God bless His Church. He understands our clergy are broken humans, but He looks at their hearts. May He have mercy on us all. The Solemnity of this installation is awe -inspiring. Wish the ArchBishop God's help. Thank God, I am Catholic
@@BrianBenson-rc9mu I agreed with you on the music, however this is a terrible take. NO is Catholic. It can be done beautifully. The problem is many liturgies are not done properly.
Don’t replace Richard Clarke, he is a good man and music director, Rather I am assuming the rector or director of liturgy wanted “inclusivity” and forced the music director to let them play that crap.
@@djbubsongs5812 There's a whole different group of people who worship at the cathedral that are Hispanic. It's not "forced inclusivity", it's "everyone who belongs to the parish should be involved with the welcoming of their new bishop".
What's wrong with Vatican II? FAQs 1. What is wrong with the Second Vatican Council? The Second Vatican Council taught doctrines which had been already condemned by the Church, and enacted disciplines which are contrary to the Church's teaching and constant practice. 2. What doctrines did it teach which were already condemned? There are four major errors concerning: (1) the unity of the Church; (2) ecumenism; (3) religious liberty; (4) collegiality. 3. What false doctrine does it teach concerning the unity of the Church? Vatican II teaches heresy concerning the unity of the Church, namely that the Church of Christ is not exclusively identified with the Catholic Church, but merely subsists in it. This heretical doctrine is contained principally in Lumen Gentium, and its heretical meaning is confirmed in statements of Paul VI and his successors, particularly in the 1983 Code of Canon Law, in the 1992 Statement concerning Church and Communion, and in the Ecumenical Directory. It is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Church, contained principally in Satis Cognitum of Pope Leo XIII, Mortalium Animos of Pope Pius XI, Mystici Corporis of Pope Pius XII, and in the condemnations of the "Branch Theory" made by the Holy Office under Pope Pius IX. 4. What false doctrine does it teach concerning ecumenism? The teaching of Vatican II concerning ecumenism, which states that non-Catholic religions are a "means of salvation," is overtly heretical. This doctrine directly contradicts the teaching of the Church that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, called by Pope Pius IX "a most well-known Catholic dogma." In addition, the ecumenical practices which have resulted from this heretical doctrine are directly contrary to Mortalium Animos of Pope Pius XI. 5. What false doctrine does it teach concerning religious liberty? The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty, contained in Dignitatis Humanae, nearly word for word asserts the very doctrine which was condemned by Pope Pius VII in Post Tam Diuturnas, by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos, by Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura, and by Pope Leo XIII in Libertas Praestantissimum. The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty also contradicts the royalty of Jesus Christ in society as expressed in Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI, and the constant attitude and practice of the Church with regard to civil society. 6. What false doctrine does it teach concerning collegiality? The teaching of Vatican II concerning collegiality alters the monarchical constitution of the Catholic Church, with which she was endowed by the Divine Savior. The doctrine of Vatican II, confirmed by the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which states that the subject (the possessor) of the supreme authority of the Church is the college of bishops together with the pope, is contrary to the defined doctrine of the Council of Florence and of Vatican I. 7. What is wrong with the disciplines which have emanated from Vatican II? The 1983 Code of Canon Law contains the heresy of Vatican II concerning the Church, mentioned above. It also permits sacrilege to the Blessed Sacrament, by approving of its reception by non-Catholics, which is a mortal sin, and permits communicatio in sacris (common public worship) with non-Catholics, which is a mortal sin. In addition, the Ecumenical Directory of 1993 permits ecumenical practices which have always been taught by the Church to be mortally sinful. 8. What does all this mean? It means that Vatican II and its subsequent reforms have given us a new religion, a religion which is substantially different from the Roman Catholic Faith founded by Christ. The reformers have substantially altered the three main components of religion: doctrine, worship, and discipline. The result is that the reformers are promoting a religion of ecumenism in place of the Roman Catholic religion, which has always taught that it alone is the one, true Faith, and that all other religions are false. The Vatican II religion teaches doctrines which have been condemned by the Church in the past. It has instituted rites and disciplines which are Protestant in nature. As a result, the religion which Catholics find in their local parishes and schools, although in name Catholic, is a new, non-Catholic religion already condemned by the Catholic Church. 9. Could it be that you are merely giving a bad interpretation to Vatican II? No. The heretical nature of this council is confirmed by: the doctrinal interpretation given to Vatican II by Paul VI and his successors in their decrees, encyclicals, catechisms, etc.; the series of abominations perpetrated by John Paul II against the First Commandment of God, in the form of ecumenical ceremonies which constitute false worship, even to pagan deities in some cases; the alteration of the Sacred Liturgy in such a way that the Catholic Mass has been replaced by a Protestant supper service; the tampering with the matter and form of the sacraments so that many of them, but most notably the Holy Eucharist and Holy Orders, labor under doubt or invalidity; the promulgation of disciplines, especially the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the Ecumenical Directory, which approve of sacrilege against the Holy Eucharist and the Sacrament of Matrimony, and which demonstrate heresies concerning the unity of the Church as their theoretical basis; the scandalous mockery made of the Sacrament of Matrimony by the granting of annulments for spurious reasons, constituting an abandonment of the sacred doctrine of the indissolubility of marriage; the fact that John Paul II is in communion with manifest heretics, has openly declared himself to be in communion with non-Catholic sects, and has recognized an apostolic mission in schismatic and Lutheran bishops, all of which destroys the unity of faith. He has even kissed the Koran, which explicitly denies the Incarnation and the Trinity. He has also publicly prayed that St. John the Baptist protect Islam.
It does not approve of the Blessed Sacrament to be received by non-Catholics. There may be some bad priests or bishops that allow this heresy, but the Magisterial teaching of the Church allows no such thing.
@ I’m glad you at least read this! Try reading a book from Fr. Anthony Cekeda called “the work of human hands”. The Vatican 2 is not good. Look at what is going on now with bergoglio and his teachings plus putting people like smootchy Fernandez (the art of kissing) in a position of power after all the scandel. These men are just fulfilling what the other Vatican 2 clergy started and will not stop till the destroy the church. Every clergy who still has the faith Vatican removes.
@@BrianBenson-rc9mu when did all of you get ordained ?? All of you arm chair cardinals keep disecting each and every mass that gets posted. Every archdiocese has liturgical guidelines that has to be followed consistent with the current papal policy. You people need to either keep your mouths shut or apply for ordination in the seinary.
@@cheech41 So the arch diocese in Boston has guidelines to allow pagans to participate in the new mass? Everything the Vatican 2 does is a mockery of the Catholic Church and is disgusting. Sad you can’t see it and defend these imposters.
God bless His Church. He understands our clergy are broken humans, but He looks at their hearts. May He have mercy on us all. The Solemnity of this installation is awe -inspiring. Wish the ArchBishop God's help. Thank God, I am Catholic
Nice to see all the keyboard cardinals joining us.
Best wishes and my God be with you.❤
God bless the new Archbishop and prayers to Cardinal Sean for a blessed retirement, fully deserved that ovation at the end
Boston is getting a great archbishop by way of Providence
There is a valid mass and priest just 40 min north of Boston that is pre Vatican 2
I think he is going to be great! Thank you Jesus!
What happened to the entrance hymn????
Entrance song😢
🙏🏻❤
Is this roman catholic or ? Im confused.
Yes Catholic
@@matthewschmidt5069
The novus ordo is not the Catholic Church.
@@BrianBenson-rc9mu Incorrect. You must be a Traditional Protestant
@@BrianBenson-rc9mu I agreed with you on the music, however this is a terrible take. NO is Catholic. It can be done beautifully. The problem is many liturgies are not done properly.
@@matthewschmidt5069
Nope just a Catholic but certainly reject all teaches and doctrines by the Vatican 2.
The gospel pop style entrance song is horrible.
Could you imagine going from make to music on the organ to that nonsense?
All of the novus ordo religion music is awful
@@BrianBenson-rc9mu hippy music
@@br0hamusit had the beautiful Gregorian Chant and Polyphony, then went into a campfire song.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Whoever picked the horrible music for this mass should be replaced.
Don’t replace Richard Clarke, he is a good man and music director, Rather I am assuming the rector or director of liturgy wanted “inclusivity” and forced the music director to let them play that crap.
@@djbubsongs5812 There's a whole different group of people who worship at the cathedral that are Hispanic. It's not "forced inclusivity", it's "everyone who belongs to the parish should be involved with the welcoming of their new bishop".
What's wrong with Vatican II? FAQs
1. What is wrong with the Second Vatican Council?
The Second Vatican Council taught doctrines which had been already condemned by the Church, and enacted disciplines which are contrary to the Church's teaching and constant practice.
2. What doctrines did it teach which were already condemned?
There are four major errors concerning: (1) the unity of the Church; (2) ecumenism; (3) religious liberty; (4) collegiality.
3. What false doctrine does it teach concerning the unity of the Church?
Vatican II teaches heresy concerning the unity of the Church, namely that the Church of Christ is not exclusively identified with the Catholic Church, but merely subsists in it. This heretical doctrine is contained principally in Lumen Gentium, and its heretical meaning is confirmed in statements of Paul VI and his successors, particularly in the 1983 Code of Canon Law, in the 1992 Statement concerning Church and Communion, and in the Ecumenical Directory.
It is contrary to the teaching of the Catholic Church, contained principally in Satis Cognitum of Pope Leo XIII, Mortalium Animos of Pope Pius XI, Mystici Corporis of Pope Pius XII, and in the condemnations of the "Branch Theory" made by the Holy Office under Pope Pius IX.
4. What false doctrine does it teach concerning ecumenism?
The teaching of Vatican II concerning ecumenism, which states that non-Catholic religions are a "means of salvation," is overtly heretical. This doctrine directly contradicts the teaching of the Church that there is no salvation outside the Catholic Church, called by Pope Pius IX "a most well-known Catholic dogma." In addition, the ecumenical practices which have resulted from this heretical doctrine are directly contrary to Mortalium Animos of Pope Pius XI.
5. What false doctrine does it teach concerning religious liberty?
The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty, contained in Dignitatis Humanae, nearly word for word asserts the very doctrine which was condemned by Pope Pius VII in Post Tam Diuturnas, by Pope Gregory XVI in Mirari Vos, by Pope Pius IX in Quanta Cura, and by Pope Leo XIII in Libertas Praestantissimum. The teaching of Vatican II on religious liberty also contradicts the royalty of Jesus Christ in society as expressed in Quas Primas of Pope Pius XI, and the constant attitude and practice of the Church with regard to civil society.
6. What false doctrine does it teach concerning collegiality?
The teaching of Vatican II concerning collegiality alters the monarchical constitution of the Catholic Church, with which she was endowed by the Divine Savior. The doctrine of Vatican II, confirmed by the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which states that the subject (the possessor) of the supreme authority of the Church is the college of bishops together with the pope, is contrary to the defined doctrine of the Council of Florence and of Vatican I.
7. What is wrong with the disciplines which have emanated from Vatican II?
The 1983 Code of Canon Law contains the heresy of Vatican II concerning the Church, mentioned above. It also permits sacrilege to the Blessed Sacrament, by approving of its reception by non-Catholics, which is a mortal sin, and permits communicatio in sacris (common public worship) with non-Catholics, which is a mortal sin. In addition, the Ecumenical Directory of 1993 permits ecumenical practices which have always been taught by the Church to be mortally sinful.
8. What does all this mean?
It means that Vatican II and its subsequent reforms have given us a new religion, a religion which is substantially different from the Roman Catholic Faith founded by Christ.
The reformers have substantially altered the three main components of religion: doctrine, worship, and discipline. The result is that the reformers are promoting a religion of ecumenism in place of the Roman Catholic religion, which has always taught that it alone is the one, true Faith, and that all other religions are false. The Vatican II religion teaches doctrines which have been condemned by the Church in the past. It has instituted rites and disciplines which are Protestant in nature.
As a result, the religion which Catholics find in their local parishes and schools, although in name Catholic, is a new, non-Catholic religion already condemned by the Catholic Church.
9. Could it be that you are merely giving a bad interpretation to Vatican II?
No. The heretical nature of this council is confirmed by:
the doctrinal interpretation given to Vatican II by Paul VI and his successors in their decrees, encyclicals, catechisms, etc.;
the series of abominations perpetrated by John Paul II against the First Commandment of God, in the form of ecumenical ceremonies which constitute false worship, even to pagan deities in some cases;
the alteration of the Sacred Liturgy in such a way that the Catholic Mass has been replaced by a Protestant supper service;
the tampering with the matter and form of the sacraments so that many of them, but most notably the Holy Eucharist and Holy Orders, labor under doubt or invalidity;
the promulgation of disciplines, especially the 1983 Code of Canon Law and the Ecumenical Directory, which approve of sacrilege against the Holy Eucharist and the Sacrament of Matrimony, and which demonstrate heresies concerning the unity of the Church as their theoretical basis;
the scandalous mockery made of the Sacrament of Matrimony by the granting of annulments for spurious reasons, constituting an abandonment of the sacred doctrine of the indissolubility of marriage;
the fact that John Paul II is in communion with manifest heretics, has openly declared himself to be in communion with non-Catholic sects, and has recognized an apostolic mission in schismatic and Lutheran bishops, all of which destroys the unity of faith. He has even kissed the Koran, which explicitly denies the Incarnation and the Trinity. He has also publicly prayed that St. John the Baptist protect Islam.
It does not approve of the Blessed Sacrament to be received by non-Catholics.
There may be some bad priests or bishops that allow this heresy, but the Magisterial teaching of the Church allows no such thing.
@
I’m glad you at least read this! Try reading a book from Fr. Anthony Cekeda called “the work of human hands”. The Vatican 2 is not good. Look at what is going on now with bergoglio and his teachings plus putting people like smootchy Fernandez (the art of kissing) in a position of power after all the scandel. These men are just fulfilling what the other Vatican 2 clergy started and will not stop till the destroy the church. Every clergy who still has the faith Vatican removes.
nothing
@@BrianBenson-rc9mu when did all of you get ordained ?? All of you arm chair cardinals keep disecting each and every mass that gets posted. Every archdiocese has liturgical guidelines that has to be followed consistent with the current papal policy. You people need to either keep your mouths shut or apply for ordination in the seinary.
@@cheech41
So the arch diocese in Boston has guidelines to allow pagans to participate in the new mass? Everything the Vatican 2 does is a mockery of the Catholic Church and is disgusting. Sad you can’t see it and defend these imposters.