Roe v. Wade | Homework Help from the Bill of Rights Institute

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
  • Do women have a right to privacy when deciding whether to have an abortion? In 1969, a woman under the alias “Jane Roe” challenged a Texas law that outlawed abortions. The case eventually reached the Supreme Court, where Roe argued that the Constitution protects a woman’s right to privacy in having an abortion. In a 7-2 decision, the Court ruled the right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy protected by the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
    Like other Supreme Court cases related to the Due Process Clause, incorporation played a part in the Roe v. Wade ruling. Incorporation suggests that states must adhere to the protections granted in the Bill of Rights.
    To this day, the ruling in Roe v. Wade remains one of the most controversial Supreme Court decisions.
    Supreme Court Document Based Questions: billofrightsin...
    Roe v. Wade Viewing Guide: billofrightsin...
    Roe v. Wade and the Modern Abortion Debate: billofrightsin...
    Roe v. Wade Lesson: billofrightsin...
    Landmark Supreme Court Cases: billofrightsin...
    About Bill of Rights Institute
    Established in September 1999, the Bill of Rights Institute is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization that works to engage, educate, and empower individuals with a passion for the freedom and opportunity that exist in a free society. The Institute develops educational resources and programs for a network of more than 50,000 educators and 70,000 students nationwide.
    Official Site: billofrightsins...
    Facebook: / billofrightsinstitute
    Twitter: / brinstitute
    Instagram: / brinstitute
    BRI Educator Newsletter Sign Up Page: billofrightsin...
    #roevwade #abortion #incorporation #14thamendment #constitution #dueprocess #rightoprivacy

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @santosh911
    @santosh911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    Sorry guys, this was a really shallow history without all the actual controversy that accompanied the case.

  • @delaneyboston6806
    @delaneyboston6806 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I love how Roe's two attorneys are women,, what an awesome power move

    • @boringbilal
      @boringbilal 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      it doesnt matter what the attorneys are.

  • @briangormley1972
    @briangormley1972 5 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I am a firmly planted in the prolife camp and was skeptical when I saw advertisement for this video. But I will commend its production as fair, balanced, and informative view of the Roe v. Wade decision. Thanks.

  • @AceHardy
    @AceHardy 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    🙏🏻✍️

  • @thomaslefort-duviolier5611
    @thomaslefort-duviolier5611 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    rili goude vidéo
    i likedit a lotte

  • @cynthiakramer4452
    @cynthiakramer4452 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

    This video appears to be objective on the issue of abortion rights but after watching it twice, it is clearly questioning the decision in Roe v. Wade. There are more photographs displaying anti-abortion signs and less affirming of the positive significance of this constitutional right of every woman. What are the goals of the producers of this film? It certainly does not to appear to be to uphold the 1972 Roe v. Wade decision.

  • @mandy4762
    @mandy4762 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Facts

  • @bromineandtungsten
    @bromineandtungsten 4 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Abortion is this generation’s slavery-only worse. I pray our country looks back on this with deep shame.

    • @millabasset1710
      @millabasset1710 4 ปีที่แล้ว +68

      Go take your religious babble out of this. A fetus is no more sentient than a rock outside, that's something science already confirmed decades ago.

    • @Ha-Youll-Never-Guess-Who-I-Am
      @Ha-Youll-Never-Guess-Who-I-Am 3 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      @M Novalic Yeah but just because some handicapped people might lack total self-awareness or require a dependent lifestyle doesn't give us the right to take their life. If we stop recognizing that a living human, no matter where they are in development, may lack the inherent rights and dignity under our law, where do we draw the line? I'm not totally anti-abortion, but I can see why the pro-life side believes what they do