The sessions and warrant cases have discharge provision and interestingly summons cases do not have. May the statute writers thought summons cases will conclude very quickly within a matter of day or two or three and so the process of discharge etc, is unnecessary wording to be included in the statute. But, looking at the way things are happening, even summons cases hp one for years subjecting the accused to great discomfort and loss, even if at the end of trial and appeal, the acquittal happens. There should be a provision that the biggest litigator state should compensate because they implicate and they delay.
Thank u sir
It's a delight to listen honourable sir
We are very grateful for ramkumar sir
Really nice throwing a light on law very briefly is helpful to judicial aspirants and practicing advocates is commendable job sir..
Glad you found it useful.
The sessions and warrant cases have discharge provision and interestingly summons cases do not have. May the statute writers thought summons cases will conclude very quickly within a matter of day or two or three and so the process of discharge etc, is unnecessary wording to be included in the statute. But, looking at the way things are happening, even summons cases hp one for years subjecting the accused to great discomfort and loss, even if at the end of trial and appeal, the acquittal happens. There should be a provision that the biggest litigator state should compensate because they implicate and they delay.
great legal teacher many thanks to him
When will the book will be launched plzz tell us
Stay connected on what's app group
Trial...