The ancient Hindu roots of Quantum Physics: Archana Raghuram's full talk

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 278

  • @TheFestivalofBharat
    @TheFestivalofBharat  ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Are you aware that we have spent crores of Rupees (hundreds of thousands of dollars) over the past few years to build Citti Media, yet deliver all of our content 100% free of cost ? To support us as we continue to expand, please contribute to Citti Media’s fundraisers generously, on Dharmic Crowd Funding: dharmiccrowdfunding.com/?s=Citti+media 🙏🏼❤🙏🏼
    Partner Links:
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding: dharmiccrowdfunding.com
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding on Twitter: twitter.com/DharmicFunding
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding on Instagram: instagram.com/dharmiccrowdfunding
    >> Dharmic Crowd Funding on Facebook: facebook.com/dharmiccrowdfunding
    >> Citti Media on DCF: dharmiccrowdfunding.com/?s=Citti
    Citti Media Links:
    >> To view all Citti Media English playlists, please click here: th-cam.com/users/CittiMediaplaylists
    >> To view all Festival of Bharat playlists, please click here: th-cam.com/users/TheFestivalofBharatplaylists
    >> To subscribe to the Citti Media English TH-cam channel, please click the subscribe button at: th-cam.com/users/CittiMedia
    >> To subscribe to The Festival of Bharat TH-cam channel, please click the subscribe button at: th-cam.com/users/TheFestivalofBharat
    >> Sign up for our newsletter here: www.citti.net
    >> Donate via our website: www.citti.net/donate
    >> Join us on our Telegram group: t.me/cittimedia
    >> Follow us on Twitter: twitter.com/CittiMedia
    >> Instagram: instagram.com/cittimedia
    >> Facebook: facebook.com/cittimedia
    >> & Koo: www.kooapp.com/profile/CittiMedia

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      This Archana is another Pseudo-science Propagandist! She is another "graduate" of the RSS University which specialises in Pseudo-Science and converting Mythology in Science. All her arguments are blatantly FALLACIOUS!
      These Right-wing Jokers with twisted brains indulge in a dubious practice called Scientific Foreknowledge! As per their twisted wisdom all things discovered by real Science have their "roots" in ancient India scriptures; and then they go about creating dubious "associations" between real Scientific theories/discoveries with things mentioned in Hindu religious scriptures.
      Mind you, this is totally different from some real scientific knowledge in ancient India.
      And what nonsense is this "consciousness" that Archana is singing? What has that got to do with real scientific theories and inventions? The term "consciousness" is applicable to Spirituality and things related to the Mind - not to Science.
      What most Indians do not know they suffer from deep Inferiority Complex (visa-a-vis the West) and are brainwashed from childhood into fake beliefs of all kinds. They don't even know the definition of Science. They are worshippers of fake knowledge! They brainlessly believe any thing that glorifies Ancient India, Hinduism and Scriptures.
      This explains their laughable habit of creating Pseudo-Science and converting Mythology in Science.

    • @AkshayChaitanya
      @AkshayChaitanya ปีที่แล้ว

      You're doing a great service of mankind. Today landed on this channel. A blessing in disguise. Quantum physics is taught step by step via 9 schools of Indian philosophy. Though discussion starts after someone gets the Nobel prize.

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AkshayChaitanya , what the hell did you say, _"great service to mankind"?_ !!! You are another low IQ Hindu.
      There are NO ancient Hindu roots of Quantum Physics! This Archana lady is another MAD Pseudo-scientist who is irrationally applying “Consciousness” (related to thought-patterns) to Physics (related only to the Material world) by playing with the term “Consciousness”!
      The scientist at 10:20 said: _“A particle has no real existence until it is observed._ "
      But this stupid Pseudo-scientist has misinterpreted what the Scientist said to justify her airy-fairy Vedantic definition of Consciousness, as per which Universe is based on Consciousness. And then she says, this Universe is created by Brahman by simply witnessing it. LOL!
      This is nothing but “playing with words” to create fanciful theories (for delirious Andha Bhakts of Ancient India)!
      Consciousness is related to the state of our Psyche/Mind. Quantum Physics is about researching and discovering things (like in all scientific pursuits).
      You cannot OVERSTRETCH its definition (like this mad women has done) and then say Quantum Physics has its roots in Vedanta! Ridiculous!
      Going by her definition of Consciousness, if we start thinking and dreaming of Aliens, will they start appearing before you? Hell, NO! LOL!

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      Archana Raghuram is a mad woman speaking delirious NONSENSE!
      3:48 _“If you look at Big Bang, it has been fine-tuned for the creation of the Universe. If Big Bang was .0001% more powerful the Universe would not exist._ ”
      6:21 _“Universe exist for the explicit purpose of creating life._ ”
      This woman is simply parading childish assertions out of existing Discoveries (of which she has NO basic understanding of).
      If Universe exists for creation of Life forms, why then aren’t there any life-forms on other Planets? If Big Bang was .0001% more powerful then, probably, another form of Universe would’ve come into existence.
      Then this MAD woman asserts that her 2nd “childish assertion” is same as theory of Karma - which says Universe is for all living beings to EXHAUST their Karma!

    • @hook-x6f
      @hook-x6f 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      that zit is a whopper

  • @dominicayyanikkatt7463
    @dominicayyanikkatt7463 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    For those interested in Vedanta and Physics,I would recommend Maya in Physics by N C Panda,published by Motilal Banarsidass,Delhi.It is highly scholarly and suited for both specialists and serious beginners.

  • @dancingnachos3634
    @dancingnachos3634 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Goosebumps! Thanks

  • @ArjunSharma-zk4yy
    @ArjunSharma-zk4yy ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Would like to see more videos on ancient India knowledge

  • @robbinlittle
    @robbinlittle ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very interesting and very heavy... May be a prelude session to prepare for this podcast would help.

  • @prashanthkk7875
    @prashanthkk7875 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Archanaji,Nice to see you here.

  • @eternalthoughts-wu5lo
    @eternalthoughts-wu5lo ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have seen Archana jis channel videos ...very good channel.I recommend it strongly to all youth

  • @ramum9599
    @ramum9599 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Lady researcher opening layman,s eyes is really great !!How Scence and Vedanta are correlating is tremendous idea which laymen do not know until anyone like this Lady explains !!!!🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @_etg
      @_etg ปีที่แล้ว

      that lady is speaking pseudo science

  • @harinarayana6393
    @harinarayana6393 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God bless you Archna Raghuraman thanks maim.

  • @ANBhat123
    @ANBhat123 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is such an important topic which needs to be discussed more in our mainstream culture. Shankarcharya is really the jagadguru and he should be taught more and more in the world .
    As Vivekananda said advaita is the Religion of the future 🙏🏻

  • @rajeshbhgat
    @rajeshbhgat ปีที่แล้ว +5

    What an eye-opening insight, thanks Payaljee (Citti) and Archanajee for putting this together.

    • @_etg
      @_etg ปีที่แล้ว +1

      fricking pseudo science

  • @gokuls9929
    @gokuls9929 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I am more concerned looking at the comments section than at the video!

  • @hnnagendra1319
    @hnnagendra1319 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Amazingly explain, more is required to substantiate it's glory by learning our Scripture
    Prastana Traya.

  • @desairajtube
    @desairajtube ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautiful and liberating discussion

  • @prashantck943
    @prashantck943 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Beautifully explained Ma'am!!!

  • @dhananjayadas8974
    @dhananjayadas8974 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Simply superb

  • @shivaji856
    @shivaji856 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    People speak stylishly in english accent but donot know the difference between Nobel and Noble...and pronounce Nobel as Noble.

  • @dharmapriyasinha3017
    @dharmapriyasinha3017 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ❤🎉wow! Never heard this complex science explained with such clarity. Thank you🙏 I'm sharing it with everyone I know.

    • @RohanRajadhyaksha
      @RohanRajadhyaksha ปีที่แล้ว +4

      And that's exactly how pseudoscience and obscurantism spreads! 🙄

    • @keerti6808
      @keerti6808 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@RohanRajadhyaksha Ok Einstein

  • @ashawarrier1093
    @ashawarrier1093 ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing Archana Ji. Thankyou so much for this interesting knowledge

  • @rajendrannairk.v.5866
    @rajendrannairk.v.5866 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Archana Raghuram is obviously an intelligent and smart woman who is A gift to our Nation. She must be given more responsibility....

    • @ravinayar4314
      @ravinayar4314 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Fixed..interesting choice of words

    • @rajendrannairk.v.5866
      @rajendrannairk.v.5866 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gan Subram if your family belongs to that..

    • @anantha1201
      @anantha1201 ปีที่แล้ว

      No doubt, the anchor seems to be as dumb as a donkey and so is her voice and choice of words like incredible and all. She’s unable to articulate properly even!

  • @raghubirlalkhajuria127
    @raghubirlalkhajuria127 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Right you are.
    I am also using theories of physics and quantum mechanis in the light of vedas, upnished and Gita.

  • @dinadayalan9037
    @dinadayalan9037 ปีที่แล้ว

    Archana Raguram is doing a great job. We are blessed to have her

  • @shirishjoshi7137
    @shirishjoshi7137 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Madams! Thanks for simply amazing program.
    I read about Adwaita and instantly impressed by one of the most Beautiful concept proposed by it.
    I mean, if We All Are One, then where is the Conflict?
    But I never believed that this could be related to Physics.
    Thanks!

  • @dharmverma7595
    @dharmverma7595 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Quantum entanglement, I believe, is pointing towards another layer of principles deep under the layer of principles of QM. Speed of light is function of medium of space through which it travels. Similarly, there may be another medium in space through which quantum information travels at almost an speed of instantaneousness. The experiments for which Noble prize has been given do not rule out this popossibility.

    • @softlikesilk
      @softlikesilk ปีที่แล้ว

      You are correct. Classical, then Quantum, and now Phase Space. Geometric Phase.......

  • @ballyragoonanan
    @ballyragoonanan ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I would also like to hear what Professor Subash Kak has to say about this subject.
    .

  • @sasidharv4846
    @sasidharv4846 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very illuminating!

  • @shivamumbai1
    @shivamumbai1 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Quantum physics is an analogical concept, by the modern research scholar to understand vedantic cosmic values at objective intelligence model level.Yatha pinde tatha bhramande.

  • @treeoflife666
    @treeoflife666 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Mandookyspanishad: "When chittham quivers, the phenomenal world; when chittham is quiescent, brahman."
    "The cognition of Brahman (ultimate reality) terminates in an act of anubhava; hence as it has been shown that reasoning is more closley connected with anubhava than sruti is, we have the right to apply reasoning to sruti.”
    "Prajnanam Brahman" Ultimate reality is pure Consciousness.

  • @sanjaydwivedi4003
    @sanjaydwivedi4003 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh great conversation. So enlightening.

  • @sy9505
    @sy9505 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Enlightened by Archana ji, many of my doubts were cleared , thank you for your talk. I wish the hostess was a bit more suited for her role. She appeared to be performing cursorily.

  • @rallabandimanasa2033
    @rallabandimanasa2033 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    😮😱😐😬 I am experiencing a mix of all kind of emotions when I hear this ….. 🤯 it makes me wonder & think …. How can we not forget this… this every single human has to know/ experience/ understand!! It’s mind boggling/ blowing/ bizarre yet simple & beautiful

  • @adityajha2711
    @adityajha2711 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for this excellent exposition of analogy of final words of vedas

  • @ganesh_n
    @ganesh_n ปีที่แล้ว

    Amazing, very insightful video!

  • @vasumathigovindarajan2139
    @vasumathigovindarajan2139 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simply fantastic. Beautifully brought out to the interested public
    Clarity being the high light

  • @swarnareddy7412
    @swarnareddy7412 ปีที่แล้ว

    So well explained Archana. What feeling when you realise that our life is dedicated to prove our existence in every day life but we are surrounded by Maya!!! Wonder what this realisation universally can bring

  • @mayajagannathan130
    @mayajagannathan130 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    As much as Archanaji is profound , that much the host is floundering! Wish we had a more well informed Host 🙏

    • @EashwerIyer
      @EashwerIyer ปีที่แล้ว

      Host is so bad it bordered on terrible

  • @pardeepsharma2164
    @pardeepsharma2164 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing . Thanks

  • @kamalkumarattinagaramu8065
    @kamalkumarattinagaramu8065 ปีที่แล้ว

    Archana garu once again awasome explaintion, your knowledge in Advaita and Physics really amazing.. thank you so much for sharing the knowledge 🙏🙏🙏

  • @VR-1962
    @VR-1962 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🙏🙏🙏❤️🙏🙏🙏❤️🙏🙏🙏
    I am pretty simple human and don't know about the Vedaanta, Spiritual Science/ Knowledge and believe there is something, it can take care of me.
    But looking at the flower and fauna and humans, all so called living or non-living beings, there is the existence of such INTELLIGENCE POWER that manipulated whole Life and Universes.
    I remember Ramana Maharshi, once some what he should do to attain Self awareness. Answered by Bhagawan that don't do anything but take Sharanagatha to what he perceived and which is asking him to do.
    There is a Famous personality stated that Humans don't invented anything they just Discovered, what's already in existence.
    Thanks for bringing such a valuable subject

  • @ashishsabnekar
    @ashishsabnekar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We are a collective consciousness, individuals, distinct and one all at same time!

  • @qbitsday3438
    @qbitsday3438 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just a Beautiful video !

  • @Raj-do7gs
    @Raj-do7gs ปีที่แล้ว +2

    23:40 Didi namaste, will you please tell me how you came to the conclusion that we are proclaiming this Maya sidhant only for 4000 years (if our universe is 2023+4000 years old you are right!!!)?🙏
    36:57 like this Ravati & Brahmaji's story there are hundreds of such similarities, questions arise in the mind are all coincidence???🤔

  • @abstubeindia6979
    @abstubeindia6979 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's one of extremely wonderful, brief and well understandable explanation of what is God in real sense i.e, absolute consciousness bliss "sachhidananda"

  • @cheranjeevijayam8163
    @cheranjeevijayam8163 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Knowledgeable

  • @jollygroup1757
    @jollygroup1757 ปีที่แล้ว

    Archanaji, you are pursuing the matter of connecting physics with our ancient scripts. I had one nagging question all throughout ie., what was there before the creation of the universe looking from the scientific point of view ? There was a talk of multiverses, parallel universes,with laws of physics inversed etc.,in science journals, time dilation, people looking younger, etc., ln the perceived circumstances, I've figured out that, how the universe could have come into existence. What can be the " Theory Of Everything" & quantum entanglement of a pair of photons sharing the same quantum state. All these can be explained, if we make certain changes in our understanding of nature. The idea struck to me after trying to understand what the word "A-dwaitvad" wants to convey. There is a physics awardee, Dr. Asoke Sen who set the physics world rolling by suggesting that "the principle of duality" is invariably followed in the particle physics. N-S pole, the +ve, -ve charges. The solution was there, only we have to look at the physics world differently. Maybe, one should have the psychology of an electrical engineer to understand such invisible, but real phenomenon. All around us there are charges, light & photons. We do not take these into account, but realize when electrocuted, say by overhead lines by induction or on touching. 1- personally, I think time has no physical existence. It is a man made concept to measure the sequence of events & confuses us. 2-To me using light, to measure the speed of light is like using sound to measure the speed of sound, is somewhat ridiculous. It will be proper, if papers are presented in our/international scientific journal rather than discussing in such open forums, because there will be considerable changes due to some change in fundamental building block.

  • @prakashraju1889
    @prakashraju1889 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    So finally the entire theory of the Universe exists on Big Bang, which no one can explain. It is like saying Give me the Big Bang and I will give you your universe. Vedanta I am sure has an explanation on the origins of the Universe.

    • @amindra963
      @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Extrapolating Radio Waves backwards; and coming up with a beginning number of 13.8 billion years from Zero is just ridiculous; even comical.
      Vedanta looks directly at REALITY to find the Ultimate and Correct Answer.

    • @SB-wu6pz
      @SB-wu6pz ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no origin.Origin implies time

  • @ravichandrapalaparthi8012
    @ravichandrapalaparthi8012 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do we "explain' the concept / existence of 'heaven' or 'hell' in the context of quantum mechanics?

  • @madhavannarayanan2147
    @madhavannarayanan2147 ปีที่แล้ว

    One needs a detailed understanding of both the theories and experiements in physics and also a deep understanding of vedanta in order to make these connections. Also, there is more than one school of vedantic thought, not just advaita vedanta. This topic needs much more careful and objective analysis than what has been presented here.

  • @subrataroy5948
    @subrataroy5948 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A very very interesting subject. I'm now convinced that the material and the subtle world exists for me as long as I'm alive meaning I'm conscious.

    • @subrataroy5948
      @subrataroy5948 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gan Subram oh does Advaita say so? What is it that makes me aware of my existence?

    • @subrataroy5948
      @subrataroy5948 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gan Subram sanatan can be understood as a dharma, not a religion. To me dharma is about my duties towards myself and towards everyone and everything that sustains me. It has nothing to do with my way of understanding gods and goddesses.
      Whereas religion has prophet and a canonical book. It survives as long as these are "believed in".
      There are several ways to understand the wisdom of the upanishads. It is incredible to see great masters interpreting that one in different ways.
      Now, whatever it may be, I'd adopt the one that appeals to me the most. This applies to every single Individual because humans are not herds.
      The logic forwarded in Advait Vedanta by Shri Shankaracharya appeals to me the most. The waking, dreaming and deep sleep states of a person does indicate that there is one single witness consciousness.
      Moreover, the entire existence appears with my birth in this body and disappears with the death of this body. I too am a component of this maya, so are even the devis and devatas who's pooja we perform.
      The enlightened alone is able to transcend maya. The vedic knowledge too has no value for that enlightened one.
      After the body perishes what happens? I have no clue to this day.

    • @subrataroy5948
      @subrataroy5948 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Gan Subram as an atheist do you not care about your duties? Well, in the indic traditions we have a stream known as Caarvaak. They too are respected as human beings.

  • @sarbanisarkar9787
    @sarbanisarkar9787 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One question....
    If Bramhan witnessing and thereby creating ..
    Then if he does continuously then Electron should always behave as particle as Bramhan witnessing and watching...

  • @kkhhrrhh1993
    @kkhhrrhh1993 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The world is real but temporary 🕉🙏🏾😊

  • @UMS9695
    @UMS9695 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Superb analysis! That the universe is "Consciousness of Shiva" will be proved by science eventually!
    Archanaji's explanation of karma is a little difficult to accept. She implies that the Brahmanda (Universe) is exclusive of jeevatmas and that it has been created for the jeevatmas by, if you may, Paramatma or Parabrahman to help jeevatma burn out their karmas. This view, then, fails to address how, where and when did jeevatmas got created and then accrued their karmas. I would like to know her take on this.

    • @adarshom4255
      @adarshom4255 ปีที่แล้ว

      Go to arya samaj. Learn about ishwar jeeva prakriti

  • @ponmala3063
    @ponmala3063 ปีที่แล้ว

    You need an observer, which means that you have the duality of the observer and the thing observed. How do you reconcile that with Advaita Vedanta (non-duality)?

  • @subhashzadoo
    @subhashzadoo ปีที่แล้ว

    ॐ!We are thankful to Mahadev to have Blessed Sanatana Dharma a scientist like Nirmala. We are proud progeny of Abhinavgupta, Aryabhatta,Brahmagupt, Bhaskaracharya,Bhagbhat,Charka,Harabhat&other eminent Reshis, they were mathematicians, astrologers,physicians.
    सत्यमेव जयते!
    JAI VAASUDEV KUTAMBUKAM!

  • @ramum9599
    @ramum9599 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Archana is doing a great job of enlightenment for laymen to seek the Real and even get Liberation !!!! Very nice job !!!Let God bless her with Long life and prosperity !!!!🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

    • @prince-hb8qk
      @prince-hb8qk ปีที่แล้ว

      @gansubram4584 you are not real physicist then
      she is real vidanta hindu scientist🤫

  • @adg2103
    @adg2103 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    An extraordinary subject discussed by a person of extraordinary calibre.

    • @_etg
      @_etg ปีที่แล้ว +1

      fricking pseudo science

  • @ntej7927
    @ntej7927 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good Job.Well done.

  • @rram4772
    @rram4772 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When a person X looks at the world, the world gets its' existence. The world can affect me even if I am NOT looking at it and hence I can infer its' existence. How do you explain this?

  • @ashoklallitmahindroo1673
    @ashoklallitmahindroo1673 ปีที่แล้ว

    If matter only exists when it is observed consciously, does that mean that human consciousness can manifest matter whenever it chooses to? This means that the practice of Yog (connectivity/ consciousness) actually enhances man’s ability to create or destroy matter. So Musk doesn’t need to create a rocket to colonise Mars. He only needs to create a conscious team that has a common vision.

  • @mathewpg7250
    @mathewpg7250 ปีที่แล้ว

    A simple doubt.. If a particle is not there and it comes into existence when you observe it, then what you initially observe or you look for ?

  • @TheMoonchild1969
    @TheMoonchild1969 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I sincerely doubt ancient Hindus had any clue of Quantum Mechanics at all.🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      MoonChild, this Festival of India channel is a pathetic propagator of Pseudoscience and all kinds of fake thoughts in support of Ancient Indian and Hinduvta!

  • @maheshthakur3741
    @maheshthakur3741 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video

  • @swarnareddy7412
    @swarnareddy7412 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does that mean, let’s say a table in front of me, will be perceived differently by different consciousness?

  • @sarayusalian
    @sarayusalian ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is extraordinary. The fact that Hinduism is not more widely understood is nothing short of astonishing. The "religion" closest to science. Can you imagine if the roots of other faiths had this type of deep rational thinking? You'd never hear the end of it. Great credit to Hinduism, India, Advaita...Brava

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sarayusalian, your comments are full of fake assertions! Hinduism has nothing to do with Science which is a different subject matter , altogether.
      And this Archana is a LUNATIC teaching Andha Bhakts like you hocus-focus in the name of "Consciousness"! All her arguments are fake!

    • @siddarthshah1773
      @siddarthshah1773 ปีที่แล้ว

      @gansubram4584 hahaha well it has already proved shiva shakti is paramatma in quantam physics.. physicist are now studying shivas mind through universal consciousness also called panphyschism.. the classical physics which you are speaking abt is jst 5% of our universe dumbfuck which is everchanging but quantam physics is a static thing

  • @valerianpereira1259
    @valerianpereira1259 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quantum physics:
    From HINDU Roots: Vedanta:
    Why not make it most operational:
    most applicable
    Practical
    anad used intensely in every field and walk or stream of life.
    Dominta ein this area.
    while the Chinese are.. at this moment.
    Quantum Mathematics
    all from VEDAS?
    WAKE UP: SPECIALISE
    USE IT TO BE THE MOST PRACTICAL ..

  • @ashutoshdutta821
    @ashutoshdutta821 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A lay man querry to you Archanaji, you said things does not exist until we obseve. I agree this observation is physical meaning with eyes or if it could be in concious . Ignoring concious viewing if one walk with closed eye as said often "walking in sleep" then one doesn't see the object in one's way which are present and thus confront with one sleep walking....they how can we say that matter exist only in when one see it.

    • @eternalthoughts-wu5lo
      @eternalthoughts-wu5lo ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Since U R a bengali please read Bhagavadgita ISKCON /Kali Puran/Devi bhagavatam in Bengali only...U will understand it well

    • @vish2553
      @vish2553 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please make your questions clear. All objects arise only in consciousness. Consciousness give EXISTENCE to objects , only in the light of consciousness the whole universe appears.

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eternalthoughts-wu5lo , did you even understand the Question raised by AShutosh? Why are you blindly asking him to read Bhagavadgita ? What nonsense is this?
      Assuming you have read Gita why don't you answer his Question?

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@vish2553 , hello you delusory Andha Bhakt! You don't even know When and How to use the word "consciousness"?
      Going by your delulsory Logic, if we keep on thinking about Aliens will they will appear before us? 🤣😂

    • @vineshv
      @vineshv ปีที่แล้ว

      @@eternalthoughts-wu5lo Can this be not answered here if there is a clear answer?

  • @sundarkrishnaakavapatti685
    @sundarkrishnaakavapatti685 ปีที่แล้ว

    Terrific insights drawing me to consiousness consiously. Dr K L Sundarkrishnaa

  • @rram4772
    @rram4772 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you (Dr Archana Raghuram) talk about "Sakshi Chaitanyam" you mentioned Brahman created the Universe. Are you referring Nirguna or Saguna Brahman?

  • @arunrathi7
    @arunrathi7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent...and not sure, but after listening that the world is not real...this very thought is so liberation and subtlety generates some degree of happiness. No more taking unwanted stress. Doing more meditation and trying to connect with the supreme conscious.

  • @profrajeshmaurya5078
    @profrajeshmaurya5078 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent discussions

  • @RajasekharPolapragada
    @RajasekharPolapragada ปีที่แล้ว

    Pl. Note one point or link is still missing. From consciousness to universe. Dream is a good example. But still mithya or Maya is not well defined by physics.

  • @gopinathgovindaraj7105
    @gopinathgovindaraj7105 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hare Krishna. Only thing I don’t like always calling Advida Vedanta. This is just beginning. All dream happening in Maha Vishnus’s body. May end with Dvaita Vedanta. We never become God. aham brahmasmi in quality not in quantity.

    • @sachitvarshney1495
      @sachitvarshney1495 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually you are misreprenting advaitins

    • @sachitvarshney1495
      @sachitvarshney1495 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dvait vedant can be rooted as fictional as it suffers from evil paradox

  • @RaghuramPrasadVemuri-vq5cg
    @RaghuramPrasadVemuri-vq5cg ปีที่แล้ว

    Does observation limit to seeing with eyes

  • @narindernath5186
    @narindernath5186 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hindu Vedic philosophy deal with Hypothesis Theories but only thing it lacks Technologies to use these theories for mankind to make life easy , which has done by West in last 300 years. May be due to 1000 years of foreign rules in India.

  • @celestialteapot309
    @celestialteapot309 ปีที่แล้ว

    So when human are extinct nothing will be observed, there for nothing will exist?

  • @russellmathews3599
    @russellmathews3599 ปีที่แล้ว

    Surely ....The Festival of India .

  • @samwell707
    @samwell707 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The founding fathers were inspired after reading the Upanishads to search for quantum physics

  • @bhuvaneswarinatarajan2583
    @bhuvaneswarinatarajan2583 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank u

  • @narayanabhandary3014
    @narayanabhandary3014 ปีที่แล้ว

    Really nice!!👍🙂🙏

  • @bjk7797
    @bjk7797 ปีที่แล้ว

    Interesting ,thanks

  • @pawandahake
    @pawandahake ปีที่แล้ว

    But she didn't answered the Einstein question that, if moon was not existed until it was observed by someone.🤔

  • @j.jthompson7639
    @j.jthompson7639 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just fantastic.

  • @bvssrsguntur6338
    @bvssrsguntur6338 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I am a big fan of Archana garu. She can explain complex physics without animations.

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      This Archana is a FRAUD! She is another unofficial graduate of the RSS University where Pseudo-science is taught!

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      @gansubram4584 , are you reacting to me or that big fan of Archana garu?

    • @rajupatnaik7776
      @rajupatnaik7776 ปีที่แล้ว

      @gansubram4584 , one who exposes the Fake beliefs of Andha Bhakts! Now understood who am I?

  • @antonychacko129
    @antonychacko129 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What that madam is speaking ,distorting all the great achievements of science

  • @CypressVintage
    @CypressVintage ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sad part about this...Archana questions the validity of physics to propose God, yet uses physical terms and conditions 0.0001% etc to to say universe was fine tuned for life! Why would a conscious superbeing that wishes an universe into existence worry about turning? So, if it was fine tuned for life, why don't we see life everywhere? Either way, Archana failed in the first three minutes. Sad that she carries any credibility at all.

  • @deepakshukla3670
    @deepakshukla3670 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fantastic!

  • @mmganesh6087
    @mmganesh6087 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    try the book written by gary zukav. called the dancing wu li masters... it has relevance to this videol

  • @sharmilachoudhuri6753
    @sharmilachoudhuri6753 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was awesome 👍👍

  • @alexisandcrystal1
    @alexisandcrystal1 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Aulthough this lady deserves respect, she has some of the quantum systems a bit mixed. Also, her definition of entropy is turned around. Sorry I’m skeptical but when one speaks of physics and meditation, they have to really correlate as when there are empirical and longitudinal studies to end at
    the scientific results.

  • @pawandahake
    @pawandahake ปีที่แล้ว

    Is our existing is because someone is looking us in his/her dream ?
    So, if that god (his/her) stops looking his dream, wheather, we all will get disappear in a flashing time.

  • @sivasakthisaravanan4850
    @sivasakthisaravanan4850 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It's absolutely incorrect to say that nothing exists until you observe (or measure) it. QM does NOT say that. It only says that the value of something you want to measure is a superposition of all possible values (or eigen states), so that you have a probability density function (a wave function) and when you make a measurement, you see the value to be one of those eigen values (or the wave function collapses to one of the eigen states). Nowhere it says the particle does not exist until you observe/measure it. If you are interested in position of a particle, before you make a measurement, you have a probability associated with each point in the allowed range (which can be finite or infinite); after measuring/observing, you find it in a particular place with 100% certainty. That's all. Whether you observe or not the particle very much exists, only that you don't have an accurate knowledge of where it is. The observable can even be the spin state of an electron, which can take the values of Up and Down. Before measuring, you have probabilities associated with the two states, after measuring it will be either Up or Down. Does it mean that before i measure, the electron had no spin?!! Not at all! An electron cannot exist without spin. QM does not say that reality does not exist. Watch Sabine's videos: th-cam.com/video/RQv5CVELG3U/w-d-xo.html Quantum eraser experiment
    th-cam.com/video/Wsjgtp9XZxo/w-d-xo.html Has quantum mechanics proved that reality does not exist?

    • @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15
      @MuskanSingh-kw7ux15 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am so happy to see this comment. People don't even remember basics of class 12th physics, they are just believing her.

  • @viswanathanseshadri1047
    @viswanathanseshadri1047 ปีที่แล้ว

    What you and we as viewers need to understand is that it is not as if Quantum Physics has Hindu roots. Quantum Physics has been what it has always been. Rather it is that Hindus of the past may have been at this place earlier where physicists today have reached Such scenario is not inconceivable. But there really is no cause for pride or self-preening here. Forr if today physicists and scientists have reached certain places, there was a particular outlook and approach to things which facilitated this journey. It is possible as indeed it is happening right in front of us that such an approach no longer informs our outlook. In the past also, it is possible that Hindus had once this kind of outlook, but lost that outlook. And most relevantly can we honestly say currently we live our lives with such outlook? If we do not now have this kind of outlook, there is little point in claiming credit by association with your ancestors of the past who might or might not have scaled those heights.

  • @j.jthompson7639
    @j.jthompson7639 ปีที่แล้ว

    When you are not looking at it means when your( mankinds) consciousness is not observing ( by any means, 5 senses, or probably thoughts, imagination). For example, nothing exists if any of us become unconscious!

  • @subbaramjayaram6862
    @subbaramjayaram6862 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well explained. But madam ay some pint of time our Soul has to liberate itself when there will be no birth. And thus liberation had to happen to all including our Sun earth the galaxy etc. Jayaram

  • @raguramramamoorthy8569
    @raguramramamoorthy8569 ปีที่แล้ว

    why can't it be a blind chance

  • @Prasannakumar-yk7bf
    @Prasannakumar-yk7bf ปีที่แล้ว

    So before the advent of life (observer) there was no universe? Time itself is a myth. It does not exist as it is not defined. What we call time is a relative measurement/recording of events.

  • @parus21
    @parus21 ปีที่แล้ว

    The western view of universal purposeless accidental incidental universe was primitive and its evolution into quantum physics ...the recognition of the existence of conciousness as the fundamental reason cause for material existence is definitely the turn eastward for science and the connection with vedanta the wisdom of sages for ages😊

    • @_etg
      @_etg ปีที่แล้ว

      u guys love pseudo science !

  • @ramum9599
    @ramum9599 ปีที่แล้ว

    Errors in captions !!!

  • @mettlus
    @mettlus ปีที่แล้ว

    I have been saying for all this time it’s all Maya
    Amit Goswami

  • @amindra963
    @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    " Dao of Physics" by Fritrof Capra. The classic on quantum physics and Vedanta.

    • @ram76157
      @ram76157 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tao

    • @amindra963
      @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      U R right. Pronounced Dao just swing.

    • @mmganesh6087
      @mmganesh6087 ปีที่แล้ว

      also by gary zukav. book is " the dancing wu li masters. "

    • @amindra963
      @amindra963 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes!

    • @kumarakantirava429
      @kumarakantirava429 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for your book recommendation.