King Gyanendra Framed for the Royal Massacre? | Dr. Sundar Mani Dixit | Sushant Pradhan Podcast

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
  • Watch Full Podcast: • Ep 292: Dr. Sundar Man...
    Dr. Sundar Mani Dixit is a general physician and the doctor of members from the Royal family. In this podcast, he shares his views and his experiences with the Royal family, politics, massacre, spirituality and much more
    Recommend us Guests for the Podcast: docs.google.co...
    For Business Enquiries: podcast@sushantpradhan.com
    PODCAST LINKS :
    Spotify: open.spotify.c...
    Apple Podcast: podcasts.apple...
    Google Podcast: podcasts.googl...
    Instagram: / sushantpradhanpodcast
    SPONSOR :
    The Physique Workshop: thephysiquework...
    Conversations spark ideas and ideas lead to actions that drive the growth of society. I believe long and unfiltered deep conversation is a lost art in this nearly perfectly presented world. And this is my attempt to have real conversations with real minds and present them to you. The goal is to learn from the greatest minds and take you on the journey.
    Do subscribe if you feel this would add value to your life.
    MY SOCIAL MEDIA LINKS :
    My Website: sushantpradhan.com
    Instagram: / sushant_pradhan_
    Twitter : / sushant_tpw
    Facebook: / sushantpradhantpw
    Tiktok : / sushant_pradhan_
    DISCLAIMER: The views, information, or opinions expressed in the TH-cam Channel and Podcast are solely the views of the individuals involved and by no means represent absolute facts. Opinions expressed by the host and guests can change at any time.
    !! Reproduction of this video or content is strictly prohibited. If done, it may lead to legal action !!
    TEAM MEMBERS:
    - HOST: Sushant Pradhan
    - PRODUCER: Biraj Neupane
    - EDITOR: Pranish Shakya
    - SHORTS EDITOR: Arjun Tiruwa
    - SOCIAL MEDIA: Luniba Innovations

ความคิดเห็น • 64

  • @sudarshankhanal2528
    @sudarshankhanal2528 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wrong person this time sushant ji

    • @Ishitmypantsfull
      @Ishitmypantsfull หลายเดือนก่อน

      Just because he said something that you don’t want to hear, he’s the wrong person? Get your head out of the ass and look at facts and evidence.

  • @user-mg7hn7rq1w
    @user-mg7hn7rq1w หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Point to note. We clearly don't use yards for measurement of length/distance. As a south asian county we reside in we are more inclined to use meters for a shorter distance and it's rarely we think of yards to define a distance. Aba meter nai navaye ni gaj or feet ma pani vanna sakthyo but he clearly used yards to implement the distance between the adc placement area and the venue of ongoing party. British imperial and US customary use yards for their length of measurement. He seems to regurgitate the report given to him by these foreign forces and that is truth he believes in. Just my observation.

    • @Ishitmypantsfull
      @Ishitmypantsfull หลายเดือนก่อน

      What a stupid point. You’re also speaking in English (mother tongue of the same British and American), did you also regurgitate whatever you’ve learnt?

  • @thenerd9874
    @thenerd9874 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Very convincing interview throughout but ONE MAJOR FLAW.
    Last month (I guess it was last month on Jestha 19 on Reporter's Club, not sure about date) he mentioned that the King was shot in the Billiard Hall, then other royal members, but Prince Nirajan and Queen Aishwarya had not been shot yet. Then, Queen Aishwarya ran outside towards Prince Dipendra and Prince Nirajan followed them, and that was when they were shot. Prince Nirajan in front of the statue and Queen on the stairs leading to the Crown Prince Dipendra's room.
    HOWEVER IN THIS PODCAST, he mentions that Crown Prince Dipendra shot the King, the Quen and other members in the Billiard Hall itself, and only then ran outside, when he was followed by Prince Nirajan, who was then shot. However, all the reports and evidences claim that Queen was shot on the stairs. How come he changes his narrative and tells the Queen was shot inside the Hall?

    • @KrishnaPun
      @KrishnaPun หลายเดือนก่อน

      STML 😅

  • @channeld4641
    @channeld4641 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    देखिएको दृश्य हुन सक्छ। षड्यन्त्रको जरो कता थियो भन्ने कुरा थाहा पाउन कठिन छ।

  • @VenomandEddieBrock
    @VenomandEddieBrock 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The assassins likely spared Gyanendra’s family probably to frame them and knew that the Nepalese society would blame him

  • @funkbudhaagurung9649
    @funkbudhaagurung9649 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    disagree again.... if he knew so detail about how and when and where he went n came... he should have knowen prince nirajan was with king gyanedra....why is he not telling that.... n prince was returned from chitwan or somewhere.... i dont know ...

  • @rameshbista6016
    @rameshbista6016 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    राजाहुने ब्यक्तिलाइ बिहेको कुरामा आमाको कुरा नमाने निराजनलाइ राजाबनाउने भनेपछि कसलाइ रिस उठैदैन??।दिपेन्द्र लाइपनी तेहि भयो होला।

    • @user-tg5ut6ic8l
      @user-tg5ut6ic8l หลายเดือนก่อน

      संविधानमा संशोधन गर्नुपर्छ र राई र लिम्बूको आदिवासी मान्यता रद्द गर्नुपर्छ: राई र लिम्बू समुदायलाई १९९० मा नेपालको संविधानद्वारा आदिवासी मान्यता दिइएको थियो। हालैका अनुसन्धानहरूले देखाएका छन् कि यी समुदायहरू उच्च मात्रामा मंगोलियन र मन्चुरियन डीएनए भएका बाहिरिया हुन्। यो तथ्यले आदिवासी मान्यता पुनर्विचार गर्न आवश्यक देखिन्छ।
      किरात सम्पर्क र झूठ तथ्यहरू: राई र लिम्बूलाई किरात समुदायसँग जोड्ने प्रयास गरिएको थियो, तर नयाँ अनुसन्धानहरूले यो सम्पर्कलाई असत्य साबित गरेका छन्। डीएनए परीक्षण र पुरातात्त्विक अध्ययनहरूले प्रमाणित गरेका छन् कि लिम्बूहरू मंगोलियाको स्टेप्पे क्षेत्रबाट ७ औं शताब्दीमा सिचुवानमा शरणार्थीका रूपमा आए। त्यसपछि १३ औं शताब्दीमा मंगोल आक्रमणको समयमा सिचुवानबाट उत्तरी तिब्बतमा सरे। अन्ततः, १६ औं शताब्दीमा उत्तरी तिब्बतबाट नेपाल र सिक्किममा आए।
      डीएनए परीक्षण र पुरातात्त्विक प्रमाण
      डीएनए परीक्षणहरूले देखाएका छन् कि राई र लिम्बू समुदायमा उच्च मात्रामा मंगोलियन र मन्चुरियन डीएनए छ। यसले उनीहरूको उत्पत्तिको सही ठाउँलाई उजागर गरेको छ। पुरातात्त्विक प्रमाणहरूले पनि देखाएको छ कि उनीहरू वास्तवमा नेपाल र सिक्किमका मौलिक बासिन्दा होइनन्।
      मुण्डुम पुस्तक र यात्रा कथा
      मुण्डुम पुस्तकमा वर्णन गरिएको छ कि लिम्बूहरूले आफ्नो मूल स्थानबाट एक कठिन यात्रा गरी विभिन्न क्षेत्रहरूमा शरण लिएका थिए। यो कथा उनीहरूको मंगोलियाको स्टेप्पे क्षेत्रबाट सिचुवान, सिचुवानबाट उत्तरी तिब्बत, र अन्तमा उत्तरी तिब्बतबाट दक्षिण एशियाको उपमहाद्वीपसम्मको यात्रा हो। यो यात्रा कठिन र चुनौतीपूर्ण थियो, जुन मुण्डुममा उल्लेख गरिएको छ।
      भूतपूर्व गलतफहमी
      अतीतमा पूर्वी र उत्तरी एसियाको विषयमा अपर्याप्त ज्ञानका कारण राई र लिम्बूलाई आदिवासी मान्यता दिइयो। तर, आजको विज्ञानले प्रमाणित गरेको छ कि यी समुदायहरू वास्तवमा बाहिरिया हुन्। यस आधारमा, संविधानमा संशोधन गरी उनीहरूको आदिवासी मान्यता रद्द गर्नुपर्छ।
      आगामी कदम
      संविधान संशोधन गरेर राई र लिम्बूको आदिवासी मान्यता रद्द गर्नु पर्ने कारणहरू निम्न छन्:
      1. नयाँ प्रमाणले उनीहरूको बाह्य उत्पत्ति प्रमाणित गरेको छ।
      2. नेपालको मौलिक बासिन्दा अन्य आदिवासी समूहहरूको अधिकार संरक्षण गर्नुपर्छ।
      3. गलत आधारमा दिइएको मान्यता फिर्ता लिनुपर्छ ताकि सही न्याय होस्।

    • @user2234yd
      @user2234yd หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-tg5ut6ic8l Kati chai spam garchas hau misinformation. 2 min ma verify huncha taile lekheko kura ma kai ni satya chaina vanera vele ko santan muji.Why are you so obsessed with my culture? You go around spreading false information and never reply when challenged. You even report my comments to silence me. Here’s why your claims are wrong and why our history is genuine:
      False Claim: Rai and Limbu communities are not indigenous and should have their tribal recognition revoked.
      Fact: Rai and Limbu communities have a long, documented history in Nepal. Respected historians such as Dor Bahadur Bista in his book "People of Nepal" and Chaitanya Subba confirm that the Kiratis, which include the Rai and Limbu, have been indigenous to the region for centuries.
      False Claim: DNA tests show high levels of Mongolian and Manchurian DNA, suggesting they are not native to Nepal.
      Fact: Genetic diversity in the Himalayan region is complex. Studies show that populations in this area have mixed ancestry due to centuries of migration and interaction. This does not negate the established historical and cultural ties of the Rai and Limbu to Nepal. Genetic studies like those conducted by Dr. C. K. Ramesh, which include populations across the Himalayas, support this nuanced understanding.
      False Claim: The book Mundhum describes Limbus as refugees from Mongolia.
      Fact: The Mundhum is a religious and historical text of the Kirat people, rich with oral traditions and cultural heritage. It does not support the claim that Limbus are recent migrants from Mongolia. Instead, it speaks to their deep spiritual and historical roots in the Himalayan region.
      False Claim: Recent research disproves the connection of Rai and Limbu with the Kirat community.
      Fact: There is ample archaeological and historical evidence supporting the Kirati origins of the Rai and Limbu. Inscriptions, ancient texts, and long-standing cultural practices affirm their deep connection to the region. Scholars like Dr. Harka Gurung have extensively documented the continuity of Kirati culture in Nepal.
      Offensive Accusations: Claims of Rai and Limbu communities fabricating history and inciting disputes.
      Fact: These accusations are baseless and offensive. The Rai and Limbu communities have a proud heritage that they have preserved through centuries. Spreading such misinformation only serves to create unnecessary conflict and division among Nepal’s ethnic groups.
      If you really cared about the truth, you would engage in a meaningful discussion and provide evidence for your claims. Instead, you choose to hide behind fake accounts and report comments that challenge your misinformation.
      For accurate information, refer to credible sources like Dor Bahadur Bista’s "People of Nepal" and Chaitanya Subba’s works on Kirati history and culture

    • @user2234yd
      @user2234yd หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-tg5ut6ic8lVeley ko biu hos tae. Eti saro ghinlagdo behora aaru kasaiko huna sakdaina. 2 min research garyo vaney thaha huncha tero spam purai fake ho vanera. Why are you so obsessed with my culture? You go around spreading false information and never reply when challenged. You even report my comments to silence me. Here’s why your claims are wrong and why our history is genuine:
      False Claim: Rai and Limbu communities are not indigenous and should have their tribal recognition revoked.
      Fact: Rai and Limbu communities have a long, documented history in Nepal. Respected historians such as Dor Bahadur Bista in his book "People of Nepal" and Chaitanya Subba confirm that the Kiratis, which include the Rai and Limbu, have been indigenous to the region for centuries.
      False Claim: DNA tests show high levels of Mongolian and Manchurian DNA, suggesting they are not native to Nepal.
      Fact: Genetic diversity in the Himalayan region is complex. Studies show that populations in this area have mixed ancestry due to centuries of migration and interaction. This does not negate the established historical and cultural ties of the Rai and Limbu to Nepal. Genetic studies like those conducted by Dr. C. K. Ramesh, which include populations across the Himalayas, support this nuanced understanding.
      False Claim: The book Mundhum describes Limbus as refugees from Mongolia.
      Fact: The Mundhum is a religious and historical text of the Kirat people, rich with oral traditions and cultural heritage. It does not support the claim that Limbus are recent migrants from Mongolia. Instead, it speaks to their deep spiritual and historical roots in the Himalayan region.
      False Claim: Recent research disproves the connection of Rai and Limbu with the Kirat community.
      Fact: There is ample archaeological and historical evidence supporting the Kirati origins of the Rai and Limbu. Inscriptions, ancient texts, and long-standing cultural practices affirm their deep connection to the region. Scholars like Dr. Harka Gurung have extensively documented the continuity of Kirati culture in Nepal.
      Offensive Accusations: Claims of Rai and Limbu communities fabricating history and inciting disputes.
      Fact: These accusations are baseless and offensive. The Rai and Limbu communities have a proud heritage that they have preserved through centuries. Spreading such misinformation only serves to create unnecessary conflict and division among Nepal’s ethnic groups.
      If you really cared about the truth, you would engage in a meaningful discussion and provide evidence for your claims. Instead, you choose to hide behind fake accounts and report comments that challenge your misinformation.
      For accurate information, refer to credible sources like Dor Bahadur Bista’s "People of Nepal" and Chaitanya Subba’s works on Kirati history and culture

  • @nepalionlinetv9657
    @nepalionlinetv9657 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    सकारात्मक विश्लेषण 🙏

  • @udayarajniroula-cr1xh
    @udayarajniroula-cr1xh หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    राजा दोषी छैनन् भने शनिले न्याय दिने बेला यही हो यद्यपि गोरखनाथको आशिर्वाद समाप्त भैसकेको छ।

  • @pratikrana6059
    @pratikrana6059 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is True!

  • @mevergreen7158
    @mevergreen7158 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Program fixed and plan added , massacre plan added after gyanendra fixed his program somewhere else

  • @ronishghale5290
    @ronishghale5290 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Katha ramro lagyo😂budo ni jhapa bata thiyo ki k ho in-depth story ma hera u tube ma majale explain gareko cha 😂

  • @simonkhatri3195
    @simonkhatri3195 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Dotor sahab tyo jawana ma jaba raja gajuri samma aayo ni helicopter ma k khaja khana rokyaki thiyo ki 500 ko weed kinnu lai thiyo hola ?

    • @dhirajsinghthakuri9728
      @dhirajsinghthakuri9728 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Queen ratna law sab jana lie hospital lagi sakyo paxe call garawko hunuparxa ani army lie arko dar vanako gyanendra lie ne marxa ke vanaraw hunasakxa tesalaw uslie army ko full escorting garawraw ktm ma lawrawaako hunuparxa…Still You can get weed in 500🫡

  • @dipendrakarki7920
    @dipendrakarki7920 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You have told investigation will be not conducted if anybody inherited power for that post: if Gyn hand was clear in this incident: we would have no the truth....ADC Thapa book is his narration version not the actual fact....he had just connected the dots of past incidents and come out with his version of results:

  • @YetiRaj-t2i
    @YetiRaj-t2i หลายเดือนก่อน

    This man is making story

  • @sagaradhikari7906
    @sagaradhikari7906 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What makes it suspicious is because of these questions!
    1) Who and what Dipendra called to on phone ?
    2) Who killed Dipendra?
    3) How come a drunk Dipendra could carry heavy machine guns??

    • @bpnk5237
      @bpnk5237 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He only had 1 glass wine, he wasn't drunk, he only pretended.

    • @FreeFire-rf9tv
      @FreeFire-rf9tv หลายเดือนก่อน

      tyo ghatana sthal ma vako churot ko thuto was taken for lab test, tesma no additional substance ditected.

    • @UMANGPLAYS
      @UMANGPLAYS หลายเดือนก่อน

      Either watch the full podcast or study the history...Nepali IQ yesai aru le j halla sunyo tei ma lagera low vako ho.

  • @KBG-28
    @KBG-28 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    He has nothing to gain but a lot to lose tei vayera navanya ho truth 🔮

  • @user-cg3xe6wd5k
    @user-cg3xe6wd5k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    अ।इताबाहादुर तामङ नातेदारहाेकि ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @avisekojha3131
    @avisekojha3131 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    America ko CIA vaniney le Marko vanera New York times mai prakasit garyaxa ani aarko dipendra tw hune wala raja thiyo kina marna parthiyo rw ani Tesco vayeni eklei le Kati janalai maryo eklai ani feri uslai kosle maryo budo vanta malai

  • @internationalwatchinglion5352
    @internationalwatchinglion5352 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dr. Dixit...give me one answer...would you destroy "The Burden of Proof" which will prove you innocent? ..than why did Gyanendra BB Shah during his reign, destroy the whole building where the Palace Massacre actually happened? furthermore why didn't he insist on a post mortem for further evidences to support his innocence?, ...Dr Dixit, didn't Gyanendra have enough intelligence not to destroy evidences that would eventually save him? Did he not have intelligent advisers to guide his actions in going against the grains to follow the judiciary legal system's protocol, all the while it was and is an ongoing investigation? Are you implying that Gyanendra is above the Law because of Royal Immunity? mind you, this is the 21st Century ruled by Laws and not one of those old barbaric days of the past Era when Kings were assassinated by their own family members to become the new King.
    Dr Dixit...your statement of not gaining any ground for speaking out the falsified truth is hilarious ..because your gain is an endorsement of being a King Maker!

    • @freddilon
      @freddilon 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      why did Gyanendra BB Shah during his reign, destroy the whole building where the Palace Massacre actually happened?
      -bcoz the investigation was already done and concluded that Dipendra was the murderer. It is the politicians that used this situation as "propaganda" to make the people believe that the investigation did not happen properly. And to keep it as a memorial would be terrifying as well as being a HIndu and believing that it would cast bad luck, it would be immoral to keep it as a memorial so it was demolished after the investigation was completed.
      why didn't he insist on a post mortem for further evidences to support his innocence?
      -A dead royal body was not postmortem like other ordinary people and even if it did happen it would not have identified the original killer other than dipendra himself which was already concluded from the investigation.
      didn't Gyanendra have enough intelligence not to destroy evidences that would eventually save him? Did he not have intelligent advisers to guide his actions in going against the grains to follow the judiciary legal system's protocol, all the while it was and is an ongoing investigation?
      - just because King Gyanendra had advisers does not mean they were "good and innocent " advisers. The king was surrounded by aristocrates and advisers who had their own hidden agenda and influenced the King as well.
      Are you implying that Gyanendra is above the Law because of Royal Immunity?
      -When Dipendra was declared King, Gyanendra was the reagent but he was not immune and the authorities was on the Royal institution untill the investigation was complete. King Gyanendra became immune only after being declared KING.
      FYI, even the US presidential system is considering "immunity" in this 21st century. if you want to know why a KING "must" have immunity. The emperor (King) of Japan was guilty of attacking Pearl Harbour (U.S.), after being defeated, the US came to Japan to accept the Japanese surrendering and to arrest the KING of Japan and the people of Japan defend him and did not allow the US to take their KING as prisoner which the US "respected" and did not pursue further.
      If anything you should be grateful that the only development that anyone has ever made in NEPAL was the Shah Kings.

  • @manjushreenath7597
    @manjushreenath7597 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Yo budho jasto waihaat koi chaina .

  • @TheRatedbinay
    @TheRatedbinay หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    gyanendra sanga k kura bhayo ko chai record hune, divyani sanga k kura bhako chai katai record nai nabasni? riss ko jhok ma baki sab lai hanna bhaune le paras lai chai uta jaa bhanera bhanna sakne mental state ma thyo bhanesi? tya bhayeko most people dipendra ko threat ma thyena but still he shot them, tara paras lai chai haat le uta jaa?
    ani afu ma lageko ques ko answer solve nagari tribhuwan sadan nai bhatkauna chai kina lagako re gyanendra le?

  • @Mundhum21
    @Mundhum21 หลายเดือนก่อน

    पारसे लाइ बोलायेर घुडामा ६/७ वोटा गोलि ह्न्नु पर्छ सबै कुरा ओकल्छ

  • @Untouched_Nepal
    @Untouched_Nepal หลายเดือนก่อน

    He telling inso details like he's the eye witness
    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @NIREY-7
    @NIREY-7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hawa podcast hai yo chai 🤣🤣

  • @rameshbista6016
    @rameshbista6016 หลายเดือนก่อน

    पोखरा बाट गजुरी सम्म राती नै गाडिबाट आएर चार बजे बिहान हेलिकप्टर बाट काठमाडौ सबारिभएको ।
    किनकी रातिको मौसम खराब थियो।

  • @NepaliSatire
    @NepaliSatire หลายเดือนก่อน

    Unsubscribed this ridiculous channel. Why would you invite such guest? So a kid named Nirajan has a gun but someone like Paras who was known for his gangster character did not have a gun? Really buda?

  • @u-nknown19
    @u-nknown19 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Kasto manxya lai bolako hou na cheeu melya cha na tuppo j oai tai

  • @user-cg3xe6wd5k
    @user-cg3xe6wd5k 22 วันที่ผ่านมา

    केरेकाेछाजनाता काेनातानासाेदिनुहाेस

  • @SubikManandhar
    @SubikManandhar หลายเดือนก่อน

    3 choti "sawri hos, sawri hos" vanera phone gareko re!! yin le chai kasari thapaye??

    • @user-tg5ut6ic8l
      @user-tg5ut6ic8l หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      संविधानमा संशोधन गर्नुपर्छ र राई र लिम्बूको आदिवासी मान्यता रद्द गर्नुपर्छ: राई र लिम्बू समुदायलाई १९९० मा नेपालको संविधानद्वारा आदिवासी मान्यता दिइएको थियो। हालैका अनुसन्धानहरूले देखाएका छन् कि यी समुदायहरू उच्च मात्रामा मंगोलियन र मन्चुरियन डीएनए भएका बाहिरिया हुन्। यो तथ्यले आदिवासी मान्यता पुनर्विचार गर्न आवश्यक देखिन्छ।
      किरात सम्पर्क र झूठ तथ्यहरू: राई र लिम्बूलाई किरात समुदायसँग जोड्ने प्रयास गरिएको थियो, तर नयाँ अनुसन्धानहरूले यो सम्पर्कलाई असत्य साबित गरेका छन्। डीएनए परीक्षण र पुरातात्त्विक अध्ययनहरूले प्रमाणित गरेका छन् कि लिम्बूहरू मंगोलियाको स्टेप्पे क्षेत्रबाट ७ औं शताब्दीमा सिचुवानमा शरणार्थीका रूपमा आए। त्यसपछि १३ औं शताब्दीमा मंगोल आक्रमणको समयमा सिचुवानबाट उत्तरी तिब्बतमा सरे। अन्ततः, १६ औं शताब्दीमा उत्तरी तिब्बतबाट नेपाल र सिक्किममा आए।
      डीएनए परीक्षण र पुरातात्त्विक प्रमाण
      डीएनए परीक्षणहरूले देखाएका छन् कि राई र लिम्बू समुदायमा उच्च मात्रामा मंगोलियन र मन्चुरियन डीएनए छ। यसले उनीहरूको उत्पत्तिको सही ठाउँलाई उजागर गरेको छ। पुरातात्त्विक प्रमाणहरूले पनि देखाएको छ कि उनीहरू वास्तवमा नेपाल र सिक्किमका मौलिक बासिन्दा होइनन्।
      मुण्डुम पुस्तक र यात्रा कथा
      मुण्डुम पुस्तकमा वर्णन गरिएको छ कि लिम्बूहरूले आफ्नो मूल स्थानबाट एक कठिन यात्रा गरी विभिन्न क्षेत्रहरूमा शरण लिएका थिए। यो कथा उनीहरूको मंगोलियाको स्टेप्पे क्षेत्रबाट सिचुवान, सिचुवानबाट उत्तरी तिब्बत, र अन्तमा उत्तरी तिब्बतबाट दक्षिण एशियाको उपमहाद्वीपसम्मको यात्रा हो। यो यात्रा कठिन र चुनौतीपूर्ण थियो, जुन मुण्डुममा उल्लेख गरिएको छ।
      भूतपूर्व गलतफहमी
      अतीतमा पूर्वी र उत्तरी एसियाको विषयमा अपर्याप्त ज्ञानका कारण राई र लिम्बूलाई आदिवासी मान्यता दिइयो। तर, आजको विज्ञानले प्रमाणित गरेको छ कि यी समुदायहरू वास्तवमा बाहिरिया हुन्। यस आधारमा, संविधानमा संशोधन गरी उनीहरूको आदिवासी मान्यता रद्द गर्नुपर्छ।
      आगामी कदम
      संविधान संशोधन गरेर राई र लिम्बूको आदिवासी मान्यता रद्द गर्नु पर्ने कारणहरू निम्न छन्:
      1. नयाँ प्रमाणले उनीहरूको बाह्य उत्पत्ति प्रमाणित गरेको छ।
      2. नेपालको मौलिक बासिन्दा अन्य आदिवासी समूहहरूको अधिकार संरक्षण गर्नुपर्छ।
      3. गलत आधारमा दिइएको मान्यता फिर्ता लिनुपर्छ ताकि सही न्याय होस्।

    • @user2234yd
      @user2234yd หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-tg5ut6ic8l Tero aaru kam chaina muji veley?Why are you so obsessed with my culture? You go around spreading false information and never reply when challenged. You even report my comments to silence me. Here’s why your claims are wrong and why our history is genuine:
      False Claim: Rai and Limbu communities are not indigenous and should have their tribal recognition revoked.
      Fact: Rai and Limbu communities have a long, documented history in Nepal. Respected historians such as Dor Bahadur Bista in his book "People of Nepal" and Chaitanya Subba confirm that the Kiratis, which include the Rai and Limbu, have been indigenous to the region for centuries.
      False Claim: DNA tests show high levels of Mongolian and Manchurian DNA, suggesting they are not native to Nepal.
      Fact: Genetic diversity in the Himalayan region is complex. Studies show that populations in this area have mixed ancestry due to centuries of migration and interaction. This does not negate the established historical and cultural ties of the Rai and Limbu to Nepal. Genetic studies like those conducted by Dr. C. K. Ramesh, which include populations across the Himalayas, support this nuanced understanding.
      False Claim: The book Mundhum describes Limbus as refugees from Mongolia.
      Fact: The Mundhum is a religious and historical text of the Kirat people, rich with oral traditions and cultural heritage. It does not support the claim that Limbus are recent migrants from Mongolia. Instead, it speaks to their deep spiritual and historical roots in the Himalayan region.
      False Claim: Recent research disproves the connection of Rai and Limbu with the Kirat community.
      Fact: There is ample archaeological and historical evidence supporting the Kirati origins of the Rai and Limbu. Inscriptions, ancient texts, and long-standing cultural practices affirm their deep connection to the region. Scholars like Dr. Harka Gurung have extensively documented the continuity of Kirati culture in Nepal.
      Offensive Accusations: Claims of Rai and Limbu communities fabricating history and inciting disputes.
      Fact: These accusations are baseless and offensive. The Rai and Limbu communities have a proud heritage that they have preserved through centuries. Spreading such misinformation only serves to create unnecessary conflict and division among Nepal’s ethnic groups.
      If you really cared about the truth, you would engage in a meaningful discussion and provide evidence for your claims. Instead, you choose to hide behind fake accounts and report comments that challenge your misinformation.
      For accurate information, refer to credible sources like Dor Bahadur Bista’s "People of Nepal" and Chaitanya Subba’s works on Kirati history and culture

  • @viratshah1512
    @viratshah1512 หลายเดือนก่อน

    maja le guf suni rathya then budo said this goli lagyo aajhai body ma xa , jhikeko xaina , too dangerous, WTF man

  • @changetrack2545
    @changetrack2545 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems like he has nothing to gain now,he has gained a lot already.

  • @Santoshrajkhadka1
    @Santoshrajkhadka1 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don’t believe dependra

  • @SOLTEE-YONJAN
    @SOLTEE-YONJAN หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wrong person to ask this question, yo buda ko kura dherai guff sune ko Xu 😂

  • @manishvai4375
    @manishvai4375 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ah yesle live hereko raixha massacre huney belama😂

  • @kohgamer3787
    @kohgamer3787 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All fake .Mystery gone with royal family.

  • @sambidbilaspant1163
    @sambidbilaspant1163 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ridiculous theory

  • @kritiklamichhane
    @kritiklamichhane หลายเดือนก่อน

    I dnt believe this guy
    Ultimately control remote is with india

  • @shaileshkarmacharya8030
    @shaileshkarmacharya8030 หลายเดือนก่อน

    HAWA

  • @rajukhaling556
    @rajukhaling556 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Like Funny yar.

  • @1amproduction639
    @1amproduction639 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With due respect to him , it seems he is scripted and there is no way he is so confident despite of not seeing through his eyes !! He knows ex kings are still alive

  • @Egrgg77
    @Egrgg77 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Guffadi🤨

  • @merodiary783
    @merodiary783 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bullshit

  • @voimgkl9098
    @voimgkl9098 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Black magic is the main reason of Massacre