I think the tragic thing in these tests (both helmets and plates) is that nobody ever does 'glancing blows'. AKA not direct/perpendicular shots. even 15-20 deg I'd imagine yields a lot more chance for survival
Problem with this test is that with each shot the helmet takes it weakens it more and more. If you want a proper test, you need to shoot a new helmet each time you go up in caliber.
5 years ago, I served a mandatory one-year service in the Russian Army. I had a РАТНИК set (helmet + armor). In general, a very good thing if you take into account the previous versions of armor and helmets. Also included in the helmet of a serviceman is a set of fasteners for the PNV, a tactical flashlight and a radio beacon. I myself did not participate in the fighting, so I can't say how they are showing this kit now in eastern Europe
@@Filoret Ну если в географии ты не шаришь, то скажу тебе вот что, что Европу и Азию как географические определения разделяют Уральские горы, следовательно - я сказал правильно.
@@epapa737 This is why everyone who goes to a range should bring a IFAK too. The amount of people that go to ranges and don't even have a tourniquet is too high. Having a chest seal wouldn't be a bad idea either.
Asking from wrong people. Black market has anything and everything you want, in anywhere you want and some cases for ridiculously cheap price. There isint a country in this planet where there is no black market. Anyone claiming otherwise is ether ignorant or lying.
Спасибо. Интересный тест🔥👍. Этот шлем пережил гораздо больше "издевательств", чем должен был. По нашей классификации это класс бр1. Основное его назначение, защита от осколков 1,05гр на скорости 630 м/с, при диаметре 6,3мм.
Так ИРЛ очень мало шлемов выше первого класса, ведь задача шлема это остановка вторичных поражающих элементоа на определённой дисстанции, это максимум что шлема должны остонавливать, возможно ещё и пистолетные выстрелы на дисстанции в пару десятков метров
@@ИванМаточкин-и5ы Тут главное для чего шлем ... Этот шлем очень легкий как они сказали ... И видимо основной упор защита от осколков и при этом что бы можно было носить очень долго многие часы ....дни
@@АлександраА-з5м так и есть. когда носишь шлем часами и днями - это утомляет, каким бы крутым и сильным ты не был. Поэтому масса шлема - это ОЧЕНЬ важно.
Charlie’s mannerisms are comedic genius. It’s like a politician forcing his 9 year old son who’s awkward, tired, and perpetually hungry to public speaking engagements to show that he’s a family man
It'd be cool to see a helmet shot by common rifle calibers at different 100-yard increments to see how far it takes to stop. We often see stories of an ach stopping a rifle round over seas, but I never see any mention of the estimated distance it was shot from.
@@paulbarclay4114 Yeah you could theoretically catch a round from far away or a very oblique angle so that the helmet makes a difference between living and dying but it's such an outside chance you probably shouldn't be factoring it in.
@Paul Barclay there was a marine that took one in Afghanistan directly from probably 5-700m away, he survived and was able to walk away from that. There was also a soldier who took one in the middle of the bsck of his head, and survived and continued serving. I'm not saying this is normal, I'm just saying it has happened before.
Fun fact, a 17HMR shoots a pill the same weight at same velocity as the shrapnel standard used for the PASGT / ACH. Might be worth looking into for all these ballistic tests.
Unfortunately the 17HMR uses a pointed bullet and so would not really be appropriate for "in lieu " substitution. Unless you could get it to wildly keyhole from the moment it left the barrel. Similar speeds but different shapes. Non aerodynamic shapes will cause greater injury but may be as little as fifty feet. The 17HMR is quite potent beyond a significant amout more. I like your way of thinking though, keep it up!
Considering that this helmet is lighter and cheaper than the American one, this is a very good helmet. in addition, the design of this helmet involves changing the trajectory of the shrapnel
lol no, it’s total shit, not enough propaganda will ever stand up the russian army again. What I love is that this helmet was bought because corrupt politicians and officers sold it on eBay. In the meantime ruskie solders get airsoft helmets and helmets with aluminum plates.
I don't think it's that great of a helmet, it would have to be 1/5 the price for it to be worth using for your infantry considering that something like 9mm has enough power to deform it to lethal levels
You can make a helmet that will withstand a direct shot from .50 bmg, but then your neck will break under its weight. This helmet demonstrates the golden mean. Excellent protection against various kinds of fragments, while your spine is still not injured when wearing. Also note how deep the helmet covers both the back of the head and the temples
I'd rather have an injured spine than be dead. There are plenty of helmets that stop 7.62x54/51 non AP rounds and allow the wearer to live with a TBI. This helmet is outdated by US standards but still better than nothing.
@@moonasha standards??? Bro we dropped the good helmets and when with the ops core. It's not even rated for 9mm. The old ECH was a better helmet than the lightweight garbage that is the opscore. PERIOD.
@@moonasha You don't get it, it would literally tear your spine apart, you'd be just as dead. At that point it's entirely about the energy of the projectile, no penetration needed
When I did my military service as a Vehicle crewman I remember when they refitted the Infantry with the Ratnik gear. It was popular because of how light it was. In the Russian military, there was always the long-standing sentiment that helmets were for cowards, thus many men used to ditch their heavy helmets and just wear a military cap/ushanka instead. The lightness of the 6b47 made helped change this sentiment.
@@Lo-tf6qt yeah it's quite weird for when the helmet was designed and made. It's not uncomfortable to wear but it definitely takes more time to strap on
If you're planning to fight people with 855a1 and Sig Spears, I feel like having an ultralight helmet that still protects against shrapnel is probably better than a heavy helmet that stops non-AP rifles which your enemies aren't using
@@soriddosuneko I mean, not really the same thing at all. The MCX Spear fires full size rifle rounds while the MCX fires intermediate rounds. The spear specifically fires the ridiculously zippy 6.8x51.
This Russian helmet has basically the same level of protection as the older ACH that I was issued. The vast majority of synthetic fiber helmets in the world are basically IIIA. The ECH can stop some rifle rounds because it is made of UHMWPE, a type of polyethylene. It should be able to float as well. I had UHMWPE plates years ago that would float. The downside of UHMWPE plates is they cannot stop steel core/tipped ammunition. That's why ceramic plates are still the most common.
ECH and IHPS helmets do stop rifle rounds but they are severely deficient in regards to backface deformation vs the ACH. Source material: Oxide doing tests on the IHPS and any other ECH test out there.
Referencing the movie "Master and Commander" was a win all by itself. That movie is so underrated IMO. Also, Charlie at the end just about put me on the floor I was laughing so hard.
Camo 6b47 is honestly my preferred helmet behind the Wendy or Ulach since it chops up the outline of the normal 6b47 and is also camouflaged- perfect for early or mid wipe
The guys at the front say it's a really good helmet as far as it's ballistic properties go. It's main drawbacks are its outdated retention system/chin strap combination and the fact that it lacks of PGD rails to mount headphones (the Ratnik system uses headphones that are worn under the helmet). The prior can be solved pretty easily with cushion pad and a Team Wendy-esque retention system conversion kit, the latter is a bit of a challenge, so most troops opt to buy earless/semi earless helmets instead.
@@gleisbauer25 reminds me of WW2 when they would get planes back and they would reinforce the areas that were shot most. Except these planes were coming back, so they started reinforcing the other areas and had fewer losses
The question is: "Does this helmet protect the head?" "Yes, we were able to identify him because his head was well protected. The sheet-metal in his plate carrier was, however, visibly shredded and covered in a red sticky substance."
I have seen a Russian soldier what was shot through the helmet and he had a big cut in is head of a few cm, about two inches but survived, just like in ur test at 9:40. He was so lucky..but i think not a normal single helmet will stop an AK round or AR round. Depends on the angle how the bullet hits.. with a direct hit it goes trrough all normal military helmets. I have seen lot of Ukrainians what were shot through the head and helmet and that were western donated helmets.
Ukrainians are given Older helmets Russians are Given Older helmets Both teams have bad tactics and vehicles. But, when you have the biggest economy in the world supporting you, nothing id imposible
What a lie! Western helmets stop a direct hit by a T-34 tank projectile (after all, the Russian army has no others left). The Russian army fights exclusively on T-34 and airsoft equipment
Try the helmet of the Russian company ATLAS. In their community, they posted a photo of a helmet that stopped a 5.45x39 bullet. I would like to see how good it really is.
Technical note: spalling come off the back of the armor plate when it fractures upon an impact. Fragmentation is what is reflected off the front of the armor.
6б47, а остальные тяжелые, вот у товарища на сво старая американская каска времен войны в заливе, легкая и прочная, никакого алюминия и стали, каска полностью КЕВЛАРОВАЯ, сложно такую нам сделать? или так и будем своим же палки в колеса вставлять? Уточню, американской каске под 20 лет, обзоры на нее есть, держит всё, что надо, от остального спасет только стальной позвоночник в шейном отделе, начало нулевых, Карл
@@G.R.O.N.D. вообще у нас делают вполне себе реплики pasgt/ ach, тоже из арамидного волокна (колпак 100 например). просто они тяжелее при таком же уровне защиты по сути, чем 6б47. такие дела.
@@tcsailair7750 everything on aliexpress will be fake. The only way to get a real 6b47 is buying it from someone. No website to my knowledge sells ballistic 6b47's
Это военный шлем. На войне ребята воюют с автоматами серии Калашников (или AR), снайперскими винтовками и крупнокалиберными пулемётами. Никакой шлем не остановит пулю Калаша (или AR) с реальных дистанций боя - до 100-150 метров. Шлем предназначен для защиты головы от осколков, падений и тому подобного... и в последнем случае от пули, которая прилетела по касательной или на излёте. А ещё на шлем удобно навешивать дополнительное оборудование.
Плюс ко всему энергию пули должна ещё уметь компенсировать и шея носителя шлема иначе будет травма позвонков. Шлем, который выдержит АК(AR) сделать не сложно, сложно будет его носить так чтобы не сломало шею при попадании, импульс же никуда не делся.
Literally busted out laughing at "Charlie get some attitude!". It's the little gags and things (that most people edit out) that make this show- 'cause you know if you were there, you'd be clowning with your buddies too.
I saw a video from Ukraine where a ukranian soldier got almost exactly this shot at 9:34 The bullet went right through the top of his helmet leaving him with a bleeding wound on his head but alive. Lucky dude.
One thing I've wanted to see from you guys is how well common hunting rifle rounds would do against common plates and helmets. Maybe go all out and see how different loads do as well.
they would probably do bad against plates since vast majority of hunting rounds are designed to deform on impact not penetrate armour, aka most of them are soft points or some variations of hollow points, useless against armour.
@@thesayxx Well, my reasoning was mostly thinking about FMJ or other harder-nosed bullets. I just want to see what rounds like 6.5 Creedmoor and 7mm Rem Mag would do personally. I know what 7mm Mag does against deer, I feel like it would be fun to see if anything.
@@thesayxx idk, depends on the armor material. Spalling is not your friend. Also, many common hunting rounds have a lot more velocity and mass behind them than 5.56mm.
@@Dragunov1Bros Anything a standard 5.56 shoots through, will do even worse against almost all FMJ hunting cartridges. Most vest plates and helmets used by the Russians will not stand up to a high BC, high SD FMJ 7mm Rem Mag out to at least 400-500 yards. Of course they have some vest plates that do, but the majority of their soldiers don't have those.
Every time I see tests like this, I think of that scene in “saving private Ryan” when they storm the beach at Normandy and that one soldier has a bullet deflect his helmet, so he TAKES OFF HIS FRIGGIN HELMET to observe the miracle and another bullet comes along and goes through his head.
I would say let's check to see on the current issue for the Ukrainian Army draftees, but they ran out about 8 months ago. Now if they get anything, it's either something they bought themselves, or whatever some other nation donated. Been seeing PASGT's, that weird British thing, hell, even some old M1 steel helmets, but for the most part they don't have helmets anymore.
I know he has been in videos for a while but Charlie is a great addition to the team. Keep up the great work guys. Also if you haven't seen the last video yet check it out has one of the funniest lines I've heard in a while.
Can understand the way they are thinking when it comes to this helmet, probably cheaper and easier to make(can equip more soldiers with it), stops small artillery/grenade fragments which most likely causing most of the damage in the current war. Both side use hand grenades extensively due to the trench warfare and drone warfare.
I doubt it is very cheap to make, considering the kevlar used in it. All metal helmets are most likely much cheaper, faster and easier to make for the Russians, but they quickly get heavy if you want decent protection. The main advantage this helmet has, is the weight. If you are in a situation where you need to wear a helmet for hours, day after day, and the chances for heavy artillery hitting you is rather small, then this helmet is perfect.
@@yastyman I am sure they can make an all metal helmet without kit and sell if with a good profit for $50. The Chinese can most likely do it for 20$ with a good profit.
A much better design to safe guard (hopefully) against a deformation kill is to have a thinner secondary skull wrap that is fitted on the head straps on the inside of the helmet (between the head and inside of the helmet. This could possibly prevent the sharpest deformations from hitting the skull directly.
He just pops out from behind a rock.. Best intro ever. Then hot shot Charles comes flying in decked out in the safest looking outfit on this pile of dirt ..🤣 Cudos to whoever put this together there is a genius amongst us.
Tactical and technical characteristics The helmet 6B47 provides protection from: 9 mm bullets of 57-N-181S cartridges of the PM pistol from a distance of 5 meters; imitators of fragments (a steel ball with a diameter of 6.3 mm and a mass of 1.05 g) at a speed of no more than 630 m/ s. He even exceeded his task. You can also shoot from an RPG-7, of course)
@@alexb7641 yup. But not too difficult to make your own. Buy commercial poly tip bullets. Use a jeweller’s lathe to shape your own penetrator from steel bar, and then replace the tops before loading. You might need a drop of loktite to hold the tip in place. Easy-peasy.
@@andrewallason4530 I know you used to be able to buy them for something ridiculous like $10/rd. FN has a stranglehold on those though. Be interesting to see an m855 loaded into one also.
@@alexb7641 yup. Not a problem here in Australia. Pretty much absolutely a no go for civvies to own. Some guys I know would love to get i to 5.7 for vermin control ( me included) but we are generally sticking with .223 or .308 on bigger stuff, and various .22s or .17s on the smaller ones.
the reason they dont use padding is because of RU Mod requirements. when the strapping is properly adjustet the helmet wount touch the head when shot within is protection class ( for example 9x18 ) in theory , you wont have any form of concussion when inside of protection calss while with padding even when surivable some bit of force will transfer to the head ( infact installing padding inside the 6b47 will be more harmfull ). i hope my english was good enough to understand. also dont forget that the helmet is comparatively very light wich was also a requirment. Russian forces right now have basicly a blanko check. I see Mobilized infantryment equiped with Classcom TOR , mobilised marksmen getting lobaev arms TSVL 8 M4 rifles etc..... So there is that
@@c1n1kdtm50 sadly , probably most in the west dont know they exist. the most interesting rifle to look at from them right now would be LAR-10. its a very new rifle, in fsct so new its not listed in their website. i think a charchge of 100 rifles was sent to marksmen of the special military operation. whats so special about it ? its a direct opponent of the new SvCh rifle ( replscement for the SVD ) , its based o the AR10 design like thr name implies , chambered in 308, opposed to 54R , and is ALOT more accurate ( not worse then 0,5 MOA ). there is even one recorded use of that rifle on a human target at 800 meters away where the shooter fires 2 quick shots , bouth shots impact target nearly on the same spot and the rifle scope basicly hasnt moved at all wich was quite impressive.
I think a long time ago Paul Harrell did 5.56 vs 7.62x39, I can't recall if it was a wall of telephone poles or railroad ties that he shot through as one of the barrier demos.
The problem is that the Russian defence industrial base is famously corrupt. Production batches for these items have extremely poor qc and are highly variable in performance. Helmet deliveries to the Russian Army have included steel pots with the 6B47 helmet cover and suspension system, units coated with substandard resin, etc.
@@armorynorth The problem is, there is NO ACTUAL PROOF of it being corrupt. Anectdotal hearsays and stories are no proof at all. Before anybody disses me, make your own, unbiased research. Much of what we know about Russia is complete bollocks. Much of what we think we know about our own native countries is even more bollocks.
Thank you so much for this video. Most of the battles are at distances of 100 to 150 to 200 meters. In urban battles it can be barely 50-90 meters and the elevations of high-rise buildings. The main striking factor goes to the body and limbs. The head is rarely hit, unless of course you are a target for a sniper. And finally, artillery and drones don't care what protection class you are wearing.
Basically, the protection of the bulletproof vest and helmet has a stopping action against shrapnel. It's like armor on a tank, only another tank is able to penetrate if there are no additional protective components that increase the thickness, such as the slope of the armor, active and inactive systems, and so on.
There's a lot of real combat examples in Ukraine right now showing these 6B47 Ratnik helmets stopping 5.45 and even 5.56 sometimes. 7.62 usually goes right through it everytime. Theres speculation of 5.45 maybe hitting or going through something before hitting the helmet and that's why it doesn't go through the Ratnik helmet. Believe it or not theres been a couple of Ukraine soldiers that had a 5.45x39 get stopped by a cell phone in his jacket. Which is very surprising since most 5.45 rounds Russia is using is the "PS" steel core ammo. There was another example of a Ukrainian solider actually taking a 30mm BTR round to his plate carrier and the plate carrier actually stopped it somehow... many people think that the 30mm round ricochet off of something before hitting his plate carrier and that's why it didnt just blow him and his plate carrier away. Solider got extremely lucky.
The tip of the standard 5.45 round is hollow. Not a hollow-point but hollow inside the tip of the bullet. This is to cause deformation upon impact and having the rest of the bullet to tumble.
@@s2k240 ну что то в тесте в этом не было никаких особо травм. Да и не для этого эти каски делаются. Основная задача это противоосколочная защита. А что бы пули головой ловить есть другие шлемы.
@@ДенисМалышев-э9ъ ага от пистолетного выстрела вогнулся шлем вовнутрь ты понимаешь что сам шлем пробьёт человеку черепушку, особенно в районе виска где толщина кости 2мм в прямом смысле
@@ДенисМалышев-э9ъ никакой шлем не ловит полноценные пули, таких не существует, шлем и правда придуман от осколков и рикошетов, но 3 класс должен останавливать пистолетный патрон
@@s2k240какого именно пистолета? Пистолеты разные и патроны тоже. Покажи мне третий класс, который удержит к примеру 7Н31) А по факту, даже в видео из пистолета не пробили шлем. Вмятина скажешь? Так шлем не на прямую на голову надет. К тому же подшлемник предусмотрен. И опять же повторю, пробития нет, значит шлем соответствует своей номенклатуре.
Maybe the real helmets are the friends we made along the way.
Yeah
Depending to the angle that the bullet enters your friend's boddy. It may stop it indeed
Kinda has some dark humor in there
Perhaps the best armor are the friends we made along the way
Sir, you own me a drink because I just spat out mine hahaha
That's fucking gold given the kit mobiki got lol
I think the tragic thing in these tests (both helmets and plates) is that nobody ever does 'glancing blows'. AKA not direct/perpendicular shots. even 15-20 deg I'd imagine yields a lot more chance for survival
100%, we can start incorporating these
@@GarandThumb so much science! 😃
@@GarandThumb and start incorporating 200-300 yard shots from 7.62 5.56 and 308. Thanks
@@GarandThumb Badass Mike. TY for the response; very much appreciated.
Keep up the good work and remember to find time for fam :)
Direct impact is worst case scenario, which I would say is more valuable. However, there is definitely good merit to indirect impacts.
Problem with this test is that with each shot the helmet takes it weakens it more and more. If you want a proper test, you need to shoot a new helmet each time you go up in caliber.
That’s unfortunately too expensive.
@@yaboyed5779that means conclusion is also dogwater
@@HMG2119 true.
In a war you can't change helmets everytime you get hit but for ballistic testing yes it's not good
@@Oleksey1769 not sure what point you are trying to make. In a war you would also not get hit with multiple calibers gradually increasing
5 years ago, I served a mandatory one-year service in the Russian Army. I had a РАТНИК set (helmet + armor). In general, a very good thing if you take into account the previous versions of armor and helmets. Also included in the helmet of a serviceman is a set of fasteners for the PNV, a tactical flashlight and a radio beacon. I myself did not participate in the fighting, so I can't say how they are showing this kit now in eastern Europe
Ну ты падла и хвастун. Ещё и по аглицки пиздишь. Ну смотри. Скоро уже. Кеды не забудь . Бежать.
Ты хотел сказать в западной России?)
@@Filoret где мы сейчас воюем в западной Европе?
@@Filoret Ну если в географии ты не шаришь, то скажу тебе вот что, что Европу и Азию как географические определения разделяют Уральские горы, следовательно - я сказал правильно.
@@pikogatarifan7650 он с запасом на будущее имеет ввиду, ты не понял
9:09 good thing you had your helmet on Mike. That brass could have severely injured you. Range safety is no joke.
exactly
I was chuckled at until I was walking on a cold range and heard a gun shot... Everyone respected the helmet thereafter
Ha-hum...cough....cough...Alec Baldwin
@@epapa737 This is why everyone who goes to a range should bring a IFAK too. The amount of people that go to ranges and don't even have a tourniquet is too high. Having a chest seal wouldn't be a bad idea either.
That was a very acrobatic casing.
I'd say the minimum requirement for a combat helmet is that it can defend from shrapnel and flying debris.
and bump protection
WW2 called: They want their safety standards back
Might as well wear just a balaclava at that point.
@@thomasrussell7135 you want a combat helmet or a helmet made for riding a bike?
@@bruh5361 Too expensive and heavy?
Given the fact that most casualties in this war are caused by artillery and not rifle headshots, knowing this helmet stops all shrapnel is pretty good
Так и есть, лучше бы в лабораториях на большой скорости запускали осколок из пусковой и смотрели с ЗКТ.
It doesn't stop anything if you don't get issued with it, but instead are fobbed off with a stamped aluminium airsoft helmet.
Не забудь пакет, лаптеногий😂😂
Well... it stopped small fragments from a bullet, but it probably wouldn't stop larger, heavier shrapnel from an artillery round.
@@matthewbrown7659 it stopped pistol calibers and even the. 44 magnum so it absolutely will stop artillery shrapnel
I'd say that garand thumb actually tends to be the most unbiased and neutral gun channel on YT
Forgotten weapons would like a word
"Unfortunately grenades are hard to get ...for whatever reason."
I love this dude.
Asking from wrong people. Black market has anything and everything you want, in anywhere you want and some cases for ridiculously cheap price. There isint a country in this planet where there is no black market. Anyone claiming otherwise is ether ignorant or lying.
They’re easier to make….so I’ve heard….
@@Hellsong89 Yeah but wouldn't it be weird if he just magically appeared with 6 F1 hand grenades on a video?
Whate does Edwin what's-his-face get them from?
Russian chanell "Крупнокалиберный переполох". have got it, and anti-tank grenades, and.... However, see for yourself, from 152-mm howitzers to NLAW
Considering these are only rated to stop 9mm Makarov at 50 meters, I'm honestly impressed with how it held up.
Helmets aren’t supposed to stop bullets
@@matthewjones39 outdated info. Most are rated for pistol rounds with some rated for rifles.
Then why do i own a Br2 and RF1 rated helmet
@Matthew Jones certain helmets maybe not but saying that in general is false not very many combat helmets can't stop at least pistol rounds
I'm not actually sure they are rated to stop only 9x18. Usually, the helmet visors are, but I feel like I remember these being rated for more.
Спасибо. Интересный тест🔥👍. Этот шлем пережил гораздо больше "издевательств", чем должен был. По нашей классификации это класс бр1. Основное его назначение, защита от осколков 1,05гр на скорости 630 м/с, при диаметре 6,3мм.
Так ИРЛ очень мало шлемов выше первого класса, ведь задача шлема это остановка вторичных поражающих элементоа на определённой дисстанции, это максимум что шлема должны остонавливать, возможно ещё и пистолетные выстрелы на дисстанции в пару десятков метров
Согласен. Замечу, природа у них как у нас. Видно как наш камуфляж подходит.
Было бы интересно если бы они поставили наш шлем и их шлем и повторяли бы одно и тоже с каждым шлемом. Интересно было бы посмотреть
@@ИванМаточкин-и5ы Тут главное для чего шлем ... Этот шлем очень легкий как они сказали ... И видимо основной упор защита от осколков и при этом что бы можно было носить очень долго многие часы ....дни
@@АлександраА-з5м так и есть. когда носишь шлем часами и днями - это утомляет, каким бы крутым и сильным ты не был. Поэтому масса шлема - это ОЧЕНЬ важно.
"There are several rifle-rated helmets, especially from OpsCore"
Oxide: "Are you sure about that?"
yessir! depending on the model
@@GarandThumb not even the RF1 was tested on bfd, opscore stated that
@@GarandThumb
Oxide: ARE YOU REALLY SURE ABOUT THAT?
@@GarandThumb wow
WTF is oxide?
Charlie’s mannerisms are comedic genius. It’s like a politician forcing his 9 year old son who’s awkward, tired, and perpetually hungry to public speaking engagements to show that he’s a family man
That's pretty much on point.
That’s so accurate I wonder how you thought of that. Who’s your daddy? Hahah
I tried to put into words what he was doing, but you already worded it perfectly! :D
Now I wana see flannel daddy run for/win office, and have charlie at events making innappropiate comments.
That's a accurate way to put it lmao
Side by side comparison of US, China and Russian latest Army helmets would be interesting
For no particular reason, of course
I saw recently that new Chinese helmets have an explosive built in them that can be remote detonated if they go awol and I’m not kidding.
@@tsullivan4 wtf💀💀💀💀
Bro Chinese helms got explosives built into em. You could just hack em and end a whole battalions career.
@@tsullivan4 It was just a hoax though
нормалдес шлемак, он кстати выдержал намного больше, чем должен был)
Господи, спасибо, что ты мне дал прочитать этот коммент. Просто мне так лень смотреть фулл обзор на английском
Сверх нормы походу изготовили
It'd be cool to see a helmet shot by common rifle calibers at different 100-yard increments to see how far it takes to stop. We often see stories of an ach stopping a rifle round over seas, but I never see any mention of the estimated distance it was shot from.
@@paulbarclay4114 Yeah you could theoretically catch a round from far away or a very oblique angle so that the helmet makes a difference between living and dying but it's such an outside chance you probably shouldn't be factoring it in.
@Paul Barclay there's several instances of an ACH stopping rifle rounds.
And if the helmet catches rifle round, your neck will be fucked
totally agreed ..
@Paul Barclay there was a marine that took one in Afghanistan directly from probably 5-700m away, he survived and was able to walk away from that.
There was also a soldier who took one in the middle of the bsck of his head, and survived and continued serving.
I'm not saying this is normal, I'm just saying it has happened before.
"For no particular reason, we have the standard handgun of the US military", I straight lol'd.
Fun fact, a 17HMR shoots a pill the same weight at same velocity as the shrapnel standard used for the PASGT / ACH. Might be worth looking into for all these ballistic tests.
Такой тест не будет корректным, все же пуля это не стальной шарик, медь мягче стали
Unfortunately the 17HMR uses a pointed bullet and so would not really be appropriate for "in lieu " substitution. Unless you could get it to wildly keyhole from the moment it left the barrel. Similar speeds but different shapes. Non aerodynamic shapes will cause greater injury but may be as little as fifty feet. The 17HMR is quite potent beyond a significant amout more. I like your way of thinking though, keep it up!
@@amorphoussolid8512Maybe shoot it through some clothing to initiate tumbling?
Whatever they do that "shrapnel test" they did was shit...
@@amorphoussolid8512 Shrapnel is often extremely sharp.
Considering that this helmet is lighter and cheaper than the American one, this is a very good helmet. in addition, the design of this helmet involves changing the trajectory of the shrapnel
lol no, it’s total shit, not enough propaganda will ever stand up the russian army again. What I love is that this helmet was bought because corrupt politicians and officers sold it on eBay. In the meantime ruskie solders get airsoft helmets and helmets with aluminum plates.
"OMG! you are paid by Russia..OMG, go take your credit social bla bla, OMG you are a Russian troll, OMG you hate America, OMG you are a bla bla bla"
Too bad half of the Russian military are being kitted with recycled helmets from Stalingrad 😂😂
@ужасы войны видел ещё до того как по тг каналам разошлось
I don't think it's that great of a helmet, it would have to be 1/5 the price for it to be worth using for your infantry considering that something like 9mm has enough power to deform it to lethal levels
You can make a helmet that will withstand a direct shot from .50 bmg, but then your neck will break under its weight.
This helmet demonstrates the golden mean. Excellent protection against various kinds of fragments, while your spine is still not injured when wearing. Also note how deep the helmet covers both the back of the head and the temples
I'd rather have an injured spine than be dead. There are plenty of helmets that stop 7.62x54/51 non AP rounds and allow the wearer to live with a TBI. This helmet is outdated by US standards but still better than nothing.
Once power armor becomes a thing you will have armor capable of stopping .50bmg AP. Then people will be carrying 20mm
@@moonasha standards??? Bro we dropped the good helmets and when with the ops core. It's not even rated for 9mm. The old ECH was a better helmet than the lightweight garbage that is the opscore. PERIOD.
@@ahole5407 who is we? Lol
@@moonasha You don't get it, it would literally tear your spine apart, you'd be just as dead. At that point it's entirely about the energy of the projectile, no penetration needed
In the next video, we will be testing the ballistics of the Russian MRE (it has superior ballistics than the 6B47)
But less edible
Literally same protection offered by American MICH. )
When I was in basic I got some good ballistics from my MREs....in the port-o-shitter.
@@davidjob4909 Same reason why this exported helmet isn't made out of cardboard.
@@davidjob4909 I guess you ignore the fact of how half your military commutes drugs and steals weapons and ammunition or traffics women?)
Charlie, is a national treasure. He must be protected at all costs.
Charlie: (wearing Russian gears)
Ukr Drone operators: (Breathing heavily)
Micahs cool too
No he is annoying and not funny.
@@bolshoibooze8010 Ukrainians have no attack drones left at this point☠
Thank you Mike and garand thumb team for everything you share with the people.
When I did my military service as a Vehicle crewman I remember when they refitted the Infantry with the Ratnik gear. It was popular because of how light it was. In the Russian military, there was always the long-standing sentiment that helmets were for cowards, thus many men used to ditch their heavy helmets and just wear a military cap/ushanka instead. The lightness of the 6b47 made helped change this sentiment.
doing the ushanka quest
Weight makes a massive difference. I have a American issued PASGT helmet, it's like walking around with a 2 kilo weight on your head.
Chads
Bullshit. But weight metter.
How come your not mobilized?
12:27 as we see, adding picatinny rail makes this helm pretty modern and modular
I'm genuinely surprised by the old school liner system the 6B47 has, like that shit is on par with old school M1 helmet liners
@@Lo-tf6qt yeah it's quite weird for when the helmet was designed and made. It's not uncomfortable to wear but it definitely takes more time to strap on
Maybe because they use winter caps under it so they need something slick to go around that warm layer
@@Lo-tf6qt The liner is indeed old school and somewhat uncomfortable to wear. But from what soldiers say, it does an amazing job at shock absorption.
If you're planning to fight people with 855a1 and Sig Spears, I feel like having an ultralight helmet that still protects against shrapnel is probably better than a heavy helmet that stops non-AP rifles which your enemies aren't using
fam we havent even got to M855A1 and .227 Fury and theyre already getting penned
Ukranian special forces got Sig MCX.
@@SmaxyMiguel those are MCX's, but yeah, pretty much same shit
Also as seen in Ukraine 98% of casualties is done by artillery.
@@soriddosuneko I mean, not really the same thing at all. The MCX Spear fires full size rifle rounds while the MCX fires intermediate rounds. The spear specifically fires the ridiculously zippy 6.8x51.
This Russian helmet has basically the same level of protection as the older ACH that I was issued. The vast majority of synthetic fiber helmets in the world are basically IIIA. The ECH can stop some rifle rounds because it is made of UHMWPE, a type of polyethylene. It should be able to float as well. I had UHMWPE plates years ago that would float. The downside of UHMWPE plates is they cannot stop steel core/tipped ammunition. That's why ceramic plates are still the most common.
Why cant they stop tipped bullets? Making the plate just a little bit thicker should work the AP ammo isnt that different from standard
@Captain Falcon huh? Steel core is not at all the same as lead
@@AlenB29 what you want is an ECH
ECH and IHPS helmets do stop rifle rounds but they are severely deficient in regards to backface deformation vs the ACH.
Source material: Oxide doing tests on the IHPS and any other ECH test out there.
ruzzian - you should write!
Отличный обзор!
Referencing the movie "Master and Commander" was a win all by itself. That movie is so underrated IMO.
Also, Charlie at the end just about put me on the floor I was laughing so hard.
Currently doing my kill 10 PMCs whilst wearing 6B47 and PACA task on tarkov lmao, how fitting
SAME, EPSILON CONTAINER ENJOYER
Я ношу 5 класс но я бегаю без шлема😅
6b47 is my go to for cheap nv runs
It also stopped a round of m80 today
Camo 6b47 is honestly my preferred helmet behind the Wendy or Ulach since it chops up the outline of the normal 6b47 and is also camouflaged- perfect for early or mid wipe
I once had a Russian Spetsnaz mountain MRE and drank one of the coffee packets that was issued with it.
I could smell my heart breathing.
Приносите свой кофе, мы не пьем это дерьмо 😂
If you really want to see God Ranger dip that shit
@@Александр-у8й6д Of course you don't drink it, usually Russian troops get 1 MRE per platoon 🤣
@@nonegone7170 its not because of availability... they operate differently then Americans. There's a reason Americans fear Russia?
@@nonegone7170 I love when westerners troll us, they think it's clever, but it just looks like a toddler shouting random words. Keep it up 👍
The guys at the front say it's a really good helmet as far as it's ballistic properties go. It's main drawbacks are its outdated retention system/chin strap combination and the fact that it lacks of PGD rails to mount headphones (the Ratnik system uses headphones that are worn under the helmet).
The prior can be solved pretty easily with cushion pad and a Team Wendy-esque retention system conversion kit, the latter is a bit of a challenge, so most troops opt to buy earless/semi earless helmets instead.
I freaking love their camo patterns
Я думаю вам следует обратить внимание на экспериментальные советские камуфляжи, там тоже много чего интересного есть 😉
Me either but most prefer multicam even among russians
@@Donetsk. Ik it's not experimental but mountain flora is beautiful
@@MrThomasMooroff dude multicam sucks, even US soldiers think so lol
Surprisingly light helmet, I've got one they're pretty comfy. The genuine covers are nice too.
agreed on that. I thought for sure that it would not perform to any standard. But it did pretty ok!
@@GarandThumb lol 😆
@@GarandThumb a Classcom TOR test would be sweet, I think they're a bit stronger than the 47 but dang they're not cheap
Pretty sweet at identifying you as a terrorist.
@@waty0usay1 What are you talking about?
That 7:56 synchronized "Oh WOW" chorus LMAO 😂😂😂😂
“Great job everyone! Reported head injuries are down 76%!”
“But the casualt-“
“LESS. HEAD. INJURIES.”
Survivor bias lmao, good comment
French Army field dressing station in 1915: „Merde. Fucking helmets. We have a lot more head injuries now. Ditch the helmets instantly!“
@@gleisbauer25 reminds me of WW2 when they would get planes back and they would reinforce the areas that were shot most. Except these planes were coming back, so they started reinforcing the other areas and had fewer losses
The question is: "Does this helmet protect the head?"
"Yes, we were able to identify him because his head was well protected. The sheet-metal in his plate carrier was, however, visibly shredded and covered in a red sticky substance."
Russian helmet doesn't work with US ballets...😂
I have seen a Russian soldier what was shot through the helmet and he had a big cut in is head of a few cm, about two inches but survived, just like in ur test at 9:40. He was so lucky..but i think not a normal single helmet will stop an AK round or AR round. Depends on the angle how the bullet hits.. with a direct hit it goes trrough all normal military helmets. I have seen lot of Ukrainians what were shot through the head and helmet and that were western donated helmets.
Sshh don't talk bad about western helmets its immposible.😂
Ukrainians are given Older helmets
Russians are Given Older helmets
Both teams have bad tactics and vehicles.
But, when you have the biggest economy in the world supporting you, nothing id imposible
@@Tomallgam3rz12 last time i checked combining guerilla tactics, milita tactics, and modern warfare is a fuckfest that should never be done
Oh, I think I saw that video!
This guy was so damn lucky
What a lie! Western helmets stop a direct hit by a T-34 tank projectile (after all, the Russian army has no others left). The Russian army fights exclusively on T-34 and airsoft equipment
Would love to see a full helmet line up get tested.
I would love to see you change your profile pic.
@@777SFINN777 first amendment
@@vexrich ...is totally irrelevant
Oxide has tested a bunch of Russian and has started testing Western American and Western nation helmets. They're really interesting.
Какая нахуй линейка шлемов? 6Б47 единственный в Ратнике
Charlie is so well behaved. Your a good Dad Mike!
Wonder why we have never seen Administrative Results and Charlie in the same room. Administrative Results and Charlie are the same person?
admin results = swagger souls. search that rabbit hole
Administrative Results is Semen Semenchenko, leader of the Donbass battalion. He always wears a balaclava, too.
It would be intresting to see what the helmet can take from longer ranges like 100-200m.
Rifle rounds would likely still penetrate and if not the BFD would kill.
Ты будешь мёртв!
@@Luciferisourgod что? на английском?
@@LadZeroUltra you will be dead!
use the built-in translator...
@@LadZeroUltra шаагаад байгаарай писда минь
Try the helmet of the Russian company ATLAS. In their community, they posted a photo of a helmet that stopped a 5.45x39 bullet. I would like to see how good it really is.
yes
Atlas helmet is one of the best russian helmets
Atlas is gigahelmet
@@desmoR666 garbage is place where u live
Да, только это китайские шлема))
Technical note: spalling come off the back of the armor plate when it fractures upon an impact. Fragmentation is what is reflected off the front of the armor.
I have to admit, those helmet covers are pretty sweet.
One of my favourite camouflage patterns
True, but I think adding a net would make it cooler. ❤
Charlie is always hilarious. Your guys' interactions might be a somewhat scripted comedy bit, but it's great.
"Slob on me Knobba" true slav
Charlie somehow looks and sounds even slower than usual once he put that russian PPE on..
He's the Carl of the channel. Dammit Carl
Now for me it is one of the best channels about weapons and equipment. After the "Large-caliber commotion" of course :)
🤙 Несомненно
This video went to another tier when Charlie referenced "Master and Commander." That is a great movie.
Would love to see a comparison to the US standard issue helmet.
about the same
Oxide has done a video on this, the answer is it doesn't do great.
@@leonleeoff2216 You okay?
@@Kav. good ol Polyethylene BFD
>Listen to Garand Thumb
>Watch Charlie
Есть шлемы более прочные и тяжелые, чем 6Б47, но долго носить их тяжело.
Шейные позвонки будут Вам гораздо более благодарны за 6Б47.
6б47, а остальные тяжелые, вот у товарища на сво старая американская каска времен войны в заливе, легкая и прочная, никакого алюминия и стали, каска полностью КЕВЛАРОВАЯ, сложно такую нам сделать? или так и будем своим же палки в колеса вставлять? Уточню, американской каске под 20 лет, обзоры на нее есть, держит всё, что надо, от остального спасет только стальной позвоночник в шейном отделе, начало нулевых, Карл
@@G.R.O.N.D. вообще у нас делают вполне себе реплики pasgt/ ach, тоже из арамидного волокна (колпак 100 например). просто они тяжелее при таком же уровне защиты по сути, чем 6б47. такие дела.
@@G.R.O.N.D. А где ты там сталь увидел? Клёпки?! Или крепление под ПНВ?
@@G.R.O.N.D. вас насправді нічого з цього вже не врятує)
@@olehmisko389 хру-хру..... Повитрянна тривога, ППО працюе, ховайси, уиии!!!
Can't help but wonder if the damage done by the guns before hand weakened the helmet for the shotgun, etc.
distinct possibility, unfortunately we could only get one of these
@@GarandThumb I think you can get more of those on AliExpress. They say their ceramic plates are competitive too. Polenar made a video testing them.
Only 1 ? I bet eBay has lots...
@@tcsailair7750 everything on aliexpress will be fake. The only way to get a real 6b47 is buying it from someone. No website to my knowledge sells ballistic 6b47's
@@floppa4335 the fakes might be better than the real thing
Charlie's comments have become half of the reason I watch this channel. The guy's humor is impeccable.
Charlie somehow looks and sounds even slower than usual once he put that russian PPE on..
Charley just never fails to amuse.
Это военный шлем. На войне ребята воюют с автоматами серии Калашников (или AR), снайперскими винтовками и крупнокалиберными пулемётами. Никакой шлем не остановит пулю Калаша (или AR) с реальных дистанций боя - до 100-150 метров. Шлем предназначен для защиты головы от осколков, падений и тому подобного... и в последнем случае от пули, которая прилетела по касательной или на излёте. А ещё на шлем удобно навешивать дополнительное оборудование.
Плюс ко всему энергию пули должна ещё уметь компенсировать и шея носителя шлема иначе будет травма позвонков. Шлем, который выдержит АК(AR) сделать не сложно, сложно будет его носить так чтобы не сломало шею при попадании, импульс же никуда не делся.
Helmets can also deflect bullets if hit at the right angle
@@BaconSlayer69 and more importantly - distance.
@@Thevol40k that too but most people rifle rounds including intermediate rounds can penetrate helmets at a great distance like 500 yards
🤓
Literally busted out laughing at "Charlie get some attitude!". It's the little gags and things (that most people edit out) that make this show- 'cause you know if you were there, you'd be clowning with your buddies too.
Charlie somehow looks and sounds even slower than usual once he put that russian PPE on..
I saw a video from Ukraine where a ukranian soldier got almost exactly this shot at 9:34
The bullet went right through the top of his helmet leaving him with a bleeding wound on his head but alive.
Lucky dude.
Can you link it?
there was a Russian soldier on that video. This helment is pretty good!
th-cam.com/video/Q_Ucod40JtI/w-d-xo.html
@@ShadeAKAhayate th-cam.com/users/shortsgrcm5oHWJzs
@@ShadeAKAhayate th-cam.com/users/shortsSHpUhbnufK4?feature=share
Mike asking Charlie if he has anything of value to add 😂 then the look he gives Charlie after he says “slobbamenobba” 🤣🤣🤣 ✊🏼
Don't forget to check out the Slobbamenobba Desert Institute.
I'm just commenting to boost the metrics. A guntuber being so popular must really piss off youtube. And this makes me happy
One thing I've wanted to see from you guys is how well common hunting rifle rounds would do against common plates and helmets. Maybe go all out and see how different loads do as well.
they would probably do bad against plates since vast majority of hunting rounds are designed to deform on impact not penetrate armour, aka most of them are soft points or some variations of hollow points, useless against armour.
@@thesayxx Well, my reasoning was mostly thinking about FMJ or other harder-nosed bullets. I just want to see what rounds like 6.5 Creedmoor and 7mm Rem Mag would do personally. I know what 7mm Mag does against deer, I feel like it would be fun to see if anything.
@@thesayxx idk, depends on the armor material. Spalling is not your friend. Also, many common hunting rounds have a lot more velocity and mass behind them than 5.56mm.
KY ballistics has this video
@@Dragunov1Bros
Anything a standard 5.56 shoots through, will do even worse against almost all FMJ hunting cartridges.
Most vest plates and helmets used by the Russians will not stand up to a high BC, high SD FMJ 7mm Rem Mag out to at least 400-500 yards.
Of course they have some vest plates that do, but the majority of their soldiers don't have those.
Has GT ever done a video testing a Opscore? Would like to see how they really hold up to rifle rounds. Cause Charlie and Dr Thumb provide science👍
Oxide has done that, they dont
@@fiskersproductions beat me to it
Oxide recently did one - we will be doing one as well
BFD is deadly even on handgun rounds their “rated” for
@SemperFiMac77 again, that's without any padding system or a head inside when Oxide did his test.
It would be cool to see you get your hands on the British Military Virtus combat helmet it has a detachable ballistic face shield too.
Учитесь русскому языку
Enjoy your videos, showing support!
Как всегда интересно и доступно)
Спасибо!
да, это не украинцы, которые кевлар ломают)
@@Волх-щ5г То была стальная Советская каска обёрнутая в пиксель. Зачем пиз-еть?
@@timberwolfmountaineer873 хохол своей башкой пробил стальную каску?
@@ОтеЦпапыКарлО-ы5ю кулаком. не пробил, а смял
@@timberwolfmountaineer873 да это фейковая показуха! Зеля Кокосович мастер на такие блокбастеры.
Every time I see tests like this, I think of that scene in “saving private Ryan” when they storm the beach at Normandy and that one soldier has a bullet deflect his helmet, so he TAKES OFF HIS FRIGGIN HELMET to observe the miracle and another bullet comes along and goes through his head.
Perhaps the best helmet is the one we made along the way
certainly seems to be the case
Shows up in foam helmet meant for kids with soft heads. "Reporting for duty sarge!"
Charlie with his trophy at the end. This is my favorite part (too)
Let's see a test on the current issue helmet for the Russian army Conscripts (Nerf Bump Helmet)
I would say let's check to see on the current issue for the Ukrainian Army draftees, but they ran out about 8 months ago. Now if they get anything, it's either something they bought themselves, or whatever some other nation donated. Been seeing PASGT's, that weird British thing, hell, even some old M1 steel helmets, but for the most part they don't have helmets anymore.
Ok yuck yuk yuk lol lmao so funny!!!
🤓🤓
we did at the end of the video :)
Watch until the end. They did test an airsoft helmet.
I know he has been in videos for a while but Charlie is a great addition to the team. Keep up the great work guys. Also if you haven't seen the last video yet check it out has one of the funniest lines I've heard in a while.
Charlie somehow looks and sounds even slower than usual once he put that russian PPE on..
I would love to get my hands on Ratnik kit someday. The camoflauge pattern an the look of the kit in general is very nice.
I heard you can get all the Ratnik kit you want for free in Eastern Ukraine. Might be a little dirty but a quick wash will do.
@@Atony94 edgy...
@@Atony94 plenty of preserved ones, frozen somewhere in a hole, get it quick before Ukrainian drones find him first!
@@Atony94 Oh, I didn't know that ukrainian soldiers are armed with Ratnik. Good to know, thanks!
I suggest hitting up Green Bean Gear in facebook, kinda pricy but are sourced from russia
Writing a comment for support.
You have always put out excellent content. Keep it up!
Educational purposes only, my guy Never gets political 🔥
He supports russia because trump lost the election and tucker carlson tells him to
Can understand the way they are thinking when it comes to this helmet, probably cheaper and easier to make(can equip more soldiers with it), stops small artillery/grenade fragments which most likely causing most of the damage in the current war. Both side use hand grenades extensively due to the trench warfare and drone warfare.
I doubt it is very cheap to make, considering the kevlar used in it.
All metal helmets are most likely much cheaper, faster and easier to make for the Russians, but they quickly get heavy if you want decent protection.
The main advantage this helmet has, is the weight.
If you are in a situation where you need to wear a helmet for hours, day after day, and the chances for heavy artillery hitting you is rather small, then this helmet is perfect.
@@The_Judge300 If you consider the fact that Russia is one of the worlds leading textile manufacturers, yeah it's pretty cheap to make.
@@The_Judge300 in civilian sale is around $140, without kit ofc
and for the military it should be much cheaper due to mass production
@@yastyman
I am sure they can make an all metal helmet without kit and sell if with a good profit for $50.
The Chinese can most likely do it for 20$ with a good profit.
A much better design to safe guard (hopefully) against a deformation kill is to have a thinner secondary skull wrap that is fitted on the head straps on the inside of the helmet (between the head and inside of the helmet. This could possibly prevent the sharpest deformations from hitting the skull directly.
That's what foam pads do.
Love seeing the m18 carry one every day
He just pops out from behind a rock..
Best intro ever.
Then hot shot Charles comes flying in decked out in the safest looking outfit on this pile of dirt ..🤣
Cudos to whoever put this together there is a genius amongst us.
Can we see pawn shop “hunting” rifles used in tactical situations. Like the old woodsmaster.
“Kevin McCalister style booby traps for dog killers using common household items”
Remember, just because your helmet can take a rifle round doesn't mean your brain can.
Also writing a comment to support. Watch you every week
I guess he didn’t see the recent test of the opscore “rifle rated” helmet. Sure it stopped the bullet but the BFD would kill anyone
For those wondering, i think op is referring to oxide’s test of the “rifle rated” xr helmet. I wonder how the RF1 will far?
Would be nice to see PLA helmets too!
If anyone is wondering what GarandThumb was doing behind that rock in the intro, go ahead and hit the subscribe button.
Hey I hope you're making a good, quick recovery. And I'm praying for you
Tactical and technical characteristics The helmet 6B47 provides protection from:
9 mm bullets of 57-N-181S cartridges of the PM pistol from a distance of 5 meters;
imitators of fragments (a steel ball with a diameter of 6.3 mm and a mass of 1.05 g) at a speed of no more than 630 m/ s.
He even exceeded his task.
You can also shoot from an RPG-7, of course)
You should do this with whatever helmets the UN is currently using...for science.
Pretty sure the UN Peacekeepers use whatever the country’s military uses.
I'd love to see this spall test on steel plate body armor with the spall coating and in a carrier.
16:31
Her: “its my first time”
Me: “damn bish u aint lyin”
Love to see the 5.7 used to test as the round was supposed to have been developed to defeat Sov armour.
and 4.6mm
They aren’t defeating shit without blacktips.
@@alexb7641 yup. But not too difficult to make your own. Buy commercial poly tip bullets. Use a jeweller’s lathe to shape your own penetrator from steel bar, and then replace the tops before loading. You might need a drop of loktite to hold the tip in place. Easy-peasy.
@@andrewallason4530 I know you used to be able to buy them for something ridiculous like $10/rd. FN has a stranglehold on those though. Be interesting to see an m855 loaded into one also.
@@alexb7641 yup. Not a problem here in Australia. Pretty much absolutely a no go for civvies to own. Some guys I know would love to get i to 5.7 for vermin control ( me included) but we are generally sticking with .223 or .308 on bigger stuff, and various .22s or .17s on the smaller ones.
the reason they dont use padding is because of RU Mod requirements. when the strapping is properly adjustet the helmet wount touch the head when shot within is protection class ( for example 9x18 ) in theory , you wont have any form of concussion when inside of protection calss while with padding even when surivable some bit of force will transfer to the head ( infact installing padding inside the 6b47 will be more harmfull ). i hope my english was good enough to understand. also dont forget that the helmet is comparatively very light wich was also a requirment. Russian forces right now have basicly a blanko check. I see Mobilized infantryment equiped with Classcom TOR , mobilised marksmen getting lobaev arms TSVL 8 M4 rifles etc..... So there is that
Lobaev rifles are dope, wanna review on that
@@c1n1kdtm50 sadly , probably most in the west dont know they exist. the most interesting rifle to look at from them right now would be LAR-10. its a very new rifle, in fsct so new its not listed in their website. i think a charchge of 100 rifles was sent to marksmen of the special military operation. whats so special about it ? its a direct opponent of the new SvCh rifle ( replscement for the SVD ) , its based o the AR10 design like thr name implies , chambered in 308, opposed to 54R , and is ALOT more accurate ( not worse then 0,5 MOA ). there is even one recorded use of that rifle on a human target at 800 meters away where the shooter fires 2 quick shots , bouth shots impact target nearly on the same spot and the rifle scope basicly hasnt moved at all wich was quite impressive.
@@старшийсержант-л7ш dear sergeant, stop providing our enemies with information about our small arms.
@@antonkucherov9215 ok i keep secret))))
@@antonkucherov9215 💤
Helmets are not designed to protect against bullets. They protect from fragments
Yeah he said that lol.
Every time garand thumb says back face deformation, an angle gets its wings
Garand Thumb videos are always great, only made better with Charlie participation. Charlie cracks me up every time.
Charlie somehow looks and sounds even slower than usual once he put that russian PPE on..
Compare with this th-cam.com/video/qOQc6tE-08A/w-d-xo.html
Please make a video showing how a log fort holds up to different rounds! Or more like what sized logs stop what bullets. Keep up the good work!
I think a long time ago Paul Harrell did 5.56 vs 7.62x39, I can't recall if it was a wall of telephone poles or railroad ties that he shot through as one of the barrier demos.
This is a helmet that does what it's supposed to do.
In other words, absolutely no worse than other helmets in this class.
agreed. Lots of information warfare going on
Well. In real life the Ivans will be getting airsoft helmets. 🤪
The problem is that the Russian defence industrial base is famously corrupt. Production batches for these items have extremely poor qc and are highly variable in performance. Helmet deliveries to the Russian Army have included steel pots with the 6B47 helmet cover and suspension system, units coated with substandard resin, etc.
@@armorynorth The problem is, there is NO ACTUAL PROOF of it being corrupt. Anectdotal hearsays and stories are no proof at all. Before anybody disses me, make your own, unbiased research. Much of what we know about Russia is complete bollocks. Much of what we think we know about our own native countries is even more bollocks.
@@LikePhoenixFromAshes yachts aren’t free
Thank you so much for this video.
Most of the battles are at distances of 100 to 150 to 200 meters.
In urban battles it can be barely 50-90 meters and the elevations of high-rise buildings. The main striking factor goes to the body and limbs. The head is rarely hit, unless of course you are a target for a sniper.
And finally, artillery and drones don't care what protection class you are wearing.
Even snipers are trained to shoot center mass A-Zone
@@flokejm3904 Well i mostly seen them going for headshot in this conflict since it's the only part that sticks out of a trench
i can see you have played a lot of counterstrike
very impressive but none of this is true
Basically, the protection of the bulletproof vest and helmet has a stopping action against shrapnel. It's like armor on a tank, only another tank is able to penetrate if there are no additional protective components that increase the thickness, such as the slope of the armor, active and inactive systems, and so on.
6B47 has stopped 5.45x39 in Ukraine.
@@ÆthelwulfOfNordHymbraLand2333 Source?
The "Slaba Minob" with the raised fist at the beginning had me ugly laughing for waaaay too long 🤣
Thanks for clarifying. I was kinda "Wha?" at this moment (I`m russian)
There's a lot of real combat examples in Ukraine right now showing these 6B47 Ratnik helmets stopping 5.45 and even 5.56 sometimes. 7.62 usually goes right through it everytime. Theres speculation of 5.45 maybe hitting or going through something before hitting the helmet and that's why it doesn't go through the Ratnik helmet. Believe it or not theres been a couple of Ukraine soldiers that had a 5.45x39 get stopped by a cell phone in his jacket. Which is very surprising since most 5.45 rounds Russia is using is the "PS" steel core ammo. There was another example of a Ukrainian solider actually taking a 30mm BTR round to his plate carrier and the plate carrier actually stopped it somehow... many people think that the 30mm round ricochet off of something before hitting his plate carrier and that's why it didnt just blow him and his plate carrier away. Solider got extremely lucky.
The 30mm must have been a ricoched. The round has between 300-400 gramms and is as fast as a 556.
The tip of the standard 5.45 round is hollow. Not a hollow-point but hollow inside the tip of the bullet. This is to cause deformation upon impact and having the rest of the bullet to tumble.
I'd call him lucky, but the thing is, guy got drafted, the moment you get drafted you know that your luck ran out :(
X on 30 mm. It’s a flying melting dildo
I call be on the 30mm story there. That is obvious Ukrainian propaganda.
You and Oxide should do a collab with testing these things. That'd be awesome to see
Oxide is prolly still in training rn
шлем как шлем. Со своими задачами справляется, да и не тяжёлая.
отлично справляется с задачей убить своего владельца заброневым от пистолета
@@s2k240 ну что то в тесте в этом не было никаких особо травм. Да и не для этого эти каски делаются. Основная задача это противоосколочная защита. А что бы пули головой ловить есть другие шлемы.
@@ДенисМалышев-э9ъ ага от пистолетного выстрела вогнулся шлем вовнутрь ты понимаешь что сам шлем пробьёт человеку черепушку, особенно в районе виска где толщина кости 2мм в прямом смысле
@@ДенисМалышев-э9ъ никакой шлем не ловит полноценные пули, таких не существует, шлем и правда придуман от осколков и рикошетов, но 3 класс должен останавливать пистолетный патрон
@@s2k240какого именно пистолета? Пистолеты разные и патроны тоже. Покажи мне третий класс, который удержит к примеру 7Н31)
А по факту, даже в видео из пистолета не пробили шлем. Вмятина скажешь? Так шлем не на прямую на голову надет. К тому же подшлемник предусмотрен. И опять же повторю, пробития нет, значит шлем соответствует своей номенклатуре.
Some of the best content on the Interwebs