Quantum computing: Facts, fiction and the future

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 68

  • @GoogleDevelopers
    @GoogleDevelopers  6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Check out all the AI videos at Google I/O 2024 → goo.gle/io24-ai-yt

  • @LeoAIHub
    @LeoAIHub 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    As an independent researcher and enthusiast of quantum computing, it’s time to start to look at everything around us and our technology as quantum and quantum data. I dream with the day I will be training a neural network with quantum data converted from classical data. We could stop AI hallucinations and control biases. Good job Google 🎉❤

  • @Cifero-d5m
    @Cifero-d5m 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thank you Charina and Erik for this very interesting explanation and for your ability to explain where you stand. Keep up the good work!

  • @Preppy_Frog
    @Preppy_Frog 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is about early quantum computing in the 2020s and 2030s. It will be significantly more advanced in the 2050s/2080s and into the next century. Classical computing will exist only as a means of human interaction (digital output is easy to convert to human analog input) but everything at the computational level will be quantum based. Video encoding/decoding, 3D rendering, and gaming will all be possible with QCs in the second half of the century, and especially next century. It will be cloud based however, probably subscription based, and heavily monitored, as well as all interactions training AI models, which will likely achieve singularity much sooner.

  • @mmdurfee
    @mmdurfee 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The quantum interactions within the processor, what dataset is used for the computation, materials, and cooling are critical to the "real world" applications of the system. But what is the interface? Is it some command prompt in a stand alone system? Will the public have access? What would that look like?

  • @vykintasglodenis6986
    @vykintasglodenis6986 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Thank you! Very clear and inspiring.

  • @thishandleistacken
    @thishandleistacken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    These talks are good but I highly recommend changing the tone to one that is more academic and less corporate. I think it's also a PR mistake to ignore the obvious military application. By all means focus on defense applications rather than offense... but anyone well read on these subjects knows the main reason these things are being funded. It's nothing to be ashamed of... although it's a scary future it's the same as nuclear energy in terms of the inevitability of benign applications and more insidious ones. If a foreign power used quantum computers to crack all Western secure channels and could organize a hack to take down infrastructure before a larger attack I for one like to know we have people working on technology like this which can protect us

    • @georgeheiner134
      @georgeheiner134 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree, yet the kind of state sponsored effort of an enemy would only convince me that the effort should be above the enemy/ally paradigm we all seem to still embrace. If we want to live through it all, we must finally learn to love our enemies and let the rest go to God.

  • @kurtisbunker7724
    @kurtisbunker7724 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really enjoyed this one. Going to watch it with the older kids later on.

  • @ambrish8144
    @ambrish8144 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great presentation

  • @krfloll
    @krfloll 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The problem with quantum computing is that you need to be a quantum physicist to make meaningful contributions to the software space. I dont a single senior software engineer who is also a quantum physicist. Imbsure they exist but they are probably at google or ibm

  • @navya-s3v
    @navya-s3v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quantum computing has the potential to change industries such as artificial intelligence and machine learning by allowing for faster and more effective algorithms.

  • @Realreal12345
    @Realreal12345 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could we get chapters on this video please?

  • @amitasahasrabudhe6413
    @amitasahasrabudhe6413 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The audience is such a buzzkill. It's demotivating for speakers, too. Great presentation, team!

  • @amiprasis
    @amiprasis 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Are there real human beings in the audience? Or mannequins? Because humans would not have sat that dead in such an event!

  • @natanloterio
    @natanloterio 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    Why the vibe of this keynote is so awkward?

    • @Craig-df8cv
      @Craig-df8cv 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

      What are you talking about? Both the presenters were very coherent, upbeat, and knowledgeable.
      I thought it was great

    • @J3R3MI6
      @J3R3MI6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      $100 says Natan would choke on stage

    • @Ruslan_0990
      @Ruslan_0990 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Maybe they're about to be laid off

    • @EpicWinProMedia
      @EpicWinProMedia 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @craig-df8cv and @J3R3MI6 have points... other than those two handles and your comment I didn't detect anything awkward about this presentation (although maybe if you were under the impression it was a keynote speech, the misalignment of your expectations could have distorted your perception?) *shrug* really, i'm not sure what @amiprasis is on about either, TBH - there WERE cheers, there were questions... curious what level of 'aliveness' you would expect to see?!? it's not exactly a soccer match, ya know? lol i mean attentding these events is LITERALLY a spectator's sport, so... *shrug* ;)

    • @Rareme530
      @Rareme530 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are biased against Google

  • @vtrandal
    @vtrandal 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @4:38 Charina, you say it’s an open question if quantum computers can provide a speedup for classical data like images, etc. I would like to read about that if you have any references to papers about it. So far all I have found is Chris Lomont’s 2003 paper proving quantum convolution is impossible. Maybe hybrid approaches (classical+quantum) can give super-polynomial speedup.

  • @andreasfehlau4965
    @andreasfehlau4965 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quantum error correction cannot be solved if you don't implement the fifth Dimension. And I have noticed certain hints about this by the Chinese, comparable to the implosion of the atomic bomb. By the way, quantum mechanics explains through the fifth dimension what holds the largest and smallest forces together in there cosmological Infinity. Choose your future.

  • @goldnutter412
    @goldnutter412 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    2:26 🥰
    The only problem is that nature makes the difficulty asymmetrical.. perhaps impossible for true ECC

  • @steveknick1978
    @steveknick1978 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hey it’s Charina from the 60 minutes piece, cool! I’m investing in QC for the next 20 years or so, so I’m interested.

  • @moderncontemplative
    @moderncontemplative 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fascinating! 👏🏾

  • @goldnutter412
    @goldnutter412 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    10:10 so the universe supports this because it's actually efficient enough ? the analogy would be that for computational primitives the universe is the conductor.. so the many body system is less complex. From our point of view (ZK output?) it is impossibly more complex the larger the system.
    Outstanding ! go Google🤩

  • @ion_q
    @ion_q 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent! Brilliant!

  • @CruickedReality
    @CruickedReality 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great presentation. Bet you will need a LOT of refrigeration to keep those cold......

  • @julioconradomarinardila3269
    @julioconradomarinardila3269 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Una gran herramienta de trabajo digital y con mucha capacidad del sistema

  • @ANu-px7ds
    @ANu-px7ds 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Charina story of her husband is a fascinating example. Quantum computing would point fingers to established accepted practices. By overlaying data instantaneously. Combined with AI and blockchain would be ???

  • @J3R3MI6
    @J3R3MI6 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Time Crystal we’re super cool.
    Quantum Computer + Q* + Veo 3 = ?

  • @goldnutter412
    @goldnutter412 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quantum phenomena would be more accurate, since the "mechanics" we see look like digital (ZK) outputs
    Same place same time -> no place until required.. (ZK)
    Entangled -> 1 and 0 as 10 or 01 or bit pairing..

  • @gunaysoni6792
    @gunaysoni6792 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All of these speedups are "expected" but we have no demonstrated advantages.

    • @thishandleistacken
      @thishandleistacken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They're classified. Quantum AI is a national defense matter

  • @dadsonworldwide3238
    @dadsonworldwide3238 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't qauntom computing take on the task of helping to streamline existing cause and effects for our new paradigm infrastructure?
    How do we get everyone on the same page to instate curriculum to teach this future ( vast majority useing universal operating systems) to the point Symantecs are all but irrelevant youth are introduced to the workforce quicker and younger ?
    The ratios of cause and effect of what ,where ,when ,why this sector is or isn't properly innovating. Or what happens if this markets buyer ,seller ,producer, investor is placed under one roof in one domain where private individuals can sub contract out they're skills and trade.
    The social infrastructure seems to have astronomical calculations to strengthen or weaken sectors who may lobby us into existential threats .
    Putting systems to work as a tool & and for all the very important & difficult decisions facing agency & institutions plus our major city's where they've really never faced these type of challenges the way say farming had when jethro tull plow was invented.
    I know tech likes to talk about jobs in labor but quite honestly these feilds & industries are conditioned for cutting edge innovation or they wouldn't have survived otherwise.

  • @JasonMayes
    @JasonMayes 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I need to pick someone's brain for the moment at 375 seconds in - cant quite wrap my head around square root of not. Does anyone have more information on that that someone with no quantum background could understand?

    • @croncoder862
      @croncoder862 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      checkout what a Bloch Sphere is, it is in the realm of complex numbers.

    • @JasonMayes
      @JasonMayes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@croncoder862 Thanks

  • @cryptoinside8814
    @cryptoinside8814 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's funny to see how many quantum computing videos there are, but no one is able to explain what quantum computing is.

    • @DagelanAI
      @DagelanAI 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You are looking for the wrong place here, they are developers who are looking for information on the progress of Quantum Computing itself

    • @cryptoinside8814
      @cryptoinside8814 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DagelanAI Still no one can explain it. It’s just a bunch of gibberish and guesswork. People who are working on it don’t really understand it either.

    • @thishandleistacken
      @thishandleistacken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@cryptoinside8814that's untrue a friend of mine works directly with quantum computing in pharmacology and can both explain it and explain how it'll help the world (but also put us in immense danger, similar to the duality of nuclear energy which can be harnessed to save or to demolish). You need to learn some classical physics then read up on the history of the quantum revolution with Bohr and Einstein and others and work your way up but there are basic explanations out there if you stick to academically sound sources

  • @spiridonnspiridonn4596
    @spiridonnspiridonn4596 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Об интеллектуальных поисках квантовых компьютерщиков при помощи Сферы Блоха.
    На мой арифметически простой взгляд, Сфера Блоха - это *не* физический объект. Можно сказать, что это условное вспомогательное мнемоническое представление о характере взаимодействия физических объектов. Природа не оперирует в соответствии с подобными трансцендентными представлениями. Поэтому на их основе невозможно строить логически правильные умозаключения о практической реализации этих представлений.
    19.09.2024.

    • @spiridonnspiridonn4596
      @spiridonnspiridonn4596 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      На интуитивном уровне предполагаю, что Природа оперирует квантовыми процессами в первую очередь в соответствии с симметричными кристаллографическими соотношениями.
      19.09.2024.

  • @denisonbea6726
    @denisonbea6726 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When I see these brilliant brains, I feel myself like a mite eating leftovers in a carpet on a floor.

  • @elliptictree
    @elliptictree 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting

  • @jackwt7340
    @jackwt7340 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    better than IBM

    • @thishandleistacken
      @thishandleistacken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What for your investments? Why are most people here only here for some competition between Western companies when the reality is they are all working to ensure we aren't leap frogged by governments that want to destory us... Yes they compete but there are also a classified collaborations. For example I can neither say for sure whether it is true what they said about quantum computers not having surpassed super classical computers. Such a development would mean far too much for national defense to make a corny presentation about

  • @desireemariec1108
    @desireemariec1108 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “our existence”
    Fine.

  • @YoghurtEquity
    @YoghurtEquity 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why they keep waiting for claps and cheers that never come? 💀

  • @TheKumarAshwin
    @TheKumarAshwin 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The golden question is "what is the future of search engine after Chat GPT?"

  • @pacanosiu
    @pacanosiu 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You are funny with your AI and this quantum circus

  • @Isiwbduanfi
    @Isiwbduanfi 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Google - where no good engineer will stay more than a year (Meta / AWS - no more than a month).. no ethics at all in these companies..

  • @JayDee-b5u
    @JayDee-b5u 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm not sure there's any substance here.

    • @SteelBlueVision
      @SteelBlueVision 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Because there is no substance here. The only substance here can be expressed as: CPUs were getting faster (and they were - past tense) and will continue to get faster just like they have been (flat out speculation, proven to be false).

    • @thishandleistacken
      @thishandleistacken 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@SteelBlueVisionthe talk was corny and a little basic but that's mot quite right.. there's a limit to classical chips that only quantum could surpass such as trivializing much of our current encryption standards, allowing for quantum secure channels, allowing for the coordinating of quantum AI controlled unmanned devices, optimizing supply chain logistics etc. Most of this stuff is far more about military applications than whether or not it can run videogames n such.

  • @goednieuwskrantje-nl
    @goednieuwskrantje-nl 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The dialogue sounds almost as bad as a bad AI voice and the screen looks similar to a boring generic wordpress website. P.S. I guess i am lucky i don't have to verify my identity with a phone to post this reply