmond Morris - or in news reports. And in American TV programs and on Top of the Pops. Oh, and my parents took me to see a dance troupe from Sierra Leone which performed at Colston Hall in Bristol when I was about 16 years old. That was an education - the dancers wore national dress, so the women were topless, as they were in Kenya and Tanzania in those days.
When I started work, still no black people. None at Woolworths, none at Paragon Laundry, none at Marley Concrete Products, no black blackcurrant pickers. I worked in international banking, in a bank with branches in Africa and Asia. There were two Asians in my office, but black people? Go on, guess...
None. On my journey to work? A few on London Underground. In the army? None in my unit, but two in another unit I often worked with, and some Fijians, and of course I met plenty on postings outside Europe.
By golly, the BBC will have to dig deep to achieve their objective - or make it up. Which will it be? 🤔
You are talking about the 50's 😂 try the earlier centuries
The only reason you could not see them is because you were a racist. Blacks were all over all those places, but your racist goggles stopped you from seeing it. I heard that Admiral Nelson was black as was Queen Victoria. Have you heard of the "black Irish?" Yes, they were all black also. People who are black Irish often have huge afros.
@@supersnapp The only black irish I have heard of were the "Black and Tans".
@@outof_mymind and it will be even whiter lol
@@supersnapp sure queen victoria being black lel i dont see that on her paiting plus non of her children nor grandchildren were black and it doesnt make sense that black ppl who are native to subsaharian africa could be also natives on the other side of the globe
Amazing, Google has removed the dislike count number. This video is false, and its dislikes would be very high. But Google took care of that. Nice Google. My trust in your declines every year.
There is no 'Black British History'
There were some black people in the past that lived in Great Britannia. So what is your point?
@@chocoMyCoco There was no African influence on the history of any part of Northwestern Europe. A small number of random black people noted historically is only significant in regard to the ancient literary traditions of the British.
" An enormous amount of our culture centres on the white experience"
Its a white country - what were you expecting 🤣🤣🤣🤣 ...
But it's not 😂
@@outof_mymind But it is.
@@outof_mymind look at the numbers again. Regardless of many half castes being born, it's a very melanin deficient country
@@julian_arness1320 You're Problem is you're looking at it TODAY. and not BACK THEN. You're ignorance and miseducation is what stands in your way of the REAL TRUTH and REAL HISTORY OF EUROPE. The truth is, Black nobility ruled in Europe for over a Thousand years.
@@forayblahzay no proof of the blk nobility of Europe, just crazy theories.
Oh yeah... THAT'S why I ditched my TV license.
Yes, me too !
And a growing number of others, soon the BBC will run out of money to make this bullshit .
@@johnbrereton5229, same. But I don't think BBC really worries about that.
Grabbing the money from TV licence is just a way of 'traditional' finding. In reality the BBC lives on money coming from America (pro-Demo celebs, politicians, and gazillionaires like Gates who wants to "re-educate" us and our kids) + some funding from UK Government. If that source will be cut off, BBC is doomed.
@@ayer2763
The BBC also receives funding from the EU, so no wonder they are always so pro EU.
@@johnbrereton5229, true
Loads of ordinary White people have been overlooked and forgotten too
This video SAID NOTHING WTF
absolute waste of time
3 minutes in and i am still waiting to 'learn' something from this, no one is named, no deeds are listed..hmmmm is that because it can be fact-checked ? Poor quality BBC
It's funny how Black kids need to be taught a fictitious history of themselves that hugely exaggerates the role they played for their 'self esteem' but those same people say white kids must lean the most awful history of their ancestors....hugely exaggerating their wrongdoing and airbrushing over their incredible achievements.......why? and who exactly is 'racist'?
Maybe if you weren't so preoccupied with oppressing everyone else...
@@Lydiard91 i did not oppress anyone ! What planet are you from ?
@@robertanderson6786 I'm joking
This video shows nothing nor name names.. an absolute waste of time...
I love a good good fairy tale.
Yes you r one of course the back bone of being stuck in one :)
There were black people in Europa in the past! That is not a very tale!
@Live Truth Black people have been living in Britain since the roman times, more Black people moved to Britain during the Tudor times. Black people were in position of power as during the 15th 17th Britain, 1 law of free soil which meant anyone who came to Britain was free. I bet you think Black people living in Europe during before the 18th century were slaves.
@@chocoMyCoco It is a fairy tale a stupid one.
@@chocoMyCocoBlack people built everything except for Africa
Stop rewriting British history
The BRITISH HISTORY YOU KNOW and call HISTORY is actually the alternative one thats been REWRITTEN lol.
During the reconstruction era they rewrote his-tory now the true heritage of the land is returned....the great unveiling.
Aaaaah BBC Stories! Say no more,………A classic case of the Dunning-Kruger Effect in full flow
This was such a lazy presentation
"with the younger audience (18-24) in mind" you mean adults...give us more context instead of sounding woke without some citation
When you have no history invent it.
And the BBC will help with the fantasy!!
They have got history slavery
@@gordonbriggs2345 is that it?
@@durrclips746 Yep that's all they got.
@@gordonbriggs2345 You mean enslaving.... if you look through black history they spent drastically longer as slavers then slaves.... in fact they people who made them slaves was for them most part their own.
The fact the taxpayer funded BBC is allowed to make 'educational' programmes for kids that tell blatant "black cope" and "black supremacist" lies should be a national scandal.
From the Middle Ages to the 17th century, Europeans depicted Moors as being black, “swarthy,” or “tawny” in skin colour. (Othello, Shakespeare’s Moor of Venice, comes to mind in such a context.) Miranda Kauffman knows this very well, but choose to ignore history
Why do you need her to talk about it , you obviously learned about it without any need of her , so others can learn about it too , it's all available , it's not hidden history.
Moor simply referred to muslims in spain, the greatest of which was Abd al Rahman iii who was described as white with blue eyes.
@@nodruj8681 southern Spain and Portugal, just a short trip across the sea from Morocco , has been invaded many times , the Romans, the carthaginians and whoever came inbetween before the moors ,
Spain itself had 3 kingdoms ( not inc the moors) who were often at war with each other, Castile, Aragon and Valencia, people in some of those areas still consider themselves as different people to the others .
But I'm not surprised that some of them have blue eyes , or lighter skin, from mixed race relationships over the centuries .
Most Moors were not black. There were few blacks among them.
Wrong, from the 16th century to the 20th century (i think), moor became a synonym of black in part because of the Atlantic trade, giving birth to the art related to that phenomenon, the blackamoors. Muslims in Spain were never represented as blacks in the middle ages, nor the Arabs nor the Berbers (aka moors) and nor the Iberian converts of course. There are a few representations of blacks related to "moors" during the middle ages because of two reasons though:
1. Trans-Saharan trade, moors imported black slaves, especially women (that's the origin of black matrilineal genetics in northern Africa)
2. Almoravid and Almohad conquests during the 11th century spreading Islam further south and having access not only to black slaves but also manpower like mercenaries, black royal guards were common in North Africa after that.
Goebels would be proud 👏
Clearly the whole presentation is just word salad, largely without meaning. The film was just obviously modern people of colour, dressed up in vaguely period costumes. No wonder the Beeb is in trouble, defund it .
Word salad....love it.
What's next? The new Malcolm x movie portrayed by Tom Cruise. This nonsense can go both ways. We don't need lies and inventions to feel better.
What are you talking about?
I've not actually watched this. I have seen similar, and they are too painful. The comments give me hope for the future though.
Chinese and Indian peoples have had more of an impact on British culture and society than Afro-Carribean and they continue to do so today. I see no representation for them in this little piece. Afro-Carribeans remain a footnote because they ARE a relative footnote in cultural and demographic terms.
@Hollow Vegeta² We never gave them their culture, it was more a cultural exchange.
@@saiello2061 WE GAVE THEM THEIR CULTURE. BLACK people were living and ruling in europe a thousand years before caucasians took over.
@@forayblahzay misinformed afrocentrist
We Were there thousands of years before Chinese and indians even step foot in europe. You"re just on the sidelines. We have more impact on World history PERIOD than both of your groups put together. Chinese and indian people love to hide behind White supremecy knowing they were conquered by them and type cast. We stood at the forefront of society, you're just following whoever is in rulership. This has nothing to do with you.
@@bishno6229 I have more knowledge and truth in my pinky finger than you have in your whole body. you're not on my level. come learn the truth from a real researcher. Me.
In 2099, aliens have always been part of our planet.
I grew up in Manchester in the 1940's and never saw a black person. None of my school photos had any black people in them. No black people shown on Pathe news, no black people on any of the films of the1900's.
Its possible first inhabittant of britain was more dark skin and asian but not afrika . These was sami people ancesters.
I m breton and my ancester were brittany. some of us are tan and slanting eyes , they not looking like asian, its little dna but weird . Slanted eyes is comon in finland .
What is this Patriotic Alternative everyone is talking about?
What a load of codswallop.
Nonsense. This and similar historical fantasies belittles real stories about black people in British history
What are the real stories? Honestly I find both black and whites claiming washing of history annoying. Both act offended over what might be facts. I just can't help but roll my eyes. When given new information people often claim it is false because they are stuck and their ways and cannot accept that things may not have been as it was initially taught to them. I've unlearned a lot of the false and misconstrued history from school. I was outraged I was lied to. I can't be mad at the truth.
@@yudelkapaniagua2692 Well it's not that European history isn't broadly documented in orginal sources that I am afraid neither the authors of this video nor the enthusiastic commentators have taken into consideration. Then there are the paintings. Tons of paintings, from Pompeii to the 20th century. Weren't the race hustlers lately complaining that there are so few representations of black people in paintings? You must admit that the theory of one here in the comment section that all the paintings have been "white-washed" later (and nobody ever said a word about it, and no restoration ever discovered the original black face under the white washing?) is rather exhilarating.....
Wow, soooo now we are just straight up lying to people about history? That has always ended well lol
The lie is thinking white people are the original Europeans. Europe was full of MOORS. Europe is home of the MOORS. Look up the history of white washing. It was a law white wash Black peoples out of history but check out The moors. Why are there black people on family crest and images of them all over Europe. Their statues are still there. Y’all walk around like you don’t see those black faces carved into the walls. Check out Russian icons. Black people everywhere.
@@yakiralovesall you are right. This white washing definitely happened as well. In fact I'm 99.999 % positive Hitler was black.
@@yakiralovesall Stupidity at its very best show me a single family crest from Europe where a black person was displayed or the carving of the image of a black person or even a statue. If will bet my entire wealth on the basis that you cannot show me one. Also instead of practically shitting around, why don't you go and learn about real history. Europe wasn't filled with Moors. The Moors mostly dominated the Iberian peninsula and the islands along the Mediterranean sea on the lands conquered by the caliphates of modern day Arabia after the fall of Roman Empire. Fun fact though, Moors are not black people. They are descendants of Mohammed and the Arabian caliphates. The Christians from the North have been clashing with them for several years until they finally managed to push them out for good. Even heard of Charlemagne and the Spanish reconquista? Just accept the fact, Europe belonged to Europeans
No...what you think is history is actually a lie and this video is showing a glimpse into the actual truth.
@@oconnor6456 you've never seen it thats why lol. Let alone searched for it. Your thoughts aren't that deep you're seeing the truth for the first time and it's screwing with your programming.
Wow wearing those clothes is very cultural appropriation. Wear your own clothes next time.
they are his clothes
@Hollow Vegeta² What do you mean?
@@jaybanks2709 I don't think so.
@Hollow Vegeta² What makes you say that?
Time to move to Eastern Europe
Too many blacks on the BBC nowadays and tv in general for my liking its like we live in Africa or something
So I guess that means black people were also responsible for colonialism.
The comment section is gold! Why does BBC pander to blacks so hard?
It's literally called the BBC, they are what they eat.
Is the BBC going to produce any literature so people can actually read this for themselves.
Shaka Zulu was white
BBC, for gods sake, most people back then were white. If there were that many black people who then mixed, there wouldn't be as many white brits today. Not to mention, we have records of how few black people there were. If there was one, it wouldn't have been seen as normal, they would've stood ou. Indians and middle eastern people were more prevalent tho, why do these people seem to be obsessed with only africans?
"But they werent." "I know they werent but what if they were?" "But they werent" "yes I know that but what if they were?"
Blacks: 'British history is shameful...unless we write ourselves into it then it's glorious and Britain is the greatest country in the world'
Let's "rethink" if we are going to pay the licence fee.
Show us the ancient black texts 🤦🏼♀️
The Bible is an ancient black text. 😆. It's time to do your research. First thing you need to do is cone to the realization that you've been taught lies. Read NATURE KNOWS NO COLOR LINE.
@@forayblahzay The word Adam means to blush ?? 🤭
@@chuckb624 literally a lying translation. It's Hebrew Aw-dawm which means Man, Mankind.
@@forayblahzay try Christogena.
@@forayblahzay Christianity is about the race of Adam. Period.
I feel no more enlightened after this video
What a load of bollocks
You cant build a history on fiction
Unless you are the BBC, so they think!. All they will do is ensure their own downfall which, can't come soon enough!
Were is the fiction?
@@nobilityjudah5303 read a history book
Look on TH-cam, Blackpool, London, Sheffield, Birmingham, Manchester, in the 1950s. Spot the black people.
I think Louis Armstrong played Birmingham hippodrome once in the late 50's.........
looked alot better back then too.
UK is a dump now.
Erasure. Identity. Black. Emotive. Hyperbole. Propaganda.
Get out of feelings; you always been lied to everyone else. Red pill
More truth skewing from the BBC.
It is a many reasons I do not watch BBC . That bullshit.
Some real footage pre 1950 might have helped. But young minds don't need that, they can be convinced on this flimsy stuff.
Our new friends hate us and are here to replace us.
As a black person from
The UK… this video told me nothing about black British history 😬
@Hollow Vegeta² okay? Sooo…..
@Hollow Vegeta² they can't handle the truth but everyone has gotta learn some time
Europa was a swarthy goddess 🙏💯💪
@@sunbabbyyy1776 The video was only 3 minutes long. if you want to learn about black history first figure the keywords you need to know in order to find the right videos here on youtube. Like "BLACK ICONS" "RUSSIAN ICONS" "BLACK NOBILITY" "KING JAMES WAS A BLACK MAN" "The Moors in spain" " THE SPANISH INQUISITION" etc. Then look for the right books on amazon LIKE " NATURE KNOWS NO COLOR LINES" and " FROM BABYLON TO TIMBUKTU" " SEX AND RACE" RUSSIAN ICONS. there is where youll find REAL BLACK HISTORY.
@@sunbabbyyy1776 TYPE THIS IN SISTER: King James A Brief History of Black Nobility in Europe
Is this a spoof?
So…it’s a fashion shoot? I thought i stumbled in n something incredible based on the lives of each of these figures Instead I literally learned nothing from this. I thought you were about to introduce me to the holy grail of black British historical figures. NOPE! I feel let down.
This is just ridiculous. Every BBC show has diversity in it, and now they are trying to change the past.
Actually there have been large numbers of African and Asians coming to the UK over the last 500 years as we traded with the world. Their DNA has intermingled with ours. The problem is the documentation is mostly non-existent. No passports required.
As I understand it, Black people flocked to Britain in the 1400 - 1700's because Britain did not have slavery, unlike Spain, France, Italy and other parts of Europe. Black people were Free in Britain and had rights under the Laws of the Day.
How many Black people or their decendents in Britain can show a British birth certificate dated before 1950?
Stop black washhingg European history. Just eduucate people about African history.
Lol they never blackwashid history in the uk. They explane that there ware a small group or black people that lived in the uka centuries ago. So what is your point?
@@chocoMyCoco It's clear for years now they want to blow out out of proportion the supposed influence of this small and mostly irrrelevant group. Now they even have a black acress playing a historical white royal.
@@ayrton56612 There were in the past a small group black of noble people, some of them were married with the Europe Royals. That explane the look of queen Charlotte. That have noting to do that all royals were black or black actors play Europe Royals. There were black people in Europe that life there for centuries. And the history is never black washing. The history of black people were for long time ignored. That historicus and other people discover some black people that life in Europe, doesn't mean that the history in Europe is black washing.
Can we start making TV shows and movies about these historical figures please.
No, they do not exist. It's propaganda.
eon001 I suppose the majority white population will pay for it right?
@@W..949 They paid for Black Panther. And why does there race have to be an issue? I know alot of white people that like Asian cinema too. A Welsh man directed the Raid.
eon001 About Some jester in an Elizabethan court?? They’ve already made Lord Randolph black, so I would really be surprised.
@@Miquelalalaa next: queen elizabeth the first, and how she was african
Nice propaganda tho 👌
What in the bloody hell kind of black supremacist propaganda is this??? 😂
Black people were less than 0.25% of the population during the tudor period so there is hardly any black British history 👍
You wish! Haha
@@muchi1465 I'm correct. The vast majority of history on britannia/great Britain is based on white people as that's been the majority population for 1000s of years. China's history is majority Chinese.
@@sidsnot6952 , do you know anything of the house of coburg/gotha who later became windsor?
The Tudors were black.
th-cam.com/video/u2B8hgT2LKk/w-d-xo.html
This simply did not tell me anything about black british history before the 20th century. this was simply dress up black people in 16/17/18 century garb and SHOUT we were always here. which allows it to be misinterpreted as suggesting that there has always been a prominent black presence in Britain (which is what ive seen a number of comments disputing) when in reality there have been a number of individuals. no doubt worthy of some mention. but it hardly seems like there has been some deliberate attempt to hide these people from history. probably haven't heard of most of these people becuase they simply didn't have a huge impact on Britain at the time like 98% of all people in the past. And they say they contributed to British history but then havent actually told us what that was or how significant it was. at the end of the day, its easy fodder for white supremacists/nationalists to use to as evidence in their white genocide/ great replacement theories that simply does not need to be handed on a platter for em.
Pure and utter embarrassing bunk.
WE WAZ BRITZ N' SHEEEEEEEEEEET.
I mean there are black people in Britain ya know lol calm it down
If this is truly an example of what the series has to offer, it seems to be full of false assertions and totally devoid of any factual or evidential material. .
Les Griffiths
Propaganda, no one is buying. Try harder BBC.🤣🤣
In before the comment section gets locked due to white supremacists.
ArhGee
Exactly!! Get ready for the malicious racist commenting.
@Eric Bowman some confusion? It was the Dutch who took the land from the people. Us Brits took the people from the land
@@yvonce7309 You mean defending our culture which you are trying to steal out of envy.. riiiight
Was this an april 1st joke ?
For the cheap price of burning down a few shoe shops, you too can earn your place in someone else’s ancient history
“Rethinking the black presence.” Translation: Revisionist history
As believable as Narnia or Alice in Wonderland.
They still spread these egregiously false lies but now under TH-camrs label of "kids channel" so nobody can comment or refute anything said.. and without the dislike button... So very orwellion
absolute bollocks and Windrush generation wasn't invited....FACT!!!!
It’s refreshing to think that black history doesn’t start and finish with slavery. Now i need names
Yep Black Europeans in Europe. Always been there. Misconceptions/lies . Not out of Africa. Black nobility, black hierarchy. Black kings / rulers of Europe England etc facts (already
Historical Revisionism.
"Black bodies" Why use this term?
is this a Benny Hill skit??
or little britain??
Which jew was behind this?
What utter misinformation. Desperate or what
Is this gonna be a series?
+Monique Henry Hi Monique, we've already made several films in the series Alt History which you should be able to see in the playlist.
Is it called alt history because it's an alternative to what really happened?
BBC Stories so your reading all the hate comment we write to you , stop black-washing history your ridiculous
What a load of baloney, show me the facts ? What is here is just fancy dress.
Ridiculous changes not true to history
An absolute untruth
Translation here is some bs we made up.
this is such left wing political garbage. It is pathetic, and driven entirely by politics.
Is this a promo or something? I learnt nothing from this video.
It's the first of several films setting up an upcoming series of films.
@Eric Bowman I'm not from the UK so I need your help in explaining what the propaganda is in showing this? What will it achieve?
@Kosmos de Kosmopoliet So don't even TRY to depict yourself as the peaceful educators of your country just because your education system chose to erase all the instances of violence and brutality from your textbooks.
Kosmos de Kosmopoliet agonizingly slow process
@@AngelaGrant2015 it’s advancing the Kalergi plan and revising history of the ethnic British people. It’s part of their erasure