The ancient Hindu roots of Quantum Physics: Archana Raghuram's full talk

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 277

  • @TheFestivalofBharat
    @TheFestivalofBharat  ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Are you aware that we have spent crores of Rupees (hundreds of thousands of dollars) over the past few years to build Citti Media, yet deliver all of our content 100% free of cost ? To support us as we continue to expand, please contribute to Citti Media’s fundraisers generously, on Dharmic Crowd Funding: dharmiccrowdfunding.com/?s=Citti+media 🙏🏼❤🙏🏼
    Partner Links:
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding: dharmiccrowdfunding.com
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding on Twitter: twitter.com/DharmicFunding
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding on Instagram: instagram.com/dharmiccrowdfunding
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding on Facebook: facebook.com/dharmiccrowdfunding
    >> Citti Media on DCF: dharmiccrowdfunding.com/?s=Citti
    Citti Media Links:
    >> To view all Citti Media English playlists, please click here: th-cam.com/users/CittiMediaplaylists
    >> To view all Festival of Bharat playlists, please click here: th-cam.com/users/TheFestivalofBharatplaylists
    >> To subscribe to the Citti Media English TH-cam channel, please click the subscribe button at: th-cam.com/users/CittiMedia
    >> To subscribe to The Festival of Bharat TH-cam channel, please click the subscribe button at: th-cam.com/users/TheFestivalofBharat
    >> Sign up for our newsletter here: www.citti.net
    >> Donate via our website: www.citti.net/donate
    >> Join us on our Telegram group: t.me/cittimedia
    >> Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/CittiMedia
    >> Instagram: instagram.com/cittimedia
    >> Facebook: facebook.com/cittimedia
    >> & Koo: www.kooapp.com/profile/CittiMedia

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      This Archana is another Pseudo-science Propagandist! She is another "graduate" of the RSS University which specialises in Pseudo-Science and converting Mythology in Science. All her arguments are blatantly FALLACIOUS!
      These Right-wing Jokers with twisted brains indulge in a dubious practice called Scientific Foreknowledge! As per their twisted wisdom all things discovered by real Science have their "roots" in ancient India scriptures; and then they go about creating dubious "associations" between real Scientific theories/discoveries with things mentioned in Hindu religious scriptures.
      Mind you, this is totally different from some real scientific knowledge in ancient India.
      And what nonsense is this "consciousness" that Archana is singing? What has that got to do with real scientific theories and inventions? The term "consciousness" is applicable to Spirituality and things related to the Mind - not to Science.
      What most Indians do not know they suffer from deep Inferiority Complex (visa-a-vis the West) and are brainwashed from childhood into fake beliefs of all kinds. They don't even know the definition of Science. They are worshippers of fake knowledge! They brainlessly believe any thing that glorifies Ancient India, Hinduism and Scriptures.
      This explains their laughable habit of creating Pseudo-Science and converting Mythology in Science.

    • @AkshayChaitanya
      @AkshayChaitanya ปีที่แล้ว

      You're doing a great service of mankind. Today landed on this channel. A blessing in disguise. Quantum physics is taught step by step via 9 schools of Indian philosophy. Though discussion starts after someone gets the Nobel prize.

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AkshayChaitanya , what the hell did you say, _"great service to mankind"?_ !!! You are another low IQ Hindu.
      There are NO ancient Hindu roots of Quantum Physics! This Archana lady is another MAD Pseudo-scientist who is irrationally applying “Consciousness” (related to thought-patterns) to Physics (related only to the Material world) by playing with the term “Consciousness”!
      The scientist at 10:20 said: _“A particle has no real existence until it is observed._ "
      But this stupid Pseudo-scientist has misinterpreted what the Scientist said to justify her airy-fairy Vedantic definition of Consciousness, as per which Universe is based on Consciousness. And then she says, this Universe is created by Brahman by simply witnessing it. LOL!
      This is nothing but “playing with words” to create fanciful theories (for delirious Andha Bhakts of Ancient India)!
      Consciousness is related to the state of our Psyche/Mind. Quantum Physics is about researching and discovering things (like in all scientific pursuits).
      You cannot OVERSTRETCH its definition (like this mad women has done) and then say Quantum Physics has its roots in Vedanta! Ridiculous!
      Going by her definition of Consciousness, if we start thinking and dreaming of Aliens, will they start appearing before you? Hell, NO! LOL!

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      Archana Raghuram is a mad woman speaking delirious NONSENSE!
      3:48 _“If you look at Big Bang, it has been fine-tuned for the creation of the Universe. If Big Bang was .0001% more powerful the Universe would not exist._ ”
      6:21 _“Universe exist for the explicit purpose of creating life._ ”
      This woman is simply parading childish assertions out of existing Discoveries (of which she has NO basic understanding of).
      If Universe exists for creation of Life forms, why then aren’t there any life-forms on other Planets? If Big Bang was .0001% more powerful then, probably, another form of Universe would’ve come into existence.
      Then this MAD woman asserts that her 2nd “childish assertion” is same as theory of Karma - which says Universe is for all living beings to EXHAUST their Karma!

    • @toomanydonuts
      @toomanydonuts 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that zit is a whopper

  • @dominicayyanikkatt7463
    @dominicayyanikkatt7463 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    For those interested in Vedanta and Physics,I would recommend Maya in Physics by N C Panda,published by Motilal Banarsidass,Delhi.It is highly scholarly and suited for both specialists and serious beginners.

  • @shivaji856
    @shivaji856 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    People speak stylishly in english accent but donot know the difference between Nobel and Noble...and pronounce Nobel as Noble.

  • @dancingnachos3634
    @dancingnachos3634 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Goosebumps! Thanks

  • @RohanRajadhyaksha
    @RohanRajadhyaksha 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Leaving this link here to dispel the misinformation and half-baked arguments presented by this "researcher":
    th-cam.com/video/2SR10GCXRyw/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared

    • @RohanRajadhyaksha
      @RohanRajadhyaksha 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Another video that follows up on other misrepresentations in this video -
      th-cam.com/video/coKJ3dn65Po/w-d-xo.htmlfeature=shared
      Hope it at least prompts listeners to think more rationally and inquisitively instead of accepting the word salad presented here without question.

  • @ANBhat123
    @ANBhat123 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This is such an important topic which needs to be discussed more in our mainstream culture. Shankarcharya is really the jagadguru and he should be taught more and more in the world .
    As Vivekananda said advaita is the Religion of the future 🙏🏻

  • @ramum9599
    @ramum9599 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Lady researcher opening layman,s eyes is really great !!How Scence and Vedanta are correlating is tremendous idea which laymen do not know until anyone like this Lady explains !!!!🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @_etg
      @_etg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that lady is speaking pseudo science

  • @TheMoonchild1969
    @TheMoonchild1969 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I sincerely doubt ancient Hindus had any clue of Quantum Mechanics at all.🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      MoonChild, this Festival of India channel is a pathetic propagator of Pseudoscience and all kinds of fake thoughts in support of Ancient Indian and Hinduvta!

  • @ArjunSharma-zk4yy
    @ArjunSharma-zk4yy ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Would like to see more videos on ancient India knowledge

  • @ronukken
    @ronukken ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What a nonsense? First of all consciousness is not same as observation. Even if you don't observe, the particle exists. Can you name any genuine physicst say otherwise?

    • @SB-wu6pz
      @SB-wu6pz ปีที่แล้ว

      See Bells Inequality test.Recently noble prize was awarded for people who did the test for 40 long years .

    • @ronukken
      @ronukken ปีที่แล้ว

      @SB I read as follows.
      bell Test - This principle states that if some information is known about a given particle, there is some other information about it that is impossible to know. An example of this is found in observations of the position and the momentum of a given particle. According to the uncertainty principle, a particle's momentum and its position cannot simultaneously be determined with arbitrarily high precision.
      So it says The Particle exist irrespective of its characteristics. It is not a mere consciousness.

    • @sarmakn4838
      @sarmakn4838 ปีที่แล้ว

      An inspiring speech. Expecting more such talks on science

    • @satyaprakashsingh2422
      @satyaprakashsingh2422 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Bhai tu delayed choice quantum eraser padh , phir tujhe ye pataa chalega ki future impacts the past .

    • @satyaprakashsingh2422
      @satyaprakashsingh2422 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Aur is se ye pataa chaltaa hai ki hamaare consciousness ki existence ki wajah se hi universe banaa.
      May be 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @valerianpereira1259
    @valerianpereira1259 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quantum physics:
    From HINDU Roots: Vedanta:
    Why not make it most operational:
    most applicable
    Practical
    anad used intensely in every field and walk or stream of life.
    Dominta ein this area.
    while the Chinese are.. at this moment.
    Quantum Mathematics
    all from VEDAS?
    WAKE UP: SPECIALISE
    USE IT TO BE THE MOST PRACTICAL ..

  • @gokuls9929
    @gokuls9929 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am more concerned looking at the comments section than at the video!

  • @samwell707
    @samwell707 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The founding fathers were inspired after reading the Upanishads to search for quantum physics

  • @Hupplang77777
    @Hupplang77777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What a rubbish talk just focus to promote to vadenta showing mental created semilarities which doesn't make sense when what does counciousness mean in Vadenta.

  • @antonychacko129
    @antonychacko129 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What that madam is speaking ,distorting all the great achievements of science

  • @lawrencearulanandam2032
    @lawrencearulanandam2032 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    are you filing the gaps in science with religion which impacts on the science bringing into alien prejudicial matters to science please be kind to science and avoid distortion.

  • @CypressVintage
    @CypressVintage ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sad part about this...Archana questions the validity of physics to propose God, yet uses physical terms and conditions 0.0001% etc to to say universe was fine tuned for life! Why would a conscious superbeing that wishes an universe into existence worry about turning? So, if it was fine tuned for life, why don't we see life everywhere? Either way, Archana failed in the first three minutes. Sad that she carries any credibility at all.

  • @eternalthoughts-wu5lo
    @eternalthoughts-wu5lo ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have seen Archana jis channel videos ...very good channel.I recommend it strongly to all youth

  • @robbinlittle
    @robbinlittle ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting and very heavy... May be a prelude session to prepare for this podcast would help.

  • @rajendrannairk.v.5866
    @rajendrannairk.v.5866 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Archana Raghuram is obviously an intelligent and smart woman who is A gift to our Nation. She must be given more responsibility....

    • @ravinayar4314
      @ravinayar4314 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fixed..interesting choice of words

    • @rajendrannairk.v.5866
      @rajendrannairk.v.5866 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gan Subram if your family belongs to that..

    • @anantha1201
      @anantha1201 ปีที่แล้ว

      No doubt, the anchor seems to be as dumb as a donkey and so is her voice and choice of words like incredible and all. She’s unable to articulate properly even!

  • @arnabdasphysics
    @arnabdasphysics ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please stop confusing peoplebusing science. Most people doesn't unfortunately have the right science training, neither a deep understanding of Vedanta.

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      Arnab Das, Indians are worshippers and propounders of Pseudoscience! I've seen millions of example of this. They don't even know the real definition of Science.
      This Archana is another spinner of Pseudoscience and is speaking absolute NONSENSE - & which is being appreciated here by brainless Indians who've NO sense Logic and Ratioinality (qualities which are pathetically absent in Indian society)!

  • @ballyragoonanan
    @ballyragoonanan ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I would also like to hear what Professor Subash Kak has to say about this subject.
    .

  • @shivamumbai1
    @shivamumbai1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Quantum physics is an analogical concept, by the modern research scholar to understand vedantic cosmic values at objective intelligence model level.Yatha pinde tatha bhramande.

  • @treeoflife666
    @treeoflife666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mandookyspanishad: "When chittham quivers, the phenomenal world; when chittham is quiescent, brahman."
    "The cognition of Brahman (ultimate reality) terminates in an act of anubhava; hence as it has been shown that reasoning is more closley connected with anubhava than sruti is, we have the right to apply reasoning to sruti.”
    "Prajnanam Brahman" Ultimate reality is pure Consciousness.

  • @UMS9695
    @UMS9695 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Superb analysis! That the universe is "Consciousness of Shiva" will be proved by science eventually!
    Archanaji's explanation of karma is a little difficult to accept. She implies that the Brahmanda (Universe) is exclusive of jeevatmas and that it has been created for the jeevatmas by, if you may, Paramatma or Parabrahman to help jeevatma burn out their karmas. This view, then, fails to address how, where and when did jeevatmas got created and then accrued their karmas. I would like to know her take on this.

    • @adarshom4255
      @adarshom4255 ปีที่แล้ว

      Go to arya samaj. Learn about ishwar jeeva prakriti

  • @rajeshbhgat
    @rajeshbhgat ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What an eye-opening insight, thanks Payaljee (Citti) and Archanajee for putting this together.

    • @_etg
      @_etg 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      fricking pseudo science

  • @shirishjoshi7137
    @shirishjoshi7137 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Madams! Thanks for simply amazing program.
    I read about Adwaita and instantly impressed by one of the most Beautiful concept proposed by it.
    I mean, if We All Are One, then where is the Conflict?
    But I never believed that this could be related to Physics.
    Thanks!

  • @hnnagendra1319
    @hnnagendra1319 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazingly explain, more is required to substantiate it's glory by learning our Scripture
    Prastana Traya.

  • @sarbanisarkar9787
    @sarbanisarkar9787 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One question....
    If Bramhan witnessing and thereby creating ..
    Then if he does continuously then Electron should always behave as particle as Bramhan witnessing and watching...

  • @Hupplang77777
    @Hupplang77777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Vedanta propaganda,. By ignorant.

  • @gopinathgovindaraj7105
    @gopinathgovindaraj7105 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hare Krishna. Only thing I don’t like always calling Advida Vedanta. This is just beginning. All dream happening in Maha Vishnus’s body. May end with Dvaita Vedanta. We never become God. aham brahmasmi in quality not in quantity.

    • @sachitvarshney1495
      @sachitvarshney1495 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually you are misreprenting advaitins

    • @sachitvarshney1495
      @sachitvarshney1495 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dvait vedant can be rooted as fictional as it suffers from evil paradox

  • @mayajagannathan130
    @mayajagannathan130 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    As much as Archanaji is profound , that much the host is floundering! Wish we had a more well informed Host 🙏

    • @EashwerIyer
      @EashwerIyer ปีที่แล้ว

      Host is so bad it bordered on terrible

  • @Nokapp23
    @Nokapp23 ปีที่แล้ว

    (1) Dr.John Hagelin: Veda and Physics: th-cam.com/video/4u3f7_p1i8c/w-d-xo.html
    (2) The Primacy of Consciousness th-cam.com/video/-d4ugppcRUE/w-d-xo.html
    (3) The Secret Connection Between Quantum Physics And Buddhism th-cam.com/video/Nj4SP3aCapo/w-d-xo.html

  • @rram4772
    @rram4772 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you (Dr Archana Raghuram) talk about "Sakshi Chaitanyam" you mentioned Brahman created the Universe. Are you referring Nirguna or Saguna Brahman?

  • @prashanthkk7875
    @prashanthkk7875 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Archanaji,Nice to see you here.

  • @jayachandranthampi4807
    @jayachandranthampi4807 ปีที่แล้ว

    You talk in English as if you are English.....what a shame.....I have to write in English.....what a shame.....shame we all are .....

  • @prakashraju1889
    @prakashraju1889 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So finally the entire theory of the Universe exists on Big Bang, which no one can explain. It is like saying Give me the Big Bang and I will give you your universe. Vedanta I am sure has an explanation on the origins of the Universe.

    • @amindra963
      @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Extrapolating Radio Waves backwards; and coming up with a beginning number of 13.8 billion years from Zero is just ridiculous; even comical.
      Vedanta looks directly at REALITY to find the Ultimate and Correct Answer.

    • @SB-wu6pz
      @SB-wu6pz ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no origin.Origin implies time

  • @rram4772
    @rram4772 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When a person X looks at the world, the world gets its' existence. The world can affect me even if I am NOT looking at it and hence I can infer its' existence. How do you explain this?

  • @VR-1962
    @VR-1962 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🙏🙏🙏❤️🙏🙏🙏❤️🙏🙏🙏
    I am pretty simple human and don't know about the Vedaanta, Spiritual Science/ Knowledge and believe there is something, it can take care of me.
    But looking at the flower and fauna and humans, all so called living or non-living beings, there is the existence of such INTELLIGENCE POWER that manipulated whole Life and Universes.
    I remember Ramana Maharshi, once some what he should do to attain Self awareness. Answered by Bhagawan that don't do anything but take Sharanagatha to what he perceived and which is asking him to do.
    There is a Famous personality stated that Humans don't invented anything they just Discovered, what's already in existence.
    Thanks for bringing such a valuable subject

  • @alexisandcrystal1
    @alexisandcrystal1 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aulthough this lady deserves respect, she has some of the quantum systems a bit mixed. Also, her definition of entropy is turned around. Sorry I’m skeptical but when one speaks of physics and meditation, they have to really correlate as when there are empirical and longitudinal studies to end at
    the scientific results.

  • @70newlife
    @70newlife ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Arre bas re bas!!
    Phele tatti road aur khet me karne ka maslah solve karlo phir quantum physics me jana.

    • @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan
      @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan ปีที่แล้ว

      Abe chutiya. apni aukat me reh.
      First of all you have no idea what Nonduality Advaita Vedanta is and on top of that you dare to call advaita vedanta as pseudoscience. western science is pseudo-sankhya do you know that? don't reply on this unless you properly understand this. remove that name of yours you are insulting that name. FYI nonduality is nondual cosmic pure energy from which everything physical forms manifests in chain of cause and effects in this universe. this is parallel with the idea of unified quantum field from which evey form or particle manifests and constitutes this universe.
      "After the conversions about Vedanta, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly made much more sense" -- Werner Heisenberg (Quantum physisist)
      "I go into the upanishads to ask questions" -- Niels Bohr (Quantum physisist)
      "The vastest knowledge of today cannot transcend the buddhi (intellect) of the Rishis in ancient India; and science in it's most advanced stage now, is closer to vedanta then ever before" -- Alfred North Whitehead (Great British Philosopher, mathematician).
      Atheism is also a religion a blind belief system that god dosent exist just because almost everybody cannot find it. You dont have to find god you just have to understand what exactly god is to check weather it exists or not in the existence or as part of existence or the existence itsel, it is that simple. still people dont get it. Vedanta is not a belief system or a religion it is result of logic and common sense. Vedanta is using Shankhya logic and sankhya principles like Pratyaksha, anumaan and pramaan are the origins of the basic scientific method of observation, phypothesis and evidence. west stole it and called it science which is pseudo-sankhya. this world is brainashed by western narratives so much that the truth sounds nonsense. because you have become nonsense.

  • @rallabandimanasa2033
    @rallabandimanasa2033 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    😮😱😐😬 I am experiencing a mix of all kind of emotions when I hear this ….. 🤯 it makes me wonder & think …. How can we not forget this… this every single human has to know/ experience/ understand!! It’s mind boggling/ blowing/ bizarre yet simple & beautiful

  • @Hupplang77777
    @Hupplang77777 ปีที่แล้ว

    Vadanta should learn from Shankara follower.
    Quantum should be learn from rational scientist. Not blind Faith women like this.

  • @sy9505
    @sy9505 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Enlightened by Archana ji, many of my doubts were cleared , thank you for your talk. I wish the hostess was a bit more suited for her role. She appeared to be performing cursorily.

  • @sangeethaamotilal8119
    @sangeethaamotilal8119 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I would like to suggest that there is nothing separate like heaven and hell.
    All the karmic cycle is played out here in this physical world.
    Good karma places a soul in a healthy body, safe, convenient, conducive surroundings, so that by self control, discipline, commitment, it can grow spiritually, at the same time enjoy simple pleasures of life without getting attached to them. This is heaven.
    As against getting an imperfect/diseased/weak body, born in poor, unsafe circumstances, etc. The permutations and combinations are factors of accumulated karma.
    But every soul has a choice and by dedicated and sustained efforts, can raise levels of spirituality or the other way also by getting into the clutches of maaya and indulgence.

  • @harinarayana6393
    @harinarayana6393 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God bless you Archna Raghuraman thanks maim.

  • @rv0_0
    @rv0_0 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    She doesn't even understand the Double slit experiment and she is giving Gyan XDXD
    This is laughable.

  • @dharmverma7595
    @dharmverma7595 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quantum entanglement, I believe, is pointing towards another layer of principles deep under the layer of principles of QM. Speed of light is function of medium of space through which it travels. Similarly, there may be another medium in space through which quantum information travels at almost an speed of instantaneousness. The experiments for which Noble prize has been given do not rule out this popossibility.

    • @softlikesilk
      @softlikesilk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are correct. Classical, then Quantum, and now Phase Space. Geometric Phase.......

  • @asaivenk
    @asaivenk ปีที่แล้ว

    Whatever Archana is quoting is a postulate in Quantum Physics which has no proof. Why the Schroedinger equation works is something no one knows. All we know is that some experimentally observed data is reproduced by the theory. Further, QM always talks about the observed, not the observer. Whereas Vedanta talks about the observer which is not within the framework of QM. I believe Vedanta stands on its own and doesn't require relation to QM. Also the validity big bang theory is widely debated. Firstly the question that scientists doesn't ask is , into which hascthe big bang expanded? There should be space before the big bang into which it expanded. Then question comes who created the space. And the questions never end... That is why Vedanta says there is no creation.

  • @ishanrai1575
    @ishanrai1575 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Only thing I could say to her and the people in comments is :
    STOP IT ! GET SOME HELP😑

  • @Reddy43212
    @Reddy43212 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can you derive any physics formula out of the scripture u r mentioned, or give ex of a formula based up on the scriptures , you r talking of karma which has no basis ✅

  • @JustSeis
    @JustSeis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Let us remain sane ….science is not same as religion ! Of course, there are related experience in science about human body, mind and ailments….none to do with Quantum Physics,

  • @narindernath5186
    @narindernath5186 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hindu Vedic philosophy deal with Hypothesis Theories but only thing it lacks Technologies to use these theories for mankind to make life easy , which has done by West in last 300 years. May be due to 1000 years of foreign rules in India.

  • @nitish9920
    @nitish9920 ปีที่แล้ว

    There definitely is a connection between the Vedic view and quantum theory. But not in the way that Archana ji explains, at least in my opinion. The reasoning and explanation of quantum theory's fundamental statements was very mediocre and full of fallacies. It's possible though that she was dumbing the theory down for the audience.

  • @chittoghosh594
    @chittoghosh594 ปีที่แล้ว

    These talks are simply idiotic. Vedanta expert Swami Vivekananda had never claimed so. In this era when hindutva is made the flavour of season, such brazen talks are funded by political dispension

  • @Subuhi61
    @Subuhi61 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very simply if every complex pattern or system needs a creator, then pray by that logic who should have created the creator/ god. There is no limit to how far that logic can be stretched till you come to the conclusion that that logic has to be absurd and faulty. Poor reasoning by the physicist in my opinion.

  • @Raj-do7gs
    @Raj-do7gs ปีที่แล้ว +2

    23:40 Didi namaste, will you please tell me how you came to the conclusion that we are proclaiming this Maya sidhant only for 4000 years (if our universe is 2023+4000 years old you are right!!!)?🙏
    36:57 like this Ravati & Brahmaji's story there are hundreds of such similarities, questions arise in the mind are all coincidence???🤔

  • @ponmala3063
    @ponmala3063 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need an observer, which means that you have the duality of the observer and the thing observed. How do you reconcile that with Advaita Vedanta (non-duality)?

  • @ravichandrapalaparthi8012
    @ravichandrapalaparthi8012 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we "explain' the concept / existence of 'heaven' or 'hell' in the context of quantum mechanics?

  • @viswanathanseshadri1047
    @viswanathanseshadri1047 ปีที่แล้ว

    What you and we as viewers need to understand is that it is not as if Quantum Physics has Hindu roots. Quantum Physics has been what it has always been. Rather it is that Hindus of the past may have been at this place earlier where physicists today have reached Such scenario is not inconceivable. But there really is no cause for pride or self-preening here. Forr if today physicists and scientists have reached certain places, there was a particular outlook and approach to things which facilitated this journey. It is possible as indeed it is happening right in front of us that such an approach no longer informs our outlook. In the past also, it is possible that Hindus had once this kind of outlook, but lost that outlook. And most relevantly can we honestly say currently we live our lives with such outlook? If we do not now have this kind of outlook, there is little point in claiming credit by association with your ancestors of the past who might or might not have scaled those heights.

  • @swarnareddy7412
    @swarnareddy7412 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does that mean, let’s say a table in front of me, will be perceived differently by different consciousness?

  • @Moolavasi
    @Moolavasi ปีที่แล้ว

    The biological time is same as your brother no matter you travel in bus or lighting container. So I differ 35.00

  • @celestialteapot309
    @celestialteapot309 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So when human are extinct nothing will be observed, there for nothing will exist?

  • @hnuke
    @hnuke ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Needs talent to connect disparate subjects like quantum physics and philosophical subjects like Vedanta 😂 amazing how well learned people can talk bs for hours confidently

  • @kesavatadipatri9078
    @kesavatadipatri9078 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is complete nonsense. This person does not know Physics and does not know Vedanta either - Physics does not say what she claims and Vedanta does not say what she claims. In fact there is a narrative that when Einstein and Tagore met, apparently Tagore said that an observer is needed for the existence of the things and Einstein retorted that philosophically he is more advanced - he knows that even after both of them leave that room and no one is there, still the chairs and table will remain intact in that room.
    No scientists are talking about the correlation between Quantum Physics and Vedanta. Only these bogus pseudo-personalities are creating this myth. One deals with the physical world and the other deals with the spiritual world. There is absolutely no link between the two.

  • @ashoklallitmahindroo1673
    @ashoklallitmahindroo1673 ปีที่แล้ว

    If matter only exists when it is observed consciously, does that mean that human consciousness can manifest matter whenever it chooses to? This means that the practice of Yog (connectivity/ consciousness) actually enhances man’s ability to create or destroy matter. So Musk doesn’t need to create a rocket to colonise Mars. He only needs to create a conscious team that has a common vision.

  • @mathewpg7250
    @mathewpg7250 ปีที่แล้ว

    A simple doubt.. If a particle is not there and it comes into existence when you observe it, then what you initially observe or you look for ?

  • @sivasakthisaravanan4850
    @sivasakthisaravanan4850 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's absolutely incorrect to say that nothing exists until you observe (or measure) it. QM does NOT say that. It only says that the value of something you want to measure is a superposition of all possible values (or eigen states), so that you have a probability density function (a wave function) and when you make a measurement, you see the value to be one of those eigen values (or the wave function collapses to one of the eigen states). Nowhere it says the particle does not exist until you observe/measure it. If you are interested in position of a particle, before you make a measurement, you have a probability associated with each point in the allowed range (which can be finite or infinite); after measuring/observing, you find it in a particular place with 100% certainty. That's all. Whether you observe or not the particle very much exists, only that you don't have an accurate knowledge of where it is. The observable can even be the spin state of an electron, which can take the values of Up and Down. Before measuring, you have probabilities associated with the two states, after measuring it will be either Up or Down. Does it mean that before i measure, the electron had no spin?!! Not at all! An electron cannot exist without spin. QM does not say that reality does not exist. Watch Sabine's videos: th-cam.com/video/RQv5CVELG3U/w-d-xo.html Quantum eraser experiment
    th-cam.com/video/Wsjgtp9XZxo/w-d-xo.html Has quantum mechanics proved that reality does not exist?

    • @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15
      @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am so happy to see this comment. People don't even remember basics of class 12th physics, they are just believing her.

  • @RajasekharPolapragada
    @RajasekharPolapragada ปีที่แล้ว

    Pl. Note one point or link is still missing. From consciousness to universe. Dream is a good example. But still mithya or Maya is not well defined by physics.

  • @vasanthakumar663
    @vasanthakumar663 ปีที่แล้ว

    British and our not enlighten persons thought Vedas are just mantras.But our Vedas are so wide and wast Now atleast remember

  • @madhavannarayanan2147
    @madhavannarayanan2147 ปีที่แล้ว

    One needs a detailed understanding of both the theories and experiements in physics and also a deep understanding of vedanta in order to make these connections. Also, there is more than one school of vedantic thought, not just advaita vedanta. This topic needs much more careful and objective analysis than what has been presented here.

  • @mayankacharya7505
    @mayankacharya7505 ปีที่แล้ว

    To my perception any scientific subjects are no more connected to any vedas and any of Sanathan spiritual aspects it is irrelevant and exaggerated

  • @kkhhrrhh1993
    @kkhhrrhh1993 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The world is real but temporary 🕉🙏🏾😊

  • @subbaramjayaram6862
    @subbaramjayaram6862 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well explained. But madam ay some pint of time our Soul has to liberate itself when there will be no birth. And thus liberation had to happen to all including our Sun earth the galaxy etc. Jayaram

  • @jalenduvaidya2541
    @jalenduvaidya2541 ปีที่แล้ว

    How you come up with all percentages? Disagree with her in many ways.

  • @bodhisattva6308
    @bodhisattva6308 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    While I am a atheist witn hindu heritage and proud of my heritage but this is plain non sense to connect quantum mechanics with Hindu concepts in desperation to show religion as scientific. All religions can claim these kind of vague linkages. Please don’t ridicule Hinduism with these kind of connectivity with pseudoscience

    • @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan
      @Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan ปีที่แล้ว

      First of all you have no idea what Nonduality Advaita Vedanta is and on top of that you dare to call advaita vedanta as pseudoscience. western science is pseudo-sankhya do you know that? don't reply on this unless you properly understand this. remove that name of yours you are insulting that name. FYI nonduality is nondual cosmic pure energy from which everything physical forms manifests in chain of cause and effects in this universe. this is parallel with the idea of unified quantum field from which evey form or particle manifests and constitutes this universe.
      "After the conversions about Vedanta, some of the ideas of quantum physics that had seemed so crazy suddenly made much more sense" -- Werner Heisenberg (Quantum physisist)
      "I go into the upanishads to ask questions" -- Niels Bohr (Quantum physisist)
      "The vastest knowledge of today cannot transcend the buddhi (intellect) of the Rishis in ancient India; and science in it's most advanced stage now, is closer to vedanta then ever before" -- Alfred North Whitehead (Great British Philosopher, mathematician).
      Atheism is also a religion a blind belief system that god dosent exist just because almost everybody cannot find it. You dont have to find god you just have to understand what exactly god is to check weather it exists or not in the existence or as part of existence or the existence itsel, it is that simple. still people dont get it. Vedanta is not a belief system or a religion it is result of logic and common sense. Vedanta is using Shankhya logic and sankhya principles like Pratyaksha, anumaan and pramaan are the origins of the basic scientific method of observation, phypothesis and evidence. west stole it and called it science which is pseudo-sankhya. this world is brainashed by western narratives so much that the truth sounds nonsense. because you have become nonsesnse.

    • @bodhisattva6308
      @bodhisattva6308 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Yogis_BitterTruth_Nirvan I have a good knowledge in physics with a post grad education. Please don’t quote Neil’s Bohr to me ☝️😀. Vedas are long set of absolute useless things today. All holy scriptures are man mad including Quran and bible etc. miracles don’t exist. Go preach to someone else. The same arguements and better ones are presented by other religions as well. Does not make them true. What is truth is to be empirically tested. In science we don’t care if Einstein or Heisenberg says something. What matter is if it can be tested with evidence by people who also oppose the idea. Come to think of it vedas Quran or bible could not telll us that washing hands with soap will help kill most of the germs and avoid many communicable diseases…😏

    • @SB-wu6pz
      @SB-wu6pz ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@bodhisattva6308
      Evidence means causality which itself is a tricky affair.Science itself is standing on philosophy to validate it.Nobody is clear whether maths is discovered or invented then how can equation written in that be tested.Space and Time looks dubious then how come testing done in that frame be taken as evidence.Lot of issues are there. Vedanta might not be science but science also is not on very sure footing these days!!!

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      BodhiSattva, Indians are worshippers and propounders of Pseudoscience! I've seen millions of example of this. They don't even know the real definition of Science.
      This Archana is another spinner of Pseudoscience and is speaking absolute NONSENSE - & which is being appreciated here by brainless Indians who've NO sense Logic and Ratioinality (qualities which are pathetically absent in Indian society)!

  • @mettlus
    @mettlus ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been saying for all this time it’s all Maya
    Amit Goswami

  • @dhananjayadas8974
    @dhananjayadas8974 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Simply superb

  • @prashantck943
    @prashantck943 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautifully explained Ma'am!!!

  • @sagarmdod8896
    @sagarmdod8896 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please stop the BS and stop misleading poor folks here!

  • @sudhirphanse6568
    @sudhirphanse6568 ปีที่แล้ว

    हिंदू सस्कृती ही ७००० वर्षा पूर्वी पासून वेद काळा पासून अस्तित्वात आहे,वेदांचे वय त्याहीपेक्षा पूर्वी पासूनच अरित्वात होते.
    चारही वेदांतात विश्वाच्या निर्मिती पासून पृथ्वी तळावरील हजारो वर्षे शेकडो ऋषी मुनींच्या आश्रमात कोणत्याही मशिनरी शिवाय संशोधन करून हिंदू संस्कृती निर्मिती झाली आहेच.मनातील शब्द रचना उच्चारून विश्वाच्या गर्भात शब्द समूह पाठवले जात,त्याला भाषेचे बंधन नव्हतेच,त्याचं प्रमाणे वैश्विक विचार पृथ्वीवर संक्रमित होत असत.
    पण ध्वनीची महानता आणि वैश्विक विचार संक्रमण अंकलित करून त्या शब्दोच्चार संस्कृत भाषेत गुरू परंपरेने विकसित करून पिढ्या दरपिढ्या पाठातराने आणि नंतर लीपिबध केला गेला,तेच हे हिंदू संस्कृतीचे जिवन व्यथित करण्याचे साधन म्हणूनच मान्यता प्राप्त झाले.

  • @arishsahani
    @arishsahani ปีที่แล้ว

    Can any one name in islamic and christian world like hindu women you are watching .

  • @profskmehta
    @profskmehta ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Indeed the last year’s Nobel has created a situation in QM which can be resolved by Advait Vedant. How ever I must disagree with ArchanaJi’s initial points. The puzzle of specific parameters of the universe is addressed by multiverse thesis.
    Einstein’s relativity has absolutely nothing to do with Vedantic metaphysics. Thirdly, in QM it is not said that a particle comes to exist when it is observed. It says that a subsystem in a quantum state jumps to an “observable state” when probed. The problem of two slit experiment is the wave-particle state conflict. You have misunderstood the conclusion of the reader here of the 3 Physics Nobel winners. It does not say that particles don’t exist until probed. What they have shown is that identity variable theory proposed by Einstein is false.
    Actually the connection between QM and Advaita is deeper and we can argue the existence of Subtle Universe, part of Advaita metaphysics.

  • @desairajtube
    @desairajtube ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful and liberating discussion

  • @jagannathanrengarajan2941
    @jagannathanrengarajan2941 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who is this Smt Archana Raghuraman and what is she?

  • @sheelapawarpawar7400
    @sheelapawarpawar7400 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why are you explaing in English is it our language

  • @RaghuramPrasadVemuri-vq5cg
    @RaghuramPrasadVemuri-vq5cg ปีที่แล้ว

    Does observation limit to seeing with eyes

  • @Gamer-ik7gk
    @Gamer-ik7gk 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gobarbhakts always be a gobarbhakts

  • @PobitroMon
    @PobitroMon 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Are people really believe in this sh*t 😂😂

  • @raghubirlalkhajuria127
    @raghubirlalkhajuria127 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Right you are.
    I am also using theories of physics and quantum mechanis in the light of vedas, upnished and Gita.

  • @RajasekharPolapragada
    @RajasekharPolapragada ปีที่แล้ว

    Pl. Call Advaita not vedanta as former is what our rishis said long back. Dvaita and vidodhta Advaita are also accepted by some Indians as vedanta.

  • @mmganesh6087
    @mmganesh6087 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    try the book written by gary zukav. called the dancing wu li masters... it has relevance to this videol

  • @Nokapp23
    @Nokapp23 ปีที่แล้ว

    Science and Nonduality.

  • @abstubeindia6979
    @abstubeindia6979 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's one of extremely wonderful, brief and well understandable explanation of what is God in real sense i.e, absolute consciousness bliss "sachhidananda"

  • @jaisanatan2687
    @jaisanatan2687 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To happen any thing KARATA , KARAM and KARAN is essential . KARATA is observer

  • @sheelapawarpawar7400
    @sheelapawarpawar7400 ปีที่แล้ว

    Explain in Hindi or Marathi

  • @ramagopalj5686
    @ramagopalj5686 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gochara and agochara jagath - sarvam Midhya -

  • @chakrichakravarthi746
    @chakrichakravarthi746 ปีที่แล้ว

    Rama-🦜🐄😘💖🐿️🕊️.!!.

  • @cyberwoodoo9466
    @cyberwoodoo9466 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What a load of bullshit.

  • @amindra963
    @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    " Dao of Physics" by Fritrof Capra. The classic on quantum physics and Vedanta.

    • @ram76157
      @ram76157 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tao

    • @amindra963
      @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U R right. Pronounced Dao just swing.

    • @mmganesh6087
      @mmganesh6087 ปีที่แล้ว

      also by gary zukav. book is " the dancing wu li masters. "

    • @amindra963
      @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes!

    • @kumarakantirava429
      @kumarakantirava429 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your book recommendation.