You can probably find the video I origially got it from, I think it has like the exact same title as this video. And that video was basically "in 1985 there was X many remakes equals Y procent." and after looking through it the procent number was kind of consistent.
william timonen I agree it's not a new thing but now that we are a social media/internet culture we can all get information on just about anything so for that reason it's more in our face
10:43-10:47 u got me scared right there man just the fact that modern Hollywood does nothing but give us an endless series of pointless remakes and reboots and are gonna continue doing it really gives me no hope for the future there's gonna come a point where a large majority of other movie fans are gonna tired of this pure stubborn laziness and they'll want fresh new ideas on screen
Making a remake/reboot doesn't really bother me that much. It's always interesting to see a fresh take on a old classic though more often then not, the remakes fall short of the mark. What really pisses me off is when they remake a movie that is less then 10 years old.
If you ask me, a film should only be rebooted if it has great potential, but wasn't much of a success like The Black Cauldron or Atlantis: The Lost Empire
I don't feel like I'm enough of a cinematic nerd to talk about reboots and remakes without forty people telling me how much of a simpleton I am for not going to film school, so I'll just say this. (Opinions and big paragraphs ahead, captain!) When you were talking about capturing the spirit and feeling of a movie and then mentioned Poltergeist (or vice versa, my memory is a bit spotty), you reminded me of how Insidious (the first one) made me feel. I really enjoyed the original Poltergeist and thought it was unique in its interpretation of ghosts and the otherworldly. I remember immediately after I saw Insidious I texted my mom (who also enjoys scary movies and has her own personal thoughts on Poltergeist thanks to the possessed clown doll) and told her it felt like a spiritual successor to Poltergeist. I know they're very different, but they made me feel the same, and I think that's why I like it so much. It took a concept and did a creative spin off of it. Again, those are my own thoughts. I'm sure I'm going to get ambushed by people trying to teach me how bad Insidious is or that I'm "actual cancer" because I "DARE" compare it to Poltergeist, but eh. Get over it. I love both movies, and I think I'd like to see more "reimaginings" like that, where one feels inspired by the other. Not so much that it feels like a bootleg or rip off, but just enough that it feels like a love letter to the original film/book/game/etc. I suppose that explains why I like Undertale so much, too; it's original in its own ways, but it does have that feeling to it that the creator was thinking of a certain other work that they enjoyed. I know that's exactly Undertale's case, though I don't know about Insidious. I'm sure someone will let me know in a reply if the director was going for a little throwback to Poltergeist. I don't know. Just musing, I guess. Also three times more likely to get smothered by that classic zinger "cancer" because I mentioned Undertale, but oh well. I've been through worse.
It's not that Hollywood has run out of ideas. It's just that they're not willing to take a risk making something original in fear of losing money. There have been original films coming out and still are. Last year, we got a whole shit-load. The problem is that audiences care less about originality than even the Hollywood executives do. I'm sorry but if you're gonna constantly bitch and moan about how original movies are almost non-existent(which is bullshit BTW) then actually do something about! Don't just sit on your asses complaining on the Internet all the time and then contradict yourselves by going to see a reboot, sequel or adaptation! I mean, has anybody even seen The Nice Guys? No? Then what about Hail, Caesar? Nobody saw that? What about Kubo and the Two Strings? Wait, you saw Suicide Squad instead? Pathetic! See what I mean? You people act like you want more original films to come out in theaters and be successful when in reality, you don't. I bet you're doing it on purpose just so you have an excuse to badmouth Hollywood and accuse them for being "out of ideas" even though it's your own fucking fault for letting this happen in the first place. How much do you wanna bet that you're not gonna give a shit about any of the original films coming out this year? Colossal. Atomic Blonde. Baby Driver. The Shape of Water. Coco(Okay, maybe that one will do fine but still) Just to name a few. WAKE UP, PEOPLE! Don't just sit there thinking Hollywood is dead! Actually go out and support original works by actually paying to see them! Just get on with it! Yes! Get on with it! C'MON! GET ON WITH IT! Random commenter: "But... we're finally getting a Dark Tower movie. I've always wanted to see those books adapted for the big-screen" GET ON WITH IT!!!!! Random commenter: "Oh fine" **checks IMDB for release dates for upcoming original films**
While you were kind of harsh with what you said there, I can honestly agree with everything being told. Also, love the Monty Python reference at the end.
Because film producers and studios are afraid to take risks with something people are not familiar with. They always play it safe and go with something people are familiar with and try to make cash off of it.
Yeah, I don't plan to work in a major Hollywood studio anytime soon. If anything, I'd rather work independently. KEEO YOUR REMAKES AND FRANCHISES AWAY FROM ME!
After watching this back when it was uploaded in 2017 and watching this now, I think AniMat can include last year’s live-action remake of The Lion King on the list of live-action remakes based on Disney animated classics that were the most highly successful film of its year and then forgotten by the public and Disney itself to return its focus on the original. Update: Also include Mulan (2020), Pinocchio (2022) and Peter Pan & Wendy (2023) on that list.
I forgot about Disney's live action Mulan, Pinocchio and Peter pan and Wendy happened after they came out. I a least remember Tim Burton's Alice in wonderland and Sleeping beauty remakes Heck I liked The jungle book remake.
Honestly I don't mind the fact that reboots and remakes exist because well a lot of stories told throughout history have been in a way remakes of their own. I mean a lot of the Brothers Grimm fairy tales were adapted from a lot of folk stories around the world so truth be told a lot of stories aren't exactly original 100% so I don't see why movies should be thought differently. Also the reason why I'm personally excited for the Monsterverse because it offers a fight between Godzilla and Kong that people never thought it'd happen again. There's also times where reboots and remakes tend to fix problems the previous movies have when done right so I don't think we need to see them stop just tell them to do it right.
The tension between the business and the art of movie making will unfortunately always be something that affects the industry for better or worse. The good thing is, there are some studios (like Pixar, for example) that have a healthy balance of "safe" releases and "risky" original releases. They intelligently craft high quality sequels that bring in money to spend on original stories and films. Thankfully, they value their original stories more than the idea of making money from sequels!
The only time when a movie should be reboot/remade is to breath new life into it. But nowadays, it just seems like Hollywood's cashing in on franchises rather than delivering actual good remakes/reboots, sadly.
This kind of reminds me anime adaptations of manga. Even with Ghost in the Shell being adapted into live action. It's easier to get money from an already existing fan base than creating something original.
On a positive note, one reboot I consider better than the original is Thomas and Friends: The Adventure Begins. It's essentially a reboot of the first half of the first season. As far as specifics go, what it does right is all in the writing and character interaction. Sure, it's easy to point out the individual stories, but they do flow nicely as one large one. The character interaction also adds more that works than what was just offered in narration. The only thing the original did better was the visuals and even then, the remake didn't slouch.
They have time to time again getting something original made and it can be a hit like Everything everywhere all at once won best picture among other Oscars and awards and was a big hit for its studio.
Good video, but I remember writing a paper on the business of film and how hollywood is making too many remakes... in 2002!, I'm not expecting this trend to change.
Well, that's only because audiences care less about originality than even the executives do. Why else would films like Hail, Caesar, Nice Guys and Kubo bomb?
When Star wars, Mad max and Dumbo were originally released, they were original as time moved on though it changed as they would get sequels, video games and even comics as now everyone knows them and compare them to other things now.
However reboots and remakes can be good if they are handled directed and written well until the right hands by the right person. For example, like me I want to be become a director one day to make a Ratchet and Clank movie reboot/remake. My own film version will fix all the problems what the other film had like make Ratchet and Clank likable characters and make them a bond connection like real friends. Focused on great writing, great directing, focused great story and character development and great animation on the film. It will still focused on the original source material and it will be retelling to the audience of the video games. I want my film version of Ratchet and Clank to be the best animated space science fictional film since Treasure Planet.
If I was director and I was going to remake any animated film it'd be How to Train Your Dragon. I know people love those film but they do an extremely poor job at representing the books they're based off of. I mean the logic of the 2nd film with the whole dragons only ever do bad things cause they were raised by bad people/the alpha controls them all went against everything the dragons were in the books.(Even contradicts what is seen in the 1st film and series) And that whole ending were Toothless essentially went Super Saiyan and became the king of all dragons was nonsensical to say the least!
Now we’ve got the upcoming fifth Indiana Jones that looks like it’s going to ignore the fourth film. There are a few reasons to this. Mutt Williams is not returning in the fifth film, so the fifth film is going to pretend he doesn’t exist and Karen Allen hasn’t been reported to reprise her role as Marion Ravenwood, so it looks like they’re going to ignore that Indy and Marion married at the end of the 4th film.
reboots, remakes, no new ideas really have been around a long time. A lot of movies from the 30s,40s, 50s, and 60s have been remade. What people want is quality. Not making people happy is one reason to reboot a film series. Thing out, its hard to figure out what audiences want. Also a lot of times Nostalgia blinds us to what made old movies really bad. Hollywood also tends to value what celebrity is in a movie over weather that celebrity was right for the film and it tends to think that live action will be better then animation. Look at superman as an example. Its an adaptation of a comic book, its a movie based on a tv show, its theme song was the best thing about it, two of its sequels flat out sucked, it had blatant product placement, celebrity star power, it was better in animation then in film, it tried to do a remake as faithful as possible to the old films and it did a remake based on the successful trend of "darker and more realistic" and it tried to follow the success of its rivals.
I don’t mind but I do think it shouldn’t stop original or new movies (which honestly there are so many movies based on books that haven’t been adapted yet that come out all the time)
I love the 2016 version of Ghostbusters, it has a great cast, funny jokes (in my opinion), and new characters... However I do admit there are a handful of mistakes (didn't stop me from buying the extended edition though😂)
Though Fantastic Mr. Fox was based on a children’s book by Roald Dahl. But Wes Anderson’s usual style and direction he added to the film adaptation actually makes it unique from other film adaptations of Roald Dahl books and makes it almost feel like an original animated film from the mind of Wes Anderson.
@@hunterolaughlin Oh of course, I was mostly referring to his other works like Isle of Dogs, which was also fantastic. But even he knows how to make good adaptations, and I would love to see him make another adaptation of something.
mtownboi4ya Not the ones from movies that are less than 10 years old! Please Hollywood, just remake/reboot oldie movies that nobody cares about anymore!
If I can be honest, out of all the remakes/reboots I've seen....I'd say the 1990 Night of the Living Dead is the best. Basically shot-for-shot remake but it's actually decent imo.
Remakes and Reboots are a source of easy money because the ensure that people will go and see them. That is why the Studios make them to gather profit. And the profit is used for rather riskier projects which might also start a new franchise. So in the end, the Remakes keep the producers alive, to be able to make their job.
Speaking of remakes, AniMat, if you've ever watched Nostalgia Critic's "Old vs. New" video series, which remakes talked about in those videos do you think are the superior versions? To help you remember, here's the list: 1. Batman (1989) vs. The Dark Knight 2. Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings vs. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers 3. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory vs. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory 4. The Nutty Professor (1963) vs. The Nutty Professor (1996) 5. King Kong (1933) vs. King Kong (2005) 6. The Ten Commandments (1957) vs. The Prince of Egypt 7. The Karate Kid (1984) vs. The Karate Kid (2010) 8. True Grit (1969) vs. True Grit (2010) 9. Manhunter vs. Red Dragon 10. Sam Raimi's Spider-Man Trilogy vs. The Amazing Spider-Man 1 & 2 11. Cinderella (1950) vs. Cinderella (2015) 12. The Evil Dead (1981) vs. Evil Dead (2013)
Nostalgia is GOOD. However, disney, wokism, and remakes (for mere remakes) ARE NOT! Remakes while infused with wokeness is WROSE!! (What is 'IP Suicide'? It is: IP Legacy + IP Nostalgia + Wokism = IP Suicide). But.. Nostalgia?? "Nostalgia is GOOD" - statement, on its own. Plus, Nostalgia is VERY GOOD ((IF)) done right. But Nostalgia as ~Nostalgia~?? On its own? Is generally good!! :-) Nostalgia is not something negative, it is something positive, wither exploited or not. But, people don't understand, Nostalgia is something positive!! It is good!! Hence it gets exploited. But, if done right? The IP SHINES!! ESPECIALLY WITH IT'S CORE FANBASE!! Only a sinister, hateful, resentful, angry, narcissistic individual will WEPONISE an IP and its Nostalgia to push their personal agenda/ hate/ anger/ "revange". Such individuals should be marked, removed and ostercised. People should avoid such destructful evil individuals.
"Hollywood is unoriginal and they love money"
- Ralphthemoviemaker
2:28 what's this episode or editorial of the Nostalgia Critic?! I don't remember seeing this once before!
Like Steven speilberg said, it's not a reboot, it's a reimagining
Is it mr. Speilberg is it.
7 years later & it's still a problem
I feel like it's been 2 decades since I've seen someone in a shirt like that! Lol
Someone did the math on it, and there has always been alot of reboots. Its just that people recognise it more now.
william timonen Source?
Because I highly doubt that
Not where I heard it first, but here is first google result. stephenfollows.com/hollywood-remakes-and-reboots/
You can probably find the video I origially got it from, I think it has like the exact same title as this video. And that video was basically "in 1985 there was X many remakes equals Y procent." and after looking through it the procent number was kind of consistent.
william timonen I agree it's not a new thing but now that we are a social media/internet culture we can all get information on just about anything so for that reason it's more in our face
10:43-10:47 u got me scared right there man
just the fact that modern Hollywood does nothing but give us an endless series of pointless remakes and reboots and are gonna continue doing it really gives me no hope for the future
there's gonna come a point where a large majority of other movie fans are gonna tired of this pure stubborn laziness and they'll want fresh new ideas on screen
There are tons of movies released every year that aren't sequels, remakes, or adaptations. You just choose to ignore them.
GameStation3 I do. I barely went to the movies last year
I probably only saw 3 or 4 movies last year
Peter Jackson's King Kong is my favorite remake.
A professional always knows what makes a movie better than a fan does.
It helps when a filmmaker is both a pro and a fan of a classic.
Making a remake/reboot doesn't really bother me that much. It's always interesting to see a fresh take on a old classic though more often then not, the remakes fall short of the mark. What really pisses me off is when they remake a movie that is less then 10 years old.
If you ask me, a film should only be rebooted if it has great potential, but wasn't much of a success like The Black Cauldron or Atlantis: The Lost Empire
I don't feel like I'm enough of a cinematic nerd to talk about reboots and remakes without forty people telling me how much of a simpleton I am for not going to film school, so I'll just say this. (Opinions and big paragraphs ahead, captain!)
When you were talking about capturing the spirit and feeling of a movie and then mentioned Poltergeist (or vice versa, my memory is a bit spotty), you reminded me of how Insidious (the first one) made me feel. I really enjoyed the original Poltergeist and thought it was unique in its interpretation of ghosts and the otherworldly. I remember immediately after I saw Insidious I texted my mom (who also enjoys scary movies and has her own personal thoughts on Poltergeist thanks to the possessed clown doll) and told her it felt like a spiritual successor to Poltergeist. I know they're very different, but they made me feel the same, and I think that's why I like it so much. It took a concept and did a creative spin off of it.
Again, those are my own thoughts. I'm sure I'm going to get ambushed by people trying to teach me how bad Insidious is or that I'm "actual cancer" because I "DARE" compare it to Poltergeist, but eh. Get over it. I love both movies, and I think I'd like to see more "reimaginings" like that, where one feels inspired by the other. Not so much that it feels like a bootleg or rip off, but just enough that it feels like a love letter to the original film/book/game/etc. I suppose that explains why I like Undertale so much, too; it's original in its own ways, but it does have that feeling to it that the creator was thinking of a certain other work that they enjoyed. I know that's exactly Undertale's case, though I don't know about Insidious. I'm sure someone will let me know in a reply if the director was going for a little throwback to Poltergeist.
I don't know. Just musing, I guess. Also three times more likely to get smothered by that classic zinger "cancer" because I mentioned Undertale, but oh well. I've been through worse.
Movie studios have to make the movie or lose the rights to that movie. So they will remake the same movie every few years to hold onto the rights.
Modern Day Hollywood sucks.
micshork 70% is at least
it may suck but alot are enjoyable so I guess it works
micshork I miss the golden age of Hollywood.
Brian Kent Pirrie - Gone With the Wind is an adaptation.
GameStation3 best epic movie of 1939.
It's not that Hollywood has run out of ideas. It's just that they're not willing to take a risk making something original in fear of losing money.
There have been original films coming out and still are.
Last year, we got a whole shit-load. The problem is that audiences care less about originality than even the Hollywood executives do.
I'm sorry but if you're gonna constantly bitch and moan about how original movies are almost non-existent(which is bullshit BTW) then actually do something about!
Don't just sit on your asses complaining on the Internet all the time and then contradict yourselves by going to see a reboot, sequel or adaptation!
I mean, has anybody even seen The Nice Guys? No?
Then what about Hail, Caesar? Nobody saw that?
What about Kubo and the Two Strings? Wait, you saw Suicide Squad instead? Pathetic!
See what I mean?
You people act like you want more original films to come out in theaters and be successful when in reality, you don't.
I bet you're doing it on purpose just so you have an excuse to badmouth Hollywood and accuse them for being "out of ideas" even though it's your own fucking fault for letting this happen in the first place.
How much do you wanna bet that you're not gonna give a shit about any of the original films coming out this year?
Colossal.
Atomic Blonde.
Baby Driver.
The Shape of Water.
Coco(Okay, maybe that one will do fine but still)
Just to name a few.
WAKE UP, PEOPLE!
Don't just sit there thinking Hollywood is dead! Actually go out and support original works by actually paying to see them!
Just get on with it!
Yes! Get on with it!
C'MON! GET ON WITH IT!
Random commenter: "But... we're finally getting a Dark Tower movie. I've always wanted to see those books adapted for the big-screen"
GET ON WITH IT!!!!!
Random commenter: "Oh fine" **checks IMDB for release dates for upcoming original films**
FANATIC PLANET Productions I loved the nice guys
So did I and good for you.
FANATIC PLANET Productions You have the best comment in this section.
While you were kind of harsh with what you said there, I can honestly agree with everything being told.
Also, love the Monty Python reference at the end.
Finaly someone with a brain
Also Coco will do fine because Disney has the money to promote it properly and the power of Disney and Pixar logos.
Mary Poppins Returns was a great reboot/sequel, it captures the original's spirit, the music sounds just like it's come from the original
Why cannot they do the same to other IPs? Why do they have to push a woke agenda in every other IP?
Because film producers and studios are afraid to take risks with something people are not familiar with. They always play it safe and go with something people are familiar with and try to make cash off of it.
Yeah, I don't plan to work in a major Hollywood studio anytime soon. If anything, I'd rather work independently. KEEO YOUR REMAKES AND FRANCHISES AWAY FROM ME!
To answer the titel of the video:
To cash in on nostalgia
After watching this back when it was uploaded in 2017 and watching this now, I think AniMat can include last year’s live-action remake of The Lion King on the list of live-action remakes based on Disney animated classics that were the most highly successful film of its year and then forgotten by the public and Disney itself to return its focus on the original.
Update: Also include Mulan (2020), Pinocchio (2022) and Peter Pan & Wendy (2023) on that list.
I forgot about Disney's live action Mulan, Pinocchio and Peter pan and Wendy happened after they came out. I a least remember Tim Burton's Alice in wonderland and Sleeping beauty remakes Heck I liked The jungle book remake.
Kong:skull island really isn't a remake though
I have never so been early on a Animat video before!
Ironically, they're also remaking Jumanji.
holytriplem now tomb raider. yuck
But that turn out funny
I thought that was the sequel
Kinda weird.
Because that movie had almost nothing to do with the original.
Do you know what's doubly ironic? The fact it's actually kinda good!
Honestly I don't mind the fact that reboots and remakes exist because well a lot of stories told throughout history have been in a way remakes of their own. I mean a lot of the Brothers Grimm fairy tales were adapted from a lot of folk stories around the world so truth be told a lot of stories aren't exactly original 100% so I don't see why movies should be thought differently.
Also the reason why I'm personally excited for the Monsterverse because it offers a fight between Godzilla and Kong that people never thought it'd happen again. There's also times where reboots and remakes tend to fix problems the previous movies have when done right so I don't think we need to see them stop just tell them to do it right.
Hey I like beauty and the beast remake because of chip!! 🥰🥰🥰🥰
The tension between the business and the art of movie making will unfortunately always be something that affects the industry for better or worse. The good thing is, there are some studios (like Pixar, for example) that have a healthy balance of "safe" releases and "risky" original releases. They intelligently craft high quality sequels that bring in money to spend on original stories and films. Thankfully, they value their original stories more than the idea of making money from sequels!
The only time when a movie should be reboot/remade is to breath new life into it. But nowadays, it just seems like Hollywood's cashing in on franchises rather than delivering actual good remakes/reboots, sadly.
This kind of reminds me anime adaptations of manga. Even with Ghost in the Shell being adapted into live action. It's easier to get money from an already existing fan base than creating something original.
Well said. I've been wanting to say this for years.
Honestly when it comes to the disney reboots, I'd have to say at least The Jungle Book actually improved upon the original, which was only meh.
I just saw Beauty and the Beast, it's really beautiful. But seriously, rebooting is getting out of hand.
Gonna get that money eh?
Only the truest Epic Mickey fan casually namedrops Wasteland in the middle of a speech. I highly approve.
Dude, I am surprised you haven't made a movie about the Coco trailer.
I think GoodBadFlicks made interesting points on how unnecessarily remakes, reboots, and re-adaptations are turning out to be.
On a positive note, one reboot I consider better than the original is Thomas and Friends: The Adventure Begins. It's essentially a reboot of the first half of the first season. As far as specifics go, what it does right is all in the writing and character interaction. Sure, it's easy to point out the individual stories, but they do flow nicely as one large one. The character interaction also adds more that works than what was just offered in narration. The only thing the original did better was the visuals and even then, the remake didn't slouch.
We can all agree that most remakes will never top peak that are the original classics.
If you wanna see a good remake, go watch the 1997 made for tv remake of the love bug.
If you want to get technical, Frozen is part of franchise, Disney to be exact.
2:10 lol the mystery machine
I've been wondering about this for a long time now. At the same time, I even think: Will Hollywood ever return to making more original movies?
They have time to time again getting something original made and it can be a hit like Everything everywhere all at once won best picture among other Oscars and awards and was a big hit for its studio.
Good video, but I remember writing a paper on the business of film and how hollywood is making too many remakes... in 2002!, I'm not expecting this trend to change.
Hollywood writers are getting lazy. It’s easier to just remake a movie and gamble it will sell then to use some thought into making an original movie.
where is the review for rock dog
But force awkans and jurraisc world are sequls not reboots
Thanks to the 2007 Writers Strike, Hollywood is lacking any good ideas
What about Zootopia, Inside Out, or many other animated movies lately?
Well, that's only because audiences care less about originality than even the executives do.
Why else would films like Hail, Caesar, Nice Guys and Kubo bomb?
Anyone ever told you that you look like the older brother from The Goldbergs?
0:44 Ahem,you can go see LOGAN!!!That movie is awesome!
So why is the bayformers series doing so well again?
Holden Games:
Holden's gourmet kitchen.
Holding Brawl Royale.
Holden Turbo Kart.
Holden party.
Alternative:
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST LITERALLY JUST CAME OUT
When Star wars, Mad max and Dumbo were originally released, they were original as time moved on though it changed as they would get sequels, video games and even comics as now everyone knows them and compare them to other things now.
You said it, you can say that again.
"Why the big re-make boom now?" Money, dear boy.
Do you have a channel we're you review non-animated movies?
However reboots and remakes can be good if they are handled directed and written well until the right hands by the right person. For example, like me I want to be become a director one day to make a Ratchet and Clank movie reboot/remake. My own film version will fix all the problems what the other film had like make Ratchet and Clank likable characters and make them a bond connection like real friends. Focused on great writing, great directing, focused great story and character development and great animation on the film. It will still focused on the original source material and it will be retelling to the audience of the video games. I want my film version of Ratchet and Clank to be the best animated space science fictional film since Treasure Planet.
If I was director and I was going to remake any animated film it'd be How to Train Your Dragon. I know people love those film but they do an extremely poor job at representing the books they're based off of. I mean the logic of the 2nd film with the whole dragons only ever do bad things cause they were raised by bad people/the alpha controls them all went against everything the dragons were in the books.(Even contradicts what is seen in the 1st film and series) And that whole ending were Toothless essentially went Super Saiyan and became the king of all dragons was nonsensical to say the least!
what happen to your rock dog review
I smell a new trend in tge 2020’s; Sequels officially retconing other sequels/reboots! (I.e. Ghostbusters III, RoboCop Returns)
Now we’ve got the upcoming fifth Indiana Jones that looks like it’s going to ignore the fourth film. There are a few reasons to this. Mutt Williams is not returning in the fifth film, so the fifth film is going to pretend he doesn’t exist and Karen Allen hasn’t been reported to reprise her role as Marion Ravenwood, so it looks like they’re going to ignore that Indy and Marion married at the end of the 4th film.
4:24 Why are you showing a clip of an Apple Event??? (And before you call me dumb...)
I feel like it wont be long until they do something like remake Citizen Kane. I mean ffs they already remade Ben-Hur and The Birth of a Nation.
Theragonslayer They remade Birth of a Nation?
RespectedSalmon yup, it was released last year. got a 71% certified fresh on rt
reboots, remakes, no new ideas really have been around a long time. A lot of movies from the 30s,40s, 50s, and 60s have been remade. What people want is quality. Not making people happy is one reason to reboot a film series. Thing out, its hard to figure out what audiences want. Also a lot of times Nostalgia blinds us to what made old movies really bad. Hollywood also tends to value what celebrity is in a movie over weather that celebrity was right for the film and it tends to think that live action will be better then animation. Look at superman as an example. Its an adaptation of a comic book, its a movie based on a tv show, its theme song was the best thing about it, two of its sequels flat out sucked, it had blatant product placement, celebrity star power, it was better in animation then in film, it tried to do a remake as faithful as possible to the old films and it did a remake based on the successful trend of "darker and more realistic" and it tried to follow the success of its rivals.
So are they going to make a remake of this video?
We got to have money.
That's Hollywood in a nutshell
Just out of curiosity what is your opinion on the new Tom and Jerry remake AniMat?
When did things turn to chaos
I'm so mad they remade Total Recall. There's no improving on perfection
Hey Animat I hope you review the teaser trailer for Early Man, Despicable Me 3, and Coco on the animation podcast.
I don’t mind but I do think it shouldn’t stop original or new movies (which honestly there are so many movies based on books that haven’t been adapted yet that come out all the time)
I love the 2016 version of Ghostbusters, it has a great cast, funny jokes (in my opinion), and new characters... However I do admit there are a handful of mistakes (didn't stop me from buying the extended edition though😂)
I'm so sick of reboots!!
Honestly, I pray that the remake madness stops.
Remakes have always been around.
Where's the rock dog review?!
I honesty expected disney to do bettter than this
0:50 ...any San andreas cop
These remakes and reboots are more like cashgrabs than normal ones.
By now I have been conditioned to NEVER trust remakes and reboots.
Good thing we have Wes Anderson to give us original stuff.
Though Fantastic Mr. Fox was based on a children’s book by Roald Dahl. But Wes Anderson’s usual style and direction he added to the film adaptation actually makes it unique from other film adaptations of Roald Dahl books and makes it almost feel like an original animated film from the mind of Wes Anderson.
@@hunterolaughlin Oh of course, I was mostly referring to his other works like Isle of Dogs, which was also fantastic. But even he knows how to make good adaptations, and I would love to see him make another adaptation of something.
We don't talk about 2016 Ghostbusters
Nostalgia? I think you mean
*i n t e r t e x t u a l i t y*
Reboot boom: Reboom?
creative bankrupsy
Why not just stop buying tickets of these reboots? Send Hollywood the message that were not interested in reboots!!!
mtownboi4ya Not the ones from movies that are less than 10 years old! Please Hollywood, just remake/reboot oldie movies that nobody cares about anymore!
I want you to do animation look back to do cartoon network
honestly
I don't really mind reboots and remakes when it's done right like The Disney Remakes which I enjoy
If I can be honest, out of all the remakes/reboots I've seen....I'd say the 1990 Night of the Living Dead is the best. Basically shot-for-shot remake but it's actually decent imo.
Heavenlyhounds96 what about Batman Begins
Remakes and Reboots are a source of easy money because the ensure that people will go and see them. That is why the Studios make them to gather profit. And the profit is used for rather riskier projects which might also start a new franchise. So in the end, the Remakes keep the producers alive, to be able to make their job.
It’s because people are too lazy to think about something new, so they just find something from the past
notif squad
Hollywood's out of ideas.
so Hollywood is trying to be like J.K. Rowling?!? And her Harry Potter series
Ghost in the Shell isn't a reboot or remake. It's a adaptation.
The Arrow I agree :)
Of a anime movie, it can still kind of apply
+KidSnivy96 then same gose for power rangers, Harry Potter and even Lion King. ( adaptation of TV show, books, and a play)
No shit
You mean Re- adaption there?
I feel like reboot Jumanji can have a separate universe from the original and not based on the Jumanji universe.
2:29-2:37 Nostalgia Critic! Let's hope this isn't the closest you'll ever get to performing a review with Doug Walker, eh Matt.
The NC actually covered this his own editorial
There are good reboots like Godzilla
I will keep Michael Bay away from my films in production.
One Word: *MONEYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!*
Literally half of movie previews are remakes or an unnecessary billionth addition to a series
I am encouraging them to stop.
Who would pay for a Skullgirls movie
Speaking of remakes, AniMat, if you've ever watched Nostalgia Critic's "Old vs. New" video series, which remakes talked about in those videos do you think are the superior versions?
To help you remember, here's the list:
1. Batman (1989) vs. The Dark Knight
2. Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings vs. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring and The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
3. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory vs. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
4. The Nutty Professor (1963) vs. The Nutty Professor (1996)
5. King Kong (1933) vs. King Kong (2005)
6. The Ten Commandments (1957) vs. The Prince of Egypt
7. The Karate Kid (1984) vs. The Karate Kid (2010)
8. True Grit (1969) vs. True Grit (2010)
9. Manhunter vs. Red Dragon
10. Sam Raimi's Spider-Man Trilogy vs. The Amazing Spider-Man 1 & 2
11. Cinderella (1950) vs. Cinderella (2015)
12. The Evil Dead (1981) vs. Evil Dead (2013)
Nostalgia is GOOD.
However, disney, wokism, and remakes (for mere remakes) ARE NOT!
Remakes while infused with wokeness is WROSE!!
(What is 'IP Suicide'?
It is: IP Legacy + IP Nostalgia + Wokism = IP Suicide).
But..
Nostalgia??
"Nostalgia is GOOD" - statement, on its own.
Plus, Nostalgia is VERY GOOD ((IF)) done right.
But Nostalgia as ~Nostalgia~?? On its own? Is generally good!! :-)
Nostalgia is not something negative, it is something positive, wither exploited or not.
But, people don't understand, Nostalgia is something positive!! It is good!! Hence it gets exploited.
But, if done right? The IP SHINES!! ESPECIALLY WITH IT'S CORE FANBASE!!
Only a sinister, hateful, resentful, angry, narcissistic individual will WEPONISE an IP and its Nostalgia to push their personal agenda/ hate/ anger/ "revange".
Such individuals should be marked, removed and ostercised. People should avoid such destructful evil individuals.