'Man and his Symbols' Carl G Jung Part 7

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 25

  • @frequentflyer8866
    @frequentflyer8866 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you up loader, you're a legend.

  • @funkyboodah
    @funkyboodah 8 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    [1:02:39] The Social Aspect of The Self

    • @danielm978
      @danielm978 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank your for marking the diffferent parts.cheers

  • @fungi42o0
    @fungi42o0 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is a great section.

    • @fungi42o0
      @fungi42o0 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Dimensional awareness

  • @TheSicilyboss
    @TheSicilyboss 8 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    I appreciate that you took the time to upload all this.

  • @funkyboodah
    @funkyboodah 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    the secret of the Bath Badgard (Castle of nonexistence) [58:17]

  • @PdittYify
    @PdittYify 9 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Part 3 The Self: Symbols of Totality 14:12

  • @aarons9809
    @aarons9809 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow

  • @khurmiful
    @khurmiful 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In islam Fatima has no such role

  • @dwcrabtree
    @dwcrabtree 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "In the Transcendent Function" Active Imagination.

  • @johnshirley9995
    @johnshirley9995 ปีที่แล้ว

    Self symbolized by stone 40:00

  • @johnshirley9995
    @johnshirley9995 ปีที่แล้ว

    52:00 mandala and 4 Corners

  • @justroll
    @justroll 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    20:15 211

  • @JetLumin
    @JetLumin ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonderful - so fascinating, and when heard outlined like this - so relatable

  • @johnshirley9995
    @johnshirley9995 ปีที่แล้ว

    The relation to the self..Emptiness of City dwellers 47:51

  • @andress4780
    @andress4780 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    47:52

  • @dwcrabtree
    @dwcrabtree 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    48:00 Amen....

    • @dwcrabtree
      @dwcrabtree 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is Crucial information!

  • @johnmiller7453
    @johnmiller7453 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I've never or very rarely had dreams like any of these. My dreams are much stranger and to me, much more interesting and otherworldly. Maybe it's all those years of psychedelics.
    The only really interesting part of this book with some few rare exceptions is the chapter written by Jung. I have found often that the founder of a system is often the only one that ever really has much skill with it. We must all create our own systems or forever be hacks at someone else's. Also I wonder what Jung would have to say about the work of Ernest Becker? I'm guessing Becker would have been a serious challenge to Jung in some ways and a conformation in others.

    • @coreycox2345
      @coreycox2345 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I find it all illuminating on Jung, but you seem correct, john miller. It is impossible to know what Jung would think of any interpretation of his work without having his comments. It appears that more than a chapter of this was written by Jung. To what parts do you refer that were not?

    • @9Iamthewalrus
      @9Iamthewalrus 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We live in a strange and fragment world that becomes more fragmented every year. Our dreams are still archetypical, but it’s mushed into a cloud of contemporary confusion.

    • @9Iamthewalrus
      @9Iamthewalrus 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@zechariahbryan1568 Similar phenomenonas the "unhallucinogenic acid trip", cartoons and immersive video games have hijacked our visualizations of symbols and structures on our astral headspace. I worked with VR for a bit and can say it interfieres with how you descend normal daydreaming and meditation, its suddenly alot closer to baseline.
      All that means is that weve reached a plateau of common myth structure, which only works as long as the current paradigm sits still. It also doesn't help that though the atomic worship of Jesus weve become singular in our interpretation of the hero, meaning we cannot see a hero detached from everyone else's hero story. In a way it's a good recipe for revolution (remutation), makes me wish Jung listened to Otto Gross a bit more instead of locking him up and plagarising from him.

    • @willissudweeks1050
      @willissudweeks1050 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jung wasn't really creating systems he was observing what was very old and already there. Although he interpreted it in his own words.