It's called Geostationary Oscillation. Not all geo sats are directly above the equator, they can be slightly inclined whether by design or insertion failure. The satellite's gyros will compensate for the movement to keep the footprint centered. Sirius XM sats do a huge "figure 8" from North to South and back to ensure a uniform footprint for moving vehicles. A. Kemp - Lockheed Martin Astronautics
+Allen Kemp Oh my god are people really denying geostationary sats exists now?I hope I am being trolled hard. But nothing would surprise me these days.
@@my3dviews so you can see satellites with naked eye but there's no clear video of any of them from anyone owning expensive telescopes that could capture close up footage of them like in all nasa CGI's
Awesome video! From the list of satellites you give this seems to be the 19.2 degrees E orbital slot. I believe 1G, 1H and 2C have been retired or moved to other slots. Since these Satellites are co-located, they are not strictly stationary and each have a slight inclination and eccentricity that enables them to keep a safe distance from each other. As long as the satellites remain in their assigned "box" no re-pointing of the ground receiver is needed (the satellite dish) since the dish has a large enough beamwidth to cover the "box" In response to some of the comments below, the satellites in the video appear to be moving because -geostationary satellites are not strictly "stationary" since there are constant forces acting upon the satellite such as, moon's gravity, solar wind, non-uniform gravity of the earth etc. -the video appears to be shot at high magnification, which exaggerates the movements that would be seen to the naked eye
+nzoomed Because of inclination or orbital eccentricity. If you can trace their movement, they will make a figure 8. The closer to 0 degrees of inclination/eccentricity they have, the smaller the movement. This is why the large dishes (like the ones I work on) have AZ/EL motors, so they can track the path of these satellites.
You could take a flat earther up to outer atmo, let him pilot the craft, put him in a suit, space him for a walk and he would still insist that he was drugged and the whole thing is a sham. For certain types of people, it is more important to be "right" than "correct".
How can you compare seeing some lighted dots in the sky in a youtube video, to going in space yourself? get at least get some clear pictures of a satellite...
Nice footage! I've been meaning to locate a geostationary in my 10" Dob. Per "Turn Left at Orion" it's an interesting phenomenon...if you see a star that doesn't move across a stationary eyepiece view like the others, it's likely a geostationary satellite!
@@Tyrael66 Why are you saying that. He is correct in that they make one orbit of the Earth per day (the same as the Earth's rotation), so appear to be stationary.
Oh, yes! I totally forgot that we are looking at something that kinda "stays fixed" (at least against the star background). So within certain limits we have "all the time we need" with those satellites... I find it interesting that these satellites you photographed go up and down, so they are geosynchronous but not totally geostationary, right?
Because the light decreases its intensity, but it's never zero. In a night with clear sky, you can see satellite with zoom, or by naked eyes (only of they have any kind of lantern, I guess).
You can see them at night because they reflect the sun. During the day the sunlight "drowns" out the reflections. FFS I remember as a little kid watching Skylab en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylab go over night after night.
Such a good video but so many sick people commenting. From what country do these people come from? If you have questions after this Video watch the Astra Pomotional Video. It will answer everything.
Pictures of galaxies are taken by turning a huge telescope at the galaxy's direction, rotating the satellite accordingly with a proper software and the telescope needs to stay capturing the image during a long time, and the colors are aproximation. And galaxies are huge. Here, we have a guy with a camera filming with no softwares for allignment and trying to show someting that doesn't emit light, with miles of atmosphere between the guy and the satellite.
+Rodrigo Appendino Also, the bodies of the satellites are the size of a pickup truck. They orbit 22,300 miles above the equator. Throw in the fact that there are atmospheric distortions when viewing from earth...
So youre telling me it’s hard to see a satellite that is 16 thousand miles away from us? But we can se the rings on Saturn that is 846 MILLION miles away from us ? And it’s suppose to be around 8700 satellite’s orbiting the earth How come we then only see the space station iss so clear but nothing more ?
They don't because this video is fake and so is the information you are told about satellites. Here is the truth www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/ballon_prep.jpg
You're talking about a thousand sand grains in a stadium at least. The probability of anything colliding is infinitesimally small. Not to mention that space agencies track all the satellites and even the space junk.
yeah i can picture that, but most satellites/junk dont have any way of correcting their orbit, so being tracked wouldnt really help them to avoid a collision. if something was travelling towards the ISS in the oposite direction at the same speed as the ISS total impact speed would be nearly 60,000 kph, i just find it hard to see how they could even have such precise locations of these objects and such speed very limited time to adjust the ISS course to avoid it?
Vendetta Vegan There are small dust particles that occasionally hit the ISS which puts small dents in it, but generally not enough to damage it significantly. Again, any large space debris are so far apart that there's little to no chance of them ever colliding. As for tracking larger space debris and satellites I don't know the details but it does allow them to avoid collisions with larger debris. You can go to the Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science website by NASA to read up on it. Peace, fellow vegan.
Cheers for your reply, even with very tiny odds of a collision i think i would worry too much aboard the ISS to enjoy it, . [vegan fist bump] respect. :)
*....There isn't one Satellite phone, T.V. or Radio Company Which Can Send me a Link of a Geostationary or LEO Satellite in use.? Your Video is the Closest I've ever seen to a Real Satellite.. Why do you think this is...?*
If there was such a thing as a geostationary sattelite buy definition it would not move. If it did then someone with a dish reciever would lose the signal unless the dish moved constantly. Lies that are stupid are easy to detect.
+S&S Home Energy Research and Development what dish receiver? geostationary satellite are used for GPS and stuff. not communication. communication are handled with different satellite
+S&S Home Energy Research and Development Geostationary satellites are not completely stationary. They can be designed to be inserted a little above the eq. plane (for several reasons) or maybe some didn't end up precisely where they were supposed too. For this reason they appear oscilate a little as they orbit the Earth. The satellite does move to counter this oscillation. I don't know if this video is real or not, but you didn't detect anything.
@@jarreddeforge8094 Milky Way is a candy bar. 😎 Satellites are tethered to helium balloons in earth’s atmosphere. Earth is a spinning globe, and not FL___________________________AT and motionless. 👉🏽 🗣👂🏼 2 out of 3 of those statements are true.
Little hard to know those are satellites at that distance, be drones in the ionosphere also. Supposedly; It does not take much to see or image them, buses at 23,000 miles. And It's orbital characteristics tells it's distance. And ground triangulation says the distance. The brightness confirms the size. Seen a toaster sized at 250 miles, called Flock....?
You can see them with a telescope because they are bright compared to the black background. You can't see the actual size of the object. It is like seeing a lightbulb in the dark from several miles away. You can't actually see the size of the bulb, just the intense light as a pinpoint against the black background.
Not sure if I have looked close enough but I have not seen or read the word "proof" in the video or description. I guess Holodroid just wanted to photograph satellites, nothing more. If you Flatearthers don't believe in them it is your problem. Holodroid tell you how it's done, so I suggest you try it yourself. You do not even need a telescope. A good camera with a f/2.8 telelens and some image stocking software should do. But you should read the manual first, otherwise you will get underexposed blurry pictures and call the blurry schemes "Jesus"...
Ok so we all just take your word for it?Ummm,lol,ok.But this collection of blurry white dots is the over 20,000 satellites in space?This is the best we could muster up?I could duplicate this crappy video with paint.net and numerous ways to animate it..Dont even need photoshop.A lil over 17 billion dollars a year goes to nasa and this is all we got?
+X-ray Devil Same for me, I can't see any of these supposed thousands of satellites or even the ISS with my own telescope. Stars could just end up being "luminaries" and we just happen to live in a snowball inside an ocean. Modern science is the religion of the Beast ( tilt of the Earth is 90.0 - 23,4 = 66.6 degrees) and Earth moves at near 66600 miles per hour around the sun. I mean WTF is going there? Science can't explain the existence of any of the 4 elementals force of nature. You know they were building houses, bridges and even pyramid even before they "fabricated" the concept of Gravity. The belief system is the only real truth of this world. I believe God was manifested in the person of Jesus Christ and no "science" can disprove that. Time to wake up!
X-ray Devil, and maskemo1 -- Well, you guys are missing some fun! The ISS is easily visible with the naked eye; I've seen it countless times. Please visit www.heavens-above.com, and enter your location, and they'll generate a table indicating when it'll be visible at your location in the next 10 days. Occasionally there will be a "dry spell" when there won't be any passes at all, but be patient.
+Rick Brown The ISS is a hologram technology, not reality just like the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center. It is all fake like the recent "orange=33" Orlando gay shooting HOAX. This world is built on lies and deceptions. Indoctrinated and blinded by science can't see the LIGHT/TRUTH. Darkness is too heavy, dense and comfortable for them. BTW draw the locations of ISS path on the flat earth map, you'll observe an almost perfect circle. What a coincidence! LOL Your brainwashed fun ISS only serves a mind control agenda for domination over every nation of the world.
+maskemo1: _BTW draw the locations of ISS path on the flat earth map, you'll observe an almost perfect circle. What a coincidence! LOL_ walter.bislins.ch/work/index.asp?page=ISS+Tracks+on+Flat+Earth If you call this almost perfect circles than I can understand why you see the globe so flat! I think you need new glasses. LOL I admit this are "circle like" tracks. But what else should they be? Zig Zag lines? ISS orbits the globe earth on a great circle track as every satellite. On the globe model this IS ARE PERFECT CIRCLES. So the globe model must be right.
Fail , you would think with technology we would have more zoom in features on these telescopes, cause this looks like stars I can see this with my own 2 eyes with out a telescope.
+FreshWholeMilk Stars move, alright, I see them move every night. The whole universe is in perpetual motion according to the big brains like Stephen Hawking et al. Now, whom are you calling an idiot?
+kpn5000 I should have clarified that, they don't move about in the sky like the satellites shown here, they rotate across the sky, slowly, over the course of a night.
@Mudkip909 not if the sun is on the other side of the earth… But that only works on around model. Azimuthal equidistance is the only model that really makes sense.
@@astroroadshow Next time you see a jet at 5 miles, think of the size that you see. Then try to imagine that at 400+ miles away… You couldn’t see it buddy
@@hyecutie1 Yes you would if the aircraft was in orbit reflecting sunlight and you are in the dark down here. Don't forget this clip is using a telescope too.
Interesting. But shows nothing more than lights of some sort. Still waiting for a satellite telescope say hubble, to turn around and zoom in on all the boats planes and trains that are upside down and sideways.
@@Sharpless2 They’re called cell towers and antennas. 🤦🏻. GPS is a triangulation of 3 land based towers. Satellites are launched using helium balloons and are NOT in outer space. facebook.com/FlatEarthStationary/videos/1897215987203268/
NASA gives us amazing pics of planets{allegedly}, far away, and you can't give us a clear shot of a tinfoil box that's much closer? Zoom in on those lights, and let's see what they really are! Image stacking? So it's CGI after all! See ya!!!!!!
Indy Carr The reason why images of planets are so clear is because the cameras are of high quality compared to amateur telescopes. Also, probes are in Space and in an atmosphere therefore there are no particles blocking.
Now try this yourself using a telescope and you will not see any satellites or lights moving in such a manner. Remember the Satellite is meant to be fixed in position in order to obtain a locked signal for TV reception. (See Parabolic Receivers/Transmitters) So this is foolishness.
no moron you don't understand how it works. you don't understand orbits you don't understand anything. the satellite can stay in position because it rotates at the same time with the earth...learn about it and stop spreading shit if you know nothing about how it works
Now back up what you claim. Prove it by posting one authentic image or video footage of a satellite locked in Geostationary orbit. I can assure you that you cannot do this through a telescope linked to a recording or capture device. It is you who lacks understanding and you have the audacity to call people morons? According to these lying imbeciles satellites are locked and do not move and supposedly only move if they drift and are set to re-calibrate into position using thrust. What you can see in this video clearly are satellites moving, not locked in geostationary orbit.
NWOConspiracyGroup I don't need to prove through video even if I can. All I need is to tell you that satellite TV dishes and satellite phones like Thuraya disprove your flat shit. Becuase you are ignorant and unlettered. If you don't know why it disprove s your theory is because you understand nothing about how it works or what it involves.
Dragon Of Valachia - Actually again you are ignorant and that's why you rant and curse. Parabolic antennas have been in use BEFORE so-called Satellites existed. They are not and never were "Satellite Dishes". They are Parabolic antennas. Clearly you lack knowledge of this fact.
NWOConspiracyGroup I know what a parabolic antenna is you fucking moron I didn't want to confuse your tiny brain. Obviously you don't understand how it works then. Of course there were parabolic antennas before satellites however the shape and orientation of those was totally different becuase the early ones were not communicating with a fucking satellite you moron. Do some research on it before you talk more shit.
My uncle was a Satellite Fuel Technician for the Astra 1F satellite and its cool to see.
It's called Geostationary Oscillation. Not all geo sats are directly above the equator, they can be slightly inclined whether by design or insertion failure. The satellite's gyros will compensate for the movement to keep the footprint centered. Sirius XM sats do a huge "figure 8" from North to South and back to ensure a uniform footprint for moving vehicles. A. Kemp - Lockheed Martin Astronautics
+Allen Kemp Oh my god are people really denying geostationary sats exists now?I hope I am being trolled hard. But nothing would surprise me these days.
+Ming Lord Flat Earthers deny that all satellites exist.
@@my3dviews as if there would be full of clear videos of satellites seen from earth...
@@DreamingConcepts You can see satellites even with the naked eye if you look after sunset or before sunrise ISS is easy to spot.
@@my3dviews so you can see satellites with naked eye but there's no clear video of any of them from anyone owning expensive telescopes that could capture close up footage of them like in all nasa CGI's
Outstanding video! That was a lot of work, and so much appreciated.
Awesome video! From the list of satellites you give this seems to be the 19.2 degrees E orbital slot. I believe 1G, 1H and 2C have been retired or moved to other slots. Since these Satellites are co-located, they are not strictly stationary and each have a slight inclination and eccentricity that enables them to keep a safe distance from each other. As long as the satellites remain in their assigned "box" no re-pointing of the ground receiver is needed (the satellite dish) since the dish has a large enough beamwidth to cover the "box"
In response to some of the comments below, the satellites in the video appear to be moving because
-geostationary satellites are not strictly "stationary" since there are constant forces acting upon the satellite such as, moon's gravity, solar wind, non-uniform gravity of the earth etc.
-the video appears to be shot at high magnification, which exaggerates the movements that would be seen to the naked eye
why does it look like they are moving if they are geostationary, shouldnt they stay fixed from the point of view on the ground?
I presume their orbits have a little "tilt" that does that.
+nzoomed Because of inclination or orbital eccentricity. If you can trace their movement, they will make a figure 8. The closer to 0 degrees of inclination/eccentricity they have, the smaller the movement. This is why the large dishes (like the ones I work on) have AZ/EL motors, so they can track the path of these satellites.
You could take a flat earther up to outer atmo, let him pilot the craft, put him in a suit, space him for a walk and he would still insist that he was drugged and the whole thing is a sham.
For certain types of people, it is more important to be "right" than "correct".
jony face. Holy fuck you're an idiot. Think about that, long and hard you moron.
How can you compare seeing some lighted dots in the sky in a youtube video, to going in space yourself?
get at least get some clear pictures of a satellite...
Projection at its finest mate, well done. Now apply your view to yourself. You're being lied to. It's beyond embarrassing...
Any idea what the angular width of the Astra cluster is? Seems very narrow.
Nice footage! I've been meaning to locate a geostationary in my 10" Dob. Per "Turn Left at Orion" it's an interesting phenomenon...if you see a star that doesn't move across a stationary eyepiece view like the others, it's likely a geostationary satellite!
Great video! Observing geostationary satellites with my Dob is still on my bucket list ;)
Awesome video!
This is really cool CGI. Thanks for posting.
th-cam.com/video/JgY8zNZ35uw/w-d-xo.html
Why are they so close together? Is it different companies?
If moving, how the pickup TV channels remain fixed ???
geostationary...it rotates at the same speed as the earth.
@@DavidBeczuk no they don't. They move with 6500 mph dumbass.
@@Tyrael66 Why are you saying that. He is correct in that they make one orbit of the Earth per day (the same as the Earth's rotation), so appear to be stationary.
Fantastic!!
Very good. I will try this this summer in a clear night. How long was the exposure time for each image?
Oh, yes! I totally forgot that we are looking at something that kinda "stays fixed" (at least against the star background). So within certain limits we have "all the time we need" with those satellites... I find it interesting that these satellites you photographed go up and down, so they are geosynchronous but not totally geostationary, right?
How is it possible to see them at all with the size of them and the distance away from us? I think this video is fake.
Because the light decreases its intensity, but it's never zero.
In a night with clear sky, you can see satellite with zoom, or by naked eyes (only of they have any kind of lantern, I guess).
+rob b ok encyclopedia
You can see them at night because they reflect the sun. During the day the sunlight "drowns" out the reflections. FFS I remember as a little kid watching Skylab en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylab go over night after night.
Such a good video but so many sick people commenting. From what country do these people come from? If you have questions after this Video watch the Astra Pomotional Video. It will answer everything.
Great vídeo! Without a telescope I can make a similar? Just by a câmera in timelapse setup?
maybe by a very long longtime picture
Thats so impressive!
so earth telescope can see far away galaxys but cannot properly see satellites ? ... if they can plz link a video or image.
Satellites are tiny. Galaxies like Andromeda are visible with the naked eye. Learn the basics
Pictures of galaxies are taken by turning a huge telescope at the galaxy's direction, rotating the satellite accordingly with a proper software and the telescope needs to stay capturing the image during a long time, and the colors are aproximation. And galaxies are huge.
Here, we have a guy with a camera filming with no softwares for allignment and trying to show someting that doesn't emit light, with miles of atmosphere between the guy and the satellite.
+Rodrigo Appendino Also, the bodies of the satellites are the size of a pickup truck. They orbit 22,300 miles above the equator. Throw in the fact that there are atmospheric distortions when viewing from earth...
how convenient ...
+Sugoi !! Sugoi :D "how convenient ..."
That's what you say when you get decent answers to your question?
So youre telling me it’s hard to see a satellite that is 16 thousand miles away from us?
But we can se the rings on Saturn that is 846 MILLION miles away from us ?
And it’s suppose to be around 8700 satellite’s orbiting the earth
How come we then only see the space station iss so clear but nothing more ?
Why not?
Why do they move?
How long does the fuel last? Once it's out of fuel, what happens to the satellite?
They don't because this video is fake and so is the information you are told about satellites. Here is the truth www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/ballon_prep.jpg
About 15 years. Just before the fuel runs out, the satellite is given a push (by firing the on board rockets) to a "grave yard" orbit.
I don't know but I am feeling very proud
There is meant to be thousands of satellites travelling at thousands of kph.
Why is there never a collision with each other, ISS or with space junk?
You're talking about a thousand sand grains in a stadium at least. The probability of anything colliding is infinitesimally small. Not to mention that space agencies track all the satellites and even the space junk.
yeah i can picture that, but most satellites/junk dont have any way of correcting their orbit, so being tracked wouldnt really help them to avoid a collision. if something was travelling towards the ISS in the oposite direction at the same speed as the ISS total impact speed would be nearly 60,000 kph, i just find it hard to see how they could even have such precise locations of these objects and such speed very limited time to adjust the ISS course to avoid it?
Vendetta Vegan There are small dust particles that occasionally hit the ISS which puts small dents in it, but generally not enough to damage it significantly. Again, any large space debris are so far apart that there's little to no chance of them ever colliding. As for tracking larger space debris and satellites I don't know the details but it does allow them to avoid collisions with larger debris. You can go to the Astromaterials Research & Exploration Science website by NASA to read up on it.
Peace, fellow vegan.
Cheers for your reply, even with very tiny odds of a collision i think i would worry too much aboard the ISS to enjoy it, . [vegan fist bump] respect. :)
th-cam.com/video/JgY8zNZ35uw/w-d-xo.html
you can see hool of the moon with 4k resolution .. why this is WTF light ?/???
What's thr lifhtz
if they are geostationary then why are they moving
*....There isn't one Satellite phone, T.V. or Radio Company Which Can Send me a Link of a Geostationary or LEO Satellite in use.? Your Video is the Closest I've ever seen to a Real Satellite.. Why do you think this is...?*
Nice
? what / this dont show nothing but some shinny things moving about
those could be shit under water in the ocean
If there was such a thing as a geostationary sattelite buy definition it would not move. If it did then someone with a dish reciever would lose the signal unless the dish moved constantly. Lies that are stupid are easy to detect.
+S&S Home Energy Research and Development what dish receiver? geostationary satellite are used for GPS and stuff. not communication. communication are handled with different satellite
+S&S Home Energy Research and Development Geostationary satellites are not completely stationary. They can be designed to be inserted a little above the eq. plane (for several reasons) or maybe some didn't end up precisely where they were supposed too. For this reason they appear oscilate a little as they orbit the Earth. The satellite does move to counter this oscillation.
I don't know if this video is real or not, but you didn't detect anything.
th-cam.com/video/JgY8zNZ35uw/w-d-xo.html
there is no satellite in galaxy..
fauzan adrian Um yes satellites are orbiting the Earth and Earth is in the Milky Way wich is a Galaxy.
@@jarreddeforge8094
Milky Way is a candy bar. 😎
Satellites are tethered to helium balloons in earth’s atmosphere.
Earth is a spinning globe, and not
FL___________________________AT
and motionless.
👉🏽 🗣👂🏼 2 out of 3 of those statements are true.
oh come on, it's using timelapse camera
1:02 X / Y
Little hard to know those are satellites at that distance, be drones in the ionosphere also.
Supposedly; It does not take much to see or image them, buses at 23,000 miles.
And It's orbital characteristics tells it's distance.
And ground triangulation says the distance.
The brightness confirms the size.
Seen a toaster sized at 250 miles, called Flock....?
You can see them with a telescope because they are bright compared to the black background. You can't see the actual size of the object. It is like seeing a lightbulb in the dark from several miles away. You can't actually see the size of the bulb, just the intense light as a pinpoint against the black background.
look a like a star.. ahahahha
You can see satellites moving with the naked eye! Or I have eagle vision.
both ;)
what did you use, a toy telescope? :DDD
that was the worst proof of satellites. epic fail!
Not sure if I have looked close enough but I have not seen or read the word "proof" in the video or description. I guess Holodroid just wanted to photograph satellites, nothing more. If you Flatearthers don't believe in them it is your problem. Holodroid tell you how it's done, so I suggest you try it yourself. You do not even need a telescope. A good camera with a f/2.8 telelens and some image stocking software should do. But you should read the manual first, otherwise you will get underexposed blurry pictures and call the blurry schemes "Jesus"...
Pit Gutzmann the is that you can fotograph those drones because they are reAly close, not un the outer space, because it doesnt exist
no one said it was intended as proof, it's just fact
th-cam.com/video/JgY8zNZ35uw/w-d-xo.html
Ok so we all just take your word for it?Ummm,lol,ok.But this collection of blurry white dots is the over 20,000 satellites in space?This is the best we could muster up?I could duplicate this crappy video with paint.net and numerous ways to animate it..Dont even need photoshop.A lil over 17 billion dollars a year goes to nasa and this is all we got?
Anyone can look through a telescope and see satellites, why don't you buy one yourself?
+X-ray Devil Same for me, I can't see any of these supposed thousands of satellites or even the ISS with my own telescope. Stars could just end up being "luminaries" and we just happen to live in a snowball inside an ocean. Modern science is the religion of the Beast ( tilt of the Earth is 90.0 - 23,4 = 66.6 degrees) and Earth moves at near 66600 miles per hour around the sun. I mean WTF is going there? Science can't explain the existence of any of the 4 elementals force of nature. You know they were building houses, bridges and even pyramid even before they "fabricated" the concept of Gravity. The belief system is the only real truth of this world. I believe God was manifested in the person of Jesus Christ and no "science" can disprove that. Time to wake up!
X-ray Devil, and maskemo1 -- Well, you guys are missing some fun! The ISS is easily visible with the naked eye; I've seen it countless times. Please visit www.heavens-above.com, and enter your location, and they'll generate a table indicating when it'll be visible at your location in the next 10 days. Occasionally there will be a "dry spell" when there won't be any passes at all, but be patient.
+Rick Brown The ISS is a hologram technology, not reality just like the planes that crashed into the World Trade Center. It is all fake like the recent "orange=33" Orlando gay shooting HOAX.
This world is built on lies and deceptions. Indoctrinated and blinded by science can't see the LIGHT/TRUTH. Darkness is too heavy, dense and comfortable for them.
BTW draw the locations of ISS path on the flat earth map, you'll observe an almost perfect circle. What a coincidence! LOL
Your brainwashed fun ISS only serves a mind control agenda for domination over every nation of the world.
+maskemo1: _BTW draw the locations of ISS path on the flat earth map, you'll observe an almost perfect circle. What a coincidence! LOL_
walter.bislins.ch/work/index.asp?page=ISS+Tracks+on+Flat+Earth
If you call this almost perfect circles than I can understand why you see the globe so flat! I think you need new glasses. LOL
I admit this are "circle like" tracks. But what else should they be? Zig Zag lines? ISS orbits the globe earth on a great circle track as every satellite. On the globe model this IS ARE PERFECT CIRCLES. So the globe model must be right.
Fail , you would think with technology we would have more zoom in features on these telescopes, cause this looks like stars I can see this with my own 2 eyes with out a telescope.
Stars don't move, idiot.
+FreshWholeMilk Stars move, alright, I see them move every night. The whole universe is in perpetual motion according to the big brains like Stephen Hawking et al. Now, whom are you calling an idiot?
+kpn5000 I should have clarified that, they don't move about in the sky like the satellites shown here, they rotate across the sky, slowly, over the course of a night.
+FreshWholeMilk our sun is a star and and we move round the milkyway
Shiny weather balloons ANYONE?...
Why are all these supposed satellites the EXACT same size and brightness of the stars? Seems a bit too coincidental...
Someone kept making stars until they matched every possible brightness. That probably is a conspiracy of some kind
At that distance, a satellite or a faint star will take up 1 pixel. Not a coincidence.
@Mudkip909 not if the sun is on the other side of the earth… But that only works on around model. Azimuthal equidistance is the only model that really makes sense.
@@astroroadshow Next time you see a jet at 5 miles, think of the size that you see. Then try to imagine that at 400+ miles away… You couldn’t see it buddy
@@hyecutie1 Yes you would if the aircraft was in orbit reflecting sunlight and you are in the dark down here. Don't forget this clip is using a telescope too.
high altitude drones...there's no such thing as satellites.
+David Brainerd strangely for some reason i knew that this would be the first comment i saw. Lol
Sure dude, your delusions are a perfectly valid way of summing up the last 60 years of spaceflight and aerospace engineering. /s
Proofs?
Rodrigo Appendino Proofs of what? context please.
I'm asking proofs that there's no satellite.
Interesting. But shows nothing more than lights of some sort. Still waiting for a satellite telescope say hubble, to turn around and zoom in on all the boats planes and trains that are upside down and sideways.
flat earther?
@@delayedcreator4783 of course
@@builderpj so flat brain , no point in talking
SSShhhhhhh !!! Let people believe this is real :P
people don't believe it, they see and know ist
they should be called geo semi-stationary satellites
Lol this is hilarious 😂 - it is a satellite - can’t see shit
😂😂😂 Wtf
"Geostationary"
Neavo The Moon's gravity has an influence on those satellites therefore their orbits aren't perfect like everything else in the Universe.
You cannot be serious!!!!
N. Chambers Why?
@@jarreddeforge8094 Because being serious requires sporadic comments over many years.
wkwkwkw di suhu blast furnace astronotnya kaga kebakar
whats the point of having a telescope that doesn't magnify anything. Fail.
LOL... Nice Try..... SATELLITES ONLY EXIST IN YOUR IMAGINATION....
So does your intelligence
+The Lol Waffle rekt
+afzpuppet well how do you imagine to get phone signals/tv ? .... ........ fuking dont believe everything you read on the internet...
@@Sharpless2
They’re called cell towers and antennas. 🤦🏻. GPS is a triangulation of 3 land based towers. Satellites are launched using helium balloons and are NOT in outer space.
facebook.com/FlatEarthStationary/videos/1897215987203268/
@@awatchman5945 explain starlink then. you have no idea what youre talking about, flatearther.
Geostationary? But you see them moving? Orbital path? They are supposed to be locked in orbit, derp. keep dreaming
the first ones.... are not fckn satellites..
Flat earth
so flat like a ball
th-cam.com/video/JgY8zNZ35uw/w-d-xo.html
#bullshit
NASA gives us amazing pics of planets{allegedly}, far away, and you can't give us a clear shot of a tinfoil box that's much closer? Zoom in on those lights, and let's see what they really are!
Image stacking? So it's CGI after all! See ya!!!!!!
Indy Carr The reason why images of planets are so clear is because the cameras are of high quality compared to amateur telescopes. Also, probes are in Space and in an atmosphere therefore there are no particles blocking.
They’re clear because they are CGI.
Now try this yourself using a telescope and you will not see any satellites or lights moving in such a manner. Remember the Satellite is meant to be fixed in position in order to obtain a locked signal for TV reception. (See Parabolic Receivers/Transmitters) So this is foolishness.
no moron you don't understand how it works. you don't understand orbits you don't understand anything. the satellite can stay in position because it rotates at the same time with the earth...learn about it and stop spreading shit if you know nothing about how it works
Now back up what you claim. Prove it by posting one authentic image or video footage of a satellite locked in Geostationary orbit. I can assure you that you cannot do this through a telescope linked to a recording or capture device. It is you who lacks understanding and you have the audacity to call people morons? According to these lying imbeciles satellites are locked and do not move and supposedly only move if they drift and are set to re-calibrate into position using thrust. What you can see in this video clearly are satellites moving, not locked in geostationary orbit.
NWOConspiracyGroup I don't need to prove through video even if I can. All I need is to tell you that satellite TV dishes and satellite phones like Thuraya disprove your flat shit. Becuase you are ignorant and unlettered. If you don't know why it disprove s your theory is because you understand nothing about how it works or what it involves.
Dragon Of Valachia - Actually again you are ignorant and that's why you rant and curse. Parabolic antennas have been in use BEFORE so-called Satellites existed. They are not and never were "Satellite Dishes". They are Parabolic antennas. Clearly you lack knowledge of this fact.
NWOConspiracyGroup I know what a parabolic antenna is you fucking moron I didn't want to confuse your tiny brain. Obviously you don't understand how it works then. Of course there were parabolic antennas before satellites however the shape and orientation of those was totally different becuase the early ones were not communicating with a fucking satellite you moron.
Do some research on it before you talk more shit.
Satellites my arse, more like BULL SHIT flying.
@Mudkip909
How 🤚🏽
fake
@Mudkip909
How 🤚🏽