You can be charged with a crime for trying to stop an attack dog from mauling you. Police will use your resistance and an excuse to further harm you. That’s a nightmare
@@nobodyspecial4702 Looks like someone ignored the part where a black man was mauled by a K9 when he had his hands up. The handler set the dog loose after the man clearly wasn’t resisting.
@@nobodyspecial4702 you are privileged if you think every cop is like that, not saying all cops are bad but if you aren’t in a ghetto area or environment you probably wouldn’t understand. People gotta see it from every perspective from the cops to the people in the communities unfortunately nobody’s perfect and cops are included so no just because someone isn’t resisting doesn’t mean he or she will be treated civilized
When I was young I had a person break into my house at night, he was running from the cops ,broke in thru the window not even 2 seconds a k9 came in thru the window and got between me and the criminal. The dog just kept barking and barking at the guy and the dog just held him there until his handler gave a command and was arrested. My dad asked the officer why the k9 didn't attack. The officer said this dog was trained to bark and hold but if he becomes a threat the dog will attack until the handler calls him off. That dog saved my life
Working k9s are so underrated, they are so gentle with kids and know the difference between an active threat and an innocent bystander (with the proper training ofc, I know some police k9s aren’t held to a high standard of training and I definitely think that needs to change)
I can usually pull myself to see the other side with Vice. However, I do not agree with the usage of your stats regarding Black, white etc...IF you are committing a crime and you get bit, you were first committing a crime. That sees NO color or race. Don't blame it on the dogs, the dog handlers. Blame it on the individual that is committing the crime! Period!
This is what I don’t understand. He probably had a record and got spooked and ran. But what’s still unclear is why the dog was let loose. Gun recovery is not a good reason, especially if was not on his person at the time.
So release the hounds? Are you insane? Just took the ticket? So the ticket is not a big deal? So then who cares if he runs away from a ticket if the ticket is not a big deal? Im sure there are real crimes cops need to be attending to
@Emily Trembley That's what I was thinking. If the gun is the threat in their minds and it's in the dang car and not on the suspect, then there doesn't seem to be a reason to involve the dog. Those cops WANTED to sick the dog on him.
There was a police chase awhile back in Cali where the dude ran into a store. When a customer came out he was attacked by the police dog. It was all filmed by the news chopper. The whole time the guy in the chopper was like "that's not the right guy, that dog is biting the wrong guy. This will cost the city"
That is the dog handler's fault not the K-9. The dog handler decides who is friend and who is foe. Not the dog, the dog is not smart enough to know who is good or bad, only the K-9 handler. It proves the point that its human error, the dog will do whatever is commanded.
of coarse the criminal who ran from the police is going to say he had his hands up and was not resisting as he hid in a bush were no one could see...and say the police should not have dogs...hell he probably thinks they should not have guns tazers cuffs...hell he probably thinks they should have to catch him with a butterfly net or pillows...
@@sciencehistoryandentertain734 you must be a cop lol and the British cops can go around with out guns and I'm not even saying not to use it for sniffing out purposes but you being a cop you no how some of you guys act just like criminals that get to hide behind the badge and you guys shoot ppl with there hands up but wouldn't send a dog on someone with there hands up oooookk🤣
Teaching a K-9 to attack and maul is literally no different than breeding a fighting dog. Literally ANY other dog would be put to sleep for the same behavior, regardless of its training. Pretending as a if a recall command works 100% of the time seems highly illogical and unreliable. Some of the general public and licensed dog trainers are just as valid as LEOs when it comes to instilling a dog with discipline, and can still fail at fully correcting behavior. Now, imagine said K-9 is put into practice, within highly intense scenarios, surrounded by officers yelling and issuing commands. It seems highly cruel to promote an animal to perform in high-stress environments that can potentially cut their life short in more ways than one; which does happen. I just don’t see how this makes sense to anyone who advocates for this? These are the same people that claim to love dogs, but have no problem watching them be taught to be vicious? Don’t even get me started on the historical intentional police use of dogs in AA communities and prior. The theory of intergenerational trauma also speculates that our history may be the reason why many people of similar descent show an innate fear of them, regardless of the breed. How about we find an alternative method for operation, rather than using another life-form that we see as family, as collateral.
I got attacked by a police dog when I was 14. A 14 year old white girl. They killed the dog and the people who trained it didn't get in any trouble. I'm lucky it was a young dog in training because an adult one could have broken my arm.
I’ve been reading vice since they were just a magazine. It’s fun to watch them devolve , and they occasionally still put out good content…. And I’m a bot.
Why can't you?In most countries, dog bites are considered grievous bodily harm, and Police are not allowed to use grievous bodily harm to subdue non violent criminals.
02:08 What was the reason? He responds that there was no reason.... HE WAS RUNNING AWAY FROM POLICE - that was the reason! Their job is to catch criminals, if someone is running away he is supossed criminal. If he stayed calm as he should have been he would still have his eye. Pretty clear to me.
@@mrmotofy Only if the dogs owner is not around then you can do this cause he/she might attacked you, while you’re on the dogs neck. Btw YT now just blanket blocked comments for no reasons. I don’t think anyone can see your reply.
K9 dogs 😂😂😂don’t give hormons too dogs Belgium have the best trainers and the best dogs stay in Belgium And my dogs are trained like a machine And dogs have a not good training,their wapens Some people may not have this dogs....
@@WingWingHerro TH-cam is such a failure. People don’t want censorship, I’ve never heard of a blanket block.😂 I’d bet they did that to some of my comments
It's funny how the police will send a dog in where it's too dangerous for a man... Yet they'll kill you if you even so much as breathe wrong on the dog. You are worth less than a dog, to them...
Well, yeah? Violent criminals are worth less than animals, they're hardly even people. You shouldn't trouble yourself by being concerned with their wellbeing.
@@noyerbua9243 except if you watched the video tard one of the k9 OFFICERS said himself other k9 police, that he worked with, use it to victimize people for fun/racism
How silly of you 😆🤣😂 and just how do you think these K9's are trained? Go watch some Shield K9 videos 😂🤣😆 these are dogs... do dogs run whimpering when they get into dog fights? OMDOG!!! rotflmao
@@Guranga93 I guess you missed the video of the criminal swimming across a river that stabbed the K9 in the head seven times & God bless that dog he kept going! Check out SheildK9's channel for more. Very specific temperaments are selected for K9 training. Famous quote-"I never saw a wild thing take pity on itself" I guess you've never had to track a deer? Or a bear? I've tracked blood trails very far. I've had to dispatch bears and deer that have been hit by cars. Animals are alot tougher than humans... Ever seen a dog fight? 🤔 Poke out the eye of a K9 officer and see where that lands ya 😆🤣😂 they bite harder when they experience pain so do your homework. You never know who you're talking to in the comments 🧐
@@reneehouser2925 I watched the video and the stabbing had the expected effect, the dog let go of him. It works. It swam around didnt know what to do. I have yet to see a dog (or any animal) that won't hesitate when its eye is being gouged out. YoU nEveR kNow wHo yoU'rE TaLkiNg tO In tHe cOmMenTs. CRINGE.
As cute and fluffy as dogs are, having a dog chase and take down a dangerous suspect is more safe to the humans in question. I’d rather a dog die than a human being.
@@HopeF749 My job isn't to educate you. YOUR job is to NOT speak on topics you know nothing about. Why are you talking if you are confused? Yes that is de escalation, it can be. Its using a lower level of force, when a higher level of force can be justified. So if pointing a gun at you can get you to comply, instead of beating you with a baton, then yes, pointing the gun is de escalation.
@@handled99 lmao no. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/De-escalation#Police_and_corrections De-escalation means REDUCING the tension in a situation. Adding steps into the use of force ladder is not the same thing.
He's right. The dog's presence can often times prevent situations from escalating because the suspect doesn't want to get bit so they comply vs fighting. The visceral reaction of fear due to the K9 is much more powerful than knowing the cop has a gun, often times. The issue is the handlers using the dogs responsibly and maintaining their training- which is unfortunately up to each department to regulate internally. I say this as a civillian K9 handler. Give working dog radio a listen if you want more information on how these dogs are actually used.
That happened in my town.. Plymouth, Massachusetts. A police k9 attacked his own handler and wouldn't stop, the cop had to shoot and kill his own dog...
@@andrews9719 I can find you the video, but it would probably be a waste of time? Lmk if you want to see it and I'll hunt it down. It involves a cop punching his dog in the face while it is between his legs just after they get out of their vehicle at the end of a car chase. Or if you don't think that's abuse lmk and I won't waste my time.
This is false information. The first guy who fled from a traffic stop is literally actively resisting. Tense, pushing, pulling, fleeing, all levels of resistance. Just because you fled and laid down in hopes of not getting caught, then that’s on you. And it’s considered a spontaneous bite. We give commands as we track so it’s not a surprise when we find you.
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl Yea, I live in Toronto Canada - we have a bit of gun violence but nothing like it is in the States. Those guys are insane. They are just wiping themselves off the planet. They need to make it harder for people to get guns. And the argument that guns will protect them is ridiculous. With that logic everyone will have a gun and everyone will be shooting - therefore more gun violence. Look at Singapore, Japan, China, and South Korea - 0.01 to 0.02 per 100,000 people. You think people are shooting up schools there? I mean their goverment is kinda fucked up but for gun violence stats it goes to show how much it works when people just can't buy guns.
@@JohnSmith-pn2vlWhich group commits over 55% of all homicides and is only 13% of the US population? Why is it never addressed and nothing ever changes? It's like the richest 1% want us to stay deeply divided?
So the gun should be banished forever since it was the gun that killed the person and the human being who used the gun should walk freely right? Got it. 👍
If somebody shoots a police dog the dog is considered an actual cop and you will do a long time in prison Soooo if the dog attacks me while I'm not resisting and it's using excessive force you should be able to sue the damn department just as equally right 🤔
Having you face mauled off is considered necessary force. Departments have repeated investigated themselves and found it acceptable to have a guy's throat ripped out over stealing a beer.
It’s called dark humor, and it’s unfortunately normal. From Law enforcement, to medical personnel to those in the military, etc. the vast amounts of horrific things you endure in those jobs causes you to be that way. Maybe if people would change their behavior like simply obeying simple rules then maybe less people would get into trouble and get hurt and or killed.
broo that black guy ran from the cops the did there job and got him so it was his fault the dog bite his dumb ass BC HE RAN...no matter if hes black or not HE RAN
@@Vet0714 Police are under constant stress but can't be allowed to take that stress out on other people, calming down a situation should be their priority not yelling, screaming, and making jokes at people getting hurt, cops are embarrassingly bad at de-escalation and alot come off as rude, demanding and forceful and this is the exact reason alot of people are scared of the police and dislike them because a simple situation can turn crazy just because a cops having a bad day
@@Vet0714 They can endure whatever the hell they want, no officer or citizen is above the law, and those pretending to be should be punished to the maximum extent of the law.
im sorry but the guy who lost his eye ran away if he had stayed he would have been fine this happens in alot of cases where they run and get hurt because of it or they end up with more time in prison because of it.
Thank you finally some one understand the situation if he would have never left then he wouldn’t get hurt!! People right away want to criticize cops ok the department but no one take about what cops have to go through on a daily basis I don’t see any one protesting telling people that they have to respect cops to get respect back.
@@samc6194 that’s true but he didn’t loose it because of possession he lost it because he ran from the police. The problem we’re facing is that’s the public doesn’t respect cops because of certain events that have happened and cops are on super alert and might act more intense because there scared some one might try to hurt them. For example about 2 weeks ago I got pulled over and the officer said it was because I didn’t move to the other lane while they had had another car stopped he was a lil nasty so I waited for him to finish and then I explained to him that he saw me yield when I passed them and I ah knowledge that they were there and he had no reason to get nasty and that was it we both understood each other. I think that’s what we as the public need to do record and show them respect And if we feel that we were mistreated for any reason file a complaint and if nothing is done then yes we should protest peacefully but if we don’t respect them they won’t respect us! !!show respect to get respect!!!
@@mr.b3168 Quite honestly, the only crime mentioned is weed. I think they need to get away from criminalizing weed, since everybody uses it (except me).
You're not moving , you're not resisting anymore ..... Thanks to that K9 Officer. Job well done officer. Next time don't do wrong and don't try to run after the matter.
yes, using attack dogs is simply a terror weapon done to harass and brutalize the population while not having the officer himself be responsible and instead an animal, who does not have the same legal obligations as a human, can brutalize you without seeing justice. it's sickening.
Anyone who knows anything about police works knows that k9 units are essential. This video, at best, showed that k9 usage needs to be monitored, but not that it should be taken away from departments.
I think they are an extremely valuable tool as rescue and explosives dogs but for drug K-9s it seems like the cops just signal whatever they want. I had a dog "alert" on my car here in NJ and they tore apart my car only to find nothing. So clearly something fishy was going on.
@@alexanderorr2528 I think searches initiated by dog hits should be evaluated. If the results of that evaluation show that dog initiated searches are mostly false positives, then their use should be monitored or restricted. The only problem I can think of when saying that is false positives could result from prior drug use in the vehicle. For example, a pot smoker who smoked pot in his car last night, but wasn’t transporting any during the time of the stop.
@@alexanderorr2528 What @Andrew said. Dog's sense of smell is literally thousands of times more sensitive than humans. They can even smell bodies under water. So if it wasn't you then someone you had in your car triggered the dog. You CAN request a second dog to scan the car. You can tell the officer that you think the dog is wrong and you would like a 2nd dog to check because you are 1,000% sure there is nothing in the car or on your person.
The amount of criminal sympathizing in these comments is stomach turning. Hopefully one of those criminals that you're so against a dog taking down doesn't show up at your back door one night.
I don't understand? do you value a dogs life the same as a humans or more than. Dogs don't act alone when serving they are taught, improper conduct lies with the officer.
There's many uses for K9's that exist outside of catching criminals for police, just because your IQ can't see that a vice video is biased in its own right depending on who they interview and the questions they ask.
@@FierceZs1 What a stupid thing to say, I mean are you even old enough to have a TH-cam account? 😂😂🤣 That’s like saying “Oh yea dogs can hunt incase you didn’t know” 💀
@@FierceZs1 That's the point right there. You're saying, 'uses for k9s'. They are animals, they are sentient beings with their own emotions. They're not our slaves to do with as we please. And before commenting on people's 'IQs' I suggest you take a look at your use of punctuation and grammar. If you want to get into the ethics and morality of it all then feel free but anyone with half a braincell can see you don't have much going on up there. When you remove yourself from your mother's breast and grow up a bit perhaps you'll work on attacking the argument itself rather than straw-manning it and trying to correlate things that don't matter.
19 hours and over 2k comments. Seems like everyone has been harrassed by a k-9 unit at some point or another. like when they make you stand outside in the cold with a baby in your arms in winter while they let the dog run around your car.
Dogs are amazing animals and can do great work in things like search and rescue, explosive detection, and medical alerting, but I fully agree with the professor that training our oldest companions to attack us is cruel to the dogs and people and flat out wrong.
so youre valuing the life of a human over an animal, and that is kinda disgusting. you dont seem to understand the fact that the dogs attacking criminals prevents the officer getting close and being injured as well as keeps the criminal from receiving a lead injection. but hey if you truly believe that dogs have no business in this line of work, please join the police and volunteer to be the 1st person in to a room with an armed suspect, that way another human doesnt have to risk their life, and so you can show everyone else just how its done; and hopefully...ya know...the world will have fewer people spouting nonsense afterwards
Dogs have been used to protect humans for as long as we have coexisted.. it is why we have alot of breeds we have today. It had a purpose then and it has a purpose today. What happened to that guys eye is horrible, no question. But the arguments being made here are nonsensical if you look at why dogs are used for protection. Should this same logic be applied to livestock guardians? Police dogs are a form of protection dog, trained to be aggressive with certain suspects just like police are..it makes sense and saves human lives. A belt has been used as a tool of abuse as well, does that mean we shouldn't make belts anymore?
When I first watched this video there were a lot of comments pushing against the video's message. But suddenly, the comments seem to be gone now and it's not like they vanished into thin air.
Dogs have saved many people time and time again, and they've caught many criminals. It is what it is. People who cry about animals are the same ones that eat meat.
The crime doesn't fit the punishment. All you are implying, is that all Black people, have no rights. If we make a mistake, that puts us in contact with the cops, we no longer have any human rights. Again.. You ARE implying that Black people are NOT innocent, until proven guilty. However, you are also implying, that I have no right to a public trial, by an impartial jury of my peers, or even a judge. The police have collectively decided, that THEY will enforce, “The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment” They believe, that this will allow them to be the judge, jury and executioner, when they interact with the public. They feel like this is the loop hole, and you only reinforce that belief, when you make statements like this. The worse part? The whites seem to have no self-preservation, and act as though that are not affected by this too! Whenever Black people talk about police violence, the whites yell at us, “It happens to everyone not just the blacks”, and, “Why don’t you talk about black on black crime.” They also love to yell out, “Why don’t you talk about police crime, when it happens to white people!” But we do. Yet the only comments I will then see from the whites, are basically saying we’re being disrespectful of the hard work the cops do 🤢 When all we are doing, is complaining about police violence against us ALL. 🤮 But if at that moment, we happen to only be talking about how policing affects Black folks? Well, then we are race baiting. So I have a question for the whites. Why are the higher-caste whites, so silent about state violence, on poor white folks? Why are there not more whites worried about the drugs in their neighborhoods. Or why are they only worried about drugs in their neighborhoods, now? Also, why do whites insist on focusing on marijuana? Why are the whites not demanding free mental healthcare for their youth? You know, so that they’re not unaliving themselves, or taking their guns into schools and businesses and shooting up everyone. Or terrorizing their own family! Why do Black people have to keep telling the whites, that this is not normal?! Why are the whites so willing to get so little from their government, while paying for it with their lives? Is it just to hurt Black people, the people apart of the LGBTQI+ community, or anyone whose views oppose theirs? Someone please explain this to me? The whites need to sit with that, unpack it, and hopefully grow. But I suppose most whites would call that being “woke”, or “forced learning of CRT”. Yes keep willfully ignoring the generational trauma, that the whites inflict on their own kids. “The blacks running from the dogs are the TEAL problem, plaguing America.” 🙄 They are destroying their own community from within, and at this point I’m like, if they die, they die 🤷🏾♀️ The last question is for my fellow Black people. Why do we keep advocating for the freedom, of a group of people, who has lost the last little bit, of their remaining common sense? They do not want our help. Some us still need to learn, that No means No. 🤷🏾♀️
In this topic, you have to remove whatever biases you have towards either side and just think logically. Sometimes it’s better to listen to understand than to listen just to deflect and be combative due to your own personal biases Resisting is it’s own topic itself. There are thousands of police body cams, dash cams, video surveillances across the internet that show people be beaten,shot, and bitten by police dogs for NOT resisting. Hypothetically speaking, if there were to be a NON VIOLENT drug dealer/user or non violent criminal in general who was trying to resist and flee does that warrant being mauled by a dog? Does that warrant being shot? There are different protocols depending on what crime the person did and how they behave afterwards. If you have a robber or mass shooter who just committed murder and they resist and run, they are an immediate threat and should be shot down by police. These every day scenarios always consist of policeman sicking dogs on people who have drugs stashed in their property. What’s the point of having a judge and courts if we will just allow law enforcement to make their own judgments and punishments based on their biases?
When was the last time you saw a cop considering restraint? I play wrestle with my Sheppard and he never ever bites me with that much anger or malice. That wasnt toy training, that was training to injure.
Lawsuit. Its cruel and unusual punishment at its finest. No one should lose an eye over a traffic stop and weed. I would sue millions of dollars or ask to put the dog down. LE shouldn’t use a k9 as a weapon, but a tool to sniff drugs or search and rescue.
It's hilarious how much of a clown you have to be to take these videos that seriously. The rate of which that would even happen is so low to even justify your ignorance.
@@cicolas_nage and right there is the issue you can’t reason with the dog can’t park in with the dog you can’t surrender to a dog, so it should not be used as a weapon. I have no issue with using dogs to find people or bodies, but to use them in this way is disgusting and grotesque as well as any person trying to justify it. It’s the textbook definition of inhumane.
I feel like another thing to consider is the dog was told a command and it executed. If it weren’t for the officer’s command and release, that could have possibly prevented all of this. I don’t see it being the dog at fault but the officer in charge of the dog 🤷♂️ dogs have helped us humans for a long long time! ❤🐶
I agree. They train these dogs to be weapons of destruction and that's what they're going to do. They are animals, so if that's a good idea I just don't know. They seem to be very inaccurate when it comes to free air sniffs which allows a violation of our right to deny a search :(
Combat police dogs should not be used. Sniffing for bombs is one thing, training an animal to attack and hurt people is completely different. There are still many abusive training methods used on K9 units, and these dogs are put in danger. Let the humans who CHOSE to be in danger take care of it. Using a dog is cowardly and cruel. They will get just as much enjoyment doing any other job, and there is no reason to be training animals for violence. If you genuinely do care about the well-being of these dogs, you would not support it. But no, these dogs are to you what they are to the police department. Tools. Human aids. Not deserving of rights unless they serve YOU a purpose. Dogs are dogs first, companions second. They have just as much jurisdiction as you or I to be here. If you value their usefulness for us before their comfort and happiness I don't know what to say man, you are part of the issue.
DEFINITELY! I HAVE FRIENDS IN THE NYPD, AND I ALWAYS TELL THEM THAT DOGS SHOULD NOT BE USED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT! THE MAN IS CORRECT, WHEN A DOG IS ON SCENE, THE PIGS MAKE SURE THAT THE DOG BITES THE VICTIM!
I've seen more bad then good when using K9s! Just last year seen a live chase and bit a bystander coming out the liquor store instead of the real suspect in LA!
There's cases where they raided the wrong home and there was question as to if they said warrant and when the man defended his family, he got off free and he had to shoot. Now I ask you, if an officer bit you... [are you cool with it?]
If vice wasn’t so bad at reporting they would’ve included footage of K9s biting innocent civilians. It’s happened plenty of times, as well as K9s turning on and fatally mauling their partners/trainers.
Yes. Obviously yes, and it's been an obvious "yes" for almost a decade at this point. Researchers have assessed the error rate of sniffing dogs many times and the results are clear: sniffing dogs are no better than chance at detecting/distinguishing controlled substances. As for using them to attack people, I don't know why this country allows police to violate state animal welfare laws. Police K9 training programs have been repeatedly exposed for using training techniques that would be illegal under animal welfare statutes in most states, and if a dog is being used as a weapon against a dangerous person then the police are just as responsible as the dangerous person for wounding/killing that dog. This isn't even touching the base unethical nature of state authorities using dogs to detain/attack humans in general, which can result in permanent disability or death (to a person who has not even been convicted of a crime yet or given any form of due process) not to mention the unnecessary amount of pain inflicted onto people who are attacked by these dogs as police K9 officers rarely have sufficient strength/control to prevent people from being bitten multiple times before the dog is successfully pulled away. They can't even fully prevent themselves from being bitten by the dog they are supposed to control! And yes, people have died from police dog bites just as people have died from non-police dog bites, because while the bite is virtually non-fatal the secondary effects like sepsis are very much fatal if not detected and treated immediately.
Don’t comitt crimes. Don’t run from LE. Don’t resist and these lovely pooches won’t get you. There is no racial “disparity”. Numbers don’t lie. You comitt more crimes than others, you get bitten more often.
No dumbass you shouldn't have oh but I'm guessing you have prior and being caught smoking a blunt with your home fries at the basket ball courts is usually not OK! You said 20 states and not all of them. If you don't like that move to a state that it is legal. Or come to Canada where it's legal federal
Because that's true , he shouldn't have run , running only makes it worse for you . It doesn't matter if it's legal in other parts of the country , if it's illegal there , it's illegal , you can't run and say " it's legal in x states tho "
as stated in the video the dog was brought out because of the firearm found in the vehicle as well. meaning they don't know if he is still armed with another firearm and with a dog he/she has a better sense of smell at night in the darkness and can locate the person of interest that is hiding. Unfortunately, the dog can be replaced not human life. normally there is a policy that needs to be followed before a dog is even considered to be brought out. each agency may or may not have that in place or the criteria may be different. I recommend going on a ride-along at night with your local agency to see firsthand what they go through. this was a good video but as they show the total dog bite and race of the person bitten my question is what was when they shared it what was the ethnicity primarily in that area? so what's next if the K9 is removed as a tool do they take away the less lethal weapons next then the guns?
I hate that they are considered "pieces of equipment" and are sent into places that cops aren't willing to go in. If u know they have guns or knives u shouldn't send the dog.
Police dogs are officers of the law, should u decide to injure or worse, a K-9 officer, u will face the EXACT same punishment as if it were a human officer. First degree murder, attempted murder, of an officer. Meanwhile if someone kills ur family dog, no body is facing a murder charge, so b outraged about tht if ur going to feel some type of way about anything. Please
Some of these cops are ruthless and they enjoy inflicting pain upon others with no consequences. No human in their right mind will just allow a dog to attack them, I don't care if it's a police dog or not, it's fight or flight mode and police don't seem to understand that because they act like damn soulless robots. I am a dog lover and I don't agree with putting these dogs through all this stress.
K-9 units are very valuable resources to law enforcement, they have been used to locate missing persons as well as dead bodies and have also been used in solving cold cases. It is very unfortunate that this gentleman lost his eye, but dissolving K-9 units is not going to resolve anything.
I'm not a criminal. Don't even have a traffic ticket on my record and yes there's lots of good people concerned about the animal abuse committed by law enforcement in the US every day.
If you don't wanna get bit then don't do crime.
Ikr that's what I was thinking. The guy who lost his eye never would have been bitten in the first place if he didn't run after they found his weed.
You can be charged with a crime for trying to stop an attack dog from mauling you.
Police will use your resistance and an excuse to further harm you. That’s a nightmare
@@nobodyspecial4702 until the dog sees a kid for mauling first.
@@nobodyspecial4702 Looks like someone ignored the part where a black man was mauled by a K9 when he had his hands up. The handler set the dog loose after the man clearly wasn’t resisting.
@@nobodyspecial4702 if you think police never abuse their power you are blind
@@nobodyspecial4702
@@nobodyspecial4702 you are privileged if you think every cop is like that, not saying all cops are bad but if you aren’t in a ghetto area or environment you probably wouldn’t understand. People gotta see it from every perspective from the cops to the people in the communities unfortunately nobody’s perfect and cops are included so no just because someone isn’t resisting doesn’t mean he or she will be treated civilized
When I was young I had a person break into my house at night, he was running from the cops ,broke in thru the window not even 2 seconds a k9 came in thru the window and got between me and the criminal. The dog just kept barking and barking at the guy and the dog just held him there until his handler gave a command and was arrested. My dad asked the officer why the k9 didn't attack. The officer said this dog was trained to bark and hold but if he becomes a threat the dog will attack until the handler calls him off. That dog saved my life
Great story!
Working k9s are so underrated, they are so gentle with kids and know the difference between an active threat and an innocent bystander (with the proper training ofc, I know some police k9s aren’t held to a high standard of training and I definitely think that needs to change)
This is why K-9s are a valuable tool.
The problem with bark and hold is it gives time for people to shoot the dog. This is why many teams are against it.
Get that bullshit out of here 😂 idk why vice draws the most pathetic attention seekers
If I'm being eaten alive I'm going into survival mode, that's pretty human
survival mode against an officer. well... um...
fight or flight
@@regularperson9965Against an animal that is mauling you....
@@SomeKidFromBritainby law that dog is a cop
@@regularperson9965 This guy likes the whole boot in his mouth.
I can usually pull myself to see the other side with Vice. However, I do not agree with the usage of your stats regarding Black, white etc...IF you are committing a crime and you get bit, you were first committing a crime. That sees NO color or race.
Don't blame it on the dogs, the dog handlers. Blame it on the individual that is committing the crime! Period!
Maybe don't run from police
Are they seriously saying now that the dogs are racist? Even with black dog handlers? Jeeze Vice is ridiculous
Seriously though!! I can’t believe I just watched this 😂
Not your experience? Good for you. Lucky lucky
Well if the first gentleman didn't run and just took the ticket he would not have had a problem.
This is what I don’t understand. He probably had a record and got spooked and ran. But what’s still unclear is why the dog was let loose. Gun recovery is not a good reason, especially if was not on his person at the time.
The punishment for running from a traffic stop shouldn't be having half your face mauled off.
So release the hounds? Are you insane? Just took the ticket? So the ticket is not a big deal? So then who cares if he runs away from a ticket if the ticket is not a big deal? Im sure there are real crimes cops need to be attending to
@Emily Trembley That's what I was thinking. If the gun is the threat in their minds and it's in the dang car and not on the suspect, then there doesn't seem to be a reason to involve the dog. Those cops WANTED to sick the dog on him.
@@nurssey if they didn’t search him or pay him down, they might have thought he could have another firearm on him.
There was a police chase awhile back in Cali where the dude ran into a store. When a customer came out he was attacked by the police dog. It was all filmed by the news chopper. The whole time the guy in the chopper was like "that's not the right guy, that dog is biting the wrong guy. This will cost the city"
I’ve seen times where the dog has bitten the police
@@johnnypaul2084 I'd lol...
That is the dog handler's fault not the K-9. The dog handler decides who is friend and who is foe. Not the dog, the dog is not smart enough to know who is good or bad, only the K-9 handler. It proves the point that its human error, the dog will do whatever is commanded.
@@nobuh_ When they release the dog they cant stop it- they dont all have perfect recall, its a complete myth.
@@Greggah You obviously never worked with a dog. They do exactly as you say because you earned their ultimate trust.
When the dog was biting at the trainer's chest area, man my nipples went straight into my rib cage.
of course the guy who's making money training wants to keep it going
Underrated comment
of coarse the criminal who ran from the police is going to say he had his hands up and was not resisting as he hid in a bush were no one could see...and say the police should not have dogs...hell he probably thinks they should not have guns tazers cuffs...hell he probably thinks they should have to catch him with a butterfly net or pillows...
To be fair I agree with what the guy said… dogs are just another tool for a police officer to use it’s up to the officer to use them appropriately.
@@sciencehistoryandentertain734 He was in a tough situation, so show him a little sympathy at least. Anyone would panic if they were in his shoes.
@@sciencehistoryandentertain734 you must be a cop lol and the British cops can go around with out guns and I'm not even saying not to use it for sniffing out purposes but you being a cop you no how some of you guys act just like criminals that get to hide behind the badge and you guys shoot ppl with there hands up but wouldn't send a dog on someone with there hands up oooookk🤣
Teaching a K-9 to attack and maul is literally no different than breeding a fighting dog.
Literally ANY other dog would be put to sleep for the same behavior, regardless of its training.
Pretending as a if a recall command works 100% of the time seems highly illogical and unreliable.
Some of the general public and licensed dog trainers are just as valid as LEOs when it comes to instilling a dog with discipline, and can still fail at fully correcting behavior.
Now, imagine said K-9 is put into practice, within highly intense scenarios, surrounded by officers yelling and issuing commands.
It seems highly cruel to promote an animal to perform in high-stress environments that can potentially cut their life short in more ways than one; which does happen.
I just don’t see how this makes sense to anyone who advocates for this?
These are the same people that claim to love dogs, but have no problem watching them be taught to be vicious?
Don’t even get me started on the historical intentional police use of dogs in AA communities and prior.
The theory of intergenerational trauma also speculates that our history may be the reason why many people of similar descent show an innate fear of them, regardless of the breed.
How about we find an alternative method for operation, rather than using another life-form that we see as family, as collateral.
'No, we didn't train them to replace the toy with a person. It's play time. There's no anger.'
So that was a yes.
Yeah, back to back sentences that perfectly contradicted each other. Hypocrisy at its most immediate and raw form.
@@mattshelton7423hypocrisy is the love language of conservatives.
Yeah right that was a a weird "No, but actually yes!"
I got attacked by a police dog when I was 14. A 14 year old white girl. They killed the dog and the people who trained it didn't get in any trouble. I'm lucky it was a young dog in training because an adult one could have broken my arm.
Could have been any dog. No information why the police came with a dog to you.
@@arnoldwatcher cope
I don't know what your skin color has to do with that but ok
@@pinnkdtd If she had been a black girl, even a 14-year-old one, I doubt they would've seen any urgency in killing the dog.
Where did that happen?
He ran from the police and was injured...what are we supposed to feel bad?!?
its probably not good for the dogs either as they are at constant risk of being severely injured or killed by suspects.
Aw boo hoo poor attack dog gets what’s coming to it
So is every cop.
@@Mastermind1029384756 true because even if the dog dies at least it didn’t get named Daniel
@@phoakes Cops are not unarmed. They have protective gear. They have weapons. They don't tackle suspects with their mouth.
@@Mastermind1029384756 the dog didn't choose the job, and don't have the ability to understand it
Make the cops 💯 liable for the dog like every other dog owner. IMMUNITY FROM ACCOUNTABILITY IS THE PROBLEM!!!!
The Professor made the most sense. It has nothing to do with the dog its the people using the dogs imo.
wrong , the presence of the dog allows the person to get away with , get's a free pass becuase dogs are protected.
I’m just here for the crazy boomer comments. For some reason people that don’t like vice watch vice. Weird.
And they are always the earliest commenters apparently
@@Michael-jq5pf bots gonna bot i guess.
@@pastelpurpledeathbed cause vice is libtard trash and the founders know it.
You can watch a channel and not like everything they put out.
I’ve been reading vice since they were just a magazine. It’s fun to watch them devolve , and they occasionally still put out good content…. And I’m a bot.
Bro you can’t run away from police and expect that they aren’t going to use the dog on you. The fact that they are protesting this is crazy
Why can't you?In most countries, dog bites are considered grievous bodily harm, and Police are not allowed to use grievous bodily harm to subdue non violent criminals.
I completely agree
02:08 What was the reason? He responds that there was no reason.... HE WAS RUNNING AWAY FROM POLICE - that was the reason! Their job is to catch criminals, if someone is running away he is supossed criminal. If he stayed calm as he should have been he would still have his eye. Pretty clear to me.
In the army, they taught us to jam your fingers in the dogs eyes. It’s either, only you get hurt or both you and the dog gets hurt.
Congrats, if you didn't do a crime, you did now, assaulting an officer!
Can also choke em out like a person...same effect
@@mrmotofy Only if the dogs owner is not around then you can do this cause he/she might attacked you, while you’re on the dogs neck. Btw YT now just blanket blocked comments for no reasons. I don’t think anyone can see your reply.
K9 dogs 😂😂😂don’t give hormons too dogs
Belgium have the best trainers and the best dogs stay in Belgium
And my dogs are trained like a machine
And dogs have a not good training,their wapens
Some people may not have this dogs....
@@WingWingHerro TH-cam is such a failure. People don’t want censorship, I’ve never heard of a blanket block.😂 I’d bet they did that to some of my comments
I feel bad for the dogs.
@@mutemaids bro said if they bite you bite them back
Liar
what else must the dogs do?sit at home and bored.
@@Durbanewsdrugs They could be normal pets that’s a silly question
And the victims of people controlled dog abuse aka K-9 units. K-9 units are no different than dog fighting rings IMO.
It's funny how the police will send a dog in where it's too dangerous for a man...
Yet they'll kill you if you even so much as breathe wrong on the dog.
You are worth less than a dog, to them...
K-9 units are considered police officers you clown
Well, yeah? Violent criminals are worth less than animals, they're hardly even people. You shouldn't trouble yourself by being concerned with their wellbeing.
@@cicolas_nage If they're violent and resist arrest, sure. If not there's no need, I think that's pretty obvious.
If someone broke into your house they would be worth far, far less to you than your dog.
Don’t run from the police and you won’t get bitten!!
exactly literally common sense
@@noyerbua9243 except if you watched the video tard one of the k9 OFFICERS said himself other k9 police, that he worked with, use it to victimize people for fun/racism
Should criminals stop committing crimes? Make a video on that
It should be legal to punch or kill a police dog that is attacking you.
How silly of you 😆🤣😂 and just how do you think these K9's are trained? Go watch some Shield K9 videos 😂🤣😆 these are dogs... do dogs run whimpering when they get into dog fights? OMDOG!!! rotflmao
@@reneehouser2925 Sticking your thumb as hard as you can beside the eye and into its eye socket works every time.
@@Guranga93 I guess you missed the video of the criminal swimming across a river that stabbed the K9 in the head seven times & God bless that dog he kept going! Check out SheildK9's channel for more. Very specific temperaments are selected for K9 training. Famous quote-"I never saw a wild thing take pity on itself" I guess you've never had to track a deer? Or a bear? I've tracked blood trails very far. I've had to dispatch bears and deer that have been hit by cars. Animals are alot tougher than humans... Ever seen a dog fight? 🤔 Poke out the eye of a K9 officer and see where that lands ya 😆🤣😂 they bite harder when they experience pain so do your homework. You never know who you're talking to in the comments 🧐
@@reneehouser2925 I watched the video and the stabbing had the expected effect, the dog let go of him. It works. It swam around didnt know what to do. I have yet to see a dog (or any animal) that won't hesitate when its eye is being gouged out.
YoU nEveR kNow wHo yoU'rE TaLkiNg tO In tHe cOmMenTs. CRINGE.
F me, dude is describing sundown towns with a soft border basically, and after that border, you're open to being bit because of your "mistake"
"Shouldn'ta been out after dark" is the excuse if anyone complains
Sundown towns still exist
@@Rocanala Vidor, TX for example
*Quit running. If the police have to come get you, then it's not going to end well for you.*
As cute and fluffy as dogs are, having a dog chase and take down a dangerous suspect is more safe to the humans in question. I’d rather a dog die than a human being.
No.
You guys are really going to make this a sob story? Don't run from police if you don't want to get chased by police dogs...
Thank you!!! Someone finally said it
8:55 This guy has a very strange definition of "deescalating"
It's de-escalation indeed. The problem is you dont know ghe definition, because you dont understand use of force law.
@@handled99 do educate me then. If a cop points their gun at you to get you to comply, is that a "de-escalation"?
@@HopeF749 My job isn't to educate you. YOUR job is to NOT speak on topics you know nothing about. Why are you talking if you are confused?
Yes that is de escalation, it can be. Its using a lower level of force, when a higher level of force can be justified. So if pointing a gun at you can get you to comply, instead of beating you with a baton, then yes, pointing the gun is de escalation.
@@handled99 lmao no. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/De-escalation#Police_and_corrections
De-escalation means REDUCING the tension in a situation. Adding steps into the use of force ladder is not the same thing.
He's right. The dog's presence can often times prevent situations from escalating because the suspect doesn't want to get bit so they comply vs fighting. The visceral reaction of fear due to the K9 is much more powerful than knowing the cop has a gun, often times. The issue is the handlers using the dogs responsibly and maintaining their training- which is unfortunately up to each department to regulate internally. I say this as a civillian K9 handler. Give working dog radio a listen if you want more information on how these dogs are actually used.
Surprised they didn't talk about cases where these dogs also bite their handlers on the field
Or when their handlers abuse the dogs. I've seen that first hand.
That happened in my town.. Plymouth, Massachusetts. A police k9 attacked his own handler and wouldn't stop, the cop had to shoot and kill his own dog...
@@BicycleFunk I’ll take things that definitely didn’t happen for 200 hundred please 🙄
@@andrews9719 what makes you think that didn’t happen? Videos of handlers abusing their K-9s are disturbingly common
@@andrews9719 I can find you the video, but it would probably be a waste of time? Lmk if you want to see it and I'll hunt it down. It involves a cop punching his dog in the face while it is between his legs just after they get out of their vehicle at the end of a car chase. Or if you don't think that's abuse lmk and I won't waste my time.
This is false information. The first guy who fled from a traffic stop is literally actively resisting. Tense, pushing, pulling, fleeing, all levels of resistance. Just because you fled and laid down in hopes of not getting caught, then that’s on you. And it’s considered a spontaneous bite. We give commands as we track so it’s not a surprise when we find you.
This is just like the gun argument. "Its not the gun that kills people its the owner".
y but look at europe etc, the amount of shot people in the US vs the world is just a tragedy really.
@@JohnSmith-pn2vl Yea, I live in Toronto Canada - we have a bit of gun violence but nothing like it is in the States. Those guys are insane. They are just wiping themselves off the planet. They need to make it harder for people to get guns. And the argument that guns will protect them is ridiculous. With that logic everyone will have a gun and everyone will be shooting - therefore more gun violence. Look at Singapore, Japan, China, and South Korea - 0.01 to 0.02 per 100,000 people. You think people are shooting up schools there? I mean their goverment is kinda fucked up but for gun violence stats it goes to show how much it works when people just can't buy guns.
@@JohnSmith-pn2vlWhich group commits over 55% of all homicides and is only 13% of the US population?
Why is it never addressed and nothing ever changes?
It's like the richest 1% want us to stay deeply divided?
Guns are inanimate objects. Dogs can decide to attack and even kill people with no human intervention necessary. They aren't remotely comparable.
So the gun should be banished forever since it was the gun that killed the person and the human being who used the gun should walk freely right? Got it. 👍
If somebody shoots a police dog the dog is considered an actual cop and you will do a long time in prison Soooo if the dog attacks me while I'm not resisting and it's using excessive force you should be able to sue the damn department just as equally right 🤔
Yes, you actually can and people have and won. There's literally no downside to having k_9's unless you're a criminal.
Having you face mauled off is considered necessary force. Departments have repeated investigated themselves and found it acceptable to have a guy's throat ripped out over stealing a beer.
@@nobodyspecial4702 True
@@mf-- Jesus man lol over a beer??
@@mf-- Wasn't that long ago that in some part of the world thieves had body parts chopped off. They had less theft. Maybe figure out why.
3:05 when you have cops who get happy over people getting hurt and seriously injured you know the system needs to be revamped top to bottom
It’s called dark humor, and it’s unfortunately normal. From Law enforcement, to medical personnel to those in the military, etc. the vast amounts of horrific things you endure in those jobs causes you to be that way. Maybe if people would change their behavior like simply obeying simple rules then maybe less people would get into trouble and get hurt and or killed.
@@Vet0714 I see you little racist white boy...
broo that black guy ran from the cops the did there job and got him so it was his fault the dog bite his dumb ass BC HE RAN...no matter if hes black or not HE RAN
@@Vet0714 Police are under constant stress but can't be allowed to take that stress out on other people, calming down a situation should be their priority not yelling, screaming, and making jokes at people getting hurt, cops are embarrassingly bad at de-escalation and alot come off as rude, demanding and forceful and this is the exact reason alot of people are scared of the police and dislike them because a simple situation can turn crazy just because a cops having a bad day
@@Vet0714 They can endure whatever the hell they want, no officer or citizen is above the law, and those pretending to be should be punished to the maximum extent of the law.
im sorry but the guy who lost his eye ran away if he had stayed he would have been fine this happens in alot of cases where they run and get hurt because of it or they end up with more time in prison because of it.
Thank you finally some one understand the situation if he would have never left then he wouldn’t get hurt!! People right away want to criticize cops ok the department but no one take about what cops have to go through on a daily basis I don’t see any one protesting telling people that they have to respect cops to get respect back.
personally I don't think he should loose half of his eyesight for possession of marijuana
@@samc6194 he wouldnt have if he didnt run
@@samc6194 that’s true but he didn’t loose it because of possession he lost it because he ran from the police. The problem we’re facing is that’s the public doesn’t respect cops because of certain events that have happened and cops are on super alert and might act more intense because there scared some one might try to hurt them. For example about 2 weeks ago I got pulled over and the officer said it was because I didn’t move to the other lane while they had had another car stopped he was a lil nasty so I waited for him to finish and then I explained to him that he saw me yield when I passed them and I ah knowledge that they were there and he had no reason to get nasty and that was it we both understood each other. I think that’s what we as the public need to do record and show them respect And if we feel that we were mistreated for any reason file a complaint and if nothing is done then yes we should protest peacefully but if we don’t respect them they won’t respect us!
!!show respect to get respect!!!
Or he would have been mauled anyway despite not resisting.
7:20 bro pulled up on his ass😂
damn I didn't expect r/ACAB to flood the comments with poor and irrational excuses to get rid of K-9 units
What do you expect these are the same people that want to defund the police.
Jesus I cant imagine the absolute horror of having half my face in the powerful jaws of that killing machine. Ouchie.
You have to think positive. Think of it as a doggie kiss 😁
Don't do the crime
They are not train to bite you face🤦🤦
Better than getting shot and killed tbh
@@mr.b3168 Quite honestly, the only crime mentioned is weed. I think they need to get away from criminalizing weed, since everybody uses it (except me).
You're not moving , you're not resisting anymore ..... Thanks to that K9 Officer. Job well done officer. Next time don't do wrong and don't try to run after the matter.
yes, using attack dogs is simply a terror weapon done to harass and brutalize the population while not having the officer himself be responsible and instead an animal, who does not have the same legal obligations as a human, can brutalize you without seeing justice. it's sickening.
Is it possible that if Tyrell didn’t run from the police that they wouldn’t have used the dogs on him?…🧐
That's what I said
Tht is the damn truth lol but nobody is teaching their kid to behave and respect authority. It's all "act a fool until ur free"
Anyone who knows anything about police works knows that k9 units are essential. This video, at best, showed that k9 usage needs to be monitored, but not that it should be taken away from departments.
I think they are an extremely valuable tool as rescue and explosives dogs but for drug K-9s it seems like the cops just signal whatever they want. I had a dog "alert" on my car here in NJ and they tore apart my car only to find nothing. So clearly something fishy was going on.
Anyone who knows anything about police knows that K-9s are 100% unnecessary.
@@alexanderorr2528 I think searches initiated by dog hits should be evaluated. If the results of that evaluation show that dog initiated searches are mostly false positives, then their use should be monitored or restricted. The only problem I can think of when saying that is false positives could result from prior drug use in the vehicle. For example, a pot smoker who smoked pot in his car last night, but wasn’t transporting any during the time of the stop.
@@alexanderorr2528
What @Andrew said.
Dog's sense of smell is literally thousands of times more sensitive than humans. They can even smell bodies under water.
So if it wasn't you then someone you had in your car triggered the dog.
You CAN request a second dog to scan the car.
You can tell the officer that you think the dog is wrong and you would like a 2nd dog to check because you are 1,000% sure there is nothing in the car or on your person.
The amount of criminal sympathizing in these comments is stomach turning. Hopefully one of those criminals that you're so against a dog taking down doesn't show up at your back door one night.
He knows the use of the dogs can't be defended so he runs away from trying to.
I don't understand? do you value a dogs life the same as a humans or more than. Dogs don't act alone when serving they are taught, improper conduct lies with the officer.
There's many uses for K9's that exist outside of catching criminals for police, just because your IQ can't see that a vice video is biased in its own right depending on who they interview and the questions they ask.
@@FierceZs1 What a stupid thing to say, I mean are you even old enough to have a TH-cam account? 😂😂🤣
That’s like saying “Oh yea dogs can hunt incase you didn’t know” 💀
@@FierceZs1 That's the point right there. You're saying, 'uses for k9s'. They are animals, they are sentient beings with their own emotions. They're not our slaves to do with as we please. And before commenting on people's 'IQs' I suggest you take a look at your use of punctuation and grammar. If you want to get into the ethics and morality of it all then feel free but anyone with half a braincell can see you don't have much going on up there. When you remove yourself from your mother's breast and grow up a bit perhaps you'll work on attacking the argument itself rather than straw-manning it and trying to correlate things that don't matter.
D0gs shouldn't exist, at all, on Earth.
And if you defend yourself against these attacking dogs you can be charged?! That's crazy.
If person not committing crimes and running & resisting usually no problems.
19 hours and over 2k comments. Seems like everyone has been harrassed by a k-9 unit at some point or another. like when they make you stand outside in the cold with a baby in your arms in winter while they let the dog run around your car.
How is using a "beast" to attack a human not considered cruel and unusual punishment?
Dogs are amazing animals and can do great work in things like search and rescue, explosive detection, and medical alerting, but I fully agree with the professor that training our oldest companions to attack us is cruel to the dogs and people and flat out wrong.
Nope they love doing there job biting shitbag criminals
so youre valuing the life of a human over an animal, and that is kinda disgusting. you dont seem to understand the fact that the dogs attacking criminals prevents the officer getting close and being injured as well as keeps the criminal from receiving a lead injection. but hey if you truly believe that dogs have no business in this line of work, please join the police and volunteer to be the 1st person in to a room with an armed suspect, that way another human doesnt have to risk their life, and so you can show everyone else just how its done; and hopefully...ya know...the world will have fewer people spouting nonsense afterwards
@@skylercook1812 Uh, yes human lives do matter more than an animals. Tf you on Karen?
@@skylercook1812 What a stupid response to such a reasonable comment haha #bootlicker #probablyaCop
Dogs have been used to protect humans for as long as we have coexisted.. it is why we have alot of breeds we have today. It had a purpose then and it has a purpose today. What happened to that guys eye is horrible, no question. But the arguments being made here are nonsensical if you look at why dogs are used for protection. Should this same logic be applied to livestock guardians? Police dogs are a form of protection dog, trained to be aggressive with certain suspects just like police are..it makes sense and saves human lives. A belt has been used as a tool of abuse as well, does that mean we shouldn't make belts anymore?
Hear me out. Maybe don’t have illegal drugs and guns in your car and then run from the police and then you’ll still have your eye….
When I first watched this video there were a lot of comments pushing against the video's message.
But suddenly, the comments seem to be gone now and it's not like they vanished into thin air.
that's youtube for ya, blanket banning one side of the poltical spectrum.
It's not the tools that are the issue, it's the person using those tools.
Thank you.
🙌🙌🙌 THIS!
So this!
A highly skilled chef is praised for his abilities.
Jeffrey Dahmer on the other hand... 🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️
I agree
We definitely dont need them for attacking people. A lot of times it's just sending the dog to its death.
But it could save a human life in the process.
Dogs have saved many people time and time again, and they've caught many criminals. It is what it is. People who cry about animals are the same ones that eat meat.
Dogs shouldn't be used for this, they are companions.
I wondered why Vice never ask the suspect why they run or why they would resist? oh right, it doesn't fit the agenda.
Let's shut down police force.
Because that's not relevant to the story, the story is about excessive force used by K9 units not the crimes done by the victims.
@@terraisbad3837Opffff Shutt da fooouk uppp.....kids.Go play with Yi gi yo cards
The crime doesn't fit the punishment. All you are implying, is that all Black people, have no rights. If we make a mistake, that puts us in contact with the cops, we no longer have any human rights. Again.. You ARE implying that Black people are NOT innocent, until proven guilty. However, you are also implying, that I have no right to a public trial, by an impartial jury of my peers, or even a judge.
The police have collectively decided, that THEY will enforce, “The Speedy Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment” They believe, that this will allow them to be the judge, jury and executioner, when they interact with the public. They feel like this is the loop hole, and you only reinforce that belief, when you make statements like this.
The worse part? The whites seem to have no self-preservation, and act as though that are not affected by this too! Whenever Black people talk about police violence, the whites yell at us, “It happens to everyone not just the blacks”, and, “Why don’t you talk about black on black crime.” They also love to yell out, “Why don’t you talk about police crime, when it happens to white people!” But we do. Yet the only comments I will then see from the whites, are basically saying we’re being disrespectful of the hard work the cops do 🤢 When all we are doing, is complaining about police violence against us ALL. 🤮
But if at that moment, we happen to only be talking about how policing affects Black folks? Well, then we are race baiting.
So I have a question for the whites. Why are the higher-caste whites, so silent about state violence, on poor white folks? Why are there not more whites worried about the drugs in their neighborhoods. Or why are they only worried about drugs in their neighborhoods, now? Also, why do whites insist on focusing on marijuana? Why are the whites not demanding free mental healthcare for their youth? You know, so that they’re not unaliving themselves, or taking their guns into schools and businesses and shooting up everyone. Or terrorizing their own family!
Why do Black people have to keep telling the whites, that this is not normal?! Why are the whites so willing to get so little from their government, while paying for it with their lives? Is it just to hurt Black people, the people apart of the LGBTQI+ community, or anyone whose views oppose theirs?
Someone please explain this to me?
The whites need to sit with that, unpack it, and hopefully grow. But I suppose most whites would call that being “woke”, or “forced learning of CRT”. Yes keep willfully ignoring the generational trauma, that the whites inflict on their own kids. “The blacks running from the dogs are the TEAL problem, plaguing America.” 🙄
They are destroying their own community from within, and at this point I’m like, if they die, they die 🤷🏾♀️
The last question is for my fellow Black people. Why do we keep advocating for the freedom, of a group of people, who has lost the last little bit, of their remaining common sense? They do not want our help. Some us still need to learn, that No means No. 🤷🏾♀️
In this topic, you have to remove whatever biases you have towards either side and just think logically. Sometimes it’s better to listen to understand than to listen just to deflect and be combative due to your own personal biases
Resisting is it’s own topic itself. There are thousands of police body cams, dash cams, video surveillances across the internet that show people be beaten,shot, and bitten by police dogs for NOT resisting.
Hypothetically speaking, if there were to be a NON VIOLENT drug dealer/user or non violent criminal in general who was trying to resist and flee does that warrant being mauled by a dog? Does that warrant being shot?
There are different protocols depending on what crime the person did and how they behave afterwards.
If you have a robber or mass shooter who just committed murder and they resist and run, they are an immediate threat and should be shot down by police.
These every day scenarios always consist of policeman sicking dogs on people who have drugs stashed in their property.
What’s the point of having a judge and courts if we will just allow law enforcement to make their own judgments and punishments based on their biases?
No they should not
When was the last time you saw a cop considering restraint?
I play wrestle with my Sheppard and he never ever bites me with that much anger or malice. That wasnt toy training, that was training to injure.
There will be an increase in dog unemployment if they shut it down which will increase dog homelessness...
Then, the unemployed homeless dog will probably start using drugs and committing crimes...
Real
@@boots8562 Then, lose an eye to an attack-gimp and start suing police stations...
Lawsuit. Its cruel and unusual punishment at its finest. No one should lose an eye over a traffic stop and weed. I would sue millions of dollars or ask to put the dog down. LE shouldn’t use a k9 as a weapon, but a tool to sniff drugs or search and rescue.
Ask for both. Both are warranted. Destroy the weapon, and compensate for obvious damages
It's hilarious how much of a clown you have to be to take these videos that seriously. The rate of which that would even happen is so low to even justify your ignorance.
The motherf*cker ran.
@@cicolas_nage and right there is the issue you can’t reason with the dog can’t park in with the dog you can’t surrender to a dog, so it should not be used as a weapon. I have no issue with using dogs to find people or bodies, but to use them in this way is disgusting and grotesque as well as any person trying to justify it. It’s the textbook definition of inhumane.
Maybe one day, young black men will learn that running from police, & resisting arrest generally doesn't end well.
I feel like another thing to consider is the dog was told a command and it executed. If it weren’t for the officer’s command and release, that could have possibly prevented all of this. I don’t see it being the dog at fault but the officer in charge of the dog 🤷♂️ dogs have helped us humans for a long long time! ❤🐶
I agree. They train these dogs to be weapons of destruction and that's what they're going to do. They are animals, so if that's a good idea I just don't know. They seem to be very inaccurate when it comes to free air sniffs which allows a violation of our right to deny a search :(
Combat police dogs should not be used. Sniffing for bombs is one thing, training an animal to attack and hurt people is completely different. There are still many abusive training methods used on K9 units, and these dogs are put in danger. Let the humans who CHOSE to be in danger take care of it. Using a dog is cowardly and cruel. They will get just as much enjoyment doing any other job, and there is no reason to be training animals for violence. If you genuinely do care about the well-being of these dogs, you would not support it. But no, these dogs are to you what they are to the police department. Tools. Human aids. Not deserving of rights unless they serve YOU a purpose. Dogs are dogs first, companions second. They have just as much jurisdiction as you or I to be here. If you value their usefulness for us before their comfort and happiness I don't know what to say man, you are part of the issue.
The title should read “should the K-9 unit shut down the police department”
DEFINITELY!
I HAVE FRIENDS IN THE NYPD, AND I ALWAYS TELL THEM THAT DOGS SHOULD NOT BE USED IN LAW ENFORCEMENT! THE MAN IS CORRECT, WHEN A DOG IS ON SCENE, THE PIGS MAKE SURE THAT THE DOG BITES THE VICTIM!
Lmao don’t be a criminal and you have no issues
*black
I've seen more bad then good when using K9s! Just last year seen a live chase and bit a bystander coming out the liquor store instead of the real suspect in LA!
There's cases where they raided the wrong home and there was question as to if they said warrant and when the man defended his family, he got off free and he had to shoot. Now I ask you, if an officer bit you... [are you cool with it?]
wtf are you trying to say.
I think dogs MUST GO from police work.
The cops are too irresponsible to have them as a tool.
They should deploy thousands more. Just in Chicago and New York. 🐕🦺
Maybe don't run? Or don't commit crimes? 😂
True why did he run?
@@katierose1893 It was an art exhibition of wokeism.
If vice wasn’t so bad at reporting they would’ve included footage of K9s biting innocent civilians. It’s happened plenty of times, as well as K9s turning on and fatally mauling their partners/trainers.
On the note, that police does not hold professionalism in the event when they have to use a canine yes, they need to shut this down
I think that a lot of people are forgetting that dogs are one of the very few options that can be recalled before it inflicts harm.
Lol good luck. Once they get the attack command, They won't stop until physically dragged off.
I think you forget this is a LIVING BREATHING ANIMAL. It's not a machine and should not be expected to act like one
Yes. Obviously yes, and it's been an obvious "yes" for almost a decade at this point. Researchers have assessed the error rate of sniffing dogs many times and the results are clear: sniffing dogs are no better than chance at detecting/distinguishing controlled substances. As for using them to attack people, I don't know why this country allows police to violate state animal welfare laws. Police K9 training programs have been repeatedly exposed for using training techniques that would be illegal under animal welfare statutes in most states, and if a dog is being used as a weapon against a dangerous person then the police are just as responsible as the dangerous person for wounding/killing that dog. This isn't even touching the base unethical nature of state authorities using dogs to detain/attack humans in general, which can result in permanent disability or death (to a person who has not even been convicted of a crime yet or given any form of due process) not to mention the unnecessary amount of pain inflicted onto people who are attacked by these dogs as police K9 officers rarely have sufficient strength/control to prevent people from being bitten multiple times before the dog is successfully pulled away. They can't even fully prevent themselves from being bitten by the dog they are supposed to control! And yes, people have died from police dog bites just as people have died from non-police dog bites, because while the bite is virtually non-fatal the secondary effects like sepsis are very much fatal if not detected and treated immediately.
buddy runs from the police and sooks when the dog get his ahh, play stupid games win stupid prizes.
Don’t comitt crimes. Don’t run from LE. Don’t resist and these lovely pooches won’t get you. There is no racial “disparity”. Numbers don’t lie. You comitt more crimes than others, you get bitten more often.
Without even watching it, the answer is yes.
Ok Karen
No
@@frgpilot you OK buddy?
K9's are cruel to both the actual dogs and the suspects the dogs are used on.
don't do crime. Easy!
Before I even start to watch my answer is yes.
Typical liberal. Agrees with whatever the media shoves in their face.
A man loses his eye because he had a substance that is legal in about 20 states. The cops: “You shouldn’t have run”
No dumbass you shouldn't have oh but I'm guessing you have prior and being caught smoking a blunt with your home fries at the basket ball courts is usually not OK! You said 20 states and not all of them. If you don't like that move to a state that it is legal. Or come to Canada where it's legal federal
Because that's true , he shouldn't have run , running only makes it worse for you . It doesn't matter if it's legal in other parts of the country , if it's illegal there , it's illegal , you can't run and say " it's legal in x states tho "
as stated in the video the dog was brought out because of the firearm found in the vehicle as well. meaning they don't know if he is still armed with another firearm and with a dog he/she has a better sense of smell at night in the darkness and can locate the person of interest that is hiding. Unfortunately, the dog can be replaced not human life. normally there is a policy that needs to be followed before a dog is even considered to be brought out. each agency may or may not have that in place or the criteria may be different. I recommend going on a ride-along at night with your local agency to see firsthand what they go through. this was a good video but as they show the total dog bite and race of the person bitten my question is what was when they shared it what was the ethnicity primarily in that area? so what's next if the K9 is removed as a tool do they take away the less lethal weapons next then the guns?
Yeah clown, if it wasn't a big deal then why run?
Leave it to the fraternal order of police to screw up K-9 units.
Most handlers cant control their dogs, most cant even get their dog to do a simple release command.
I kinda feel bad but why run from the police?
3:40 he looks like that deputy from Reno 911 😆
I hate that they are considered "pieces of equipment" and are sent into places that cops aren't willing to go in. If u know they have guns or knives u shouldn't send the dog.
You eat animals.
That's literally the entire point of police dogs, to save human lives.
Robodog will replace k9
They're considered a police officer though...
@@NotSethyboy yes I know but they are also considered equipment. I wouldnt send a dog into a situations I wouldnt go myself in.
THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO NOT GETTING BIT BY A DOG:
Don't run.
Police dogs are officers of the law, should u decide to injure or worse, a K-9 officer, u will face the EXACT same punishment as if it were a human officer. First degree murder, attempted murder, of an officer.
Meanwhile if someone kills ur family dog, no body is facing a murder charge, so b outraged about tht if ur going to feel some type of way about anything. Please
Why on earth would they do that?
Oh damn I’m from Gainesville I definitely remember those protests
Some of these cops are ruthless and they enjoy inflicting pain upon others with no consequences. No human in their right mind will just allow a dog to attack them, I don't care if it's a police dog or not, it's fight or flight mode and police don't seem to understand that because they act like damn soulless robots. I am a dog lover and I don't agree with putting these dogs through all this stress.
K-9 units are very valuable resources to law enforcement, they have been used to locate missing persons as well as dead bodies and have also been used in solving cold cases. It is very unfortunate that this gentleman lost his eye, but dissolving K-9 units is not going to resolve anything.
So they should be used for those sorts of purposes only and not used as attacking weapons.
Dogs should not be used as weapons…
I knew a military canine, she was trained to bite humans and was trained to search for weapons. Sweetest dog I ever met
All of a sudden, criminals are concerned about animal rights 😂
ong lmao
I'm not a criminal. Don't even have a traffic ticket on my record and yes there's lots of good people concerned about the animal abuse committed by law enforcement in the US every day.
Vice would ask a dumb question like this. Fleeing from and officer and getting bit = play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
So, a guy with drugs and guns resists arrest and runs from the police, and you feel the police have no right to pursue?
How would you feel if they put a leash on you and said you work for us for free now.
He should at least take advantage of the situation and wear an eye patch
I understand they're usefull for police operations. But i just feel bad for the dogs.
Why? The dogs live for this. This is why they were specifically bred for this job.
@@Bastos9458 Still, doesnt feel like a happy and safe life, does it?
Increase training to a high standard even further I guess. I entirely disagree with removing K-9 units they just need more training