This review is even more interesting today, when the choice becomes between a $35K Jag and $75K Porsche. Love the Porsche but not more than two Jags. :)
Ok now do the test again with an AWD F-Type S. :) The 1 sec track time difference should vanish. Add the ceramic brake package on the F-type as well...
F - type over this for sure, yea it doesn't have the best interior but its interior is still a 100K interior and that sound and design is far more eye catching / exotic. Same thing with the new Z06.... The 911 is great but compared to a front engine, RWD, and a SC V8.... the Z06 and F-type just have it. more soul, more sexyness, more noise.
Currently have an '09 C4S cab with tip and for grins & giggles just test drove a 2017 F-Type S and R - OMG, pure muscle, even the V6S. Been a Porsche guy all my life, but the new Jag just blew me away. The low end torque is incredible and it just drips sex appeal. Sure the 911 may be better on the track, but my next car may very well be an F-Type.
I'll take the Jag. It looks so good and looks like a lot of fun. It might beat the Carrera S. The Carrera 4S is all wheel drive compared to Jag's two. All wheel drive will always be more stable in corners.
wins what? Going around a racetrack one whole second faster? wow! Well, I chopped in a 911 Turbo S for the new F-Type 5.0 and tell you what, as great a car as the Porsche is I'd have the Jag any day. The 911 feels ordinary by comparison and having driven both to the south of France and back can say the Jag experience is miles better. How many people spend most of their time on a racetrack!? Jag wins, hands down.
ill take the jag it looks better lol plus i wouldn't race my car lmao its all about the looks when im going to spend that kinda money i could care less about how it performs on the track bc for one id never be caught dead at one and 2 in the real world the average person doesn't give a damn as long as its fast and looks good
Great review, great video. It was obvious to me how much more the reviewer was smiling in the Jag, which indicates WAY more fun to drive, as good as the Porsche might be. I just don't trust the Jag will hold together over time like the Porsche will. Just depends on what you like.
F Type looks prettier, has more torque, costs less (even with the full kit), more luxurious, more comfortable, more fun and is only 1.2 seconds slower than the "precision track car" porsche on a track... tell you what, i think i could live with only being 1.2 sec slower, and make myself feel better by spending the $16,634 price difference on a huge holiday :-p
... oh yes i forgot about that particular point. thanks for reminding me...you know i notice there are a fair few different variants of the 911's are on the market aren't there?...oh and ahh Porsche seems to release a new 911 series quite often don't they .... say ah the F type how many different variants are there on the market? you could count them on one hand i think...oh and it's the successor to the E type right...tell me when was the last E type made...quite a while ago, i think 1974-75. And you know it just seems like Porsche makes a new 911 every time the sun rises... so if we have a good hard look at the elements that contribute to depreciation of a car's value ... I think you can see where i'm going with this... PS. of course as the jaguar is cheaper than the porsche off the show room floor it will ultimately be cheaper than the porsche when you sell it after you've owned it. but i'm sure you've worked that out too. you know common sense.
Aguy F Not to state the obvious here, but I think there exists a strong correlation between any new model line and exclusivity...so your argument is somewhat invalid. I also believe, just because there are a number of Porsche models, it does not detract from there superiority as a vehicle (Each is very different). Taking nothing away from the E-type, I just get this horrible feeling it will end up another XK...Cheap and therefore common...so in actual fact, you will find in the long run Porsche's once again prevail in the categories discussed. When depreciation is concerned, unfortunately Jaguar falls very short of Porsche's reputation and always will...depreciation will be huge factor on the F-type. Sorry. P.S depreciation is non relative to the purchase price, it's a rate.
Aguy F Tyler Durden you should not buy a car acording to the value the car will have when you sell it, you should buy it with your heart, the one that puts the bigger smile in your face is the one that should go home with you. If you like acurate driving and "discretion" probably you are looking after a Porsche. If you are looking for a car to put a smile in your face, and in the face of the rest of the people in the streets, a car that not only is gorgeous but it also sounds like a goddess! then you are totally after the jaguar. I'm a true Porsche Fanboy but Jaguar has earned my heart with this one, I just wish they offered a manual gearbox as an option, plus if i had a Porsche it would be RWD, more challenging = more fun! That being said if this jaguar is properly build, it would not loose its value as previous jaguars. This is the ULTIMATE JAGUAR so expect it to have a great value over time
it's amazing how the shape of the car is basically the same since stone age, they just keep refining the same car to a point close to perfection. the other day i drove a boxster s, my first time on a porsche, and that thing is phenomenal it just sticks to the road like nothing else!
so, the jaguar is better in EVERYTHING whats important for a sporty convertible. fun, sound, look, driving, drifting, comfort. and the porsche is better in... trunk space.. price stability..its a second faster... eeeerrr.. so every 90 year old men will take the porsche and every young rich men with style will take the jaguar.
not true in any way! the porsche is a better drivers car and is more comfortable! that explains why its motor trends best drivers car of the year second time in a row!
Man you're so involving in your comment while you're driving. And what a couple of cars! I have to admit: I'll take the Jag all the way down, a V8 is always a V8!
There was another review, i forget from where, but you can easily find it on youtube, where a 2wd 911 was compared with an F type and the 911 still won.
What bothered me most about the Jag was the relative sloppiness of the chassis during the timed lap. It seems to be more softly-sprung than the 911 and the body was leaning right and left quite a lot in the transitions through the corners. I would say that the Jag really isn't a track car. I'd be interested to see what these folks say about the "real world" performance of it. It may have a more comfortable ride than the 911 as well.
Let's see a rematch with the AWD F-type R. That is a lot more fair comparison and by the way, it looked like the driver had a hell of a lot more fun in the jag.
ewt415 You seem to be missing my point, dear sir. If all that Porsche could offer was the Cayenne Diesel I'm confident they'd postpone the test. That's also what they should've done in this case.
João Soares Your example is terrible. Tell me why they would cancel it if all Porsche had was a Cayenne Diesel. Isn't it because it's an SUV, it rides inches upon inches higher than the F-Type, it weighs significantly more than the F-Type, it has less than half the power, it's performance figures are entirely off from the F-Type, it seats five comfortably, it has a huge trunk, lots of storage space and MORE. In other words, it's a different class of vehicle. In the case of the C4S? The ONLY difference is the 2+2 seating (which all 911s other than GTxs have), and the AWD. You really think they'll turn down the offer because of such a difference? Especially seeing as the Jag has significantly better performance figures, it'd be logical to think that a C4S wouldn't be too far off. Of course, they knew this is still not a completely fair comparison, so they took the liberty to tell you that a C2S is available. And honestly, did you expect the Jag to fare any better against a C2S?
a 991 without 4wd would probably have been a tiny bit faster than the 4s. rear engined cars have great traction and - in most cases - don't even need 4wd, especially on a smooth, dry and relatively warm track.
these cars are more suited for cruising the beautiful winding roads between St. Tropez and Cannes than setting lap times on a circuit, but a good test nevertheless! if money was no object, I would take the Porsche hands down, however, from what i saw there's almost 20k between them. that's a lot of money even for people who have lots of money!
that is not important when a car weighs to much. More weight means more HP and torque. If the porsche weighed as much as the f-type it would easily need more than 600 HP
The 4 wheel drive makes a car slower on dry road conditions. So yes it is a bit biased but it's in the Jaguars favor. It would been a bigger win for the Porsche if it were 2 wheel dry.
I don't understand the 'mood' music, some of the dramatic scene captures or some of the graphical text decisions in this video. Auto Express clearly trying hard with video journalism but in the wrong places.
Porsche have got it sooo right, better looking, faster, superior quality, practical...the list goes on and on! Refinement is the only way to build a winning car.
Timo Zomerman seriously! How often are you gonna take it to the track? How often are you going to look at it? Ill take the jag over the vw beetle any day
Ian Mcdowell Timo Zomerman Sounds better, more fuel efficient, safer, mechanically more reliable (JDPowers) I can keep going...at the end of the day, you'd only buy the Jaguar to impress other people, frankly I'd rather impress myself knowing I've bought the superior machine. If you've never driven a Porsche the word "refinement" will mean nothing to you.
Tyler Durden from my experience on this earth Porsches are usually bought to impress other people or by people who aren't very creative and immediately jump to a corvette or 911 when they want a sports car. I'd buy the jag because its better looking and because it is a jag, it has character. I've driven 911s and boxters and they aren't "refined" if by refined you mean the pure definition of them being improved each year...okay. But grace,space, and pace beat out a porsche any day in my book.
+john marsh GT3 and Turbo the best looking 911:s? Maybe if you're 14 years old and like big wings and air intakes. If you're grown up then a 50th anniversary 911 looks much much more sophisticated and refined. The jag is nice, but time will tell if it's a classic like the 911.
How are you going to say Porsche is better just because Jaguar is owned by an indian company? Porsche 911 C4S Cabrio is about 120,000 starting in comparison to 79,000 in which you can get a F-Type. Jaguar made the F-Type so people can buy a relatively cheap, but powerful sports car. In relation to performance to dollar, the F-Type is superior.
Dear Americans: You say Porsh, I say Por-shay. You say Hun-day, I say Hyoon-die. You say Fee-at, I say Fi-et. You say Nee-saan, I say Nis-saan. And Seat is Say-aht, and Renault is ren-noh :)
I love jag but man they price the f-type too high. I was thinking about getting one when I am with school not anymore. Just because it look sexy and people falling in love with the car doesn't mean over price it.
Would have been nice to tell us where this was done. The Jag looks nice but disappointing interior. Had a 911 C4 once, lovely. Wouldn't buy the jag, especially after Clarkson said it was uncomfortable...
Both great cars still a Porsche 911 is a better race car. Been that way for 50 years. Would like to see a Boxster S fully equiped against a Jaguar S type both in price they are real close mid $80,000 USD. or so.
Porsche looks goofy with that red top actually. Jag is by far more sexy... That being said its hard to debate the Porsche is the better balanced package.
como lo han dicho en otros reviews, NECESITA MENOR PESO, Y POR QUE NO USAR UNA TRANSMISION MANUAL y/o EN OTRO DADO CASO UNA DE DOBLE EMBRAGUE , para poder conpetir verdaderamente contra porsche
what americans are you talking about? american english is usually much more respectful towards the original pronunciations of foreign words than british english, which usually pronounces them as they would be if they were originally english words.
Or you can skip the Porsche, save some money and get a ZR1 or a GT-R. Both are comparable in setup to these 2 cars. And they are arguably faster. Who is making Jaguar's engines now by the way? For that matter who owns them? Tata Motors? Or is that Aston?
![อยู่คนเดียวกับเขา - ส้ม มารี (Zom Marie) [Official MV]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/gq1cWAIQDLg/mqdefault.jpg)
he was smiling with the jag
This review is even more interesting today, when the choice becomes between a $35K Jag and $75K Porsche. Love the Porsche but not more than two Jags. :)
don't care about that lap time, give me the Jag!
car is about fun, not a stop watch
Agreed
Agreed
Wait Porsche don’t steal my ideas
I'd buy the Jaguar.
Great job reviewing! Your facial expression told me which car to buy, even if I had the video on mute. Thanks for the hard work!
After 53 seconds I felt the need to comment how nicely edited this video is, nice job!
Ok now do the test again with an AWD F-Type S. :) The 1 sec track time difference should vanish. Add the ceramic brake package on the F-type as well...
Totally.
F - type over this for sure, yea it doesn't have the best interior but its interior is still a 100K interior and that sound and design is far more eye catching / exotic. Same thing with the new Z06.... The 911 is great but compared to a front engine, RWD, and a SC V8.... the Z06 and F-type just have it. more soul, more sexyness, more noise.
Currently have an '09 C4S cab with tip and for grins & giggles just test drove a 2017 F-Type S and R - OMG, pure muscle, even the V6S. Been a Porsche guy all my life, but the new Jag just blew me away. The low end torque is incredible and it just drips sex appeal. Sure the 911 may be better on the track, but my next car may very well be an F-Type.
Why would you compare the 4wd porsche instead of the much more comparable rwd?
I'll take the Jag. It looks so good and looks like a lot of fun. It might beat the Carrera S. The Carrera 4S is all wheel drive compared to Jag's two. All wheel drive will always be more stable in corners.
wins what? Going around a racetrack one whole second faster? wow! Well, I chopped in a 911 Turbo S for the new F-Type 5.0 and tell you what, as great a car as the Porsche is I'd have the Jag any day. The 911 feels ordinary by comparison and having driven both to the south of France and back can say the Jag experience is miles better. How many people spend most of their time on a racetrack!? Jag wins, hands down.
good video, good presenter, good editing and music! expected results!
the V6S F-Type is the best one in my opinion, the engine just suits the car better
Porsche for me, better drivers car, more space, more practical...there is no question for me here...
ill take the jag it looks better lol plus i wouldn't race my car lmao its all about the looks when im going to spend that kinda money i could care less about how it performs on the track bc for one id never be caught dead at one and 2 in the real world the average person doesn't give a damn as long as its fast and looks good
Great review, great video. It was obvious to me how much more the reviewer was smiling in the Jag, which indicates WAY more fun to drive, as good as the Porsche might be. I just don't trust the Jag will hold together over time like the Porsche will. Just depends on what you like.
Wrong 😊
Well done India straight into the Gt market with a bang. Porsche still top of the tree with a car that should not work but does. Great review.
F Type looks prettier, has more torque, costs less (even with the full kit), more luxurious, more comfortable, more fun and is only 1.2 seconds slower than the "precision track car" porsche on a track... tell you what, i think i could live with only being 1.2 sec slower, and make myself feel better by spending the $16,634 price difference on a huge holiday :-p
...but then realise your broke when you come to sell it, because its depreciated three times faster than the Porsche.
... oh yes i forgot about that particular point. thanks for reminding me...you know i notice there are a fair few different variants of the 911's are on the market aren't there?...oh and ahh Porsche seems to release a new 911 series quite often don't they .... say ah the F type how many different variants are there on the market? you could count them on one hand i think...oh and it's the successor to the E type right...tell me when was the last E type made...quite a while ago, i think 1974-75. And you know it just seems like Porsche makes a new 911 every time the sun rises... so if we have a good hard look at the elements that contribute to depreciation of a car's value ... I think you can see where i'm going with this...
PS. of course as the jaguar is cheaper than the porsche off the show room floor it will ultimately be cheaper than the porsche when you sell it after you've owned it. but i'm sure you've worked that out too. you know common sense.
Aguy F Not to state the obvious here, but I think there exists a strong correlation between any new model line and exclusivity...so your argument is somewhat invalid. I also believe, just because there are a number of Porsche models, it does not detract from there superiority as a vehicle (Each is very different). Taking nothing away from the E-type, I just get this horrible feeling it will end up another XK...Cheap and therefore common...so in actual fact, you will find in the long run Porsche's once again prevail in the categories discussed. When depreciation is concerned, unfortunately Jaguar falls very short of Porsche's reputation and always will...depreciation will be huge factor on the F-type. Sorry.
P.S depreciation is non relative to the purchase price, it's a rate.
Aguy F
Tyler Durden
you should not buy a car acording to the value the car will have when you sell it, you should buy it with your heart, the one that puts the bigger smile in your face is the one that should go home with you.
If you like acurate driving and "discretion" probably you are looking after a Porsche.
If you are looking for a car to put a smile in your face, and in the face of the rest of the people in the streets, a car that not only is gorgeous but it also sounds like a goddess! then you are totally after the jaguar.
I'm a true Porsche Fanboy but Jaguar has earned my heart with this one, I just wish they offered a manual gearbox as an option, plus if i had a Porsche it would be RWD, more challenging = more fun!
That being said if this jaguar is properly build, it would not loose its value as previous jaguars. This is the ULTIMATE JAGUAR so expect it to have a great value over time
setoain20 Everyone winsss!!! WELL said :D
I liked how they stop the clock b4 the 911 crossed the finish line
Interestingly, the Cayman S was faster than both of them in his Cayman vs Alpha Romeo video.
Is it just me, or does he sit insanely close to the wheel?
I think it would have been even closer if he used the 2wd porsche.
in the end..Porsche always wins even with 95 less hp!!!!!!
it's amazing how the shape of the car is basically the same since stone age, they just keep refining the same car to a point close to perfection. the other day i drove a boxster s, my first time on a porsche, and that thing is phenomenal it just sticks to the road like nothing else!
mou3adh g
Yea, sacrifice fun for 1 second better lap time? No thank you.
Honestly the inside of the jag looks much more luxurious and feels almost a decade younger than the same of old Porsche insides
I love Porsche 911s but I'd personally take the jag here.
so, the jaguar is better in EVERYTHING whats important for a sporty convertible. fun, sound, look, driving, drifting, comfort.
and the porsche is better in... trunk space.. price stability..its a second faster... eeeerrr.. so every 90 year old men will take the porsche and every young rich men with style will take the jaguar.
not true in any way! the porsche is a better drivers car and is more comfortable! that explains why its motor trends best drivers car of the year second time in a row!
Good that you drove both of them and can tell us about this. Thank you so much. ;))
It's so fascinating how the jaguar can be slower than the Porsche while having way more hp and torque.
Come on feel the noise! I want the F-type please.
Man you're so involving in your comment while you're driving.
And what a couple of cars!
I have to admit: I'll take the Jag all the way down, a V8 is always a V8!
I like this reviewer. He's got a lot of good stuff to say in describing the cars, so I wish he'd talk just a tad more slowly.
i believe he said they couldn't get their hands on the c2. However, i don't believe it would have been much different if they used the c2.
As much as i love the F -type jag... i'll have the 911 @ the end of the day...
There was another review, i forget from where, but you can easily find it on youtube, where a 2wd 911 was compared with an F type and the 911 still won.
Jag big time!! Something new
What bothered me most about the Jag was the relative sloppiness of the chassis during the timed lap. It seems to be more softly-sprung than the 911 and the body was leaning right and left quite a lot in the transitions through the corners. I would say that the Jag really isn't a track car. I'd be interested to see what these folks say about the "real world" performance of it. It may have a more comfortable ride than the 911 as well.
Your seating position in the 911 was so wrong. Why were you so close to the steering wheel?
Let's see a rematch with the AWD F-type R. That is a lot more fair comparison and by the way, it looked like the driver had a hell of a lot more fun in the jag.
Because he said they asked for the rwd Porsche, but it was not available.
Why would anyone compare the V8S with the Carrera 4S? RWD vs 4WD...
Did you not hear the part in the beginning where he they tried to get the C2S, but it wasn't available?
ewt415 You seem to be missing my point, dear sir. If all that Porsche could offer was the Cayenne Diesel I'm confident they'd postpone the test. That's also what they should've done in this case.
João Soares Your example is terrible. Tell me why they would cancel it if all Porsche had was a Cayenne Diesel. Isn't it because it's an SUV, it rides inches upon inches higher than the F-Type, it weighs significantly more than the F-Type, it has less than half the power, it's performance figures are entirely off from the F-Type, it seats five comfortably, it has a huge trunk, lots of storage space and MORE. In other words, it's a different class of vehicle. In the case of the C4S? The ONLY difference is the 2+2 seating (which all 911s other than GTxs have), and the AWD. You really think they'll turn down the offer because of such a difference? Especially seeing as the Jag has significantly better performance figures, it'd be logical to think that a C4S wouldn't be too far off. Of course, they knew this is still not a completely fair comparison, so they took the liberty to tell you that a C2S is available.
And honestly, did you expect the Jag to fare any better against a C2S?
Can you lower down the volume of the music and the exhaust notes.
It's rival is the Boxster (S), not the 911 (that would be the XK). Porsche owns Jaguar in both cases. Sorry.
a 991 without 4wd would probably have been a tiny bit faster than the 4s. rear engined cars have great traction and - in most cases - don't even need 4wd, especially on a smooth, dry and relatively warm track.
V6 S would have been quicker in my humble opinion...
these cars are more suited for cruising the beautiful winding roads between St. Tropez and Cannes than setting lap times on a circuit, but a good test nevertheless! if money was no object, I would take the Porsche hands down, however, from what i saw there's almost 20k between them. that's a lot of money even for people who have lots of money!
that is not important when a car weighs to much. More weight means more HP and torque. If the porsche weighed as much as the f-type it would easily need more than 600 HP
If you want to be faster against the stop watch, and pick the 911, you'll pay a lot more than the Jag for it
The Jag's interior is better, given its cheaper as well, I will buy the Jag (given the choice....)
The 4 wheel drive makes a car slower on dry road conditions. So yes it is a bit biased but it's in the Jaguars favor. It would been a bigger win for the Porsche if it were 2 wheel dry.
Not too bad, despite being heavier, not all wheel drive, and no dual-clutch, the Jag only behind 1.2sec.
They are not in US. And I am very sure they won't be in UK if you spec them the same.
I don't understand the 'mood' music, some of the dramatic scene captures or some of the graphical text decisions in this video. Auto Express clearly trying hard with video journalism but in the wrong places.
any sports car company will envy porsche's racing history, that's a fact.
Porsche so much more refined from an engineering perspective but the price is just plain ridiculous, i'd rather go for an f-type v6 s.
Porsche have got it sooo right, better looking, faster, superior quality, practical...the list goes on and on! Refinement is the only way to build a winning car.
Timo Zomerman seriously! How often are you gonna take it to the track?
How often are you going to look at it?
Ill take the jag over the vw beetle any day
Ian Mcdowell
Timo Zomerman
Sounds better, more fuel efficient, safer, mechanically more reliable (JDPowers) I can keep going...at the end of the day, you'd only buy the Jaguar to impress other people, frankly I'd rather impress myself knowing I've bought the superior machine. If you've never driven a Porsche the word "refinement" will mean nothing to you.
The sound of the jag is much better and the interior too, how often will you take your car to a race track?
Tyler Durden from my experience on this earth Porsches are usually bought to impress other people or by people who aren't very creative and immediately jump to a corvette or 911 when they want a sports car.
I'd buy the jag because its better looking and because it is a jag, it has character. I've driven 911s and boxters and they aren't "refined" if by refined you mean the pure definition of them being improved each year...okay. But grace,space, and pace beat out a porsche any day in my book.
+john marsh GT3 and Turbo the best looking 911:s? Maybe if you're 14 years old and like big wings and air intakes. If you're grown up then a 50th anniversary 911 looks much much more sophisticated and refined. The jag is nice, but time will tell if it's a classic like the 911.
Ford did own jaguar once that does not mean the focus and f-type are comparable....
no it's an opinion based on reviews of the car....
How are you going to say Porsche is better just because Jaguar is owned by an indian company?
Porsche 911 C4S Cabrio is about 120,000 starting in comparison to 79,000 in which you can get a F-Type. Jaguar made the F-Type so people can buy a relatively cheap, but powerful sports car. In relation to performance to dollar, the F-Type is superior.
however in the second-hand market. Jaguars do get a bit cheaper and that's when i'll strike
this porsche colour configuration is so so gorgeous
They are in the same price bracket kid, around 40,000GBP
I wish he could do 2 reviews a week! :)
somehow that brake light or what ever that is which is connecting taillights on 911 is bothering me, i think it would look way better without
1/4 mile race please?
Dont forget vitamins, aluminum, and glacier, my favorites, haha
a warm up for the chris harris review coming later today on drive!
Dear Americans:
You say Porsh, I say Por-shay.
You say Hun-day, I say Hyoon-die.
You say Fee-at, I say Fi-et.
You say Nee-saan, I say Nis-saan.
And Seat is Say-aht, and Renault is ren-noh
:)
Oh how naive you are. Jaguar are not 'an Indian company.' They're owned by an Indian company. There's a significant difference.
I like this guy.
Can't wait for Chris Harris' review tomorrow :D
it is not only available in UK……….
"Oh you fighter"..... Jason?
an idiot would say the history of porsche is worth it but honestly the jaguar has a far better history
Because its a better car in every way.
I love jag but man they price the f-type too high. I was thinking about getting one when I am with school not anymore. Just because it look sexy and people falling in love with the car doesn't mean over price it.
Not just the track buddy, the 911 feels better everywhere.
Would have been nice to tell us where this was done. The Jag looks nice but disappointing interior. Had a 911 C4 once, lovely. Wouldn't buy the jag, especially after Clarkson said it was uncomfortable...
Good test.
I heard the 6cyl is faster on the track vs the V8
Both great cars still a Porsche 911 is a better race car. Been that way for 50 years. Would like to see a Boxster S fully equiped against a Jaguar S type both in price they are real close mid $80,000 USD. or so.
I didn't know this man talked?
The Jag is cheaper, faster acceleration, better looking, better interior. Why the hell would you buy the porsche?
class and prestige is still something associated with the jaguar name. something porsche has yet to match
what do you think is a better choice bmw 435i or cayman ?
awd v 2wd....not really a fair context....oh well....to be that close wwith half the traction...
Porsche looks goofy with that red top actually. Jag is by far more sexy... That being said its hard to debate the Porsche is the better balanced package.
Jaguar: an Indian company that makes cars
Porsche: a German company that crafts superb cars
I conclude Porsche is better
como lo han dicho en otros reviews, NECESITA MENOR PESO, Y POR QUE NO USAR UNA TRANSMISION MANUAL y/o EN OTRO DADO CASO UNA DE DOBLE EMBRAGUE , para poder conpetir verdaderamente contra porsche
what americans are you talking about? american english is usually much more respectful towards the original pronunciations of foreign words than british english, which usually pronounces them as they would be if they were originally english words.
The Jag looks nice but what is the point of having a convertible in the UK ? LoL
nice video
Isnt the V6 S lighter and makes the same power #s as the 911. On top of being 20k cheaper.
Well the Porsche "wins" but still he couldn't keep from smiling and laughing in the Jaguar. So I wondwr which one he really liked.
please, we're not the ones willfully mispronouncing words from other languages and naming car companies after them.
Jaguar has always been more associated with prestige than Porsche.
Or you can skip the Porsche, save some money and get a ZR1 or a GT-R. Both are comparable in setup to these 2 cars. And they are arguably faster. Who is making Jaguar's engines now by the way? For that matter who owns them? Tata Motors? Or is that Aston?
Cayman all the way... they are not even in the same price bracket actually. You are probably looking at M3 at Cayman price.